DOCSLIB.ORG

Parliamentary Debates

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parliamentary Debates Volume II t Tuesday No. 1 25th May, 1965 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DEWAN NEGARA (SENATE) OFFICIAL REPORT SECOND SESSION OF THE SECOND DEWAN NEGARA CONTENTS PRESENTATION OF THE PRESIDENT'S CHAIR [Col. 3] MOTION OF THANKS TO THE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA [Col. 8] DI-CHETAK DI-JABATAN CHETAK KERAJAAN OLEH THOR BEND CHONG, A.M.N., PENCHETAK KERAJAAN KUALA LUMPUR 1967 MALAYSIA DEWAN NEGARA (SENATE) Official Report Vol. II Second Session of the Second Dewan Negara No. 1 Tuesday, 25th May, 1965 The Senate met at Three o'clock p.m.. PRESENT : The Honourable Mr President, DATO' HAJI ABDUL RAHMAN BIN MOHAMED YASIN, S.P.M.J., P..I.S., J.P. (Johore). ENCHE' A. ARUNASALAM, A.M.N. (Appointed). ENCHE' ABDUL RAHMAN BIN AHMAD (Perlis). ENCHE' ABDUL SAMAD BIN OSMAN (Appointed). ENCHE' ABDUL WAHAB BIN IDUS, P.J.K. (Negri Sembilan). „ TUAN HAJI AHMAD BIN HAJI ABDULLAH, A.M.N. (Penang). „ ENCHE' AHMAD BIN HAJI TAFF (Singapore). „ CHE' AISHAH BINTI HAJI ABDUL GHANI (Appointed). CHE' BIBI AISHA BINTI HAMID DON, A.M.N. (Appointed). ENCHE' AMALUDDIN BIN DARUS (Kelantan). ENCHE' AWANG DAUD MATUSIN (Appointed). ENCHE' CHAN KWONG-HON, A.M.N., S.M.S., J.P. (Selangor). DATO' DR CHEAH TOON LOK, D.P.M.K., D. M.K., J.M.N., J.P. (Appointed). ENCHE' CHoo KOK LEONG (Appointed). DATO' J. E. S. CRAWFORD, J.M.N., J.P., Dato' Kurnia Indera (Appointed). ENCHE' D. S. DORAI RAJ (Appointed). DATO' FOO SEE MOI, D.P.M.K., J.P. (Appointed). ENCHE' HOH GHEE CHEONG, A.M.N., J.P. (Pahang). ENCHE' HONG TECK GUAN (Appointed). ENCHE' ANDREW JIKA LANDAU (Appointed). ENCHE' KHOO TECK PUAT (Appointed). ENCHE' KO TECK KIN (Singapore). „ ENCHE' KOH KIM LENG (Malacca). DATO' LEE FOONG YEE, J.M.N., P.P.T., J.P. (Negri Sembilan). DATO' Y. T. LEE, D.P.M.S., J.M.N., P.J.K., J.P. (Appointed). ENCHE' MOHAMAD ADIB BIN OMAR (Trengganu). DATU PENGIRAN MOHAMED DIGADONG GALPAM, P.D.K. (Sabah). „ DATO' HAJI MOHAMED NOAH BIN OMAR, P.M.N., S.P.M.J., D .P.M.B., P.I.S., J.P. (Appointed). „ TUAN HAJI MOHAMED SAID BIN HAJI ABU BAKAR (Appointed). 3 25 MAY 1965 4 The Honourable ENCHE' MOHAMED SALLEH BIN MOHAMED ARIFF (Malacca). „ ENCHE' ATHI NAHAPPAN (Appointed). ENCHE' S. P. S. NATHAN (Appointed). TEMENGGONG OYONG LAWAI JAU (Sarawak). TOK PANGKU PANDAK HAMID BIN PUTEH JALI , P.J.K. (Appointed). ENCHE' SAIDON BIN KECHUT, A.M.N. (Appointed). DATO' SHEIKH ABU BAKAR BIN YAHYA , D.P.M.J., P.I.S., J.P. (Johore). DATO' G. SHELLEY , P.M.N., J.P. (Appointed). TUAN SYED AHMAD BIN SYED MAHMUD SHAHABUDIN , J.M.N. (Kedah). ENCHE' WILLIAM TAN (Appointed). DATO' T. H. TAN, P.M.N. (Appointed). DATO' TEH SIEW ENG, D.P.M.P ., J.M.N., P.J.K., J.P . (Appointed). S, ENCHE' S. O. K. UBAIDULLA , J.M.N. (Appointed). WAN AHMAD BIN WAN DAUD, J.M.N., P.J.K., J.P. (Perlis). DATO' WAN IBRAHIM BIN WAN TANJONG, J.M.N., P.J.K., Orang Kaya Indera Maharaja Purba Jelai (Pahang). WAN SULAIMAN BIN WAN TAM, P .J.K. (Kedah). ENCHE' YAHYA BIN HAJI AHMAD (Perak). ABSENT : The Honourable the Minister without Portfolio, DATO' ONG YOKE LIN, P.M.N. (Appointed). DATU JOSEPH AUGUSTINE ANGIAN ANDULAG, P.D.K. (Sabah). „ DATU TUANKU BUJANG BIN TUANKU HAJI OTHMAN (Sarawak). ENCHE' CHEAH SENG KHIM, J.P. (Penang). ENCHE' DA ABDUL JALIL BIN HAJI AWANG (Trengganu). ENCHE' GAN TECK YEOw, J.M.N. (Appointed). ENCHE' C. D. ISMAIL, J.M.N., J.P. (Appointed). ENCHE' LIM HEE HONG, A.M.N . (Appointed). NIK HASSAN BIN HAJI NIK YAHYA, J.M.N. (Appointed). S 9 RAJA RASTAM SHAHROME BIN RAJA SAID TAUF HY (Selangor). t, DATO' E. E. C. THURAISINGHAM, D.P.M.J., J.P. (Appointed). ENCHE' YEOH