DOCSLIB.ORG

The State of Democracy in Zambia the State of Democracy in Zambia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The state of democracy in Zambia The state of democracy in Zambia Authors McDonald Chipenzi Laurent C W Kaela Clever Madimutsa Jotham C Momba Hope Mubanga Nchimunya Muleya Charity Musamba Copyright © The Foundation for Democratic Process (FODEP) and the University of Zambia Political and Administrative Studies (UNZA-PAS), 2011 All electronic version of this report shall be licensed under a Creative Commons Licence (CCL)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/. The licence will allow others to copy, distribute or display the report, provided they do so for non- commercial purposes and give proper credit to sources, and distribute derivative work only under the licence identical to the CCL adopted. This licence applies worldwide and is not revocable First published in 2011 by FODEP & UNZA-PAS 284-B Omelo Mumba Road, Rhodes Park P O Box 32379 P O Box 32387 Lusaka, Zambia Edited by Chris Chirwa Cover design by Robert C Chaponda Printed in Zambia by Pro Print Limited Acknowledgments This report is a product of an assessment of the quality of democracy conducted on the basis of International IDEA's State of Democracy Assessment Framework. The report was developed by The Foundation for Democratic Process (FODEP) and the University of Zambia (UNZA) with the support and partnership of International IDEA. International IDEA has not participated in the content development nor the research leading to the report. Views expressed in this report do not necessarily represent the views of International IDEA, its Board or its Council of Advisors. Special acknowledgment is due to International IDEA for technical and financial assistance without which this project would have not been possible. Special mention is due to Ms. Keboitse Machangana, Head of the State of Democracy Programme and Ms Matshidiso Kgothatso Semela-Serote, Senior Programme Officer- Democracy and Governance - International IDEA for their encouragement and comments on drafts of the report. We express appreciation to the UNZA Vice-Chancellor Prof Stephen Simukanga and the FODEP Board of Directors unreservedly endorsing the project. We are indebted to members of the research team drawn from FODEP and UNZA-PAS for their tireless efforts and dedication to work which made this report possible. Our appreciation also goes to members of the Local Reference Group for their guidance and comments on drafts of the report. We also express appreciation to government officials, members of civil society organizations and other stakeholders who participated in Focus Group Discussions and interviews and to the FODEP members and others who served as Local Organizers for project activities in the five (5) provinces of Zambia that were covered in this report. Dr. Laurent C. W. Kaela, Lecturer-UNZA (SOD Project Research Coordinator) Mr. McDonald Chipenzi, Executive Director-FODEP (SOD Project Dissemination Coordinator) Table of Contents Acknowledgements i Table of Contents iii List of Tables iv List of Figures iv Abbreviations and Acronyms v Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Objectives of the Assessment 3 1.3 Methodology 3 1.4 Rationale of the Assessment 3 Chapter 2: Citizenship, Law and Rights 4 2.1 Nationhood and Citizenship 4 2.2 Rule of Law and Access to Justice 11 2.3 Civil and Political Rights in Zambia 16 2.4 Economic and Social Rights 22 Chapter 3: Representative and Accountable Government 25 3.1 Free and Fair Elections 25 3.2 The Democratic Role of Political Parties 29 3.3 Effective and Responsive Government 33 3.4 The Democratic Effectiveness of Parliament 40 3.5 Integrity in Public Life 47 Chapter 4: Civil Society and Popular Participation 54 4.1 The Media in a Democratic Society 54 4.2 Political Participation 65 4.3 Decentralisation 76 Chapter 5: Democracy Beyond the State 85 5.1 External Influences on the Country's Democracy 85 Chapter 6: Summary and Recommendations 93 6.1 Objectives and Approach of the Study 93 6.2 Assessment Framework 93 6.3 Key Findings 93 6.4 Recommendations 96 Annexes Annex A: Description of Methodology 100 Annex B: Membership of the National Constitutional Conference 103 Annex C: Household Questionnaire 104 Annex D: Key Informant Interview Schedule 108 List of Tables Table 2.1 Households' Responses on Extent of Justice Received from Police and Courts of Law 12 Table 2.2 Effectiveness of the Protection of Freedoms: Households' Responses 20 Table 2.3 Household's Responses on whether or not they feel safe from harm by other people 21 Table 3.1 Households' Responses on belonging to a Political Party 32 Table 3.2 Households' Responses on belonging to a Political Party by Sex and Province 33 Table 3.3 Accessibility of Public Services in Zambia by Sex 37 Table 3.4 Accessibility of Public Services in Zambia by Residential Area 38 Table 3.5 Accessibility