DOCSLIB.ORG

GENERAL ELECTRIC the Information Contained in This Report Has Been Prepared for Use by the ~Enerolelectric Company and Its Employees

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GENERAL ELECTRIC the Information Contained in This Report Has Been Prepared for Use by the ~Enerolelectric Company and Its Employees COST VERSUS WEIGHT OF SELECTED MANUFACTURED PRODUCTS by J. A. Murphy Report No. 58GL18 January 15, 1958 GENERAL ELECTRIC The information contained in this report has been prepared for use by the ~enerolElectric Company and its employees. No distribution should be made outside the Company except when indicated below: General Engineering Laboratory COST VERSUS WEIGHT OF SELECTED MANUFACTURED PRODUCTS by J. A. Murphy Report No. 580~8 January 15,1950 Prepared at the Request of: Mechanical Ehgineering Laboratory Instructed by: F. J. Neugebauer GENERAL @ ELECTRIC SCHENECTADY, NEW YORK General Engineering Laboratory SCHENZCTADY, NEW YORK TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERIES --- AUTHOR I SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION I "" 580U.0 DATE 1 1-15-58 TITLE COST VERSUS WEIGHT OF SELETED K4NUFACTUREg) PRODUC TS - ABSTRACT Compiled are the results of a survey of weight versus cost of manufactured products. Items surveyed include automobiles, electric mtora, electric generating sets and domestic appliancas. Sources used were manufacturers literature and open literature for the 1956- 1957 period. -- A -.- O.E. CLASS NO. PAGES 2 REPRODVCIULE COPY Fll ED AT I.IAi78R~OF . GENERAL ENGINEEHINC; LABORATORY GOV. CLASS. SCHENECTADY. NEW YQRK 17 None CONCLUSIONS Within a given type of product, the cost-weight ratio is generally constant. Purpose A problem which always exists when a new product is brought out is the price of the unit. Obviously it is ofton not practical to price an item at it8 actual cost plus a reaeonable profit. The first units al- ways cost more to produce, and once quantity production end manufactur- ing experience has beon achieved, production costa will be eubstantially lower. One criteria for aetting the price of a unit is ita weight. Obviously the cost-weight ratio depends upon many variables, such as the relative complexity of the product, quantities manufactured, portability requira- ments, etc. Thie mrvey wae conducted to accumulate data on various types of manufactured products, so ae to sUow comparieons to be made. Contents Itoms covered in this report are Electric Motore (l/4 to 1s HP), Air Cooled Motor Oenerator Sete (500 to 3500 watts), Outboard Motors, Passenger Cars, Power Saws, Power Lawn Mowers, Refrigerators, Vacuum Cleanors, Washer-Dryer Combinations, Room Air Conditioners, Dishwashers, Washing Machines, Clothes Dryers and Gas Rangea. Indexing Wstem The items are not indaxed because of the relative few products reported. Oriain This report is compiled by the Technical Literature Component of the General Engineering Laboratory for the Mechanical Engineering faboratory. GENERAL PURPOSE- 60 CYCLE ll0 VOLTS 1800 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS (born Manuf ac turera Literature) October 30, 1957 -Make -Price Weight Dollars per Lb, herson Rectric Model 1107 $42 -17 25' Emerson Electric Model 1118 54.32 28 Emerson Electric Model 1163 67.68 33 Emerson Gl ec tric Model 1087 84.39 40 Emerson ELectric Model 221 131.00 68 Howell Model C1 47 .90 28 Howell Model C1 47.90 29 Howell Model C1 48 ,oo 4 7 Howell Model C1 79.65 47 Howell Model C1 98 15 73 Howell Model C1 15'2 000 79 Howell Model C1 196,oO 114 Howell Model C1 306,OO 200 Howell Model C1 405.00 24l Master Electric (FR) AGREX 4l.00 29 Master Electric (FR) ACARP B9.00 34 P".asLer Electric (FR) ACME 59 ,OO 38 -1- General Purpose 60 Cycle 110 Volts 1800 RPM Qectric Motors (~ont'd,) -Make Size HP -Price -Weight Dollars per Lb, Master Electric AOIVUS (FR) 314 75eoo ll2 1.78 Master Electric A JAX (Integral) 1 lSlo00 72 Master Electric AXATO (squirrel Cage) 2 160.00 67 Master Electric ANGLO (squirrel) 5 21 2 000 115 Master nectric SYAK (Squirrel Cage) LO 352 .OO 205 Master Eloc tric KRA~E(Sluj.rre1Cage) 15 422 .OO 275 General ETectric Model K~36kl~135 32 ,OO 19 General El,ectric Model ~C42JG1 b2 .oo 22 General Electric Model KC~~MG~ 50 no0 2 5 General hlec tric Model KC45~3. 