DOCSLIB.ORG

Thamnolia Subuliformis – (Ehrh.) Culb

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SPECIES: Scientific [common] Thamnolia subuliformis – (Ehrh.) Culb. [Whiteworm lichen] Forest: Salmon–Challis National Forest Forest Reviewer: Jessica M Dhaemers; Brittni Brown; John Proctor, Rose Lehman Date of Review: 10/13/2017; 13 February 2018; 15 March 2018 Forest concurrence (or NO recommendation if new) for inclusion of species on list of potential SCC: (Enter Yes or No) FOREST REVIEW RESULTS: 1. The Forest concurs or recommends the species for inclusion on the list of potential SCC: Yes___ No_X__ 2. Rationale for not concurring is based on (check all that apply): Species is not native to the plan area _______ Species is not known to occur in the plan area _______ Species persistence in the plan area is not of substantial concern ___X____ FOREST REVIEW INFORMATION: 1. Is the Species Native to the Plan Area? Yes _X_ No___ If no, provide explanation and stop assessment. 2. Is the Species Known to Occur within the Planning Area? Yes _X _ No___ If no, stop assessment. Table 1. All Known Occurrences, Years, and Frequency within the Planning Area Year Number of Location of Observations (USFS Source of Information Observed Individuals District, Town, River, Road Intersection, HUC, etc.) 1987 Not Middle Fork Ranger District IDFG Element Occurrence EO reported Along the Middle Fork Salmon Number: 1 River, across from Hospital Bar; EO_ID: 3589 in Frank Church–River of No Old EO_ID: 9675 Return Wilderness and Middle Fork Salmon River Wild and Scenic River Corridor (Wild classification); moss-covered, north-facing small cliff band, 4,100 feet in elevation 1996 Not Lost River Ranger District Consortium of North American reported Vicinity of Mill Lake in Mill Lake Lichen Herbarium. 2017. Research Natural Area, around Thamnolia subuliformis (Ehrh.) Year Number of Location of Observations (USFS Source of Information Observed Individuals District, Town, River, Road Intersection, HUC, etc.) the upper, smaller lakes; on soil, W.L. Culb., Detailed Collection 5,900 feet in elevation Record Information. Internet website: http://lichenportal.org/portal/ collections/individual/index.php? occid=2581947&clid=0. Accessed on September 20, 2017. a. Are all Species Occurrences Only Accidental or Transient? Yes___ No_ X _ If yes, document source for determination and stop assessment. b. For species with known occurrences on the Forest since 1990, based on the number of observations and/or year of last observation, can the species be presumed to be established or becoming established in the plan area? Yes_X__ No___ If no, provide explanation and stop assessment c. For species with known occurrences on the Forest predating 1990, does the weight of evidence suggest the species still occurs in the plan area? Yes__ No___ Provide explanation for determination: N/A. There is one occurrence recorded since 1990. If determination is no, stop assessment d. Map 1, Whiteworm lichen occurrences on the Salmon–Challis National Forest (IDFG. 2017. Idaho Fish and Wildlife Information System, Species Diversity Database, Idaho Natural Heritage Data. Accessed February 27, 2017.) 3. Is There Substantial Concern for the Species’ Capability to persist Over the Long-term in the Plan Area Based on Best Available Scientific Information? Table 2. Status summary based on existing conservation assessments Entity Status/Rank (include definition if Other) Global Rank G3G5—Vulnerable (At moderate risk of extinction due to a restricted range, relatively few populations [often 80 or fewer], recent and widespread declines, or other factors) to Secure (Common; widespread and abundant)1 State Rank S1—Critically imperiled (At very high risk of extinction due to extreme rarity [often 5 or fewer populations], very steep declines, or other factors)1 USDA Forest Region 1: Not listed2 Service Region 4: Not listed3 USDI FWS Not listed as a candidate species4 Other Idaho Native Plant Society: G3G5 S2 RARE5 BLM: Not listed6 1. Idaho Natural Heritage Program. 2016. IDNHP Tracked Plant Species 2016. On file. Accessed January 12, 2018 2. USFS Region 1. 2011. 2011 Sensitive Species List Idaho and Montana. Website: http://fsweb.r1.fs.fed.us/wildlife/wwfrp/TESnew.htm. Accessed January 10, 2017. 3. USFS Region 4. 2016. Proposed, Endangered, Threatened, and Sensitive Species List. On file. Accessed January 11, 2017. 4. USFWS. 2017. Candidate species believed to or known to occur in Idaho. Website: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/reports/species-listed-by-state-report?state=ID&status=candidate. Accessed January 12, 2018. 5. Idaho Native Plant Society. 2018. INPS Plants to Present at 2018 RPC. 2018 Idaho Rare Plant Conference. On file. Accessed March 1, 2018. 