DOCSLIB.ORG

Strong Mayors' Leadership Capital: New York, London & Amsterdam

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strong Mayors' Leadership Capital: New York, London & Amsterdam STRONG MAYORS’ LEADERSHIP CAPITAL: NEW YORK, LONDON & AMSTERDAM (2000-2016) by Max William Stafford Canterbury Christ Church University Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2019 1 Abstract This thesis examines mayors and their interaction with their institutional limits. In particular, it considers, from the perspective of political leadership studies, how far mayors fitting the strong-mayor typology are able to assert their will in the face of these institutional limits. David Sweeting’s expositions on the strong-mayor model, supplemented by those of other theorists, form the thesis’ theoretical framework. This framework is applied to three original case studies (Michael Bloomberg in New York and Ken Livingstone & Boris Johnson in London). A fourth case study, of Job Cohen in Amsterdam, follows these and offers alternative perspectives (based upon the application a model of an appointed mayoralty). The analytical tool chosen – the Leadership Capital Index (LCI) – is a recent innovation in political leadership studies. The thesis’ findings demonstrate that there was clear potential for all of the mayors within the systems examined to assert their political will. What varies is how far mayors in different forms of strong-mayor systems can do this and how they achieve it. With regard to the LCI, the study concludes that it needs further development if it is to achieve longevity in terms of its place in the field. The thesis ends by outlining the future research agenda emerging as a result of this study. 2 Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................ 2 Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................. 7 List of Tables and Figures ..................................................................................................... 8 List of Interviewees* ........................................................................................................... 10 1.0 Introduction: Literature and Research Questions ......................................................... 11 1.1 Introduction to the Literature Review ............................................................................. 13 1.2 Context ........................................................................................................................... 14 1.3 Interdisciplinary perspectives ......................................................................................... 16 1.4 Mayors and Leadership: Structural, Institutional and Agential Factors .......................... 18 1.4.1 The Recent Growth in Political Leadership Scholarship ........................................................... 18 1.4.2 Elected Mayors...................................................................................................................... 19 1.5 Theoretical Framework................................................................................................... 24 1.5.1 The Strong-Mayor Typology .................................................................................................. 24 1.5.2 The Sweeting Typology ......................................................................................................... 29 1.5.3 The Theoretical Framework’s Purpose ........................................................................................ 32 1.6 Institutionalism ............................................................................................................... 33 1.6.1 Placing institutionalism within the thesis .............................................................................. 33 1.6.2 Rational Choice Institutionalism ................................................................................................ 36 1.6.3 Definitions of Mayoral Agency .............................................................................................. 37 1.7 The Leadership Capital Index .......................................................................................... 39 1.8 Conclusion: The Literary “Space” for this Study and Resulting Research Questions ....... 41 2.0 Methods ....................................................................................................................... 43 2.1 The Comparative Method ................................................................................................ 44 2.2 Case Study Selection and Justification ............................................................................. 47 2.2.1 Selection Bias ........................................................................................................................ 48 2.3 Contextual Analysis and Policy Case Studies ................................................................... 49 2.4 The Leadership Capital Index ........................................................................................... 51 2.4.1 The LCI’s Theoretical Basis .................................................................................................... 51 2.4.2 Adapting the LCI and Applying it at the Local Level ................................................................. 55 2.5 The Ontological and Epistemological Stance of the Researcher ...................................... 67 2.6 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 69 3.0 Case Study Contexts ...................................................................................................... 71 3.1 The Office of the Mayor of New York and its Relationship to the City Council ................ 71 3.2 The Strong-Mayor System in New York ............................................................................ 74 3.3 The London Mayor: A Political Innovation (Pre-2000 Context) ........................................ 76 3.4 Governance Proposals Prior to the 1997 General Election .............................................. 77 3.5 1997-2000: Election to Election ....................................................................................... 80 3.5.1 The Referendum ............................................................................................................................ 80 3.5.2 Selecting (and electing) a Candidate ............................................................................................ 