DOCSLIB.ORG

Stakeholder Dialog Stratgie-Entwicklung Für

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stakeholder Dialog Stratgie-Entwicklung Für STAKEHOLDER DIALOG STRATGIE-ENTWICKLUNG Lindau, Deutschland, 14. November 2012 WORKSHOP Documentation Participants: 49 German speaking participants from NGO´s from Germany, Switzerland, Liechtenstein and Italy. Participants by Organisation: FÜR DEN ALPENRAUM 16 14 12 10 administration, science, enterprises, associations, 8 6 4 2 Participants by background: 0 inistration (national) Public adm 14 (regional) Public administration 12 10 Enterprises 8 6 Universities 4 2 Chambers 0 Economy NGOs Transport Environment Energy Water Tourism Mountains rural area Urban development Spatial Planning Agriculture other Welcome speeches by: Axel Schnell, Stv. Vorstandsmitglied Sparkasse MM-LI-MN Elmar Stegmann, Landrat des Landkreises Lindau Dr. Peter Eggensberger, Bay. Staatsministerium für Umwelt und Gesundheit Introduction speeches: Dr. Peter Eggensberger, Bay. Staatsministerium für Umwelt und Gesundheit: Three initiatives - one aim: „A Strategy for the Alpine Space“ Prof. Dr. Thomas Bausch, Alpenforschungsinstitut: The Expert Study „Strategy development for the Alpine Space“ First reactions from the audience to the introduction: • Question of the relationship of a new strategy paper and the Alpine Convention, which exists since 20 years, however with many fields of activities which have not been implemented yet. Reference to the Alpine Convention as a protective convention for the geographical Alpine perimeter, which is not sufficient for the scale of a regional development strategy • Landowners should be included as actors, without them no strategy can be implemented. Chapter 4 should emphasize this aspect more. • Does the macro region bring unnecessary complexity in the Alpine Space Programme? It is hoped that the process of this new approach of the new discussion also brings a new momentum. • The role of the expert report for the 2014-2020 programming process is seen as incompatible in comparison with the EU objectives and targets. -> While the study has been assigned before publication of the EU draft regulations, the results are actually very close to the 11 thematic objectives. The exact adjustment is in the responsibility of the programme. • Hint that only 80% of the future funding should be dedicated to only 4 thematic objectives: the expert study had the task to explicitly think ahead -> an analysis of the matching fields with EU requirements is already included. • Does a funding programme need to have strategic objectives anyway? -> The Alpine Space Programme as a mere vicarious agent does not make sense, in case of a macro-regional strategy the macro region should be considered for the funding. First Session with three parallel Workshops: Workshop I - Spatial development, Connectivity, Transport • A wish for an “Alpine Transport Strategy” has been expressed. • Mobility is one of the drivers Workshop II - Sustainable use of Resources • The relevance and need for an alpine-wide cooperation is considered to be high in all thematic fields. • The study is too close to economic interests. Environmental aspects must be addressed much stronger. • The topic of energy efficiency must be strengthened, the trans-alpine knowledge transfer is important. • Best practice examples from regional level should be transferred. • Climate targets should be reflected in energy indicators, especially within alpine- relevant topics (e.g. energy and water consumption in skiing areas, wood for construction, wood manufacturing tradition). 2 • Macro regional strategy could form an organisational framework of bottom-up and top- down approaches within the topic of resources. A vertical cooperation throughout the different levels is necessary. • Sustainability in energy production (efficiency, storage), participation is important. Not all potentials are suitable for usage. • Public participation must be considered seriously and not only as a necessary must. • The question of sharing responsibilities is open (e.g. are the Alps ready and willing for the storage of energy?), which compensation models exist? • Question of implementation under current market and competition situation. • Water is considered as resource mainly, must be considered as habitats as well. • The principle of integration must be considered (Art. 11 of AEUV): The requirements of environmental protection must be integrated into the definition and implementation of the Union policies and activities, in particular with a view to promoting sustainable development. Workshop III - Innovation of the Alpine Economy • What is meant here: alpine economy or the economy in the Alpine Space? For the latter, also global players with HQ in the Alpine Space must be considered! • Industry sector seems not to be considered in the study, but has a strong influence. • The current change in the ownership structure which tends to develop to large land ownership implies various impacts and needs to be considered by the study (e.g. non-existent deer