6. BLM. 2016. Bureau of Land Management Idaho Special Status Plants List Aug 2016. On file. Accessed 15 January, 2018. Table 3. Status summary based on best available scientific information. Species (Scientific and Common Name): Thamnolia subuliformis (Whiteworm lichen) Criteria Rank Rationale Literature Citations 1 A2 Whiteworm lichen is known from two locations on the Forest, from the Consortium of North American Lichen Distribution on Middle Fork and Lost River Ranger Districts (IDFG Element Occurrence Herbarium. 2017. Thamnolia Salmon–Challis data; Consortium of North American Lichen Herbarium 2017). The subuliformis (Ehrh.) W. L. Culb. National Forest occurrence in the Lost River Ranger District appears to be in typical Internet website: alpine habitat, while the occurrence from the Middle Fork Ranger District http://lichenportal.org/portal/taxa/ind ex.php?taxon=120894. Accessed on appears to be from lower elevation, subalpine forest habitat; this September 20, 2017. occurrence may be at or near the lower elevation limit for this species. Targeted surveys have not been completed for lichen species on the IDFG. 2017. Idaho Fish and Wildlife SCNF. Information System, Species Diversity Database, Idaho Natural Heritage Potential habitat (see Criterion 6) is moderately abundant across the Data. Accessed on February 27, 2017. Forest, but likely patchy and isolated (Rank A). This, and the difficulty in locating and accurately identifying the species, moderates confidence in our understanding of the species distribution on the Forest. Confidence in Rank: High, Medium, or Low 2 C Whiteworm lichen is relatively widely distributed outside of the Forest. Beyer, C. 2009. “Thamnolia Distribution in Within Idaho, the species is also known from the Idaho Panhandle vermicularis, Sponsorship for the CALS surrounding National Forest (IDFG 2017). NatureServe (2017) lists the range within Conservation Committee.” Bulletin of geographic area the US as Idaho and Wyoming, and also in the Canadian provinces of the California Lichen Society 16(2):21- Alberta, Manitoba, Northwest Territories, Nunavut, and Quebec. 26. Consortium of North American Lichen Beyer (2009) reports that the species occurs in the Rocky Mountains and Herbarium. 2017. Thamnolia northern Appalachians. The species also has been reported from Alaska subuliformis (Ehrh.) W. L. Culb. (Walker et al. 2001) and the Cascade Range of Washington State and Internet website: British Columbia (Douglas and Bliss 1977). http://lichenportal.org/portal/taxa/ind ex.php?taxon=120894. Accessed on September 20, 2017. Species (Scientific and Common Name): Thamnolia subuliformis (Whiteworm lichen) Criteria Rank Rationale Literature Citations The Consortium of North American Lichen Herbarium (2017) lists additional international collections of various recognized subspecies from Douglas, G.W., and L.C. Bliss. 1977. Greenland, Europe, Asia, South America, and Australia. “Alpine and High Subalpine Plant Communities of the North Cascades Because this species has a well-reported, wide distribution outside of the Range, Washington and British Columbia.” Ecological Monographs Salmon–Challis National Forest, this criterion was ranked “C.” 47(2):113-150. Confidence in Rank: High, Medium, or Low IDFG. 2017. Idaho Fish and Wildlife Information System, Species Diversity Database, Idaho Natural Heritage Data. Accessed on February 27, 2017. NatureServe. 2017. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Internet website: http://explorer.natureserve.org. Accessed on September 20, 2017. Walker, D.A., J.G. Bockheim, F.S. Chapin III, W. Eugster, F.E. Nelson, and C.L. Ping. 2001. “Calcium-rich tundra, wildlife, and the ‘Mammoth Steppe’.” Quaternary Science Reviews 20(2001):149-163. 3 B Whiteworm lichen is sterile, with no known sexual or vegetative Cassie, D.M. 2006. “Population Dispersal reproductive structures except fragments of thallus branches (i.e., the Structure of Thamnolia subuliformis Capability “body”). In genetic population studies of this and another lichen in and Dicranum elongatum in Manitoba, Canada, Cassie (2006) reported that efficient dispersal may be northeastern coastal regions of possible via wind or animal movement. Wind may transport thallus Wapusk National Park, Manitoba.” Master’s thesis, University of Species (Scientific and Common Name): Thamnolia subuliformis (Whiteworm lichen) Criteria Rank Rationale Literature Citations fragments across low-lying tundra vegetation, and animals (e.g., caribou) Manitoba, Winnipeg. may transport thallus fragments for long distances that adhere to their hooves or fur on their lower legs. Fragments may subsequently be Cassie, D.M., and M.D. Piercey- deposited in other areas, or be washed off in lakes or ponds and get Normore. 2008. “Dispersal in a sterile moved by wave action to other areas. Cassie and Piercey-Normore
Recommended publications
  • Icmadophila Aversa and Piccolia Conspersa, Two Lichen Species New to Bolivia