83 3 3.6 The Subsequent Context for the London Mayoralty ........................................................ 84 3.7 The Dutch Mayoralty ....................................................................................................... 85 3.8 The Consensual Approach to Local Leadership in The Netherlands ................................. 87 3.8.1 Burge vader ............................................................................................................................. 88 3.9 The Mayor of Amsterdam ................................................................................................. 90 3.10 The Relevant Literature To-Date .................................................................................. 93 3.10.1 London .................................................................................................................................. 93 3.10.2 New York .............................................................................................................................. 95 3.10.3 Amsterdam .......................................................................................................................... 97 4.0 Billionaire Builder: Michael Bloomberg (2002-2013) .................................................. 100 4.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 100 4.2 Economic Redevelopment: Background ........................................................................ 102 4.2.1 The 2002 Landscape .................................................................................................................. 102 4.2.2 Key Projects ............................................................................................................................... 102 4.2.3 Bloomberg’s ‘Luxury Product’ – A Billionaire’s Ambition? Gentrification Allegations ................... 109 4.2.4 Notable Non-Economic Issues and Policies................................................................................... 113 4.3 Analysis: The Leadership Capital of Michael Bloomberg ..................................................... 117 4.3.1 Political and Policy Vision .................................................................................................... 117 4.3.2 Communicative Performance .............................................................................................. 119 4.3.3 Personal poll rating relative to rating at most recent election .............................................. 121 4.3.4 Longevity (time in office) ..................................................................................................... 124 4.3.5 Selection or re-selection as party candidate (margin) ........................................................... 126 4.3.6 Party polling relative to most recent election result ............................................................. 127 4.3.7 Levels of public trust in leader ............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inner Thames Estuary Airport: Review of the Evidence on Socio- Economic Impacts a Report for the Airports Commission
    www.pwc.co.uk Inner Thames Estuary Airport: Review of the evidence on socio- economic impacts A report for the Airports Commission Airports Commission June 2014 Final report www.pwc.co.uk Important notice This final document has been prepared for the Airports Commission in accordance with the terms of the Provision of Consultancy for Commercial, Financial and Economic Option Appraisal and Analysis (DfT) framework and the Contract Reference RM 2750 (650) dated 12th February 2014 and solely for the purpose and on the terms agreed with the Airports Commission. We accept no liability (including for negligence) to anyone else in connection with this document. This document contains information obtained or derived from a variety of third party sources as indicated within the document. PwC has not sought to establish the reliability of those sources or verified the information so provided. Should any person other than the Airports Commission obtain access to and read this document, such persons accepts and agrees to the following terms: 1. The reader of this document understands that the work performed by PwC was performed in accordance with instructions provided by our client, the Airports Commission, and was performed exclusively for their benefit and use. The document may therefore not include all matters relevant to the reader. 2. The reader agrees that PwC accepts no liability (including for negligence) to them in connection with this document. Inner Thames Estuary Airport: Review of the evidence on socio-economic impacts Contents Executive summary 2 1. Introduction 6 2. Rationale for airport closure and commercial considerations 8 3.
    [Show full text]
  • PCC Minutes 29 Jan TRANSCRIPT APPENDIX
    Appendix 1 Police and Crime Committee – 29 January 2014 Transcript of Item 3: Discussion with the Mayor on the Proposed Deployment of Water Cannon by the Metropolitan Police Service Joanne McCartney AM (Chair): Then we move to our main item, which is looking at proposals for the Metropolitan Police Service to purchase water cannon. Before I start, this is the first of a series of three meetings we have. We have this meeting today to question the Mayor. Tomorrow we are questioning the Deputy Mayor [for Policing and Crime, Stephen Greenhalgh] and the Deputy Commissioner [Craig Mackey]. Then next week we have Sir Hugh Orde [President, Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO)] and a representative from Liberty and an academic as well who we are talking to, looking at some of the broader issues around this. Perhaps I could start the questioning today and my question is to the Mayor initially. In December 2010 you said you had no plans to bring in water cannon in London. You stated at that time that you did not want to see an arms race developing between the police and protesters. Can I ask what has changed your mind? Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Very simply, I reiterate what I said. I do not want to see an arms race and I do not think that necessarily would be caused by having water cannon at the disposal of the Metropolitan Police Service. What has changed, really, is that ACPO has done a study about some of the situations in which water cannon might be used and it has concluded that there could be circumstances in which life could be saved and serious injury could be prevented.
    [Show full text]
  • Would a New Hub Airport Be Commercially Viable?
