DOCSLIB.ORG

Congressional Reoord-House. September 19

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

• i ,, •• - ~- .. •.J ,. - . '\.. ,. .. .. .. - I f 10232 CONGRESSIONAL REOORD-HOUSE. SEPTEMBER 19, Mr. DOLPH. I should like to ask the Senator what he would do in Tu:enty-thfrd Regiment of Infantry. a case where twenty-one terms of the circuit court were provided for Class in a single year and at places some of them 2,000 miles apart. rank. : Mr. .MORGAN. I think there must be twenty-five or thirty in the 46. Cadet Hugh Swain. fifth circuit district down South. I want to relieve against that; I Twenty-fifth Regiment of Infantry. want to have more judges and smaller circuits. 54. Cadet Vernon A. Caldwell. Mr. EV ARTS. I move that the Senate adjourn. The motion was agreed to; and (at 5 o'clock and 33 minutes p. m.) TO BE SECO:ND LIEUTENANT. t I the Senate adjourned until to-morrow, Saturday, September 20, 1890, To date from June 14, 1890. at 12 o'clock m. Twenty-first Regiment of Infani1'y. CON.F'IRMATIONS. 53. Cadet Edmund L. ButU!. Executfre nominations conjil'med by tlte Senate September 19, 1890. TO BE ADDITION AL SECOND LIEUTENANTS. UNITED ST.A.TES CONS1.i'"L. Attached to the cavalry arm. Theodore M. Schleier, of Tennessee, to be consul of the United States To date from June 12, 1890. at Amsterdam. 33. Cadet James J. Hornbrook, to the Second Cavalry. SURVEYOR OF CUSTOMS. 34. Cadet William F. Clark, to the Seventh Cavalry. Charles Scoville, of Indiana, to be surveyor of customs for the port 35. Cadet Samuel G. Jones, jr., to the Fifth Cn.valry. of Evansville, in the State of Indiana. 51. Cadet Orin B. Meyer, to the First Cavalry. POSTl\1.A.STER. To date from June 14, 1890. Charles B. Nunemacher, to be postmaster at Ashland, in the county. 39. Cadet James Madison Andrews, jr., to the Fifth Cavalry. of Clark and State of Kansas. Attached to tlte artillery arm. PROMOTIO:NS IN THE ARMY. To date from June 12, 1890. TO BE SECOND LIEUTENANTS. 5. Cadet Colden L'H. Ruggles, to the First Artillery. 7. Cadet Henry D. Todd, jr., to the Third Artillery. To date from June 12, 1890. 8. Cadet John C. Hennard, to·the First Artillery. Second Regiment of Cat'alry. 9. Cadet James Hamilton, to tbe Second Artillery. Class 10. Cadet Thomas W. Winston, to the Fourth Artillery. rank. 11. Cadet Alfred C. Merillat, to the Fifth Artillery. 18. Cadet Robert B. Wallace. 12. Cadet Maurice G. Krayenbuhl, to the Fourth Artillery. 13. Cadet George Montgomery, to the Second Artillery. Tltird Regiment of Cai:alr-y. 14. Cadet Clint C. Hearn, to the Fourth Artillery. 31. Cadet Frank M. Caldwell. 15. Cadet William C. Davis, to the Fitth Artillery. Fourtli Regiment of Carnlry. 20. Cadet Frank G. Mauldin, to the Third Artillery. 22. Cadet Milton F. Davis. 21. Cadet Daniel W. Ketcham, to the Second Artillery. 23. Cadet William S. McNair, to the Third Artillery. Eigltth R.egiment of Cavalry. I 24: Cadet William J. Snow, to the First Artillery. 19. Cadet Francis C. Marshall. 25. Cadet Geor~e G. Gatley, to the Fifth Artillery. Tenth Regiment of Cavalry. 26. Cadet Tbomas B. Lamoreux, to the Fourth Artillery. ,• . 28. Cadet James A. Ryan. QUARTERMASTER'S DEPARTMENT. 37. Cadet Melvin W. Rowell. First Lieut. William H. Miller, of the First Cavalry, to be assistant 45. Cadet Lawrence J. Fleming. quartermast.er, with the rank of captain. · Second Regiment of Infantry. SECOND REGIMENT OF CA V .ALRY. 17. Cadet Hiram McL. Powell. Additional Second Lieut. James J. Hornbrook, to be second lieuten- Third Regiment of Infa11iry. ant. · FIFTH IlEGDIENT OF CA.VALRY. 40. Cadet Peter Murray. 41. Cadet Paul A. Wolf. Additional Second Lieut. Samuel G. Jones, jr., to be second lieu­ Fourth Regiment of Infantry. tenant. SEVE:NTH REGiltIE.."'\T OF CA V .ALRY. •' 36. Cadet John H. Wholley. F'ifth Regiment of Infanfry. Additional Second Lieut-. William F. Clark, t-0 be second lieutenant. SEVENTEENTH REGnIENT OF L~F.A.:NTRY. ,· 52. Cadet Fronk B. Keech. Simh Regiment of Infantry. Second Lieut. James T. Kerr, regimen1al adjutant, to be first lieu­ . t tenant. ' . 29. Cadet Harry H. Baudholtz. TWENTY-SECO:ND REGIME~"T OF IXFANTRY. Seventh Regiment of Infanfry. Second Lieut. Henry C. Hodges, jr., to be :first lieutenant. 30. Cadet Henry T. Ferguson. TWENTY-FOURTH REGDIEXT OF IXF.A.NTRY. Eighth Regiment of Infa1itry. First Lieut. William H. W. James, to be captain. 48. Cadet Ernest B. Gose. Second Lieut. Joseph B. Batchelor, jr., to be first lieutenant. Ninth Regiment of Infantry. FIFTEE:NTH :REGB!ENT OF L~FA...'iTRY. 49. Cadet Charles C. Clark. Second Lieut. William F. Blauvelt, to be first lieutenant. Twelfth Regiment of Infantry. TWE-.~·FIBST REGDIE..~T OF L~.A.NTRY. 44. Cadet Willis ffiine. Second Lieut. Willson Y. Stamper, to be first lieutenant. Thirteenth Regiment of Infantry. 