KIAN TEIK (Perak). PRAYERS Mr President: Honourable Senators, is it the pleasure of the Senate that the (Mr President in the Chair) Delegation be admitted? (Senators indicate assent). Will the Clerk please PRESENTATION OF THE conduct the Delegation to the bar. PRESIDENT'S CHAIR (The Clerk conducts the Delegation The Clerk: Mr President, I have to to the bar). report that a Delegation, sent by the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Mr President: Members of the Australia to present a President's Chair Delegation, pray be seated. to the Senate of Malaysia, is inquiring if this Honourable Senate will be Honourable Senators , we are all pleased to receive them. aware that under normal situation we 5 25 MAY 1965 6 should carry out the proceedings of this than kept" and it is in this spirit that Senate in the National Language, but we welcome you here. having regard to the circumstances of I now invite Senator the Honourable this Special Meeting I am sure Honour- Sir Alister McMullin, President of the able Senators will agree with me that Senate, Commonwealth of Australia, to it will not be inappropriate to proceed speak. along today in English and con- sequently I shall speak in this language Sir Alister McMullin (President of and hope that Honourable Senators the Senate, Commonwealth of Austra- will bear with me. lia): Mr President, you will forgive me, I hope, if I commence on an historical On behalf of this Honourable House, I would like to welcome you Sir note, but the events to which I refer Alister McMullin, President of the were of great importance and were pre- cedent to these proceedings today. Senate, Commonwealth of Australia, and Mr A. R. Cumming Thom, Acting On 31st August, 1962, the fifth Principal Parliamentary Officer of the anniversary of Malaya's independence, Senate, Commonwealth of Australia, to His Majesty laid the foundation stone this Chamber today. We are indeed of this magnificent Parliament Building. delighted to have you here with us. It is a great tribute to the planners, designers and builders that only four- We were very happy indeed when teen months elapsed between then and we first heard that the Australian the event on 2nd November of the Parliament has decided to present this following year, when His Majesty Senate with a President's Chair. We opened the new Parliament House, and, were further flattered to hear that the in so doing, gave symbolic effect to Australian Parliament would be sending the constitutional and political develop- a special Delegation to this Senate to ments which had culminated in the make the presentation. We are now inauguration of Malaysia during the doubly honoured to find the Delegation previous month. being led by no less a person than the Honourable President of the Senate Two days after that event, His himself. It is not often that this Senate Majesty was graciously pleased to open, has been privileged to have in its in this Parliament House, the Ninth presence such a distinguished visitor. Conference of the Commonwealth Sir Alister, you have indeed done us a Parliamentary Association, at which great honour in taking all the trouble were represented the Parliaments of to come over here from Australia. It is the Commonwealth of Nations. This in appreciation of your Parliament's ceremony was, I believe, of great generous gesture that Members of this significance, as it emphasised the words Senate are gathered here today at a of His Majesty two days previously special sitting. that "This noble edifice is visible proof to all the world of the faith of Malayan Australia, which shares the same people in the concept of Parliamentary democratic