DOCSLIB.ORG

Judgement Delivered On: 31 March 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Judgement Delivered On: 31 March 2016 IT-03-67-T 143/62540 BIS D143-1/62540 BIS 14 June 2016 MB UNITED NATIONS Case No.: IT-03-67-T International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations Date: 31 March 2016 of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former FRENCH Yugoslavia since 1991 Original: English IN TRIAL CHAMBER III Before: Judge Jean-Claude Antonetti, Presiding Judge Mandiaye Niang Judge Flavia Lattanzi Registrar: Mr John Hocking Judgement delivered on: 31 March 2016 THE PROSECUTOR v. Vojislav Šešelj PUBLIC JUDGEMENT Volume 1 Office of the Prosecutor: Mathias Marcussen Accused: Vojislav Šešelj 142/62540 BIS I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 4 II. MATTERS RELATING TO THE EVIDENCE ...................................................................... 10 A. EXCERPTS FROM THE ACCUSED ’S PUBLICATIONS ....................................................................... 10 B. UNRELIABLE TESTIMONY ............................................................................................................ 10 C. PREVIOUS STATEMENTS OF “RECANTING ” WITNESSES ................................................................ 10 D. EVIDENCE RELATING TO A CONSISTENT PATTERN OF CONDUCT .................................................. 11 E. EVIDENCE STEMMING FROM OTHER CASES .................................................................................. 12 III. THE GENERAL CONTEXT OF THE EVENTS COVERED BY THE INDICTMENT . 13 A. THE PROCESS OF DISINTEGRATION OF THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA .............................................. 13 1. The SFRY and Serbia ............................................................................................................ 13 2. Croatia and Slovenia .............................................................................................................. 13 3. BiH ......................................................................................................................................... 14 B. POLITICAL PARTIES FOUNDED BY THE ACCUSED ........................................................................ 17 C. THE ARMED FORCES IN THE SFRY AND FRY ............................................................................. 20 1. At the Yugoslav federal level ................................................................................................ 20 (a) The JNA and the Army of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (“VJ”) ................................. 21 (b) The forces of the MUP ........................................................................................................... 22 (c) The Territorial Defence (TO) ................................................................................................. 22 2. The Yugoslav and regional armed forces in Croatia ............................................................. 23 3. The evolution of the JNA and the TO in Croatia ................................................................... 24 4. The Yugoslav and regional armed forces in BiH................................................................... 25 (a) The JNA and the TO .............................................................................................................. 25 (b) The VRS ................................................................................................................................. 26 (c) Forces of the MUP ................................................................................................................. 27 D. SERBIAN PARAMILITARY FORCES ............................................................................................... 28 1. Volunteers of the SRS/S ČP ................................................................................................... 29 (a) Definition of the expression “Šešelj’s men” .......................................................................... 29 (b) The recruitment and deployment of SRS volunteers ............................................................. 29 (c) Hierarchical link between the volunteers and the Accused .................................................... 31 (d) Financing of the SRS volunteers ............................................................................................ 32 2. The Serbian paramilitary groups present in the municipalities covered by the Indictment ... 32 a. “Arkan’s Tigers”/ “Arkan’s Volunteers” ........................................................................ 32 b. The “White Eagles” and the “Dušan Silni” Detachment, paramilitary groups affiliated with the SNO ................................................................................................................ 34 c. The “Red Berets” of the DB of Serbia ............................................................................ 35 d. The “Yellow Wasps” ....................................................................................................... 36 e. The “Leva Supoderica” Detachment ............................................................................... 38 f. The unit of Vasilije Vidovi ć, aka “Vaske”....................................................................... 39 g. The units of Pivarski and Niški ....................................................................................... 