50. Cadet Joseph C. Fox. Fourteenth Regiment of Infanfry. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. 0 16. Cadet James R. Lindsay. FRIDAY, 27. Cadet Fred W. Sladen. Septemba 19, 1890. Si:rf.eentl• Regiment of Infantry. The House met at 12 o'clock m. Prayer by Rev. J. H. CUTHBERT D.D. • ' 38. Cadet George M. Brown. TlIE JO URN AL. I ' Seventeenth Regirnent of Infantry. - . ) . The SPEAKER. The Clerk will read the Journal of yesterday's 42. Cadet Henry G. Lyon. proceedings. Etgliteenth Regiment of Infantry. Mr. O'FERRALL. I sugp;est that there is no quorum present. I 43. Cadet Geore;e D. Moore. ask that the Speaker ascertain whether there is. 47. Cadet Charles J. Symmonds. The SPEAKER. The gentleman froru Virginia makes the point that there is no quorum present. [The ~peaker proceeded to couni Nineteentl~ Regiment of I11fa11fry. the House.] One hu~dred and sixty-six members are present. The 6. Cadet William 0. John ·on. Clerk will proceed. 32. Cadet Henry G. Learnard. The Journal of yesterday's proceedings was read . .• ... •. :; \ "-:-' I _.• \ .. : ..........· I . , .... \ -· ' . ") ·, .. ,.... 1890. CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE. 10233 The SPEAKER. The question is on the appro'val ot the Journal. Mr. LA FOLLETTE. The language that you quote is not the lan­ ·. Mr. CRISP. I object to the approval, and desire to correct the Jour­ guage in this RECORD. nal. Yesterday while the House was under a call, the call having Mr. CRISP. It is certainly the language of the RECORD that I have disclosed the presence of more than a quorum, the Speaker, ;vithout before me. If there is a difference-- any suggestion from any member on the floor, directed the Clerk to Mr. LA FOLLETTE. The language of the Speaker was, "It can­ call the roll upon the question which was pending at the time the be done without objection." '\ : : . want of a quorum was disclosed. To that proceeding I interposed an Mr. CRISP. I read that. ._ ·,., ... objection. So far as I have now gone, the Journal states what took Mr. LA FOLLEITE. I understood you to say, " It can be done by place. The Chair theh determined that such a proceeding might be unanimous consent." had by unanimous consent (although no unanimous consent had been Mr. CRISP. The Speaker said, "It can be done without objection," asked or given),and inquired whether "the gentlemanfrom Georgia" and rny reply, as reported in the RECORD, is, ''Why, of course I ob­ [Mr. CRISP] objected. "The gentleman from Georgia" did object. ject." But my recollection of the colloquy is that the Speaker asked I then understood tbe Speaker to hold that in that condition of affairs the question, "Does the gentleman object?" and my response was, the proceeding proposed was not in order. That, Mr. Speaker, does "Why, of course I object." But I appeal to the official notes of the not appear on the Journal. No ruling of the Speaker on the subject Reporters to show what the statement was, because the statement of the appears on the Journal, if I heard it correctly. I ask the Clerk to RECORD now makes my reply rath~ irrelevant and strained. When turn for a moment to that part of the Journal and see whether I am the Speaker asked, "Does the gentfeman object?" my natural reply not correct. was, ''Why, of conrse I object." But when the Speaker says, "It The SPEAKER. It does not appear ou the Journal, and should not, can be done without objection," the reply was not so na.toralj so that the Chair thinks. there bas been some failure to give an exact ·statement of what took Mr. CRISP. Then, Mr. Speaker, I move to amenu the Journal by ~~ ' making it appear that the Speaker sustained the objection-- Mr. BOUTELLE. What is the specific criticism the gentleman The SPEAKER. The gentlem~n will furnish his amendment in makes? writing. · Mr. CRISP. My point is that the record of what took place is not Mr. ALLEN, of Michigan (while Mr. CRISP was reducing bis amend­ entirely correct, and hence that it will not do to appeal to the RECORD ment to writing). A parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Speaker: How long to show what actuaJJy took place. must the House wait for a member to reduce a matter to writing? Can A MEMBER. It is a question, apparently, of punctuation. ,.· t we not proceed with business? Mr. BOUTELLE. But in what way does the ge13tlemari conrend Mr. CRISP (after a further pause) sent to the desk his proposed that it is incorrect? Does the gentleman state that what the Speaker ,· •' amendment. said is not accurately quoted, or what he said? The SPEAKER. The gentleman from Georgia proposes an amend­ Mr. CRISP. I do not say that it is inaccnrare as to what I said, but ment to the Journal, which the Clerk will read.
Recommended publications
  • Our Arctic Nation a U.S

