Street Tree Inventory Report Mill Park Neighborhood November 2015 Street Tree Inventory Report: Mill Park Neighborhood November 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Street Tree Inventory Report Mill Park Neighborhood November 2015 Street Tree Inventory Report: Mill Park Neighborhood November 2015 Street Tree Inventory Report Mill Park Neighborhood November 2015 Street Tree Inventory Report: Mill Park Neighborhood November 2015 Written by: Carrie Black, Kat Davidson, Angie DiSalvo, Jeremy Grotbo, and Jeff Ramsey Portland Parks & Recreation Urban Forestry 503-823-4484 [email protected] http://portlandoregon.gov/parks/treeinventory Staff Neighborhood Coordinator: Rob Hanifin Data Collection Volunteers: Tony Mecum GIS Technical Support: Josh Darling, Portland Parks & Recreation Financial Support: Portland Parks & Recreation Cover Photos (from top left to bottom right): 1) The unusual fruit of a glorybower (Clerodendrum sp.) 2) A closeup on the dry cone of a cypress (Cupressus sp.) 3) A young pecan (Carya illinoinensis), rare in Portland. 4) Rosy margins on the leaves of a tricolor beech (Fagus sylvatica 'Tricolor'). 5) Fall color and woody fruit of a stewartia (Stewartia sp.) 6) The lush foliage of a Douglas-fir Pseudotsuga( menziesii), an important tree type in Mill Park. 7) Spiky foliage emerges from the trunk of a monkey puzzle tree (Araucaria araucana). 8) Vibrant fall color on a young tupelo (Nyssa sp.) ver. 11/18/2015 Portland Parks & Recreation 1120 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 1302 Portland, Oregon 97204 (503) 823-PLAY Commissioner Amanda Fritz www.PortlandParks.org Director Mike Abbaté Table of Contents Key Findings .......................................... 1 About Portland’s Street Tree Inventory . 3 Mill Park Street Tree Inventory ........................... 5 Neighborhood Characteristics ......................... 5 Urban Forest Composition............................ 6 Species diversity and tree type composition . 6 Functional tree type .............................. 8 Size class distribution ............................. 9 Mature tree form distribution ..................... 10 Importance value................................ 10 Tree Condition .................................... 11 Planting Site Composition and Stocking Level ........... 13 Planting sites................................... 13 Stocking level .................................. 14 Right tree in the right place ....................... 14 Replacement Value ................................. 15 Environmental and Aesthetic Benefits .................. 16 The Future Forest of Mill Park ....................... 17 Recommendations ..................................... 21 Next Steps: Tree Plans and Tree Teams .................... 23 References ........................................... 25 Appendices........................................... 27 A: Methods ....................................... 27 B: Street trees of Mill Park by tree type ................. 29 C: Street trees of Mill Park by size (map)................ 31 D: Vulnerability to key pests (map)..................... 32 E: Young street trees (trees ≤ 3” DBH) (map)............. 33 F: Large street trees (trees > 24” DBH) (map) ............ 34 G: Poor and dead street trees (map) .................... 35 H: Planting site types (map) .......................... 36 I: Planting site sizes (map)............................ 37 J: Available street tree planting sites (map) ............... 38 K: Priority street tree planting sites (map) ............... 39 Portland Parks & Recreation i Portland Parks & Recreation Urban Forestry staff collected data on all 1,167 street trees within the Mill Park neighborhood to compile the neighborhood’s first complete street tree inventory. The data are being used to inform the creation of a Neighborhood Tree Plan to guide interested volunteers in caring for their community’s trees. ii Street Tree Inventory Report – Mill Park Neighborhood 2015 Key Findings This report provides the results of a street tree inventory conducted in the Mill Park neighborhood in 2015, along with Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R) Urban Forestry staff recommendations for the Mill Park tree team. It took one volunteer four hours plus additional staff time to collect data on each of the neighborhood’s 1,167 street trees. URBAN FOREST STRUCTURE • Mill Park’s street tree population is dominated by maple, cherry, Douglas-fir, dogwood, and plum and does not meet