ideals that we all here democracy." treasure, has been all along more than generous in providing assistance to our I was privileged to be present on young nation in various fields. I need both occasions, a privilege which was not elaborate on this as all Honour- heightened, Mr President, when at an able Senators are fully aware of this informal ceremony in your suite, I fact. Such generosity can only stem out asked if your Senate would accept from of the strong bond of friendship that the Australian Parliament a President's exists between the people of Australia Chair which would do justice to and and the people of Malaysia -a friend- harmonise with this splendid Senate ship which we firmly believe will be Chamber. You, Sir, were kind enough maintained ever after. This long to say that the gift would be welcome standing friendship also gives us a indeed. sense of achievement, for as they say It may seem that we have been over "Friendship is like money, easier made long in fulfilling our promise. I can 7 25 MAY 1965 8 only plead our sincere desire that there Mr President, this occasion is one should be every care in design, material which I shall never forget . I consider and workmanship so that the final it an honour to be your guest in this product should be worthy of and Chamber, an honour which is all the consistent with the architecture and greater because, through you and your furnishing of this Senate, and be accept- colleagues of the Senate, Sir, I am able able to its Members. I hope that this to give visible expression to the friend- Chair, a symbol of authority and ship which exists -between our two dignity, which was designed and con- countries by presenting this Chair to structed by the Australian Department you for your use and that of your of Works, out of Australian timber and successors. materials, has achieved our purpose. I can assure you that its construction It is our earnest hope that it will be was the subject of lively and personal tangible evidence of our great goodwill interest by those officers of the Depart- towards you and of our support for ment who were concerned.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Politician Overboard: Jumping the Party Ship
    INFORMATION, ANALYSIS AND ADVICE FOR THE PARLIAMENT INFORMATION AND RESEARCH SERVICES Research Paper No. 4 2002–03 Politician Overboard: Jumping the Party Ship DEPARTMENT OF THE PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY ISSN 1328-7478 Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 2003 Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of the Department of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official duties. This paper has been prepared for general distribution to Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the paper is written using information publicly available at the time of production. The views expressed are those of the author and should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services (IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official parliamentary or Australian government document. IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with members of the public. Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Library, 2003 I NFORMATION AND R ESEARCH S ERVICES Research Paper No. 4 2002–03 Politician Overboard: Jumping the Party Ship Sarah Miskin Politics and Public Administration Group 24 March 2003 Acknowledgments I would like to thank Martin Lumb and Janet Wilson for their help with the research into party defections in Australia and Cathy Madden, Scott Bennett, David Farrell and Ben Miskin for reading and commenting on early drafts.