    Icmadophila Aversa and Piccolia Conspersa, Two Lichen Species New to Bolivia

    Polish Botanical Journal 55(1): 217–221, 2010 ICMADOPHILA AVERSA AND PICCOLIA CONSPERSA, TWO LICHEN SPECIES NEW TO BOLIVIA KARINA WILK Abstract. The species Icmadophila aversa and Piccolia conspersa are reported as new to the lichen biota of Bolivia. The studied material was collected in Madidi National Park (NW Bolivia). The species are briefl y characterized and their ecology and distribution are discussed. Key words: lichenized fungi, new records, Madidi region, Andes, South America Karina Wilk, Laboratory of Lichenology, W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lubicz 46, 31-512 Kraków, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION Bolivia is still one of the countries least studied While studying the material collected in the biologically, but the data already available indi- Madidi region I identifi ed two interesting lichen cate a potentially high level of biodiversity (Ibisch species – Icmadophila aversa and Piccolia con- & Mérida 2004). Knowledge of the cryptogams, spersa. The species are reported here as new to Bo- including lichens, is particularly defi cient (Feuerer livia. Brief descriptions and notes on their ecology et al. 1998). In the last decade, however, licheno- and worldwide distribution are provided. logical studies have progressed in Bolivia. The most recent works have provided many new dis- MATERIAL AND METHODS coveries: records new to the country, continent or Southern Hemisphere, and species new to The study is based on material collected in 2006–2007 in science (e.g., Ferraro 2002; Feuerer & Sipman Madidi National Park. The collection sites are located in 2005; Flakus & Wilk 2006; Flakus & Kukwa 2007; the Cordillera Apolobamba (Fig.
  • The Puzzle of Lichen Symbiosis

    The Puzzle of Lichen Symbiosis

    Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 1503 The puzzle of lichen symbiosis Pieces from Thamnolia IOANA ONUT, -BRÄNNSTRÖM ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6214 ISBN 978-91-554-9887-0 UPPSALA urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-319639 2017 Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Lindhalsalen, EBC, Norbyvägen 14, Uppsala, Thursday, 1 June 2017 at 09:15 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Faculty examiner: Associate Professor Anne Pringle (University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Botany). Abstract Onuț-Brännström, I. 2017. The puzzle of lichen symbiosis. Pieces from Thamnolia. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 1503. 62 pp. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. ISBN 978-91-554-9887-0. Symbiosis brought important evolutionary novelties to life on Earth. Lichens, the symbiotic entities formed by fungi, photosynthetic organisms and bacteria, represent an example of a successful adaptation in surviving hostile environments. Yet many aspects of the lichen symbiosis remain unexplored. This thesis aims at bringing insights into lichen biology and the importance of symbiosis in adaptation. I am using as model system a successful colonizer of tundra and alpine environments, the worm lichens Thamnolia, which seem to only reproduce vegetatively through symbiotic propagules. When the genetic architecture of the mating locus of the symbiotic fungal partner was analyzed with genomic and transcriptomic data, a sexual self-incompatible life style was revealed. However, a screen of the mating types ratios across natural populations detected only one of the mating types, suggesting that Thamnolia has no potential for sexual reproduction because of lack of mating partners.
  • An Evolving Phylogenetically Based Taxonomy of Lichens and Allied Fungi