64.00 30 General Electric Model SKC1.82AG201 l3laOO 73 General Klec tric Modal SK~213~~201 231.00 120 General Electric 14odel 5KC 215~~1 378.00 140 kneral Electric Model K2561~ 37OoOQ 190 General Electric Nodel ~20kiJ 41r3 000 255 -SNALL AIR COOLKT3 MITOR GENERATOR SETS (worn Manufacturers Literature) Make- Watts Capacitz Weight Universal Model OllB 72 Urliver sal Model 31B 123 Uni versa1 Modal lrl~ 170 Univer sol Model ~BS 180 Universal Model nB 240 Fairbanks-Morse ~odsl6~-36 90 Fairbnnk&,Morse Model 10~-36 98 Fairbanks-Morse Model 15~-36 122 Fairbanks-Morse Model 2013-36 uo Fairbanks-Morse Model 25~-36 140 Fairbanksdorse Modal 30P-36 210 D .W .Onan Model 0%~-1~ 122 D6 W. Onan Model 07AK-1M 15'2 D. W. Onan Model 1AJ-1R 159 ----.--Smll Air Cooled Motor Generator-- Sets (Cont 'd ,) -Make ifattscapacity Price Weight- 180 195 Katolight Model 23~~~4 Katolight Modol Katolight Modol 1,4HA~4 Katolight Model ~HAB~ Katolight Node1 2 Katolight Model 3, HAW^ Read y-Power Model B~ANH Ready-Power Model B9ANH Ready-Power Model BlhAp~ Ready-Power Matel R~~ANH Ready-Powers Model B23ANH Homeli te Kodel 35AU5 IIomelite Model b115 Consmars Reports No. 6 -21 276-282 (1956) June Hake Horsepower Price Weight Dollar eger lb, - - 1_1 Johnson Sea Horse 3 3 $I46 00 34 ha29 Evinrude Fisherman St 218.00 57 3.83 Johnaon Sea Horse 73 7* 24l.00 59 4.08 Scott-Atwater 7i 7* 239.90 58 be13 Evlnrude Sportwin 10 321.00 75 4.28 Johnmn Sea Horse 15 15 362 .OO 86 be21 Evinrude Fa8turn 15 362.00 87 4.16 Scott-Atwater 16 16 357eoo 97 3.59 Mercuy Mark 25 20 395.00 95 4.16 Wards Sea King 25 379.00 130 3.18 Buccaneer 25 430.00 129 3 *33 Sears Elgin 25 38b.95 128 3 601 Weat Bend 25 LSo.00 113 3.89 Johnson Sea Horse 30 30 462.W 126 3.66 Evinrude Big Twln 30 L62 ,oo 129 3*58 Mercury Mark 30 30 b79.50 129 3eR6 Scott-Atwater 33 469 e9 l42 3.23 Mercury Mark 55 40 605.00 lM 4.32 Anonymoue, Automotive Industries llh 131 (1956) March Prices given are for lowest price-hdoor sedanr -Make -Price Hudson $2,179.00 Nash 2,I.M ,OO Rambler 1,642 000 Chrysler Windaor 2,565 .OO DeSoto 2,393 *OO Dodge 2,029 r 00 Imperial 4,381 .oo -Plymouth 1,686 .OO Continental 8,800 eOO '-/Ford 1,699 .OO Uncoln 3,821.00 Mercury 2,157.00 Buick 2,166 .OO Cad;illac 3,658.00 C hevrolet 1,675 000 Oldsmobile 2,226 .OO Pontiac 2,060 moo Studebaker 1,819 000 1 POWER CHAIN SAWS v' Conaurnor Reeearch Bulletin 38 No. 5 23-28 (1956) November In each aase, the least expGeive model of the manufacturer is described; Make Price Weight Dollare per lb. - II Clinton $170,00 2 '1 6.29 Hornelite 239000 IEL Power Tool8 26b.00 Mall Tools 2%00 Monarch Silver King 199.00 ljtrunk Chain Saws 195,00 Titan 2b5, 00 McC Uloch Motor a 223.00 POWhB LAWN MOWERS Consumer Reports -22 No. 6 260-266 (1957) June -Make Weight Dol1.ars per lb. Lewn Boy 3 9 Wardmaster 61 Lawn Boy- DeLwce 43 Mo to -Mower 46 Toro Whirlwind lr7 Jacobsen 5Ir Bolens 48 Tom Ir 0 Ekcello Pinehurat 51 Craftsman 47 Excello Broadmoor 53 Savage Rotor 55 Eclipse Duo Master 60 Homki Firebird 49 Reo Revo Trim 46 Reo Spin Trim 78 Fairbanks-Marse 49 Duo Trim 54 Wardmaster Self-Propelled 117.50 74 Huf f'y 92.95 52 Mo to-Mower 139-95 73 Power Lawn Mowers (~ontId. ) -Make -Price Welg ht Dollars per lb. Tom Sportlawn $139 95 72 Pennsylvania Acco 97.95 49 Huffy 124.95 67 Craftsman Self-Propelled Ub .