DOCSLIB.ORG

The Trojan War the Trojan War

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Trojan War the Trojan War The Trojan War The Trojan War • Took place between 1260-1250 B.C. • Archaeological evidence that there was a war, but true cause unknown • Scholars believe the war began over the Greeks and Trojans fighting for control of the trade route between the Aegean Sea and the Black Sea The Trojan War The Beginnings THETIS PELEUS The Bribes I will give I will lead I will make you the the Trojans you lord of most to victory Europe & beautiful against the Asia woman in Greeks the world HERA ATHENA APHRODITE The Judgment of Paris I want the most beautiful woman, duh…. The Cause of the War King Menelaus Queen Helen King of Sparta Hot Babe Is it my fault he left me home alone with his wife? Paris Dumb Guest Greek Warriors Rally Behind Menelaus THE OATH GREATEST WARRIORS OF GREECE Follow Menelaus EXCEPT Get me out of this dress; I want to fight! I don’t want to risk my life for some faithless harlot ODYSSEUS ACHILLES The Greeks Leave for Troy You killed my rabbit, so now Met at Aulis; Artemis angry give me a Couldn’t sail as long as sacrifice! North wind blew Seriously, dad, you let me be The sacrifice of Iphigenia killed so you could conquer Troy? The Warriors GREEK TROJAN ACHILLES HECTOR ODYSSEUS PARIS AGAMEMNON PANDARUS MENELAUS PRINCE AENEAS AJAX DIOMEDES NESTOR PATROCLUS The Gods Take Sides GREEK TROJAN POSEIDON APHRODITE ATHENA APOLLO HERA ARTEMIS ARES ZEUS FAVORED TROJANS BUT STAYED NEUTRAL TO APPEASE HERA The Royal House of Troy PRIAM – King of Troy HECUBA- Queen of Troy HECTOR – Son of Priam and Hecuba PARIS- Son of Priam and Hecuba ANDROMACHE- Hector’s Wife ASTYANAX- Hector’s son PRINCE AENEAS-Son of Aphrodite and a Trojan Prince The Bloody Battle Lasted for 10 years Hand-to-hand combat Went back and forth Periods of temporary truce to bury the dead The Ninth Year Achilles and Agamemnon fight over Briseis Achilles abandons the war Paris and Menelaus duel- Paris flees Agamemnon declares victory for the Greeks until Pandarus restarts the war Zeus helps the Trojans – Greeks are close to fleeing The Ninth Year Agamemnon offers Briseis back; Achilles refuses Patroclus begs Achilles to return to war; Achilles refuses Hector kills Patroclus; Achilles returns to battles to avenge his death Achilles kills Hector Paris kills Achilles The End: Odysseus’ Plan Greeks build hollow horse and hide inside Greeks leave Sinon to convince the Trojans to take the horse into the city Priest Laocoon tries to warn the Trojans; Poseidon sends a serpent to kill Laocoon Greeks enter Troy and wait until night to attack The End: Troy in Flames Greeks attack before Trojans know what is happening Achilles’ son kills Priam Helen is returned to Menelaus Women were taken as slaves, including Queen Hecuba and Princess Andromache Hector’s infant son was thrown from the wall- killed Only Prince Aeneas escaped Homer’s Epic Poems THE ILIAD THE ODYSSEY First written record of Greece Describes the 10 year journey of Odysseus as he tries to return to his Describes the events of 51 days of home, Ithaka, from Troy the last year of war when Achilles kills Hector .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trojan Women: Introduction
    Trojan Women: Introduction 1. Gods in the Trojan Women Two gods take the stage in the prologue to Trojan Women. Are these gods real or abstract? In the prologue, with its monologue by Poseidon followed by a dialogue between the master of the sea and Athena, we see them as real, as actors (perhaps statelier than us, and accoutered with their traditional props, a trident for the sea god, a helmet for Zeus’ daughter). They are otherwise quite ordinary people with their loves and hates and with their infernal flexibility whether moral or emotional. They keep their emotional side removed from humans, distance which will soon become physical. Poseidon cannot stay in Troy, because the citizens don’t worship him any longer. He may feel sadness or regret, but not mourning for the people who once worshiped but now are dead or soon to be dispersed. He is not present for the destruction of the towers that signal his final absence and the diaspora of his Phrygians. He takes pride in the building of the walls, perfected by the use of mason’s rules. After the divine departures, the play proceeds to the inanition of his and Apollo’s labor, with one more use for the towers before they are wiped from the face of the earth. Nothing will be left. It is true, as Hecuba claims, her last vestige of pride, the name of Troy remains, but the place wandered about throughout antiquity and into the modern age. At the end of his monologue Poseidon can still say farewell to the towers.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMENTARY Calchas on the Basis of an Omen Declares That Troy Must
