DOCSLIB.ORG

Possible Opportunities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Possible Opportunities Table of Contents Table of Contents Page Introduction 1 Charge to Review Committee Review Team Itinerary Department Snapshot Department Organizational Chart Administrative Organizational Charts- COALS, Texas A&M University Texas A&M University Organizational Chart Campus Map PLPM Plant Disease Diagnostic Laboratories Brief History of the Plant Pathology and Microbiology Program 15 Overview and History of the Department Research Subject Focus Areas List of Department Committees Department Bylaws and Committee Responsibilities Results of Last Program Review Affiliated Programs 27 Introduction Institute for Plant Genomics and Biotechnology (IPGB) Program for the Biology of Filamentous Fungi (PBoFF) Molecular and Environmental Plant Sciences Center for Phage Technology (CPT) Intercollegiate Faculty of Virology (IFOV) Intercollegiate Faculty of Genetics (FOG) Vision, Mission and Strategic Plan 31 Executive Summary Vision and Mission Statements Goals and Priority Objectives Department Strategic Plan Department Challenges Faculty and Support Personnel 49 On campus Faculty Off campus Faculty Adjunct Faculty Map of Research and Extension Centers Faculty Awards Faculty 2-page Curriculum Vitas Staff Position Descriptions and Duties Comparison of Faculty FTEs and Staff/Faculty Ratios 1 Table of Contents Research and Scholarly Activities 139 Definition and Scope of Research Examples of recent PLPM Faculty Research Impacts Productivity (FY06-FY10) Grant Productivity per FTE Distribution of Faculty PLPM FTEs for FY11 Current Grant Support: Research Faculty Current Grant Support: Extension Faculty Faculty Publications (2006 to Feb 2011) Teaching Undergraduate Program in Bioenvironmental Sciences (BESC) 175 Background BESC majors since 2003 Program Summary and Course Requirements Environmental Studies (ENST) BESC Honors Program Undergraduate Internships/Research Experiences Undergraduate Student Awards Recent BESC Graduates International Education Programs (Study Abroad) ‘Invisible Jungle’ Radio Program Undergraduate Research Opportunities Underrepresented Student Recruitment Efforts PLPM Scholarships Challenges to the BESC program Teaching Graduate Program in Plant Pathology and Microbiology (PLPM) 201 Introduction Course Offerings Graduate Student Enrollment Post-doctoral Students Graduate Student Support Graduate Minority Programs Challenges to the Graduate Program Graduate Student Awards Recent Graduates and Abstracts Post-doctoral Student Mentoring & Development Assessment of Student Learning: Undergraduate and Graduate 215 General Overview of Assessment Assessment of Undergraduate Student Learning: BESC Program Assessment of Graduate Student Learning: PLPM Program Assessment of Faculty Teaching Proficiency Current Faculty Teaching Assignments 2 Table of Contents BESC Senior Exit Survey Results Impediments to Excellence 225 Potential Opportunities 231 Appendices Diskette Appendix A- University Vision 2020 and Action 2015 Plans. Appendix B- COALS Strategic Plan Appendix C-AgriLife Research Strategic Plan Appendix D- AgriLife Extension Service Strategic Plan Appendix E- Faculty Curriculum Vitaes Appendix F- Course Syllabi Appendix G- Graduate Student Handbook Appendix H- Departmental Newsletter Appendix I- Departmental Common Equipment 3 Charge to Review Team Charge to Peer Review Team Plant Pathology and Microbiology Program Review This letter provides you with a brief background on the Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology at Texas A&M University, and explains the expectations for our upcoming departmental review. The Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology was created in 1985 from the Department of Plant Sciences. The department offers an undergraduate B.S. in Bioenvironmental Sciences as well as the M.S. and Ph.D. in Plant Pathology and Microbiology, plus a M.Agr. in Plant Protection or Plant Sciences. Each year, the department awards approximately 60 B.S. degrees in Bioenvironmental Sciences and 2-3 M.S. or Ph.D. degrees in Plant Pathology and Microbiology. This review is part of a periodic review of all Texas A&M University academic programs, and offers an opportunity to assess the standards of the programs and to learn from review team member’s experiences