DOCSLIB.ORG

FP132: Enabling Implementation of Forest Sector Reform in Georgia to Reduce GHG Emissions from Forest Degradation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FP132: Enabling Implementation of Forest Sector Reform in Georgia to Reduce GHG Emissions from Forest Degradation FP132: Enabling Implementation of Forest Sector Reform in Georgia to Reduce GHG Emissions from Forest Degradation | | Georgia Deutsche Gesellschaft fuer Internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH(GIZ) Decision B.26/02 21 August 2020 Enabling Implementation of Forest Sector Reform in Georgia Project Title: to Reduce GHG Emissions from Forest Degradation Country: Georgia Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit Accredited Entity: (GIZ) GmbH Date of first submission: 2019/08/13 Date of current submission 2020/06/4 Version number V.008 GREEN CLIMATE FUND FUNDING PROPOSAL V.2.0 | PAGE 1 OF 92 Contents Section A PROJECT SUMMARY Section B PROJECT INFORMATION Section C FINANCING INFORMATION Section D EXPECTED PERFORMANCE AGAINST INVESTMENT CRITERIA Section E LOGICAL FRAMEWORK Section F RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT Section G GCF POLICIES AND STANDARDS Section H ANNEXES Note to Accredited Entities on the use of the funding proposal template • Accredited Entities should provide summary information in the proposal with cross- reference to annexes such as feasibility studies, gender action plan, term sheet, etc. • Accredited Entities should ensure that annexes provided are consistent with the details provided in the funding proposal. Updates to the funding proposal and/or annexes must be reflected in all relevant documents. • The total number of pages for the funding proposal (excluding annexes) should not exceed 60. Proposals exceeding the prescribed length will not be assessed within the usual service standard time. • The recommended font is Arial, size 11. • Under the GCF Information Disclosure Policy, project and programme funding proposals will be disclosed on the GCF website, simultaneous with the submission to the Board, subject to the redaction of any information that may not be disclosed pursuant to the IDP. Accredited Entities are asked to fill out information on disclosure in section G.4. Please submit the completed proposal to: [email protected] Please use the following name convention for the file name: “FP-[Accredited Entity Short Name]-[Country/Region]-[Dates]” GREEN CLIMATE FUND FUNDING PROPOSAL V.2.0 | PAGE 2 OF 92 A PROJECT SUMMARY A.1. Project or A.2. Public or private Project Public programme sector A.3. Request for Not applicable Proposals (RFP) Mitigation: Reduced emissions from: GCF contribution: Enter number% ☐ Energy access and power generation: Enter number% ☐ Low-emission transport: ☐ Buildings, cities, industries and appliances: Enter number% 100% ☒ Forestry and land use: Adaptation: Increased resilience of: Most vulnerable people, communities and regions: Enter number% ☐ Enter number% ☐ Health and well-being, and food and water security: Enter number% Infrastructure and built environment: ☐ Enter number% ☐ Ecosystem and ecosystem services: Direct beneficiaries: 98,337 Indirect beneficiaries: 1,000,000 A.5. Expected mitigation A.6. Expected 16.14 million tCO2eq impact adaptation impact Direct beneficiaries: 3% of national population Indirect beneficiaries: 27% of national population A.7. Total financing (GCF 177.69 million Euros + co-finance) A.9. Project size Medium (Upto USD 250 million) A.8. Total GCF funding 32.79 million Euros requested A.10. Financial Grant 32.79 million Euros Equity Enter number instrument(s) requested ☒ ☐ Loan Enter number for the GCF funding ☐ ☐ Results-based payment Enter number ☐ Guarantee Enter number A.11. Implementation 7 years (84 months) A.12. Total lifespan 20 years period A.13. Expected date of A.14. ESS category AE internal approval 7/4/2019 B A.16. Has Readiness A.15. Has this FP been or PPF support been submitted as a CN Yes No Yes No ☒ ☐ used to prepare this ☐ ☒ before? FP? A.17. Is this FP included A.18. Is this FP in the entity work Yes ☒ No ☐ included in the country Yes ☒ No ☐ programme? programme? A.19. Complementarity Yes No and coherence ☐ ☒ GREEN CLIMATE FUND FUNDING PROPOSAL V.2.0 | PAGE 3 OF 92 A The Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH besides being the Accredited Entity (AE) of the project, acts as well as an Executing Entity (EE). Besides GIZ, there will be the following other Executing Entities: • National Forestry Agency (NFA), a Legal Entity of Public Law (LEPL) of the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture (MoEPA) (Georgia). A.20. Executing Entity • Department of Environmental Supervision (DES) representing the Government of information Georgia, State Sub-Agency of MoEPA (Georgia). • Environmental Information and Education Centre (EIEC), a LEPL of MoEPA (Georgia). • Agricultural and Rural Development Agency (ARDA)1, a Non-Entrepreneurial (Non-Commercial) Legal Entity (N(N)LE) of MoEPA (Georgia). MoEPA acts as the National Designated Authority (NDA) for GCF in Georgia. A.21. Executive summary 1. Georgia’s forests play a pivotal role in securing net removal of GHG emissions, which are expected to rise by approx. 70 % to 28,690 Gg CO2eq in 2030 in the BAU scenarios. However, LULUCF sector absorption capacity is rapidly decreasing. Climate change impacts and the demand for fuelwood from rural population puts significant pressure on Georgia’s forests: up to 90% of rural households (1.43 million people) rely on fuel wood for their energy needs. This leads to forest degradation and loss of carbon absorption capacity, which is projected to decrease by five times between 1990 and 2030. The Government of Georgia therefore prioritized the forest sector in its Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) aiming at reducing GHG emissions by 6 million tCO2eq by introducing the sustainable forest management (SFM) on 250,000 ha of state-managed forest lands over a period of 2020-20302. 2. The project will enable the Government of Georgia to implement its transformational forest sector reform agenda to put the entire nation’s forests under the SFM framework. It will do so by supporting establishment of a nation-wide SFM system under Component 1 and in parallel, under Component 2, promoting market development for energy efficient (EE) and alternative fuels (AF)3 to address main driver of Georgia’s forest degradation, the unsustainable fuelwood consumption by rural population. Component 3, addressing potential adverse effects of the forest sector reform, safeguards the reform implementation by diversifying livelihood opportunities and strengthening local self- governance in forest adjoining rural communities. 3. The first component will help the Government put in place main building blocks of SFM at national level in the form of appropriate policy and regulatory environment, knowledge and data, as well as human and institutional capacities. At the regional level, the project will implement SFM in the three target regions of Kakheti, Mtskheta-Mtianeti and Guria. By doing so, the project will help develop an appropriate institutional structure and a business model for SFM, which will then be replicated to cover all forest areas in the country. Under second component, the project will accelerate growth of the nascent EE-AF sector in Georgia by pushing the development of supply chain and in parallel pulling the demand via consumer awareness raising, provision of financial incentives and consumer financing products in partnership with financial institutions, as well as creating conducive policy and regulatory framework for the sector in line with EU aquis, which the Government of Georgia has committed to implement. The third component will build up capacities of local authorities and citizens to participate in the sustainable management of forests and will enable communities of the target regions to benefit from diversified income opportunities by improved forest- related value chains and better access to forest-related knowledge and skills. 