    Would a new hub airport be commercially viable? Prepared for the Transport Committee January 25th 2013 Oxera i Draft for Comment: Strictly Confidential Oxera Consulting Ltd is registered in England No. 2589629 and in Belgium No. 0883.432.547. Registered offices at Park Central, 40/41 Park End Street, Oxford, OX1 1JD, UK, and Stephanie Square Centre, Avenue Louise 65, Box 11, 1050 Brussels, Belgium. Although every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the material and the integrity of the analysis presented herein, the Company accepts no liability for any actions taken on the basis of its contents. Oxera Consulting Ltd is not licensed in the conduct of investment business as defined in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. Anyone considering a specific investment should consult their own broker or other investment adviser. The Company accepts no liability for any specific investment decision, which must be at the investor’s own risk. © Oxera, 2013. All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism or review, no part may be used or reproduced without permission. Executive summary The Transport Committee is conducting an inquiry into the UK’s aviation strategy.1 Commissioned by the Committee and prepared by Oxera, this report assesses the conditions under which a new hub airport is, or is not, likely to be commercially viable. The assessment does not evaluate a specific proposal for a new hub; rather, it includes a range of scenarios covering various airport designs, demand forecasts, cost estimates and assumptions about the level of airport charges.
    [Show full text]
  • London 2030 and Beyond Report of the King’S Commission on London
    The Policy Institute at King’s London 2030 and beyond Report of the King’s Commission on London MARCH 2018 About the Policy Institute at King’s The Policy Institute addresses complex policy and practice challenges with rigorous research, academic expertise and analysis focused on improving outcomes. Our vision is to contribute to building an ecosystem that enables the translation of research to inform policy and practice, and the translation of policy and practice needs into a demand-focused research culture. We do this by bringing diverse groups together, facilitating engagement between academic, business, philanthropic, clinical and policy communities around current and future societal issues. kcl.ac.uk/sspp/policy-institute @policyatkings The Policy Institute at King’s King’s College London Virginia Woolf Building 22 Kingsway London, WC2B 6LE For more information about this report, please contact Tony Halmos at [email protected] or on +44 (0)20 7848 2749 © The Policy Institute at King’s College London 4 London 2030 and Beyond | Report of the King’s Commission on London INTRODUCTION About the Commission The King’s Commission on London was convened in February 2016 by the Policy Institute at King’s College London. As stated in King’s Vision 2029, King’s is a civic university at the heart of London. The project was conceived as a time-limited, multi-disciplinary investigation of the major challenges faced by the university’s home city. The Commission was designed to connect research by world-leading academics at King’s with oversight from high-profile figures and experts from across the capital.
    [Show full text]
  • When the Ladies of Love Left
    When the Ladies of Love Left Contact: Sanne Derks [email protected] www.sannederks.com Ingrid Gercama [email protected] www.anthrovision.com When the Ladies of Love Left… Mariska (a pseudonym) fears what will happen with her little savings now the COVID19 outbreak rages on. It has already been weeks since the Ministry of Health’s Outbreak Management Team has prohibited so-called "contact professions", and Mariska and her colleagues have been at home ever since. "Some ladies will suffer unbearably", the representative of the Prostitution Information Centre (PIC) says. Many sexworkers she knows work illegally behind the famous red light windows and will not be able to access social emergency care. "They will be out on the street before long". Others, she says, continue to work out of pure necessity, risking their own and families' health. The COVID-19 pandemic has a severe impact on the daily life of Amsterdam’s Red Light District. There is no area in the Netherlands where the measures to prevent the disease from spreading have created such a large contrast with the daily status-quo than at ‘de Wallen’, as the area with many brothels, coffeeshops and sex workers is cal- led. The streets are empty -- tourists, customers that usually brought much needed money, have long gone. This photo story tells the story of the ladies of love and explores their fears, doubts and shows what actually happened when the red curtains closed. About us: Sanne is a Dutch photojournalist with a strong focus on social documentary projects. She publishes in various me- dia e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing on Legal Prostitution in the Netherlands: Policies, Evaluations, Normalisation
    Briefing on legal prostitution in The Netherlands: policies, evaluations, normalisation Author: Karin Werkman Date: June 2016 Website: http://feminismandhumanrights.org 1. Introduction In 2000 The Netherlands became the first country to legalise all aspects of prostitution. It has since been a strong advocate for its pragmatic approach. This brief explains the Dutch law, lists research on the effects and outcomes of it, and explains the pending law proposal and current discussions. The image that always comes to mind when discussing the Dutch prostitution policy is that of the statue of Belle in Amsterdam. It is an almost symbolic translation of Dutch thinking on prostitution. It translates the view that The Netherlands have on prostitution, on what prostitution is. It is the figure of a woman in a window frame, in a self- confident, proud posture, hands on her hips, chin in the air. The statue was placed on the square in April 2007, unveiled at the first open doors day of the red light district1. Less than a month earlier, the newspapers reported on a study that had been published on prostitution in Rotterdam. It found that more than half of the prostituted women in Rotterdam ‘worked illegally’. ‘Working illegally’ meant that the women had been either forced into prostitution; were illegal (no residence status); were minors or worked in ‘illegal sex establishments’2. If in Rotterdam at least half of the women weren’t in prostitution legally or voluntarily, then how could they place a statue for them in Amsterdam in the same month? This contradiction, between the thinking on prostitution and the reality of it, is the topic of this brief.