of Public Services in Zambia by Age Group 38 Table 3.6 Frequency of Consultation by MP or Parliamentary Office concerning their work in Zambia by Sex 45 Table 3.7 of Consultation by MP or Parliamentary Office concerning their work in Zambia by Age 45 Table 3.8 Corruption in Zambia, 2002 to 2010 49 Table 4.1 Households' Responses on Independence of the Media in Zambia 63 Table 4.2 Households' Responses on Effectiveness of the Media in Investigating Government in Zambia 64 Table 4.3 Extent of Private Citizens' Freedom from Intrusion and Harassment by the Media 64 Table 4.4 2006 Local Government Election Results for Selected Constituencies in Zambia 80 Table 4.5 Residential Area by Extent of Local Councils' Cooperation with Local Communities and other Stakeholders in the Formation of Policy 82 Table 4.6 Gender by Extent of Local Councils' Cooperation with Local Communities and other Stakeholders in Service Provision 83 List of Figures Figure 2.1 Practices that people are not free to engage in 8 Figure 2.2 Marginalized and Vulnerable Social Groups that have Received the Least Protection 9 Figure 3.1 ACC's Lack of Effectiveness in Dealing with Corruption by Public Officials: Responses by Province 50 Figure 3.2 Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Measures for Members of the Public 51 Figure 3.3 Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Measures for Public Officials 51 Abbreviations and Acronyms ACC Anti-Corruption Commission AIDS Acquired Immuno-deficiency Syndrome APRM African Peer Review Mechanism CCC Committee for Clean Campaign CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women CPI Corruption Perception Index CSO Central Statistical Office CSO Civil Society Organization CSPR Civil Society for Poverty Reduction DEC Drug Enforcement Commission ECZ Electoral Commission of Zambia EU European Union FBO Faith-based Organization FDD Forum for Democracy and Development FDI Foreign Direct Investment FG Focus Group FGD Focus Group Discussion FODEP Foundation for Democratic Process FPTP First Past the Post GRZ Government of the Republic of Zambia HIPC Highly Indebted Poor Country HIV Human Immuno-deficiency Virus IBA Independent Broadcasting Authority ICESCR International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights IDEA International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance I-PRSP Interim Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper JASZ Joint Assistance Strategy for Zambia MDGs Millennium Development Goals MECOZ Media Ethics Council of Zambia MISA Media Institute of Southern Africa MMD Movement for Multi-Party Democracy NCC National Constitutional Conference NEC National Executive Committee NGO Non-Governmental Organization NGOCC Non-Governmental Organization Coordinating Council NWLG National Women's Lobby Group OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development PAC Public Accounts Committee PACRA Patents and Companies Registration Agency PF Patriotic Front PRSP Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper SACU Southern Africa Customs Union SADC Southern Africa Development Community SDA Seventh Day Adventist UDHR Universal Declaration of Human Rights UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNIP United National Independence Party UNZA University of Zambia UPND United Party for National Development ZAMEC Zambia Media Council ZANIS Zambia News and Information Services ZCSD Zambia Council for Social Development ZCTU Zambia Congress of Trade Unions ZNBC Zambia National Broadcasting Corporation Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Background Zambia became renowned for its peaceful transition from one party to multi-party democracy when in 1991 it replaced a sitting president through peaceful elections three years before the end of his term of office. This was part of a general trend in Africa which began in the late 1980s and saw many African one-party regimes replaced by multi-party democracies following political changes in Europe, including the end of the Cold War. Although formally, Zambia has been a multi-party democracy, it was virtually a one-party state for two decades from 1991 to 2011 as the ruling Movement for Multi-Party Democracy (MMD) remained in power. The MMD is a political party that was formed by an amalgamation of organizations, which included civil society organizations, student groups, trade unions, church organizations and other interest groups of the same name that championed the return to multi-party democracy. Zambia was a multi-party democracy from October 1964 to December 1972 when a one- party state constitution was introduced, but this ended in 1990. Since the re-introduction of the multiparty system, many civil society organizations were not affiliated to the ruling party. However, they have continued to play a watchdog role vis-à-vis the party and the government. Since coming
Recommended publications
  • Zambia Page 1 of 16