    An Evolving Phylogenetically Based Taxonomy of Lichens and Allied Fungi

    Opuscula Philolichenum, 11: 4-10. 2012. *pdf available online 3January2012 via (http://sweetgum.nybg.org/philolichenum/) An evolving phylogenetically based taxonomy of lichens and allied fungi 1 BRENDAN P. HODKINSON ABSTRACT. – A taxonomic scheme for lichens and allied fungi that synthesizes scientific knowledge from a variety of sources is presented. The system put forth here is intended both (1) to provide a skeletal outline of the lichens and allied fungi that can be used as a provisional filing and databasing scheme by lichen herbarium/data managers and (2) to announce the online presence of an official taxonomy that will define the scope of the newly formed International Committee for the Nomenclature of Lichens and Allied Fungi (ICNLAF). The online version of the taxonomy presented here will continue to evolve along with our understanding of the organisms. Additionally, the subfamily Fissurinoideae Rivas Plata, Lücking and Lumbsch is elevated to the rank of family as Fissurinaceae. KEYWORDS. – higher-level taxonomy, lichen-forming fungi, lichenized fungi, phylogeny INTRODUCTION Traditionally, lichen herbaria have been arranged alphabetically, a scheme that stands in stark contrast to the phylogenetic scheme used by nearly all vascular plant herbaria. The justification typically given for this practice is that lichen taxonomy is too unstable to establish a reasonable system of classification. However, recent leaps forward in our understanding of the higher-level classification of fungi, driven primarily by the NSF-funded Assembling the Fungal Tree of Life (AFToL) project (Lutzoni et al. 2004), have caused the taxonomy of lichen-forming and allied fungi to increase significantly in stability. This is especially true within the class Lecanoromycetes, the main group of lichen-forming fungi (Miadlikowska et al.
  • The Macroevolutionary Dynamics of Symbiotic and Phenotypic Diversification in Lichens

    The Macroevolutionary Dynamics of Symbiotic and Phenotypic Diversification in Lichens

    The macroevolutionary dynamics of symbiotic and phenotypic diversification in lichens Matthew P. Nelsena,1, Robert Lückingb, C. Kevin Boycec, H. Thorsten Lumbscha, and Richard H. Reea aDepartment of Science and Education, Negaunee Integrative Research Center, The Field Museum, Chicago, IL 60605; bBotanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany; and cDepartment of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 Edited by Joan E. Strassmann, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, and approved July 14, 2020 (received for review February 6, 2020) Symbioses are evolutionarily pervasive and play fundamental roles macroevolutionary consequences of ant–plant interactions (15–19). in structuring ecosystems, yet our understanding of their macroevo- However, insufficient attention has been paid to one of the most lutionary origins, persistence, and consequences is incomplete. We iconic examples of symbiosis (20, 21): Lichens. traced the macroevolutionary history of symbiotic and phenotypic Lichens are stable associations between a mycobiont (fungus) diversification in an iconic symbiosis, lichens. By inferring the most and photobiont (eukaryotic alga or cyanobacterium). The pho- comprehensive time-scaled phylogeny of lichen-forming fungi (LFF) tobiont supplies the heterotrophic fungus with photosynthetically to date (over 3,300 species), we identified shifts among symbiont derived carbohydrates, while the mycobiont provides the pho- classes that broadly coincided with the convergent
  • Pertusaria Georgeana Var. Goonooensis Is Described As New to Science

