DOCSLIB.ORG

Trade-Offs Between Feeding Competition and Predation Risk In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Trade-Offs Between Feeding Competition and Predation Risk In TRADE-OFFS BETWEEN FEEDING COMPETITION AND PREDATION RISK IN BABOONS by Guy Charles Cowlishaw Dissertation submitted to the University of London for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. University College London, Gower Street, London WCIE 6BT August 1993 ProQuest Number: 10017741 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10017741 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 For Sanjida ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work owes a great deal to many people. Without their kind and generous help this thesis would not have been possible. Thanks go to Peter Henzi (of the University of Natal), for suggesting Namibia as a possible study site in the first place; Chris Brown and Eugene Joubert (of the Ministry of Wildlife, Conservation and Tourism), for organizing and granting permission for me to conduct research in Namibia at very short notice; Alisdair MacDonald (of the same Ministry), for suggesting possible study sites; Joris Komen and Eugene Marais (of the Windhoek State Museum), for taking me along on a site visit (and also for checking out second-hand vehicles with me); Coleen Mannheimer, for finding my study site; Douglas Reissner (of the Namibia Nature Foundation), for all his time and effort in helping me to raise funds for a vehicle in Namibia; Herta Kohlberg (of the National Herbarium), for identifying my plant specimens; and Willem Kongombe, for his help in habituating baboons. In particular, I would like to thank Andre Retief and Coleen and John Mannheimer for their friendship and hospitality. Coleen and John were extremely kind hosts during my first month in Namibia, and remained firm friends thereafter. I am indebted to August Juchli for granting me permission to conduct this study at Tsaobis Leopard Park, and also to Winston Retief, Mr Behrends and Mr Snyman for allowing me to follow the baboons onto their land when they travelled out of the boundaries of Tsaobis. In the U.K., I would like to thank Louise Barrett and Nilofer Ghaffer for supplying me with scientific papers while out in the field. In addition, I am grateful to Dawn Hartley for a crash course in SPSS and John Pearson for a similar course in Fig-P while writing-up. My funding came primarily from a Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Studentship. However, contributions were also received from the University of London Central Research Fund and the Boise Fund (Oxford). In addition, the Namibia Nature Foundation, together with Rossing Uranium, Trail-A-Quip and Sun Alliance, kindly donated money towards the purchase of a second-hand vehicle in Namibia. To all these organizations, I am extremely grateful. My greatest thanks go to those people who became crucial to the success of this work: Peter and Desiree Bruce were my hosts at Tsaobis Leopard Park; they provided me with a neverending supply of help and friendship during my year there. Yvonne Cowlishaw, my mother has aided and abetted me throughout all stages of this work. Jon Davies assisted me in my fieldwork for four of the first six months; his company and practical contribution to the project were invaluable. Robin Dunbar, my supervisor, has been a constant source of friendship, intellectual stimulation, and moral and logistical support; his infectious enthusiasm and good humour have been indispensable. Rob Simmons and Phoebe Barnard were great friends and a tremendous source of advice, help and support during all stages of my work in Namibia; they made me feel at home in a foreign country as soon as I arrived, and continued to do so for the rest of my stay. The contribution that each of these individuals has made to this work cannot be understated. I am indebted to all of them and consider myself very lucky to have had their participation in this work. Finally, my most heartfelt thanks go to Sanjida O’ Connell. Sanjida worked with me in Namibia for the last three months of the study, during which time she collected half of the baboon data presented in this volume. In addition, she has had the misfortune to suffer the entirety of the interminable write-up. Sanjida’s contribution to this work has been very special. My thanks are equally so. ABSTRACT This study investigates the influence of feeding competition and predation risk on the behaviour and ecology of baboons. Four groups of chacma baboons ipapio cynocephalus ursinus) were habituated and studied over 12 months between 1990-91 in the Pro-Namib desert region of Namibia. Each group differed in size and composition (with 1-6 adult males occupying groups of between 22-55 members), but their ranges overlapped extensively. Additional data were collected describing (1) food quality and availability and (2) biologically relevant measures of predation risk. The results suggest that contest competition for food or safety was minimal both within and between groups in this population. However, scramble competition for food did occur, despite high levels of food availability. Female reproductive state had little influence on feeding or anti-predator behaviour. Females and individuals in small groups were shown to be at the greatest risk of predation, and responded as predicted by exhibiting