recommended species diversity guidelines. While 76 tree types were found in this inventory, only two families, Rosaceae and Sapindaceae, account for more than 43% of the street tree resource. Furthermore, both the Acer (maple) and Prunus (plum, cherry) genera are over represented leaving Mill Park’s street tree population vulnerable to pests, pathogens, and effects of a changing climate. The dominance of broadleaf deciduous trees found in this inventory points to a need to diversify functional, as well as genetic, diversity in order to maximize value and create a more resilient, sustainable urban forest. • There are many young trees in Mill Park. This is likely the result of successful tree planting efforts in recent years and provides an opportunity for inexpensive young tree maintenance activities that will reduce future costs and ensure the longevity of these trees. If young trees are properly cared for today, Mill Park will have a healthier age distribution of street trees in the future. • Only 28% of Mill Park’s street trees are large form varieties. Large form trees are necessary to increase canopy cover and the benefits they provide for Mill Park’s residents. Planting the estimated 195 large available spaces identified in this inventory will maximize tree canopy in Mill Park’s rights-of-way. TREE CONDITION • The majority of trees inventoried in Mill Park are in fair or good condition, however, 43% of the trees that are rated poor are in the Prunus genus. PLANTING SITES AND STOCKING LEVEL • Only 37% of street tree planting sites have trees in Mill Park. Planting efforts should focus on the largest sites with no overhead high voltage wires first, as large form trees will provide the most long- term benefits to the neighborhood. • More than 65% of empty planting sites are located in unimproved planting sites without curbs or sidewalks. This represents an opportunity to plant large form trees. URBAN FOREST VALUE AND BENEFITS • Mill Park’s street trees produce an estimated $90,399 annually in environmental and aesthetic benefits. The replacement value of this resource is $3.4 million. Planting efforts focused on appropriately sized trees distributed across the neighborhood will ensure that future benefits are equitably distributed among all residents. Portland Parks & Recreation 1 Clockwise from top left: 1) Alaska-cedar (Chamaecyparis nootkatensis) is an evergreen conifer with attractive weeping branches. It is well-suited to the many unimproved planting sites in Mill Park, however, its strong central leader makes it inappropriate for planting under high voltage wires. 2) Maples, like this native bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), comprise more than 17% of all trees in the neighborhood. 3) At 51.4" DBH this Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) is the largest diameter street tree in the Mill Park neighborhood. 4) Creating room for new and existing large trees will be important as streets undergo development in Mill Park. 2 Street Tree Inventory Report – Mill Park Neighborhood 2015 About Portland’s Street Tree Inventory THE IMPORTANCE OF STREET TREES Street trees are an important public asset in urban environments, serving as a buffer between our transportation corridors and our homes while enhancing the livability of our city. As integral components of a community’s green infrastructure, street trees provide multiple economic, environmental, and social benefits such as cleaner air and water, cooler summer temperatures, safer streets, and increased property values. Unlike traditional, “grey” infrastructure, which begins to deteriorate the moment it is installed, the benefits that street trees provide increase over the lifetime of the tree, making their planting and maintenance one of the best investments a city and its residents can make. While street trees are only one component of Portland’s urban forest, they are particularly important because they are the trees that residents Urban forests are complex, living interact with most. Having adequate information resources that interact both about the street tree population allows a community to make informed decisions about species selection, positively and negatively with the planting, and maintenance priorities. Information on surrounding environment. They the location, condition, and diversity of the street tree produce multiple benefits and have population enables our communities to steward this resource and ensure its continued benefits into the associated