    [Show full text]
  • London 2030 and Beyond Report of the King’S Commission on London
    The Policy Institute at King’s London 2030 and beyond Report of the King’s Commission on London MARCH 2018 About the Policy Institute at King’s The Policy Institute addresses complex policy and practice challenges with rigorous research, academic expertise and analysis focused on improving outcomes. Our vision is to contribute to building an ecosystem that enables the translation of research to inform policy and practice, and the translation of policy and practice needs into a demand-focused research culture. We do this by bringing diverse groups together, facilitating engagement between academic, business, philanthropic, clinical and policy communities around current and future societal issues. kcl.ac.uk/sspp/policy-institute @policyatkings The Policy Institute at King’s King’s College London Virginia Woolf Building 22 Kingsway London, WC2B 6LE For more information about this report, please contact Tony Halmos at [email protected] or on +44 (0)20 7848 2749 © The Policy Institute at King’s College London 4 London 2030 and Beyond | Report of the King’s Commission on London INTRODUCTION About the Commission The King’s Commission on London was convened in February 2016 by the Policy Institute at King’s College London. As stated in King’s Vision 2029, King’s is a civic university at the heart of London. The project was conceived as a time-limited, multi-disciplinary investigation of the major challenges faced by the university’s home city. The Commission was designed to connect research by world-leading academics at King’s with oversight from high-profile figures and experts from across the capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Theresa May - the Prime Minister
    Contents Theresa May - The Prime Minister .......................................................................................................... 5 Nancy Astor - The first female Member of Parliament to take her seat ................................................ 6 Anne Jenkin - Co-founder Women 2 Win ............................................................................................... 7 Margaret Thatcher – Britain’s first woman Prime Minister .................................................................... 8 Penny Mordaunt – First woman Minister of State for the Armed Forces at the Ministry of Defence ... 9 Lucy Baldwin - Midwifery and safer birth campaigner ......................................................................... 10 Hazel Byford – Conservative Women’s Organisation Chairman 1990 - 1993....................................... 11 Emmeline Pankhurst – Leader of the British Suffragette Movement .................................................. 12 Andrea Leadsom – Leader of House of Commons ................................................................................ 13 Florence Horsbrugh - First woman to move the Address in reply to the King's Speech ...................... 14 Helen Whately – Deputy Chairman of the Conservative Party ............................................................. 15 Gillian Shephard – Chairman of the Association of Conservative Peers ............................................... 16 Dorothy Brant – Suffragette who brought women into Conservative Associations ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Democracy: Race and the 2015 General Election
    June 2015 Intelligence for a multi-ethnic Britain Diversity and Democracy: Race and the 2015 General Election Summary Table 1. Top 15 Labour vote share increases in diverse seats, 2015 • In 2015, Labour remained the first preference for most Labour Minority Black and minority ethnic voters, with around 60% choosing Constituency increase population Labour. The Conservatives have increased their vote share Birmingham, Hall Green 26.9% 64% significantly, from around 16% in 2010 to over 25% in 2015 Brent Central* 20.9% 61% • The Liberal Democrats got around 5% of the BME vote, and Poplar and Limehouse 18.6% 57% the Greens less. Only 2% of BME voters chose UKIP Bethnal Green and Bow 18.3% 53% • There is increasing variation in how different ethnic minority Birmingham, Ladywood 18.0% 73% groups vote, as well as regional differences Walthamstow 17.0% 53% • There are now 41 BME MPs, a significant rise, suggesting a Manchester, Gorton 17.0% 48% future BME Prime Minister could now be sitting in Parliament Birmingham, Hodge Hill 16.4% 64% • The success of Britain’s democracy depends not only on BME Leyton and Wanstead 15.0% 51% voter participation and representation, but on policymakers Ilford South 14.6% 76% responding to ethnic inequalities Leicester South 14.2% 51% Bradford East 13.8% 47% Introduction Bermondsey and Old Southwark* 13.8% 42% The 2015 General Election saw the Conservative Prime Ealing Southall 13.5% 70% Minister David Cameron returned with his party’s first overall Ealing Central and Acton* 13.1% 37% majority since John Major’s win in 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • The Resilience of the Gentrifying Red Light Districts of London and Amsterdam
