DOCSLIB.ORG

Polar Regions (Arctic and Antarctic)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Polar Regions (Arctic and Antarctic) 16 Polar Regions (Arctic and Antarctic) OLEG ANISIMOV (RUSSIA) AND BLAIR FITZHARRIS (NEW ZEALAND) Lead Authors: J.O. Hagen (Norway), R. Jefferies (Canada), H. Marchant (Australia), F. Nelson (USA), T. Prowse (Canada), D.G. Vaughan (UK) Contributing Authors: I. Borzenkova (Russia), D. Forbes (Canada), K.M. Hinkel (USA), K. Kobak (Russia), H. Loeng (Norway), T. Root (USA), N. Shiklomanov (Russia), B. Sinclair (New Zealand), P. Skvarca (Argentina) Review Editors: Qin Dahe (China) and B. Maxwell (Canada) CONTENTS Executive Summary 80 3 16 . 2 . 6 . Arctic Hydrology 82 1 16 . 2 . 6 . 1 . Changes in Precipitation, Snow 16 . 1 . Po l a r Re g i o n s 80 7 Accumulation, and Spring Melt 82 3 16 . 1 . 1 . Previous Work—Summary of Special Report 16 . 2 . 6 . 2 . Surface Water Budgets on Regional Impacts of Climate Change 80 7 and Wet l a n d s 82 3 16 . 1 . 2 . Distinctive Characteristics of Polar Regions 80 9 16 . 2 . 6 . 3 . Ecological Impact of 16 . 1 . 3 . Climate Change in the 20th Century 81 0 Changing Runoff Regimes 82 3 16 . 1 . 3 . 1 . The Arctic 81 0 16 . 2 . 6 . 4 . Sensitivity of Arctic Ocean 16 . 1 . 3 . 2 . The An t a r c t i c 81 2 to River Flow 82 4 16 . 1 . 4 . Scenarios of Future Change 81 3 16 . 2 . 7 . Changes in Arctic Biota 82 4 16 . 2 . 7 . 1 . Impacts of Climate Change on 16 . 2 . Key Regional Concerns 81 4 Arctic Terrestrial Environments 82 4 16 . 2 . 1 . Changes in Ice Sheets and Glaciers 81 4 16 . 2 . 7 . 2 . Response of Ar c t i c 16 . 2 . 2 . Changes around the Antarctic Peninsula 81 5 Plant Communities 82 5 16 . 2 . 3 . Changes in the Southern Ocean 16 . 2 . 7 . 3 . Changes in Arctic An i m a l s 82 6 and Impacts on its Life 81 5 16 . 2 . 8 . Impact on Human Communities in the Ar c t i c 82 6 1 6 . 2 . 3 . 1 .O v e r v i e w 81 5 16 . 2 . 8 . 1 . Impacts on Indigenous Peoples 82 6 16 . 2 . 3 . 2 . Role of Ocean Changes 81 5 16 . 2 . 8 . 2 . Impacts on Economic Ac t i v i t y 82 7 16 . 2 . 3 . 3 . Role of Ice Shelves 81 6 16 . 2 . 3 . 4 . Impacts on Biology 16 . 3 . Sy n t h e s i s 82 9 of the Southern Ocean 81 7 16 . 3 . 1 . Feedbacks and Interactions—Polar Drivers 82 9 16 . 2 . 4 . Changes in Sea Ice 81 9 16 . 3 . 2 . Adaptation Potential and Vul n e r a b i l i t y 83 1 16 . 2 . 4 . 1 . Sea Ice in the Arctic Ocean 81 9 16 . 3 . 3 . Development, Sustainability, and Equity 83 1 16 . 2 . 4 . 2 . Sea Ice in the Southern Ocean 82 0 16 . 3 . 4 . Uncertainties and Risks 83 1 16 . 2 . 5 . Pe r m a f r o s t 82 0 16 . 2 . 5 . 1 . Temperature Ar c h i v e 82 0 Re f e re n c e s 83 2 16 . 2 . 5 . 2 . Predicted Changes in Permafrost 82 1 16 . 2 . 5 . 3 . Environmental Impacts 82 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In this summary we indicate our uncertainty in observations, Impacts mechanisms, and scenarios by using a five-point scale, from “very high confidence” (*****) to “very low confidence” (*). Substantial warming and increases in precipitation are projected for polar regions over the 21st century by almost all climate models. There are eight key concerns related to the impact of Climate Changes in the 20th Century this climate change in the Arctic and Antarctic. Associated with these concerns will be changes to the atmosphere and the Although there are some regional anomalies, there is strong oceans that will propagate to other regions of the world: evidence that climate change has had an impact in the Arctic and the Antarctic. Many documented changes already parallel 1) Changes in ice sheets and polar glaciers: Increased those forecast to result from climate change: melting is expected on Arctic glaciers and the Greenland ice sheet, and they will retreat and thin close • In the Arctic, extensive land areas show a 20th-century to their margins. Most of the Antarctic ice sheet is likely warming trend in air temperature of as much as 5°C. to thicken as a result of increased precipitation. There is Over sea ice, there has been slight warming in the a small risk, however, that the West Antarctic and 1961–1990 period.***** Precipitation has increased.** Greenland ice sheets will retreat in coming centuries. • Arctic sea-ice extent has decreased by 2.9% per decade To g e t h e r, these cryospheric changes may make a over the 1978–1996 period; sea ice has thinned, and s i gnificant contribution to sea-level rise.