20190204 Tip Sheet 4

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

20190204 Tip Sheet 4 PBOT GLOSSARY OCTOBER 2019 cut-through (n. and adj.) FEMA Acronym for the Federal reference to lanes sometimes referred write alone. Otherwise, note ODOT Acronym for the Oregon PPP Internal abbreviation for the Policy, runoff (n.) speed hump NACTO term for what the Transit Mall Capitalize in reference to Style guide for writing common terms, acronyms, and programs for public communications. Emergency Management Agency. Write to as carpool lanes by the public, but capitalization in MAX Light Rail. Department of Transportation. Write out Planning & Projects group. Do not use in Portland public is most likely to see on the Portland Transit Mall whether or not DEI Increasingly common abbreviation out on first usage. which are also used by transit, vanpools, on first usage. public communications. rush hour (n.), rush-hour (adj.) local streets and call speed bumps, often the word Portland appears. for diversity, equity, and inclusion in Lowercase generally when alone. etc. Write out on first usage, note mayor indicated by signage that says “bump.” describing training, courses, and other Capitalize only in formal titles with the predesignated Safe Routes to School PBOT program. FHWA Acronym for the Federal Highway hyphen in high-occupancy. Avoid OMF Abbreviation for city’s Office of Define on first usage and use pictures to TransitTracker Written as one word, This glossary is the work of the PBOT Communications team, with guidance from the 2018 Associated Press Stylebook, consultation with opportunities to engage on these topics. person’s name. Also: mayoral, mayor’s Note capitalization. Do not use Administration. Write out on first usage. shortening to HOVs, use HOV lanes on Management & Finance. As with PBOT, “pricing” General transportation term help tell the story. note capitalization. city staff, and research into best practices across trade publications, mainstream media, and public agencies. Language evolves and Avoid acronym in public communications acronym. Be sure to use all four letters to not second usage, if needed. office, etc. write out on first usage. used to refer to a suite of strategies that changes. Please ask us about any changes or additions you want to see reflected in the PBOT Glossary moving forward. Questions on wherever possible. If needed, write out confuse with other federal agencies. use fees to more accurately reflect the stairway TriMet Written as one word, note something not covered here? Ask Stacy Brewster with PBOT Communications. 503-823-2302 [email protected] on first usage to explain. IGA Common city acronym for an metered, unmetered Use to describe online sandbag (n. and v.) capitalization. demand for our transportation system. Fixing Our Streets PBOT program. intergovernmental agreement. Write out metered parking areas, metered spaces, or DEQ Abbreviation for the Oregon Examples of “pricing” include the cost of S-curve Capital S in all uses. stakeholder Capital F, O, and S. Write out, do not use on first usage and use sparingly. metered districts where parking has a PAC Alternatively used as acronym for TRIP Acronym for trip reduction AASHTO Acronym for American Associa- standard for car-share, ride-share, things that happen in the city of Department of Environmental Quality. parking, tolls, fees based on geographic acronym and define on first usage as a cost or is time-limited. Opposite is Pedestrian Advisory Committee or (n. and adj.) (v.) incentive program, used internally for ride-hailing, etc. Portland. Also: citywide. “In Motion” Internal PBOT term for area, time of day, or specific types of SDC Acronym for system development startup start up tion of State Highway and Transporta- Write out on first usage. voter-approved 10-cent gas tax and unmetered. Do not use meter district as political action committees. Avoid city employees. Not for public various plans such as East Portland in trips, or based on VMT. Never use alone charge. Write out on first usage. Plural tion Officials. Write out on first usage. Bike to Books PBOT program with city council Lowercase, especially heavy vehicle use tax. we do not have individual meters confusion, do not use acronym. state Lowercase generally, especially communications. director Lowercase generally when Motion, Southwest in Motion, etc. Do without describing more fully. is SDCs. ADA Acronym for Americans with Multnomah County Library. No hyphens, when written alone. Capitalize only anymore, but parking kiosks, also known when written alone. Lowercase in alone. Capitalize only in formal titles not use alone in public communications PARK(ing) Day National program PBOT TripCheck Written as one word, note Disabilities Act. Write out on first usage. note capitalization. when referring to the full formal name FTA Abbreviation for the Federal Transit as pay stations. sextant An instrument for taking constructions such as the state of with the person’s name. without quotes or defining what they participates in. Note capitalization and private for-hire Use hyphen between capitalization. Note