DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Visit to Beat Dis Trust, the Tabernacle, Powis Square, on 28Th

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Visit to Beat Dis Trust, the Tabernacle, Powis Square, on 28Th Visit to Beat Dis Trust, The Tabernacle, Powis Square, on 28 th October 2003 . 11.00am, Victoria Borwick Staff present: Anthony Thomas - Manager, David Setchell Administrator, and Richard Dight – tutor Beat Dis Trust is an Arts organisation, which has been going for 14 years. Started initially by musicians committed to developing and promoting Jazz. Their popularity has grown dramatically, particularly their Saturday workshops. They work with North Kensington arts organisations, Kensington and Chelsea College and organised the recent Notting Hill jazz festival. They now have good studios in the Tabernacle and work very closely with the Tabernacle. Tabernacle is their landlord. They have a digital arts room, run music technology classes and band classes at different levels. There is huge demand for music technology courses, and they receive money from what was Funk, Campden Charities and £10K from RBKC. Using state-of-the art media technology combined with excellent community and professional contacts acquired over the years, the overall vision of Beat Dis is to be at the forefront of creative multi-media/music making, education and broadcasting. They run 4 courses a term, 4 terms a year for 10 weeks each, and are able to take 25-30 each term. Over 50 students apply for the courses mainly from the local area. They also ran an Internet radio project in conjunction with NIAS (National Insit, for adult learning) and the BBC. They do outreach work with Harrow Club/ Ebony / Pimento and also help them set up music technology courses/ events/ help them chose and buy appropriate equipment and give them advice. Originally they had their courses accredited by K & C College, but now are accredited to run their own LOCN courses (LOCN is a recognised awarding body that provides flexible learning programmes designed to meet the needs and aspirations of adult learners throughout London. LOCN is a membership organisation that draws its members from across the range of adult education providers, including FE and AE colleges, Universities), LOCN is a licensed member of the National Open College Network, which is a nation-wide organisation that provides accreditation and nationally recognised qualifications for the largest number of adult learners in the United Kingdom). 1 What activities were taking place ? I watched students on week 7 of a 10 week music technology course – This is not for the recalcitrant or those who do not wish to succeed. This is a busy, fast paced course for those that want to go into the music business, need skills, particularly technology skills for many roles. Many people use this course as a foundation course to go on to further education or employment using multimedia skills (films/ music/ journalism). They can take up to 10 people on each class. There are 3 tutors, and courses run 10 – 1am, 2-5pm and 6 – 9pm, for 40 weeks a year. There are four studios and students can learn and then work in their state of the art studios, learning recording techniques and all the various stages of music production (pre- production, editing, post production and duplication on to DAT/CD etc. The courses are supported by an excellent web site which summaries the course, and you can also get support by emailing your tutor. There is also an on-going support group for previous students. Students were appreciative of the facilities and opportunities on offer to them. Many people also use the organisation to provide on-going mentoring and support. What are the issues? There are two main parts to beat Dis Trust: there are the musicians and performers who use the facilities to play and perform (very successfully) as an arts and music and entertainment organisation, this also includes the Saturday afternoon Jazz band workshops. Secondly there is the Education side of the organisation. These courses are extremely popular – more people apply than they can fit in, and the funding for the courses only covers 25 students. Their funding from RBKC has been capped, so they will need to continue to seek funding elsewhere if they want to try and meet the demand for the courses. The courses also need to have the latest versions of the software and hardware in order to be valuable, and this is a significant expense each year. They also offer e-learning in order to be able to help people who cannot get on the courses. Excerpt from Beat Dis Mission Statement : Beat Dis has been based at the Tabernacle Centre since the mid 1980’s and currently runs music development programmes consisting of band workshops, music technology courses and previously an Internet radio. The projects undertaken have 2 aimed to provide opportunities that encourage and support local people to seek employment and develop careers in the music and multi-media industry. The object of the Beat Dis Arts is to advance the education of the inhabitants of North Kensington (particularly those who are unemployed, in conditions of financial hardship or who are other wise disadvantaged due to their social and economic circumstances) in music (its performance and creation), the music industry and related subjects. Beat Dis programme of arts, education and social activities aims to fulfil the following objectives Social Objectives: To promote social cohesion, community development and neighbourhood renewal To challenge social and economic exclusion To promote an understanding and appreciation of community diversity To challenge racism and discrimination in all its forms To enhance local, regional and national policies and strategies for the arts and education; social and economic development