40 h. Gogi ć’s unit / the Loznica group ..................................................................................... 40 i. The “Kara đor đe” unit ....................................................................................................... 41 j. The “Serbian Guard” of the SPO ..................................................................................... 42 k. The units of Branislav Gavrilovi ć, aka “Brne”, and of Slavko Aleksi ć ......................... 43 l. The “ Vladan Luki ć” and “ Dragi Lazarevi ć” volunteer detachments ............................... 44 IV. THE CRIMES ............................................................................................................................ 46 A. PRELIMINARY REMARKS ............................................................................................................. 46 1. Meaning of the expression “ethnic cleansing”....................................................................... 46 2. The “Serbian forces”, perpetrators of the crimes ................................................................... 46 B. ARTICLE 5 OF THE STATUTE : CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY ......................................................... 46 1 Case No: IT-03-67-T 31 March 2016 141/62540 BIS C. VIOLATIONS OF LAWS OR CUSTOMS OF WAR ............................................................................... 50 1. Requirements under Article 3 of the Statute .......................................................................... 50 2. War crimes not alleged in the Indictment .............................................................................. 51 3. Alleged war crimes for which there is insufficient evidence ................................................. 52 4. Alleged war crimes established by the Chamber ................................................................... 55 (a) Vukovar municipality ............................................................................................................. 55 (b) Zvornik municipality .............................................................................................................. 57 (c) Greater Sarajevo ..................................................................................................................... 60 (d) Mostar municipality ............................................................................................................... 61 (e) Nevesinje municipality ........................................................................................................... 63 V. CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ACCUSED .......................................................... 66 A. INDIVIDUAL CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 7 (1) OF THE STATUTE FOR THE COMMISSION OF A CRIME .................................................................................................. 66 1. Commission through a Joint Criminal Enterprise .................................................................. 66 (a) Allegations and submissions of the Parties ............................................................................ 66 (b) Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 67 (i) On the allegation of a common purpose ............................................................................. 67 a. Proclamation of Serbian autonomous regions ................................................................. 70 b. Enlistment and deployment of volunteers ....................................................................... 72 c. The covert arming of Serbian civilians ............................................................................ 75 d. The commission of crimes in the field ............................................................................ 76 (ii) On the allegations of a plurality of persons sharing the same views ................................ 76 (c) Finding ................................................................................................................................... 87 2. Physical perpetration
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Airac Aip Amdt
    SRBIJA / CRNA GORA AIRAC AIP SERBIA / MONTENEGRO KONTROLA LETENJA SRBIJE I CRNE GORE SMATSA doo BEOGRAD / AMDT SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES SMATSA llc 6/21 SLUŽBA ZA VAZDUHOPLOVNO INFORMISANJE / AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICE Trg Nikole Pašića 10, P.B. 640, 11000 Beograd, Serbia, AFS: LYBBYOYX 6 MAY TEL: + 381 11 321 8056, 321 8051 FAX: + 381 11 324 0456 e-mail: [email protected] Stupa na snagu / Effective Date 17 JUN 21 1. Sadržaj 1. Contents 1.1 Lokacijski indikator: LYEV – Uvođenje 1.1 Location indicator: LYEV – Introduction 1.2 AD BEOGRAD/Nikola Tesla: Parking pozicije – Izmene 1.2 BEOGRAD/Nikola Tesla AD: ACFT stands – Changes (prethodno objavljeno NOTAM-ima) (previously published by NOTAM) 1.3 AD BEOGRAD/Nikola Tesla: Navigacioni postupci – 1.3 BEOGRAD/Nikola Tesla AD: Navigation procedures – Izmene Changes 1.4 Uređivačke izmene 1.4 Editorial changes 2. Uklonite sledeće stranice 17 JUN 21 / 3. Uložite sledeće stranice 17 JUN 21 / On 17 JUN 21 remove the following pages: On 17 JUN 21 insert the following pages: GEN 0.2–1/2 20 MAY 21 GEN 0.2–1/2 17 JUN 21 GEN 0.4–1/6 20 MAY 21 GEN 0.4–1/6 17 JUN 21 GEN 0.5–1/2 20 MAY 21 GEN 0.5–1/2 