DOCSLIB.ORG

Highway Noise a Design Guide, for Prediction and Control

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

174 NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM REPORT i74 HIGHWAY NOISE A DESIGN GUIDE, FOR PREDICTION AND CONTROL ( TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 1976 Officers HAROLD L. MICHAEL, Chairman ROBERT N. HUNTER, Vice Chairman W. N. CAREY, JR., Executive Director Executive Committee HENRIK E. STAFSETH, Executive Director, American Assn. of State Highway and Transportation Officials (ex officio) NORBERTT. TIEMANN, Federal Highway Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) ROBERT E. PATRICELLI, Urban Mass Transportation Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) ASAPH H. HALC, Federal Railroad Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation, (ex officio) HARVEY BROOKS, Chairman, Commission on Sociotechnical Systems, National Research Council (ex officio) MILTON PIKARSKY, Chairman of the Board, Chicago Regional Transportation Authority (ex officio, Past Chairman 1975) WARREN E. ALBERTS, Vice President (Systems Operations Services), United Airlines GEORGE H. ANDREWS, Vice President (Transportation Marketing), Sverdrup and Parcel GRANT BASTIAN, State Highway Engineer, Nevada Department of Highways KURT W. BAUER, Executive Director, Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission LANG HORNE M. BOND, Secretary, Illinois Department of Transportation MANUEL CARBALLO, Secretary of Health and Social Services, State ojWisconsin L. S. CRANE, President, Southern Railway System JAMES M. DAVEY; Consultant . B. L. DEBERRY, Engineer-Director, Texas State Department of Highways and Public Transportation LOUIS J. GAMBACCINI, Vice President and General Manager,: Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation HOWARD L. GAUTHIER, Professor of Geography, Ohio State University FRANK C. HERRINGER, General Manager, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District ANN R. HULL, Delegate, Maryland General Assembly ROBERT N. HUNTER, Chief Engineer, Missouri State Highway Department PETER G. KOLTNOW, President, Highway Users Federation for Safety and Mobility A. SCHEFFER LANG, Assistant to the President, Association of American Railroads BENJAMIN LAX, Director, Francis Bitter National Magnet Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology DANIEL McFADDEN, Professor of Economics, University of California HAROLD L. MICHAEL, Professor of Civil Engineering, Purdue U,ilve,üly THOMAS D. MORELAND, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Transportation J. PHILLIP RICHLEY, Vice President (Engineering and Construction), The Cafaro Company RAYMOND T. SCHULER, Commissioner, New York State Department of Transportation WILLIAM K. SMITH, Vice President (Transportation), General Mills NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM Transportation Research Board Executive Co,nmittee Subco,nmittee for the NCHRP HAROLD L. MICHAEL, Purdue University (Chairman) ROBERT N. HUNTER, Missouri State Highway Department HENRIK E. STAFSETH, Amer. Ass,:, of State Hwy. and Transp. Officials NORBERT T. TIEMANN, U.S. Department of Transportation HARVEY BROOKS, National Research Council W. N. CAREY, JR., Transportation Research Board General Field of Traffic Area of Operations and Control Project Panel G3-7 ALGER F. MALO, Traffic Engineering Coniultant (Chairman) WAYNE N. yOLK, Consultant JOHN E. BAERWALD, University of Illinois EUGENE CHEN, Federal Highivay Administration FRED W. HURD, Eno Foundation for Transportation TIMOTHY M. BARRY, Federal Highway Administration HAROLD L. MICHAEL, Purdue University K. E. COOK, Transportation Research Board WILBUR H. SIMONSON, Consultant Program Staff KRIEGER W. HENDERSON, JR., Program Director DAVID K. WITHEFORD, Assistant Program Director HARRY A. SMITH, Projects Engineer LOUIS M. MAcGREGOR, Admi,zistrative Engineer ROBERT E. SPICHER, Projects Engineer JOHN E. BURKE, Projects Engineer (Retired) HERBERT P. ORLAND, Editor R. IAN KINGHAM, Projects Engineer PATRICIA A. PETERS, Associate Editor ROBERT J. REILLY, Projects Engineer EDYTHE T. CRUMP, Assistant Editor NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM REPORT 174 HIGHWAY NOISE A DESIGN GUIDE FOR PREDICTION AND CONTROL B. ANDREW KUGLER, DANIEL E. COMMINS AND WILLIAM J. GALLOWAY, BOLT BERANEK AND NEWMAN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA RESEARCH SPONSORED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS IN COOPERATION WITH THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION AREAS OF INTEREST: HIGHWAY DESIGN ROAD USER CHARACTERISTICS URBAN COMMUNITY VALUES TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL WASHINGTON, D.C. 1976 11 NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM NCHRP Report 174 Systematic, well-designed research provides the most ef- Project 3-7.FY '73 fective approach to the solution of many problems facing ISBN 0-309-02539-7 highway administrators and