**** there are now more melt days per summer. Sea-ice 2) Changes around the Antarctic Peninsula: This region extent in the Nordic seas has decreased by 30% over has experienced spectacular retreat and collapse of ice the past 130 years.***** It is not yet clear whether shelves, which has been related to a southerly migration changes in sea ice of the past few decades are linked to of the January 0°C isotherm resulting from regional a natural cycle in climate variability or have resulted warming. The loss of these ice shelves has few direct explicitly from global warming. impacts. Projected warming is likely, however, to break • Atlantic water flowing into the Arctic Ocean has warmed, up ice shelves further south on the Antarctic Peninsula, and the surface layer has become thinner. The mixed expose more bare ground, and cause changes in layer in the Beaufort Sea has become less saline.**** t e r r e strial biology, such as introduction of exotic • Regions underlain by permafrost have been reduced in plants and animals.**** extent, and a general warming of ground temperatures 3) Changes in the Southern Ocean and impacts on its life: has been observed in many areas.***** Climate change is likely to produce long-term—perhaps • There has been a statistically significant decrease in irreversible—changes in the physical oceanography and spring snow extent over Eurasia since 1915.**** ecology of the Southern Ocean. Projected reductions in • In summary, many observations of environmental sea-ice extent will alter under-ice biota and spring bloom change in the Arctic show a trend that is consistent in the sea-ice marginal zone and will cause profound with warming and similar to that predicted by general impacts at all levels in the food chain, from algae to circulation models (GCMs). krill to the great whales. Marine mammals and birds, • In the Antarctic, over the past half-century there has which have life histories that tie them to specific breeding been a marked warming trend in the A n t a r c t i c sites, will be severely affected by shifts in their foraging Peninsula.**** Elsewhere there is a general but not habitats and migration of prey species. Warmer water unambiguous warming trend.** will potentially intensify biological activity and growth • Precipitation in the Antarctic has increased.* rates of fish. Ultimately, this should lead to an increase • Satellite observations show no significant change in in the catch of marketable fish, and retreat of sea ice Antarctic sea-ice extent over the 1973–1996 period.***** will provide easier access to southern fisheries.*** Analysis of whaling records and modeling studies 4) Changes in sea ice:There will be substantial loss of sea i n d icate that Antarctic sea ice retreated south by 2.8 ice in the Arctic Ocean. Predictions for summer ice degrees of latitude between the mid-1950s and the early indicate that its extent could shrink by 60% for a doubling 1970s.*** of carbon dioxide (CO2), opening new sea routes. This will • Surface waters of the Southern Ocean have warmed have major trading and strategic implications. With more and become less saline.*** open water, there will be a moderation of temperatures 804 Polar Regions (Arctic and Antarctic) and an increase in precipitation in Arctic lands. food species will affect hunting and gathering practices Antarctic sea-ice volume is predicted to decrease by and could threaten longstanding traditions and ways of 25% or more for a doubling of CO2, with sea ice life. On the other hand, communities that practice these retreating about 2 degrees of latitude.**** lifestyles may be sufficiently resilient to cope with 5) Changes in permafros t : Thickening of the seasonally these changes. Increased economic costs are expected thawed layer above permafrost (active layer) is expected. to affect infrastructure, in response to thawing of Modeling studies indicate that large areas of permafrost p e rmafrost and reduced transportation capabilities terrain will begin to thaw, leading to changes in across frozen ground and water. However, there will be drainage, increased mass movements, thermal erosion, and economic benefits—including new opportunities for altered landscapes in much of the Arctic and subarctic. trade and shipping across the Arctic Ocean, lower Warming of permafrost, thawing of ground ice, and o p e rational costs for the oil and gas industry, lower development of thermokarst terrain have been documented heating costs, and easier access for ship-based over the past several decades. In developed areas of the tourism.