The Trophic Ecology of Coral Reef Sponges in Caribbean Mesophotic Ecosystems

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Trophic Ecology of Coral Reef Sponges in Caribbean Mesophotic Ecosystems University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Fall 2020 The Trophic Ecology of Coral Reef Sponges in Caribbean Mesophotic Ecosystems Keir John Macartney University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation Macartney, Keir John, "The Trophic Ecology of Coral Reef Sponges in Caribbean Mesophotic Ecosystems" (2020). Doctoral Dissertations. 2531. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/2531 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Trophic Ecology of Coral Reef Sponges in Caribbean Mesophotic Ecosystems BY Keir J. Macartney Bachelor of Marine Biology (Honours), University of St Andrews, 2016 DISSERTATION Submitted to the University of New Hampshire in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Molecular and Evolutionary Systems Biology September 2020 i This dissertation was examined and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Ph.D. in Molecular and Evolutionary Systems Biology by: Dissertation Director, Michael P. Lesser, Ph.D., Research Professor Emeritus, Molecular, Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of New Hampshire Marc Slattery, Ph.D., Professor, Pharmacognosy and Environmental Toxicology in BioMolecular Sciences, University of Mississippi Winsor Watson III, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus, Biological Sciences, University of New Hampshire David Plachetzki, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Molecular, Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of New Hampshire Stephen H. Jones, Ph.D., Associate Research Professor, Natural Resources and the Environment University of New Hampshire On August 21, 2020 Approval signatures are on file with the University of New Hampshire Graduate School. ii Dedication I would like to dedicate this work to my family. Your unrelenting support and encouragement towards my passion for marine biology put me firmly on the path to this moment. I could not have completed this work without you. iii Acknowledgements First, I want to thank my advisor, Dr. Michael Lesser, for his unwavering guidance and patience during my four years at UNH. I was as green as they come when I arrived at UNH to begin my graduate studies, but your support helped guide me through the many challenges that came up. None of this would have been possible without your Jedi-like wisdom. I would also like to thank my co-advisor, Dr. Marc Slattery, for his guidance on fieldwork and writing. The challenging questions you asked me about my work helped me think more critically about many topics. I would also like to thank the other members of my dissertation committee; Dr. Windsor Watson, Dr. David Plachetzki, Dr. Stephen Jones and Dr. Marianne Litvaitus. I appreciate the wisdom and advice you provided during meetings and for your comments on my work. I would like to thank the many other faculty members, postdoctoral researchers and UNH students who helped me with analyses and field work. To Dr. Deborah Gochfeld and Dr. Andia Chavez, thank you for your continued assistance during the many trips to the field and for your assistance in the wet laboratory. To Dr. Kathleen Morrow, thank you very much for your comments on many of my early presentations for conferences and showing me the ropes in laboratory. Thank you to Dr. M. Sabrina Pankey, for your extreme patience with the vast number of questions I had about molecular and statistical analyses, your continued support in all thing’s laboratory related and for the many helpful comments you have given me on manuscripts or presentations. Thank you to Liz Kintzing for keeping an eye on me during the many technical dives required for this dissertation and for fixing the many problems that cropped up in my CCR unit while we were in the field. Thank you to Amelia Clayshute for her tireless work on the proximate biochemical compositions of sponges. Thank you to Derek Rothenheber, Nate Ennis, Cooper Park, Devon O’Rourke for giving me advice on bioinformatic analyses. I would like to thank Meghan Hartwick for her help in navigating the fine points of formatting this dissertation and her advice on statistical methods. Thank you to Alaina Weinheimer for her continued patience with my endless questions about bioinformatics and the many scripts she helped me write. You kept me sane during the writing of this dissertation. Thanks to Matt Strobel, Jacob Koile and Jon Streter for cracking a couple of cold ones open with me when I needed a morale boost. I also want to thank the scientists at Mote Marine Laboratory and the University of St Andrews. In particular, thank you to Dr. Erinn Muller and Prof. Christopher Todd for inspiring me to pursue a graduate degree in this field. Lastly, I would also like to thank my family. To my Dad, thank you for all you have done to support me throughout the last few years. To my brother and sister, thanks for taking the time to encourage me when I was struggling. Without the love and support from my family this would not have been possible. All sample collections complied with the laws of the Cayman Islands and the United States of America. Support was provided by NSF Biological Oceanography (OCE– 1632348/1632333), NOAA NIUST (14U752) and the University of New Hampshire Marine Biology Small Grants fund. iv Table of Contents Dedication ..................................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................... iv Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................... v List of Tables .............................................................................................................................. viii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... ix Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... xi Chapter 1 ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 3 Materials and methods.............................................................................................................. 