    Our Arctic Nation a U.S

    Connecting the United States to the Arctic OUR ARCTIC NATION A U.S. Arctic Council Chairmanship Initiative Cover Photo: Cover Photo: Hosting Arctic Council meetings during the U.S. Chairmanship gave the United States an opportunity to share the beauty of America’s Arctic state, Alaska—including this glacier ice cave near Juneau—with thousands of international visitors. Photo: David Lienemann, www. davidlienemann.com OUR ARCTIC NATION Connecting the United States to the Arctic A U.S. Arctic Council Chairmanship Initiative TABLE OF CONTENTS 01 Alabama . .2 14 Illinois . 32 02 Alaska . .4 15 Indiana . 34 03 Arizona. 10 16 Iowa . 36 04 Arkansas . 12 17 Kansas . 38 05 California. 14 18 Kentucky . 40 06 Colorado . 16 19 Louisiana. 42 07 Connecticut. 18 20 Maine . 44 08 Delaware . 20 21 Maryland. 46 09 District of Columbia . 22 22 Massachusetts . 48 10 Florida . 24 23 Michigan . 50 11 Georgia. 26 24 Minnesota . 52 12 Hawai‘i. 28 25 Mississippi . 54 Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska. Photo: iStock.com 13 Idaho . 30 26 Missouri . 56 27 Montana . 58 40 Rhode Island . 84 28 Nebraska . 60 41 South Carolina . 86 29 Nevada. 62 42 South Dakota . 88 30 New Hampshire . 64 43 Tennessee . 90 31 New Jersey . 66 44 Texas. 92 32 New Mexico . 68 45 Utah . 94 33 New York . 70 46 Vermont . 96 34 North Carolina . 72 47 Virginia . 98 35 North Dakota . 74 48 Washington. .100 36 Ohio . 76 49 West Virginia . .102 37 Oklahoma . 78 50 Wisconsin . .104 38 Oregon. 80 51 Wyoming. .106 39 Pennsylvania . 82 WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE AN ARCTIC NATION? oday, the Arctic region commands the world’s attention as never before.
  • Record of the Organizations Engaged in the Campaign, Siege, And