    Dealing with neighbourhood change: The resilience of the gentrifying red light districts of London and Amsterdam The #no fucking photo’s campaign was launched by a collective of sex workers and entrepreneurs of De Wallen (photo by author) Marthe Singelenberg Research Master Urban Studies June 23rd 2017 Supervisor: Wouter van Gent Second reader: Rivke Jaffe Wordcount: 7431 1 1. Abstract Since the early 2000’s, western cities have developed urban policies aimed at the regeneration of their red light districts by reducing the number of sexually oriented business and by stimulating public-private investments in real estate. It has been argued that these processes of state-led gentrification are transforming these districts into ‘sanitized spaces’, whereby marginalised groups such as sex workers are targeted for displacement. This research will look at experiences of neighbourhood change in the gentrifying red light districts of London and Amsterdam. Based on ethnographic fieldwork, it will show that these districts accommodate communities of place-based stakeholders with social and financial interests in the neighbourhood. As they use these interests to negotiate urban change, they contribute to the ways in which the gentrification of red light districts is accepted, contested and adopted. 2. Introduction The status of red light districts has been subject to ongoing public and academic debate. Within the urban discourse, they have been both marginalised and romanticised, avoided and frequented, endangered and protected, and recently, their existence has been contested. Worldwide, in cities like Hong Kong, Taipei, Montreal, Antwerp, London and Amsterdam, municipalities have developed policies aiming at reducing the physical presence of sex work in the city (Cheng 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Holding Pattern: an Analysis of Heathrow Airport’S Capacity Quandary
    Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Honors Program Theses and Projects Undergraduate Honors Program 4-30-2018 Holding Pattern: An Analysis of Heathrow Airport’s Capacity Quandary Dudley G. Oscar Bridgewater State University Follow this and additional works at: https://vc.bridgew.edu/honors_proj Part of the Aviation Commons Recommended Citation Oscar, Dudley G.. (2018). Holding Pattern: An Analysis of Heathrow Airport’s Capacity Quandary. In BSU Honors Program Theses and Projects. Item 392. Available at: https://vc.bridgew.edu/honors_proj/392 Copyright © 2018 Dudley G. Oscar This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. Running head: HOLDING PATTERN Holding Pattern: An Analysis of Heathrow Airport’s Capacity Quandary Dudley G. Oscar Submitted in Partial Completion of the Requirements for Departmental Honors in Aviation Science Bridgewater State University April 30, 2018 Dr. Michael Welch, Thesis Advisor Prof. Michael Farley, Committee Member HOLDING PATTERN 2 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 3 Chapter 1: History ......................................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 2: To Expand or Not to Expand? .................................................................................... 11 Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Christine Keeler and Me JERRY HAYES 12 John Bercow’S Unspeakable Memoirs
    ME ER M M B E R R O S F H S O N U S O E M Order! Order! OF COM The Official Journal of the Association of Former Members of Parliament SPRING 2020 ALSO IN THIS EDITION... NICHOLAS BENNETT 6 Number crunching the General Election TERESA PEARCE 7 The abuse MPs suffer threatens democracy IVAN LAWRENCE 11 How the National Lottery began Christine Keeler and ME JERRY HAYES 12 John Bercow’s Unspeakable memoirs Two former MPs remember the young woman at the centre of the Sixties sex scandal p. 4 & 5 Order! Order! Spring 2020 Note From the Editor By Andy McSmith here are 165 more former MPs than before, and that the Conservatives were Parliamentary Constituencies – now in Tthere were since the last issue of Order likely to benefit from “having sucked at its 27th edition – at a 50 % discount for Order, many of whom were not expecting the pool of Brexit support”. Association members. their circumstances to change so suddenly. He added that – ominously for Labour * * * Five who were, because they chose to – the single word that cropped up most n a magazine written and read by stand down, have contributed to the on the doorstep was ‘Corbyn’, and the Iformer MPs, the books reviewed in the current issue. Many thanks to Stephen most common phrases were “this time” back are all about politics. But late last Pound – whose father, Pelham Pound, and “not this time” – but he detected year I received one delightful book by is pictured on the front cover, with his signs that Labour was retaking some of that polymath ex-MP, Gyles Brandreth friend Stephen Ward – Jeremy Lefroy, the Remain vote back off the Liberal – Dancing by the Light of the Moon, How Teresa Pearce, Paul Farrelly and Sarah Democrats.
    [Show full text]