6 Bulk stable isotope analysis ..................................................................................................... 7 Compound specific isotope analysis of amino acids ............................................................... 7 Statistical analyses .................................................................................................................. 8 Results ...................................................................................................................................... 10 Sponge environment and survey results ................................................................................ 10 Bulk stable isotope analyses: ................................................................................................. 12 Compound specific isotope analyses of amino acids............................................................. 16 Discussion ................................................................................................................................. 21 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................. 29 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. 30 Literature Cited ....................................................................................................................... 31 Appendix 1 ................................................................................................................................... 40 Supplemental Information on Compound Specific Isotopic Analysis of Amino Acids (CSIA-AA)................................................................................................................................ 41 Justification for Assumptions Made in the SIAR4 Models ................................................. 42 Source Data for Bulk SIA and CSIA SIAR4 Models ........................................................... 46 Appendix References............................................................................................................... 48 Chapter 2 ..................................................................................................................................... 51 Abstract ...................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Reef Sponges of the Genus Agelas (Porifera: Demospongiae) from the Greater Caribbean
    Zootaxa 3794 (3): 301–343 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3794.3.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:51852298-F299-4392-9C89-A6FD14D3E1D0 Reef sponges of the genus Agelas (Porifera: Demospongiae) from the Greater Caribbean FERNANDO J. PARRA-VELANDIA1,2, SVEN ZEA2,4 & ROB W. M. VAN SOEST3 1St John's Island Marine Laboratory, Tropical Marine Science Institute (TMSI), National University of Singapore, 18 Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119227. E-mail: [email protected] 2Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Caribe, Centro de Estudios en Ciencias del Mar—CECIMAR; c/o INVEMAR, Calle 25 2- 55, Rodadero Sur, Playa Salguero, Santa Marta, Colombia. E-mail: [email protected] 3Netherlands Centre for Biodiversity Naturalis, P.O.Box 9517 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] 4Corresponding author Table of contents Abstract . 301 Introduction . 302 The genus Agelas in the Greater Caribbean . 302 Material and methods . 303 Classification . 304 Phylum Porifera Grant, 1835 . 304 Class Demospongiae Sollas, 1875 . 304 Order Agelasida Hartman, 1980 . 304 Family Agelasidae Verrill, 1907 . 304 Genus Agelas Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1864 . 304 Agelas dispar Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1864 . 306 Agelas cervicornis (Schmidt, 1870) . 311 Agelas wiedenmayeri Alcolado, 1984. 313 Agelas sceptrum (Lamarck, 1815) . 315 Agelas dilatata Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1864 . 316 Agelas conifera (Schmidt, 1870). 318 Agelas tubulata Lehnert & van Soest, 1996 . 321 Agelas repens Lehnert & van Soest, 1998. 324 Agelas cerebrum Assmann, van Soest & Köck, 2001. 325 Agelas schmidti Wilson, 1902 .
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy and Diversity of the Sponge Fauna from Walters Shoal, a Shallow Seamount in the Western Indian Ocean Region
    Taxonomy and diversity of the sponge fauna from Walters Shoal, a shallow seamount in the Western Indian Ocean region By Robyn Pauline Payne A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Magister Scientiae in the Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, University of the Western Cape. Supervisors: Dr Toufiek Samaai Prof. Mark J. Gibbons Dr Wayne K. Florence The financial assistance of the National Research Foundation (NRF) towards this research is hereby acknowledged. Opinions expressed and conclusions arrived at, are those of the author and are not necessarily to be attributed to the NRF. December 2015 Taxonomy and diversity of the sponge fauna from Walters Shoal, a shallow seamount in the Western Indian Ocean region Robyn Pauline Payne Keywords Indian Ocean Seamount Walters Shoal Sponges Taxonomy Systematics Diversity Biogeography ii Abstract Taxonomy and diversity of the sponge fauna from Walters Shoal, a shallow seamount in the Western Indian Ocean region R. P. Payne MSc Thesis, Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, University of the Western Cape. Seamounts are poorly understood ubiquitous undersea features, with less than 4% sampled for scientific purposes globally. Consequently, the fauna associated with seamounts in the Indian Ocean remains largely unknown, with less than 300 species recorded. One such feature within this region is Walters Shoal, a shallow seamount located on the South Madagascar Ridge, which is situated approximately 400 nautical miles south of Madagascar and 600 nautical miles east of South Africa. Even though it penetrates the euphotic zone (summit is 15 m below the sea surface) and is protected by the Southern Indian Ocean Deep- Sea Fishers Association, there is a paucity of biodiversity and oceanographic data.