    Record of the Organizations Engaged in the Campaign, Siege, And

    College ILttirarjj FROM THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT ' THROUGH £> VICKSBURG NATIONAL MILITARY PARK COMMISSION. RECORD OF THE ORGANIZATIONS ENGAGED IN THE CAMPAIGN, SIEGE, AND DEFENSE OF VICKSBURG. COMPILED FROM THE OFFICIAL RECORDS BY jomsr s. KOUNTZ, SECRETARY AND HISTORIAN OF THE COMMISSION. WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1901. PREFACE. The Vicksburg campaign opened March 29, 1863, with General Grant's order for the advance of General Osterhaus' division from Millikens Bend, and closed July 4^, 1863, with the surrender of Pem- berton's army and the city of Vicksburg. Its course was determined by General Grant's plan of campaign. This plan contemplated the march of his active army from Millikens Bend, La. , to a point on the river below Vicksburg, the running of the batteries at Vicksburg by a sufficient number of gunboats and transports, and the transfer of his army to the Mississippi side. These points were successfully accomplished and, May 1, the first battle of the campaign was fought near Port Gibson. Up to this time General Grant had contemplated the probability of uniting the army of General Banks with his. He then decided not to await the arrival of Banks, but to make the cam paign with his own army. May 12, at Raymond, Logan's division of Grant's army, with Crocker's division in reserve, was engaged with Gregg's brigade of Pemberton's army. Gregg was largely outnum bered and, after a stout fight, fell back to Jackson. The same day the left of Grant's army, under McClernand, skirmished at Fourteen- mile Creek with the cavalry and mounted infantry of Pemberton's army, supported by Bowen's division and two brigades of Loring's division.
  • Generalsecond Bullrun Campaign Under Pope That the Whole Corps Had to Be Detached from the Army of the Potomac for Rest and Recuperation

    Generalsecond Bullrun Campaign Under Pope That the Whole Corps Had to Be Detached from the Army of the Potomac for Rest and Recuperation

    PITTSBURGH VOLUNTEERS WITH SICKLES' EXCELSIOR BRIGADE Bruce Sutherland PART 3 Fredericksburg and Chancellorsville Heintzelman's Third Corps had been so badly mauled in the battles on the Peninsula under McClellan and in the GeneralSecond BullRun campaign under Pope that the whole Corps had to be detached from the Army of the Potomac for rest and recuperation. The three divisions of the Corps were assigned to that quiet sector known as the Defenses of Washington. General Hooker's old division, the Second, was placed temporarily under the command of General Grover while Colonel Nelson Taylor commanded the Excelsior Brigade, subject to General Sickles' return. Early in September 1862, the Excelsior regiments were en- camped about two miles southwest of Alexandria near Fort Lyon. They had fallen back from the Chantilly battlefield and as William Wiley of the Friend Rifles describes it, "We only went a short dis- tance beyond that field when we again laid on our arms, and it was raining and very cold. No sleeping was done that night. The next morning we got a loaf of bread and started off again towards Fairfax and then left itand went out scouting through the country until dark when we camped again on a beautiful farm and where we lived well for that night on corn, potatoes and apples. At daylight, the morning of the 3rd, we were on the move towards Alexandria ... J>1 The column moved through thickly wooded country toward the Potomac at Pohick Church and by early afternoon the troops were on the river road which skirted Mount Vernon.
  • [Pennsylvania County Histories]

    [Pennsylvania County Histories]

    J'-A ? "7 V~- / £ 3fOI( y. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2018 with funding from This project is made possible by a grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services as administered by the Pennsylvania Department of Education through the Office of Commonwealth Libraries https://archive.org/details/pennsylvaniacoun50unse t TWA. I ISPS 5GMP mOK. PATE NT S UNITED STATES. GREAT BRITAIN. FRANCE. June 24TH, 1873. May i6th, 1877. May i 8th, 1877. TRADE MARKS: UNITED STATES. GREAT BRITAIN. Registered No. 5,896. Registered No. 15,979. DIRECTIONS. Use but little moisture, and only on the gummed lines. Press the scrap on without wetting it. DANIEL SLOTE & COMPANY, NEW YORK. From OME HARD WORK WAS DONE -f-.*3L, By the Friends of the Proposed New County-They ^ ></ I » Kept up from 1820 Until Nearly 1850—There was Date, ^ Great Rejoicing in this City When the News Reached Here that the Legislature Had Fiven us 9^ history oFrwol'AMfSr' ' a Separate County. The history of Lawrence, as a sep¬ G^^er^of Eihvo’o/cny hTs^he Tt* arate and distinct county does not yet !s Sts: r thf"v"- extend to a period of 50 years. The the Henrys and he i,™ S 0f |story of the movement having’for its settled in the Allens who object the creation of a new coonty • iro- turt Lne cllstrlCt now connric- i tile COUntioe t '-'■tiipi is- lout of parts of Mercer and Beaver is a 'very interesting one. The project re¬ ceived considerable attention in the ber «?k#a^c«rw& early years of the century and from , 5\'hites, Waltons UfOm lners'1 Wilsons, 1820 on, was pushed with,,great vigor ,pvhose de3cenden't/now n Land Taylors.
  • Proposed Wisconsin – Lake Michigan National Marine Sanctuary