    Zambia Page 1 of 16

    Zambia Page 1 of 16 Zambia Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2002 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 31, 2003 Zambia is a republic governed by a president and a unicameral national assembly. Since 1991 generally free and fair multiparty elections have resulted in the victory of the Movement for Multi -Party Democracy (MMD). In December 2001, Levy Mwanawasa of the MMD was elected president, and his party won 69 out of 150 elected seats in the National Assembly. The MMD's use of government resources during the campaign raised questions over the fairness of the elections. Although noting general transparency during the voting, domestic and international observer groups cited irregularities in the registration process and problems in the tabulation of the election results. Opposition parties challenged the election result in court, and court proceedings remained ongoing at year's end. The Constitution mandates an independent judiciary, and the Government generally respected this provision; however, the judicial system was hampered by lack of resources, inefficiency, and reports of possible corruption. The police, divided into regular and paramilitary units operated under the Ministry of Home Affairs, had primary responsibility for maintaining law and order. The Zambia Security and Intelligence Service (ZSIS), under the Office of the President, was responsible for intelligence and internal security. Members of the security forces committed numerous, and at times serious, human rights abuses. Approximately 60 percent of the labor force worked in agriculture, although agriculture contributed only 22 percent to the gross domestic product. Economic growth slowed to 3 percent for the year, partly as a result of drought in some agricultural areas.
  • Zambia's Independence

    Zambia's Independence

    Zambia’s Independence In thy cozy loamy soils deeply flowed mine young blood/ In thy sun- scotched patches birth-ed thee a patriotic lad/ How this thought of hilarity mine psyche partly flood/ Thy progeny in hope mine entrails thou maketh glad/ Thy black visage daily mine heart gladly beholdeth/ For thine good, whence mine desire dryly flourisheth/ Oh Zambia, kind Mother to me thou may be more/ Oh land, thy toil, the oil that boileth our common soul! BRIEF INTRODUCTION In this chapter, the author relives the memories of Zambia’s 19th independence celebrations as a child at Mibenge Primary School in Mibenge’s village in Samfya- Mansa district of Luapula Province. It introduces the major theme of independence, the founding fathers of the independent Republic of Zambia, and the promise of a prosperous, democratic and free nation. MAJOR THEME: Independence ≈ History ≈ Politics ≈ §1.1 Mibenge was born on the ninth Christmas after Zambia became independent. My mother told me that she almost named me Mary had I been a girl, but for the second born who was already called by that name in the family. I was born Charles Chushi Zachariah Mwewa to Zachariah I 1 Kalubeya Mwewa and Justina Kunda of Mibenge village in Samfya-Mansa district in the Luapula Province of Zambia.2 I am positioned seventh in an eight-member family of only two girls: John Mwewa, Mary Kalaba, Gilbert Ng’andwe, George (also called Charles Chibwe), Joseph Ng’andwe, Jeremiah Chushi, and Anne Mwewa. When I was born, it was perhaps not a family secret that I was unexpected.
  • Occurrence of Cholera in Lukanga Fishing Camp, Kapiri-Mposhi District, Zambia