    [Show full text]
  • Porifera) in Singapore and Description of a New Species of Forcepia (Poecilosclerida: Coelosphaeridae)
    Contributions to Zoology, 81 (1) 55-71 (2012) Biodiversity of shallow-water sponges (Porifera) in Singapore and description of a new species of Forcepia (Poecilosclerida: Coelosphaeridae) Swee-Cheng Lim1, 3, Nicole J. de Voogd2, Koh-Siang Tan1 1 Tropical Marine Science Institute, National University of Singapore, 18 Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119227, Singapore 2 Netherlands Centre for Biodiversity, Naturalis, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands 3 E-mail: [email protected] Key words: intertidal, Southeast Asia, sponge assemblage, subtidal, tropical Abstract gia) patera (Hardwicke, 1822) was the first sponge de- scribed from Singapore in the 19th century. This was A surprisingly high number of shallow water sponge species followed by Leucosolenia flexilis (Haeckel, 1872), (197) were recorded from extensive sampling of natural inter- Coelocarteria singaporensis (Carter, 1883) (as Phloeo­ tidal and subtidal habitats in Singapore (Southeast Asia) from May 2003 to June 2010. This is in spite of a highly modified dictyon), and Callyspongia (Cladochalina) diffusa coastline that encompasses one of the world’s largest container Ridley (1884). Subsequently, Dragnewitsch (1906) re- ports as well as extensive oil refining and bunkering industries. corded 24 sponge species from Tanjong Pagar and Pu- A total of 99 intertidal species was recorded in this study. Of lau Brani in the Singapore Strait. A further six species these, 53 species were recorded exclusively from the intertidal of sponge were reported from Singapore in the 1900s, zone and only 45 species were found on both intertidal and subtidal habitats, suggesting that tropical intertidal and subtidal although two species, namely Cinachyrella globulosa sponge assemblages are different and distinct.
    [Show full text]
  • Trophic Ecology of the Tropical Pacific Sponge Mycale Grandis Inferred from Amino Acid Compound-Specific Isotopic Analyses
    Microbial Ecology (2020) 79:495–510 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-019-01410-x HOST MICROBE INTERACTIONS Trophic Ecology of the Tropical Pacific Sponge Mycale grandis Inferred from Amino Acid Compound-Specific Isotopic Analyses Joy L. Shih1 & Karen E. Selph1 & Christopher B. Wall2 & Natalie J. Wallsgrove 3 & Michael P. Lesser4 & Brian N. Popp3 Received: 19 March 2019 /Accepted: 2 July 2019 /Published online: 17 July 2019 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Many sponges host abundant and active microbial communities that may play a role in the uptake of dissolved organic matter (DOM) by the sponge holobiont, although the mechanism of DOM uptake and metabolism is uncertain. Bulk and compound- specific isotopic analysis of whole sponge, isolated sponge cells, and isolated symbiotic microbial cells of the shallow water tropical Pacific sponge Mycale grandis were used to elucidate the trophic relationships between the host sponge and its associated microbial community. δ15Nandδ13CvaluesofaminoacidsinM. grandis isolated sponge cells are not different from those of its bacterial symbionts. Consequently, there is no difference in trophic position of the sponge and its symbiotic microbes indicating that M. grandis sponge cell isolates do not display amino acid isotopic characteristics typical of metazoan feeding. Furthermore, both the isolated microbial and sponge cell fractions were characterized by a similarly high ΣVvalue—a measure of bacterial-re-synthesis of organic matter calculated from the sum of variance among individual δ15N values of trophic amino acids. These high ΣVvalues observed in the sponge suggest that M. grandis is not reliant on translocated photosynthate from photosymbionts or feeding on water column picoplankton, but obtains nutrition through the uptake of amino acids of bacterial origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Transport of Floodwaters Following Extreme Storms Impacts Sponge Health And
