DOCSLIB.ORG

The Macroevolutionary Dynamics of Symbiotic and Phenotypic Diversification in Lichens

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Macroevolutionary Dynamics of Symbiotic and Phenotypic Diversification in Lichens The macroevolutionary dynamics of symbiotic and phenotypic diversification in lichens Matthew P. Nelsena,1, Robert Lückingb, C. Kevin Boycec, H. Thorsten Lumbscha, and Richard H. Reea aDepartment of Science and Education, Negaunee Integrative Research Center, The Field Museum, Chicago, IL 60605; bBotanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany; and cDepartment of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 Edited by Joan E. Strassmann, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, and approved July 14, 2020 (received for review February 6, 2020) Symbioses are evolutionarily pervasive and play fundamental roles macroevolutionary consequences of ant–plant interactions (15–19). in structuring ecosystems, yet our understanding of their macroevo- However, insufficient attention has been paid to one of the most lutionary origins, persistence, and consequences is incomplete. We iconic examples of symbiosis (20, 21): Lichens. traced the macroevolutionary history of symbiotic and phenotypic Lichens are stable associations between a mycobiont (fungus) diversification in an iconic symbiosis, lichens. By inferring the most and photobiont (eukaryotic alga or cyanobacterium). The pho- comprehensive time-scaled phylogeny of lichen-forming fungi (LFF) tobiont supplies the heterotrophic fungus with photosynthetically to date (over 3,300 species), we identified shifts among symbiont derived carbohydrates, while the mycobiont provides the pho- classes that broadly coincided with the convergent evolution of phy- tobiont minerals, water, and a conducive growing environment in logenetically or functionally similar associations in diverse lineages the form of a thallus. Collectively, lichens dominate ∼7% of the (plants, fungi, bacteria). While a relatively recent loss of lichenization earth’s terrestrial surface (22), and play important roles in hy- in Lecanoromycetes was previously identified, our work instead sug- drological (23) and biogeochemical cycles through weathering gests lichenization was abandoned far earlier, interrupting what had previously been considered a direct switch between trebouxiophy- (24, 25), carbon uptake, and nitrogen-fixation (24, 26), as well as cean and trentepohlialean algal symbionts. Consequently, some of albedo modification (27, 28) and food or nesting sources for the most diverse clades of LFF are instead derived from nonliche- diverse animals (29). Lichen thalli may be large or small and nized ancestors and re-evolved lichenization with Trentepohliales harbor a eukaryotic green alga (from the order Trentepohliales or algae, a clade that also facilitated lichenization in unrelated lineages class Trebouxiophyceae) or cyanobacteria as the primary photo- of LFF. Furthermore, while symbiont identity and symbiotic pheno- biont. Compared to microlichens (typically forming small, crust- EVOLUTION type influence the ecology and physiology of lichens, they are not like [crustose] or microlobed [squamulose] thalli), macrolichens correlated with rates of lineage birth and death, suggesting more (typically forming larger, leaf-like [foliose] or tufted [fruticose] complex dynamics underly lichen diversification. Finally, diversifica- thalli) may have a competitive advantage due to their ability to tion patterns of LFF differed from those of wood-rotting and ecto- overgrow microlichens. However, physiological and ecological mycorrhizal taxa, likely reflecting contrasts in their fundamental requirements associated with carbon uptake, light capture, hy- biological properties. Together, our work provides a timeline for dration, and desiccation may restrict their distribution and ulti- the ecological contributions of lichens, and reshapes our understand- mately influence diversification rates. Similarly, cyanobacteria may ing of symbiotic persistence in a classic model of symbiosis. supply a constant source of fixed N to the mycobiont, and ulti- mately to the ecosystem, but are ecologically restricted due to symbiosis | macroevolution | diversification their dependence on liquid water for photosynthesis (30–33). ymbiotic associations permeate the Tree of Life and form the Significance Sbasis upon which diverse ecosystems are founded (1–5). Over geological timescales, interacting lineages may evolve mutualistic associations with one another from free-living or symbiotic an- Symbioses are evolutionarily and ecologically widespread, yet cestors (6); however, since these require services from all part- we lack a robust understanding of their origins, losses, and ners to increase the overall fitness, they are vulnerable over macroevolutionary consequences. We traced the evolution of partner choice and phenotype