% 96 Toro Whirlwind 11 139.95 72 Lawn Boy-htomwer 129.95 97 12 CUBIC FOOT REFRIGERATORS (From Manufacturers Literature) October 16,1957 -Make Dollars per lb Whirlpool Model DS-12T Norge Hodel C-137 Philco Model ~~1276 Montgomery Ward Model 1387 Hotpoint Model 127EW12 Oibeon Model GTD-12% Kelvinator Model K67013 Westinghouse Model TFK-12 Frigidaim Model ~1-121-57 General Electric Model BH-12P-Ol VACUUM CLEANERS (From Manufacturers Literature) October 16,1957 -Hake -Price Weight Dollars per 1b. Royal 901 $09.95 a-3/4 Singer C1 79.95 22 Kenmor e 20a0737L 74*95 31 General Electric Hodel R1 69.95 27 Hamilton Beach Model 28 79.50 26 Hoover Model 8b 97.50 25 Wizard Model 253553 lr9*95 25 Wisard Imperial Model 2 J~38f;b 69.95 23 Hontgomery Ward Model 85~367M& lr7 95 25 Fllter ween Model 500 l49.50 19 Universal Model 86765: lr9.95 23 Electrolux Model E 89.75: 13-3/ll Apex Strato Hodel 5555 l50.00 30 COMBINAT ION WASHKR-8RYIEn---..-- S (From Manufacturers Id teretur.~) October 30, 1957 General Electric WD560~lM $500 .OO 299 Whirlpool Model WS910500 Scars Hoe buck Turt.oma i,lc 3/4 TON ROOM AIR CONDITIONERS (From Manufacturers' Literature) October 16, 1957 -Make -Price Weight Dollere Der lb, Hotpoint Model ADS100 $379.95 165 Hotpoint Model 7~~150 379.95 170 hmna Model 100 D2M 329.50 40 Frigidaire Model AE-lOO-S-~c/-J.l 361r 95 220 Mitchell Model ~2s7 399.95 186 General. Electric Model lR62~A1-16 349.95 168 Philco Model A873-2 269 95 196 Carrier Model 51~k-llf; 399.95 194 Admiral Model UOMl.2 309 095 161 DISHWASHERS (From Manufacturers1 Literature) October 30,1957 -Make -Price Dollars' per lb , Kelvinator Model VllWP Jame 8-Univercr a1 Model 9900 Young stom Kitahena Model DW-301 Young down Kltchene Model DW-301-P Hotpolnt Model MCP27 Oenerel Electric Mc ?el SU-60R WASHING l?ACHINE\S .c---.-.I.-- (From Manufacturers' Litoratme) Oct,obsr 16,1957 Make Price Weight Dollar per lb, - I_ - K elvlnator Model ~~0-6 $290.00 225 Whirlpool Model ~570h00 2io.oo 218 Frigidairo Model mu-$7 380 00 238 Kenmore Autometio Waahor 2b5.00 252 Maytag Model 140 380.00 275' Norge Model I$-150 350.00 2W Weetinghouse Laundromat 350.00 280 Speodqueen Model A18 350400 252 Easy Model ADH 330.00 265 Phllco Model W-266 370.00 275 General Elec trio Washer ~460 350.00 254 CLOTHES DRYERS (From Manufacturerat Literature) October 30, 1957 -Make Weight Dollare per lb.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Montgomery Ward Robbery & Kidnapping
    LOCAL HISTORY WOODSTOCK & MCHENRY COUNTY Montgomery Ward Robbery & Kidnapping by Kirk Dawdy In 1926, the popular Montgomery Ward Mail Order Catalog Company broke with its mail-order-only tradition and successfully opened its first retail outlet store in Indiana. Two years later, 1928, the Stafford Furniture and Undertaking building on the west side of the square was razed to build a new Montgomery Ward retail store in Woodstock. Two years later, 1930, the Donnely residence and millinery shop just to the north of the store burned to the ground. In its’ place, an addition to the original Montgomery Ward building was built, doubling the store size. Today the building is known as the Woodstock Mall. Throughout the 1930s & ‘40s Woodstock’s Montgomery Ward was the largest department store in McHenry County and flourished. So much so, it became the target for a major robbery. The November 21st, 1949 issue of the Woodstock Sentinel reported “McHenry County’s crime wave which has caused considerable excitement in recent month turned into ‘big time’ status when a lone and desperate gunman staged one of the most daring holdups in Woodstock in many years.” The previous Saturday, November 19, 1949, soon after the Montgomery Ward store closed, a customer knocked on the front door saying he had left a package inside the store. Assistant Manager, Richard Henderson, recognized the man who had actually applied for a job several days earlier. After letting him inside, Henderson went to the basement to turn the store lights back on while store manager James Dwyer helped the customer retrieve his package.