    Proposed Wisconsin – Lake Michigan National Marine Sanctuary

    Proposed Wisconsin – Lake Michigan National Marine Sanctuary Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Draft Management Plan DECEMBER 2016 | sanctuaries.noaa.gov/wisconsin/ National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) U.S. Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and NOAA Administrator Kathryn D. Sullivan, Ph.D. Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone Management National Ocean Service W. Russell Callender, Ph.D. Office of National Marine Sanctuaries John Armor, Director Matt Brookhart, Acting Deputy Director Cover Photos: Top: The schooner Walter B. Allen. Credit: Tamara Thomsen, Wisconsin Historical Society. Bottom: Photomosaic of the schooner Walter B. Allen. Credit: Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution - Advanced Imaging and Visualization Laboratory. 1 Abstract In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and the National Marine Sanctuaries Act (NMSA, 16 U.S.C. 1434 et seq.), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS) has prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) that considers alternatives for the proposed designation of Wisconsin - Lake Michigan as a National Marine Sanctuary. The proposed action addresses NOAA’s responsibilities under the NMSA to identify, designate, and protect areas of the marine and Great Lakes environment with special national significance due to their conservation, recreational, ecological, historical, scientific, cultural, archaeological, educational, or aesthetic qualities as national marine sanctuaries. ONMS has developed five alternatives for the designation, and the DEIS evaluates the environmental consequences of each under NEPA. The DEIS also serves as a resource assessment under the NMSA, documenting present and potential uses of the areas considered in the alternatives.
  • Shipwreck Surveys of the 2018 Field Season

    Shipwreck Surveys of the 2018 Field Season

    Storms and Strandings, Collisions and Cold: Shipwreck Surveys of the 2018 Field Season Included: Thomas Friant, Selah Chamberlain, Montgomery, Grace Patterson, Advance, I.A. Johnson State Archaeology and Maritime Preservation Technical Report Series #19-001 Tamara L. Thomsen, Caitlin N. Zant and Victoria L. Kiefer Assisted by grant funding from the University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute and Wisconsin Coastal Management Program, and a charitable donation from Elizabeth Uihlein of the Uline Corporation, this report was prepared by the Wisconsin Historical Society’s Maritime Preservation and Archaeology Program. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute, the National Sea Grant College Program, the Wisconsin Coastal Management Program, or the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Association. Note: At the time of publication, Thomas Friant and Montgomery sites are pending listing on the State and National Registers of Historic Places. Nomination packets for these shipwreck sites have been prepared and submitted to the Wisconsin State Historic Preservation Office. I.A. Johnson and Advance sites are listed on the State Register of Historic Places pending listing on the National Register of Historic Places, and Selah Chamberlain site is listed on the State and National Register of Historic Places. Grace Patterson site has been determined not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Cover photo: A diver surveying the scow schooner I.A. Johnson, Sheboygan County, Wisconsin. Copyright © 2019 by Wisconsin Historical Society All rights reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS ILLUSTRATIONS AND IMAGES ............................................................................................. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................
  • Maintaining Arctic Cooperation with Russia Planning for Regional Change in the Far North

    Maintaining Arctic Cooperation with Russia Planning for Regional Change in the Far North

    Maintaining Arctic Cooperation with Russia Planning for Regional Change in the Far North Stephanie Pezard, Abbie Tingstad, Kristin Van Abel, Scott Stephenson C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1731 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9745-3 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2017 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: NASA/Operation Ice Bridge. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface Despite a period of generally heightened tensions between Russia and the West, cooperation on Arctic affairs—particularly through the Arctic Council—has remained largely intact, with the exception of direct mil- itary-to-military cooperation in the region.
  • Bibliography of Maritime and Naval History