in lichens—a classic model of evolutionary time to the evolution of cheaters or other forms of symbiosis—and revealed shifts among symbiont groups and destabilization (7, 8). Thus, mutualistic associations may be evo- phenotypic evolution. Symbiont switches broadly coincided with lutionarily transient; they may be replaced with a functionally sim- the convergent acquisition of similar partners by divergent ilar but phylogenetically distinct symbiont, or the symbiosis may be clades. Fungi abandoned the lichen habit far earlier than previ- abandoned entirely (8–10). Ascertaining the timing and pathways by ously understood, and subsequently reacquired it with algae which interactions originate and are severed may yield insight into that have frequently facilitated independent fungal transitions factors facilitating these transitions. Mutualistic interactions may to lichenization. Finally, diversification in lichenized fungi was also directly or indirectly regulate macroevolutionary clade dy- not strictly modulated by partner choice or phenotype, and namics; however, predicting their effects on the macroevolutionary – differed from other fungi, suggesting complex and variable dy- dynamics of these clades is not straightforward (11 13). Which namics within lichen fungi and across fungal nutritional modes. symbiont a mutualistic lineage associates with may also influence its fitness, geographic range, or contribute to density-dependent pro- Author contributions: M.P.N., R.L., C.K.B., H.T.L., and R.H.R. designed research; M.P.N. cesses, and ultimately shape lineage diversification. For example, performed research; M.P.N. analyzed data; and M.P.N., R.L., C.K.B., H.T.L., and R.H.R. symbionts with greater ecological flexibility or resistance to extinc- wrote the paper. tion may confer reduced extinction and higher net diversification to The authors declare no competing interest. their associated lineages (13). To better understand the complex This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. macroevolutionary dynamics of biotic associations, comparative Published under the PNAS license. analysis of especially large and old clades can be particularly re- 1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: [email protected]. vealing about the timeline and pathways by which they are gained This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/ and lost. Such studies have revealed shifts in the type of root doi:10.1073/pnas.2001913117/-/DCSupplemental. symbiosis (10), hemipteran–bacterial endosymbionts (14), and the www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.2001913117 PNAS Latest Articles | 1of9 Downloaded by guest on September 27, 2021 Most lichens occur as bipartite (two partner) associations be- or near the family Stictidaceae (Ostropomycetidae), resulting in tween a mycobiont and photobiont; however, some lichen- the evolution of saprotrophic or plant parasitic lineages (41, 42). forming fungi (LFF) regularly form complex tripartite (three Among lichens, lichen-forming algae (LFA) vary in their eco- partner) associations that include a green algal photobiont, and logical and geographic preferences, as well as the number of LFF cyanobacteria that are typically restricted to cephalodia, small species supported; consequently, LFA may be expected to indi- structures in or on the thallus in which cyanobacterial function is rectly regulate the diversification dynamics of LFF (43). Simi- restricted to nitrogen fixation and carbon is obtained from the larly, the ecological and geographic preferences of a lichen are green algal photobiont via the mycobiont (34). In contrast to also shaped by thallus growth form (which is determined by the these complex associations, the lichen-forming habit has been LFF), which may also confer competitive advantages that in- abandoned entirely in some fungi. One of the best-known ex- crease fitness. Consistent with this is the enhanced diversification amples of this occurs in the fungal class Lecanoromycetes, the observed in several macrolichen lineages of LFF (44). Together, most diverse (>14,000 species, 80% of known LFF) and one of these evolutionary shifts in photobiont association and growth the oldest clades of LFF (35–40). Lichenization has been con- form may affect the evolutionary trajectories of these lineages tinuously maintained from, or prior to, the most recent common and their ecological contributions. Consequently, identifying the ancestor (MRCA) of Lecanoromycetes, but recently lost within evolutionary pathways underlying these transitions, and their Fig. 1. Time-scaled ML phylogeny of 3,373 Lecanoromycetes fungi. Concentric rings surrounding the phylogeny indicate binary character state for growth form (inner), primary photobiont (middle), and presence of cephalodia (outer) for individual species. Branches are
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Lichens' Microbiota, Still a Mystery?