    [Show full text]
  • Companies with Matching Gift Program
    COMPANIES WITH MATCHING GIFT PROGRAM Each organization has it’s own unique matching gift program. It is estimated that two thirds of companies match donations to most 501(c)3 organizations and educational institutions while the remainder matched to nonprofits which fall into one or multiple broadly defined categories such as: • Higher Education • K-12 Education • Arts and Cultural Organizations • Community Based Social Services • Environmental Organizations • Healthcare Based Organizations This is a partial list of companies across the US that are matching their employee's charitable contributions. Can you find your company among them? If not, see your Human Resources Officer and be the one to put your company on this list! A The Abbott Laboratories Fund Abell-Hanger Foundation, Inc. ACF Industries, Inc. ADC Foundation Adobe Systems Incorporated Adria Laboratories Advanced Micro Devices Aegon Transamerica Foundation The AES Corporation Aetna Foundation, Inc. Aid Association for Lutherans AIM Foundation Air Liquide America Corporation Akzo Nobel Inc. Albemarle Corporation Albertson's Inc. Alcoa Aluminum Company of America Allegheny Ludlum Corporation Allendale Insurance Foundation Allied-Signal Inc. Allstate Insurance Co. Amax Foundation, Inc. Ambac Financial Group, Inc. Amerada Hess Corporation American Airlines American Brands, Inc. American Cancer Society American Cyanamid Company American Electric Power System American Express Foundation American General Corporation American Home Products Corporation American International Group, Inc. American Medical International, Inc. American Ref-Fuel Company American Standard Inc. American Standard, Inc. Ameritech Amgen, Inc. Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Analog Devices Inc. Anchor Brewing Co. Anheuser-Busch Foundation AON Foundation Apache Corporation Apple Computer Corporation Apple Matching Gifts Program ARAMARK Corporation Argonaut Group, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Sears Catalogs Were Smaller Than Montgomery Ward So They Would Be Placed Atop Others
    Early Sears Catalogs Were Smaller Than Montgomery Ward So They Would Be Placed Atop Others What was once one of the most popular ways of shopping is remembered each year on August 18th as it is National Mail Order Catalog Day. On this day in 1872, Aaron Montgomery Ward of Chicago produced a catalog designed for direct order via mail. He aimed to remove the middleman from the business of buying and selling. As a result, he drastically lowered prices. The very first catalog consisted of an eight by 12-inch single sheet of paper. On it, Ward included the merchandise for sale, price list, and ordering instructions. Before long, the Montgomery Wards single-page list of products grew into a 540 page illustrated book selling over 20,000 items. One notable merchant, Richard Warren Sears, mailed his catalog in 1896. As others entered the field, catalog sales grew. By 1971, catalog sales of major United States firms exceeded more than $250 million in postal revenue. Early Sears catalogs were made smaller than Montgomery Ward catalogs so that neatnik housewives would stack them on top. According to the National Mail Order Association, Aaron Montgomery Ward wasn’t the first to conceive of mail order catalog. In the United States. Benjamin Franklin may have formulated the first basic mail order concept. He produced a catalog to sell scientific and academic books. Franklin also receives credit for offering the first mail-order guarantee: “Those persons who live remote, by sending their orders and money to B. Franklin may depend on the same justice as if present.” In 1845 Tiffany published its first mail order catalog, the Blue Book.