17 JUN 21 GEN 2.4–1/2 28 JAN 21 GEN 2.4–1/2 17 JUN 21 GEN 3.2–11/14 20 MAY 21 GEN 3.2–11/14 17 JUN 21 GEN 3.2–15/16 22 APR 21 GEN 3.2–15/16 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 2.1–1/2 25 MAR 21 AD 2 LYBE 2.1–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 2.2–1/2 25 MAR 21 AD 2 LYBE 2.2–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 6.2–1/2 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 6.2–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 6.2–5/6 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 6.2–5/6 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 6.4–1/2 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 6.4–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 6.4–5/6 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 6.4–5/6 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 6.5–1/2 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 6.5–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 6.5–5/6 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 6.5–5/6 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.1–1/2 28 JAN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.1–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.1–5/6 28 JAN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.1–5/6 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.2–1/2 28 JAN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.2–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.2–5/6 28 JAN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.2–5/6 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 9.1–1/2 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 9.1–1/2 17 JUN 21 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The War in Bosnia and Herzegovina Or the Unacceptable Lightness of “Historicism”
    The War in Bosnia and Herzegovina Or the Unacceptable Lightness of “Historicism” Davor Marijan War Museum, Zagreb, Republic of Croatia Abstract The author in this study does not intend to provide a comprehensive account of the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, in part because the cur- rent level of research does not enable this. The only way to understand this conflict is through facts, not prejudices. However, such prejudices are particularly acute amongst Muslim-Bosniac authors. They base their claims on the notion that Serbs and Croats are the destroyers of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and that both are equally culpable in its destruction. Relying on mainly unpublished and uncited documents from the three constitutive nations of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the author factually chal- lenges basic and generally accepted claims. The author offers alternative responses to certain claims and draws attention to the complexity of the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which has been mainly viewed in terms of black or white. The author does, however, suggest that in considering the character of the war it is necessary to examine first the war in Croatia and the inter-relationship between the two. The main focus is on 1992 and the Muslim and Croat differences that developed into open conflict at the beginning of 1993. The role of the international community in the war and the partition of Bosnia and Herzegovina are also discussed. At the end of the 20th century in Europe and the eclipse of Communism from the world political scene, it is not easy to trace the indelible marks left behind after the collapse of Yugoslavia and the wars that ensued.
    [Show full text]
  • The Yugoslav National Army Role in the Aggression Against the Republic of Croatia from 1990 to 1992
    The Yugoslav National Army Role in the Aggression Against the Republic of Croatia from 1990 to 1992 Davor Marijan ABSTRACT The essay analyses the role of the Yugoslav National Army (JNA) in the war waged against Croatia from 1990 to 1992. The author draws atten - tion to the fact that from the end of the 1980s, the JNA was an active party to the Serbian expansionist aspirations that gripped Yugoslavia after Titos death. The Armys role is chronicled from the point of Croatias democratisation in 1990 to its retreat in the spring of 1992, after having only partially executed the tasks that Serbian expansionist policy had dele- gated. Following the death of Josip Broz Tito in 1980, the Socialist Federative Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY) entered the crisis-ridden 1980s. This decade was marked by incidents in Kosovo in 1981 and 1989, chronic economic crisis, and a rise in Serbian expan- sionist nationalism directed towards the federal state, which had been defined and formally adopted with the enactment of the 1974 Constitution. The Yugoslav National Armys involvement served to show that Serbian expansionist ideas had deeply affect- ed even that institution, in which Serbs dominated1, and which had *All afore-mentioned documents, unless otherwise specified, can be found in the pos- session of the Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Croatia. 1. Am omni-present characteristic of the Yugoslav National Army during the entire course of its existence is the uneven structure of national representation in its com- missioned officers corps, particularly among generals and higher ranking officer personnel. Prior to the war, Croatians in percentages comprised 12.6% of the Army population, which when compared with their representation in SFRYs population 143 NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE FUTURE 3-4 (2) 2001, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Raspored I Rezultati Utakmica