the highest levels of anti-predator behaviour. Habitat use reflected a trade-off between food availability and the reduction of both diurnal and nocturnal predation risk. Individual spatial position within groups was influenced by male reproductive strategies and predation risk, although social constraints might also have been present. Vigilance in males reflected reproductive strategies while in females vigilance was aimed at predator detection. Trade-offs between foraging and predation risk were suggested in the patterns of home range habitat composition, the use of habitat in the home range, the presence of scramble feeding competition, the choice of feeding site and the choice of diet. In addition, large groups reduced feeding competition at the expense of increased predation risk. Finally, points of special interest included the reduction of predation risk by both (1) the active use of "rest" time and (2) the defensive behaviour of male group members. TABLE OF CONTENTS Title page ....................................................................................................................................... 1 D edication ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... 5 Abstract ..........................................................................................................................................7 Table of contents .............................................................................................................................9 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................15 1.1. Theoretical background ..................................................................................................... 16 1.1.1. Types of competition ..............................................................................................16 1.1.2. Determinants of competitive ability ......................................................................17 1.2. Competition for limited resources ........................................................................................ 18 1.2.1. Male reproductive strategies ................................................................................ 18 1.2.2. Female feeding competition ................................................................................ 19 1.2.3. Competition for safety ...........................................................................................20 1.3. Interaction between feeding competition and predation risk ..............................................21 1.3.1. Non-primates ........................................................................................................22 1.3.2. Primates ................................................................................................................22 1.4. Structure of thesis ...................................................................................................................23 2. BABOONS, PREDATORS AND PREDATION R IS K ......................................................25 2.1. Introduction ...........................................................................................................................25 2.2. Quantifying instantaneous predation r is k ..............................................................................25 2.3. The predators of baboons ..................................................................................................... 27 2.3.1. Candidates ............................................................................................................. 27 2.3.2. Tsaobis
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lamiales – Synoptical Classification Vers
    Lamiales – Synoptical classification vers. 2.6.2 (in prog.) Updated: 12 April, 2016 A Synoptical Classification of the Lamiales Version 2.6.2 (This is a working document) Compiled by Richard Olmstead With the help of: D. Albach, P. Beardsley, D. Bedigian, B. Bremer, P. Cantino, J. Chau, J. L. Clark, B. Drew, P. Garnock- Jones, S. Grose (Heydler), R. Harley, H.-D. Ihlenfeldt, B. Li, L. Lohmann, S. Mathews, L. McDade, K. Müller, E. Norman, N. O’Leary, B. Oxelman, J. Reveal, R. Scotland, J. Smith, D. Tank, E. Tripp, S. Wagstaff, E. Wallander, A. Weber, A. Wolfe, A. Wortley, N. Young, M. Zjhra, and many others [estimated 25 families, 1041 genera, and ca. 21,878 species in Lamiales] The goal of this project is to produce a working infraordinal classification of the Lamiales to genus with information on distribution and species richness. All recognized taxa will be clades; adherence to Linnaean ranks is optional. Synonymy is very incomplete (comprehensive synonymy is not a goal of the project, but could be incorporated). Although I anticipate producing a publishable version of this classification at a future date, my near- term goal is to produce a web-accessible version, which will be available to the public and which will be updated regularly through input from systematists familiar with taxa within the Lamiales. For further information on the project and to provide information for future versions, please contact R. Olmstead via email at [email protected], or by regular mail at: Department of Biology, Box 355325, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • SABONET Report No 18