    Occurrence of Cholera in Lukanga Fishing Camp, Kapiri-Mposhi District, Zambia

    OUTBREAK REPORT Occurrence of cholera in Lukanga fishing camp, Kapiri-mposhi district, Zambia R Murebwa-Chirambo1, R Mwanza2, C Mwinuna3, ML Mazaba1, I Mweene-Ndumba1, J Mufunda1 1. World Health Organization, Country office, Lusaka, Zambia 2. Ministry of Health, Provincial Health Office, Kabwe, Zambia 3. Ministry of Health, District Health Office, Kapiri Mposhi, Zambia Correspondence: Rufaro Murembwa-Chirambo ([email protected]) Citation style for this article: Murebwa-Chirambo R, Mwanza R, Mwinuna C, Mazaba ML, Mweene-Ndumba I, Mufunda J. Occurrence of cholera in Lukanga fishing camp, Kapiri-mposhi district, Zambia. Health Press Zambia Bull. 2017;1(1) [Inclusive page numbers] Most of the cholera outbreaks in Zambia have been There is need to employ interventions in the area of recorded from fishing camps and peri-urban areas of water and sanitation on the Lukanga swamps in order the Copperbelt, Luapula and Lusaka provinces. to address the annual cholera outbreaks. Cholera cases have been recorded every year in the Lukanga fishing camps in the last five years. This article Introduction documents a cholera outbreak reported at the Lukanga The first outbreak of cholera in Zambia was fishing camp in Kapiri Mposhi district in September, 2016. All cases that met the cholera case definition as reported in 1977/1978, then cases appeared prescribed in the Integrated Diseases Surveillance and again in 1982/1983. The first major outbreak Response guidelines were admitted and treated using occurred in 1990 and lasted until 1993. Since WHO standard protocols. A total of 27 patients all adult except 1, 26 of whom were male were seen at the cholera then, cholera cases were registered every treatment center.
  • AC Vol 43 No 9

    AC Vol 43 No 9

    www.africa-confidential.com 3 May 2002 Vol 43 No 9 AFRICA CONFIDENTIAL NIGERIA II 2 NIGERIA I Khaki blues, business suits The generals’ election The military has helped tear the country apart but civilians still defer There are worries whether President Obasanjo’s army can to the soldiers and politicians hold together against growing It is a measure of Nigeria’s political class that in next year’s presidential election, the two most likely communal and religious clashes candidates – Olusegun Obasanjo and Muhammadu Buhari – are retired generals and former military ahead of next year’s polls. And, if leaders. And Nigeria’s wealthiest and most influential kingmaker, another retired general and military it does, its senior officers may want leader, Ibrahim Babangida, may well offer money to both sides. On 25 April, General Obasanjo, to take back power again. ‘persuaded’ by his supporters, declared he would seek a second term; on the same day, Gen. Buhari joined the biggest opposition group, the All People’s Party, on whose ticket he may stand for President. LIBERIA 3 Buhari and Obasanjo hold strong and contrary religious convictions: Obasanjo is a ‘born again’ Christian who has preached at the fundamentalist Winners’ Chapel; Buhari exudes asceticism, publicly Rebels without a plan supporting the extension of the Sharia criminal code (AC Vol 42 No 17). Obasanjo is Yoruba from Ogun Rebels threaten President Taylor State in the south-west; Buhari is Fulani from Katsina in the far north. and give him a pretext to ban Over this looming battle lurks the ghost of a late military leader, Gen.
  • The Plundering of Zambian Resources by Frederick

    The Plundering of Zambian Resources by Frederick

    The plundering of Zambian resources by Frederick Chiluba and his friends: a case study of the interaction between national politics and the international drive towards good governance Donge, J.K.van Citation Donge, J. Kvan. (2009). The plundering of Zambian resources by Frederick Chiluba and his friends: a case study of the interaction between national politics and the international drive towards good governance. African Affairs, 108(430), 69-90. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/14510 Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown) License: Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/14510 Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable). African Affairs, 108/430, 69–90 doi: 10.1093/afraf/adn073 C The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal African Society. All rights reserved THE PLUNDERING OF ZAMBIAN RESOURCES BY FREDERICK CHILUBA AND HIS FRIENDS: A CASE STUDY OF THE INTERACTION BETWEEN NATIONAL POLITICS AND THE INTERNATIONAL DRIVE TOWARDS GOOD GOVERNANCE JAN KEES VAN DONGE ABSTRACT This article analyses the accusations that have emerged since 2001 of predatory behaviour during the presidency of Frederick T. Chiluba (1991– 2001). It advocates a detailed analysis of the practices that have come to light in order to move beyond a generalized interpretation of the persis- tence of predatory elites in Africa. Three specific themes appear. First, there is a danger of oversimplification of these conflicts as between the international community and national governments. The political struggles tend to be more complicated than generally presented, and international involvement meshes with local political struggles. Second, predatory be- haviour or corruption is a social process that is embedded in wider national and international networks.
  • Registered Voters by Gender and Constituency