    [Show full text]
  • Scheller House Clings to Life
    Morning fog We are doomed Spartan hockey with increasing to repeat looks forward cloudiness in failure with to a winning the afternoon. Prop. 187. season. Highs in the 60s. See page 2... See page 4... \ohmic I \ SPARTAN it lit. 1 I l'11111111111.1 101 Sall Just. DAILY Sidllit I nit 11Sil% Sint I' I 93 I I ritti Nt.JintnI Ii. Pr) I Scheller house Agreement clings to life allows bikes Superior Court judge issues 60-day on San Carlos injunction against demoliton order By Makonnen Gebrehiwot Spartan Daily Stall Writer By Joanne Griffith Domingue "I think there's still an opportu- J. Handel Evans, San Jose State University Spartan Daily Stall wnter nity to save it (Scheller house)," president, and representatives of the Scheller house seems to have Fogel said. "But the chance to Associated Students Board of Directors as many lives as the cats who save Scheller house is to move signed a formal agreement on Monday, ensur- live in the building. it." ing a marked bicycle path through San Carlos Santa Clara County Superior Fogel directed the Preser- mall between Fourth and 10th streets. Court Judge Jeremy Fogel grant- vation Action Council to use all The agreement, which will have prece- ed a 60-day injunction against their best efforts in the next 60 dence over any future comprehensive traffic demolishing the historic struc- days, with government and agen- plans for the campus, indicates there may ture on San Carlos and Fifth cies, to relocate the house. have to be limitations on bicycle usage dur- streets at a hearing held in the And he told university officials ing days classes are in session.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Selection Guide to Refrigerators and Freezers
    Virginia Cooperative Extension Service Publication No. 356-160 August 1983 Consumer Selection Guide to Refrigerators and Freezers --- - ·· -- . [ VIRGINIA TECH AND VIRGINIA STATE• VIRGINIA'S LAND GRANT UNIVERSITIES LD ~55 lt'1&~ Consumer Guide fro ~- Key facts to consider before you buy: VP/ This selection guide will help you choose the refrigerator or freezer that's right for you. If you're like most S,ec,,. consumers, you'll keep your new refrigerator or freezer for 15 years or more, so it is especially important you make the right selection. Storage Capacity torage capacity is probably the If you live alone, seldom eat at home • Do you entertain frequently? most important buying considera­ and about the only time you open your A Word About Outside Dimensions. tion. A "too large" n1odel refrigerator is for ice cubes or a quick S Buy a model that will fit into your snack, the smaller single-door refriger­ refrigerates or freezes more space than house. Be sure to measure the space ator may be the right choice for you. \'our familv needs. A "too small" available for your new refrigerator or wili' require extra trips to the ~1odel On the other hand, if you answer "yes" freezer as well as door and hallway store or filling the unit too full for to many of the following questions, clearances and compare these require­ adequate air circulation. In each case, you probably should consider a larger ments to the outside dimensions of the higher operating cost will result. model. model you plan to buy. Also check The capacity of a refrigerator or freezer whether your room layout requires a • Do you have a large family? is measured in cubic feet of food stor­ left or right-hand door.