Educational Objectives: To promote lifelong learning To increase users capacity for self-determination and promote individual and collective achievement To extend possibilities for discovery and learning through appropriate, consistent and progressive opportunities from a variety of ‘levels/starting points’ To engage people in the creative process of making art and support people who wish to pursue a career in the arts To offer : Learning opportunities that provide an alternative to formal education techniques and strategies Affordable opportunities for personal development Inclusive access to all activities supported by clear information and ‘signing’ of activities Nurturing, formative and life-changing experiences, ‘First time’ chances and opportunities for career development To provide opportunities for users to Acquire new skills, develop existing skills and explore their creativity Develop communication and teamwork skills Explore new media processes and the digital arts Explore the relationship between artists, audiences and society 3 Work with practising artists and develop their critical understanding of the arts Artistic Objectives To broaden the audience for the arts and engage people in the ideas, practices and issues affecting artists and their work To promote diversity and equally of opportunity in the arts To enhance understanding of artists’ processes and preoccupations To explore : Diversity in terms of media, aesthetic issues, process and relationship to audience Work which lends itself to innovative learning processes and inspires creativity Work which combines, through its origins or associations, broad contemporary relevance with Local appeal Work which offers opportunity to explore the relationship between a variety of art disciplines Work which presents the relationship between or counterpoints traditional practices and contemporary expressions of art and culture Work which challenges the hierarchies that exist between popular culture and the ‘classical’ or ‘fine’ arts Work which examines notions of identity and community To offer artists: Opportunities to develop skills as trainers and interactive educators; facilitators and animators Challenging and stimulating environments that encourage new and experimental work and innovative forms of presentation Opportunities to explore the relationship between their work, audiences and society 4 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PCC Minutes 29 Jan TRANSCRIPT APPENDIX
    Appendix 1 Police and Crime Committee – 29 January 2014 Transcript of Item 3: Discussion with the Mayor on the Proposed Deployment of Water Cannon by the Metropolitan Police Service Joanne McCartney AM (Chair): Then we move to our main item, which is looking at proposals for the Metropolitan Police Service to purchase water cannon. Before I start, this is the first of a series of three meetings we have. We have this meeting today to question the Mayor. Tomorrow we are questioning the Deputy Mayor [for Policing and Crime, Stephen Greenhalgh] and the Deputy Commissioner [Craig Mackey]. Then next week we have Sir Hugh Orde [President, Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO)] and a representative from Liberty and an academic as well who we are talking to, looking at some of the broader issues around this. Perhaps I could start the questioning today and my question is to the Mayor initially. In December 2010 you said you had no plans to bring in water cannon in London. You stated at that time that you did not want to see an arms race developing between the police and protesters. Can I ask what has changed your mind? Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Very simply, I reiterate what I said. I do not want to see an arms race and I do not think that necessarily would be caused by having water cannon at the disposal of the Metropolitan Police Service. What has changed, really, is that ACPO has done a study about some of the situations in which water cannon might be used and it has concluded that there could be circumstances in which life could be saved and serious injury could be prevented.
    [Show full text]
  • London 2030 and Beyond Report of the King’S Commission on London
    The Policy Institute at King’s London 2030 and beyond Report of the King’s Commission on London MARCH 2018 About the Policy Institute at King’s The Policy Institute addresses complex policy and practice challenges with rigorous research, academic expertise and analysis focused on improving outcomes. Our vision is to contribute to building an ecosystem that enables the translation of research to inform policy and practice, and the translation of policy and practice needs into a demand-focused research culture. We do this by bringing diverse groups together, facilitating engagement between academic, business, philanthropic, clinical and policy communities around current and future societal issues. kcl.ac.uk/sspp/policy-institute @policyatkings The Policy Institute at King’s King’s College London Virginia Woolf Building 22 Kingsway London, WC2B 6LE For more information about this report, please contact Tony Halmos at [email protected] or on +44 (0)20 7848 2749 © The Policy Institute at King’s College London 4 London 2030 and Beyond | Report of the King’s Commission on London INTRODUCTION About the Commission The King’s Commission on London was convened in February 2016 by the Policy Institute at King’s College London. As stated in King’s Vision 2029, King’s is a civic university at the heart of London. The project was conceived as a time-limited, multi-disciplinary investigation of the major challenges faced by the university’s home city. The Commission was designed to connect research by world-leading academics at King’s with oversight from high-profile figures and experts from across the capital.