    [Show full text]
  • Hansard Report Is for Information Purposes Only
    June 23, 2020 NATIONAL ASSEMBLY DEBATES 1 PARLIAMENT OF KENYA THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY THE HANSARD Tuesday, 23rd June, 2020 The House met at 10.00 a.m. [The Deputy Speaker (Hon. Moses Cheboi) in the Chair] PRAYERS Hon. Deputy Speaker: Hon. Members, you know it is not very easy now to confirm the quorum. That is because we also have to know the number of Members who are in other holding areas. So, we will allow a few more members to come in and then we can make the final confirmation. Order Members, it is now confirmed that we have the required quorum and, therefore, business will begin. COMMUNICATION FROM THE CHAIR CHANGES IN THE MAJORITY PARTY LEADERSHIP Hon. Members, Standing Order 19(1) provides leeway for the largest party or coalition of parties in the National Assembly to elect a Member of the party or coalition of parties to serve as the Leader of the Majority Party. Further, Standing Order 19(3) outlines the procedure for removal of a Leader of the Majority Party. In this regard, Hon. Members, and pursuant to the provision of Standing Order 19(4), I wish to inform the House that I have received a letter from the Majority Party Chief Whip communicating that the Jubilee Coalition held a Parliamentary Group meeting on June 22nd, 2020 at the Kenyatta International Convention Centre (KICC). The letter also conveys that, the Meeting, which comprised of Members of the Coalition in the National Assembly and chaired by the Party Leader, His Excellency the President of the Republic of Kenya and Commander-in-Chief of the Kenya Defence Forces – (i) removed Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BARISAN NASIONAL II Chedet.Co.Cc September 22, 2008 by Dr
    THE BARISAN NASIONAL II Chedet.co.cc September 22, 2008 by Dr. Mahathir Mohamad 1. When the Barisan Nasional did very badly in the March 2008 general elections, all the component parties except those in Sabah and Sarawak experienced losses as they had never done before. 2. In the aftermath of the elections, the component parties pointed accusing fingers at each other. Very quickly they were at each other's throats. 3. There were talks about leaving the BN. And now we are seeing the first party to do so and to become an independent party. 4. Where before all parties avoided raising sensitive issues in public, now in the name of democracy and liberalism sensitive issues are brought up in which the component parties of the BN make known the differences in their view. The result is to widen the divide separating the BN component parties. 5. When Ahmad Ismail made unpalatable remarks about the Chinese, it was made out that it was the view of UMNO itself. Far from denying it, the UMNO leadership accepted the blame and apologised. This solved nothing as the Chinese parties refused to accept the apology but demanded the culprit himself should apologise. 6. He refused and UMNO whose president heads the Government suspended Ahmad for three years. This may satisfy some Chinese but almost immediately the Government arrested a Chinese MP under ISA. The effects of Ahmad's suspension have been nullified. 7. Now the Malays are angry with the Chinese and the Chinese are angry with the Malays. Party-wise UMNO is angry with Gerakan and MCA and Gerakan/MCA are angry with UMNO.
    [Show full text]
  • The Senate and the House of Representatives 1
    Why It Matters The Senate and the Ask students to imagine that they have one of the most important jobs in gov- House of Representatives ernment. Tell them that they work long TAKING As you read, take hours to help people, and that they are BEFORE YOU READ NOTES paid well for their efforts. Ask students notes on the Senate The Main Idea Focus Questions Key Terms and the House of Represen- how they feel about this job. Now tell tatives. Use a chart like this them that every two years they have to Congress is divided 1. What are the two houses bicameral legislature, one to record your notes. into two houses, the of Congress? p. 136 battle to keep their job for only another Senate and the House of 2. What are the qualifications, apportioned, p. 136 U.S. Congress two years. How do they feel now? Representatives, and its salaries, and rules of conduct gerrymandering, p. 137 Two Houses Congress Members Explain to students that members of the members have certain for members of Congress? immunity, p. 138 qualifications. House of Representatives face exactly expulsion, p. 139 this situation. censure, p. 139 Key Terms Preteach the following terms: When your town decides local issues, The House of Representatives bicameral legislature lawmaking body of such as funding for a road or a new According to the Constitution, the number two houses (p. 136) school tax, each voter has a say. This of representatives each state can elect to the apportioned distributed (p. 136) is direct democracy. On a national House is based on the state’s population.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth Parliamentary Association