***** Arctic, continuation of such changes may lead to costly damage to human infrastructure.**** 6) Changes in Ar ctic hydrol o g y : The hydrology of the Feedbacks and Interactions Arctic is particularly susceptible to warming because small rises in temperature will result in increased melting Climate change and global warming will affect key polar drivers of snow and ice, with consequent impacts on the water of further climate change.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Our Arctic Nation a U.S
    Connecting the United States to the Arctic OUR ARCTIC NATION A U.S. Arctic Council Chairmanship Initiative Cover Photo: Cover Photo: Hosting Arctic Council meetings during the U.S. Chairmanship gave the United States an opportunity to share the beauty of America’s Arctic state, Alaska—including this glacier ice cave near Juneau—with thousands of international visitors. Photo: David Lienemann, www. davidlienemann.com OUR ARCTIC NATION Connecting the United States to the Arctic A U.S. Arctic Council Chairmanship Initiative TABLE OF CONTENTS 01 Alabama . .2 14 Illinois . 32 02 Alaska . .4 15 Indiana . 34 03 Arizona. 10 16 Iowa . 36 04 Arkansas . 12 17 Kansas . 38 05 California. 14 18 Kentucky . 40 06 Colorado . 16 19 Louisiana. 42 07 Connecticut. 18 20 Maine . 44 08 Delaware . 20 21 Maryland. 46 09 District of Columbia . 22 22 Massachusetts . 48 10 Florida . 24 23 Michigan . 50 11 Georgia. 26 24 Minnesota . 52 12 Hawai‘i. 28 25 Mississippi . 54 Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska. Photo: iStock.com 13 Idaho . 30 26 Missouri . 56 27 Montana . 58 40 Rhode Island . 84 28 Nebraska . 60 41 South Carolina . 86 29 Nevada. 62 42 South Dakota . 88 30 New Hampshire . 64 43 Tennessee . 90 31 New Jersey . 66 44 Texas. 92 32 New Mexico . 68 45 Utah . 94 33 New York . 70 46 Vermont . 96 34 North Carolina . 72 47 Virginia . 98 35 North Dakota . 74 48 Washington. .100 36 Ohio . 76 49 West Virginia . .102 37 Oklahoma . 78 50 Wisconsin . .104 38 Oregon. 80 51 Wyoming. .106 39 Pennsylvania . 82 WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE AN ARCTIC NATION? oday, the Arctic region commands the world’s attention as never before.
    [Show full text]
  • The Antarctic Treaty System And
    The Antarctic Treaty System and Law During the first half of the 20th century a series of territorial claims were made to parts of Antarctica, including New Zealand's claim to the Ross Dependency in 1923. These claims created significant international political tension over Antarctica which was compounded by military activities in the region by several nations during the Second World War. These tensions were eased by the International Geophysical Year (IGY) of 1957-58, the first substantial multi-national programme of scientific research in Antarctica. The IGY was pivotal not only in recognising the scientific value of Antarctica, but also in promoting co- operation among nations active in the region. The outstanding success of the IGY led to a series of negotiations to find a solution to the political disputes surrounding the continent. The outcome to these negotiations was the Antarctic Treaty. The Antarctic Treaty The Antarctic Treaty was signed in Washington on 1 December 1959 by the twelve nations that had been active during the IGY (Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Chile, France, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, South Africa, United Kingdom, United States and USSR). It entered into force on 23 June 1961. The Treaty, which applies to all land and ice-shelves south of 60° South latitude, is remarkably short for an international agreement – just 14 articles long. The twelve nations that adopted the Treaty in 1959 recognised that "it is in the interests of all mankind that Antarctica shall continue forever to be used exclusively for peaceful purposes and shall not become the scene or object of international discord".