    Registered Voters by Gender and Constituency

    REGISTERED VOTERS BY GENDER AND CONSTITUENCY % OF % OF SUB % OF PROVINCIAL CONSTITUENCY NAME MALES MALES FEMALES FEMALES TOTAL TOTAL KATUBA 25,040 46.6% 28,746 53.4% 53,786 8.1% KEEMBE 23,580 48.1% 25,453 51.9% 49,033 7.4% CHISAMBA 19,289 47.5% 21,343 52.5% 40,632 6.1% CHITAMBO 11,720 44.1% 14,879 55.9% 26,599 4.0% ITEZH-ITEZHI 18,713 47.2% 20,928 52.8% 39,641 5.9% BWACHA 24,749 48.1% 26,707 51.9% 51,456 7.7% KABWE CENTRAL 31,504 47.4% 34,993 52.6% 66,497 10.0% KAPIRI MPOSHI 41,947 46.7% 47,905 53.3% 89,852 13.5% MKUSHI SOUTH 10,797 47.3% 12,017 52.7% 22,814 3.4% MKUSHI NORTH 26,983 49.5% 27,504 50.5% 54,487 8.2% MUMBWA 23,494 47.9% 25,545 52.1% 49,039 7.4% NANGOMA 12,487 47.4% 13,864 52.6% 26,351 4.0% LUFUBU 5,491 48.1% 5,920 51.9% 11,411 1.7% MUCHINGA 10,072 49.7% 10,200 50.3% 20,272 3.0% SERENJE 14,415 48.5% 15,313 51.5% 29,728 4.5% MWEMBEZHI 16,756 47.9% 18,246 52.1% 35,002 5.3% 317,037 47.6% 349,563 52.4% 666,600 100.0% % OF % OF SUB % OF PROVINCIAL CONSTITUENCY NAME MALES MALES FEMALES FEMALES TOTAL TOTAL CHILILABOMBWE 28,058 51.1% 26,835 48.9% 54,893 5.4% CHINGOLA 34,695 49.7% 35,098 50.3% 69,793 6.8% NCHANGA 23,622 50.0% 23,654 50.0% 47,276 4.6% KALULUSHI 32,683 50.1% 32,614 49.9% 65,297 6.4% CHIMWEMWE 29,370 48.7% 30,953 51.3% 60,323 5.9% KAMFINSA 24,282 51.1% 23,214 48.9% 47,496 4.6% KWACHA 31,637 49.3% 32,508 50.7% 64,145 6.3% NKANA 27,595 51.9% 25,562 48.1% 53,157 5.2% WUSAKILE 23,206 50.5% 22,787 49.5% 45,993 4.5% LUANSHYA 26,658 49.5% 27,225 50.5% 53,883 5.3% ROAN 15,921 50.1% 15,880 49.9% 31,801 3.1% LUFWANYAMA 18,023 50.2%
  • Members of the Northern Rhodesia Legislative Council and National Assembly of Zambia, 1924-2021

    Members of the Northern Rhodesia Legislative Council and National Assembly of Zambia, 1924-2021

    NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF ZAMBIA Parliament Buildings P.O Box 31299 Lusaka www.parliament.gov.zm MEMBERS OF THE NORTHERN RHODESIA LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL AND NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF ZAMBIA, 1924-2021 FIRST EDITION, 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................................ 3 PREFACE ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................................... 5 ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 7 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 9 PART A: MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL, 1924 - 1964 ............................................... 10 PRIME MINISTERS OF THE FEDERATION OF RHODESIA .......................................................... 12 GOVERNORS OF NORTHERN RHODESIA AND PRESIDING OFFICERS OF THE LEGISTRATIVE COUNCIL (LEGICO) ............................................................................................... 13 SPEAKERS OF THE LEGISTRATIVE COUNCIL (LEGICO) - 1948 TO 1964 ................................. 16 DEPUTY SPEAKERS OF THE LEGICO 1948 TO 1964 ....................................................................
  • Citi Worldlink Payment Services