management costs. In order future. Undertaking a street tree inventory is not only to fully realize the benefits, a sound an investment in the current and future well-being of the trees, but in the community itself. understanding of the urban forest THE INVENTORY PROCESS resource is needed. This understanding Portland’s Tree Inventory Project began with a pilot starts at the most basic level with a street tree inventory in 2010, and since then 46 neighborhoods have partnered with Urban Forestry forest inventory to provide baseline to inventory street trees and create action-oriented data for management decisions. Neighborhood Tree Plans. To date, volunteers have identified, measured, and mapped more than 150,000 street trees! Neighborhood groups interested in trees begin by gathering volunteers to help conduct an inventory. Urban Forestry staff provides training, tools, and event organization. Together information is collected
Recommended publications
  • Chile: a Journey to the End of the World in Search of Temperate Rainforest Giants
    Eliot Barden Kew Diploma Course 53 July 2017 Chile: A Journey to the end of the world in search of Temperate Rainforest Giants Valdivian Rainforest at Alerce Andino Author May 2017 1 Eliot Barden Kew Diploma Course 53 July 2017 Table of Contents 1. Title Page 2. Contents 3. Table of Figures/Introduction 4. Introduction Continued 5. Introduction Continued 6. Aims 7. Aims Continued / Itinerary 8. Itinerary Continued / Objective / the Santiago Metropolitan Park 9. The Santiago Metropolitan Park Continued 10. The Santiago Metropolitan Park Continued 11. Jardín Botánico Chagual / Jardin Botanico Nacional, Viña del Mar 12. Jardin Botanico Nacional Viña del Mar Continued 13. Jardin Botanico Nacional Viña del Mar Continued 14. Jardin Botanico Nacional Viña del Mar Continued / La Campana National Park 15. La Campana National Park Continued / Huilo Huilo Biological Reserve Valdivian Temperate Rainforest 16. Huilo Huilo Biological Reserve Valdivian Temperate Rainforest Continued 17. Huilo Huilo Biological Reserve Valdivian Temperate Rainforest Continued 18. Huilo Huilo Biological Reserve Valdivian Temperate Rainforest Continued / Volcano Osorno 19. Volcano Osorno Continued / Vicente Perez Rosales National Park 20. Vicente Perez Rosales National Park Continued / Alerce Andino National Park 21. Alerce Andino National Park Continued 22. Francisco Coloane Marine Park 23. Francisco Coloane Marine Park Continued 24. Francisco Coloane Marine Park Continued / Outcomes 25. Expenditure / Thank you 2 Eliot Barden Kew Diploma Course 53 July 2017 Table of Figures Figure 1.) Valdivian Temperate Rainforest Alerce Andino [Photograph; Author] May (2017) Figure 2. Map of National parks of Chile Figure 3. Map of Chile Figure 4. Santiago Metropolitan Park [Photograph; Author] May (2017) Figure 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Amelanchier Alnifolia. Araucaria Araucana
    Woodland Garden Plants The present-day cultivation of large areas of single annual crops such as wheat might seem, on the surface, to be a very productive and efficient use of land (average wheat yields this century have increased more than three-fold to over 3 tons per acre). When other factors are taken into account, however, it can be argued that this is a very unproductive and unsustainable use of the land. A woodland, on the other hand, might seem to be a very unproductive area for human food (unless you happen to like eating acorns). By choosing the right species, however, a woodland garden can produce a larger crop of food than the same area of wheat, will require far less work to manage it and will be able to be sustainably harvested without harm to the soil or the environment in general. I do not intend to go into any more details of the pros and cons of annuals versus perennials here. If you would like more information on this subject then please see our leaflet Why Perennials. One of the main reasons why a woodland garden can be so productive is that such a wide range of plants can be grown together, making much more efficient use of the land. The greater the diversity of plants being grown together then the greater the overall growth of plant matter there is. Thus you can have tall growing trees with smaller trees and shrubs that can tolerate some shade growing under them. Climbing plants can make their own ways up the trees and shrubs towards the light, whilst shade- tolerant herbaceous plants and bulbs can grow on the woodland floor.