    ii Quick Guide This book is divided into two sections: the first part provides descriptions of some common trees and shrubs of Botswana, and the second is the complete checklist. The scientific names of the families, genera, and species are arranged alphabetically. Vernacular names are also arranged alphabetically, starting with Setswana and followed by English. Setswana names are separated by a semi-colon from English names. A glossary at the end of the book defines botanical terms used in the text. Species that are listed in the Red Data List for Botswana are indicated by an ® preceding the name. The letters N, SW, and SE indicate the distribution of the species within Botswana according to the Flora zambesiaca geographical regions. Flora zambesiaca regions used in the checklist. Administrative District FZ geographical region Central District SE & N Chobe District N Ghanzi District SW Kgalagadi District SW Kgatleng District SE Kweneng District SW & SE Ngamiland District N North East District N South East District SE Southern District SW & SE N CHOBE DISTRICT NGAMILAND DISTRICT ZIMBABWE NAMIBIA NORTH EAST DISTRICT CENTRAL DISTRICT GHANZI DISTRICT KWENENG DISTRICT KGATLENG KGALAGADI DISTRICT DISTRICT SOUTHERN SOUTH EAST DISTRICT DISTRICT SOUTH AFRICA 0 Kilometres 400 i ii Trees of Botswana: names and distribution Moffat P. Setshogo & Fanie Venter iii Recommended citation format SETSHOGO, M.P. & VENTER, F. 2003. Trees of Botswana: names and distribution. Southern African Botanical Diversity Network Report No. 18. Pretoria. Produced by University of Botswana Herbarium Private Bag UB00704 Gaborone Tel: (267) 355 2602 Fax: (267) 318 5097 E-mail: [email protected] Published by Southern African Botanical Diversity Network (SABONET), c/o National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria and University of Botswana Herbarium, Private Bag UB00704, Gaborone.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Literature Review
    CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Phytosociological syntheses 2.1.1 Introduction A phytosociological synthesis can be described as a study of which the main aim is to compile a synthesis of vegetation information based on phytosociological data collected by various researchers at various times in a particular study area. Large vegetation data sets are generally encountered with in phytosociological syntheses, due to the accumulation of information in the form of vegetation releves. Knowledge on phytosociological syntheses and the treatment of large vegetation data sets are limited in southern Africa. Identification of basic vegetation units still needs attention, lowering general concern of syntheses and vegetation classification on higher ranks. 2.1.2 Previous attempts to treat large vegetation data sets One of the first attempts to analise large phytosociological data sets in South Africa, was the three-step method proposed by Bredenkamp and Bezuidenhout (1995). Winterbach (1998) also performed this method in a synthesis of Acacia-dominated vegetation of the Central Bushveld of South Africa. The three-step method for a phytosociological synthesis of grasslands in South Africa (Bredenkamp & Bezuidenhout 1995) was based on the two-step procedure proposed by Van der Maarel et al. (1987). a) Van der Maarel et aL (1987) The first step of the method of Van der Maarel et al. (1987) is preceded by stratification of the data set. Stratification is suggested either by area (in the case of a large and geographically heterogeneous region), or by vegetation type in the case where all plant communities of an area are covered. Cluster analysis is performed on each stratified unit, resulting in basic clusters (first step).
    [Show full text]
  • A Synoptical Classification of the Lamiales
    Lamiales – Synoptical classification vers. 2.0 (in prog.) Updated: 13 December, 2005 A Synoptical Classification of the Lamiales Version 2.0 (in progress) Compiled by Richard Olmstead With the help of: D. Albach, B. Bremer, P. Cantino, C. dePamphilis, P. Garnock-Jones, R. Harley, L. McDade, E. Norman, B. Oxelman, J. Reveal, R. Scotland, J. Smith, E. Wallander, A. Weber, A. Wolfe, N. Young, M. Zjhra, and others [estimated # species in Lamiales = 22,000] The goal of this project is to produce a working infraordinal classification of the Lamiales to genus with information on distribution and species richness. All recognized taxa will be clades; adherence to Linnaean ranks is optional. Synonymy is very incomplete (comprehensive synonymy is not a goal of the project, but could be incorporated). Although I anticipate producing a publishable version of this classification at a future date, my near-term goal is to produce a web-accessible version, which will be available to the public and which will be updated regularly through input from systematists familiar with taxa within the Lamiales. For further information on the project and to provide information for future versions, please contact R. Olmstead via email at [email protected], or by regular mail at: Department of Biology, Box 355325, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195, USA. Lamiales – Synoptical classification vers. 2.0 (in prog.) Updated: 13 December, 2005 Acanthaceae (~201/3510) Durande, Notions Elém. Bot.: 265. 1782, nom. cons. – Synopsis compiled by R. Scotland & K. Vollesen (Kew Bull. 55: 513-589. 2000); probably should include Avicenniaceae. Nelsonioideae (7/ ) Lindl. ex Pfeiff., Nomencl.