4. The project will cover 270,807 ha of state-managed forests in the target regions with SFM (over-achieving the NDC target of 250,000 ha).4 This will lead to the improvement of quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the forests and gradual build-up of carbon stock: Broader SFM implementation will lead to a reduction of forest degradation in the range of 0.8 t biomass per ha and year (1.3 tCO2/ha/year); in addition forest biomass will increase by 1.7 t biomass per ha and year (2.9 tCO2/ha/year) as a result of direct SFM measures. Further, availability of sustainably harvested fuelwood in the target districts will increase 5-fold from 50,000 m3 up to 285,575 m3 by the project end. 1 From July 1, 2019 the official title of Agricultural Projects Management Agency (APMA) was changed into Agricultural and Rural Development Agency (ARDA). 2 Conditional commitment. 3 Alternative fuels (AF) in the context of this Funding Proposal refer to different forms of upgraded solid biofuels (USB), which can be produced from woody or vegetable material by modern processes and technologies, such as briquettes, pellets, or chips sourced from forestry and agricultural residues (hazelnut shells, wine pruning, etc.). Please refer to Section 5.3.3.1 of the Feasibility Study for the full account of available AFs in Georgia 4 Note on the project area: The total forest area within the selected forest districts is 293,824 ha. The area analyzed in terms of forest degradation and mitigation impacts amounts to 270,807 ha. The area difference is due to the fact that some areas could not be attributed to a specific forest formation for which information on carbon stocks is available. See Feasibility Study Chapter 4 for more detail. GREEN CLIMATE FUND FUNDING PROPOSAL V.2.0 | PAGE 4 OF 92 A In addition, the Project will promote accelerated deployment of EE stoves and AF in the target regions to ensure up to 30% penetration by project end and up to 75% in the long-run. This will significantly diminish pressure on forest resources and demand for fuelwood from 100,000 rural households, i.e. by up to 360,000 m3 or 50% compared to baseline. Taken together, SFM and EE-AF adoption will make sure that supply of sustainably harvested biomass in the target regions can meet the demand thus effectively reducing the fuelwood gap, which currently stands at 580,000 m3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Apparel Familiarization Trip for Kardem Tekstil Company Final
    APPAREL FAMILIARIZATION TRIP FOR KARDEM TEKSTIL COMPANY FINAL Thursday, September 08, 2011 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Deloitte Consulting LLP. APPAREL FAMILIARIZATION TRIP FOR KARDEM TEKSTIL COMPANY FINAL USAID ECONOMIC PROSPERITY INITIATIVE (EPI) CONTRACT NUMBER: AID-114-C-10-00004 DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP USAID/CAUCASUS THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 08, 2011 DISCLAIMER: The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. DATA Author(s): Zviad Kvlividze, Apparel Sector Manager Reviewed By: Alan Saffery, Non-Agricultural Sectors Component Leader Name of Component: Non-Agriculture Sectors Practice Area: Apparel Key Words: apparel, outsourcing, investment, Kardem Tekstil ECONOMIC PROSPERITY INITIATIVE (EPI) i ABSTRACT This trip report describes the visit of potential Turkish investor, Kardem Tekstil, to Georgia to learn more about the Georgian apparel investment climate and local apparel market. Kardem is currently interested in looking closer at Georgia as a new investment and outsourcing markets. Contacts with Kardem Textile were established with assistance from EPI’s short-term consultant Selen Poyraz, Deloitte Consulting Istanbul Office. Kardem’s trip to Georgia was initiated, designed, organized, and implemented by EPI and the Georgian National Investment Agency (GNIA) after meeting the owner of Kardem Tekstil, Mr. Zeki Erdogan, at the 4th Istanbul Fashion and Apparel Conference in Turkey in May 2011. ECONOMIC PROSPERITY INITIATIVE (EPI) ii ABBREVIATIONS EPI Economic Prosperity Initiative GNIA Georgian National Investment Agency MoESD Ministry of Economy & Sustainable Development ECONOMIC PROSPERITY INITIATIVE (EPI) iii CONTENTS I.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Prosperity Initiative