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.27.064568; this version posted August 5, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Offshore transport of floodwaters following extreme storms impacts sponge health and 2 associated microbial communities 3 4 Running title: Offshore sponge microbiomes after extreme storms 5 6 Amanda N. Shore1*, Jordan A. Sims1, Michael Grimes2, Lauren I. Howe-Kerr1, Lauren Stadler3, Jason B. 7 Sylvan4, Kathryn E.F. Shamberger4, Sarah W. Davies5, Lory Z. Santiago-Vázquez2, Adrienne M.S. 8 Correa1 9 10 1. BioSciences, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA. 11 2. Biology and Biotechnology, University of Houston-Clear Lake, TX, USA. 12 3. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA. 13 4. Oceanography, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA. 14 5. Biology, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA. 15 * Corresponding author: Dr. Amanda N. Shore [email protected] 16 17 Keywords: Agelas clathrodes, coral reef, flood, Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary 18 (FGBNMS), Gulf of Mexico, Hurricane Harvey, microbial community, Xestospongia muta 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.27.064568; this version posted August 5, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Ecological Inventory for Three Bays National Park, Haiti OCTOBER 2016
    Baseline Ecological Inventory for Three Bays National Park, Haiti OCTOBER 2016 Report for the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) 1 To cite this report: Kramer, P, M Atis, S Schill, SM Williams, E Freid, G Moore, JC Martinez-Sanchez, F Benjamin, LS Cyprien, JR Alexis, R Grizzle, K Ward, K Marks, D Grenda (2016) Baseline Ecological Inventory for Three Bays National Park, Haiti. The Nature Conservancy: Report to the Inter-American Development Bank. Pp.1-180 Editors: Rumya Sundaram and Stacey Williams Cooperating Partners: Campus Roi Henri Christophe de Limonade Contributing Authors: Philip Kramer – Senior Scientist (Maxene Atis, Steve Schill) The Nature Conservancy Stacey Williams – Marine Invertebrates and Fish Institute for Socio-Ecological Research, Inc. Ken Marks – Marine Fish Atlantic and Gulf Rapid Reef Assessment (AGRRA) Dave Grenda – Marine Fish Tampa Bay Aquarium Ethan Freid – Terrestrial Vegetation Leon Levy Native Plant Preserve-Bahamas National Trust Gregg Moore – Mangroves and Wetlands University of New Hampshire Raymond Grizzle – Freshwater Fish and Invertebrates (Krystin Ward) University of New Hampshire Juan Carlos Martinez-Sanchez – Terrestrial Mammals, Birds, Reptiles and Amphibians (Françoise Benjamin, Landy Sabrina Cyprien, Jean Roudy Alexis) Vermont Center for Ecostudies 2 Acknowledgements This project was conducted in northeast Haiti, at Three Bays National Park, specifically in the coastal zones of three communes, Fort Liberté, Caracol, and Limonade, including Lagon aux Boeufs. Some government departments, agencies, local organizations and communities, and individuals contributed to the project through financial, intellectual, and logistical support. On behalf of TNC, we would like to express our sincere thanks to all of them. First, we would like to extend our gratitude to the Government of Haiti through the National Protected Areas Agency (ANAP) of the Ministry of Environment, and particularly Minister Dominique Pierre, Ministre Dieuseul Simon Desras, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • UH HIMB Sponge Biodiversity FY19 Final Report
    Project Title Using genetic techniques to determine the unknown diversity and possible alien origin of sponges present in Hawaii Agency, Division University of Hawaii, Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology Total Amount Requested $114,200 Amount Awarded $49,145 Applicants (First and Last Name) Robert Toonen & Jan Vicente Applicant Email Address [email protected] Project Start Date 1-Oct-18 Estimated Project End Date 31-May-20 Efforts to detect and prevent alien introductions depend on understanding which species are already present1–3. This is particularly important when working with taxonomically challenging groups like marine sponges (phylum Porifera), where morphological characters are highly limited, and misidentifications are common4. Although sponges are a major component of the fouling community, they remain highly understudied because they are so difficult to identify4. The Keyhole Sponge is already present in Hawaiʻi5,6, but others like Terpios hoshinota, which is invading many locations across the Pacific7,8, kills corals and turns the entire reefscape into a gray carpet that would be devastating to Hawaiʻi tourism if introduced here. However, many gray sponges look alike, and it is only through the combined use of morphological and genetic characters that most sponges can be identified reliably4. To date, there have been very few taxonomic assessments of sponges in Hawaiʻi9–14, and only the most recent of these has included any DNA barcodes in an effort to confirm the visual identifications15. Most of the early studies did not provide museum specimens or even detailed descriptions about how the species were identified, and the few vouchers that exist from these studies were dried which precludes DNA comparisons.