    [Show full text]
  • Using the Checklist N W C
    Using the checklist • The arrangement of the checklist is alphabetical by family followed by genus, grouped under Pteridophyta, Gymnosperms, Monocotyledons and Dicotyledons. • All species and synonyms are arranged alphabetically under genus. • Accepted names are in bold print while synonyms or previously-used names are in italics. • In the case of synonyms, the currently used name follows the equals sign (=), and only refers to usage in Zimbabwe. • Distribution information is included under the current name. • The letters N, W, C, E, and S, following each listed taxon, indicate the known distribution of species within Zimbabwe as reflected by specimens in SRGH or cited in the literature. Where the distribution is unknown, we have inserted Distr.? after the taxon name. • All species known or suspected to be fully naturalised in Zimbabwe are included in the list. They are preceded by an asterisk (*). Species only known from planted or garden specimens were not included. Mozambique Zambia Kariba Mt. Darwin Lake Kariba N Victoria Falls Harare C Nyanga Mts. W Mutare Gweru E Bulawayo GREAT DYKEMasvingo Plumtree S Chimanimani Mts. Botswana N Beit Bridge South Africa The floristic regions of Zimbabwe: Central, East, North, South, West. A checklist of Zimbabwean vascular plants A checklist of Zimbabwean vascular plants edited by Anthony Mapaura & Jonathan Timberlake Southern African Botanical Diversity Network Report No. 33 • 2004 • Recommended citation format MAPAURA, A. & TIMBERLAKE, J. (eds). 2004. A checklist of Zimbabwean vascular plants.
    [Show full text]
  • By CGGJ History. the Publication Of
    Malayan Bignoniaceae, their taxonomy, origin and geographical distribution by C.G.G.J. van Steenis. and will not distribu- Age area do, function of and tion is a age biology. The mechanism of evolution is the main problem of biological science. Introduction. : My publication on the Bignoniaceae of New Guinea ) has been the prime cause to study this family for the whole Malayan region. So this study forms a parallel to the publications of the families worked out by the botanists at Buitenzorg, which are an attempt to constitute a modern review of the Malayan flora. That this a review of family was necessary may appear from short historical a survey. History. Since the publication of „De flora van Neder- landsch Indie” by Miguel 2), only 4 of the 5 Javanese 3 species have been discussed byKoorders and Va 1eton ); 4 Koorders ) gives only a short enumeration of the 5 Java- nese species, together with the cultivated ones of Java. 6 discussed the and Boerlage ) genera gave an account critical dis- of the species known then, but did not give a cussion of the species. 1) Nova-Guinea 14 (1927) 293-303. 2 ) De Flora van Nederlandsch Indie. 2 (1856) 750-9. 8 ) Bijdrage tot de boomsoorten van Java. 1 (1894) 64. 4) Excursionsflora fur Java. 3 (1912) 182. 6 585 ) Handleiding tot de kennis der flora van Ned. Indie. 2 (1899) 788 For the there extra-Javanese species are only the elder works of Blume 1 2 ) and Mique 1 ) and for Deplanchea the descriptions of Scheffer 3). As the and genera species were known only incompletely, the geographical distribution could not be indicated with any certainty and about the affinities was not known much either.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Uses by the Topnaar of the Sesfontein Area (Namib Desert)
    Afrika Focus, Vol. 8, Nr. 3-4, 1922, pp. 253-281 PLANT USES BY THE TOPNAAR OF THE SESFONTEIN AREA (NAMIB DESERT) Patrick VAN DAMME & Veerle VAN DEN EYNDEN & Patrick VERNEMMEN Laboratory for Tropical and Sub-tropical Agronomy and Ethnobotany Faculty of Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences Department of Plant Production Coupure Links, 653 B-9000 Gent BELGIUM 1. Introduction In a previous article (P. Van Damme et al., 1992, this volume) the plant use by the Kuiseb Topnaar was presented and discussed. From December 1991 to June 1992, an ethnobotanical survey was con­ ducted in collaboration with the Topnaar. All Topnaar settlements of the Sesfontein area were visited and all families interviewed. Special emphasis was placed on the older Topnaar, whose plant knowledge is the most exten­ sive. For each plant mentioned, information on its use, the used parts and the preparation and processing method was collected. The plant specimens that could be collected in the field were identified by the authors. Because of extreme drought during this period, some plants could not be found in the field. Some of these could still be identified through literature research, relating them to the vernacular names and the plant descriptions given by the Topnaar. Others however remain unidentified to date. Some people gave information on the use of non-plant material. This information is also included in this article. As this article will show, esfontein Topnaar use some of the plants that the Kuiseb Topnaar use but also refer to plants that are specific to their area. The most important influence for differences between the plant uses in the Kuiseb area and in Sesfontein is the fact that the Sesfontein climate is more humid than the climate in the Namib.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora and Fauna Impact Assessment Report for the Proposed Platreef Underground Mine