capitalization in ADA ramp, ADA Title of Portland’s government body and its Administration. Write out on first usage. altitudes in navigation, not a term to be Oregon, Washington state (when BIKETOWN One word, all caps for D/M/W/ESB/SDVBE Current acronym are. For individual plans, use the full micromobility Transportation term not punctuation. second and third word only. Capitalize II, and the difference between ADA meetings: Portland City Council. used to describe sections of the city. differentiating from D.C.). Capitalize only TSP Acronym for Transportation System Portland's bike-share program. Note for the certification of contractors and geo-fence (adj., n., and v.) Term for a plan name, not acronyms. in wide usage. Define and use sparingly. Private For-Hire in headlines and titles. compliance (n.) and ADA-compliant (adj.) Lowercase council documents, referred See: quadrant. when referring to the formal name of Plan, adopted by the city and part of capitalization in BIKETOWN for All, sub-contractors that meet criteria for virtual geographic boundary defined by parking-protected bike lane Use Do not use acronym. to city council, etc. Do not use city JPACT Acronym for Metro’s Joint Policy midblock the government body, statehouse, etc., state and regional planning arterial PBOT technical jargon for BIKETOWN for All’s Pay-It-Forward being disadvantaged, minority-owned, the Global Positioning System (GPS) or hyphen, or use protected bike lane, as side guard commission. Advisory Committee on Transportation. prorate as in Oregon State Legislature, Oregon requirements. Write out on first usage, specific type of street. Not necessarily program, etc. women-owned, emerging small radio-frequency identification (RFID) appropriate. Do not use cycletrack. Write out on first usage. MO Internal abbreviation for the Statehouse, etc. understood by the public. Define and city hall Lowercase, especially when technology. Use hyphen in all usage. PWB Abbreviation for the Portland sight lines use sparingly. bikeway Term used to refer to specific businesses, or service-disabled veterans’ Maintenance Operations group. Never use sparingly. written alone. Capitalize only when Patch-a-thon Maintenance Operations bike routes or portions of bike routes business enterprises. This acronym land use (n. and adj.) use in public communications. Water Bureau. As with PBOT, write out stormwater (n. and adj.) TSUP Internal acronym for the referring to formal name of a building Get Portland Moving PBOT program. term for concentrated focus on pothole sign-up (n. and adj.) sign up (v.) ATS Internal abbreviation for the Active that are on streets with higher traffic must be written out in full and defined on first usage Temporary Street Use Permitting group. or alternative name for our city council: Write out, do not use acronym. and sinkhole repair. Note capitalization. single-occupancy vehicle Clunky term. street furniture Clunky term without Transportation & Safety group. Never volume, such as major arterials or before using it. Use sparingly and lane mile Industry term used by PBOT MOU Common city acronym for Do not use acronym in public Portland City Hall. to measure pavement surface, equal to memorandum of understanding. Write quadrant The community and local Use more colloquial driving alone in context, instead use specific examples use in public communications. collector streets that may have addition- accurately. Do not use older versions GIF Acronym for graphic interchange Pay-by-Plate PBOT terminology for pay communications. out on first usage and use sparingly. press’s preferred, informal, technically public communications. Do not use like benches or café seating, wherever al infrastructure like marked bike lanes, citywide such as MWESB, DMWESB, etc. 1 mile of standard-width motor vehicle station technology. Note capitalization AWSC Abbreviation for all-way stop format, files that support both animated and inaccurate but charmingly easier term to acronym. possible. parking-protected bike lanes, etc. Not to travel lane. Use this more accurate term and hyphens. U-turn (n. and adj.) Capital U in all uses. control. Write out on first usage and collector PBOT technical jargon for DOT Acronym for the U.S. Department of static images. Use all caps, plural is GIFs. mph Always abbreviate for miles per hour, describe the five (soon to be six) be used interchangeably with neighbor- instead of centerline miles. avoid in public communications. Use specific type of street. Not necessarily Transportation. Write out on first usage. use lowercase. Metric analog of kilometers geographic sections of Portland. Avoid single-occupancy vehicle Clunky term. Streetcar Capitalize in reference to unmetered No hyphen, see entry for hood greenway. GIS Abbreviation for geographic-based pay station Two words. Do not use more publicly understood terms understood by the public. Define and DPT Internal acronym for the Develop- lane-splitting (n. and adj.) Define first per hour should be abbreviated kph or term sextant in all usage. Use more colloquial driving alone in Portland Streetcar whether or not the metered.