    Pertusaria Georgeana Var. Goonooensis Is Described As New to Science

    The striking rust-red colour of the surface of Porpidia macrocarpa is thought to result from a high “luxury” accumulation of iron. The species is known from New Zealand and Australia in the Southern Hemisphere and from North America, Europe, and Asia in the Northern Hemisphere. 1 mm CONTENTS ADDITIONAL LICHEN RECORDS FROM NEW ZEALAND Fryday, AM (47) Coccotrema corallinum Messuti and C. pocillarium (C.E.Cumm.) Brodo .... 3 ADDITIONAL LICHEN RECORDS FROM AUSTRALIA Archer, AW (63) Graphis cleistoblephara Nyl. and G. plagiocarpa Fée ........................... 6 Elix, JA (64) ......................................................................................................................... 8 RECENT LITERATURE ON AUSTRALASIAN LICHENS ......................................... 16 ANNOUNCEMENT AND NEWS 18th meeting of Australasian lichenologists 2008 ...................................................... 17 Ray Cranfield awarded Churchill Fellowship ............................................................ 17 ARTICLES Archer, AW; Elix, JA—Two new species in the Australian Graphidaceae (lichenized Ascomycota) ................................................................................................................... 18 Elix, JA—Further new crustose lichens (Ascomycota) from Australia ................... 21 Elix, JA; Archer, AW—A new variety of Pertusaria georgeana (lichenized Ascomy- cota) containing a new depside .................................................................................. 26 Elix, JA—A new species of Xanthoparmelia
  • H. Thorsten Lumbsch VP, Science & Education the Field Museum 1400

    H. Thorsten Lumbsch VP, Science & Education the Field Museum 1400

    H. Thorsten Lumbsch VP, Science & Education The Field Museum 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive Chicago, Illinois 60605 USA Tel: 1-312-665-7881 E-mail: [email protected] Research interests Evolution and Systematics of Fungi Biogeography and Diversification Rates of Fungi Species delimitation Diversity of lichen-forming fungi Professional Experience Since 2017 Vice President, Science & Education, The Field Museum, Chicago. USA 2014-2017 Director, Integrative Research Center, Science & Education, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. Since 2014 Curator, Integrative Research Center, Science & Education, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. 2013-2014 Associate Director, Integrative Research Center, Science & Education, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. 2009-2013 Chair, Dept. of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. Since 2011 MacArthur Associate Curator, Dept. of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. 2006-2014 Associate Curator, Dept. of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. 2005-2009 Head of Cryptogams, Dept. of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. Since 2004 Member, Committee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago. Courses: BIOS 430 Evolution (UIC), BIOS 23410 Complex Interactions: Coevolution, Parasites, Mutualists, and Cheaters (U of C) Reading group: Phylogenetic methods. 2003-2006 Assistant Curator, Dept. of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. 1998-2003 Privatdozent (Assistant Professor), Botanical Institute, University – GHS - Essen. Lectures: General Botany, Evolution of lower plants, Photosynthesis, Courses: Cryptogams, Biology
  • One Hundred New Species of Lichenized Fungi: a Signature of Undiscovered Global Diversity

    One Hundred New Species of Lichenized Fungi: a Signature of Undiscovered Global Diversity