    COMMENTARY 1-20 Calchas on the basis of an omen declares that Troy must be taken by trickery. It is easy to assert 1 that Q. has combined the traditional detail2 of Odysseus' device ofthe Horse with Sinon's claim in Virg. A. 2. 185f. that Calchas 'ordered' the Greeks to build it. Even if the detail is Virg. 's own 3, in Q. Calchas' intervention is grounded in reality, is based on a wholly dif­ ferent set of circumstances, is strategically necessary (an effective method of crushing the stiff opposition put up by the god-fearing Neoptolemos, a motif certainly not of Q. 's own devising: 66-103n. ), and must be viewed against the background of a tradition in which oracles, prophecies and portents abound4 , and in which Calchas came to assume an increasingly dominant role 5 • Q. 's Calchas indeed (for his teaming up with Odysseus cf. the n. on 360-88, § 4 (a) (ii)) is a leading light in decision making both before and after the fall of Troy6 • His Trojan counterpart Helenos, so popular elsewhere, is virtually driven out of the action: he is a fighter viii. 252f., xi. 348f.; a seer, though not explicitly so, only in the chaotic prophecy of Hera at x. 346f. Calchas is on the scene at this point in the saga in Dictys 5. 7: he predicts that Troy will fall into Greek hands on the basis of an omen involving an eagle carrying a victim's entrails. The doubly inept Triph. 172f. is worth a passing glance: the 'aged' Calchas is in the Horse, and in his capacity as a seer he is well aware ( EU Elow~) that the Greeks were at long last going to take Troy.-Triph.
    [Show full text]
  • Dares Phrygius' De Excidio Trojae Historia: Philological Commentary and Translation
    Faculteit Letteren & Wijsbegeerte Dares Phrygius' De Excidio Trojae Historia: Philological Commentary and Translation Jonathan Cornil Scriptie voorgedragen tot het bekomen van de graad van Master in de Taal- en letterkunde (Latijn – Engels) 2011-2012 Promotor: Prof. Dr. W. Verbaal ii Table of Contents Table of Contents iii Foreword v Introduction vii Chapter I. De Excidio Trojae Historia: Philological and Historical Comments 1 A. Dares and His Historia: Shrouded in Mystery 2 1. Who Was ‘Dares the Phrygian’? 2 2. The Role of Cornelius Nepos 6 3. Time of Origin and Literary Environment 9 4. Analysing the Formal Characteristics 11 B. Dares as an Example of ‘Rewriting’ 15 1. Homeric Criticism and the Trojan Legacy in the Middle Ages 15 2. Dares’ Problematic Connection with Dictys Cretensis 20 3. Comments on the ‘Lost Greek Original’ 27 4. Conclusion 31 Chapter II. Translations 33 A. Translating Dares: Frustra Laborat, Qui Omnibus Placere Studet 34 1. Investigating DETH’s Style 34 2. My Own Translations: a Brief Comparison 39 3. A Concise Analysis of R.M. Frazer’s Translation 42 B. Translation I 50 C. Translation II 73 D. Notes 94 Bibliography 95 Appendix: the Latin DETH 99 iii iv Foreword About two years ago, I happened to be researching Cornelius Nepos’ biography of Miltiades as part of an assignment for a class devoted to the study of translating Greek and Latin texts. After heaping together everything I could find about him in the library, I came to the conclusion that I still needed more information. So I decided to embrace my identity as a loyal member of the ‘Internet generation’ and began my virtual journey through the World Wide Web in search of articles on Nepos.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossing the Boundaries in Kushner and Shakespeare Grant Williams, University of Pittsburgh
    Crossing the Boundaries in Kushner and Shakespeare Grant Williams, University of Pittsburgh Both the theater and criticism depends upon the production of the new and the reappropriation of the old. -Charles R. Lyons (97) […] the need to rehearse and renegotiate the relationship with memory and the past is nowhere more specifically expressed in human culture than in theatrical performance. -Marvin Carlson (167) arold Bloom says, “Genre, frequently metaphoric in Shakespeare, is particularly uneasy in Troilus and H Cressida, variously termed satire, comedy, history, tragedy, or what you will” (327). Moving forward to Tony Kushner’s two- part epic, Angels in America, we find another work that refuses simple classification. David Savran says