with similar programs. I request that the review team examine the undergraduate, graduate and research programs of the Department using the materials that will be provided, information you gain through personal interactions while visiting Texas A&M, and any additional information that you might request. While evaluating the program, please consider the allocation of resources within the department (both human and fiscal) and the absolute level of support the department receives from the university. Please comment as appropriate on current and potential leveraging of these resources, as well as current and potential interaction with other departments and groups, both on campus and off. Also, please address the issue of learning-based outcomes: Does the Department have ongoing and integrated planning and evaluation processes that assess its programs and services that result in continuing improvement and that demonstrate that the Department is effectively accomplishing its mission? Has the Department identified expected outcomes for its educational programs? Does the Department have evidence of improvement based upon analysis of results? In addition, I ask that you address the impact of the Faculty Reinvestment Program, started by Texas A&M University in 2003. The reinvestment program resulted in the hiring of approximately 450 new faculty members dispersed throughout the University. The goal is to improve the quality of education for Texas A&M students by having more faculty available for mentoring and advising, whether more courses or sections are available, or by simply being more responsive to student needs. Through this review we plan to track and measure real increases and improvements in the quality of the graduate and undergraduate experiences across all dimensions. The Department was allowed to use some of the reinvestment funding from the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences for salary and startup for a Director of the Institute for Plant Genomics and Biotechnology (M. Dickman) and one Assistant Professor (L. Shan). We ask that you assess the success of the Department in moving their teaching and research agendas forward with these hires based on information provided to you in the forthcoming self- study. I look forward to meeting with you and the entire committee in April. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me. 4 Review Team Itinerary (Tentative) PLPM Review Team Itinerary Sunday, April 17 Team members arrive in College Station and are transported to Rudder Jessup B&B, 115 Lee Avenue, College Station (866-744-2470). 6:00 – 8:00 PM Dinner with Dept. Head Dr. Sandy Pierson, and Associate DHs Dr. David Appel and Dr. Chuck Kenerley. Monday, April 18 7:30 - 8:30 AM Breakfast at B&B with Provost Karan Watson, Vice Provost J. Martyn Gunn, Associate VP Graduate Studies Karen Butley-Purry and Associate Provost Undergraduate Studies Pamela Matthews. 8:45 AM Team is picked up by Dr. Pierson and transported to the new Agricultural Administration Building on west campus. 9:00 – 10:00 AM Meet with Dean’s office. 10:00 AM Pick up by Dr. Pierson, transported to Peterson Building on main campus. 10:30 – 11:30 AM Meet with PLPM administration (Dr. Pierson, Dr. Appel, Dr. Kenerley, and Linda Brochu). 11:30 – 12:30 PM Lunch with PLPM graduate students (Peterson 112). 12:30 – 1:30 PM Tour of Peterson Building and main campus greenhouses. 1:30 – 2:00 PM Meet with a Faculty group (Peterson 103). 2:00 – 3:00 PM Meet with a Faculty group (Peterson 103). 3:00 – 3:15 PM Break. 3:15 – 3:45 PM Refreshments with BESC undergraduate students (Peterson 112). 3:45 – 4:15 PM Meet with a Faculty group (Peterson 103). 4:15 – 5:00 PM Informal department reception (Fox and Hound). 5:00 PM Transport back to B&B. 6:00 – 8:00 PM Dinner. 5 Review Team Itinerary Tuesday, April 19 8:00 – 9:00 AM Breakfast on own at B&B. 9:00 AM Pick up by Dr. Pierson, transported to Peterson Building. 9:30 – 10:00 AM Meet with Undergraduate Program Committee (UPC) (Peterson 103). 10:00 – 10:30 AM Meet with Graduate Program Committee (GPC) (Peterson 103). 10:30 AM Break. 10:45 – 11:15 AM Meet with Student Advising and Assessment Committees (Peterson 103). 12:00 – 1:00 PM Lunch with COALS Department Heads (Rudder Tower University Club). 1:00 PM Transport to Borlaug Center on west campus. 