    [Show full text]
  • London 2030 and Beyond Report of the King’S Commission on London
    The Policy Institute at King’s London 2030 and beyond Report of the King’s Commission on London MARCH 2018 About the Policy Institute at King’s The Policy Institute addresses complex policy and practice challenges with rigorous research, academic expertise and analysis focused on improving outcomes. Our vision is to contribute to building an ecosystem that enables the translation of research to inform policy and practice, and the translation of policy and practice needs into a demand-focused research culture. We do this by bringing diverse groups together, facilitating engagement between academic, business, philanthropic, clinical and policy communities around current and future societal issues. kcl.ac.uk/sspp/policy-institute @policyatkings The Policy Institute at King’s King’s College London Virginia Woolf Building 22 Kingsway London, WC2B 6LE For more information about this report, please contact Tony Halmos at [email protected] or on +44 (0)20 7848 2749 © The Policy Institute at King’s College London 4 London 2030 and Beyond | Report of the King’s Commission on London INTRODUCTION About the Commission The King’s Commission on London was convened in February 2016 by the Policy Institute at King’s College London. As stated in King’s Vision 2029, King’s is a civic university at the heart of London. The project was conceived as a time-limited, multi-disciplinary investigation of the major challenges faced by the university’s home city. The Commission was designed to connect research by world-leading academics at King’s with oversight from high-profile figures and experts from across the capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Theresa May - the Prime Minister
    Contents Theresa May - The Prime Minister .......................................................................................................... 5 Nancy Astor - The first female Member of Parliament to take her seat ................................................ 6 Anne Jenkin - Co-founder Women 2 Win ............................................................................................... 7 Margaret Thatcher – Britain’s first woman Prime Minister .................................................................... 8 Penny Mordaunt – First woman Minister of State for the Armed Forces at the Ministry of Defence ... 9 Lucy Baldwin - Midwifery and safer birth campaigner ......................................................................... 10 Hazel Byford – Conservative Women’s Organisation Chairman 1990 - 1993....................................... 11 Emmeline Pankhurst – Leader of the British Suffragette Movement .................................................. 12 Andrea Leadsom – Leader of House of Commons ................................................................................ 13 Florence Horsbrugh - First woman to move the Address in reply to the King's Speech ...................... 14 Helen Whately – Deputy Chairman of the Conservative Party ............................................................. 15 Gillian Shephard – Chairman of the Association of Conservative Peers ............................................... 16 Dorothy Brant – Suffragette who brought women into Conservative Associations ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Democracy: Race and the 2015 General Election
    June 2015 Intelligence for a multi-ethnic Britain Diversity and Democracy: Race and the 2015 General Election Summary Table 1. Top 15 Labour vote share increases in diverse seats, 2015 • In 2015, Labour remained the first preference for most Labour Minority Black and minority ethnic voters, with around 60% choosing Constituency increase population Labour. The Conservatives have increased their vote share Birmingham, Hall Green 26.9% 64% significantly, from around 16% in 2010 to over 25% in 2015 Brent Central* 20.9% 61% • The Liberal Democrats got around 5% of the BME vote, and Poplar and Limehouse 18.6% 57% the Greens less. Only 2% of BME voters chose UKIP Bethnal Green and Bow 18.3% 53% • There is increasing variation in how different ethnic minority Birmingham, Ladywood 18.0% 73% groups vote, as well as regional differences Walthamstow 17.0% 53% • There are now 41 BME MPs, a