of it, “Angels is a promiscuously complicated play that is very difficult to categorize […] evoking characteristics that are usually associated with both comedy and tragedy” (15). Many of the reasons for their categorical elusiveness obviously differ, but both plays employ an idea of disease as means by which corruption and politics of exclusion are problematized and changed. In Troilus and Cressida, the audience is confronted with an honored society that, underneath a noble façade, possesses a “Most putrefied core” (5.9.1). Shakespeare uses disease as a thematic tool to align theatrical entertainment with society’s own use of marginalization in order to build a connection between the characters onstage and the audience. Kushner uses disease, vis-à-vis the politics surrounding AIDS, as a platform to remedy the historical tendency to marginalize the sick. While Shakespeare’s play can be seen as a dark satire culminating in a spread of corruption, the topos of disease reveals more about the theatre than it does the legend of Troy.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking the Silence of Homer's Women in Pat Barker's the Silence
    International Journal of English Language Studies (IJELS) ISSN: 2707-7578 DOI: 10.32996/ijels Website: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/ijels Breaking the Silence of Homer’s Women in Pat Barker’s the Silence of The Girls Indrani A. Borgohain Ph.D. Candidate, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan Corresponding Author: Indrani A. Borgohain, E-mail: [email protected] ARTICLE INFORMATION ABSTRACT Received: December 25, 2020 Since time immemorial, women have been silenced by patriarchal societies in most, if Accepted: February 10, 2021 not all, cultures. Women voices are ignored, belittled, mocked, interrupted or shouted Volume: 3 down. The aim of this study examines how the contemporary writer Pat Barker breaks Issue: 2 the silence of Homer’s women in her novel The Silence of The Girl (2018). A semantic DOI: 10.32996/ijels.2021.3.2.2 interplay will be conducted with the themes in an attempt to show how Pat Barker’s novel fit into the Greek context of the Trojan War. The Trojan War begins with the KEYWORDS conflict between the kingdoms of Troy and Mycenaean Greece. Homer’s The Iliad, a popular story in the mythological of ancient Greece, gives us the story from the The Iliad, Intertextuality, perspective of the Greeks, whereas Pat Barker’s new novel gives us the story from the Adaptation, palimpsestic, Trojan perspective of the queen- turned slave Briseis. Pat Barker’s, The Silence of the Girls, War, patriarchy, feminism written in 2018, readdresses The Iliad to uncover the unvoiced tale of Achilles’ captive, who is none other than Briseis. In the Greek saga, Briseis is the wife of King Mynes of Lyrnessus, an ally of Troy.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Divine Intervention and Disguise in Homer's Iliad Senior Thesis
    Divine Intervention and Disguise in Homer’s Iliad Senior Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Undergraduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Undergraduate Program in Classical Studies Professor Joel Christensen, Advisor In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts By Joana Jankulla May 2018 Copyright by Joana Jankulla 1 Copyright by Joana Jankulla © 2018 2 Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, Professor Joel Christensen. Thank you, Professor Christensen for guiding me through this process, expressing confidence in me, and being available whenever I had any questions or concerns. I would not have been able to complete this work without you. Secondly, I would like to thank Professor Ann Olga Koloski-Ostrow and Professor Cheryl Walker for reading my thesis and providing me with feedback. The Classics Department at Brandeis University has been an instrumental part of my growth in my four years as an undergraduate, and I am eternally thankful to all the professors and staff members in the department. Thank you to my friends, specifically Erica Theroux, Sarah Jousset, Anna Craven, Rachel Goldstein, Taylor McKinnon and Georgie Contreras for providing me with a lot of emotional support this year. I hope you all know how grateful I am for you as friends and how much I have appreciated your love this year. Thank you to my mom for FaceTiming me every time I was stressed about completing my thesis and encouraging me every step of the way. Finally, thank you to Ian Leeds for dropping everything and coming to me each time I needed it.