    [Show full text]
  • Sponge Contributions to the Geology and Biology of Reefs: Past, Present, and Future 5
    Sponge Contributions to the Geology and Biology of Reefs: Past, Present, and Future 5 Janie Wulff Abstract Histories of sponges and reefs have been intertwined from the beginning. Paleozoic and Mesozoic sponges generated solid building blocks, and constructed reefs in collaboration with microbes and other encrusting organisms. During the Cenozoic, sponges on reefs have assumed various accessory geological roles, including adhering living corals to the reef frame, protecting solid biogenic carbonate from bioeroders, generating sediment and weakening corals by eroding solid substrate, and consolidating loose rubble to facilitate coral recruitment and reef recovery after physical disturbance. These many influences of sponges on substratum stability, and on coral survival and recruitment, blur distinctions between geological vs. biological roles. Biological roles of sponges on modern reefs include highly efficient filtering of bacteria- sized plankton from the water column, harboring of hundreds of species of animal and plant symbionts, influencing seawater chemistry in conjunction with their diverse microbial symbionts, and serving as food for charismatic megafauna. Sponges may have been playing these roles for hundreds of millions of years, but the meager fossil record of soft-bodied sponges impedes historical analysis. Sponges are masters of intrigue. They play roles that cannot be observed directly and then vanish without a trace, thereby thwarting understanding of their roles in the absence of carefully controlled manipulative experiments and time-series observations. Sponges are more heterogeneous than corals in their ecological requirements and vulnerabilities. Seri- ous misinterpretations have resulted from over-generalizing from a few conspicuous species to the thousands of coral-reef sponge species, representing over twenty orders in three classes, and a great variety of body plans and relationships to corals and solid carbonate substrata.
    [Show full text]
  • Scs18-23 WG-ESA Report 2018
    Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization Serial No N6900 NAFO SCS Doc. 18/23 SC WORKING GROUP ON ECOSYSTEM SCIENCE AND ASSESSMENT – NOVEMBER 2018 Report of the 11th Meeting of the NAFO Scientific Council Working Group on Ecosystem Science and Assessment (WG-ESA) NAFO Headquarters, Dartmouth, Canada 13 - 22 November 2018 Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................................................3 Theme 1: spatial considerations................................................................................................................................................................4 1.1. Update on VME indicator species data and distribution .............................................................................4 1.2 Progress on implementation of workplan for reassessment of VME fishery closures. .................9 1.3. Discussion on updating Kernel Density Analysis and SDM’s .....................................................................9 1.4. Update on the Research Activities related to EU-funded Horizon 2020 ATLAS Project ...............9 1.5. Non-sponge and non-coral VMEs (e.g. bryozoan and sea squirts). ..................................................... 14 1.6 Ecological diversity mapping and interactions with fishing on the Flemish Cap .......................... 14 1.7 Sponge removal by bottom trawling in the Flemish Cap area: implications for ecosystem functioning ...................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Reef Sponges Harbor Coral Disease-Associated Microbes
    Symbiosis (2010) 51:117–129 DOI 10.1007/s13199-010-0059-1 Florida reef sponges harbor coral disease-associated microbes Karita Negandhi & Patricia L. Blackwelder & Alexander V. Ereskovsky & Jose V. Lopez Received: 4 December 2009 /Accepted: 5 April 2010 /Published online: 11 May 2010 # Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 Abstract Sponges can filter large volumes of seawater and detected several potential bacterial pathogens such as accumulate highly diverse and abundant microbial commu- Aurantimonas coralicida, Cytophaga sp., Desulfovibrio nities within their tissue. Culture-independent techniques spp, Serratia marcescans, and Vibrio mediterranei within such as fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), 16S small A. compressa and A. tubulata host sponges. Spatial differ- subunit (SSU) rRNA gene analyses, and transmission ences in the distribution of targeted bacteria were seen electron