    COMMONWEALTH PARLIAMENTARY ASSOCIATION REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE UNITED KINGDOM BRANCH 2008/09 COMMONWEALTH PARLIAMENTARY ASSOCIATION REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE UNITED KINGDOM BRANCH 2008/09 COMMONWEALTH PARLIAMENTARY ASSOCIATION UNITED KINGDOM BRANCH Presidents RT HON. BARONESS HAYMAN (Lord Speaker) RT HON. MICHAEL MARTIN MP (Speaker of the House of Commons) Vice-Presidents RT HON. BARONESS BOOTHROYD OF SANDWELL RT HON. GORDON BROWN MP (Prime Minister) RT HON. LORD CARRINGTON KG GCMG CH MC DL RT HON. LORD FALCONER OF THOROTON QC RT HON. LORD HOWE OF ABERAVON CH QC RT HON. LORD HURD OF WESTWELL CH CBE RT HON. DAVID CAMERON MP RT HON. LORD IRVINE OF LAIRG QC RT HON. LORD MACKAY OF CLASHFERN KT RT HON. LORD OWEN CH RT HON. JACK STRAW MP RT HON. BARONESS THATCHER LG OM FRS Chairman of the UK Branch RT HON. GORDON BROWN MP (Prime Minister) Executive Committee Chair Mr JOHN AUSTIN MP Joint Vice-Chairs RT HON. LORD ANDERSON OF SWANSEA DL (until 21 July 2008) MR DAVID CLELLAND MP (until 21 July 2008) SIR NICHOLAS WINTERTON DL MP (until 21 July 2008) RT HON. JOHN MCFALL MP (from 21 July 2008) MS ANN MCINTOSH MP (from 21 July 2008) BARONESS NORTHOVER (from 21 July 2008) Honorary Treasurer RT HON. SIR JOHN STANLEY MP Members MR JOHN AUSTIN MP (Chair) RT HON. SIR JOHN STANLEY MP (Hon. Treasurer) RT HON. LORD ANDERSON OF SWANSEA DL RT HON. KEVIN BARRON MP MR HUGH BAYLEY MP DR ROBERTA BLACKMAN-WOODS MP RT HON. GORDON BROWN MP (ex-officio) MR PETER BOTTOMLEY MP RT HON.
    [Show full text]
  • MANAGING PARLIAMENT BETTER? a Business Committee for The
    MANAGING PARLIAMENT BETTER? A Business Committee for the House of Commons edited by Meg Russell and Akash Paun with contributions from Oonagh Gay, Elizabeth McLeay, John Uhr and Barry Winetrobe August 2006 ISBN: 1 903 903 50 6 Published by The Constitution Unit Department of Political Science UCL (University College London) 29–30 Tavistock Square London WC1H 9QU Tel: 020 7679 4977 Fax: 020 7679 4978 Email: [email protected] Web: www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/ © The Constitution Unit, UCL 2006 This report is sold subject to the condition that is shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, hired out or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. First Published August 2006 Contents Preface............................................................................................................................................................4 Executive Summary .....................................................................................................................................5 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................6 The Organisation of Business in the House of Commons....................................................................7 Past Proposals for Reform........................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Systems in Asean – Singapore Chapter 3 – Government and the State
    Government and the State LEGAL SYSTEMS IN ASEAN – SINGAPORE CHAPTER 3 – GOVERNMENT AND THE STATE THIO Li-ann* A. INTRODUCTION: THE ADOPTION OF A MODIFIED VARIANT OF THE WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM Upon attaining independence on 9 August 1965 after peacefully seceding from the Federation of Malaysia, Singapore retained a legal system that is essentially based on the British legal system, a colonial legacy, importing the common law and the Westminster model of parliamentary government, with some notable modifications, including a written constitution. Article 4 declares that the Constitution “is the supreme law of the Republic of Singapore”; hence any legislation which is inconsistent with the Constitution is void, to the extent of that inconsistency. The Westminster model of representative democracy is predicated on a bipartisan or multi-party system, where the ultimate political check resides in the ability of an opposition party to defeat the incumbent government at general elections and form an alternative government. This check of political turnover is absent in Singapore as the ruling party has a dominant majority in Parliament. B. PRINCIPLES OF CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT Separation of Powers Singapore has a unicameral Parliament which currently has 84 elected seats. 