Recommended publications
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
    [Show full text]
  • Light Rail Transit (LRT)
    Transit Strategies Light Rail Transit (LRT) Light rail transit (LRT) is electrified rail service that operates in urban environments in completely exclusive rights‐of‐way, in exclusive lanes on roadways, and in some cases in mixed traffic. Most often, it uses one to three car trains and serves high volume corridors at higher speeds than local bus and streetcar service. Design and operational elements of LRT include level boarding, off‐board fare payment, and traffic signal priority. Stations are typically spaced farther apart than those of local transit services and are usually situated where there are higher population and employment densities. MAX Light Rail (Portland, OR) The T Light Rail (Pittsburgh, PA) Characteristics of LRT Service LRT is popular with passengers for a number of reasons, the most important of which are that service is fast, frequent, direct, and operates from early morning to late night. These attributes make service more convenient—much more convenient than regular bus service—and more competitive with travel by automobile. Characteristics of LRT service include: . Frequent service, typically every 10 minutes or better . Long spans of service, often 18 hours a day or more . Direct service along major corridors . Fast service Keys reasons that service is fast are the use of exclusive rights‐of‐way—exclusive lanes in the medians of roadways, in former rail rights‐of‐way, and in subways—and that stations are spaced further apart than with bus service, typically every half mile (although stations are often spaced more closely within downtown areas). Rhode Island Transit Master Plan | 1 Differences between LRT and Streetcar Light rail and streetcar service are often confused, largely because they share many similarities.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Wilsonville Transit Master Plan
    City of Wilsonville Transit Master Plan CONVENIENCE SAFETY RELIABILITY EFFICIENCY FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY FRIENDLY SERVICE EQUITY & ACCESS ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY JUNE 2017 Acknowledgements The City of Wilsonville would like to acknowledge the following for their dedication to the development of this Transit Master Plan. Their insight and outlook toward the future of this City helped create a comprehensive plan that represents the needs of employers, residents and visitors of Wilsonville. Transit Master Plan Task Force Planning Commission Julie Fitzgerald, Chair* Jerry Greenfield, Chair Kristin Akervall Eric Postma, Vice Chair Caroline Berry Al Levit Paul Diller Phyllis Millan Lynnda Hale Peter Hurley Barb Leisy Simon Springall Peter Rapley Kamran Mesbah Pat Rehberg Jean Tsokos City Staff Stephanie Yager Dwight Brashear, Transit Director Eric Loomis, Operations Manager City Council Scott Simonton, Fleet Manager Tim Knapp, Mayor Gregg Johansen, Transit Field Supervisor Scott Star, President Patrick Edwards, Transit Field Supervisor Kristin Akervall Nicole Hendrix, Transit Management Analyst Charlotte Lehan Michelle Marston, Transit Program Coordinator Susie Stevens Brad Dillingham, Transit Planning Intern Julie Fitzgerald* Chris Neamtzu, Planning Director Charlie Tso, Assistant Planner Consultants Susan Cole, Finance Director Jarrett Walker Keith Katko, Finance Operations Manager Michelle Poyourow Tami Bergeron, Planning Administration Assistant Christian L Watchie Amanda Guile-Hinman, Assistant City Attorney Ellen Teninty Stephan Lashbrook,
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Oswego to Portland Transit Project: Health Impact Assessment
    Lake Oswego to Portland Transit Project: Health Impact Assessment Program Partner Metro Funders US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Network of Public Health Institutes Oregon Public Health Institute www.orphi.org Prepared by: Steve White, Sara Schooley, and Noelle Dobson, Oregon Public Health Institute For more information about this report contact: Steve White, [email protected] Acknowledgements: This project relied on the time and expertise of numerous groups and individuals. Metro staff members Kathryn Sofich, Jamie Snook, Brian Monberg, and Cliff Higgins served on the Project Team and provided documentation, data, and input for all phases of the HIA. They also helped create and sustain interest within Metro for participating in this project. Other Metro staff members also provided valuable comments and critiques at the five brown bags held at Metro to talk about this project and HIA more generally. Substantial input was also provided by the project’s Advisory Committee which provided input on scoping and assessment methodology, and reviewed drafts at various stages. AC members included: Julie Early-Alberts, State of Oregon Public Health Division Gerik Kransky, Bicycle Transportation Alliance Scott France, Clackamas County Community Health John MacArthur, Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium Mel Rader, Upstream Public Health Maya Bhat, MPH, Multnomah County Health Department Brendon Haggerty, Clark County Public Health Joe Recker, TriMet Amy Rose, Metro Daniel Kaempff, Metro Special thanks are also due to Aaron Wernham, project director for Pew Charitable Trust’s Health Impact Project, for providing valuable insight and advice at the project’s outset regarding the coordination of HIA and Environmental Impact Statements.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transit a History of Public Transit in Portland