    [Show full text]
  • Nick Susa Epic Mythomemology – the Iliad Book 1: Achilles Was Fighting
    Nick Susa Epic Mythomemology – The Iliad Book 1: Achilles was fighting alongside Agamemnon, the King of Argos, during the Trojan war. After winning a battle each was given a war prize, a woman. Achilles was given Briseis, and Agamemnon was given Chryseis. However, the father of Chryseis, Chryses, who was also a priest of Apollo, wasn’t ready to part with his daughter and came with a ransom for his daughter for King Agamemnon. Agamemnon refused the ransom in favor of keeping Chryseis and threatened the priest. Horrified and upset the priest (Chryses) calls upon Apollo and asks him to put a plague upon the Achaean armies, one of which Agamemnon leads. For nine days the armies were struck with a plague, on the tenth Achilles called a meeting to find the reason for the plague. Calchas, a prophet and follower of Apollo, being protected by Achilles, explains that Agamemnon refusing the ransom was the reason for the plague and he must return the girl and make a sacrifice of one hundred cows to Apollo in order to end the plague. Agamemnon decides to appease Apollo, but only if he can take away Achilles war prize, Briseis. Achilles doesn’t believe that Agamemnon should gain Briseis, so the two begin to argue. Achilles decides that he and his men shall not fight in the war because of Agamemnon’s actions. After Agamemnon takes Briseis away, Achilles cries and prays to his mother, Thetis, asking her to have Zeus grant the Achaean armies many loses. Zeus was not around to be asked though, but after twelve days, he returns and promises to Thetis that he will grant the Trojans many victories and the Achaeans many losses.
    [Show full text]
  • Consider Rembrandt's “Aristotle Contemplating the Bust of Homer
    Charles Hill Yale University / Stanford University The Trojan Horse: Grand Strategy and National Identity Consider Rembrandt’s “Aristotle Contemplating the Bust of Homer.” What is he contemplating? How to convey the matters of war and peace, of strategy and humanity found in Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey to Aristotle’s pupil Alexander. Homer’s face and sightless eyes give no clue. Aristotle’s gaze is off into space. His right hand to Homer’s head; his left hand fingers the chain that carries a pendant engraved with the head of Alexander the Great, whose expression we cannot make out. We can imagine the thoughts and words of Homer running like an electric current up to and through the mind of Aristotle, then down and on into the mind and actions of the conqueror of the world. Sometime around the year 345 Aristotle moved to the island of Mytilene where he did biological observation. Then in 343 came the invitation for which he ever after was famed: to come to the court of King Philip II of Macedonia to tutor his son Alexander, who was then thirteen years of age. As one historian put it: A rich romance came to surround that happy coupling of prince and philosopher, and we shall not hope to see through the fog of legend or determine how far Aristotle influenced his ambitious and unlovely charge –– the boy who would become Alexander the Great and rule the world from the Peloponnesus to Persia to the Punjab. So Aristotle was given the opportunity in actuality that Plato only longed for in theory –– to educate a philosopher-king.
    [Show full text]
  • Homer – the Iliad
    HOMER – THE ILIAD Homer is the author of both The Iliad and The Odyssey. He lived in Ionia – which is now modern day Turkey – between the years of 900-700 BC. Both of the above epics provided the framework for Greek education and thought. Homer was a blind bard, one who is a professional story teller, an oral historian. Epos or epic means story. An epic is a particular type of story; it involves one with a hero in the midst of a battle. The subject of the poem is the Trojan War which happened approximately in 1200 BC. This was 400 years before the poem was told by Homer. This story would have been read aloud by Homer and other bards that came after him. It was passed down generation to generation by memory. One can only imagine how valuable memory was during that time period – there were no hard drives or memory sticks. On a tangential note, one could see how this poem influenced a culture; to be educated was to memorize a particular set of poems or stories which could be cross-referenced with other people’s memory of those particular stories. The information would be public and not private. The Iliad is one of the greatest stories ever told – a war between two peoples; the Greeks from the West and the Trojans from the East. The purpose of this story is to praise Achilles. The two worlds are brought into focus; the world of the divine order and the human order. The hero of the story is to bring greater order and harmony between these two orders.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wooden Horse
    THE WOODEN HORSE 0. THE WOODEN HORSE - Story Preface 1. ACHILLES 2. HELEN AND PARIS 3. THE TROJAN WAR 4. THE PLOT THICKENS 5. DEATH OF HECTOR 6. DEATH OF ACHILLES 7. THE WOODEN HORSE 8. RUINS OF TROY AND MYCENAE This vase—from about 675-650 BC—depicts a horse on wheels. If you look closely, you can also see something else: Greeks inside (and outside) the object. Image copyright Mykonos Archeological Museum, all rights reserved, and online via Beazley Archive at Oxford University. Provided here as fair use for educational purposes. Still unable to subdue the Trojans, Odysseus and the Greeks (Achaeans) needed to find a way to surreptitiously enter the fortified town. They learned, from Helenus—a Trojan seer—that in order to defeat Troy, Neoptolemus (Achilles’ son) would have to join the Achaean forces. Helenus also told the Greeks they would not win the war unless they stole the sacred Palladium—a wooden statue of Athena (called Minerva by the Romans)—which was said to have fallen from heaven. As long as that statue stood in Troy, the Greeks could not take the city take the city. On a dark night, Diomedes (with the help of Odysseus) climbed a wall of Troy. Once inside the city, Diomedes stole the Palladium, thereby weakening Troy’s defenses. Epeios (it is said) created a wooden horse big enough to hide many Greek warriors. Leaving the horse outside the gates of Troy, and moving their ships out of view, the Greeks fooled Priam and his subjects into believing their enemies had given up.