    [Show full text]
  • Ventnor Botanic Garden
    Dinosaurs and plants DAWN REDWOOD – Metasequoia glyptostroboides The discovery of this conifer in Szechuan in 1947 created a The Isle of Wight is one of the most important dinosaur horticultural sensation. It was recognised as a descendant of discovery and excavation sites in the world. More than trees from the Carboniferous period, which means it dates back twenty types have now been found, all within a few miles to a time before even the dinosaurs had evolved. of Ventnor Botanic Garden. CYCADS – Cycas revolute In early Cretaceous times when dinosaurs ruled, plant Cycads were the most frequent plants in a life was abundant but very different from now. Just a few dinosaur landscape. Fossils of their 'dinosaur plants' have survived. Ventnor Botanic Garden distinctive cones – like pineapples, to Ventnor Botanic Garden is which they are related – are found on the fortunate to house some of the Island. Though no longer most important ‘living fossils’ widespread, many species of Cycad thrive that covered the Earth during in warmer climates. There is a Cycad with- the time of the dinosaurs. The Isle of Wight in the Early in the garden that is flowering—this is the Cretaceous period 125 million first flowering Cycad in 250 MILLION years ago years! Can you find it? MAGNOLIA – Magnolia spp GINKGO TREES – Ginkgo biloba This ancient and beautiful group of plants evolved towards the The Ginkgo tree has remained the same over 240 million end of the dinosaur age, and is one of the very first flowering years and its distinctive leaf shape is instantly recognisable plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Tortworth Arboretum
    4 5 bee 3 garden ARENA With the help of a team of dedicated volunteers we 2 have restored lost pathways, uncovered hidden redwoods 6 features and created new routes around the 7 arboretum. Below is a pick of our favourite trees! STILE 1 Hungarian Oak (Quercus frainetto) 2 Veteran Common Oak (Quercus robur) 8 3 DONKEY BRIDGE Veteran Sweet Chestnuts (Castanea sativa) 1 4 Monkey Puzzle (Araucaria araucana) 9 5 Caucasian Alder (Alnus subcordata) 6 Coastal Redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) PUBLIC FOOTPATH 7 Handkerchief Tree (Davidia involucrata) subsp. 8 (Fraxinus angustifolia 10 Narrow Leaved Ash angustifolia) GATE 11 MAIN 9 Contorted Hazel (Corylus avellana ‘Contorta’) CAMPFIRE 10 Indian Chestnut (Aesculus indica) 11 TOILET Japanese Chestnut (Aesculus turbinata) 12 12 Dawn Redwood (Metasequoia glyptostroboides) 13 Hornbeam (Carpinus betulus) Find us online for details of volunteering opportunities 13 and events, plus more maps and history of the arboretum. https://tortwortharboretum.org ENTRANCE GATE 1 Hungarian Oak (Quercus frainetto) 8 Narrow Leaved Ash (Fraxinus angustifolia subsp. angustifolia) One of our champion trees, over five meters in circumference. Look Grown on common ash root stock, this is a particularly large mature out for the large lobed leaves. (Southeastern Europe and Turkey) specimen for the UK. (Western Europe, northwest Africa) 2 Common Oak (Quercus robur) 9 Contorted Hazel (Corylus avellana ‘Contorta’) This vetern ‘English Oak’ is estimated to be over 350 years old and A natural mutation of common hazel, famously first discovered in a predates the arboretum, being planted as part of a former deer hedgerow at Frocester in 1863. All contorted hazels, including this park.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountains Influence Distribution
    South America - mountains influence distribution The continent joins Mesoamerica, the landbridge from Panama to Mexico, connecting the South Winteraceae - One of Tasmania’s South American relatives Winteraceae family distribution American plant communities to the North American. Captain John Winter was one of Sir Francis Drake’s captains at the start of Drake’s raiding, in the years 1577 and Our collection includes plants from cooler southern end of the continent and from the higher 1578, of the Spanish colonies in what are now Chile and Peru. mountain areas of the Andes. Winter discovered the healing properties of the tree bark while on this expedition from England, and it became known as “Winter’s Bark”. It was used in a tea to treat the effects of scurvy. Mountain influences The specific name winterii is in commemoration of John Winter. Its local common name is canelo. The tree is in the family Winteraceae, again commemorative, along with the Tasmanian endemic, mountain pepper [Tasmannia The Andes stretch down the western side of South America as the Rockies do through North America, both formed by lanceolata]. continental plate movement. These mountain ranges reach up to 6,000m in altitude and cross from the polar through the The Winteraceae also occur on the Atlantic Coast of Brazil and other places in the north of South America and in Central America, around temperate to the tropical zones. the Tasman and Coral Seas and through Papua New Guinea to Borneo and the Philippines. Many other Southern hemisphere plant families Mountains influence plant distribution, acting as climate modifiers, physical barriers to plant distribution, and as refuges have these wide global distributions, evidence of continental drift.