hunt leads to tuberculosis of red deer; loss of cattle and changes in agriculture, avalanche danger by over grazing) • Value chain as key element for an increased demand of cooperation (e.g. raw material wood: usage of local resources and knowledge) • High importance of qualification processes to address lack of knowledge and lack of innovation within SME and to enable clustering of SMEs • The value of landscape aesthetics is missing in the report. • The issue of risk capital should be integrated to enhance transnational innovations. • There is a high demand of alpine wide knowledge management and knowledge transfer between research institutions and SME. This calls for structures, institutions, funding. • Why is the issue of tourism mentioned explicitly, even though its economical added value is rather limited (only 5% in Bodensee region). Innovation should not be limited to tourism only. Chapter must be renamed eventually. • Urban-rural cooperation for the marketing of local products. • This Working Group should be renamed into competiveness, innovation and economical added value in the Alpine economy. • Connection to demographic change: economy must accept DC, e.g. approach of residential economy (added value by private consume, tax income by modification of second homes into first residents, development of high quality services requested by new residents). Second Session with three parallel Workshops: Workshop IV - Strengthening of the regional economy • This topic should gain more relevance, as green economy is one of the three strategic main objectives. • There is the problematic of missing funding for the regionalisation of the economy despite of known demand of cooperation. An Alpine fund is necessary (see WS III) • Items 11 & 12 should be considered jointly (e.g. wood and economic value chain). • Ad 13: alternative lifestyles and financial models for structures of public interest must be considered beyond regions. • The consideration of skills shortage is missing in the report. There is an alpine specific problem of high competition of the regions, which needs to be addressed. • New ways of economical development should be sought, not only focus on the existing resources. 3 • A strong overlapping with WS III was detected: regional cycles, demographic change, skills shortage and brain drain, urban-rural relationship related problems are issues in each Workshop. These topics must be clustered. The fields of actions are too broad but at the moment too sectorial. • Cooperative competition region as one approach: cooperation to the outside, competition to the inside. Workshop V - the future alpine society • The social action ability should have the highest importance. All further issues are sub issues. • It has been proposed to develop a standard for living quality. • The cooperation of urban regions is of high importance especially in this field. Workshop VI - Ecology and Sustainable Development • Alternative phrasing for action field 18: sustainable land use in the EU eligibility area. The phrasing for action field 19 is questioned due to its unclear term of growth and economy. Proposal: management of the ecological pressure due to growth. Generally, nature protection should be enhanced. • Action field 17: based on the counter current principle, it is not only necessary to sensitise the EU for the local level but also to raise more awareness and understanding of EU objectives at the local level and by the local actors. • Action field 20: preservation of alpine river systems shall be included. • Proposal for a new action field 21: climate protection and adaption (as cross-cutting action field over all action fields). • Action field 17 is of high importance. Very important is the alpine specific implementation of the EU environmental objectives on local level. The European responsibility of the Alps should be highlighted. Furthermore, urban-rural relationships are of high importance as well. • Action field 18: the spatial pressure has been identified as important issue. • Action field 19: it has been noted that the preservation of the landscapes is unrealistic. The management of landscape changes and the safeguarding of ecosystem services are much more realistic (Action field 20). • Further transnational cooperation is seen within the management of hunting (adaption of ecological potentials) and in the creation of green infrastructure. • Overall, a strong connection to Workshop 2 (resources) was identified. Summary of the Workshops In the single workshops, similar topics were raised repeatedly. This should be considered within the clustering. Which direction
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EU Strategy for the Alpine Region
