Rail Accident Report Derailment at Knaresborough 7 November 2015 Report 16/2016 August 2016 This investigation was carried out in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC; l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003; and l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2016 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.raib.gov.uk. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Fax: 01332 253301 Derby UK Website: www.gov.uk/raib DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. Preface Preface The purpose of a Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) investigation is to improve railway safety by preventing future railway accidents or by mitigating their consequences. It is not the purpose of such an investigation to establish blame or liability. Accordingly, it is inappropriate that RAIB reports should be used to assign fault or blame, or determine liability, since neither the investigation nor the reporting process has been undertaken for that purpose. The RAIB’s findings are based on its own evaluation of the evidence that was available at the time of the investigation and are intended to explain what happened, and why, in a fair and unbiased manner. Where the RAIB has described a factor as being linked to cause and the term is unqualified, this means that the RAIB has satisfied itself that the evidence supports both the presence of the factor and its direct relevance to the causation of the accident. However, where the RAIB is less confident about the existence of a factor, or its role in the causation of the accident, the RAIB will qualify its findings by use of the words ‘probable’ or ‘possible’, as appropriate. Where there is more than one potential explanation the RAIB may describe one factor as being ‘more’ or ‘less’ likely than the other. In some cases factors are described as ‘underlying’. Such factors are also relevant to the causation of the accident but are associated with the underlying management arrangements or organisational issues (such as working culture). Where necessary, the words ‘probable’ or ‘possible’ can also be used to qualify ‘underlying factor’. Use of the word ‘probable’ means that, although it is considered highly likely that the factor applied, some small element of uncertainty remains. Use of the word ‘possible’ means that, although there is some evidence that supports this factor, there remains a more significant degree of uncertainty. An ‘observation’ is a safety issue discovered as part of the investigation that is not considered to be causal or underlying to the event being investigated, but does deserve scrutiny because of a perceived potential for safety learning. The above terms are intended to assist readers’ interpretation of the report, and to provide suitable explanations where uncertainty remains. The report should therefore be interpreted as the view of the RAIB, expressed with the sole purpose of improving railway safety. The RAIB’s investigation (including its scope, methods, conclusions and recommendations) is independent of any inquest or fatal accident inquiry, and all other investigations, including those carried out by the safety authority, police or railway industry. Report 16/2016 August 2016 Knaresborough This page is intentionally left blank Report 16/2016 4 August 2016 Knaresborough Derailment at Knaresborough 7 November 2015 Contents Preface 3 Summary 7 Introduction 8 Key definitions 8 The accident 9 Summary of the accident 9 Context 9 Background information 14 Sequence of events 17 Key facts and analysis 20 Identification of the immediate cause 20 Identification of causal factors 21 Factors affecting the severity of consequences 29 Previous occurrences of a similar character 29 Summary of conclusions 31 Immediate cause 31 Causal factors 31 Underlying factors 31 Factors affecting the severity of consequences 31 Previous RAIB recommendations relevant to this investigation 32 Actions reported that address factors which otherwise would have resulted in a RAIB recommendation 32 Recommendation and Learning points 33 Recommendation 33 Learning points 34 Appendices 35 Appendix A - Glossary of abbreviations and acronyms 35 Appendix B - Glossary of terms 36 Appendix C - Investigation details 39 Report 16/2016 5 August 2016 Knaresborough This page is intentionally left blank Report 16/2016 6 August 2016 Knaresborough Summary Summary At 07:22 hrs on 7 November 2015, a Northern Rail passenger service from York to Harrogate derailed on a set of points on the approach to Knaresborough station. The train consisted of two class 150, 2-car multiple units. The leading five bogies derailed and damage was sustained by both the train and track. None of the train crew or five passengers on board were injured. The line was re-opened at 12:58 hrs on 8 November 2015. The signaller in Knaresborough signal box had authorised the train to pass a signal at danger (red), without realising that the set of points beyond the signal was in an unsafe condition. The signaller had not checked the associated points position indicator in the signal box and misinterpreted the significance of being able to reverse the signal lever, leading him to believe that the route was correctly set and safe. The signaller in Knaresborough signal box that day was a mobile operations manager. As a mobile operations manager, his core work was to respond to faults and incidents on the railway network; he operated signal boxes infrequently. The RAIB concluded that the signaller did not have a full understanding of the working of Knaresborough signal box and that this lack of knowledge may have been the result of either poor initial training or the way his knowledge had been maintained. An underlying factor to this incident was the lack of robustness of Network Rail’s competence management system for non-signallers (the people within Network Rail whose core duty is not to operate signal boxes but who occasionally have to do so). In March 2016, Network Rail re-issued the operations manual for the staff in charge of operating signalling equipment. In April 2016, Network Rail started an end-to-end review of the way it manages the competence of its signallers. As a result of this investigation, the RAIB has made one recommendation on Network Rail to review whether the changes that it has recently made to the operations manual have resulted in non-signallers maintaining the required level of knowledge and experience. The RAIB has identified five learning points. The first three learning points relate to the actions of signallers in degraded operating conditions. The fourth learning point relates to the importance of investigating and understanding the underlying reasons for repeated asset failures. The final learning point relates to the actions of drivers when authorised to pass a signal at danger and after an incident. Report 16/2016 7 August 2016 Knaresborough Introduction Introduction Key definitions 1 Metric units are used in this report, except when it is normal railway practice to give speeds and locations in imperial units. Where appropriate the equivalent metric value is also given. 2 The report contains abbreviations and technical terms (shown in italics the first time they appear in the report). These are explained in appendices A and B. Sources of evidence used in the investigation are listed in appendix C. Report 16/2016 8 August 2016 Knaresborough The accident Summary of the accident The accident 3 At 07:22 hrs on Saturday 7 November 2015, the 06:52 hrs Northern Rail passenger service from York to Harrogate derailed at the ‘A’ end of points 3 (referred as points 3A in the rest of this report) on the approach to Knaresborough station. The train, reporting number 2C07, consisted of two class 150, 2-car multiple units. Location of accident © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Department for Transport 100039241. RAIB 2016 Figure 1: Extract from map showing location of accident 4 The first five bogies derailed and damage was sustained by both the train and track. None of the train crew or five passengers on board were injured. The line was re-opened at 12:58 hrs on Sunday 8 November 2015. Context Location 5 Knaresborough station, on the London North East and East Midlands route, area North (LNE-EM North), is located on the line between York and Leeds via Harrogate. It is between Starbeck station to the west and Cattal station to the east. Cattal, Knaresborough and Starbeck stations are respectively located at 10 miles 17 chains, 16 miles 50 chains and 18 miles 27 chains from York. There is a signal box at each location. 6 Running east to west, the line between Cattal and Knaresborough stations is a bi-directional single line (known as the ‘Harrogate single’). The line between Knaresborough and Starbeck is double track (figure 3). Report 16/2016 9 August 2016 Knaresborough The accident Figure 2: Train 2C07 at the site of derailment 7 Points 3A, on which the derailment took place, are where the single line between Cattal and Knaresborough becomes double track (a crossover). For a train travelling from Cattal to Knaresborough, such as train 2C07, points 3A enable the train to move onto the DownYork line heading towards Harrogate and Leeds.