    [Show full text]
  • An Invitation
    An invitation... GREAT LAKES INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT Campus: East Coast Road, Manamai P.O. PIN 603 102, Tamil Nadu. Ph: 044-3080 9000 City Office: 19, North Mada Street, Srinagar Colony, Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015. Ph: 044-43123126 Website: www.greatlakes.edu.in MoU 32 1 Business Advisory Council Dr Ratan N Tata Mrs. Rajshree Pathy Dr V G Narayanan Chairman, Tata Sons Ltd. Managing Director, Rajshree Sugars Ltd. Associate Professor of Management Accounting, Harvard Business Mr Madhur Bajaj Mr. R.K. Krishna Kumar School Vice Chairman, Bajaj Auto Ltd. Director, Tata Sons Ltd. Dr Paul Prabhaker Mr Kumarmangalam Birla Mr. Vivek Paul Associate Dean & Professor (Marketing), College of Business Northern Illinois University Chairman, Aditya Birla Group Partner, Texas pacific Group. Dr Srinivasan Raghunathan Mr K B Chandrasekhar Mr. Pratik Kumar Associate Professor of Management Information Systems, School of Chairman and CEO, Jamcracker Inc Executive Vice President - Human resources, Wipro Management, The University of Texas Mr John Fisher Mr. Ravi Venkatesan Dr Raghuram Rajan Chairman, Solid Systems Engineering Chairman, Microsoft Corporation (India) Pvt. Ltd. Joseph L Gidwitz Professor of Finance, University of Chicago, Illinois Mr Jamshyd N Godrej Mr. P. Murari Dr Ram T S Ramakrishnan Chairman & Managing Director, Adviser to President of FICCI, Department of Accounting, University of Illinois Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. Former Secretary to President of India Dr Keshavamurthy Ramamurthy Mr G P Goenka Ms. Indra K. Nooyi Professor, Management Information Systems, University of Wisconsin Chairman, Duncans Group Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Pepsi Co. Dr V Kasturi Rangan Mr Deshbandhu Gupta Malcolm P McNair Professor of Marketing, Harvard Business School Chairman, Lupin Labs Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Downtown Walking Tour
    This the very back page of the bro- chure For more information about historical attractions: 101 High Street NE Masonic Temple Travel Salem 181 High Street NE 223-233 High Street NE Salem, OR 97301 T.G. Bligh Building (503) 581-4325 237-245 High Street NE 1-800-874-7012 Arthur Moore Building Salem, Oregon www.TravelSalem.com 102 - 110 Liberty Street NE Salem Community Development Department McGilchrist Building Historic Downtown Salem Civic Center 105 - 135 Liberty Street NE 555 Liberty Street SE, Room 305 Gray Building Salem, OR 97301 Walking Tour (503) 588-6173 120 Liberty Street NE www.cityofsalem.net Roth Company Building 145-147 Liberty Street NE Willamette Heritage Center Eckerlen Building Marion County Historical Society & Mission Mill Museum 1313 Mill Street SE 155 Liberty Street NE Salem, OR 97301 Skiff Building/Montgomery Ward (503) 585-7012 189 Liberty Street NE www.missionmill.org Reed Opera House 229 State Street Smith & Wade Building 236 State Street Meredith Building 241 State Street Salvation Army Building 246 State Street Catlin & Linn Building 315 - 333 State Street Durbin Building 351 - 367 State Street Farrar Building 356 State Street J.K. Gill Building 360 - 372 State Street Adolph Block 379 - 383 State Street Pomeroy Building 388 State Street First National Bank, Old/Capitol Tower/Livesley Building 508 - 524 State Street Bligh Building “There is no better way to enjoy the historic assets Walking Tour Map Building Key of a community than walking up close to a historic 1. Burker Building 2. Marion Car Rental and Park building and experiencing the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Companies with Matching Gift Programs