engineers. Often, highway L. C. Catalog Card No. 76-52798 problems are of local interest and can best be studied by highway departments individually or in cooperation with Price: $9.60 their state universities and others. However, the accelerat- ing growth of highway transportation develops increasingly complex problems of wide interest to highway authorities. These problems are best studied through a coordinated program of cooperative research. In recognition of these needs, the highway administrators Notice of the American Association of State Highway and Trans- The project that is the subject of this report was a part of the portation Officials initiated in 1962 an objective national National Cooperative Highway Research Program conducted by the highway research program employing modern scientific Transportation Research Board with the approval of the Governing Board of the National Research Council, acting in behalf of the techniques. This program is supported on a continuing National Academy of Sciences. Such approval reflects the Governing basis by funds from participating member states of the Board's judgment that the program concerned is of national impor- Association and it receives the full cooperation and support tance and appropriate with respect to both the purposes and re- sources of the National Research Council. of the Federal Highway Administration, United States The members of the technical committee selected to monitor this Department of Transportation. project and to review this report were chosen for recognized scholarly competence and with due consideration for the balance The Transportation Research Board of the National Re- of disciplines appropriate to the project. The opinions and con- search Council was requested by the Association to admin- clusions expressed or implied are those of the research agency that ister the research program because of the Board's recog- performed the research, and, while they have been accepted as appropriate by the technical committee, they are not necessarily those nized objectivity and understanding of modern research of the Transportation Research Board, the National Research Coun- practices. The Board is uniquely suited for this purpose cil, the National Academy of Sciences, or the program sponsors. as: it maintains an extensive committee structure from Each report is reviewed and processed according to procedures established and monitored by the Report Review Committee of the which authorities on any highway transportation subject National Academy of Sciences. Distribution of the report is ap- may be drawn; it possesses avenues of communications and proved by the President of the Academy upon satisfactory comple- tion of the review process. cooperation with federal, state, and local governmental The National Research Council is the principal operating agency of agencies, universities, and industry; its relationship to its the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of parent organization, the National Academy of Sciences, a Engineering, serving government and other organizations. The Transportation Research Board evolved from the 54-year-old High- private, nonprofit institution, is an insurance of objectivity; way Research Board. The TRB incorporates all former HRB it maintains a full-time research correlation staff of special- activities but also performs additional functions under a broader ists in highway transportation matters to bring the findings scope involving all modes of transportation and the interactions of of research directly to those who are in a position to use transportation with society. them. The program is developed on the basis of research needs identified by chief administrators of the highway and trans- portation departments and by committees of AASHTO. Each year, specific areas of research needs to be included in the program are proposed to the Academy and the Board by the American Association of State Highway and Trans- portation Officials. Research projects to fulfill these needs are defined by the Board, and qualified research agencies Published reports of the are selected from those that have submitted proposals. Ad- NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM ministration and surveillance of research contracts are responsibilities of the Academy and its Transportation are available from: Research Board. Transportation Research Board The needs for highway research are many, and the National National Academy of Sciences Cooperative Highway Research Program can make signifi- 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W. cant contributions to the solution of highway transportation Washington, D.C. 20418 problems of mutual concern to many responsible groups. The program, however, is intended to complement rather than to substitute for or duplicate other highway
Recommended publications
  • Hi Quality Version Available on AMIGALAND.COMYOUR BONUS SECOND CD! Packed with Games, Anims, ^ 3D Models and M Ore