microscopy (TEM) were applied to characterize within sponge hosts. Transmission electron microscopy of the presence and distribution of microbes within sponges A. compressa indicated there was a higher concentration of abundant on south Florida reefs. This study found that coral bacteria in the choanosome compared to the ectosome. disease-associated bacteria (CDAB) are harbored within These observed spatial distributions support the presence of Agelas tubulata and Amphimedon compressa. FISH probes internal sponge niches, which could play a role in the location of the CDAB within the sponges. Keywords Sponge . Coral disease . Bacteria . FISH . K. Negandhi : P. L. Blackwelder : J. V. Lopez (*) Nova Southeastern University Oceanographic Center, Spatial arrangement 8000 North Ocean Drive, Dania Beach, FL 33004, USA e-mail: [email protected] 1 Introduction K. Negandhi e-mail: [email protected] Sponges are ancient organisms, with fossils dating back to P.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 114(2):359-366
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON 114(2):359-366. 200L Description of Agelas cerebrum, a new species and re-description of A. dilatata (Porifera) Michael Assmann, Rob W. M. van Soest, and Matthias Kock (MA and MK) Institut fiir Organische Chemie, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitat, Marie- Curie-Strasse 11, D-60439 Frankfurt, Germany; present address: Alfred-Wegener-Institut fiir Polar- und Meeresforschung, Am Handelshafen 12, D-27570 Bremerhaven, Germany; (RvS) Instituut voor Biodiversiteit en Ecosysteem Dynamica (Zoologisch Museum), Universiteit van Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94766, 1090 GT Amsterdam, The Netherlands Abstract. —Recent collections of sponges made in the Bahamas revealed the occurrence of two species of Agelas, which we could not assign to any of the currently recognised Agelas of the Western Atlantic. A comparison with liter- ature records and extensive collections of Agelas incorporated in several major musea led us to conclude that several specimens belong to a species new to science, Agelas cerebrum. This species differs from the repent ramose form of A. conifera (Schmidt, 1870) in possessing a massively erect tube shape, thinner spicules and a higher number of whorls of spines. From the tubular form of A. conifera the new species differs in having much thicker tube walls with a system of convolutions and meandering grooves, and likewise differences in spicular dimensions. Agelas cerebrum differs from A. tubulata Lehnert & Van Soest, 1996 in having much thicker convoluted tubes and shorter spicules. A single thickly flabellate specimen we assign to A. dilatata Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1864, a species so far considered incertae sedis, because of com- pelling similarities with its original description and depiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Mycale Grandis Gray, 1867
    Mycale grandis Gray, 1867 The orange key-hole sponge Mycale grandis is an introduced sponge that is considered invasive and a potential threat to corals and reefs in Hawaiian waters. M. grandis present on the main Hawaiian Islands. It is most likely to have been introduced is native unintentionally to the Australasia-Pacific as a fouling organism Region onand ship is hulls. M. grandis is generally restricted to shallow-water fouling communities in major harbours with associated disturbed habitats. The orange-red colouring is both internal and external. It can grow as thickly encrusting to lobate-massive cushions up to 1 metre diameter and 0.5m thick or larger. The upper surfaces of large sponges show large ostia or “keyholes”, hence the common cavernous,name. The sponge’sand often surface packed is with uneven. small The ophiuroids texture is ( Ophiactisfibrous and cf. savignyifirm but) (Eldredgecompressible, and Smithand can 2001). be torn easily. The interior is M. grandis Porites compressa was first observed in Kane‘ohe’ohe Bay, in the mid Photo credit: Steve Coles (Hawaii Biological Survey) Montipora1990s, by capitata2004 it , wasthe twoobserved dominant overgrowing reef-forming the coralfinger species coral and the ‘Near Threatened (NT)’ rice coral but there are concerns that this aggressive sponge could compete (Coles & Bolick 2006). Its ecological impacts have not been studied for space with native corals and sponge species of Kane‘ohe’ohe Bay and eventually become dominant (Coles & Bolick 2007). References: Coles, S. L and Bolick, H. 2006. Assessment of invasiveness of the orange keyhole sponge Mycale armata in Kane`ohe Bay, O`ahu, Hawai`i.
    [Show full text]