    fmicb-12-623839 March 24, 2021 Time: 15:25 # 1 REVIEW published: 30 March 2021 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.623839 The Lichens’ Microbiota, Still a Mystery? Maria Grimm1*, Martin Grube2, Ulf Schiefelbein3, Daniela Zühlke1, Jörg Bernhardt1 and Katharina Riedel1 1 Institute of Microbiology, University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany, 2 Institute of Plant Sciences, Karl-Franzens-University Graz, Graz, Austria, 3 Botanical Garden, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany Lichens represent self-supporting symbioses, which occur in a wide range of terrestrial habitats and which contribute significantly to mineral cycling and energy flow at a global scale. Lichens usually grow much slower than higher plants. Nevertheless, lichens can contribute substantially to biomass production. This review focuses on the lichen symbiosis in general and especially on the model species Lobaria pulmonaria L. Hoffm., which is a large foliose lichen that occurs worldwide on tree trunks in undisturbed forests with long ecological continuity. In comparison to many other lichens, L. pulmonaria is less tolerant to desiccation and highly sensitive to air pollution. The name- giving mycobiont (belonging to the Ascomycota), provides a protective layer covering a layer of the green-algal photobiont (Dictyochloropsis reticulata) and interspersed cyanobacterial cell clusters (Nostoc spec.). Recently performed metaproteome analyses Edited by: confirm the partition of functions in lichen partnerships. The ample functional diversity Nathalie Connil, Université de Rouen, France of the mycobiont contrasts the predominant function of the photobiont in production Reviewed by: (and secretion) of energy-rich carbohydrates, and the cyanobiont’s contribution by Dirk Benndorf, nitrogen fixation. In addition, high throughput and state-of-the-art metagenomics and Otto von Guericke University community fingerprinting, metatranscriptomics, and MS-based metaproteomics identify Magdeburg, Germany Guilherme Lanzi Sassaki, the bacterial community present on L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Puzzle of Lichen Symbiosis
    Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 1503 The puzzle of lichen symbiosis Pieces from Thamnolia IOANA ONUT, -BRÄNNSTRÖM ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6214 ISBN 978-91-554-9887-0 UPPSALA urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-319639 2017 Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Lindhalsalen, EBC, Norbyvägen 14, Uppsala, Thursday, 1 June 2017 at 09:15 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Faculty examiner: Associate Professor Anne Pringle (University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Botany). Abstract Onuț-Brännström, I. 2017. The puzzle of lichen symbiosis. Pieces from Thamnolia. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 1503. 62 pp. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. ISBN 978-91-554-9887-0. Symbiosis brought important evolutionary novelties to life on Earth. Lichens, the symbiotic entities formed by fungi, photosynthetic organisms and bacteria, represent an example of a successful adaptation in surviving hostile environments. Yet many aspects of the lichen symbiosis remain unexplored. This thesis aims at bringing insights into lichen biology and the importance of symbiosis in adaptation. I am using as model system a successful colonizer of tundra and alpine environments, the worm lichens Thamnolia, which seem to only reproduce vegetatively through symbiotic propagules. When the genetic architecture of the mating locus of the symbiotic fungal partner was analyzed with genomic and transcriptomic data, a sexual self-incompatible life style was revealed. However, a screen of the mating types ratios across natural populations detected only one of the mating types, suggesting that Thamnolia has no potential for sexual reproduction because of lack of mating partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Thamnolia Subuliformis – (Ehrh.) Culb