    USAID/GEORGIA DO2: Inclusive and Sustainable Economic Growth October 1, 2011 – September 31, 2012 Gagra Municipal (regional) Infrastructure Development (MID) ABKHAZIA # Municipality Region Project Title Gudauta Rehabilitation of Roads 1 Mtskheta 3.852 km; 11 streets : Mtskheta- : Mtanee Rehabilitation of Roads SOKHUMI : : 1$Mestia : 2 Dushet 2.240 km; 7 streets :: : ::: Rehabilitation of Pushkin Gulripshi : 3 Gori street 0.92 km : Chazhashi B l a c k S e a :%, Rehabilitaion of Gorijvari : 4 Gori Shida Kartli road 1.45 km : Lentekhi Rehabilitation of Nationwide Projects: Ochamchire SAMEGRELO- 5 Kareli Sagholasheni-Dvani 12 km : Highway - DCA Basisbank ZEMO SVANETI RACHA-LECHKHUMI rehabilitaiosn Roads in Oni Etseri - DCA Bank Republic Lia*#*# 6 Oni 2.452 km, 5 streets *#Sachino : KVEMO SVANETI Stepantsminda - DCA Alliance Group 1$ Gali *#Mukhuri Tsageri Shatili %, Racha- *#1$ Tsalenjikha Abari Rehabilitation of Headwork Khvanchkara #0#0 Lechkhumi - DCA Crystal Obuji*#*# *#Khabume # 7 Oni of Drinking Water on Oni for Nakipu 0 Likheti 3 400 individuals - Black Sea Regional Transmission ZUGDIDI1$ *# Chkhorotsku1$*# ]^!( Oni Planning Project (Phase 2) Chitatskaro 1$!( Letsurtsume Bareuli #0 - Georgia Education Management Project (EMP) Akhalkhibula AMBROLAURI %,Tsaishi ]^!( *#Lesichine Martvili - Georgia Primary Education Project (G-Pried) MTSKHETA- Khamiskuri%, Kheta Shua*#Zana 1$ - GNEWRC Partnership Program %, Khorshi Perevi SOUTH MTIANETI Khobi *# *#Eki Khoni Tskaltubo Khresili Tkibuli#0 #0 - HICD Plus #0 ]^1$ OSSETIA 1$ 1$!( Menji *#Dzveli
    [Show full text]
  • 2.1.1～2.1.4 95/06/12
    Appendices Appendix-1 Member List of the Study Team (1) Field Survey 1. Dr. Yoshiko TSUYUKI Team Leader/ Technical Official, Experts Service Division, Technical Advisor Bureau of International Cooperation International Medical Center of Japan, Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare 2. Mr. Hideo EGUCHI Security Control Deputy Resident Representative, Planner United Kingdom Office (JICA) 3. Mr. Yoshimasa TAKEMURA Project Coordinator Staff, Second Management Division, Grant Aid Management Department (JICA) 4. Mr. Yoshiharu HIGUCHI Project Manager CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. 5. Dr. Tomoyuki KURODA Health Sector Surveyor CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. 6. Mr. Hiroshi MORII Equipment Planner CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. 7. Mr. Haruo ITO Equipment Planner / CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. Cost and Procurement Planner 8. Ms. Rusudan PIRVELI Interpreter CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. (2) Explanation of Draft Report 1. Dr. Yoshiko TSUYUKI Team Leader/ Technical Official, Experts Service Division, Technical Advisor Bureau of International Cooperation International Medical Center of Japan, Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare 2. Mr. Yoshimasa TAKEMURA Project Coordinator Staff, Second Management Division, Grant Aid Management Department (JICA) 3. Mr. Yoshiharu HIGUCHI Project Manager CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. 4. Mr. Hiroshi MORII Equipment Planner CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. 5. Ms. Rusudan PIRVELI Interpreter CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. A-1 Appendix-2 Study Schedule (1) Field Survey No. Date Movement Activities Accommodation 1 Apr. 5 (Sat) Narita→Frankfurt Frankfurt (A) (B) (D) (A) (C) (D) 2 Apr. 6 (Sun) Frankfurt→Baku Baku (A) (C) (D) (A) (C) (D) 3 Apr. 7 (Mon) Baku→A) (C) (D) Visit the Embassy of Japan in Baku Train (A) (C) (D) London→(B) (A) (C) (D) Flight (B) (F) (G) Narita→Vienna→ (F) (G) 4 Apr.