    [Show full text]
  • Trees of Bayview Cemetery
    1 Bigleaf Maple (n) Acer macrophyllum 40 English Midland Hawthorn Crataegus laevigata 2 Japanese Dwarf Maple Acer palmatum 41 Japanese Snowbell Tree Styrax japonica 3 Norway Maple Acer platanoides 42 Yulan Magnolia Magnolia denudata 3a Crimson King Norway Acer platanoides ‘Crimson King’ 43 Dawn Redwood Metasequoia glyptostroboides Trees of Bayview Cemetery Maple ‘ 44 Monkey Puzzle Araucaria araucana 4 Paperbark Maple Acer griseum 45 Flowering Pear Pyrus calleryana ‘Cleveland Select’ This map shows one representative tree from each species found at 5 Red Maple Acer rubrum ‘Cleveland Select’ Bayview. For a complete map, please visit Park Operations, located 6 Vine Maple (n) Acer circinatum 46 White Ash Fraxinus americana across the street from Bayview Cemetary at 1400 Woburn St. 7 Red Snakebark Maple Acer capillipes 47 Smoothleaf Elm Ulmus minor clone or hybrid 8 Sugar Maple Acer saccharum clone or hybrid Trees of 9 Western Redcedar (n) Thuja plicata 47a Jersey or Guernsey Elm Ulmus minor ‘Sarniensis’ 10 Northern White Cedar Thuja occidentalis 48* Wych Elm Ulmus glabra 11 Oriental Arborvitae Thuja orientalis 49 Rhododendron Rhododendron sp. Bayview 12* Port Orford Cedar Chamaecyparis lawsoniana 50 Persian Ironwood Parrotia persica 13 Sawara Cypress Chamaecyparis pisifera 51 Austrian Pine Pinus nigra 13a Plume Sawara Cypress Chamaecyparis pisifera f. plumosa 52 Common Horse Chestnut Aesculus hippocastanum 13b Moss Sawara Cypress Chamaecyparis pisifera f. squarrosa 53 Ginkgo or Maidenhair Tree Ginkgo biloba Cemetery 13c Threadbranch Sawara Chamaecyparis pisifera f. filifera 54 Goldenchain Laburnum anagyroides Cypress 55 Atlas Cedar Cedrus atlantica 14 Mazzard Cherry Prunus avium 56 European Hazel Corylus avellana 15 Canada Red Chokecherry Prunus virginiana 57 Black Locust Robinia pseudoacacia ‘Canada Red’ 58 Sweetgum Liquidambar styraciflua 16 Cherry Plum Prunus ceracifera 59 Eastern Redcedar Juniperus virginiana 16a Purpleleaf Plum Prunus ceracifera 60 English Holly Ilex aquifolium f.
    [Show full text]
  • Araucaria Araucana in West Norway*
    petala (Rosaceae), an interesting dwarf subshrub. This has pinnate dentate leaves, decorative fruits, and large single white flowers borne about 15 cm above the ground. Another attractive shrub in this area is Myrica tomentosa, related to the European M. gale. This grows to about 1m high, has a characteristic resinous smell and flowers before the pubescent young shoots and leaves appear. Also here are numerous tiny orchids of the genera Hammarbya, Platanthera, and Listera, which in most parts of Europe are rare or endangered, and, on the black beach, the pale blue, funnel-shaped flowers of Mertensia maritima. On the shores of Lake Nachikinsky (360 m above sea level) we had an unforgettable view of thousands of bright red, spawning sockeye salmon. From here we travelled on to the eastern, Pacific coast of Kamchatka, where the sand on the deserted beach was almost black, and the water considerably warmer than on the west coast. Here we camped behind a range of low semi-overgrown sandy dunes, which ran parallel to the ocean prior to merging inland into a large flat plain with heath-like vegetation, with tundra and aquatic species, especial- ly along streams and in hollows. This was the only place where we found Rosa rugosa, growing among scattered bushes of Pinus pumila. We ended our expedition high in the mountains, on the slopes of the Avachinsky and Korjaksky volcanoes, where perennial snowfields gave rise to numerous streams, an uncommon sight in the volcanic landscape of Kamchatka. Here, well above the tree line, the flora was again decidedly alpine, and this was the only place where we encoun- tered the unusual evergreen dwarf ericaceous shrub, Bryanthus gmelinii, with spikes of small pink flowers.