1:30 – 2:00 PM Meet with Faculty at IPGB in Borlaug Center (M. Dickman, Director, L. Shan, J. Yuan, P. de Figueiredo). 2:00 – 2:45 PM Tour of Borlaug Center and greenhouses. 2:45 PM Transport to Peterson. 3:00 – 5:00 PM Review Team’s choice: follow-ups, report discussion, or relax. 5:00 PM Transport to B&B. Working dinner. Wednesday, April 20 7:30 – 9:00 AM Breakfast at B&B with Provost, Vice Provost, and Dean’s office. 9:30 AM Picked up by Dr. Pierson (with baggage). 10:00 – 10:45 AM Report to PLPM administrative team with discussion (Peterson 103). 10:45 – 11:15 AM Time for review team alone. 11:15 – 12:15 PM Open meeting between review team and department members (Evans Library Room 106). 12:15 PM Brunch. Get team members to airport for flights home. 6 Organization Snapshot of Plant Pathology and Microbiology The Department of Plant Pathology & Microbiology (PLPM) is committed to advancing its educational, research and extension programs with the goal of being recognized for excellence
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ataenius Heinekeni Wollatson, 1894 (Insecta: Coleoptera: Aphodiinae)
    (A. heinekeni) Ataenius heinekeni Wollatson, 1894 (Insecta: Coleoptera: Aphodiinae) By: Edrick Lugo Millán & Verónica Acevedo Ramírez, Juliana Cardona, Nico Franz Geographic Range: Bahamas (Andros), Barbados (probably introduced), Cuba, Hispaniola, Puerto Rico (Quebradillas- east of Lago Guajataca, Bayamón, Mayagüez), St. Thomas. USA (SC-FLTX), Mexico to Brazil, introduced to Ascension and Madeira islands. Habitat: A. heinekeni beetles were beaten from leaves, collected under leaves and logs on hard ground, under live-oak trees, on old rice-field dams, under roadside debris and at coastal coppice trap. (Jerath,1960). They are mainly found in animal dung and decaying material. Physical Description: Ataenius is distinguished from other genera of the Eupariini by a combination of characters, among them head narrower than pronotum, anterior clypeus visible from above, pronotum laterally without denticles and at most sparsely to moderately ciliate, sides of pronotum not explanate, elytra often with basal margination, front tibiae with slanted anterior margin, middle and hind tibiae not flattened, uniformly wider from base, hind tibiae straight with outer apical angle spiniformly prolonged, tarsi normal with first segment often as long as the following three segments combined (SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY, no 154). Length 4.3.-5.5 mm. Usually reddish-brown to black, few with color patterns, some dorsally setose.. Head moderately convex, surface smooth, granulate, wrinkled, or rugose. Abdominal fluting is distinct. External sexual dimorphisms are subtle, if present. Life Stages: The life cycle of Ataenius beetles is not well known but apparently they are humus feeders in the soil, with a few species attracted to decaying vegetation and to animal dung.
    [Show full text]
  • Jordan Beans RA RMO Dir
    Importation of Fresh Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), Shelled or in Pods, from Jordan into the Continental United States A Qualitative, Pathway-Initiated Risk Assessment February 14, 2011 Version 2 Agency Contact: Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory Center for Plant Health Science and Technology United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Plant Protection and Quarantine 1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 300 Raleigh, NC 27606 Pest Risk Assessment for Beans from Jordan Executive Summary In this risk assessment we examined the risks associated with the importation of fresh beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), in pods (French, green, snap, and string beans) or shelled, from the Kingdom of Jordan into the continental United States. We developed a list of pests associated with beans (in any country) that occur in Jordan on any host based on scientific literature, previous commodity risk assessments, records of intercepted pests at ports-of-entry, and information from experts on bean production. This is a qualitative risk assessment, as we express estimates of risk in descriptive terms (High, Medium, and Low) rather than numerically in probabilities or frequencies. We identified seven quarantine pests likely to follow the pathway of introduction. We estimated Consequences of Introduction by assessing five elements that reflect the biology and ecology of the pests: climate-host interaction, host range, dispersal potential, economic impact, and environmental impact. We estimated Likelihood of Introduction values by considering both the quantity of the commodity imported annually and the potential for pest introduction and establishment. We summed the Consequences of Introduction and Likelihood of Introduction values to estimate overall Pest Risk Potentials, which describe risk in the absence of mitigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetically Modified Baculoviruses for Pest