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGIA: True Orthodox Fear Church-Destroyers Will Escape Justice
    FORUM 18 NEWS SERVICE, Oslo, Norway http://www.forum18.org/ The right to believe, to worship and witness The right to change one's belief or religion The right to join together and express one's belief This article was published by F18News on: 7 April 2003 GEORGIA: True Orthodox fear church-destroyers will escape justice By Felix Corley, Forum 18 News Service <http://www.forum18.org> True Orthodox leaders have expressed concern that the apparent closure of the criminal investigation into those guilty of destroying a True Orthodox Church in the village of Shemokmedi in south western Georgia last October will allow them to escape punishment. Deputy procurator Pridon Chanturia ordered the case to be closed on the grounds that "it was impossible to identify the organiser, encourager or perpetrator of the aforementioned criminal act". However, the chief procurator of Ozurgeti district, Yakov Iadolidze, categorically denied to Forum 18 News Service that the investigation has stopped. "The guilty will be prosecuted and there will be a criminal trial." But True Orthodox priest Fr Gela Aroshvili rejected Iadolidze's claim that the case was continuing. "He's lying. If that's so, why did they send us the 18 January decision declaring that the case was being closed?" True Orthodox leaders have expressed concern that the apparent closure of the criminal investigation into those guilty of destroying a newly-built True Orthodox Church in the village of Shemokmedi in south western Georgia last October will allow them to escape punishment. In a decision dated 18 January but which was given to the True Orthodox only in late March, deputy procurator of Ozurgeti region Pridon Chanturia ordered the case to be closed on the grounds that "it was impossible to identify the organiser, encourager or perpetrator of the aforementioned criminal act".
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGIA Handbook on Transparency and Citizen Participation
    GEORGIA Handbook on Transparency and Citizen Participation Council of Europe Original: Handbook on Transparency and Citizen Participation in Georgia (English version) The opinions expressed in this work are the responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Council of Europe. The reproduction of extracts (up to 500 words) is authorised, except for commercial purposes as long as the integrity of the text is preserved, the excerpt is not used out of context, does not provide incomplete information or does not otherwise mislead the reader as to the nature, scope or content of the text. The source text must always be acknowledged as follows All other requests concerning the reproduction/translation of all or part of the document, should be addressed to the Directorate of Communications, Council of Europe (F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex or [email protected]). All other requests concerning this publication should be addressed to the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe. Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe Cover design and layout: RGOLI F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex France © Council of Europe, December 2020 E-mail: [email protected] (2nd edition) Acknowledgements This Handbook on Transparency and Citizen Participation in Georgia was developed by the (2015-2017) in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus. It was implemented as part of the Partnership for Good Governance 2015-2017 between the Council of Europe and the European Union. The research work and writing of this updated edition was carried out by the Institute for Development of Freedom of Information (IDFI), a Georgian non-governmental organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM): Georgia Progress Report 2016- 2017
    Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM): Georgia Progress Report 2016- 2017 Lasha Gogidze, Independent Researcher Tamar Gzirishvili, Independent Researcher Table of Contents Executive Summary: Georgia 3 1. Introduction 15 II. Context 16 III. Leadership and Multistakeholder Process 22 IV. Commitments 29 1. Adapting the Public Service Hall to the needs of people with disabilities 32 2. Launch of the unified healthcare system information portal 35 3. Introduction of electronic licensing system in the field of natural resource application 38 4. Creation of spatial (geographic) data web-portal for the energy sector 41 5. Creation of innovation ecosystem 44 6. Electronic portal for registering and disposal of state property – Customer’s Module 48 7. Development of the Freedom of Information Law 50 8. Development of a monitoring and assessment system of the Government policy and legislative acts 53 ✪ 9. Introduction of the public officials’ asset declarations monitoring system 56 10. Establishing unified regulations to publish court decisions 59 11. Development of transparency and integrity strategy and action plan in the field of regional development and infrastructure 62 12. Improvement of the database of the convicted and transfer of the penitentiary department entirely onto the electronic workflow management 66 13. Publication of phone tapping data according to the nature of the crime and geographic area 69 ✪14. Increasing citizen participation in supervision of public finances (public audit) 72 15. Electronic innovations for more transparency and efficiency of public procurement 77 ✪16. Adoption of the Environmental Assessment Code 81 17. Introduction of a mobile app as an alternative channel to connect to “112” 84 18.