    SPECIES: Scientific [common] Thamnolia subuliformis – (Ehrh.) Culb. [Whiteworm lichen] Forest: Salmon–Challis National Forest Forest Reviewer: Jessica M Dhaemers; Brittni Brown; John Proctor, Rose Lehman Date of Review: 10/13/2017; 13 February 2018; 15 March 2018 Forest concurrence (or NO recommendation if new) for inclusion of species on list of potential SCC: (Enter Yes or No) FOREST REVIEW RESULTS: 1. The Forest concurs or recommends the species for inclusion on the list of potential SCC: Yes___ No_X__ 2. Rationale for not concurring is based on (check all that apply): Species is not native to the plan area _______ Species is not known to occur in the plan area _______ Species persistence in the plan area is not of substantial concern ___X____ FOREST REVIEW INFORMATION: 1. Is the Species Native to the Plan Area? Yes _X_ No___ If no, provide explanation and stop assessment. 2. Is the Species Known to Occur within the Planning Area? Yes _X _ No___ If no, stop assessment. Table 1. All Known Occurrences, Years, and Frequency within the Planning Area Year Number of Location of Observations (USFS Source of Information Observed Individuals District, Town, River, Road Intersection, HUC, etc.) 1987 Not Middle Fork Ranger District IDFG Element Occurrence EO reported Along the Middle Fork Salmon Number: 1 River, across from Hospital Bar; EO_ID: 3589 in Frank Church–River of No Old EO_ID: 9675 Return Wilderness and Middle Fork Salmon River Wild and Scenic River Corridor (Wild classification); moss-covered, north-facing small cliff band, 4,100 feet in elevation 1996 Not Lost River Ranger District Consortium of North American reported Vicinity of Mill Lake in Mill Lake Lichen Herbarium.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evolving Phylogenetically Based Taxonomy of Lichens and Allied Fungi
    Opuscula Philolichenum, 11: 4-10. 2012. *pdf available online 3January2012 via (http://sweetgum.nybg.org/philolichenum/) An evolving phylogenetically based taxonomy of lichens and allied fungi 1 BRENDAN P. HODKINSON ABSTRACT. – A taxonomic scheme for lichens and allied fungi that synthesizes scientific knowledge from a variety of sources is presented. The system put forth here is intended both (1) to provide a skeletal outline of the lichens and allied fungi that can be used as a provisional filing and databasing scheme by lichen herbarium/data managers and (2) to announce the online presence of an official taxonomy that will define the scope of the newly formed International Committee for the Nomenclature of Lichens and Allied Fungi (ICNLAF). The online version of the taxonomy presented here will continue to evolve along with our understanding of the organisms. Additionally, the subfamily Fissurinoideae Rivas Plata, Lücking and Lumbsch is elevated to the rank of family as Fissurinaceae. KEYWORDS. – higher-level taxonomy, lichen-forming fungi, lichenized fungi, phylogeny INTRODUCTION Traditionally, lichen herbaria have been arranged alphabetically, a scheme that stands in stark contrast to the phylogenetic scheme used by nearly all vascular plant herbaria. The justification typically given for this practice is that lichen taxonomy is too unstable to establish a reasonable system of classification. However, recent leaps forward in our understanding of the higher-level classification of fungi, driven primarily by the NSF-funded Assembling the Fungal Tree of Life (AFToL) project (Lutzoni et al. 2004), have caused the taxonomy of lichen-forming and allied fungi to increase significantly in stability. This is especially true within the class Lecanoromycetes, the main group of lichen-forming fungi (Miadlikowska et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Pertusaria Georgeana Var. Goonooensis Is Described As New to Science
    The striking rust-red colour of the surface of Porpidia macrocarpa is thought to result from a high “luxury” accumulation of iron. The species is known from New Zealand and Australia in the Southern Hemisphere and from North America, Europe, and Asia in the Northern Hemisphere. 1 mm CONTENTS ADDITIONAL LICHEN RECORDS FROM NEW ZEALAND Fryday, AM (47) Coccotrema corallinum Messuti and C. pocillarium (C.E.Cumm.) Brodo .... 3 ADDITIONAL LICHEN RECORDS FROM AUSTRALIA Archer, AW (63) Graphis cleistoblephara Nyl. and G. plagiocarpa Fée ........................... 6 Elix, JA (64) ......................................................................................................................... 8 RECENT LITERATURE ON AUSTRALASIAN LICHENS ......................................... 16 ANNOUNCEMENT AND NEWS 18th meeting of Australasian lichenologists 2008 ...................................................... 17 Ray Cranfield awarded Churchill Fellowship ............................................................ 17 ARTICLES Archer, AW; Elix, JA—Two new species in the Australian Graphidaceae (lichenized Ascomycota) ................................................................................................................... 18 Elix, JA—Further new crustose lichens (Ascomycota) from Australia ................... 21 Elix, JA; Archer, AW—A new variety of Pertusaria georgeana (lichenized Ascomy- cota) containing a new depside .................................................................................. 26 Elix, JA—A new species of Xanthoparmelia