    [Show full text]
  • Gymnosperms on the EDGE Félix Forest1, Justin Moat 1,2, Elisabeth Baloch1, Neil A
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Gymnosperms on the EDGE Félix Forest1, Justin Moat 1,2, Elisabeth Baloch1, Neil A. Brummitt3, Steve P. Bachman 1,2, Stef Ickert-Bond 4, Peter M. Hollingsworth5, Aaron Liston6, Damon P. Little7, Sarah Mathews8,9, Hardeep Rai10, Catarina Rydin11, Dennis W. Stevenson7, Philip Thomas5 & Sven Buerki3,12 Driven by limited resources and a sense of urgency, the prioritization of species for conservation has Received: 12 May 2017 been a persistent concern in conservation science. Gymnosperms (comprising ginkgo, conifers, cycads, and gnetophytes) are one of the most threatened groups of living organisms, with 40% of the species Accepted: 28 March 2018 at high risk of extinction, about twice as many as the most recent estimates for all plants (i.e. 21.4%). Published: xx xx xxxx This high proportion of species facing extinction highlights the urgent action required to secure their future through an objective prioritization approach. The Evolutionary Distinct and Globally Endangered (EDGE) method rapidly ranks species based on their evolutionary distinctiveness and the extinction risks they face. EDGE is applied to gymnosperms using a phylogenetic tree comprising DNA sequence data for 85% of gymnosperm species (923 out of 1090 species), to which the 167 missing species were added, and IUCN Red List assessments available for 92% of species. The efect of diferent extinction probability transformations and the handling of IUCN data defcient species on the resulting rankings is investigated. Although top entries in our ranking comprise species that were expected to score well (e.g. Wollemia nobilis, Ginkgo biloba), many were unexpected (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Arboretum News Armstrong News & Featured Publications
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Arboretum News Armstrong News & Featured Publications Arboretum News Number 5, Summer 2006 Armstrong State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/armstrong-arbor- news Recommended Citation Armstrong State University, "Arboretum News" (2006). Arboretum News. 5. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/armstrong-arbor-news/5 This newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by the Armstrong News & Featured Publications at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Arboretum News by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Arboretum News A Newsletter of the Armstrong Atlantic State University Arboretum Issue 5 Summer 2006 Watch Your Step in the Primitive Garden Arboretum News Arboretum News, published by the Grounds Department Plants from the Past of Armstrong Atlantic State University, is distributed to Living Relatives of Ancient faculty, staff, students, and friends of the Arboretum. The Arboretum Plants in the Primitive Garden encompasses Armstrong’s 268- acre campus and displays a wide By Philip Schretter variety of shrubs and other woody plants. Developed areas of campus he Primitive Garden, contain native and introduced Tlocated next to Jenkins species of trees and shrubs, the Hall on the Armstrong majority of which are labeled. Atlantic State University Natural areas of campus contain campus, allows you to take plants typical in Georgia’s coastal a walk through time by broadleaf evergreen forests such as displaying living relatives of live oak, southern magnolia, red ancient plants. The following bay, horse sugar, and sparkleberry.