82 of these seats are held by the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) while the other 2 are held by Chiam See Tong (Singapore People’s Party) and Low Thia Khiang (Worker’s Party). Government is based on a variant of the separation of powers principle, organised around the familiar trichotomy of powers: the legislature, the executive and the judiciary. Unlike the UK Parliament, the Singapore Parliament is a body constituted under, and deriving powers from, the Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Whips and Party Cohesion in the Ontario Legislature
    ‘Just try to keep them happy’: Whips and party cohesion in the Ontario Legislature By Craig Ruttan 2011-12 Intern Ontario Legislature Internship Programme (OLIP) 1303A Whitney Block Queen’s Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1A2 Phone: 416-325-0040 [email protected] www.olipinterns.ca DRAFT: Do not cite without permission of the author. Paper presented at the 2012 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Edmonton, Alberta. Friday June 15, 2012. 1 Introduction Among the various leadership roles within a party caucus, few are less well understood than that of the whip. Party whips are often unknown in the public, rarely sit in their party’s front bench, and are seldom quoted in the media. In addition, very little academic literature exists on the roles and functions of the office. When discussion of a whip does arise, it is usually about the imposition of sanctions on another member for disobeying a whipped vote. Because of this, whips are perceived as the secret enforcers of party discipline, threatening and bullying members into following the party line. While maintaining party cohesion is a prime objective for whips, the role is much more complex than has been presented. This paper explores the dynamics of the whip within the broader context of party politics in the Ontario Legislature. Drawing on the existing literature, personal interviews, and experiential research, I identify the characteristics of the whip’s office unique to Queen’s Park and, more specifically, the current parliament wherein no party holds a majority of seats. This paper focuses on two questions: how a whip’s role is affected by organizational structures and minority government, and to what extent whips are able to maintain party cohesion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Public Interest Litigation In
    The Role of Public Interest Litigation in Promoting 58 Good Governance in Malaysia and Singapore (2004) XXXIII No 1 THE ROLE OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION IN PROMOTING GOOD GOVERNANCE IN MALAYSIA AND SINGAPORE* ROGER TAN KOR MEE** SUMMARY: In this paper, a two-case study is undertaken on public interest litigation in the promotion of good governance in Malaysia and Singapore. As public interest litigation is a branch of administrative law which involves judicial review of administrative actions, it has a pivotal role to play in an administrative state particularly in the promotion of good governance. Initiated by citizens who may not be directly affected by the administrative acts, such public interest litigants are often frowned upon by the executive as meddlesome busybodies. This makes them a thorn in the executive’s side, and various obstacles were placed in the way by the executive to stymie the growth of public interest litigation. However, it was judicial self-restraint that brought the growth of public interest litigation in Malaysia to a grinding halt. In Government of Malaysia v Lim Kit Siang, the Malaysian Supreme Court took a restrictive approach to the rules of standing. But that does not mean that public-spirited individuals and non-governmental organisations should lose heart. On the contrary, they should persevere and continue to resort to public interest litigation so that it affords an opportunity for the courts to liberalise the current restrictive standing criteria. On the other hand, the absence of public interest litigation in Singapore presupposes that Singapore has a good public administration. Public interest litigation therefore promotes good governance in public administration.