    [Show full text]
  • THE URBAN INSTITUTE 2100 M STREET, NW WASHINGTON, DC 20037 Maria C
    THE URBAN INSTITUTE 2100 M STREET, NW WASHINGTON, DC 20037 Maria C. Andrade-Stern Direct Diat (202) 261 -5396 Senior Contract Administrator FAX: (202) 728-0231 mandradea ui.urban.org July 15,2003 Mr. Gary Kinney Contracting Officer USAlD Caucasus 20 Telavi Street Tbilisi, 380003, Georgia RE: Contract No. EEU-I-00-99-00015-00,TO No. 809 UI Project 06901-012, Georgia Local Governance Reform lnitiative Quarterly Task Order Progress and Cost Report, April to June 2003 Dear Mr. Kinney: Please find the enclosed Quarterly Task Order Progress and Cost Report, April to June 2003, Georgia Local Governance Reform Initiative. This report is required by Sections F.5 and F.6 of our Local Government Assistance lnitiative Indefinite Quantity Contract. Please direct any technical questions to Dr. William E. Krause at [email protected] or (995) 32-22-5868. Questions of a contractual nature should be addressed to me at (202) 261-5396. Sincerely, Maria C. Andrade-Stern Enclosures Joe Taggart (CTO, USAlD Caucasus) Mike Keshishian (USAIDNV) William E. Krause (UIKbilisi) USAlD Development Clearinghouse IAC Deliverables File (06901-01 2) IAC Chron File QUARTERLY TASK ORDER PROGRESS AND COST REPORT APRIL TO JUNE2003 GEORGIA LOCAL GOVERNANCE REFORM INITIATIVE Prepared for Prepared by William E. Krause The Urban Institute Georgia Local Governance Reform Initiative United States Agency for International Development Contract No. EEU-1-99-000 15-00, Task Order No. 809 THE URBAN INSTITUTE 2100 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20037 (202) 833-7200 June 2003 www.urban.org UI Project 0690 1-012 TABLE OF CONTENTS I . HIGHLIGHTS ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Realizing the Urban Potential in Georgia: National Urban Assessment
    REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA National Urban Assessment ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA NATIONAL URBAN ASSESSMENT ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2016 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 632 4444; Fax +63 2 636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2016. Printed in the Philippines. ISBN 978-92-9257-352-2 (Print), 978-92-9257-353-9 (e-ISBN) Publication Stock No. RPT168254 Cataloging-In-Publication Data Asian Development Bank. Realizing the urban potential in Georgia—National urban assessment. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2016. 1. Urban development.2. Georgia.3. National urban assessment, strategy, and road maps. I. Asian Development Bank. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. This publication was finalized in November 2015 and statistical data used was from the National Statistics Office of Georgia as available at the time on http://www.geostat.ge The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
    [Show full text]
  • LEPL Tbilisi State Medical University First University Clinic Tbilisi Gudamakari St