    Bibliography of Maritime and Naval History

    TAMU-L-76-ppz c. Bibliographyof Maritime and Naval History Periodical Articles Published 1974-1975 CkARLES R, SCHULTZ University Archives Texas A&M University PAMELA A. McNULTY G.W. Rlunt White Library TA M U-SG-77-601 Mystic Seaport September 1 976 Bibliography of Maritime and Naval History Periodical Articles Published 1974-1975 Compiled by Charles R. Schultz, University Archivist Texas A&M University Pamela A. McNulty, Reference Librarian G.W. Blunt White Library September 1976 TP2fU-SG-77-601 Partially supported through Institutional Grant 04-5-158-19 to Texas A&M University by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Office of Sea Grants Department of Commerce $<.oo Order from: Department of Marine Resources Information Center for Marine Resources Texas A&M University College Station, Texas 77843 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION I. GENERAL 1 II. EXPLORATION, NAVIGATION, CARTOGRAPHY 13 III. MERCHANT SAIL & GENERAL SHIPPING NORTH AMERICA 21 IV. MERCHANT SAIL & GENERAL SHIPPING - OTHER REGIONS ~ t ~ ~ o 28 V. MERCHANT STEAM - OCEAN & TIDKWATER 34 VI, INLAND NAVIGATION 56 VII, SEAPORTS & COASTAL AREAS 68 VIII. SHIPBUILDING & ALLIED TOPICS 74 IX. MARITIME LAW 82 X, SMALL CRAFT 88 XI. ASSOCIATIONS & UNIONS 93 XII. FISHERIES 94 XIII. NAVAL TO 1939 - NORTH AMERICA 102 XIV. NAVAL TO 1939 - OTHER REGIONS 110 XV. WORLD WAR II & POSTWAR NAVAL 119 XVI. MARINE ART, SHIP MODELS, COLLECTIONS & EXHIBITS 123 XVII. PLEASURE BOATING & YACHT RACING 126 AUTHOR INDEX 130 SUBJECT INDEX 143 VE S SKL INDEX 154 INTRODUCTION When the third volume in this series appeared two years ago, it appeared as though I would continue to produce a biennial bibliography based almost entirely upon the resources of Texas ARM University Libraries.
  • The University of Illinois and Arctic Studies Swedish Researcher Dr

    The University of Illinois and Arctic Studies Swedish Researcher Dr

    Augustana College Augustana Digital Commons Scandinavian Studies: Faculty Scholarship & Scandinavian Studies Creative Works 5-2017 The hC anging View of the Arctic: The niU versity of Illinois and Arctic Studies Mark Safstrom Augustana College, Rock Island Illinois Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.augustana.edu/scanfaculty Part of the Scandinavian Studies Commons Augustana Digital Commons Citation Safstrom, Mark. "The hC anging View of the Arctic: The nivU ersity of Illinois and Arctic Studies" (2017). Scandinavian Studies: Faculty Scholarship & Creative Works. http://digitalcommons.augustana.edu/scanfaculty/1 This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Scandinavian Studies at Augustana Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scandinavian Studies: Faculty Scholarship & Creative Works by an authorized administrator of Augustana Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Connecting the United States to the Arctic OUR ARCTIC NATION A U.S. Arctic Council Chairmanship Initiative Cover Photo: Cover Photo: Hosting Arctic Council meetings during the U.S. Chairmanship gave the United States an opportunity to share the beauty of America’s Arctic state, Alaska—including this glacier ice cave near Juneau—with thousands of international visitors. Photo: David Lienemann, www. davidlienemann.com OUR ARCTIC NATION Connecting the United States to the Arctic A U.S. Arctic Council Chairmanship Initiative TABLE OF CONTENTS 01 Alabama . .2 14 Illinois . 32 02 Alaska . .4 15 Indiana . 34 03 Arizona. 10 16 Iowa . 36 04 Arkansas . 12 17 Kansas . 38 05 California. 14 18 Kentucky . 40 06 Colorado . 16 19 Louisiana. 42 07 Connecticut. 18 20 Maine .
  • Voyages to Hawaii Before 1860