    BRIEFING EU strategy for the Alpine region SUMMARY Launched in January 2016, the European Union strategy for the Alpine Region (EUSALP) is the fourth and most recent macro-regional strategy to be set up by the European Union. One of the biggest challenges facing the seven countries and 48 regions involved in the EUSALP is that of securing sustainable development in the macro-region, especially in its resource-rich, but highly vulnerable core mountain area. The Alps are home to a vast array of animal and plant species and constitute a major water reservoir for Europe. At the same time, they are one of Europe's prime tourist destinations, and are crossed by busy European transport routes. Both tourism and transport play a key role in climate change, which is putting Alpine natural resources at risk. The European Parliament considers that the experience of the EUSALP to date proves that the macro-regional concept can be successfully applied to more developed regions. The Alpine strategy provides a good example of a template strategy for territorial cohesion; as it simultaneously incorporates productive areas, mountainous and rural areas, and some of the most important and highly developed cities in the EU. Although there is a marked gap between urban and rural mountainous areas, the macro-region shows a high level of socio-economic interdependence, confirmed by recent research. Disparities (in terms of funding and capacity) between participating countries, a feature that has caused challenges for other EU macro-regional strategies, are less of an issue in the Alpine region, but improvements are needed and efforts should be made in view of the new 2021-2027 programming period.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards More Resilient Economies in Alpine Regions Riccardo Brozzi, Lucija Lapuh, Janez Nared, Thomas Streifeneder D E R a N
    Acta geographica Slovenica, 55-2, 2015, 339–350 towaRds MoRe Resilient eConoMies in alPine Regions Riccardo Brozzi, Lucija Lapuh, Janez Nared, Thomas Streifeneder D E R A N Z E N A J Regional economies are confronted with constant transformation, which is even more radical in times of economic crises. The picture shows the Schiffbau – the premises of former shipbuilding company in Zurich that were transformed into theatre. Riccardo Brozzi, Lucija Lapuh, Janez Nared, Thomas Streifeneder, Towards more resilient economies in Alpine regions Towards more resilient economies in Alpine regions DOI: http: //dx.doi.org/10.3986/AGS.916 UDC: 911.3:338.124.4(234.3) COBISS: 1.01 ABSTRACT: The economic crisis the world has faced since 2007 has had devastating effects on many regions to various degrees. How regions respond to economic shock depends on regional economic structure and performance, administrative capacity, resources, human capital, social capital, and other factors, and is per - ceived as resilience: the ability of a regional economy to withstand, absorb, or overcome an external economic stress. Because one of the future strategic goals for the Alpine Space Programme area is fostering its resilience, we studied the performance of Alpine regions in the pre - and post -crisis period in order to assess the effects of the economic crisis and to provide basic directions on how to make the Alps more resilient in the future . The results have revealed differences among three selected groups of regions as well as some country -spe - cific characteristics of the regional response that can generally be seen in the weaker performance of some Italian and Slovenian regions.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Strategy for the Alpine Region (EUSALP) ITALIAN PRESIDENCY
    February 2019 EU Strategy for the Alpine Region (EUSALP) ITALIAN PRESIDENCY 2019 Work Programme 1. Introduction: The Alpine Region1 The Alpine Region is among the largest natural, economic and productive areas in Europe, with over 80 million inhabitants, and among the most attractive tourist regions, welcoming millions of guests per year. While trade, businesses and industry in the Alpine Region are concentrated in the main areas of settlement on the outskirts of the Alps and in the large Alpine valleys along the major traffic routes, over 40 % of the Region is not or not permanently inhabited. Due to the Alpine Region’s unique geographic and natural characteristics, it is particularly affected by several of the challenges arising in the 21st century: Economic globalisation requires sustainable and continuously high competitiveness as well as the capacity to innovate; Demographic change leads to an ageing population and outward migration of highly qualified labour; Global climate change already has noticeable effects on the environment, biodiversity and living conditions for the inhabitants of the Alpine Region; A reliable and sustainable energy supply must be ensured in the parts of the Region which are difficult to access; As a transit region in the heart of Europe and due to its geographic features, the Alpine Region requires sustainable and custom-fit traffic concepts; The Alpine Region is to be preserved as a unique natural and cultural environment. 1 This description part comes from the Bavarian 2017 Work Programme 1 February 2019 The different characteristics of peripheral areas, centers of different sizes, and metropolises, require a dialogue on a basis of equality and the development of an alliance aimed at sustainable development while respecting its needs.