    LEPL Tbilisi State Medical University First University Clinic Tbilisi Gudamakari st. N4 Aversi Clinic Ltd Tbilisi Vazha-Pshavela Ave. N27 b Neolab Ltd Tbilisi Tashkent st. N47 New Hospitals Ltd Tbilisi Krtsanisi st. N12 Medical Center "Cito" Tbilisi Paliashvili st. N40 Molecular Diagnostics Centre Tbilisi Lubliana st. N11 A Megalab Tbilisi Kavtaradze st. N23 Infections Diseases, Aids And Clinical Immunology Research Center Tbilisi Al. Kazbegi st. N16 Med Diagnostics Tbilisi A. Beliashvili N78 National Tuberculosis Center Tbilisi Adjara st. N8, 0101 State Laboratory of Agriculture, Tbilisi Zonal Diagnostic Laboratory (ZDL) Tbilisi V. Godziashvili st. N49 Medical World Diagnostics Ltd Tbilisi Lubliana st. N33 "National Genetics Laboratory" GN-Invest Ltd. Tbilisi David Agmashenebeli Ave. N240 Medi Prime Tbilisi Gabriel Salosi st. N9b5 PCR Diagnostic and Research Laboratory - Prime Lab Tbilisi Bokhua st. N11 Genomics Tbilisi Sulkhan Tsintsadze st. N23 Bacteriophage Analytical Diagnostic Center- Diagnose -90 Tbilisi L. Gotua st. N3 Ultramed Tbilisi Ureki st. N15 Medison Holding Tbilisi Gobronidze st. N27 Medison Holding Tbilisi Vazha-Pshavela Ave. 83/11 Medison Holding Tbilisi Kaloubani st. N12 Evex Clinics - Mtatsminda Polyclinic Tbilisi Vekua st. N3 Ltd. "Medcapital" - 1 Tbilisi D. Gamrekeli st. N19 Ltd. MedCapital - 2 Tbilisi Moscow Ave. 4th sq. 3rd quarter Ltd. "Medcapital" - 3 Tbilisi I. Vekua st. N18 "Tbilisi Adult Polyclinic N19" Ltd Tbilisi Moscow Ave. N23 JSC Evex Clinics - Didube Polyclinic Tbilisi Akaki Tsereteli Ave. N123 JSC Evex Clinics - Varketili Polyclinic Tbilisi Javakheti st. N30 JSC Evex Clinics - Isani Polyclinic Tbilisi Ketvan Tsamebuli Ave. N69 JSC Evex Clinics - Saburtalo Polyclinic Tbilisi Vazha-Pshvela Ave. N40 Tbilisi Sea Hospital Tbilisi Varketili-3 IV m / r, plot 14/430 "St.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Progress Report Georgia Communities
    QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT GEORGIA COMMUNITIES EMPOWERED FOR LOCAL DECISION-MAKING APRIL TO JUNE 2005 Prepared for Prepared by William E. Krause The Urban Institute Georgia Communities Empowered for Local Decision-Making United States Agency for International Development Cooperative Agreement No. 114-A-00-04-00131-00 THE URBAN INSTITUTE 2100 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20037 (202) 833-7200 July 2005 www.urban.org UI Project 07755-000-00 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Highlights ..............................................................................................................................................2 II. Progress of Major Activities...................................................................................................................3 III. Deliverables and Reports....................................................................................................................12 IV. Problems or Delays Affecting Performance ........................................................................................13 V. Work Planned for Next Reporting Period ............................................................................................13 VI. Specific Action Requested ..................................................................................................................15 QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT APRIL TO JUNE 2005 GEORGIA COMMUNITIES EMPOWERED FOR LOCAL DECISION-MAKING Cooperative Agreement No.: 114-A-00-04-00131-00 Date of Issuance: September 23, 2004 Amount Obligated: $5,000,000 Total Potential
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Georgian National Championships