    RASPORED I REZULTATI UTAKMICA NEDELJA, 23.12.2018. STARIJI VETERANI 23.12.2018. 16:00 NAŠA KUJNA (SR. MITROVICA) 2:4 RESPEKT (SR. MITROVICA) NEDELJA, 23.12.2018. MLAĐI VETERANI 23.12.2018. 17:00 GARNIZON (SR. MITROVICA) 6:2 FK POLETARAC ( LAĆARAK) NEDELJA, 23.12.2018. SENIORI 23.12.2018. 18:00 VAHALI (ZASAVICA 2) 5:1 OZREN NAMEŠTAJ (VOGANJ) 23.12.2018. 19:00 ASTERIX TODOR (SR. MITROVICA) 2:8 MAX BET (SR. MITROVICA) 23.12.2018. 20:00 I–CARGO (SR. MITROVICA) 4:2 FK PLANINAC (LEŽIMIR) PONEDELJAK, 24.12.2018. PIONIRI 24.12.2018. 10:00 FK LSK (LAĆARAK) 0:2 EKONOMIK IMPEX (SR. MITROVICA) PONEDELJAK, 24.12.2018. KADETI 24.12.2018. 10:45 FK BORAC (MARTINCI) 1:10 PAUN (SR. MITROVICA) POSLOVNO-SPORTSKI CENTAR PINKI 22000 Sremska Mitrovica, Svetog Dimitrija 36, +381 22 611 555 www.pscpinki.org.rs PONEDELJAK, 24.12.2018. OMLADINCI 24.12.2018. 11:45 FK MITROS (SR. MITROVICA) 2:7 REKREATIVO (SR. MITROVICA) 222 24.12.2018. 12:45 ZLATNI KLAS (SR. MITROVICA) 2:5 OKTAGON BET (SR. MITROVICA) 24.12.2018. 16:00 BAVET FISH CORP (KUZMIN) 4:7 FERUM (ŠID) PONEDELJAK, 24.12.2018. SENIORI 24.12.2018. 17:00 POLICIJSKA UPRAVA (SR.MITROVICA) 13:4 FK SLOBODA (ŠAŠINCI) 24.12.2018. 18:00 JKP KOMUNALIJE (SR. MITROVICA) 5:2 STEFAN I DRUGARI (MANĐELOS) 24.12.2018. 19:00 EKIPA BEZ BRIGE (SR. MITROVICA) 7:1 ZEKA BULJUBAŠA (RAVNJE) 24.12.2018. 20:00 FK BUDUĆNOST (SALAŠ NOĆAJSKI) 3:9 LAKI SPIN (SR. MITROVICA) UTORAK, 25.12.2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Sb ¡20)0 Conseil De L’Europe ^ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ COE273160 ★ ★ ★★ ★
    io') Council of Europe Sb ¡20)0 Conseil de l’Europe ^ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ COE273160 ★ ★ ★★ ★ Strasbourg, 21 June 1996 Restricted Ì <s:\cdISdoc496)NcdI\54.pdg> CDL (96) 54 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT COUNTRY REPORTS ON HUMAN RIGHTS PRACTICES FOR 1995 l "Sii :- ''ferfai 'ACCORDANCE' WITH "sEC,n6NS^lI6C(ìi';AND 5023(b)\OF THE * -.' -0 'Ä. FOREIGN' ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1961. AS AMENDED ;•;■ > -V -'•■'ir'-• ; • Î.V.Î-. -:-Ад '•-A.- *.V4 '; : * . * * • *Л • \ »...ísV . .... -V? »V...... > r ' i-m ••. - / •* к .. Iя»»- • •- 'c' *•* ■ •' .4..• * •**,: •*» «' - *.< • •• - • *. • ‘,:1. *.i . _ _ ____ . 2. ............ •.»» i• A.* .d-«kis »M4* . •* ,'•» Y^. T-Vr.Î-Æ4/0Âîi^:UvVi?;»^^4"£:^>«^^ -№'i- ' j: • ’^"Rrintea'f for".tiie:.’use ;of fheixCönïmitfcees; òn *Inter2atio¿ál';,'.Re.Iatíona ¿?r »«£:• ‘i^Eouse. of. Reàresèntànves. 'ani:- Foreign ^Relations •• of. the .U.S.; Senaiijire-J^ ,-. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA The Republic of Bosnia ana Herzegovina was formed from one of six constituent republics of the^ former Yugoslavia. Citizens endorsed independence in a 1992 ref­ erendum. President Alija Izetbegovic heads the multiethnic collective presidency of a parliamentary democratic government elected in 1990. Within days'of independ­ ence, Serbian nationalist militias, supported by elements of the former Yugoslav na­ tional army (JNA), launched attacks throughout northern and eastern Bosnia, and Serbian Democratic Party (SDS) leader Radovan Karadzic declared the establish ­ ment of the “Republika Sroska ” or “Serb Republic.” Seventy percent of the Bosnian Republic remained under Serbian occupation until the Bosnian government and Croatian offensives in August. During 4 years of war an estimated 263,000 people were killed, and two-thirds of the country's prewar pop­ ulation of 4 Vi million was uprooted and dispersed as either refugees or displaced persons.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:10-Cv-05197 Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 40
    Case 1:10-cv-05197 Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 40 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION GENOCIDE VICTIMS ) OF KRAJINA, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No.: 1:10-CV- _____ ) L-3 COMMUNICATIONS ) Corp. and ) MPRI, Inc., ) JURY DEMAND ) Class Action ) Defendants. ) ) COMPLAINT Plaintiffs Genocide Victims of Krajina, including Milena Jovic and Zivka Mijic, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, for their Complaint against Defendants L-3 Communications Corp. (“L-3”) and MPRI, Inc. (“MPRI”), allege the following: Nature of the Action 1. This is a class action brought by ethnic Serbs who resided in the Krajina region of Croatia up to August 1995 and who then became victims of the Croatian military assault known as Operation Storm—an aggressive, systematic military attack and bombardment on a demilitarized civilian population that had been placed under the protection of the United Nations. Operation Storm was designed to kill or forcibly expel the ethnic Serbian residents of the Krajina region -1- Case 1:10-cv-05197 Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 2 of 40 from Croatian territory, just because they were a minority religio-ethnic group. Defendant MPRI, a private military contractor subsequently acquired by Defendant L-3 Communications Inc., trained and equipped the Croatian military for Operation Storm and designed the Operation Storm battle plan. Operation Storm became the largest land offensive in Europe since World War II and resulted in the murder and inhumane treatment of thousands of ethnic Serbs, the forced displacement of approximately 200,000 ethnic Serbs from their ancestral homes in Croatian territory, and the pillaging and destruction of hundreds of millions of dollars worth of Serbian-owned property.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom House, Its Academic Advisers, and the Author(S) of This Report