    Citi Worldlink Payment Services

    Citi WorldLink Payment Services This Reference Booklet provides information for payments via the following May 2014 communication methods: • CitiDirect • File Transmission • SWIFT The material contained in this Reference Book is for informational purposes only, and is provided solely as a courtesy by WorldLink. Although WorldLink believes this information to be reliable, WorldLink makes no representation or warranty with respect to its accuracy or completeness. The information in this Reference Book does not constitute a recommendation to take or refrain from taking any action, and WorldLink is not providing any tax, legal or other advice. Citigroup and its affiliates accept no liability whatsoever for any use of this material or any action taken based on or arising from anything contained herein. The information in this Reference Book is subject to change at any time according to changes in local law. WorldLink is not obligated to inform you of changes to local law. Citibank Europe plc may, at its discretion, reasonably modify or amend this Reference Booklet from time to time, which modification or amendment will become binding when your organization receives a copy of it. These materials are confidential and proprietary to Citigroup or its affiliates and no part of these materials should be reproduced, published in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopy or any information storage or retrieval system nor should the materials be disclosed to third parties without our express written authorization. The authoritative and official text of this Reference Booklet—a part of the User Manual—shall be in the English language as used in the United States of America.
  • SUMMARY REPORT Assessment of the Zambian Barbet for Red Listing Purposes

    SUMMARY REPORT Assessment of the Zambian Barbet for Red Listing Purposes

    SUMMARY REPORT Assessment of the Zambian Barbet for Red Listing Purposes Lizanne Roxburgh December 2007 Zambian Ornithological Society, PO Box 33944, Lusaka, Zambia AND Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa Email: [email protected] Sponsored by the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, the UK Partner of BirdLife, and the Cleveland Metroparks Zoo and the African Bird Club Assessment of the Zambian Barbet for Red Listing Purposes 1. SUMMARY The Zambian barbet is confined to the Southern and Central provinces of Zambia, and is Zambia’s only endemic bird species. The 2004 IUCN Red List Category for Zambian barbet is Near Threatened, but their current status, and distribution were poorly known. Therefore systematic surveys of this species were begun in 2006, in three regions: 1) the Kafue Flats and adjacent areas, 2) Kafue National Park (KNP), and 3) the eastern part of their range. During the surveys, I drove along roads and tracks, and collected data on habitat suitability for Zambian barbets at approximately 5 km intervals. I visited sites in 23 of the 28 quarter degree squares where barbets were historically seen. Sites were classified as suitable depending on the tree species composition and presence of sycamore fig trees, upon which Zambian barbets are highly dependent. I determined the habitat suitability of 397 sites. I searched for barbets in areas of suitable habitat by using playback of their calls and the calls of black-collared barbets. These two barbet species react to each others calls in regions where their distribution overlaps.
  • Chiefdoms/Chiefs in Zambia