    [Show full text]
  • Lichens of Alaska's South Coast
    United States Department of Agriculture Lichens of Alaska’s South Coast Forest Service R10-RG-190 Alaska Region Reprint April 2014 WHAT IS A LICHEN? Lichens are specialized fungi that “farm” algae as a food source. Unlike molds, mildews, and mushrooms that parasitize or scavenge food from other organisms, the fungus of a lichen cultivates tiny algae and / or blue-green bacteria (called cyanobacteria) within the fabric of interwoven fungal threads that form the body of the lichen (or thallus). The algae and cyanobacteria produce food for themselves and for the fungus by converting carbon dioxide and water into sugars using the sun’s energy (photosynthesis). Thus, a lichen is a combination of two or sometimes three organisms living together. Perhaps the most important contribution of the fungus is to provide a protective habitat for the algae or cyanobacteria. The green or blue-green photosynthetic layer is often visible between two white fungal layers if a piece of lichen thallus is torn off. Most lichen-forming fungi cannot exist without the photosynthetic partner because they have become dependent on them for survival. But in all cases, a fungus looks quite different in the lichenized form compared to its free-living form. HOW DO LICHENS REPRODUCE? Lichens sexually reproduce with fruiting bodies of various shapes and colors that can often look like miniature mushrooms. These are called apothecia (Fig. 1) and contain spores that germinate and Figure 1. Apothecia, fruiting grow into the fungus. Each bodies fungus must find the right photosynthetic partner in order to become a lichen. Lichens reproduce asexually in several ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Lichen 101: What an Arborist Needs to Know About Lichen
    Lichen 101: What An Arborist Needs To Know About Lichen Joe Murray Consulting Arborist/Educator Williamsville, Virginia You are here "When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe." Lynchburg, Virginia South Shields, England Burnsville, Virginia Burnsville, Virginia Burnsville, Virginia Crustose Foliose Fruticose Knockan Crag, Scotland Burnsville, Virginia Tree Lungwort (Lobaria pulmonaria) Burnsville, Virginia Sugar Maple (Acer saccharum) Burnsville, Virginia Burnsville, Virginia Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) Burnsville, Virginia White Oak (Quercus alba) Burnsville, Virginia Pitch Pine (Pinus rigida) Burnsville, Virginia Burnsville, Virginia Internal Age & Composition & Growth of Trunk State of Tree Quality of Soil Air Pollution Moisture Regime (Acid Precipitation) Human Climate (Arson, Vandalism) Exposure Fire, Snow, Frost (Sunlight) Disease Exposure (Wind) Local Environment Elevation (forest or field) Influence from Animals & Microflora Moss Lichens Fungi Algae Tree Architecture (Crown Shape) Burnsville, Virginia Tree Architecture (Branch Orientation) Norway Spruce (Picea abies) Pitch Pine (Pinus rigida) Burnsville, Virginia Tree Architecture (Branch Orientation) Norway Spruce (Picea abies) Pitch Pine (Pinus rigida) Stemflow Burnsville, Virginia Burnsville, Virginia http://385867928462337283.weebly.com/precambrian.html http://dapa.ciat.cgiar.org/carbon-sequestration-one-true-green-revolution/ http://www.anselm.edu/homepage/jpitocch/genbi101/ecology2communities.html Knockan
    [Show full text]
  • A Field Guide to Biological Soil Crusts of Western U.S. Drylands Common Lichens and Bryophytes