    [Show full text]
  • Trojan War - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Trojan War from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia for the 1997 Film, See Trojan War (Film)
    5/14/2014 Trojan War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Trojan War From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For the 1997 film, see Trojan War (film). In Greek mythology, the Trojan War was waged against the city of Troy by the Achaeans (Greeks) after Paris of Troy took Helen Trojan War from her husband Menelaus king of Sparta. The war is one of the most important events in Greek mythology and has been narrated through many works of Greek literature, most notably through Homer's Iliad. The Iliad relates a part of the last year of the siege of Troy; its sequel, the Odyssey describes Odysseus's journey home. Other parts of the war are described in a cycle of epic poems, which have survived through fragments. Episodes from the war provided material for Greek tragedy and other works of Greek literature, and for Roman poets including Virgil and Ovid. The war originated from a quarrel between the goddesses Athena, Hera, and Aphrodite, after Eris, the goddess of strife and discord, gave them a golden apple, sometimes known as the Apple of Discord, marked "for the fairest". Zeus sent the goddesses to Paris, who judged that Aphrodite, as the "fairest", should receive the apple. In exchange, Aphrodite made Helen, the most beautiful Achilles tending the wounded Patroclus of all women and wife of Menelaus, fall in love with Paris, who (Attic red-figure kylix, c. 500 BC) took her to Troy. Agamemnon, king of Mycenae and the brother of Helen's husband Menelaus, led an expedition of Achaean The war troops to Troy and besieged the city for ten years because of Paris' Setting: Troy (modern Hisarlik, Turkey) insult.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Mythology in the Victorian Popular Theatre Edith Hall
    Pre-print of Hall, E. in International Journal of the Classical Tradition, (1998). Classical Mythology in the Victorian Popular Theatre Edith Hall Introduction: Classics and Class Several important books published over the last few decades have illuminated the diversity of ways in which educated nineteenth-century Britons used ancient Greece and Rome in their art, architecture, philosophy, political theory, poetry, and fiction. The picture has been augmented by Christopher Stray’s study of the history of classical education in Britain, in which he systematically demonstrates that however diverse the elite’s responses to the Greeks and Romans during this period, knowledge of the classical languages served to create and maintain class divisions and effectively to exclude women and working-class men from access to the professions and the upper levels of the civil service. This opens up the question of the extent to which people with little or no education in the classical languages knew about the cultures of ancient Greece and Rome. One of the most important aspects of the burlesques of Greek drama to which the argument turned towards the end of the previous chapter is their evidential value in terms of the access to classical culture available in the mid-nineteenth century to working- and lower- middle-class people, of both sexes, who had little or no formal training in Latin or Greek. For the burlesque theatre offered an exciting medium through which Londoners—and the large proportion of the audiences at London theatres who travelled in from the provinces—could appreciate classical material. Burlesque was a distinctive theatrical genre which provided entertaining semi-musical travesties of well-known texts and stories, from Greek tragedy and Ovid to Shakespeare and the Arabian Nights, between approximately the 1830s and the 1870s.
    [Show full text]