    FLORA AND FAUNA IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED PLATREEF UNDERGROUND MINE FOR THE PROPOSED PLATREEF MINING PROJECT PLATREEF RESOURCES (PTY) LTD OCTOBER 2013 _________________________________________________ Digby Wells and Associates (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd (Subsidiary of Digby Wells & Associates (Pty) Ltd). Co. Reg. No. 2010/008 577/07. Fern Isle, Section 10, 359 Pretoria Ave Randburg Private Bag X10046, Randburg, 2125, South Africa Tel: +27 11 789 9495, Fax: +27 11 789 9498, [email protected], www.digbywells.com ________________________________________________ Directors: A Sing*, AR Wilke, LF Koeslag, PD Tanner (British)*, AJ Reynolds (Chairman) (British)*, J Leaver*, GE Trusler (C.E.O) *Non-Executive _________________________________________________ y:\projects\platreef\pla1677_esia\4_submission\esia reports\final_eia_emp\specialist reports\fauna and flora\pla1677_fauna_and_flora_report_20131213_dp.docx Flora and Fauna Impact Assessment Report for the Proposed Platreef Underground Mine PLA1677 This document has been prepared by Digby Wells Environmental. Report Title: Flora and Fauna Impact Assessment Report for the Proposed Platreef Underground Mine Project Number: PLA1677 Name Responsibility Signature Date Rudi Greffrath Report Writer 2013/09/20 Andrew Husted Report Reviewer 2013/09/20 This report is provided solely for the purposes set out in it and may; not, in whole or in part, be used for any other purpose without Digby Wells Environmental prior written consent. ii Flora and Fauna Impact Assessment Report for the Proposed Platreef Underground Mine PLA1677 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Digby Wells Environmental (Digby Wells) was appointed by Platreef Resources (Pty) Ltd for Phase 1 and subsequently Phase 2 of the social and environmental documentation required in support of a Mining Right Application for the proposed Platreef Underground Mine.
    [Show full text]
  • WOOD ANATOMY of the BIGNONIACEAE, WI'ih a COMPARISON of TREES and Llanas
    IAWA Bulletin n.s., Vol. 12 (4),1991: 389-417 WOOD ANATOMY OF THE BIGNONIACEAE, WI'IH A COMPARISON OF TREES AND LlANAS by Peter GBS80n 1 and David R. Dobbins2 Summary The secondary xylem anatomy of trees Hess 1943; Jain & Singh 1980; see also Greg­ and lianas was compared in the family Big­ ory 1980 and in preparation). Den Outer and noniaceae. General descriptions of the family Veenendaal (1983) have compared Bignonia­ and the six woody tribes are provided. Lianas ceae wood anatomy with that of Uncarina belong to the tribes Bignonieae, Tecomeae (Pedaliaceae) and Santos has recently describ­ and Schlegelieae, and most have ve.ssels of ed the New World Tecomeae for an M.S. two distinct diameters, many vessels per unit thesis (Santos 1990) and Flora Neotropica area, large intervascular pits, septate fibres, (Santos in press). large heterocellular rays often of two distinct The family Bignoniaceae has a wide dis­ sizes, scanty paratracheal and vasicentric axial tribution from about 400N to 35°S, encom­ parenchyma and anomalous growth. Conver­ passing North and South America, Africa sely, trees, which belong to the tribes Coleeae, south of the Sahara, Asia, Indonesia, New Crescentieae, Oroxyleae and Tecomeae gen­ Guinea and eastern Australia. It is mainly erally have narrower vessels in one diameter tropical, with most species in northern South class, fewer vessels per unit area, smaller America, and consists of lianas, trees and intervascular pits, non-septate fibres, small shrubs with very few herbs. Estimates of the homocellular rays, scanty paratracheal, ali­ number of genera and species vary: 650 form or confluent parenchyma, and none ex­ species in 120 genera (Willis 1973) or 800 hibits anomalous growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Habitat Survey
    ECOLOGICAL HABITAT SURVEY Proposed Lephalale Railway Yard and Borrow Areas, Lephalale, Limpopo Province, South Africa Boscia albitrunca (Shepherd’s Tree) at the site. Photo: R.F. Terblanche. April 2019 COMPILED BY: Reinier F. Terblanche (M.Sc, Cum Laude; Pr.Sci.Nat, Reg. No. 400244/05) Ecological Habitat Survey: Lephalale Railway Yard April 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 7 2. STUDY AREA ............................................................................................. 8 3. METHODS ................................................................................................... 12 4. RESULTS .................................................................................................... 16 5. DISCUSSION ............................................................................................... 49 6. RISKS, IMPACTS AND MITIGATION ......................................................... 72 7. CONCLUSION ……..................................................................................... 86 8. REFERENCES …......................................................................................... 90 9. ANNEXURE 1: PLANT SPECIES LIST ...................................................... 97 Ecological Habitat Survey: Lephalale Railway Yard April 2019 Report prepared for: Naledzi Environmental Consultants Pty Ltd Postnet Library Gardens Suite 320 Private Bag X 9307 Polokwane 0700 South Africa Report prepared by: Reinier F.