    A Field Guide to Biological Soil Crusts of Western U.S. Drylands Common Lichens and Bryophytes Roger Rosentreter Matthew Bowker Jayne Belnap Photographs by Stephen Sharnoff Roger Rosentreter, Ph.D. Bureau of Land Management Idaho State Office 1387 S. Vinnell Way Boise, ID 83709 Matthew Bowker, Ph.D. Center for Environmental Science and Education Northern Arizona University Box 5694 Flagstaff, AZ 86011 Jayne Belnap, Ph.D. U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center Canyonlands Research Station 2290 S. West Resource Blvd. Moab, UT 84532 Design and layout by Tina M. Kister, U.S. Geological Survey, Canyonlands Research Station, 2290 S. West Resource Blvd., Moab, UT 84532 All photos, unless otherwise indicated, copyright © 2007 Stephen Sharnoff, Ste- phen Sharnoff Photography, 2709 10th St., Unit E, Berkeley, CA 94710-2608, www.sharnoffphotos.com/. Rosentreter, R., M. Bowker, and J. Belnap. 2007. A Field Guide to Biological Soil Crusts of Western U.S. Drylands. U.S. Government Printing Office, Denver, Colorado. Cover photos: Biological soil crust in Canyonlands National Park, Utah, cour- tesy of the U.S. Geological Survey. 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................... 4 How to use this guide .................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................... 4 Crust composition ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Higher-Level Phylogenetic Classification of the Fungi
    mycological research 111 (2007) 509–547 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mycres A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi David S. HIBBETTa,*, Manfred BINDERa, Joseph F. BISCHOFFb, Meredith BLACKWELLc, Paul F. CANNONd, Ove E. ERIKSSONe, Sabine HUHNDORFf, Timothy JAMESg, Paul M. KIRKd, Robert LU¨ CKINGf, H. THORSTEN LUMBSCHf, Franc¸ois LUTZONIg, P. Brandon MATHENYa, David J. MCLAUGHLINh, Martha J. POWELLi, Scott REDHEAD j, Conrad L. SCHOCHk, Joseph W. SPATAFORAk, Joost A. STALPERSl, Rytas VILGALYSg, M. Catherine AIMEm, Andre´ APTROOTn, Robert BAUERo, Dominik BEGEROWp, Gerald L. BENNYq, Lisa A. CASTLEBURYm, Pedro W. CROUSl, Yu-Cheng DAIr, Walter GAMSl, David M. GEISERs, Gareth W. GRIFFITHt,Ce´cile GUEIDANg, David L. HAWKSWORTHu, Geir HESTMARKv, Kentaro HOSAKAw, Richard A. HUMBERx, Kevin D. HYDEy, Joseph E. IRONSIDEt, Urmas KO˜ LJALGz, Cletus P. KURTZMANaa, Karl-Henrik LARSSONab, Robert LICHTWARDTac, Joyce LONGCOREad, Jolanta MIA˛ DLIKOWSKAg, Andrew MILLERae, Jean-Marc MONCALVOaf, Sharon MOZLEY-STANDRIDGEag, Franz OBERWINKLERo, Erast PARMASTOah, Vale´rie REEBg, Jack D. ROGERSai, Claude ROUXaj, Leif RYVARDENak, Jose´ Paulo SAMPAIOal, Arthur SCHU¨ ßLERam, Junta SUGIYAMAan, R. Greg THORNao, Leif TIBELLap, Wendy A. UNTEREINERaq, Christopher WALKERar, Zheng WANGa, Alex WEIRas, Michael WEISSo, Merlin M. WHITEat, Katarina WINKAe, Yi-Jian YAOau, Ning ZHANGav aBiology Department, Clark University, Worcester, MA 01610, USA bNational Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information,
    [Show full text]
  • Learn About Lichen Students Will Learn How to Identify 3 Forms of Lichen
    Learn about Lichen Students will learn how to identify 3 forms of lichen. Magnifying glass, clipboard with lichen sheet (page 3) and pencil. Grades: 5-7 30-60 minutes Activity sheet included Introduction Lichen is composed of 2 or more organisms: an algae, cyanobacteria and a fungus living together in a symbiotic mutual partnership (see page 2 for a glossary of all bolded words). Lichen covers 6% of our planet with over 17,000 different species of lichen worldwide. Approximately 1,100 species of lichen are found in British Columbia. Lichen can provide food and habitat for many animals and can help break down rocks to become soil. The fungus provides physical structure and water: the algae and cyanobacteria, using photosynthesis, produce food. Lichen is an excellent indicator of air quality, making it a bioindicator. These hearty pioneer species can be found on every continent on earth. Have you noticed any lichen in your favourite spot in nature? Directions • With your clipboard, pencil, lichen sheet and magnifying glass, head outside to your favourite place in nature. • Look for the three basic forms of lichen: Fruticose (shrubby and branch-like) Crustose (flat and crusty/dusty) and Foliose (leaf-like and has 2 sides). Fruticose Crustose Foliose • Note all the different colours, textures and forms you find on your sheet and try to draw the different forms of lichen you find. So what about moss? Lichen and moss are often mistaken for one another. While certain types of lichen might resemble moss, they are very different. Mosses are defined as simple plants with the most basic of root structures, leaves, and stems.