    Hilary Pfeifer Meredith Dittmar PUBLIC TRANSIT A history of public transit in Portland Melody Owen Mark Richardson Smith Kristin Mitsu Shiga Chandra Bocci trimet.org/history Traveling through time Dear Reader, Transit plays a critical role in providing options for traveling throughout the region. It connects people to work, school, recreational destinations and essential services. It’s not just a commuter service. It’s a community asset. And the benefits extend far beyond those who ride. TriMet’s transit system is recognized as a national leader for its connection to land use. By linking land-use planning and transit, we have helped create livable communities, vibrant neighborhoods and provide alternatives to driving. Transit is also a catalyst for economic development. More than $10 billion in transit-oriented development has occurred within walking distance of MAX light rail stations since the decision to build in 1980. Developers like the permanence of rail when investing in projects. Transit is also valued by the community. Most of our riders— 81 percent—are choice riders. They have a car available or choose not to own one so they can ride TriMet. With more than 325,000 trips taken each weekday on our buses, MAX Light Rail and WES Commuter Rail, we eliminate 66 million annual car trips. That eases traffic congestion and helps keep our air clean. TriMet carries more people than any other U.S. transit system our size. Our many innovations have drawn the attention of government leaders, planners, transit providers and transit users from around the world. We didn’t start out that way.
    [Show full text]
  • Informing Subterranean Transit Station Design from Existing And
    Portland State University PDXScholar University Honors Theses University Honors College 6-12-2019 Informing Subterranean Transit Station Design from Existing and Future Station Typologies; an Informative Exploration of how to Develop Underground Station Design for MAX Light Rail Antonio P. Ramos-Crosier Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/honorstheses Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Ramos-Crosier, Antonio P., "Informing Subterranean Transit Station Design from Existing and Future Station Typologies; an Informative Exploration of how to Develop Underground Station Design for MAX Light Rail" (2019). University Honors Theses. Paper 797. https://doi.org/10.15760/honors.815 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Informing Subterranean Transit Station Design from Existing and Future Station Typologies; an Informative Exploration of how to Develop Underground Station Design for MAX Light Rail Image 1: MAX Red line crossing the Steel Bridge, which is a key piece of infrastructure that the regional connector aims to avoid with the implementation of a new tunnel. Image taken by Antonio Crosier. By: Antonio Ramos-Crosier Advisor: Jeff Schnabel 1 MAX Regional Connector Ramos-Crosier Research Question: In anticipation of TriMet and the City
    [Show full text]
  • Service Alerts – Digital Displays
    Service Alerts – Digital Displays TriMet has digital displays at most MAX Light Rail stations to provide real-time arrival information as well as service disruption/delay messaging. Some of the displays are flat screens as shown to the right. Others are reader boards. Due to space, the messages need to be as condensed as possible. While we regularly post the same alert at stations along a line, during the Rose Quarter MAX Improvements we provided more specific alerts by geographical locations and even individual stations. This was because the service plan, while best for the majority of riders, was complex and posed communications challenges. MAX Blue Line only displays MAX Blue Line disrupted and frequency reduced. Shuttle buses running between Interstate/Rose Quarter and Lloyd Center stations. trimet.org/rq MAX Blue and Red Line displays page 1 – Beaverton Transit Center to Old Town MAX Blue/Red lines disrupted and frequency reduced. Red Line detoured. Shuttle buses running between Interstate/RQ and Lloyd Center. trimet.org/rq MAX Blue and Red Line displays page 2 – Beaverton Transit Center to Old Town Direct shuttle buses running between Kenton/N Denver Station, being served by Red Line, and PDX. trimet.org/rq MAC Red and Yellow displays – N Albina to Expo Center Red, Yellow lines serving stations btwn Interstate/RQ and Expo Center. trimet.org/rq. Connect with PDX shuttle buses at Kenton. MAX Red display – Parkrose Red Line disrupted, this segment running btwn Gateway and PDX. Use Blue/Green btwn Lloyd Center and Gateway, shuttles btwn Interstate/RQ and Lloyd Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Trimet SE Service Enhancement Plan