    Hi Quality Version Available on AMIGALAND.COMYOUR BONUS SECOND CD! Packed with Games, Anims, ^ 3D Models and M Ore

    ' A G A EXPERIENCE Hi Quality Version Available on AMIGALAND.COMYOUR BONUS SECOND CD! Packed with games, anims, ^ 3D models and m ore... P L U S n @ AMIGA • J U T D J t 'jJUhD'j'jSxni D W This commercial CD is packed with AGA games, 9771363006008 ^ demos, pictures, utilities, 3D models, music, animations and more 9 771363 006008 Please make checks to COSOFT or O (01702) 300441 n 300441 order by credit card / switch & delta Most titles are despatched same day. ^ ^ - 5 217 - 219 Hamstel Rd - Southend-on-Sea, ESSEX, SS2 4LB Vat is INCLUDED on all titles, e&oe q . ^ er [email protected] Give us your email for monthly feb Page: Hnp://www.pdsoft m updated catalogue reports. Office & Retail Outlet open Monday to Saturday 9:30 to 7pm - Tel (01702) 306060 & 306061 - Fax (01702) 300115 Please add 1.00 per title for UK P&P & 2.00 for oversea's Airmail - Order via email & get the most upto date prices. Check our Web pages (updated every day) for special ofers and new releases. Special offers running every day. JUNGLE STRIKE SPECIAL FEATURE (1 4 .ff CAPTIAL PUNISHMENT Only (24.99 688 ATTACK SUPER SIOMARKS LEGENDS LURE OF THE SUB (12 DATA DISK (S B * f 17.BB T.TRESS (12 SABRE TEAM PLAYER ON MANAGER 2 OOYSSEY 1199 RUGBY SYNDICATE ( 12.M EURO KICKOFF 3 Hi Quality Version Available on AMIGALAND.COMC7.BB INTER OFFICE UPNtl BLACK CRYPT M r ( I f f * Me (11.00 INTER SPREAD WORLD CUP M r ( 9 99 Inc SOCCER CM2 - (3.99 A ll - (3 99 IN TER WORD K240 (7.U M r u n w CHESS SYSTEM SCREEHBAT 4 Give us a ring if you do not see what you want ACTIVE STEREO Some titles are limited and will go out of stock quickly.
  • FHWA Noise Compatible Land Use Curriculum

    FHWA Noise Compatible Land Use Curriculum

    FHWA Noise Compatible Land Use Curriculum Lesson 1: Discussion of Roadway Noise and FHWA Guidelines Lesson 2: Essential Elements of Noise Compatible Land Use Planning Lesson 3: Noise Compatible Reduction Techniques – Physical Responses Lesson 4: Noise Compatible Reduction Techniques – Policy and Administrative Strategies ♦ PREPARED FOR THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION BY THE CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATION TRAINING AND RESEARCH TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY ♦ November 2006 Contents Curriculum Design, Overview, and Sources for Additional Information Lesson 1: Discussion of Roadway Noise and FHWA Guidelines Lesson 2: Essential Elements of Noise Compatible Land Use Planning Lesson 3: Noise Compatible Reduction Techniques – Physical Responses Lesson 4: Noise Compatible Reduction Techniques – Policies and Administrative Strategies 2 Curriculum Design The 4-part curriculum is structured to be taught in sessions of 90 minutes each. It is expected that the instructor will utilize this information as a foundation and will supplement the core information with specific local examples and additional detail. If one of the companion workshop videos is chosen to supplement the material in any lesson, adjust the length of discussion for the remaining material. It is envisioned that the curriculum could be part of a two-week module for a college level course or a one day seminar. Overview Appropriately accommodating highway noise is a critical component of project planning and implementation for engineers across the nation. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) prescribes a three-part approach for addressing roadway noise including: 1) source controls and quiet vehicles, 2) reduction measures within highway construction, and 3) developing land adjacent to highways in a way that is compatible with highway noise.
  • Vectorconnection-German.Pdf

    Vectorconnection-German.Pdf

    - 1 - VECTOR Connection Multi I/O-Karte Zusätzliche serielle und parallele Schnittstellen für Commodore Amiga 2000,3000,4000 Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Das Platinenlayout, die PAL/GAL-Listings, die Soft- ware in den Eproms, Proms und auf Diskette, das VECTOR-Logo und dieses Handbuch unterliegen dem Urheberrechtsschutz. Kein Teil dieser Anleitung, der Programme, der Schaltung oder des Layouts darf ohne unsere ausdrückliche schriftliche Genehmigung in irgendeiner Form reproduziert, vervielfältigt oder verarbeitet werden. Zuwiderhandlungen werden straf- und zivilrechtlich ver- folgt. Wir behalten uns vor, ohne weitere Ankündigung Änderungen der Hardware, der Software und der Anleitung vorzunehmen. Alle verwendeten Markenzeichen und -namen sind eingetragene Warenzeichen ihrer jeweiligen Inhaber. Copyright HK-Computer GmbH (C)1992/93 - 2 - Inhaltsverzeichnis: I. Allgemeines 3 II. Einbauanleitung 3 II.1 Zusätzliche Abschlußbleche 3 II.2 Anschlüsse Seriell 4 II.3 Anschlüsse Parallel 4 II.4 Einstecken der Schnittstellenkarte 4 III Installation der Software 4 III.1.1 Seriell 4 III.1.2 Parallel 4 III.2 Installation bei mehreren Karten im System 5 III.3 De-Installation der Software 5 IV Das serielle Device 6 IV.1 hkduart.device 6 IV.2 Der Preferences-Mechanismus 6 IV.3 HKDprefs 6 IV.3.1 Verhalten von HKDprefs unter Amiga DOS1.3 7 IV.3.2 Format der Steuerfiles unter Amiga DOS1.3 7 IV.3.3 Verhalten von HKDprefs unter AmigaOS 2.0 9 IV.4 Das Duart-Preferences Programm unter OS 2.0 9 IV.5 Die DOS-Handler 9 IV.5.l hkduart-handler 10 IV.5.2 hkduart-aux-handler 10 V Das parallele Device 11 V.l pio.
  • Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment

    Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment

    TRANSIT NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT FTA-VA-90-1003-06 May 2006 Office of Planning and Environment Federal Transit Administration Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED May 2006 Final Report 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment 6. AUTHOR(S) Carl E. Hanson, David A. Towers, and Lance D. Meister 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Harris Miller Miller & Hanson Inc. REPORT NUMBER 77 South Bedford Street 299600 Burlington, MA 01803 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING U.S. Department of Transportation AGENCY REPORT NUMBER Federal Transit Administration Office of Planning and Environment FTA-VA-90-1003-06 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Contract management and final production performed by: Frank Spielberg and Kristine Wickham Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. 8300 Boone Blvd., Suite 700 Vienna, VA 22182 12a.
  • Highway Noise a Design Guide for Highway Engineers

    Highway Noise a Design Guide for Highway Engineers

    NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PRO6RAM REPORT 117 HIGHWAY NOISE A DESIGN GUIDE FOR HIGHWAY ENGINEERS HIGHWAY RESEARCH BOARD NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES -NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING HIGHWAY RESEARCH BOARD 1971 Officers CHARLES E. SHUMATE, Chairman ALAN M. VOORHEES, First Vice Chairman WILLIAM L. GARRISON, Second Vice Chairman W. N. CAREY, JR., Executive Director Executive Committee F. C. TURNER, Federal Highway Administrator, U. S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) A. E. JOHNSON, Executive Director, American Association of State Highway Officials (ex officio) ERNST WEBER, Chairman, Division of Engineering, National Research Council (ex officio) OSCAR T. MARZKE, Vice President, Fundamental Research, U. S. Steel Corporation (ex officio, Past Chairman, 1969) D. GRANT MICKLE, President, Highway Users Federation for Safety and Mobility (ex officio, Past Chairman, 1970) CHARLES A. BLESSING, Director, Detroit City Planning Commission HENDRIK W. BODE, Professor of Systems Engineering, Harvard University JAY W. BROWN, Director of Road Operations, Florida Department of Transportation W. J. BURMEISTER, State Highway Engineer, Wisconsin Department of Transportation HOWARD A. COLEMAN, Consultant, Missouri Portland Cement Company HARMER E. DAVIS, Director, Institute of Transportation and Traffic Engineering, University of California WILLIAM L. GARRISON, Professor of Environmental Engineering, University of Pittsburgh GEORGE E. HOLBROOK, E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company EUGENE M. JOHNSON, President, The Asphalt Institute A. SCHEFFER LANG, Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology JOHN A. LEGARRA, State Highway Engineer and Chief of Division, California Division of Highways WILLIAM A. McCONNELL, Director, Operations Office, Engineering Staff, Ford Motor Company JOHN J. McKETTA, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Texas J.
  • Saku #44 (3/2003) 7. Joulukuuta 2003 - 11