    Croatia by Tena Prelec Capital: Zagreb Population: 4.17 million GNI/capita, PPP: $22,880 Source: World Bank World Development Indicators. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores NIT Edition 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 National Democratic 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.75 Governance Electoral Process 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3 3 3 Civil Society 2.75 2.75 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 Independent Media 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4.25 4.25 Local Democratic 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 Governance Judicial Framework 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 and Independence Corruption 4.5 4.5 4.25 4 4 4 4 4.25 4.25 4.25 Democracy Score 3.71 3.71 3,64 3.61 3.61 3.68 3.68 3.68 3.71 3.75 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s). The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest. The Democracy Score is an average of ratings for the categories tracked in a given year.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Aspects of the Croatian Community of Herceg-Bosna
    Book review Miljenko Brekalo (Croatia) Institute of Social Sciences Ivo Pilar – Local center Osijek CONSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS OF THE CROATIAN COMMUNITY OF HERCEG-BOSNA Abstract The political context in which the Croatian Community of Herceg-Bosna came to be was defined by two political moments – an expressed desire of the Serbian people to join Great Serbia on the one hand and the Muslim (Bosnian) attempt to create a concept of a unified BiH where an ethnic-territorial Bosnian majority would be present on the other. In such circumstances, the official policy of the Republic of Croatia, especially the one by the first president dr. Franjo Tuđman, was unfoundedly prescribed by the Great Serbia policy and Bosnian fundamentalism with a basic thesis that he, along with Milošević, “divided” Bosnia and Herzegovina on meetings in Karađorđevo and Tikveš. However, that thesis is rebuttable on two bases. Firstly, the carriers for the idea of Great Serbia with Milošević were “armed to the neck” by the military arsenal of the JNA. Secondly, the democratic rule in Croatia with Tuđman at its forefront was very poorly armed, forced to buy very expensive weaponry on the “black market”: According to this, Milošević needed no military-political agreement on BiH. At that time, the fall of Vukovar and the occupation of one third of the national territory of Croatia point to the fact that there is no basis for the thesis on the “division” of BiH between Tuđman and Milošević. In order to better grasp the constitutional aspects of the Croatian Community of Herceg-Bosna i.e. its creation, existence and disappearance, this paper will show the legal analysis and portray the content of the book by the constitutional judge dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods of Multicriteria Analysis Used in the Initiation Process of Land Consolidation Projects
    METHODS OF MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS USED IN THE INITIATION PROCESS OF LAND CONSOLIDATION PROJECTS МЕТОДE ВИШЕКРИТЕРИЈУМСКЕ АНАЛИЗЕ У ПРОЦЕСУ ИНИЦИРАЊА КОМАСАЦИОНИХ ПРОЈЕКАТА Jelena Lazić 1 Goran Marinković2 Milan Trifković3 UDK: 528.4:519.8 Žarko Nestorović 4 DOI: 10.14415/zbornikGFS33.006 Ilija Grgić 5 CC-BY-SA 4.0 license Summary: The choice of a cadastral Резиме: Решавање проблема избо- municipality for agricultural land ра катастарске општине за уређење management by land consolidation is a пољопривредног земљишта комаса- task set upon every local self- цијом представља задатак који се management unit where projecting and ставља пред сваку јединицу локалне realization of land consolidation pro- самоуправе у којој се планира про- jects are planned. It is very important to јектовање и реализација комасаци- perform the prioritization of specific оних пројеката. Веома је важно да се cadastral municipalities for land давање приоритета појединим катас- management via land consolidation on тарским општинама за уређење a regular and objective manner, i.e. not пољопривредног земљишта комаса- to perform the launching of land цијом врши на коректан и објективан consolidation projects randomly, but to начин, односно да се покретање choose areas where the effects of land комасационих пројеката не врши consolidation would be the greatest. стихијски, већ тамо где би ефекти Solving of this problem is portrayed in комасације били највећи. Решавање the appliance of multicriteria optimi- овог проблема огледа се у примени zation method. Accordingly, this paper метода вишекритеријумске оптимиза- covers the issue of ranking cadastral ције. У складу са тим, у раду је municipalities for agricultural land обрађена проблематика рангирања management by applying different катастарских општина за уређење multicriteria analysis methods and пољопривредног земљишта комаса- presents the evaluation of the defined цијом применом различитих метода model in the Municipality of Ruma.