    INSECT CONTROL BIOLOGICAL AND SYNTHETIC AGENTS This page intentionally left blank INSECT CONTROL BIOLOGICAL AND SYNTHETIC AGENTS EDITED BY LAWRENCE I. GILBERT SARJEET S. GILL Amsterdam • Boston • Heidelberg • London • New York • Oxford Paris • San Diego • San Francisco • Singapore • Sydney • Tokyo Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier Academic Press, 32 Jamestown Road, London, NW1 7BU, UK 30 Corporate Drive, Suite 400, Burlington, MA 01803, USA 525 B Street, Suite 1800, San Diego, CA 92101-4495, USA ª 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved The chapters first appeared in Comprehensive Molecular Insect Science, edited by Lawrence I. Gilbert, Kostas Iatrou, and Sarjeet S. Gill (Elsevier, B.V. 2005). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone (þ44) 1865 843830, fax (þ44) 1865 853333, e-mail [email protected]. Requests may also be completed on-line via the homepage (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissions). Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Insect control : biological and synthetic agents / editors-in-chief: Lawrence I. Gilbert, Sarjeet S. Gill. – 1st ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-12-381449-4 (alk. paper) 1. Insect pests–Control. 2. Insecticides. I. Gilbert, Lawrence I. (Lawrence Irwin), 1929- II. Gill, Sarjeet S. SB931.I42 2010 632’.7–dc22 2010010547 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978-0-12-381449-4 Cover Images: (Top Left) Important pest insect targeted by neonicotinoid insecticides: Sweet-potato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci; (Top Right) Control (bottom) and tebufenozide intoxicated by ingestion (top) larvae of the white tussock moth, from Chapter 4; (Bottom) Mode of action of Cry1A toxins, from Addendum A7.
    [Show full text]
  • Larvae of Ataenius (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Aphodiinae
    Eur. J. Entomol. 96: 57—68, 1999 ISSN 1210-5759 Larvae ofAtaenius (Coleóptera: Scarabaeidae: Aphodiinae): Generic characteristics and species descriptions José R. VERDÚ and E duardo GALANTE Departamento de Ciencias Ambientales y Recursos Naturales, Universidad de Alicante, E-03080 Alicante, Spain Key words.Scarabaeidae, Aphodiinae, Ataenius, larvae, description, key, dung beetles, turfgrass beetles, taxonomy Abstract. We compared the larval morphology of the genera Ataenius and Aphodius. The third larval instars of five Ataenius species: Ataenius opatrinus Harold, A. picinus Harold, A. platensis (Blanchard), A. simulator Harold and A. strigicauda Bates, are described or redescribed and illustrated. The most important morphological characteristics of the larvae of Ataenius are found in the respiratory plate of thoracic spiracle, the setation of venter of the last abdominal segment, the setation of the epicranial region and the morphology of the epipharynx. A key to larvae of the known species of Ataenius is included. INTRODUCTION del Sacramento (Uruguay). For the purpose of laboratory studies, a total of 10 to 20 adult specimens of each species were The genus Ataenius Harold comprises 320 species, of kept in cylindrical plastic breeding cages (20 cm high, 10 cm which 228 species are found in America, 49 in Australia, wide) with moist soil and dry cow dung from which they had 11 in Africa, 6 in East Asia, 2 in Madagascar, and single been collected. The lid was an opening (6 cm diameter) covered species in India, Sri Lanka, Turkestan, Japan, Hawaii and with gauze screen. These breeding cages were maintained in an Sumatra, respectively (Dellacasa, 1987). Despite the rich­ environmental chamber at 25 : 20°C (L : D), 80 ± 5% RH, with ness of this genus and its worldwide distribution, the lar­ a photoperiod of 15 : 9 (L : D).