    [Show full text]
  • Extended Phylogeny and a Revised Generic Classification of The
    The Lichenologist 46(5): 627–656 (2014) 6 British Lichen Society, 2014 doi:10.1017/S002428291400019X Extended phylogeny and a revised generic classification of the Pannariaceae (Peltigerales, Ascomycota) Stefan EKMAN, Mats WEDIN, Louise LINDBLOM and Per M. JØRGENSEN Abstract: We estimated phylogeny in the lichen-forming ascomycete family Pannariaceae. We specif- ically modelled spatial (across-site) heterogeneity in nucleotide frequencies, as models not incorpo- rating this heterogeneity were found to be inadequate for our data. Model adequacy was measured here as the ability of the model to reconstruct nucleotide diversity per site in the original sequence data. A potential non-orthologue in the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) of Degelia plumbea was observed. We propose a revised generic classification for the Pannariaceae, accepting 30 genera, based on our phylogeny, previously published phylogenies, as well as available morphological and chemical data. Four genera are established as new: Austroparmeliella (for the ‘Parmeliella’ lacerata group), Nebularia (for the ‘Parmeliella’ incrassata group), Nevesia (for ‘Fuscopannaria’ sampaiana), and Pectenia (for the ‘Degelia’ plumbea group). Two genera are reduced to synonymy, Moelleropsis (included in Fuscopannaria) and Santessoniella (non-monophyletic; type included in Psoroma). Lepido- collema, described as monotypic, is expanded to include 23 species, most of which have been treated in the ‘Parmeliella’ mariana group. Homothecium and Leightoniella, previously treated in the Collemataceae, are here referred to the Pannariaceae. We propose 41 new species-level combinations in the newly described and re-circumscribed genera mentioned above, as well as in Leciophysma and Psoroma. Key words: Collemataceae, lichen taxonomy, model adequacy, model selection Accepted for publication 13 March 2014 Introduction which include c.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy, Phylogeny and Biogeography of the Lichen Genus Peltigera in Papua New Guinea
    Fungal Diversity Taxonomy, phylogeny and biogeography of the lichen genus Peltigera in Papua New Guinea Sérusiaux, E.1*, Goffinet, B.2, Miadlikowska, J.3 and Vitikainen, O.4 1Plant Taxonomy and Conservation Biology Unit, University of Liège, Sart Tilman B22, B-4000 Liège, Belgium 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, 75 North Eagleville Road, Storrs CT 06269-3043 USA 3Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0338, USA 4Botanical Museum (Mycology), P.O. Box 7, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland Sérusiaux, E., Goffinet, B., Miadlikowska, J. and Vitikainen, O. (2009). Taxonomy, phylogeny and biogeography of the the lichen genus Peltigera in Papua New Guinea. Fungal Diversity 38: 185-224. The lichen genus Peltigera is represented in Papua New Guinea by 15 species, including 6 described as new for science: P. cichoracea, P. didactyla, P. dolichorhiza, P. erioderma, P. extenuata, P. fimbriata sp. nov., P. granulosa sp. nov., P. koponenii sp. nov., P. montis-wilhelmii sp. nov., P. nana, P. oceanica, P. papuana sp. nov., P. sumatrana, P. ulcerata, and P. weberi sp. nov. Peltigera macra and P. tereziana var. philippinensis are reduced to synonymy with P. nana, whereas P. melanocoma is maintained as a species distinct from P. nana pending further studies. The status of several putative taxa referred to P. dolichorhiza s. lat. in the Sect. Polydactylon remains to be studied on a wider geographical scale and in the context of P. dolichorhiza and P. neopolydactyla. The phylogenetic affinities of all but one regional species (P. extenuata) are studied based on inferences from ITS (nrDNA) sequence data, in the context of a broad taxonomic sampling within the genus.
    [Show full text]