    [Show full text]
  • Austral Weeks: Botanizing in the Southern Hemisphere Rob Nicholson
    Austral Weeks: Botanizing in the Southern Hemisphere Rob Nicholson Among the amazing plants of Chile’s temperate rainforests, two conifers stand out, both unique to their region and both of great beauty-the alerce and the monkey puzzle tree. favorite childhood excursion for my brates arranged chronologically over a 300- brother and me involved a visit to Yale million-year period. It was a viscerally potent JL .~- University’s Peabody Museum of Natu- image, one that still triggers memories instantly ral History, where we would stand transfixed in whenever I see a picture of the mural. front of the magnificent skeleton of a full-sized I recently returned to the Peabody, this time apatosaurus in the massive Hall of Dinosaurs. with my own children in tow. They too were Equally favorite was Rudolph Zallinger’s stun- enamored of the apatosaurus skeleton and ran ning 110-foot mural depicting groups of verte- eagerly around the exhibits prattling about sharptooths and bumpyheads. As I stood before Zallinger’s mural, I real- ized how thoroughly my own mterests had changed in the thirty years since I had last seen it. Only now did I notice that in the interest of historical accu- racy, the artist had included in his painting the flora that was associated geologically with the dinosaurs; under ginkgo boughs, tyrannosaurus scouted for victims, while triceratops and ankylosaurus warily grazed in arbors bordered by magnolia and palmetto palm. It was a vivid reminder that these plants, the forebearers of today’s flora, existed over one hundred million years before their modern descendants.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Wood Forest Products from Conifers
    NO\ -WOOD FOREST PROaCTS 12 Non-wood forest products from conifers Food and Agriculture Organizahon of the United Nations NO \--WOOD FOREST PRODUCTS 12 Non-wood forest products from conifers by William M. Ciesla European Forest Institute FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 1998 Reprinted 2001 This paper discusses both traditional and contemporary uses of products from conifers. This material is presented for information only and does not imply endorsement by the author or by FAO. Some of those products have medicinal purposes; however, they should only be used under the care and guidance of a qualified physician. Transport of certain non-wood forest products (e.g. foliage, Christmas trees, seeds and landscape or ornamental plants) across international boundaries poses a risk of accidental transport and introduction of insects, fungi or other potentially destructive agents.Itis recommended that anyone planning to move plant materials across international boundaries check with appropriate authorities in the country from which the products are to be exported and the countries into which the products are to be imported for import permit requirements or restrictions which might apply. Movement of non-wood forest products across international boundaries may be subject to trade restrictions (both tariff and non-tariff). Appropriate authorities should be contacted prior to planned movement of any non-wood forest products across international boundaries. A review of trade restrictions affecting international trade in non-wood forest products may be found in Non-Wood Forest Products No. 8, 1995. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • (Araucaria Araucana) En La Cordillera De Nahuelbuta, Chile
    BOSQUE 29(2): 170-175, 2008 AraucariaBOSQUE 29(2): enana 170-175, en la cordillera2008 DOI: de 10.4067/s0717-92002008000200010 Nahuelbuta NOTA Poblaciones de araucaria enana (Araucaria araucana) en la Cordillera de Nahuelbuta, Chile Populations of dwarf araucaria (Araucaria araucana) in the Nahuelbuta coastal range, Chile Claudio Donosoa*, Mauro E. Gonzáleza,d, Marco Cortésb, Conrado Gonzálezc, Pablo Donosoa,d, Marcelo Hernándezb *Autor de correspondencia: aUniversidad Austral de Chile, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, casilla 567, Valdivia, Chile, tel.: 56-63-221228, fax: 56-63-221230, [email protected] bUniversidad Católica de Temuco, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Temuco, Chile. cCorporación Nacional Forestal, Región de Los Ríos, Valdivia, Chile. dNúcleo Científico Milenio FORECOS, Valdivia, Chile. SUMMARY Araucaria araucana (araucaria or pehuén) can normally reach > 20 m in height in most sites where it grows. However, two dwarf populations of A. Araucana were found at the top of the Nahuelbuta coastal range. This study had the goal of characterizing the structure, composition, ages and chemical and physical soil properties of both populations. These populations are dominated by A. araucana, with Nothofagus dombeyi as the main associated species. Dwarfism is clear in both species. Individuals of A. araucana rarely exceeded 10 m in height with a high diameter/height relationship compared with similarly-aged normal trees. The diameter annual growth is lower than 0.12 cm for trees 300 years in age and basal diameters of 36 cm. The presence of short stems and extended and fine branches, like spider legs, confirms the dwarf features of the A. araucana trees. In N. dombeyi 36 to 37 years in age the diameter annual growth is between 0.26 and 0.27 cm, where most individuals (60-75%) present basal diameters lower than 15 cm and heights between 1 and 6.5 m.
    [Show full text]