    [Show full text]
  • Scarab Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in the Dung of Native Arkansas Mammals J
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 67 Article 13 2013 Scarab Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in the Dung of Native Arkansas Mammals J. B. Kelley University of Arkansas at Monticello J. L. Hunt University of Arkansas at Monticello, [email protected] M. B. Connior South Arkansas Community College Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Kelley, J. B.; Hunt, J. L.; and Connior, M. B. (2013) "Scarab Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in the Dung of Native Arkansas Mammals," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 67 , Article 13. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol67/iss1/13 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 67 [2013], Art. 13 Scarab Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in the Dung of Native Arkansas Mammals J.B. Kelley¹, J.L. Hunt¹*, and M.B. Connior² ¹University of Arkansas at Monticello, Monticello, AR ²South Arkansas Community College, El Dorado, AR *Correspondence:[email protected] Running Title: Scarab Beetles in the Dung of Native Arkansas Mammals Abstract habitat, Slay et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Hummingbird Neonicotinoid Pesticide Study
    NOAH’S NOTES PROJECT TITLE: Nontarget effects of neonicotinoids on Ruby-throated Hummingbird (Archilochus colubris) PI: Vera Krischik, Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, [email protected] COOPERATORS: Pending Abstract Neonicotinyl insecticides are systemic, which means they are applied to the soil or on seeds and move from the soil to roots, leaves, pollen, and nectar. In the U.S., one-third of all crop (143 million acres / total 442 million acres) are treated with over 2 million pounds of neonicotinyl insecticides. The high use of neonicotinyl insecticides makes it probable that a foraging bee or hummingbird will consume nectar and pollen from a neonicotinoid-treated plant, which can reduce foraging, health, and perhaps increase mortality, although we do not know this until we do research. We know that higher amounts of neonicotinoids are used on ornamental plants compared to field crops. In addition, even higher rates are used on trees when they are injected or have a soil drench of a neonicotinoid insecticide. We do not know if these higher levels of neonicotinoids found in ornamental plants affect hummingbirds. However, field relevant doses of neonicotinoid insecticides were shown to affect bee colony health, foraging, and queen production of native bees. In ornamental flowering plants grown for residential and commercial landscapes, a soil application of imidacloprid is 300 mg for a 3-gallon pot (Marathon 1%G or Bayer Advanced Tree and Shrub, Bayer CropScience). This is a 230 times higher rate when compared to a seed treatment rate on corn (1.3 mg AI /seed), and a 75 times higher rate when compared to a field crop rate (4 mg AI /sg ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Ataenius Picinus Harold, 1868 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Aphodiinae) Associated with Exposed Carcasses in Southern Brazil
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repositorio da Producao Cientifica e Intelectual da Unicamp ISSN 2443-437X (electrónico) ENTOMOTROPICA Vol. 31(6): 48-53 ISSN 1317-5262 (impreso) on line 19-Febrero-2016 Record of Ataenius picinus Harold, 1868 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Aphodiinae) associated with exposed carcasses in Southern Brazil Ana Carolina Reimann Ries1, Vinícius da Costa Silva², Pedro Giovâni da Silva3, Betina Blochtein1, Patrícia Jacqueline Thyssen4 1Departamento de Biodiversidade e Ecologia, Faculdade de Biociências, Laboratório de Entomologia. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul. Avenida Ipiranga, 6681, CEP 90619-900, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. E-mail: [email protected]. ²Laboratório de Biologia Evolutiva, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, CEP 97105-900, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. ³Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Departamento de Ecologia e Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, CEP 88040- 900, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil. 4Departamento de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, UNICAMP. Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, Campinas, São Paulo. CEP 13083-862. Abstract Ries ACR, Silva VC, da Silva PG, Blochtein B, Thyssen PJ. 2016. Record of Ataenius picinus Harold, 1868 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Aphodiinae) associated with exposed carcasses in Southern Brazil. Entomotropica 31(6): 48-53. Ataenius picinus Harold, 1868 is a scarab beetle, which is distributed worldwide. Individuals of this species have been found associated with animal feces, soil samples, leaf litter and decaying fruit, as some cases on carcasses. In this study, we propose the extension of trophic niche of this species based on observations of alternative scavenging resources.