    [Show full text]
  • BHL-Europe Promotion Kit
    D5.6 ECP-2008-DILI-518001 BHL-Europe BHL-Europe promotion kit Deliverable number D5.6 Dissemination level Public Delivery date 5 November 2009 Status Final Author(s) Jiří Kvaček eContentplus This project is funded under the eContentplus programme1, a multiannual Community programme to make digital content in Europe more accessible, usable and exploitable. 1 OJ L 79, 24.3.2005, p. 1. 1/5 5 November 2009 D5.6 0 Document History 0.1 Contributors Person Partner Jiří Kvaček NMP Pavel Douša NMP Henning Scholz MfN 0.2 Revision History Revision Date Author Version Change Reference & Summary 12 October 2009 Jiří Kvaček 0.1 Initial draft of D5.6 3 November 2009 Jiří Kvaček 0.2 Revision based on CWG comments 4 November 2009 Jiří Kvaček 0.3 Revision based on comments by H. Scholz 5 November 2009 Jiří Kvaček 1.0 Final version 0.3 Reviewers and Approvals This document requires the following reviews and approvals. Name Position Signature on approval Date Version Henning Scholz BHL-Europe PCO 5 November 2009 1.0 0.4 Distribution This document has been distributed to: Group Date of issue Version CWG 12 October 2009 0.1 BHL-Europe consortium 29 October 2009 0.1 BHL-Europe consortium 12 November 2009 1.0 2/5 5 November 2009 D5.6 Table of contents 0 DOCUMENT HISTORY...................................................................................................................................2 0.1 Contributors .......................................................................................................................................2 0.2 Revision
    [Show full text]
  • ESPON-TITAN Case Studies Report Alpineregion
    CASE STUDY REPORT // ESPON-TITAN Territorial Impacts of Natural Disasters Alpine Region Applied Research // June 2021 This ESPON-TITAN is conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The ESPON EGTC is the Single Beneficiary of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. The Single Operation within the programme is implemented by the ESPON EGTC and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund, the EU Member States, the United Kingdom and the Partner States, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. This delivery does not necessarily reflect the opinions of members of the ESPON 2020 Monitoring Committee. Coordination: Carolina Cantergiani, Efren Feliu, TECNALIA Research & Innovation, Spain Authors Mark Fleischhauer, Polina Mihal, Maren Blecking, Pauline Fehrmann, Stefan Greiving Advisory group Project Support Team: Adriana May, Lombardy Region (Italy), Marcia Van Der Vlugt, Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations, Spatial Development Directorate (the Netherlands) ESPON EGTC: Zintis Hermansons (Project Expert), Caroline Clause (Financial Expert) Acknowledgements This case study was supported by interviews with and feedback from the following regional stakeholders whom we would like to thank for their cooperation: Blanka Bartol (Ministrstvo za okolje in proctor, Direktorat za prostor, graditev in stanovanja, Slovenia; Member of the Slovenian delegation in the Permanent Committee of the Alpine Convention), Kilian Heil (Bundesministerium für Landwirtschaft, Regionen und Tourismus, Sektion III – Forstwirtschaft und Nachhaltigkeit, Abteilung III/4 – Wildbach- und Lawinenverbauung und Schutzwaldpolitik, Austria; Member of the EUSALP Action Group 8; Member of the Natural Hazards Platform (PLANALP) of the Alpine Convention), Jože Papež (Hidrotehnik Vodnogospodarsko podjetje d.o.o., Slovenia; Member of the Natural Hazards Platform (PLANALP) of the Alpine Convention; Member of the EUSALP Action Group 8), Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Transnational and Interregional Programmes of European Territorial Cooperation in Slovenia 2014—2020
    TRANSNATIONAL AND INTERREGIONAL PROGRAMMES OF EUROPEAN TERRITORIAL COOPERATION IN SLOVENIA 2014—2020 INTERREG V: CENTRAL EUROPE , ALPINE SPACE , MEDITERRANEAN , ADRION , DANUBE , INTERREG EUROPE , URBACT *, ESPON *, INTERACT *National Authority in Slovenia is Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning I. Slovenia in transnational and interregional programmes of European Territorial Cooperation 2014—2020 In the programming period 2014–2020, Slovenia cooperates in five transnational programmes (Alpine Space, Central Europe, Mediterranean, Danube and Adriatic-Ionian Programme - ADRION ) and in four interregional programmes ( INTERACT III , INTERREG EUROPE , URBACT III , ESPON 2020). There is EUR 1.386 million from European Regional Development Fund ( ERDF ) available within these programmes in the entire programming period ( EUR 872 million for transnational programmes and EUR 514 million for interregional programmes). Funds are granted by the managing authorities based on transnational and interregional calls for proposals and decisions of monitoring committees, which include representatives of all participating countries. The selection process is supported by national coordination. ERDF co-financing for Slovenian project partners is up to 85% of eligible expenditure and is based on reimbursements, allowing time for national verification of eligible costs, ac- tivities and public procurement procedures. ERDF funds are transferred directly to the lead partners, which in turn make transfers to the project partners. All managing authorities and other joint structures of transnational and interregional programmes are located outside Slovenia. The Government Office for Development and European Cohesion Policy acts as National Authority and National Control. In case of URBACT III and ESPON 2020, these roles are performed by the Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpine Space Programme
    Alpine Space programme Terms of reference 3rd call for project proposals Aim of the programme The Alpine Space programme is an EU transnational cooperation programme to support sustainable regional development in the Alpine region. Contributing to the EU 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, it provides stakeholders with a framework to develop, test, implement and coordinate new solutions. Depending on the availability of funds the programme regularly launches calls for project proposals. These calls are based on the programme strategy as defined in the cooperation programme while more detailed information about each call is available in the terms of reference. In the present terms of reference the expectations of the programme and the general requirements for applications for the third call are described to enable the applicants to better target their proposals. The programme has four funding priorities: innovative Alpine Space, low carbon Alpine Space, liveable Alpine Space and well-governed Alpine Space. Call 3 priorities The present third call for project proposals is open throughout priorities 1-4 of the cooperation programme available on the programme website: www.alpine-space.eu. In order to better target the projects to the programme, without being exclusive, the following topics indicate those thematic fields of priorities 1-4 where projects are particularly welcome. Priority 1: Innovative Alpine Space Specific objective: Improve the framework conditions for innovation in the Alpine Space Developing new or better value chains in key strategic sectors as identified in the relevant smart specialisation strategies. Improving the framework conditions for cooperation in the field of circular economy and eco-innovation, with specific regard to high-technological applications and eco- innovation services.