    [Show full text]
  • 0P[Tina Pe]Inci
    OP[TINA RUMA PLAN GENERALNE REGULACIJE NASEQENOG MESTA NIKINCI Decembar, 2011. godine JAVNO URBANISTI^KO PREDUZE]E "PLAN" OP[TINA RUMA I PE]INCI PLAN GENERALNE REGULACIJE NASEQENOG MESTA NIKINCI NARU^ILAC IZRADE PLANA : OP[TINA RUMA Nosilac izrade plana: JUP “PLAN” RUMA DIREKTOR JUP "PLAN" RUMA : TATJANA MARKOVI], dipl. pravnik Odgovorni urbanista: SWE@ANA GVOI], dipl. in`.arh. Saradnici: BIQANA MILUTINOVI] dipl.in`.arh PETAR \URI^I], dipl.in`.el. MARIJANA ^APO dipl.in`.arh. DRAGAN FILIPOVI], dipl. in`.gra|. JOVAN CVEJI], in`. geod. DRAGAN SIMI] , in`. geod. Ruma, Decembar, 2011. godine - 2 - PLAN GENERALNE REGULACIJE NASEQENOG MESTA NIKINCI SADR@I : N˚ UVOD TEKSTUALNI DEO 1.) PRAVNI OSNOV ZA IZRADU PLANA……………………………………………………..6 2.) POLAZNE OSNOVE PLANA ………………………………………………………………….6 2.1) IZVOD IZ TEKSTUALNOG DELA KONCEPTA PLANA .............................. 6 2.1.1 OPIS PREDLOGA GRANICE PODRU^JA OBUHVA]ENOG PLANOM …………6 2.1.2 PODACI I DOKUMENTACIJA OD ZNA^AJA ZA IZRADU PLANOM ……… 8 a) PLANSKA DOKUMENTACIJA OD UTICAJA NA PODRU^JE OBUHVATA PLANA b) POLO@AJ, KARAKTERISTIKE, ULOGE I ODNOS PODRU^JA PLANA SA OKRU@EWEM Polo`aj naseqa Stanovni{tvo 2.1.3 ANALIZA I PRIKAZ STAWA PRIRODNIH I STVORENIH VREDNOSTI U PROSTORU OBUHVATA PLANA………………………………………………………………10 a) PRIRODNE KARAKTERISTIKE PROSTORA b) STVORENE VREDNOSTI U PODRU^JU PLANA : Osvrt na istorijski razvoj i kulturno nasle|e Prete`na namena prostora sa karakteristikama parcelacije postoje}ih izgra|enih objekata Mre`a naseqske infrastrukture Vaspitawe i obrazovawe Zdravstvo Kultura Sport i rekreacija Trgovina Privreda Komunalne delatnosti 2.1.4 OCENA STAWA U KONTEKSTU RAZVOJNIH MOGU]NOSTI I IZRADE KONCEPTA ZA IZRADU PLANA GENERALNE REGULACIJE NASEQENOG MESTA NIKINCI ……………..14 2.1.5 KONCEPCIJA RAZVOJA, ZA[TITE I URE\EWA PROSTORA a) PRETE@NE NAMENE POVR[INA b) PLANIRANE TRASE SAOBRA]AJNICA I KOMUNALNE INFRASTRUKTURE 2.2) GRAFI^KI PRILOZI USVOJENOG KONCEPTA PLANA - A3 format ….