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Ataenius</I> HAROLD, 1867. IV. Revision of the <I>A. Strigicauda
    Acta zoologica cracoviensia, 47(3-4): 211-228, Kraków, 31 December, 2004 The New World species of Ataenius HAROLD, 1867. IV. Revision of the A. strigicauda-group (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Aphodiinae: Eupariini)* Zdzis³awa STEBNICKA Received: 15 May 2004 Accepted for publication: 5 Sept. 2004 STEBNICKA Z. 2004. The New World species of Ataenius HAROLD, 1867. IV. Revision of the A. strigicauda-goup (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Aphodiinae: Eupariini). Acta zoo- logica cracoviensia 47(3-4): 211-228. Abstract. The strigicauda-group of the six New World species of Ataenius HAROLD is re- vised. A lectotype of Ataenius vexator HAROLD is here designated, the following new synonyms are proposed: Ataenius columbicus HAROLD, 1880 (= A. tesari BALTHASAR, 1947, syn. n.); A. heinekeni WOLLASTON, 1854 [(= A. rhyticephalus (CHEVROLAT, 1864) syn. n., = A. vexator HAROLD, 1869, syn. n.] and A. strigicauda BATES, 1887 (= A. aspericollis PETROVITZ, 1973, syn. n.). The taxonomic history of the species-complex, diagnostic characters and key are provided, available biological information and distribu- tion data are given. Key words: Scarabaeidae, Aphodiinae, Ataenius strigicauda-group, taxonomy, New World. Zdzis³awa STEBNICKA, Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Acad- emy of Sciences, S³awkowska 17, 31-016 Krakow, Poland. E-mail: [email protected] I. INTRODUCTION The present paper is the fourth in a series in which the New World species of Ataenius HAROLD are revised and deals with A. strigicauda-group. The group is composed of six very similar and closely allied species including the “heinekeni (=rhyticephalus)-columbicus-strigicauda” com- plex. The taxonomy of this complex has been embroiled in confusion due to a series of mistakes that were repeated and compounded through the extensive literature (see References).
    [Show full text]
  • Data on Nesting and Preimaginal Development in Two Mexican Species of Ataenius Harold, 1867 (Co~Eoptera, Scarabaeoidea, Aphodiidae; Eupariinae)
    Folia Entomol. Mex. 41(1):1-5 (2002) DATA ON NESTING AND PREIMAGINAL DEVELOPMENT IN TWO MEXICAN SPECIES OF ATAENIUS HAROLD, 1867 (CO~EOPTERA, SCARABAEOIDEA, APHODIIDAE; EUPARIINAE) MAGDALENA CRUZ R. AND IMELDA MARTÍNEZ M. Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Departamento de Ecología y Comportamiento Animal. Km 2.5 ant. Carr. a Coatepec No. 351, Congregación El Haya, CP 91070, Apartado Postal 63, Xalapa, Ver. MÉXICO [email protected], [email protected] Cruz R., M. and l. Martínez M., 2002. Data onnesting and preimaginal development in two Mexican species of Ataenius Harold, 1867 (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea, Aphodiidae; Eupariinae). Folia Entamo!. Mex., 41(1): 1-5. ABSTRACT. This study describes the ovipositing behavior of Ataenius sculptor Harold andA. apicalis Hinton under controlled conditions of temperature and humidity. Both species laid groups of eggs in cavities prepared by females in soil or between dung pats and soil. A. sculptor laid 16 to 18 eggs per clutch andA. apicalis 16 eggs. The larval period of A. sculptor, !asted about four weeks. Third-instar larvae burrowed into soil and elaborated cavities to pupate. The pupa! period !asted one week. The A. sculptor second generation matured for almost two months befo re beginning to oviposit. In A. apicalis, preimaginal development !asted from four to five weeks with the larval period almost three weeks. Third-instar larvae also buried themselves before pupation and showed a pupa! period of approximately two weeks. KEY WORDS: preimaginal development, Ataenius, Coleoptera, Aphodiidae, dung beetles, Mexico. Cruz R., M. e l. Martínez M., 2002. Datos sobre nidificación y desarrollo preimaginal de dos especies mexicanas de Ataenius Harold, 1867 (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea.