    [Show full text]
  • Benthic Community Response to Iceberg Scouring at an Intensely Disturbed Shallow Water Site at Adelaide Island, Antarctica
    Vol. 355: 85–94, 2008 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published February 26 doi: 10.3354/meps07311 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Benthic community response to iceberg scouring at an intensely disturbed shallow water site at Adelaide Island, Antarctica Dan A. Smale*, David K. A. Barnes, Keiron P. P. Fraser, Lloyd S. Peck British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OET, UK ABSTRACT: Disturbance is a key structuring force influencing shallow water communities at all latitudes. Polar nearshore communities are intensely disturbed by ice, yet little is known about benthic recovery following iceberg groundings. Understanding patterns of recovery following ice scour may be particularly important in the West Antarctic Peninsula region, one of the most rapidly changing marine systems on Earth. Here we present the first observations from within the Antarc- tic Circle of community recovery following iceberg scouring. Three grounded icebergs were marked at a highly disturbed site at Adelaide Island (~67° S) and the resultant scours were sampled at <1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 30 to 32 mo following formation. Each iceberg impact was catastrophic in that it resulted in a 92 to 96% decrease in abundance compared with reference zones, but all post- scoured communities increased in similarity towards ‘undisturbed’ assemblages over time. Taxa recovered at differing rates, probably due to varying mechanisms of return to scoured areas. By the end of the study, we found no differences in abundance between scoured and reference samples for 6 out of 9 major taxonomic groups. Five pioneer species had consistently elevated abundances in scours compared with reference zones.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Disc Resources
    An early map of the world Resource D1 A map of the world drawn in 1570 shows ‘Terra Australis Nondum Cognita’ (the unknown south land). National Library of Australia Expeditions to Antarctica 1770 –1830 and 1910 –1913 Resource D2 Voyages to Antarctica 1770–1830 1772–75 1819–20 1820–21 Cook (Britain) Bransfield (Britain) Palmer (United States) ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ Resolution and Adventure Williams Hero 1819 1819–21 1820–21 Smith (Britain) ▼ Bellingshausen (Russia) Davis (United States) ▼ ▼ ▼ Williams Vostok and Mirnyi Cecilia 1822–24 Weddell (Britain) ▼ Jane and Beaufoy 1830–32 Biscoe (Britain) ★ ▼ Tula and Lively South Pole expeditions 1910–13 1910–12 1910–13 Amundsen (Norway) Scott (Britain) sledge ▼ ▼ ship ▼ Source: Both maps American Geographical Society Source: Major voyages to Antarctica during the 19th century Resource D3 Voyage leader Date Nationality Ships Most southerly Achievements latitude reached Bellingshausen 1819–21 Russian Vostok and Mirnyi 69˚53’S Circumnavigated Antarctica. Discovered Peter Iøy and Alexander Island. Charted the coast round South Georgia, the South Shetland Islands and the South Sandwich Islands. Made the earliest sighting of the Antarctic continent. Dumont d’Urville 1837–40 French Astrolabe and Zeelée 66°S Discovered Terre Adélie in 1840. The expedition made extensive natural history collections. Wilkes 1838–42 United States Vincennes and Followed the edge of the East Antarctic pack ice for 2400 km, 6 other vessels confirming the existence of the Antarctic continent. Ross 1839–43 British Erebus and Terror 78°17’S Discovered the Transantarctic Mountains, Ross Ice Shelf, Ross Island and the volcanoes Erebus and Terror. The expedition made comprehensive magnetic measurements and natural history collections.