    Companies with Matching Gift Programs Many companies encourage charitable giving by matching gifts made by their employees. As a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, CHCA is eligible for matching gifts. Below is a list of companies that have matching gift programs. Even if a company is not listed, they may still have a matching gift program. In addition, not all companies match PK-12 schools. To find out if your company matches gifts made to CHCA, please contact your HR representative. If you need additional assistance, please e-mail Paige Tomlin at [email protected]. A AK Steel 3Com Corporation Albemarle Corp. 3M Company Alco Standard AlliedSignal Inc. Alexander and Baldwin Inc. Allstate Alexander Hamilton Life Abacus Capital Investments Alexander Haas Martin and Partners Abbott Laboratories Al Neyer Altera Corp. Contributions Allegro Microsystems Inc. Accenture Alliance Bernstein Access Fund Alliance Capital Management L.P. ACE INA Foundation Alliance Coal LLC Adams Harkness and Hill Inc. Alliant Techsystems Altria Group Allegiance Corp. and Baxter International Adaptec Foundation Allendale Insurance Foundation AMBAC Indemnity American Natl Bank & Trust ADC Telecommunications American Intl Group, Inc. AMD Corporate Giving American Standard Found Adobe Systems Inc. Amgen Inc. ADP Foundation AMN Healthcare Services American Express Co. AmSouth BanCorp. A & E Television Networks American Stock Exchange AEGON TRANSAMERICA Ameriprise Financial AEP Ameritech Corp. AES Corporation AMETEK / Sealtron A.E. Staley Manufacturing Co. AMSTED Industries Inc. American Fidelity Corp. Amylin Pharmaceuticals Aetna Foundation, Inc. Anadarko Petroleum Corp. American General Corp. Analytics Operations Engineering AG Communications Systems Analog Devices Inc. American Honda Motor Co. Avon Products Foundation, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Security Management Illinois 1, LLC, 364 NLRB No
    NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the will apply today’s holding prospectively and dismiss the bound volumes of NLRB decisions. Readers are requested to notify the Ex- ecutive Secretary, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. allegations in this case, but we will provide guidance 20570, of any typographical or other formal errors so that corrections can regarding the remedies that would be appropriate in later be included in the bound volumes. cases. Total Security Management Illinois 1, LLC and In- Background ternational Union Security Police Fire Profes- sionals of America (SPFPA). Case 13–CA– The complaint alleges that the Respondent, a provider 108215 of security planning and security services, violated Sec- tion 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act by discharging three unit August 26, 2016 employees without prior notice to or bargaining with DECISION AND ORDER International Union, Security, Police and Fire Profes- BY CHAIRMAN PEARCE AND MEMBERS MISCIMARRA, sionals of America (the Union or SPFPA), which repre- HIROZAWA, AND MCFERRAN sents the employees.2 The parties submitted, and the The issue in this case is whether the Respondent acted judge accepted, a stipulated record that establishes that unlawfully when it discharged three employees without the relevant facts are undisputed and the issue presented first giving the Union notice and an opportunity to bar- to us is the legal question whether the Respondent’s gain about the discharges.1 The judge found the dis- acknowledged failure to bargain with the Union before charges unlawful, relying on Alan Ritchey, Inc., 359 discharging the three employees was unlawful.
    [Show full text]
  • Companies with Matching Gift Programs
    Companies with matching gift programs *please contact your company for more information on how to sign up for your matching gift. 3M B D Matching Company Abbott Laboratories B F Goodrich ADP Foundation Bank One Corporation Aetna Foundation Banks-Baldwin Aid Association Luterans Barnes Group Foundation, Inc. AIG Baxter International Foundation Air Products and Chem Bearing Point Akzo Nobel Beatrice Food Corporation Alco Standard Foundation Bell & Howell Allendale Insurance Benjamin Moore & Co. Alliance Capital Management Best Products Foundation Allied Signal Black & Decker Allstate Foundation Boeing Altria BP America/Amoco American Eagle Burroughs Wellcome American Express Foundation C A I, Inc. American Red Cross Certain Teed Foundation Amsted Industries C N A Foundation/Dominion Aon Corporation C P C International Apple Carrier Corporation Arkwright Foundation Caterpillar Foundation Attachmate Corporation Celanese Corporation Aventis Pharmaceuticals Centel Corporation Aztec Peroxides, Inc./Degussa Initiators LLC Centerior Energy Champion International Deluxe Corporation Charles Schwab Digital Equipment Chase Manhattan/JP Morgan Chase Dillard Department Stores Chemical Bank Disney Chevron Foundation Dominion Chicago Tile and Trust Dow U S A Chiron Diagnostics Corporation Eaton Corporation Chubb & Son Inc. Ebay Cigna Foundation Eli Lilly & Company Cisco Embarq Citicorp Emerson Electric Company Citigroup Energizer Clariant Equitable life Assur Clorox Exxon Corporation Coca-Cola Company Fasteners for Retail Compaq Computer Corporation F