    Saku #44 (3/2003) 7. Joulukuuta 2003 - 11

    Saku #44 (3/2003) 7. joulukuuta 2003 - 11. vuosikerta Anu Seilonen Päätoimittaja Vuosikokous 2003 Ensimmäistä kertaa Suomessa AmigaOS 4 Beta kokousvieraiden käpisteltävänä. AmigaOne-XE G4@800 MHz Ensitestissä uuden sukupolven Amiga siitä järeämmästä päästä. Lue ensivaikutelmista! Pegasos/RJ Mical -tilaisuus Amigan Intuitionin isä piipahti Suomessa Pegasos- esittelyssä. Anu Seilonen Vuosikokous 2003 Yhdistyksen vuosikokous 2003 Riihimäen vuosikokouksessa oli esittelyssä mm. Pegasos sekä ensimmäistä kertaa Suomessa uuden Posti AmigaOS4:n betaversio. RJ Mical käväisi Helsingissä Amigan Intuitionin isä RJ Mical piipahti Helsingissä Joanna Kurki yhdistyksen ja Genesin järjestämässä Pegasos- esittelyssä. Pegasos/RJ Mical -tilaisuus Joni Halme Uutiset Päivitykset AmigaOne-XE G4@800 MHz AmigaOne-XE G4@800 MHz Kuinka hyrähtää käyntiin nopeamman sarjan Joni Halme AmigaOne? Lue ensitesti! MorphOS 1.4 Pegasoksessa MorphOS 1.4 Pegasoksessa "Tavallisen käyttäjän näkökulmasta MorphOS:n vakaus ja käyttökelpoisuus ovat parantuneet merkittävästi Kelly Samel (suom. Janne Peräaho) 1.4-julkaisun myötä." Nepalla nettiin - RR-Net "Jokaisen naavapartaisen retroilijan haaveissa on Pegasos G3@600 MHz varmaan joskus pilkahtanut ajatus Wanhan Sotaratsun kytkemisestä loputtoman tiedon lähteille." Ilkka Lehtoranta Club 3D Radeon 7000 DVI Tuomo Mämmelä Nepalla nettiin - RR-Net Petri A. Räty Tämä voisi olla juuri SINUN juttusi Eikö kukaan enää pelaa? Pelijutut ovat kokeneet massiivisen inflaation. Onko Avusta Sakua ja lukijoita, kirjoita! pelitarjonta näin olematonta,
  • Minimum Sound Requirements for Hybrid and Electric Vehicles

    Minimum Sound Requirements for Hybrid and Electric Vehicles

    DOT HS 812 347 November 2016 Minimum Sound Requirements for Hybrid And Electric Vehicles Final Environmental Assessment Suggested APA Format Citation: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2016, November). Minimum sound requirements for hybrid and electric vehicles: Final environmental assessment (Document submitted to Docket Number NHTSA-2011-0100. Report No. DOT HS 812 347). Washington, DC: Author. Minimum Sound Requirements for Hybrid and Electric Vehicles Final Environmental Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................... v LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................... vi GLOSSARY OF SELECTED TERMS ...................................................................................................... vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... xi 1 PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION ........................................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background .....................................................................................................................
  • Minimum Sound Requirements for Hybrid and Electric Vehicles FMVSS 141

    Minimum Sound Requirements for Hybrid and Electric Vehicles FMVSS 141

    Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis Minimum Sound Requirements for Hybrid and Electric Vehicles FMVSS 141 Office of Regulatory Analysis and Evaluation National Center for Statistics and Analysis January 2013 Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... i System Effectiveness ...................................................................................................... ii Costs ............................................................................................................................... ii Benefits .......................................................................................................................... iii Net Impact [Pedestrians and Pedalcyclists Combined] ................................................. iv Cost Effectiveness ......................................................................................................... iv I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 II. Research and Proposal ............................................................................................................. 4 NHTSA’s Proposal ....................................................................................................... 17 III. Alternatives ........................................................................................................................... 24 Requiring
  • Chapter 18 Noise Guide

    Chapter 18 Noise Guide

    April 2017 Noise Guide CHAPTER 18 NOISE GUIDE 18.0 INTRODUCTION The problem of noise generated by highway traffic involves physical, physiological, and psychological factors that cause varying reactions by the public. Highway traffic noise should be considered in the location and design of roadways. This chapter is intended to help designers identify issues related to highway traffic noise, understand the applicable federal and state regulations and guidelines, analyze traffic noise for specific projects, and select and implement noise mitigation measures. From a project's inception, noise mitigation measures may need to be considered as a part of the project. As early in the process as possible, consult the appropriate environmental documentation, if available, to determine if mitigation commitments were made. Contact the Region Environmental Staff for assistance with these determinations and the appropriate regulatory requirements. This chapter contains a summary of basic concepts and supplements existing published material. If more detail is needed concerning any of the following specific subjects, consult the references provided at the end of this chapter. If existing regulation or guidance is revised, or if additional regulation or guidance is published after the date this chapter was published, the new material takes precedence. 18.1 NOISE FUNDAMENTALS Noise is defined as unwanted or excessive sound. Sound (or noise) levels are measured in units of decibels (dB), which are measured on a logarithmic scale which condenses a large range of several magnitudes of sound pressure levels. For the purposes of highway traffic, an “A-scale” weighting is applied to noise levels because the human ear does not perceive all sound frequencies equally.
  • Design Guide for Highway Noise Barriers (0-1471-4)