significant rise, suggesting a Manchester, Gorton 17.0% 48% future BME Prime Minister could now be sitting in Parliament Birmingham, Hodge Hill 16.4% 64% • The success of Britain’s democracy depends not only on BME Leyton and Wanstead 15.0% 51% voter participation and representation, but on policymakers Ilford South 14.6% 76% responding to ethnic inequalities Leicester South 14.2% 51% Bradford East 13.8% 47% Introduction Bermondsey and Old Southwark* 13.8% 42% The 2015 General Election saw the Conservative Prime Ealing Southall 13.5% 70% Minister David Cameron returned with his party’s first overall Ealing Central and Acton* 13.1% 37% majority since John Major’s win in 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Christine Keeler and Me JERRY HAYES 12 John Bercow’S Unspeakable Memoirs
    ME ER M M B E R R O S F H S O N U S O E M Order! Order! OF COM The Official Journal of the Association of Former Members of Parliament SPRING 2020 ALSO IN THIS EDITION... NICHOLAS BENNETT 6 Number crunching the General Election TERESA PEARCE 7 The abuse MPs suffer threatens democracy IVAN LAWRENCE 11 How the National Lottery began Christine Keeler and ME JERRY HAYES 12 John Bercow’s Unspeakable memoirs Two former MPs remember the young woman at the centre of the Sixties sex scandal p. 4 & 5 Order! Order! Spring 2020 Note From the Editor By Andy McSmith here are 165 more former MPs than before, and that the Conservatives were Parliamentary Constituencies – now in Tthere were since the last issue of Order likely to benefit from “having sucked at its 27th edition – at a 50 % discount for Order, many of whom were not expecting the pool of Brexit support”. Association members. their circumstances to change so suddenly. He added that – ominously for Labour * * * Five who were, because they chose to – the single word that cropped up most n a magazine written and read by stand down, have contributed to the on the doorstep was ‘Corbyn’, and the Iformer MPs, the books reviewed in the current issue. Many thanks to Stephen most common phrases were “this time” back are all about politics. But late last Pound – whose father, Pelham Pound, and “not this time” – but he detected year I received one delightful book by is pictured on the front cover, with his signs that Labour was retaking some of that polymath ex-MP, Gyles Brandreth friend Stephen Ward – Jeremy Lefroy, the Remain vote back off the Liberal – Dancing by the Light of the Moon, How Teresa Pearce, Paul Farrelly and Sarah Democrats.
    [Show full text]
  • HPRU PPI & PPE Presentation
    Patient and Public Involvement & Engagement PPI Objectives To make research available to people in their ‘own backyard’ by forging links with local communities. Develop good practice guidance for researchers and scientists on engaging the community in translational research. Expand our communication of research activities and findings Develop the scope of our interactive education activities with a programme based on the National Beacons Programme for Public Engagement 12/11/2014 [email protected] PPI Strategic Oversight Group (SOG) Mireille Toledano (Lead) Ian Mudway (Deputy) Epidemiological assessment of low level environmental exposures THEME 1: Tony Fletcher Modes and Mechanisms of Toxicity THEME 2: Toby Athersuch Health Impact of low dose non-ionising and ionising radiation NGOs THEME 3: Antony Young Government General Public General Patient Groups Patient Health effects of noise and air pollution including nanoparticles THEME 4: Rachel Smith Community Advisory Board Arlean Rohde: concawe Barry Dennis: environmental services association John Cooke: mobile operators association Councillor Paul Braithwaite: Camden Borough Council Andrew Marszal: Freelance journalist Katherine Murphy: The Patients Association Emily Jesper: sense about science Monica Robb: Heathrow Association for the Control of Aircraft Noise Councillor Victoria Borwick: London Assembly (Dep Mayor) Dissemination Educational Resources SCAMP Study Interactive Website & Education Resources Educational experience EXHALE: 4,500 children provided with 3hr of science education
    [Show full text]
  • Strong Mayors' Leadership Capital: New York, London & Amsterdam