    Phytotaxa 18: 1–127 (2011) ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ Monograph PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2011 Magnolia Press ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) PHYTOTAXA 18 One hundred new species of lichenized fungi: a signature of undiscovered global diversity H. THORSTEN LUMBSCH1*, TEUVO AHTI2, SUSANNE ALTERMANN3, GUILLERMO AMO DE PAZ4, ANDRÉ APTROOT5, ULF ARUP6, ALEJANDRINA BÁRCENAS PEÑA7, PAULINA A. BAWINGAN8, MICHEL N. BENATTI9, LUISA BETANCOURT10, CURTIS R. BJÖRK11, KANSRI BOONPRAGOB12, MAARTEN BRAND13, FRANK BUNGARTZ14, MARCELA E. S. CÁCERES15, MEHTMET CANDAN16, JOSÉ LUIS CHAVES17, PHILIPPE CLERC18, RALPH COMMON19, BRIAN J. COPPINS20, ANA CRESPO4, MANUELA DAL-FORNO21, PRADEEP K. DIVAKAR4, MELIZAR V. DUYA22, JOHN A. ELIX23, ARVE ELVEBAKK24, JOHNATHON D. FANKHAUSER25, EDIT FARKAS26, LIDIA ITATÍ FERRARO27, EBERHARD FISCHER28, DAVID J. GALLOWAY29, ESTER GAYA30, MIREIA GIRALT31, TREVOR GOWARD32, MARTIN GRUBE33, JOSEF HAFELLNER33, JESÚS E. HERNÁNDEZ M.34, MARÍA DE LOS ANGELES HERRERA CAMPOS7, KLAUS KALB35, INGVAR KÄRNEFELT6, GINTARAS KANTVILAS36, DOROTHEE KILLMANN28, PAUL KIRIKA37, KERRY KNUDSEN38, HARALD KOMPOSCH39, SERGEY KONDRATYUK40, JAMES D. LAWREY21, ARMIN MANGOLD41, MARCELO P. MARCELLI9, BRUCE MCCUNE42, MARIA INES MESSUTI43, ANDREA MICHLIG27, RICARDO MIRANDA GONZÁLEZ7, BIBIANA MONCADA10, ALIFERETI NAIKATINI44, MATTHEW P. NELSEN1, 45, DAG O. ØVSTEDAL46, ZDENEK PALICE47, KHWANRUAN PAPONG48, SITTIPORN PARNMEN12, SERGIO PÉREZ-ORTEGA4, CHRISTIAN PRINTZEN49, VÍCTOR J. RICO4, EIMY RIVAS PLATA1, 50, JAVIER ROBAYO51, DANIA ROSABAL52, ULRIKE RUPRECHT53, NORIS SALAZAR ALLEN54, LEOPOLDO SANCHO4, LUCIANA SANTOS DE JESUS15, TAMIRES SANTOS VIEIRA15, MATTHIAS SCHULTZ55, MARK R. D. SEAWARD56, EMMANUËL SÉRUSIAUX57, IMKE SCHMITT58, HARRIE J. M. SIPMAN59, MOHAMMAD SOHRABI 2, 60, ULRIK SØCHTING61, MAJBRIT ZEUTHEN SØGAARD61, LAURENS B. SPARRIUS62, ADRIANO SPIELMANN63, TOBY SPRIBILLE33, JUTARAT SUTJARITTURAKAN64, ACHRA THAMMATHAWORN65, ARNE THELL6, GÖRAN THOR66, HOLGER THÜS67, EINAR TIMDAL68, CAMILLE TRUONG18, ROMAN TÜRK69, LOENGRIN UMAÑA TENORIO17, DALIP K.
  • Lichens and Associated Fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska

    Lichens and Associated Fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska

    The Lichenologist (2020), 52,61–181 doi:10.1017/S0024282920000079 Standard Paper Lichens and associated fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska Toby Spribille1,2,3 , Alan M. Fryday4 , Sergio Pérez-Ortega5 , Måns Svensson6, Tor Tønsberg7, Stefan Ekman6 , Håkon Holien8,9, Philipp Resl10 , Kevin Schneider11, Edith Stabentheiner2, Holger Thüs12,13 , Jan Vondrák14,15 and Lewis Sharman16 1Department of Biological Sciences, CW405, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R3, Canada; 2Department of Plant Sciences, Institute of Biology, University of Graz, NAWI Graz, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria; 3Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA; 4Herbarium, Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA; 5Real Jardín Botánico (CSIC), Departamento de Micología, Calle Claudio Moyano 1, E-28014 Madrid, Spain; 6Museum of Evolution, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 16, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden; 7Department of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen Allégt. 41, P.O. Box 7800, N-5020 Bergen, Norway; 8Faculty of Bioscience and Aquaculture, Nord University, Box 2501, NO-7729 Steinkjer, Norway; 9NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway; 10Faculty of Biology, Department I, Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; 11Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK; 12Botany Department, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany; 13Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK; 14Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic; 15Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic and 16Glacier Bay National Park & Preserve, P.O.
  • <I>Teuvoa Saxicola</I>