    [Show full text]
  • Company Match List 2020
    Employer Matching Company List 3Com Corporation Alco Standard Fdn. 3M Company AlCOA Foundation Abacus Capital Investments Alexander and Baldwin Inc. Abbot Laboratories Alexander and Baldwin Foundation Alexander Haas Martin and Partners Alexander Hamilton Life Accenture Foundation, Inc. Allegro Microsystems Inc. Access Fund Allegiance Corp. and Baxter International Allendale Insurance Foundation Allendale Mutual Insurance Co. AllianceBernstein ACE INA Foundation Alliance Capital Management L.P. Alliance Coal LLC Adams Harkness and Hill Inc. Alliant Techsystems Adaptec Foundation AlliedSignal Inc. ADC Foundation Allstate Foundation, The Allstate Giving Campaign ADC Telecommunications Altera Corp. Contributions Program Adobe Systems Inc. Altria Employee Involvement ADP Foundation Programs A & E Television Networks Altria Group AMBAC Indemnity Corporation AEGON TRANSAMERICA AMD Corporate Giving Program AEP American Express Co AES Corporation American Fidelity Corp. A.E. Staley Manufacturing Co. American General Corp. Aetna Foundation, Inc. American Honda Motor Co. Inc. AG Communications Systems American National Bank and Trust Co. of Chicago Agilent Technologies American Standard Foundation Aid Association for Lutherans American Stock Exchange AIG Matching Grants Program Air Liquide America Corporation Aileen S. Andrew Foundation Air Products and Chemicals Inc. Albemarle Corp. AIM Foundation Ameriprise Financial Ameritech Corp. Amgen Center American Inter Group Amgen Foundation Amgen Inc. Employer Matching Company List American International Group, Inc. Aspect Telecommunications Associates Corp. of North America AMSTED Industries Inc. Astra Merck Inc. AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. AstraZeneca Pharmaceutical LP Atapco Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Corp. Giving ATK Foundation Program Anadarko Petroleum Corp. Analog Devices Atlantic Data Services Inc. Analytics Operations Engineering Analog Devices Atochem North America Foundation ATOFINA Inc. Chemicals, Inc. Anchor/Russell Capital Advisors Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • O:\OPINIONS\Montgomery Ward OTC.Wpd
    FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ------------------------------------------------------X In re: Chapter 11 Case No. 00-4667(KG) Montgomery Ward, LLC, et al., Debtors. ------------------------------------------------------X MONTGOMERY WARD, LLC, et al., Adversary Proceeding Plaintiffs, v. No. 02-9282 (RTL) OTC INTERNATIONAL, LTD., Defendant. -------------------------------------------------------X OPINION APPEARANCES: MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL Donna L. Culver, Esq. Derek C. Abbott, Esq. Daniel B. Butz, Esq. Co-Counsel for Plaintiff A.S.K. FINANCIAL, LLP Joseph L. Steinfeld, Jr., Esq. Karen M. Scheibe, Esq. Co-Counsel for Plaintiff SILVERBERG STONEHILL GOLDSMITH & HABER, P.C. Kenneth R. Schachter, Esq. Mitchell L. Kaplan, Esq. Co-Counsel for Defendant THE BAYARD FIRM Kathryn D. Sallie, Esq. Ashley B. Stitzer, Esq. Co-Counsel for Defendant RAYMOND T. LYONS, U.S.B.J.1 Plaintiff sues to avoid preferential payments made within 90 days prior to the filing of bankruptcy on December 28, 2000. The Defendant maintains that all payments were made in the ordinary course and, therefore, not avoidable under 11 U.S.C. § 547(c)(2). Plaintiff responds that a reduction in payment terms from 60 days to 30 days just prior to the preference period prevents the payments from being ordinary. Because: (1) Montgomery Ward continued its practice of weekly payments of vendor invoices by due date; (2) Change in terms was ordinary between the parties; and (3) Defendant continued to ship without reservation and never engaged in any collection activity, the court finds the payments were made in the ordinary course and not avoidable. JURISDICTION This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]