    STRONG MAYORS’ LEADERSHIP CAPITAL: NEW YORK, LONDON & AMSTERDAM (2000-2016) by Max William Stafford Canterbury Christ Church University Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2019 1 Abstract This thesis examines mayors and their interaction with their institutional limits. In particular, it considers, from the perspective of political leadership studies, how far mayors fitting the strong-mayor typology are able to assert their will in the face of these institutional limits. David Sweeting’s expositions on the strong-mayor model, supplemented by those of other theorists, form the thesis’ theoretical framework. This framework is applied to three original case studies (Michael Bloomberg in New York and Ken Livingstone & Boris Johnson in London). A fourth case study, of Job Cohen in Amsterdam, follows these and offers alternative perspectives (based upon the application a model of an appointed mayoralty). The analytical tool chosen – the Leadership Capital Index (LCI) – is a recent innovation in political leadership studies. The thesis’ findings demonstrate that there was clear potential for all of the mayors within the systems examined to assert their political will. What varies is how far mayors in different forms of strong-mayor systems can do this and how they achieve it. With regard to the LCI, the study concludes that it needs further development if it is to achieve longevity in terms of its place in the field. The thesis ends by outlining the future research agenda emerging as a result of this study. 2 Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................ 2 Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................. 7 List of Tables and Figures ..................................................................................................... 8 List of Interviewees* ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Full Authority 24 Nov 11 Transcript
    Transcript of the meeting of the Metropolitan Police Authority held on Thursday, 24 November 2011 at 10am in the Chamber, City Hall, SE1. Present: Members: Reshard Auladin (Vice Chair) Tony Arbour, Jennette Arnold, John Biggs, Faith Boardman, Chris Boothman, Victoria Borwick, Valerie Brasse, Cindy Butts, James Cleverly, Dee Doocey, Toby Harris, Kirsten Hearn, Jenny Jones, Clive Lawton, Joanne McCartney, Steve O’Connell, Amanda Sater, Valerie Shawcross and Graham Speed. MPA Officers: Catherine Crawford (Chief Executive) and Jane Harwood (Deputy Chief Executive) MPS Officers: Bernard Hogan-Howe (Commissioner), Cressida Dick (Assistant Commissioner), Anne McMeel (Director of Resources) and Gary Pugh (Director of Forensic Services). United Families and Friends Campaign: Samantha Rigg-David Reshard Auladin (Chair): Good morning, colleagues. It is 10am. We are going to start the meeting. The first item on the agenda is apologies for absence. We have apologies from Kit Malthouse, Bob Atkins and Neil Johnson. Kirsten Hearn (AM): Reshard, can we go round? I would like to know who is in the room. Reshard Auladin (Chair): I bg your pardon, Kirsten. Before we start can we just go round the table? I am Reshard Auladin, Vice Chair of the Authority. Catherine Crawford (Chief Executive): Catherine Crawford. Jane Harwood (Deputy Chief Executive): Jane Harwood. Graham Speed (AM): Graham Speed. Toby Harris (AM): Toby Harris. Clive Lawton (AM): Clive Lawton. Amanda Sater (AM): Amanda Sater. Tony Arbour (AM): Toby Arbour. Joanne McCartney (AM): Joanne McCartney. Jenny Jones (AM): Jenny Jones. Victoria Borwick (AM): Victoria Borwick. Steve O’Connell (AM): Steve O’Connell. Faith Boardman (AM): Faith Boardman. Dee Doocey (AM): Dee Doocey Cindy Butts (AM): Cindy Butts.
    [Show full text]
  • London's Political
    CONSTITUENCY MP (PARTY) MAJORITY Barking Margaret Hodge (Lab) 15,272 Battersea Jane Ellison (Con) 7,938 LONDON’S Beckenham Bob Stewart (Con) 18,471 Bermondsey & Old Southwark Neil Coyle (Lab) 4,489 Bethnal Green & Bow Rushanara Ali (Lab) 24,317 Bexleyheath & Crayford David Evennett (Con) 9,192 POLITICAL Brent Central Dawn Butler (Lab) 19,649 Brent North Barry Gardiner (Lab) 10,834 Brentford & Isleworth Ruth Cadbury (Lab) 465 Bromley & Chislehurst Bob Neill (Con) 13,564 MAP Camberwell & Peckham Harriet Harman (Lab) 25,824 Carshalton & Wallington Tom Brake (LD) 1,510 Chelsea & Fulham Greg Hands (Con) 16,022 This map shows the political control Chingford & Woodford Green Iain Duncan Smith (Con) 8,386 of the capital’s 73 parliamentary Chipping Barnet Theresa Villiers (Con) 7,656 constituencies following the 2015 Cities of London & Westminster Mark Field (Con) 9,671 General Election. On the other side is Croydon Central Gavin Barwell (Con) 165 Croydon North Steve Reed (Lab [Co-op]) 21,364 a map of the 33 London boroughs and Croydon South Chris Philp (Con) 17,410 details of the Mayor of London and Dagenham & Rainham Jon Cruddas (Lab) 4,980 London Assembly Members. Dulwich & West Norwood Helen Hayes (Lab) 16,122 Ealing Central & Acton Rupa Huq (Lab) 274 Ealing North Stephen Pound (Lab) 12,326 Ealing, Southall Virendra Sharma (Lab) 18,760 East Ham Stephen Timms (Lab) 34,252 Edmonton Kate Osamor (Lab [Co-op]) 15,419 Eltham Clive Efford (Lab) 2,693 Enfield North Joan Ryan (Lab) 1,086 Enfield, Southgate David Burrowes (Con) 4,753 Erith & Thamesmead
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Group Budget Amendment
    Conservative Group Amendment Blue paper Report to the Assembly on the Mayor’s Draft Consolidated Budget for 2012 – 2013 Report to: London Assembly Date: 25th January 2012 Report of: Conservative Group Proposed by: Gareth Bacon Seconded by: James Cleverly PART A: INTRODUCTION & COMMENTARY1 1 This report is made up of two Parts, A and B. The text in Part A does not form part of the formal budget amendments, which are set out in Part B. 1 Conservative Group Amendment Blue paper (This page has been deliberately left blank) 2 Conservative Group Amendment Blue paper Conservative Alternative Greater London Authority Budget 2012 – 2013 By the London Assembly Conservative Group: James Cleverly Richard Tracey Tony Arbour Gareth Bacon Richard Barnes Andrew Boff Victoria Borwick Brian Coleman Roger Evans Kit Malthouse Steve O’Connell January 2012 3 Conservative Group Amendment Blue paper Introduction The Conservative Assembly Group is producing its third alternative budget under a Conservative Mayor and administration in City Hall. Whereas under the previous administration we proposed wide-ranging alterations across all of the GLA Group to hold the Council Tax precept down to a more reasonable and realistic level in the face of a belligerent Mayor keen to squeeze every penny out of Londoners, we now have in Boris Johnson a far more responsible Mayor who is pressing down on costs across all the functional bodies and favouring a more realistic budget than his predecessor. We welcome the freeze in the precept for an unprecedented fourth year running. Ken Livingstone never got close to achieving a precept freeze or of even trying to do so even despite his Mayoralty coinciding with a time of financial prosperity.
    [Show full text]
  • Kensington Constituency Study
    Kensington Constituency Study Methodology Kensington Constituency Study Page 4 27 Apr 2017 Table 1 Q1. Normal weightings Q1. The next General Election is due to be held on 8th June 2017. On a 0 to 10 scale, where 0 = definitely not going to vote and 10 = definitely going to vote, how likely do you think you will be to vote in your Kensington constituency at the next General Election? Base: All Respondents EU Referendum EU Referendum Victoria Borwick Total Sex Age Wards General Election Voting Intention 2015 General Election Past Vote Past Vote Past Vote Favourability Borwick, Abouharb, McGhee, Bovill, Rose, Favour- Unfavour- Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ North South OTHER UND Leave Remain CON LAB LD UKIP Other Leave Remain CON LAB LD UKIP Green able able Unweighted Total 522 242 280 107 222 193 302 220 169 116 62 6 26 - 107 132 351 187 133 29 17 21 117 322 119 118 Weighted Total 522 258 264 172 199 150 234 288 175 112 63 5 27 - 110 127 361 203 120 21 17 25 112 330 126 113 10 = certain to vote 390 192 198 119 148 124 165 225 142 86 54 3 22 - 73 102 269 172 101 19 11 22 89 260 105 85 74.7% 74.5% 74.9% 68.9% 74.0% 82.2% 70.4% 78.2% 81.0% 77.1% 85.3% 59.1% 81.6% - 66.3% 80.6% 74.4% 84.6% 83.7% 89.7% 62.8% 86.5% 79.7% 78.9% 83.0% 75.5% 9 22 14 9 10 6 7 12 10 5 7 3 2 1 - 4 6 14 7 5 2 1 3 8 14 5 5 4.3% 5.3% 3.3% 5.7% 3.0% 4.4% 5.2% 3.5% 3.1% 6.3% 4.7% 40.9% 2.0% - 3.9% 4.5% 3.9% 3.4% 3.8% 7.6% 3.5% 10.8% 7.1% 4.3% 4.3% 4.6% 8 24 12 11 10 10 4 13 11 8 6 3 - - - 6 3 20 10 1 - 2 - 2 15 4 4 4.6% 4.8% 4.3% 5.9% 5.1% 2.4% 5.7% 3.7% 4.5% 5.5% 4.4% - -
    [Show full text]