    Presentation to the Clackamas County Board of County Commissioners September 22, 2015 Schedule Westside: Completed in 2014 Southwest: Completed in 2015 Eastside: Completion in 2016 Southeast: Completion in 2016 North/Central: Completion in 2016 Annual Service Plan Optimize & Maintain Restore Increase Capacity & Restore Frequent Increase spans & Reliability Service Levels frequencies Schedule & detail Add new lines tweaks Optimize routes & schedules Reconfigure lines Hillsboro Beaverton Gresham Portland Forest Grove/ Cornelius Tigard Happy Milwaukie King Valley City Lake Oswego Tualatin Legend Sherwood West Job center Linn Oregon City Downtown trips Hillsboro Beaverton Gresham Portland Forest Grove/ Cornelius Tigard Happy Milwaukie King Valley City Lake Oswego Tualatin Legend Sherwood West Job center Linn Oregon City Downtown trips Hillsboro Beaverton Gresham Portland Forest Grove/ Cornelius Tigard Happy Milwaukie King Valley City Lake Oswego Legend Tualatin Sherwood West Job center Linn Oregon City Downtown trips Outreach efforts: More service to Sunnyside Rd. Clackamas Industrial Area OC to Tualatin service Service to S. Oregon City trimet.org/southeast SOUTHEAST Help make transit better in your community Making Transit Better in Southeast Draft Vision We’ve been talking with riders What we heard from the community and community members We learned from Southeast riders and residents about the about improving bus service in challenges they face today and how the region will grow in the future. Based on this, we’re proposing more and better Southeast Portland, Estacada, bus service to help people get to jobs, education, health Gladstone, Happy Valley, care, affordable housing and essential services. Proposed Milwaukie, Oregon City and bus service improvements include route changes and extensions, new bus lines, adjusted frequency and better Clackamas County.
    [Show full text]
  • MAG Regional Commuter Rail System Study Update Final Report
    2018 REGIONAL COMMUTER RAIL SYSTEM STUDY UPDATE Maricopa Association of Governments | May 2018 APPENDICES MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS REGIONAL COMMUTER RAIL SYSTEM STUDY UPDATE Appendix A: Methodology for Cost Estimating May 2018 Page intentionally left blank. Table of contents 1.0 METHODOLOGY FOR COST ESTIMATING __________________________________ 1 1.1 Purpose __________________________________________________________ 1 1.2 General __________________________________________________________ 1 1.3 Cost Estimate Format _______________________________________________ 1 1.4 Capital Cost Estimates ______________________________________________ 2 1.5 O&M Cost Estimates ________________________________________________ 2 2.0 ASSUMPTIONS AND BASIS OF ESTIMATE _________________________________ 3 2.1 General __________________________________________________________ 3 i Page intentionally left blank. ii 1.0 METHODOLOGY FOR COST ESTIMATING 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this document is to present the methodology that will be used to estimate the capital and the annual operating and maintenance (O&M) costs for the MAG System Study Update commuter rail corridors. The cost estimates will follow the methodology discussed below to the maximum extent practical given that no conceptual engineering has been completed to date. Where no detail for cost estimating is available, unit costs on a major level such as route track mile, complete station, or other lump sum will be utilized. 1.2 General The cost estimates for the MAG System Study Update are based upon: Conceptual level design or less. Recent costs experienced or estimated for the commuter rail and freight railroad industries. Costs experienced on recent commuter rail projects. Unit costs obtained from major vendors, as appropriate. Federal funding sources and will follow Federal Transit Administration and Federal Highway Administration procedures. In addition, the following will be included with the cost estimates: A comprehensive list of assumptions and all supporting documents supporting line item costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Trolleys Through the Timber - Richard Thompson
    Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society Volume 19 503 Issue 2 Spring 2014 Reminder to members: Please be sure your dues In this issue: are up to date. 2014 dues were due Jan 1, 2014. Trolleys Through the Timber - Richard Thompson....................1 Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society News.......................2 If it has been longer than one year since you renewed, Interpretative Center Update Greg Bonn....................................2 go to our website: oerhs.org and download an Red Trolleys in the Sun Mark Kavanagh..................................5 application by clicking: Become a Member MAX Yellow Line Lou Bowerman ..............................................6 Seattle Transit Update Roy Bonn................................................7 Tucson Sun Link Update Roy Bonn............................................9 See this issue in color on line DC Streetcar Update Roy Bonn..............................................10 at oerhs.org/transfer Pacific Northwest Transit Update Roy Bonn..............................10 Spotlight on Members: Hal Rosene ..........................................11 Trolleys Through the Timber Oregon’s Small Town Streetcar Systems By Richard Thompson The following article is excerpted from Richard's upcoming book, “Trolleys Through the Timber: Oregon's Small Town Streetcar Systems.” As the working title indicates, it will focus upon streetcars outside of Portland. This new endeavor will allow the author to further develop information about small town streetcar systems that previously appeared in his online Oregon Encyclopedia entries, and his four books for Arcadia Publishing. By the turn of the 20th century the Small town streetcar systems often relied on secondhand rolling stock. This interurban- street railway had become a vital part of like Forest Grove Transportation Company car is thought to have started life as a trailer urban transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • WSK Commuter Rail Study
    Oregon Department of Transportation – Rail Division Oregon Rail Study Appendix I Wilsonville to Salem Commuter Rail Assessment Prepared by: Parsons Brinckerhoff Team Parsons Brinckerhoff Simpson Consulting Sorin Garber Consulting Group Tangent Services Wilbur Smith and Associates April 2010 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 3 WHAT IS COMMUTER RAIL? ................................................................................................... 3 GLOSSARY OF TERMS............................................................................................................ 3 STUDY AREA....................................................................................................................... 4 WES COMMUTER RAIL.......................................................................................................... 6 OTHER PASSENGER RAIL SERVICES IN THE CORRIDOR .................................................................. 6 OUTREACH WITH RAILROADS: PNWR AND BNSF .................................................................. 7 PORTLAND & WESTERN RAILROAD........................................................................................... 7 BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY ..................................................................................................... 7 ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wilsonville's Transportation Vision
    Wilsonville Transportation System Plan Adopted by Council (Ord. 718) June 17, 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Wilsonville Transportation System Plan 2013 Acknowledgements This project was partially funded by a grant from the Transportation Growth Management (TGM) Program, a joint program of the Oregon Department of Transportation and the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development. This TGM grant is financed, in part, by federal Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), local government, and State of Oregon funds. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect views or policies of the State of Oregon. This report was prepared through the collective effort of the following people: CITY OF WILSONVILLE TECHNICAL ADVISORY Chris Neamtzu COMMITTEE Katie Mangle Caleb Winter, Metro Nancy Kraushaar Clark Berry, Washington County Steve Adams Larry Conrad, Clackamas County Mike Ward Aquilla Hurd-Ravich, City of Tualatin Linda Straessle Julia Hajduk, City of Sherwood Mark Ottenad Dan Knoll PLANNING COMMISSION Dan Stark Ben Altman, Chair Eric Postma, Vice Chair SMART Al Levit, CCI Chair Stephan Lashbrook Marta McGuire, CCI Vice Chair Steve Allen Amy Dvorak Jen Massa Smith Peter Hurley Jeff Owen* Ray Phelps ODOT CITY COUNCIL Gail Curtis Tim Knapp, Mayor Doug Baumgartner Scott Starr, Council President Richard Goddard DKS ASSOCIATES Julie Fitzgerald Scott Mansur Susie Stevens Brad Coy Celia Núñez** Carl Springer Steve Hurst** Mat Dolata ANGELO PLANNING GROUP Darci Rudzinski ** Former City Councilor involved in the Shayna Rehberg process prior to adoption * Former Employee How to Use This Plan The Wilsonville TSP consists of RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER CITY PLANS two parts: The Wilsonville Transportation System Plan (TSP) replaces the 2003 TSP in its entirety.
    [Show full text]