    <I>Teuvoa Saxicola</I>

    MYCOTAXON ISSN (print) 0093-4666 (online) 2154-8889 Mycotaxon, Ltd. ©2018 January–March 2018—Volume 133, pp. 79–87 https://doi.org/10.5248/133.79 Teuvoa saxicola and T. alpina spp. nov. and the genus in China Qiang Ren*, Li Hua Zhang, Xue Jiao Hou College of Life Sciences, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China * Correspondence to: [email protected] Abstract—Two new species, Teuvoa saxicola and T. alpina, are described from China. Teuvoa saxicola differs from other Teuvoa species by its saxicolous habitat, and its yellow brown, thick thallus. Teuvoa alpina resembles T. junipericola from western USA, but differs by its smaller ascospores and its higher altitude habitat. The morphological characters of the new species are illustrated. New material is described of T. tibetica, the only species previously recorded from China. The morphological and phylogenetic characteristics of the three species are discussed and compared with similar taxa. Key words—Megasporaceae, Pertusariales, Lobothallia, lichens, taxonomy Introduction The lichen genus Teuvoa Sohrabi & S.D. Leav. (Pertusariales, Megasporaceae) was established based on the analysis of molecular sequence data and morphological characters (Sohrabi & al. 2013). The lichen family Megasporaceae has six genera: Aspicilia, Circinaria, Lobothallia, Megaspora, Sagedia, and Teuvoa (Schmitt & al. 2006, Lumbsch & al. 2007, Nordin & al. 2010, Sohrabi & al. 2013). Phylogenetic analysis by Sohrabi & al. (2013) supports Teuvoa as the sister group to Lobothallia. Teuvoa is characterized by its 8-spored asci, absence of extrolites, rather short conidia and ascospores, lack of a subhypothecial algal layer, and different substratum preferences (Sohrabi & al. 2013). Worldwide, there are three described Teuvoa species: the terricolous T.
  • Winter 2009 the California Lichen Society Seeks to Promote the Appreciation, Conservation and Study of Lichens

    Winter 2009 the California Lichen Society Seeks to Promote the Appreciation, Conservation and Study of Lichens

    Bulletin of the California Lichen Society Volume 16 No. 2 Winter 2009 The California Lichen Society seeks to promote the appreciation, conservation and study of lichens. The interests of the Society include the entire western part of the continent, although the focus is on California. Dues categories (in $US per year): Student and fixed income - $10, Regular - $20 ($25 for foreign members), Family - $25, Sponsor and Libraries - $35, Donor - $50, Benefactor - $100 and Life Membership - $500 (one time) payable to the California Lichen Society, PO Box 7775 #21135 , San Francisco, California 94120-7775. Members receive the Bulletin and notices of meetings, field trips, lectures and workshops. Board Members of the California Lichen Society: President: Erin Martin, shastalichens gmail.com Vice President: Michelle Caisse Secretary: Patti Patterson Treasurer: Cheryl Beyer Editor: Tom Carlberg Committees of the California Lichen Society: Data Base: Bill Hill, chairperson Conservation: Eric Peterson, chairperson Education/Outreach: Erin Martin, chairperson Poster/Mini Guides: Janet Doell, chairperson Events/field trips/workshops: Judy Robertson, chairperson The Bulletin of the California Lichen Society (ISSN 1093-9148) is edited by Tom Carlberg, tcarlberg7 yahoo.com. The Bulletin has a review committee including Larry St. Clair, Shirley Tucker, William Sanders, and Richard Moe, and is produced by Eric Peterson. The Bulletin welcomes manuscripts on technical topics in lichenology relating to western North America and on conservation of the lichens, as well as news of lichenologists and their activities. The best way to submit manuscripts is by e-mail attachments or on a CD in the format of a major word processor (DOC or RTF preferred).
  • Piedmont Lichen Inventory