    Chiefdoms/Chiefs in Zambia

    CHIEFDOMS/CHIEFS IN ZAMBIA 1. CENTRAL PROVINCE A. Chibombo District Tribe 1 HRH Chief Chitanda Lenje People 2 HRH Chieftainess Mungule Lenje People 3 HRH Chief Liteta Lenje People B. Chisamba District 1 HRH Chief Chamuka Lenje People C. Kapiri Mposhi District 1 HRH Senior Chief Chipepo Lenje People 2 HRH Chief Mukonchi Swaka People 3 HRH Chief Nkole Swaka People D. Ngabwe District 1 HRH Chief Ngabwe Lima/Lenje People 2 HRH Chief Mukubwe Lima/Lenje People E. Mkushi District 1 HRHChief Chitina Swaka People 2 HRH Chief Shaibila Lala People 3 HRH Chief Mulungwe Lala People F. Luano District 1 HRH Senior Chief Mboroma Lala People 2 HRH Chief Chembe Lala People 3 HRH Chief Chikupili Swaka People 4 HRH Chief Kanyesha Lala People 5 HRHChief Kaundula Lala People 6 HRH Chief Mboshya Lala People G. Mumbwa District 1 HRH Chief Chibuluma Kaonde/Ila People 2 HRH Chieftainess Kabulwebulwe Nkoya People 3 HRH Chief Kaindu Kaonde People 4 HRH Chief Moono Ila People 5 HRH Chief Mulendema Ila People 6 HRH Chief Mumba Kaonde People H. Serenje District 1 HRH Senior Chief Muchinda Lala People 2 HRH Chief Kabamba Lala People 3 HRh Chief Chisomo Lala People 4 HRH Chief Mailo Lala People 5 HRH Chieftainess Serenje Lala People 6 HRH Chief Chibale Lala People I. Chitambo District 1 HRH Chief Chitambo Lala People 2 HRH Chief Muchinka Lala People J. Itezhi Tezhi District 1 HRH Chieftainess Muwezwa Ila People 2 HRH Chief Chilyabufu Ila People 3 HRH Chief Musungwa Ila People 4 HRH Chief Shezongo Ila People 5 HRH Chief Shimbizhi Ila People 6 HRH Chief Kaingu Ila People K.
  • Central Province General Profile Infographic

    Central Province General Profile Infographic

    ADAPTED BY APRIL 2018 Research and Analysis Department - Designed by Communications ©2018 Policy Monitoring and Research Centre (PMRC) CENTRAL PROVINCE [email protected] www.pmrczambia.com GENERAL PROFILE INFOGRAPHIC SUBSCRIBE NOW: [email protected] GENERAL PROFILE POLITICAL AND ADMINISTRATION PROFILE MAJOR NATURAL RESOURCES LOCATION CONSTITUENCY AGRICULTURE The Province has . Each constituency is represented by (1) elected member Central Province consists of 9.4 million hectares of land, Central province lies at the heart of Zambia. The province shares borders with 16 Constituencies of parliament (MP). CENTRAL about 40% of which is suitable for crop production and the Democratic Republic of Congo and eight other provinces of Zambia with an about 42% for livestock grazing exception of Northern. The Province occupies a total surface area of 108,460km and 16 CONSTITUENCIES PROVINCE is divided into twelve districts namely; Chibombo, Itezhi-tezhi, Kapiri, Shibuyunji FOREST Mposhi, Chitambo, Lunano, Mkushi, Mumbwa, Ngabwe, Chisamba and Serenje with The Province has a total number of 38 forest reserves Kabwe being the provincial capital. The province as at 2010 had a population of LOCAL GOVERNMENT predominantly covered by the Miombo woodland with an 1,332,396 with a gender ratio of 49% male and 51% female. estimated woody plant flora of about 650 species. The Province has (1) Municipality and 12 District Councils. The Mayor/ Council Chairpersons are the political heads of the local government. WILD LIFE 12 DISTRICT COUNCILS The wilderness is characterized by the vastness of unexploited areas, MALE FEMALE such as the Kafue National Park, Itezhi-tezhi dam, the Kafue River and WARDS the wetlands or Kafue flood plains.
  • Selection of Target Districts Revised Report

    Selection of Target Districts Revised Report

    SYSTEMS FOR BETTER HEALTH Project Implementation Working Paper Selection of Target Districts Revised Report March 2016 This project implementation working paper was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Abt Associates for the USAID Systems for Better Health activity. Selection of Target Districts Contract/Project No.: Task Order No. AID611-TO-16-00001 Contract No. AID-OAA-I-14-00032 Submitted to: William Kanweka, Contracting Officer’s Representative USAID/Zambia Prepared by: Abt Associates In collaboration with: American College of Nurse-Midwives Akros Inc. BroadReach Institute for Training and Education Initiatives Inc. Imperial Health Sciences Save the Children DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government USAID Systems for Better Health ▌pg. i Selection of Target Districts USAID Systems for Better Health ▌pg. ii Selection of Target Districts Table of Contents Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................... iv 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Background regarding target districts ................................................................................................... 5 1.2 SBH activities at each level of the health system