    [Show full text]
  • Importation of Fresh Fruit of Avocado, Persea Americana Miller Var. 'Hass
    Importation of Fresh Fruit of Avocado, Persea americana Miller var. ‘Hass’, into the Continental United States from Colombia A Pathway-Initiated Risk Assessment October 31, 2016 Version 4 Agency Contact: Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory Center for Plant Health Science and Technology United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Plant Protection and Quarantine 1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 300 Raleigh, NC 27606 Pest Risk Assessment for Hass Avocado from Colombia Executive Summary The Republic of Colombia requested approval for imports into the continental United States of fresh avocado fruit, Persea americana Mill. var. ‘Hass’, without a peduncle. Because this commodity has not been imported from Colombia before, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) conducted a pathway-initiated risk assessment to determine the risks associated with importing these ‘Hass’ avocados. We developed a list of pests known to occur in Colombia and associated with avocado based on the scientific literature, port-of-entry pest interception data, and information provided by the Colombian Ministry for Agriculture and Rural Development, and the Colombian Agricultural Institute (ICA). Commercial ‘Hass’ avocado is a conditional non-host for the fruit flies, Anastrepha fraterculus, A. striata, and Ceratitis spp. Thus, we did not list these organisms in the assessment. We determined that three quarantine arthropod pests were likely to follow the pathway, and qualitatively analyzed them to determine the unmitigated risk posed to the United States. Pest Taxonomy Pest Risk Potential Heilipus lauri Boheman Coleoptera: Curculionidae High Heilipus trifasciatus (Fabricius) Coleoptera: Curculionidae High Stenoma catenifer Walsingham Lepidoptera: Elaschistidae High All pests were rated High and for pests with High pest risk potential, mitigations beyond port-of- entry inspection are recommended.
    [Show full text]
  • Scarabaeidae: Aphodiinae: Eupariini)
    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 19, No. 1-2, March-June, 2005 55 The New World species of Ataenius Harold, 1867. V. Revision of the A. strigatus group (Scarabaeidae: Aphodiinae: Eupariini) Zdzislawa T. Stebnicka Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals Polish Academy of Sciences SB´awkowska 17, 31-016 Krakow, Poland [email protected] Paul K. Lago Biology Department University of Mississippi University, MS 38677 [email protected] Abstract. The strigatus group of the New World species of Ataenius Harold is revised. Seventeen species are recognized including two species described as new: Ataenius ecruensis sp. nov. from the United States and A. oaxacaensis sp. nov. from Mexico. Fifteen previously used names are considered valid, three new synonyms are proposed: A. liogaster Bates (= A. edwardsi Chapin syn. nov. = A. hoguei Cartwright and Spangler syn. nov.), A. wenzelii Horn (= A. rudellus Fall, syn. nov.). New state records are presented for A. spretulus (Haldeman) (Washington) and A. cognatus (LeConte) (Indiana, Missouri, and Mississippi). The taxa are diagnosed, keyed and illustrated; available biological information and distribution data are given. Key words: Scarabaeidae, Aphodiinae, Ataenius strigatus group, new species, taxonomy, New World. Introduction clusters of species that share similar combinations of the external character states, often correlated This is the fifth part of a revision of the New with structures of the male genitalia, but some World species of the genus Ataenius Harold (Steb- species within a group have male genitalia similar nicka 2001, 2002, 2003b, in press) and deals with to those from other species groups. Other problems the A. strigatus group of species widely distributed are connected with a north/south vicariance dem- in the middle and southern United States, Central onstrated by several species, and with extreme and South America.
    [Show full text]
  • May Beetle CP
    Contingency Plan – May beetle (Phyllophaga genus) Industry Biosecurity Plan for the Grains Industry Threat Specific Contingency Plan May beetle Phyllophaga genus Prepared by Rob Weppler and Plant Health Australia September 2008 Disclaimer: The scientific and technical content of this document is current to the date published and all efforts were made to obtain relevant and published information on the pest. New information will be included as it becomes available, or when the document is reviewed. The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only. It is not intended as professional advice on any particular matter. No person should act or fail to act on the basis of any material contained in this publication without first obtaining specific, independent professional advice. Plant Health Australia and all persons acting for Plant Health Australia in preparing this publication, expressly disclaim all and any liability to any persons in respect of anything done by any such person in reliance, whether in whole or in part, on this publication. The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of Plant Health Australia. Page 1 of 24 Contingency Plan – May beetle (Phyllophaga genus) 1 Purpose of this Contingency Plan................................................................................................... 4 2 Pest information/status .................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Pest Details ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]