    Design Guide for Highway Noise Barriers (0-1471-4)

    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-04/0-1471-4 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Design Guide for Highway Noise Barriers May 2002 Revised November 2003 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Richard E. Klingner, Michael T. McNerney, and Research Report 0-1471-4 Ilene Busch-Vishniac 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research 11. Contract or Grant No. The University of Texas at Austin Research Project 0-1471 3208 Red River, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78705-2650 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Research Report Research and Technology Implementation Office P.O. Box 5080 Austin, TX 78763-5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Project conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration, and the Texas Department of Transportation. 16. Abstract The current TxDOT design process for highway noise barriers is reviewed. Design requirements for highway noise barriers are then presented. These include acoustical requirements, structural requirements, safety requirements, aesthetic requirements, and cost considerations. Examples are given of different highway noise barriers used in Texas. Sample plans and specifications are presented. Design requirements are broadly grouped into acoustical requirements, environmental requirements, traffic safety requirements, and structural requirements; those requirements are again presented, drawing on the material presented in the preceding chapters. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement acoustics, aesthetics, design, noise barriers No restrictions.
  • MDOT SHA Sound Barrier Policy

    MDOT SHA Sound Barrier Policy

    HIGHWAY NOISE ABATEMENT PLANNING AND ENGINEERING GUIDELINES FINAL April 16, 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MDOT SHA HIGHWAY NOISE ABATEMENT PLANNING AND ENGINEERING GUIDELINES – April 16, 2020 The Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT) Noise Policy (2020) consists of a brief policy statement, applicable to all of the MDOT Transportation Business Units. This document, the Maryland Department of Transportation State Highway Administration (MDOT SHA) Highway Noise Abatement Planning and Engineering Guidelines (2020), explains how to correctly apply the policy for highway projects. The purpose of this Executive Summary is to highlight some of the key elements found in the guidelines. The 2020 Guidelines are based upon the provisions contained in Title 23 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 772 (23 CFR 772)1 and replace the 2011 MDOT SHA Highway Noise Policy and Highway Noise Policy Implementation Guidelines. For a given Type I project, the adjacent land uses are divided into one of seven possible Activity Categories, which are either noise sensitive (A through E) or not noise sensitive (F and G). Each noise sensitive category has a corresponding Noise Abatement Criteria (NAC) defined in 23 CFR 772 and MDOT SHA’s impact criteria is set 1 dB(A) less than the NAC, consistent with federal regulations. Category B covers exterior impacts for residential areas and has an impact level of 66 dB(A). Highway traffic noise impacts are identified for the affected noise sensitive land use when the subject Type I project will either result in noise levels that approach or exceed the applicable NAC, or result in an increase of 10 dB(A) or more (‘substantial increase’) over existing levels.
  • 1200 S / 1200 P

    1200 S / 1200 P

    1200 S / 1200 P deutsch / englisch Introduction Thank you very much for purchasing the IOBlix . Developing the IOBlix (say: I-O-B-lix) we put much value to high compatibility. Being an interface card the IOBlix is the connection between the Amiga and the peripheral devices. This means - High compatibility with all peripheral devices - High compatibility with all common software that uses the ports When using the IOBlix please remember that there are programms which address the ports low level to use the special feature of the internal Amiga ports. Programms like this are non system conform and cannot operate with the IOBlix. If you have any further questions which are not explained in this manual or in the manuals on the install disk feel free to contact our service hotline: Mo.-Do. 5.00-6.00 p.m. at +49 5651 8097 21. Software Updates for the IOBlix will be available on our web site at http://www.rbm.de. Our E-Mail is [email protected]. Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) / CE Electromagnetic compatibility is supposed to guarantee the „compatibility“ of different electronic devices. This means that your computer must not interfere with your neighbours radio. Transferring your Amiga into a tower case is not clearly defined according to the EMC. For example older ZorroII-Cards do not have the CE-sign so they were never checked for EMC. Anyway does the combination of products with a CE-sign not imply the EMC of the whole product. We emphasize that rebuilding your Computer into a new case and adding any components, you become the manufacturer/producer of this system under the law of EMC.