    [Show full text]
  • Bignoniaceae) Based on Molecular and Wood Anatomical Data Marcelo R
    Pace & al. • Phylogenetic relationships of enigmatic Sphingiphila TAXON 65 (5) • October 2016: 1050–1063 Phylogenetic relationships of enigmatic Sphingiphila (Bignoniaceae) based on molecular and wood anatomical data Marcelo R. Pace,1,2 Alexandre R. Zuntini,1,3 Lúcia G. Lohmann1 & Veronica Angyalossy1 1 Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão 277, Cidade Universitária, CEP 05508-090, São Paulo, SP, Brazil 2 Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, MRC 166, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012, U.S.A. 3 Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Rua Monteiro Lobato 255, Barão Geraldo, CEP 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brazil Author for correspondence: Marcelo R. Pace, [email protected], [email protected] ORCID MRP, http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0368-2388; ARZ, http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0705-8902; LGL, http:/orcid.org/ 0000-0003-4960-0587 DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.12705/655.7 Abstract Sphingiphila is a monospecific genus, endemic to the Bolivian and Paraguayan Chaco, a semi-arid lowland region. The circumscription of Sphingiphila has been controversial since the genus was first described. Sphingiphila tetramera is perhaps the most enigmatic taxon of Bignoniaceae due to the presence of very unusual morphological features, such as simple leaves, thorn-tipped branches, and tetramerous, actinomorphic flowers, making its tribal placement within the family uncertain. Here we combined molecular and wood anatomical data to determine the placement of Sphingiphila within the family. The analyses of a large ndhF dataset, which included members of all Bignoniaceae tribes, placed Sphingiphila within Bignonieae.
    [Show full text]
  • People, Plants and Practice in Drylands: Annexe 1
    People, plants and practice in drylands: socio-political and ecological dimensions of resource-use by Damara farmers in north-west Namibia. Annexe 1: Database of Damara ethnobotany. VP Sian Sullivan PhD University College London 1998 Preamble This catalogue of ethnobotanical information with relevance to Damara farmers in north- west Namibia is intended as a source of reference matenal providing underlying detail to the plant resources referred to in the main body of the thesis. It is based primarily on original field data collected through the following: . interviews at households in Khowanb in (1992), Sesfontein and at settlements on the Ugab River (1994) (52 interviews in 4total); • extensive small-group discussion at repeat-visits to 12 households who participated in a wider survey concerned with monitoring household use of natural resources. In this case, 228 fieldcards prepared from plant specimens collected by the author were used as the basis for discussion. The Damara 'nation' to which respondents described themselves as belonging was recorded to try and elucidate dialectical and use differences; in many cases this is specified alongside information on names and uses of plants listed in this database (see Map 1.1 in the main text of the thesis); • finally, ethnobotanical information was recorded opportunistically during collecting trips with Damara resource-users. For each species in the catalogue the Damara name is listed followed by uses for food, medicine, perfume, livestock forage and 'other' including household utensils, building materials and firewood. Each category is supported by literature references for Nama/Damara people where these could be found. This is followed by plant names and uses recorded for Herero/Himba herders who live in close proximity with the Damara in north-west Namibia Literature references to the use of the species in dryfands elsewhere are then recorded.
    [Show full text]