    [Show full text]
  • The PE EPS Environmental Report for 2015
    Environmental Protection Electric Power Industry of Serbia 2015 Environmental Report Belgrade, April 2016 PE Electric Power Industry of Serbia Environmental Protection INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................................................................................6 1. COAL AND ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................7 1.1 PE EPS COAL PRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................7 1.2 PE EPS ELECTRICITY GENERATION ........................................................................................................................................7 1.3 FUEL CONSUMPTION AND HAZARDOUS AND HARMFUL SUBSTANCES AIR EMISSION FROM PE EPS TPPS ..................................8 1.4 PE EPS WORK INJURIES ......................................................................................................................................................10 1.5 PE EPS HEALTH ..................................................................................................................................................................10 2. KOLUBARA MINING BASIN BRANCH ......................................................................................................................................12 A KOLUBARA MB – OPEN CAST MINES
    [Show full text]
  • Slobodan MILOSEVIC
    IT-02-54-T p.370i7 j)3)",j--1>'~,s-Jsf-­ 2~ ..)I.o(.l~ 7.,'( THE ,INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL· FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA CASE NO.]T·02·54·T THE PROSECUTOR OF.THE TRIBUNAL AGAINST SLOBODANMILOSEVIC SECOND AMENDED INDICTMENT . 'i,.-I";·",; " Tht?,prqs~~tl,tor,pf.'!J1~.: lnt~mational Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, pursuant to lIer authority under Article 18 of the Statute of the,.:Wte.w,!-~ipJ1,".gq¥¥nal,Tribunal for the Fonner. Yugoslavia ("the Statute ofthe Tribunal") charges: . f· SLOBODAN MILOSEVIC" with CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, GRAVE BREACHES OF THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS, anq"VIQLAJ'~QNSi'\OF THE LAWS OR CUSTOMS OF WAR as setforth b~Io~:' .,.....' ." . .'-,~ THE ACCUSED: ",,~,,',,;\:.'.~,::qf~';>i;,<·::·,:~,"(-<\''-::''';)~,f.";{~(,::;,':, '",,:._:',:,,_,~ .;, ,_.~\_,,:-::~,;;;, ~;'<,' 1. .....' SJ,o'bO~MItOSEVI<;",sqn. of~vetoz;fU" ,Milosey~c,.':Vasbom on 2,Q,'f\»g4sti.J94l.iIl" :£>gz~evaq,jQipresfmkda~"Serbia~ ,,'In j964~,h~ ""'",,,,,~. ;;,:":"",,,,::t:.n-"'_'>-:~'.-,_.;,:i!·.\'.·' __ ':"~)';~":""'.'.""'" .,. '.' .. j-....'.' ...••' '" "".,' _'. ' ..• -' .•',.' ." .. , ...... ,., ,,',\ ", "'."'" gI;~~atedfrdm th~~<:l;W F"sulty, of the University of. B,el~ade. and began a career in management and batiking. Until 1978,~eI1eld·the'p()stsOf deputy director and later;g,eqeral< $f~~tOJ;",fit:rehnogits; arrlitjor oil company in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia ("SPRY"). 1'llereaft~~fHr p,~~e pr,~§idtWtof'1J.~l?8r,a(ls~kaplcq (B,~l!.~Clf1,ka,~"Q,pe,Of., thelarg~st\bap,lfsm th~. SF?}X, aIJ9~~~e ~~l? ~t~l,:,l?~3,·" . ',_ ,'-':: >: ,:: J:~<, < ,I.:,:" ~::'-:: ',)j~i".') '\,••i "~{'" ';;,/,~,~> :"~: "",~ <,.iJ (;,"<,'."'l,',., \ .. ,/,; 2~ Slobodan MILOSEVIC joined' the League of Communists of Yugoslavia in 1959. In 1984, he beCame Chairman of the City Colllpljttee.of.the.League\of'Commtlnists ·ofBelgiade.In 1986, he was electedthait.Inan of the Presidium of the Central Committee of the IT-02-54-T p.37016 League ofCommunists of Serbia and was re-electedin 1988.
    [Show full text]