    [Show full text]
  • River Ice Management in North America
    RIVER ICE MANAGEMENT IN NORTH AMERICA REPORT 2015:202 HYDRO POWER River ice management in North America MARCEL PAUL RAYMOND ENERGIE SYLVAIN ROBERT ISBN 978-91-7673-202-1 | © 2015 ENERGIFORSK Energiforsk AB | Phone: 08-677 25 30 | E-mail: [email protected] | www.energiforsk.se RIVER ICE MANAGEMENT IN NORTH AMERICA Foreword This report describes the most used ice control practices applied to hydroelectric generation in North America, with a special emphasis on practical considerations. The subjects covered include the control of ice cover formation and decay, ice jamming, frazil ice at the water intakes, and their impact on the optimization of power generation and on the riparians. This report was prepared by Marcel Paul Raymond Energie for the benefit of HUVA - Energiforsk’s working group for hydrological development. HUVA incorporates R&D- projects, surveys, education, seminars and standardization. The following are delegates in the HUVA-group: Peter Calla, Vattenregleringsföretagen (ordf.) Björn Norell, Vattenregleringsföretagen Stefan Busse, E.ON Vattenkraft Johan E. Andersson, Fortum Emma Wikner, Statkraft Knut Sand, Statkraft Susanne Nyström, Vattenfall Mikael Sundby, Vattenfall Lars Pettersson, Skellefteälvens vattenregleringsföretag Cristian Andersson, Energiforsk E.ON Vattenkraft Sverige AB, Fortum Generation AB, Holmen Energi AB, Jämtkraft AB, Karlstads Energi AB, Skellefteå Kraft AB, Sollefteåforsens AB, Statkraft Sverige AB, Umeå Energi AB and Vattenfall Vattenkraft AB partivipates in HUVA. Stockholm, November 2015 Cristian
    [Show full text]
  • Asynchronous Antarctic and Greenland Ice-Volume Contributions to the Last Interglacial Sea-Level Highstand
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12874-3 OPEN Asynchronous Antarctic and Greenland ice-volume contributions to the last interglacial sea-level highstand Eelco J. Rohling 1,2,7*, Fiona D. Hibbert 1,7*, Katharine M. Grant1, Eirik V. Galaasen 3, Nil Irvalı 3, Helga F. Kleiven 3, Gianluca Marino1,4, Ulysses Ninnemann3, Andrew P. Roberts1, Yair Rosenthal5, Hartmut Schulz6, Felicity H. Williams 1 & Jimin Yu 1 1234567890():,; The last interglacial (LIG; ~130 to ~118 thousand years ago, ka) was the last time global sea level rose well above the present level. Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) contributions were insufficient to explain the highstand, so that substantial Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) reduction is implied. However, the nature and drivers of GrIS and AIS reductions remain enigmatic, even though they may be critical for understanding future sea-level rise. Here we complement existing records with new data, and reveal that the LIG contained an AIS-derived highstand from ~129.5 to ~125 ka, a lowstand centred on 125–124 ka, and joint AIS + GrIS contributions from ~123.5 to ~118 ka. Moreover, a dual substructure within the first highstand suggests temporal variability in the AIS contributions. Implied rates of sea-level rise are high (up to several meters per century; m c−1), and lend credibility to high rates inferred by ice modelling under certain ice-shelf instability parameterisations. 1 Research School of Earth Sciences, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. 2 Ocean and Earth Science, University of Southampton, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK. 3 Department of Earth Science and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, University of Bergen, Allegaten 41, 5007 Bergen, Norway.
    [Show full text]
  • Polartrec Teacher Joins Hunt for Old Ice in Antarctica
    NEWSLETTER OF THE NATIONAL ICE CORE LABORATORY — SCIENCE MANAGEMENT OFFICE Vol. 5 Issue 1 • SPRING 2010 PolarTREC Teacher Joins Hunt for Old Eric Cravens: Ice in Antarctica Farewell & By Jacquelyn (Jackie) Hams, PolarTREC Teacher Thanks! Courtesy: PolarTREC ... page 2 WAIS Divide Ice Core Images Now Available from AGDC ... page 3 WAIS Divide Ice Dave Marchant and Jackie Hams Core Update Photo: PolarTREC ... page 3 WHEN I APPLIED to the PolarTREC I actually left for Antarctica. I was originally program (http://www.polartrec.com/), I was selected by the CReSIS (Center for Remote asked where I would prefer to go given the Sensing of Ice Sheets) project, which has options of the Arctic, Antarctica, or either. I headquarters at the University of Kansas. I checked the Antarctica box only, despite the met and spent a few days visiting the team at Drilling for Old Ice fact that I may have decreased my chances of the University of Kansas and had dinner at the being selected. Antarctica was my preference Principal Investigator’s home with other team ... page 5 for many reasons. As a teacher I felt that members. We were all pleased with the match Antarctica represented the last frontier to study and looked forward to working together. the geologic history of the planet because the continent is uninhabited, not polluted, and In the late summer of 2008, I was informed that NEEM Reaches restricted to pure research. Over the last few the project was cancelled and that I would be Eemian and years I have noticed that my students were assigned to another research team.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Do We Use Latitude and Longitude? What Is the Equator?