    Piedmont Lichen Inventory

    PIEDMONT LICHEN INVENTORY: BUILDING A LICHEN BIODIVERSITY BASELINE FOR THE PIEDMONT ECOREGION OF NORTH CAROLINA, USA By Gary B. Perlmutter B.S. Zoology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 1991 A Thesis Submitted to the Staff of The North Carolina Botanical Garden University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Advisor: Dr. Johnny Randall As Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Certificate in Native Plant Studies 15 May 2009 Perlmutter – Piedmont Lichen Inventory Page 2 This Final Project, whose results are reported herein with sections also published in the scientific literature, is dedicated to Daniel G. Perlmutter, who urged that I return to academia. And to Theresa, Nichole and Dakota, for putting up with my passion in lichenology, which brought them from southern California to the Traingle of North Carolina. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………….4 Chapter I: The North Carolina Lichen Checklist…………………………………………………7 Chapter II: Herbarium Surveys and Initiation of a New Lichen Collection in the University of North Carolina Herbarium (NCU)………………………………………………………..9 Chapter III: Preparatory Field Surveys I: Battle Park and Rock Cliff Farm……………………13 Chapter IV: Preparatory Field Surveys II: State Park Forays…………………………………..17 Chapter V: Lichen Biota of Mason Farm Biological Reserve………………………………….19 Chapter VI: Additional Piedmont Lichen Surveys: Uwharrie Mountains…………………...…22 Chapter VII: A Revised Lichen Inventory of North Carolina Piedmont …..…………………...23 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………..72 Appendices………………………………………………………………………………….…..73 Perlmutter – Piedmont Lichen Inventory Page 4 INTRODUCTION Lichens are composite organisms, consisting of a fungus (the mycobiont) and a photosynthesising alga and/or cyanobacterium (the photobiont), which together make a life form that is distinct from either partner in isolation (Brodo et al.
  • Notes, Outline and Divergence Times of Basidiomycota

    Notes, Outline and Divergence Times of Basidiomycota

    Fungal Diversity (2019) 99:105–367 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-019-00435-4 (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,- volV) Notes, outline and divergence times of Basidiomycota 1,2,3 1,4 3 5 5 Mao-Qiang He • Rui-Lin Zhao • Kevin D. Hyde • Dominik Begerow • Martin Kemler • 6 7 8,9 10 11 Andrey Yurkov • Eric H. C. McKenzie • Olivier Raspe´ • Makoto Kakishima • Santiago Sa´nchez-Ramı´rez • 12 13 14 15 16 Else C. Vellinga • Roy Halling • Viktor Papp • Ivan V. Zmitrovich • Bart Buyck • 8,9 3 17 18 1 Damien Ertz • Nalin N. Wijayawardene • Bao-Kai Cui • Nathan Schoutteten • Xin-Zhan Liu • 19 1 1,3 1 1 1 Tai-Hui Li • Yi-Jian Yao • Xin-Yu Zhu • An-Qi Liu • Guo-Jie Li • Ming-Zhe Zhang • 1 1 20 21,22 23 Zhi-Lin Ling • Bin Cao • Vladimı´r Antonı´n • Teun Boekhout • Bianca Denise Barbosa da Silva • 18 24 25 26 27 Eske De Crop • Cony Decock • Ba´lint Dima • Arun Kumar Dutta • Jack W. Fell • 28 29 30 31 Jo´ zsef Geml • Masoomeh Ghobad-Nejhad • Admir J. Giachini • Tatiana B. Gibertoni • 32 33,34 17 35 Sergio P. Gorjo´ n • Danny Haelewaters • Shuang-Hui He • Brendan P. Hodkinson • 36 37 38 39 40,41 Egon Horak • Tamotsu Hoshino • Alfredo Justo • Young Woon Lim • Nelson Menolli Jr. • 42 43,44 45 46 47 Armin Mesˇic´ • Jean-Marc Moncalvo • Gregory M. Mueller • La´szlo´ G. Nagy • R. Henrik Nilsson • 48 48 49 2 Machiel Noordeloos • Jorinde Nuytinck • Takamichi Orihara • Cheewangkoon Ratchadawan • 50,51 52 53 Mario Rajchenberg • Alexandre G.