    [Show full text]
  • Interreg Alpine Space Programme 2021-2027 - Public Consultation
    Interreg Alpine Space programme 2021-2027 - Public consultation Introduction Voice your opinion! Help us shape the new Interreg Alpine Space programme 2021-2027. We are presenting you the latest draft of the programme and the study made on its expected impact on the environment. We warmly invite you to provide your opinion on the programme overall structure and the objectives selected, and how they support the aim of preserving and valorising the unique environment of the Alpine region. Find below: the further elaborated draft of the Interreg Alpine Space programme 2021-2027 and the executive summary of the draft report on the strategic environmental assessment - SEA. The consultation is open from 13 July to 14 September 2020. You can check the full questionnaire of this consultation here. You will need approximately 15 to 30 minutes to contribute to the consultation, depending on the number of topics you choose to comment on. You can save your progress at any time and come back to it later by selecting "Save and continue" on the top right corner of each page. The consultation is available in English language and we kindly invite you to provide your comments in English. Thank you for your cooperation! The Interreg Alpine Space programme About: Interreg Alpine Space is a European transnational cooperation programme for the Alpine region. Since 2000, it contributes to a better quality of life in the Alps. The programme co-finances projects to make the region more innovative, develop low carbon solutions, valorise the cultural and natural heritage, and improve transnational governance… through transnational cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Land, Projects and People
    2007-2013 Land, projects and 2011people Close-up Alpine Space on a few The mid-term conference projects Pg. 9 to 16 Pg. 4 to 8 & 17 to 19 Jean-François CarenCo • ’Préfet’ of the Rhone-Alps region Cooperation is the cornerstone of regional development Various European programmes have been set up for regional authorities, socio-economic structures and associations, helping them to develop both their own individual advantages as well as synergies between them, reinforcing their strategic development. An essential contribution, with cross-border and international cooperation, promoting harmonious development of our regions and turning them into competitive, sustainable places to live. With this in mind, the Alpine Space programme has kept its promises, supporting numerous high-quality projects aimed at improving individual regions, involving more than 51 million from the European Regional THE ALPINE SPACE Development Fund (ERDF). PROGRAMME HAS The outlook is positive: the various project organisations have been able to develop efficient, UPHELD ITS PROMISES pertinent networks, profiting from the experiences and best practices of one another, introducing BY SUPPORTING truly innovative actions. A GREat NUMBER From a French point of view, Europe is supporting and financing various projects aimed at providing OF HIGH-QUALITY economic development, innovation and improving transport, as well as limiting the effects of climate PROJECTS change by developing, for example, energy-efficiency in Alpine Water Management projects. As coordinating ‘Préfet’, responsible for the French end of the Alpine Space programme, I was delighted to play host to a mid-term conference, highlighting the achievements of the 25 projects currently underway whilst helping us prepare, alongside our colleagues from Austria, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, Slovenia and Liechtenstein, the future of this cooperation zone beyond 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • A L P I N E S P a C E P R O G R a M Me
    A l p i n e S p a c e P r o g r a m me INTERREG III B Community Initiative Final Version, November 2001 Alpine Space Programme Community-Initiative INTERREG III B CONTENT 1. STRUCTURE OF THE PROGRAMME AREA........................................... 9 1.1 General characteristics.................................................................................................9 1.1.1 The Alpine Space in its European dimension ....................................................9 1.1.2 Experience of transnational co-operation in the Alpine Space .........................13 1.1.3 Coherence of the Operational Programme with other EU programmes and policies ...............................................................................................................15 1.2 The Alpine Space – an area of economic growth