    Where in the World? This lesson teaches the concepts of latitude and longitude with relation to the globe. Grades: 4, 5, 6 Disciplines: Geography, Math Before starting the activity, make sure each student has access to a globe or a world map that contains latitude and longitude lines. Why Do We Use Latitude and Longitude? The Earth is divided into degrees of longitude and latitude which helps us measure location and time using a single standard. When used together, longitude and latitude define a specific location through geographical coordinates. These coordinates are what the Global Position System or GPS uses to provide an accurate locational relay. Longitude and latitude lines measure the distance from the Earth's Equator or central axis - running east to west - and the Prime Meridian in Greenwich, England - running north to south. What Is the Equator? The Equator is an imaginary line that runs around the center of the Earth from east to west. It is perpindicular to the Prime Meridan, the 0 degree line running from north to south that passes through Greenwich, England. There are equal distances from the Equator to the north pole, and also from the Equator to the south pole. The line uniformly divides the northern and southern hemispheres of the planet. Because of how the sun is situated above the Equator - it is primarily overhead - locations close to the Equator generally have high temperatures year round. In addition, they experience close to 12 hours of sunlight a day. Then, during the Autumn and Spring Equinoxes the sun is exactly overhead which results in 12-hour days and 12-hour nights.
    [Show full text]
  • GSA TODAY • Southeastern Section Meeting, P
    Vol. 5, No. 1 January 1995 INSIDE • 1995 GeoVentures, p. 4 • Environmental Education, p. 9 GSA TODAY • Southeastern Section Meeting, p. 15 A Publication of the Geological Society of America • North-Central–South-Central Section Meeting, p. 18 Stability or Instability of Antarctic Ice Sheets During Warm Climates of the Pliocene? James P. Kennett Marine Science Institute and Department of Geological Sciences, University of California Santa Barbara, CA 93106 David A. Hodell Department of Geology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 ABSTRACT to the south from warmer, less nutrient- rich Subantarctic surface water. Up- During the Pliocene between welling of deep water in the circum- ~5 and 3 Ma, polar ice sheets were Antarctic links the mean chemical restricted to Antarctica, and climate composition of ocean deep water with was at times significantly warmer the atmosphere through gas exchange than now. Debate on whether the (Toggweiler and Sarmiento, 1985). Antarctic ice sheets and climate sys- The evolution of the Antarctic cryo- tem withstood this warmth with sphere-ocean system has profoundly relatively little change (stability influenced global climate, sea-level his- hypothesis) or whether much of the tory, Earth’s heat budget, atmospheric ice sheet disappeared (deglaciation composition and circulation, thermo- hypothesis) is ongoing. Paleoclimatic haline circulation, and the develop- data from high-latitude deep-sea sed- ment of Antarctic biota. iments strongly support the stability Given current concern about possi- hypothesis. Oxygen isotopic data ble global greenhouse warming, under- indicate that average sea-surface standing the history of the Antarctic temperatures in the Southern Ocean ocean-cryosphere system is important could not have increased by more for assessing future response of the Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctic Climate and Sea Ice Variability – a Brief Review Marilyn Raphael UCLA Geography
    Antarctic Climate and Sea Ice Variability – a Brief Review Marilyn Raphael UCLA Geography WRCP Workshop on Seasonal to Multi- Decadal Predictability of Polar Climate Mean annual precipitation produced by NCEP2 for the years 1979–99 (mm yr21water equivalent). Bromwich et al, 2004 A significant upward trend 11.3 to 11.7 mm yr22 for 1979–99 is found from retrieved and forecast Antarctic precipitation over the continent. (a) Monthly and (b) annual time series for the modeled precipitation over all of Antarctica. Bromwich et al, 2004 Spatial pattern of temperature trends (degrees Celsius per decade) from reconstruction using infrared (TIR) satellite data. a, Mean annual trends for 1957–2006; b, Mean annual trends for 1969–2000, c–f, Seasonal trends for 1957–2006: winter (June, July, August; c); spring (September, October, November; d); summer (December, January, February; e); autumn (March, April, May; f). Over the long term (150 years) Antarctica has been warming, recent cooling trends in the 1990s attributed to positive trend in the SAM offset this warming. (Schneider et al, 2006) – ice cores Warming of Antarctica extends beyond the Antarctic Peninsula includes most of west Antarctica. Except in autumn, warming is apparent across most of the continent but is significant only over west Antarctica including the Peninsula (Steig et al, 2009). 