    [Show full text]
  • The People's House
    THE PEOPLE’S HOUSE On the cover: This scene by artist Samuel Smith Kilburn depicts debate in the House Chamber from 1884. At the time, large landscape paintings by the renowned artist Albert Bierstadt hung alongside the portraits of George Washington and the Marquis de Lafayette on either side of the rostrum. Collection of the U.S. House of Representatives THE PEOPLE’S HOUSE CONTENTS BECOMING MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE . 2 Beginning a New Congress . 4 Opening Day Election of the Speaker Dean of the House and Swearing-in of the Speaker Administering the Oath to the Members-Elect Announcing Party Leadership, Electing Officers, and Passing Rules Seating in the House Chamber over Time . 7 HOUSE GEOGRAPHY . 8 Old Hall of the House . 9 Lindy Claiborne Boggs Congressional Women’s Reading Room National Statuary Hall 1857 House Wing . 11 Current House Chamber House Galleries Press Gallery Speaker’s Lobby Rayburn Room Board of Education Members’ Dining Room and House Restaurant Members and Family Room Cloakrooms House Office Buildings . 15 Cannon Longworth Rayburn Ford O’Neill Modern Office Lottery iii INSIDE THE HOUSE CHAMBER . .18 Rostrum Gavel Inkstand Hopper American Flag Mace Fasces Washington Portrait Lafayette Portrait Electronic Voting System Televised Proceedings Other Artifacts in the House Chamber . 25 Daniel Webster Plaque Lawgiver Relief Portraits Additional Art in the House . 26 Westward the Course of Empire Takes Its Way Signing of the Constitution Member Firsts and Milestones PEOPLE OF THE HOUSE . 28 Leadership . 29 Speaker of the House Majority Leader Minority Leader Whip Parties . 33 Democratic Caucus Republican Conference House Officers .
    [Show full text]
  • Makalah 3.Indd 23 6/7/2011 9:20:32 AM 24 Akademika 81(1)
    Akademika 81(1) 2011: 23-37 Framing of the 2008 Malaysian General Election Results by the English Language Press Pembingkaian Keputusan Pilihan Raya Umum Malaysia 2008 oleh Akhbar Bahasa Inggeris CHAI MING HOCK & ADNAN HUSSEIN ABSTRAK Keputusan Pilihan Raya Umum 2008 telah digelar sebagai ‘tsunami politik’ oleh pelbagai pihak. Dalam pilihan raya tersebut Barisan Nasional (BN) telah kehilangan majoriti simbolik dua-pertiga Parlimen. Dalam pada itu, parti-parti pembangkang secara kolektifnya berjaya mengawal dewan undangan negeri di lima buah negeri. Pada masa lalu, pilihan raya di Malaysia menjadi satu urusan yang terjangka dengan adanya capaian mudah BN kepada media, wang dan jentera kerajaan. Media cetak Malaysia memberi liputan positif dan menyeluruh kepada Barisan Nasional dalam tempoh sebelum hari mengundi. Bagaimana pula media cetak menjelaskan dan mentafsir keputusan pilihan raya yang tidak terjangka ini – teruk kepada BN mengikut piawaian politik Malaysia? Makalah ini membincangkan bagaimana media membingkaikan keputusan pilihan raya, faktor yang membawa kepada keputusan tersebut, serta mencari makna kepada persekitaran politik Malaysia. Kajian ini penting kerana media massa memainkan peranan penting dalam menentukan kerangka rujukan yang digunakan oleh pembaca untuk menafsirkan sesuatu kejadian atau isu. Makalah ini membincang pembingkaian keputusan Pilihan Raya Umum 2008 oleh akhbar bahasa Inggeris. Kutipan data melibatkan tiga akhbar bahasa Inggeris di Malaysia dengan analisis ke atas berita dan komentar, termasuk berita, rencana, lidah pengarang dan surat kepada editor dari hari mengundi pada 8hb Mac sehingga kepada hari pembentukan Kabinet baru Malaysia. Kata kunci: Malaysia, Pilihan Raya Umum, 2008, akhbar bahasa Inggeris, pembingkaian ABSTRACT Various observers heralded the 2008 Malaysian General Election as the ‘political tsunami’.
    [Show full text]
  • Reform of the House of Lords Contents
    Reform of the House of Lords Contents ExecutiveSummary ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 1 : Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 9 Chapter 2: The House of Lords in the 20th Century .................................................. 11 Chapter 3: Bicameralism - Theory and Practice ............................................................. 21 Chapter 4: Options for Reform ......................................................................................................... 33 Chapter 5: A Nominated Chamber ................................................................................................. 41 Chapter 6: An Elected Chamber ....................................................................................................... 59 Chapter 7: When and How? .................................................................................................................. 73 Chapter 8: Three Routes to Reform ............................................................................................. 83 Appendix A: Draft Parliament Bill ................................................................................................. 87 References ........................................................................................................................................................... 95 Executive Summary
    [Show full text]