    Voyages to Hawaii Before 1860

    Voyages to Hawaii before 1860 Voyages to Hawaii before 1860 A Record, Based on Historical Narratives in the Libraries of the Hawaiian Mission Children’s Society and The Hawaiian Historical Society, Extended to March 1860 BERNICE JUDD enlarged and edited by HELEN YONGE LIND THE UNIVERSITY PRESS OF HAWAII for HAWAIIAN MISSION CHILDREN’S SOCIETY Honolulu Open Access edition funded by the National En- dowment for the Humanities / Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book Program. Licensed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 In- ternational (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits readers to freely download and share the work in print or electronic format for non-commercial purposes, so long as credit is given to the au- thor. Derivative works and commercial uses require permission from the publisher. For details, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. The Cre- ative Commons license described above does not apply to any material that is separately copyrighted. Open Access ISBNs: 9780824883928 (PDF) 9780824883935 (EPUB) This version created: 5 September, 2019 Please visit www.hawaiiopen.org for more Open Access works from University of Hawai‘i Press. This edition is a revision of that originally published in 1929 by the Hawaiian Mission Children’s Society. Copyright © 1974 by The University Press of Hawaii All rights reserved IN MEMORY OF BERNICE JUDD The earlier edition of this book, published in 1929, was written by Bernice Judd. She kept two interleaved copies in which she noted further entries during her thirty-three years’ work in the Hawaiian Mission Children’s Society library.
  • Arctic Species Trend Index: Migratory Birds Index

    Arctic Species Trend Index: Migratory Birds Index

    CAFF Assessment Series Report September 2015 Arctic Species Trend Index: Migratory Birds Index ARCTIC COUNCIL Acknowledgements CAFF Designated Agencies: • Norwegian Environment Agency, Trondheim, Norway • Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada • Faroese Museum of Natural History, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands (Kingdom of Denmark) • Finnish Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, Finland • Icelandic Institute of Natural History, Reykjavik, Iceland • Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Greenland • Russian Federation Ministry of Natural Resources, Moscow, Russia • Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden • United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska CAFF Permanent Participant Organizations: • Aleut International Association (AIA) • Arctic Athabaskan Council (AAC) • Gwich’in Council International (GCI) • Inuit Circumpolar Council (ICC) • Russian Indigenous Peoples of the North (RAIPON) • Saami Council This publication should be cited as: Deinet, S., Zöckler, C., Jacoby, D., Tresize, E., Marconi, V., McRae, L., Svobods, M., & Barry, T. (2015). The Arctic Species Trend Index: Migratory Birds Index. Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna, Akureyri, Iceland. ISBN: 978-9935-431-44-8 Cover photo: Arctic tern. Photo: Mark Medcalf/Shutterstock.com Back cover: Red knot. Photo: USFWS/Flickr Design and layout: Courtney Price For more information please contact: CAFF International Secretariat Borgir, Nordurslod 600 Akureyri, Iceland Phone: +354 462-3350 Fax: +354 462-3390 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.caff.is This report was commissioned and funded by the Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF), the Biodiversity Working Group of the Arctic Council. Additional funding was provided by WWF International, the Zoological Society of London (ZSL) and the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS). The views expressed in this report are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Arctic Council or its members.
  • “A” Is for Archaeology Underwater Archaeological Investigations from the 2016 and 2017 Field Seasons

    “A” Is for Archaeology Underwater Archaeological Investigations from the 2016 and 2017 Field Seasons

    “A” is for Archaeology Underwater Archaeological Investigations from the 2016 and 2017 Field Seasons State Archaeology and Maritime Preservation Technical Report Series #18-001 Tamara L. Thomsen, Caitlin N. Zant and Victoria L. Kiefer Assisted by grant funding from the University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute and Wisconsin Coastal Management Program this report was prepared by the Wisconsin Historical Society’s Maritime Preservation and Archaeology Program. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute, the National Sea Grant College Program, the Wisconsin Coastal Management Program, or the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Association. Note: At the time of publication the J.M. Allmendinger, and Antelope sites are pending listing on the State and National Registers of Historic Places. Nomination packets for these shipwreck sites have been prepared and submitted to the Wisconsin State Historic Preservation Office. The Arctic site is listed on the State Register of Historic Places pending listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The Atlanta site has been listed on the State and National Register of Historic Places. Cover photo: A diver surveying the boiler of the steambarge J.M. Allmendinger, Ozaukee County, Wisconsin. Copyright © 2018 by Wisconsin Historical Society All rights reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS ILLUSTRATIONS AND IMAGES ..........................................................................................................