    Georgian National Championships 14-15/06 2019 Year Athletics Arena Tbilisi, Georgia Men Results N Surname, Name DOB City Result 100m 1 Kupunia Luka 2000 Tbilisi 11,29/11,16 2 Butivchenko Giga 1997 Adjara 11,43/11,33 3 Dzodzuashvili Ivane 1998 Tbilisi 11,56/11,43 4 Akhalaia Grigol 1998 Khobi 11,53/DQ 5 Lekishvili Shalva 2001 Akhaltsikhe 11,58/11,54 6 Gulua Luka 2002 Khobi 11,86/11,76 7 Khachaturiani Aleksandre 2002 Tbilisi 12,07/11,91 8 Kharebashvili Giorgi 1998 Tbilisi 11,64 9 Burduli Saba 2004 Tbilisi 12,07 10 Telia Zuka 1998 Tbilisi 12,11 11 Makharadze Mamuka 2003 Ozurgeti 12,25 12 Pirtakhia Temuri 2003 Tbilisi 12,29 13 Mitskevichi Ruslani 2002 Tbilisi 12,46 14 Mardasovi Nikita 2003 Tbilisi 12,47 15 Chaduneli Luka 2003 Borjomi 12,52 16 Partsvania Levani 2002 Tbilisi 12,60 17 Gabelia Levani 2003 Poti 12,61 18 Gvasalia Giga 2003 Poti 12,62 19 Kasumovi Mais 2004 Tbilisi 12,63 20 Tugushi Lasha 2004 Ozurgeti 12,74 21 Kerdikoshvili Ucha 2002 Gori 13,05 22 Ianpolski Gleb 2003 Tbilisi 13,12 23 Tatunashvili Daviti 2003 Borjomi 13,31 24 25 Jangoian Alikhan 2003 Tbilisi 13,33 26 Margvelashvili Giorgi 2003 Tbilisi 13,37 27 Samushia Mikheil 2004 Tsalenjikha 13,56 28 Jgerenaia Luka 2005 Khobi 13,63 29 Omianidze Giorgi 2004 Samtredia 13,74 30 Shekrelidze Jaba 2004 Samtredia 13,99 Georgian National Championships 14-15/06 2019 Year Athletics Arena Tbilisi, Georgia 31 Muradovi Vagani 2003 Tbilisi 14,02 200m 1 Endeladze Mindia 1998 Akhaltsikhe 22,65/22,82 2 Butivchenko Giga 1997 Adjara 23,96/23,71 3 Piakidze Borisi 2003 Kutaisi 23,91/23,80 3 Kharebashvili
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Labour Party – Employment – Electoral Commission – Electoral Fraud – Internal Relocation 22 December 2009
    Country Advice Georgia Georgia – GEO35862 – Georgia Labour Party – Employment – Electoral Commission – Electoral fraud – Internal relocation 22 December 2009 1 Please provide information regarding the current treatment of Georgia Labour Party (GLP) members – both high profile and ordinary members. Are they targeted by the authorities/national government for persecution? Limited information on the treatment of GLP members by the government was found among the sources consulted. However, a number of sources indicate that ‘opposition activists’ more generally have been attacked and detained on various occasions. Attacks on opposition activists The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe/Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights Election Observation Mission report on Georgia’s 21 May 2008 elections identifies “widespread allegations of intimidation…of candidates, party activists and state employees” during the election campaign, several of which were deemed credible. Such intimidation included “pressure on opposition supporters by local officials to desist from campaigning”. It is also reported that “[t]he post- election environment was marred by a series of violent attacks by unknown assailants on opposition activists, which took place daily between 29 May and 2 June”.1 The US Department of State human rights report on Georgia released in February 2009 similarly explains that “[u]nknown assailants attacked members of the political opposition before and after the January 5 presidential and May 18 parliamentary elections…[and that] [u]nknown assailants also physically assaulted opposition figures at other times during the year”. In addition, the report highlights problems experienced by “politically active persons who were not members of the ruling party”, including “selective prosecution for corruption”.2 An article from Eurasia Insight dated 13 August 2009 identifies “a disturbing pattern of arrests, beatings and kidnappings involving opposition members and supporters [which] has developed in Georgia over the past four months”.
    [Show full text]