1957 – 2006 reconstruction from satellite data. Steig et al, 2009 Steig et al, 2009 – reconstruction based on satellite and station data annual warming of 0.18C per decade for 1957 – 2006; winter and spring leading. Chapman and Walsh, 2007 – reconstruction based on station data and oceanic records 1950-2002: warming across most of West Antarctica Monaghan et al, 2009 – reconstruction 190-2005: warming across West Antarctica in all seasons; significant in spring and summer Trends are strongly seasonal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mesa Site: Paleoindians Above the Arctic Circle
    U. S. Department of the Interior BLM-Alaska Open File Report 86 Bureau of Land Management BLM/AK/ST-03/001+8100+020 April 2003 Alaska State Office 222 West 7th Avenue Anchorage Alaska 99513 The Mesa Site: Paleoindians above the Arctic Circle Michael Kunz, Michael Bever, Constance Adkins Cover Photo View of Mesa from west with Iteriak Creek in foreground. Photo: Dan Gullickson Disclaimer The mention of trade names or commercial products in this report does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the federal government. Authors Michael Kunz is an Archaeologist, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Northern Field Office, 1150 University Avenue, Fairbanks, Alaska 99709. Michael Bever is a project supervisor for Pacific Legacy Inc., 3081 Alhambra Drive, Suite 208, Cameron Park, CA 95682. Constance Adkins is an Archaeologist, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Northern Field Office, 1150 University Avenue, Fairbanks, Alaska 99709. Open File Reports Open File Reports issued by the Bureau of Land Management-Alaska present the results of invento- ries or other investigations on a variety of scientific and technical subjects that are made available to the public outside the formal BLM-Alaska technical publication series. These reports can include preliminary or incomplete data and are not published and distributed in quantity. The reports are available while supplies last from BLM External Affairs, 222 West 7th Avenue #13, Anchorage, Alaska 99513 and from the Juneau Minerals Information Center, 100 Savikko Road, Mayflower Island, Douglas, AK 99824, (907) 364-1553. Copies are also available for inspection at the Alaska Resource Library and Information Service (Anchorage), the USDI Resources Library in Washington, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Conference of the History EG and Humanities and Social Sciences
    Joint conference of the History EG and Humanities and Social Sciences EG "Antarctic Wilderness: Perspectives from History, the Humanities and the Social Sciences" Colorado State University, Fort Collins (USA), 20 - 23 May 2015 A joint conference of the History Expert Group and the Humanities and Social Sciences Expert Group on "Antarctic Wilderness: Perspectives from History, the Humanities and the Social Sciences" was held at Colorado State University in Fort Collins (USA) on 20-23 May 2015. On Wednesday (20 May) we started with an excursion to the Rocky Mountain National Park close to Estes. A hike of two hours took us along a former golf course that had been remodelled as a natural plain, and served as a fitting site for a discussion with park staff on “comparative wilderness” given the different connotations of that term in isolated Antarctica and comparatively accessible Colorado. After our return to Fort Collins we met a group of members of APECS (Association of Polar Early Career Scientists), with whom we had a tour through the New Belgium Brewery. The evening concluded with a screening of the film “Nightfall on Gaia” by the anthropologist Juan Francisco Salazar (Australia), which provides an insight into current social interactions on King George Island and connections to the natural and political complexities of the sixth continent. The conference itself was opened by on Thursday (21 May) by Diana Wall, head of the School of Global Environmental Sustainability at the Colorado State University (CSU). Andres Zarankin (Brazil) opened the first session on narratives and counter narratives from Antarctica with his talk on sealers, marginality, and official narratives in Antarctic history.
    [Show full text]