and regional disparities ..................23 1.3 The situation of transport and technical infrastructure ................................................31 1.4 Tourism in the Alpine Space – economic prerequisite for survival of several areas..........................................................................................................................34 1.5 The Alpine Space as a centre for education, research and development ...................35 1.6 Agriculture and forestry: tradition and globalisation ....................................................36 1.7 The natural and cultural heritage: expression of alpine identity ..................................38 1.8 Natural resources and risks - not only an inner alpine
    [Show full text]
  • Alpine Space “Permanet” Handbook to Establish Alpine Permafrost
    Alpine Space “PermaNet” Permafrost long-term monitoring Network Handbook to establish alpine permafrost monitoring network July 2011 WP4 – Permafrost monitoring network (WP coordinator: Arpa Piemonte, Italy) FINAL REPORT Handbook to establish alpine permafrost monitoring network Output 4.2: Recommendations for building up national monitoring networks Output 4.4: handbook for the installation and maintenance of an Alpine-wide permafrost monitoring network Edited by Paro, Luca (Dept. Geologia e dissesto, Arpa Piemonte, Italy) Guglielmin, Mauro (DBSF, Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, Italy) Sponsored and supported by Alpine Space Project “PermaNet – Permafrost long-term monitoring network” (http://www.permanet-alpinespace.eu/) The PermaNET project is part of the European Territorial Cooperation and co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) in the scope of the Alpine Space Programme (www.alpine-space.eu). Lead Partner: - Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano, Uff. Geologia e Prove Materiali (I) Project Partner: - Bayerisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Abteilung 10: Geologischer Dienst, Wirtschaftsgeologie, Bodenschutz (D) - Arpa Piemonte – Geologia e dissesto (I) - Regione Autonoma Valle d’Aosta, Assessorato territorio, Ambiente e Opere Pubbliche, Dipartimento Territorio, Ambiente e Risorse Idriche, Direzione Ambiente (I) - Regione del Veneto, Direzione Geologia e Attività Estrattive, Servizio Geologia (I) - Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Protezione Civile e Tutela del Territorio, Servizio Geologico (I) - Österreichisches Bundesministerium
    [Show full text]
  • Final Conference 20 - 22 September 2011 Old University Graz, Austria
    Agenda Final Conference 20 - 22 September 2011 Old University Graz, Austria www.alpwaterscarce.eu 2011 20th September – Moderation Hans Zojer 09:00 - 10:00 Registration and Coffee on Arrival 10:00 Welcoming address Siegfried Nagl – Mayor of Graz, Austria September Eric Brunat – Vice President for International Affairs, University of Savoie, France Christian Salletmaier – Managing Authority, Alpine Space Programme 22 - Gunther Suette – Local Organiser, Regional Government of Styria 20 11:00 Presentation of the Alpine Space Programme Thomas Fleury, Joint Technical Secretariat, Germany 11:30 Hard and soft climate change facts for the past two centuries in the greater alpine region of Europe Agenda Agenda Reinhard Böhm, Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics ZAMG, Austria Conference 12:00 - 13:00 Lunch Break 13:00 The impact of climate change on the hydrology of high elevation Alpine catchments: what we know and what we don‘t Final Francesca Pellicciotti, Institute of Environmental Engineering, ETH Zürich, Switzerland 13:30 What could be the water use issues in the Alps in the mid-XXIst century? Emmanuel Reynard, University of Lausanne, Institute of Geography, Switzerland 14:00 Alp-Water-Scarce – general overview on the project Daniela Hohenwallner, EDYTEM, University of Savoie, France 14:15 The aims and objectives of Alp-Water-Scarce and the concept of an “Early Warning System” Georges-Marie Saulnier, EDYTEM, University of Savoie, France 14:45 The Alp-Water-Scarce Pilot Sites and the atlas Hermann Klug, Peter Zalavari & Barbara Hochwimmer, Z-GIS, University of Salzburg, Austria 15:00 - 15:30 Coffee Break 15:30 River Basin Management in Slovenia: Development of a decision support system for licensing water uses Ales Bizjak, Institute for Water of the Republic of Slovenia, Slovenia 15:45 The Development of water management in the Province of Styria under consideration of actual climate change studies Johann Wiedner, Government of Styria, Austria 16:00 Adapting water management of mountain areas to climate change.
    [Show full text]