DOCSLIB.ORG

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE 16275 Nal Contempt" Or Without Defining Or Ments of the Constitution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1957 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE 16275 nal contempt" or without defining or ments of the Constitution. To substan- formity in the application of the pro- differentiating between "criminal con- tiate this point, I refer again to Wil- posed statute-section 151-and the en- tempt" and "civil contempt." proceeds loughby on the Constitution of the tire procedure would be awkward, cum- to make the provisions of the first sen- United States, page 1727, section 1141. bersome, and impracticable. tence inapplicable to those contempts In this section Willoughby points out (Although Mr. THURMOND had not con- "committed in the presence of the court that a contempt which is not committed cluded his speech at this point, but con- or so near thereto as to interfere di- in open court does require due process of tinued for some time, in view of the cir- rectly with the administration of jus- law for the defendant. The United cumstances, the following matters, which tice" and likewise inapplicable to "mis- States Supreme Court, in an opinion by were ordered to be printed at the end behavior, misconduct, or disobedience of Chief Justice Taft, held on April 13, 1925, of his speech, are printed at this place any officer of the court in respect to the that all the guaranties of due process in the RECORD:) writs, orders or process of the court." of law are available to a person charged In other words this second sentence deals with contempt. Cooke v. United States SENATOR FROM WISCONSIN with certain "contempts" and with "mis- ((1925) 267 U. S. 517.) Thus it is quite behavior of any officers of the court" and clear that the amendment-section 151- During the delivery of Mr. THUR- excludes such "contempts" and "mis- as now drafted would subject a person to MOND's remarks, behavior of any officer of the court" criminal prosecution for a statutory of- Mr. JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Presi- from the provisions of the Civil Rights fense so indefinitely defined or described dent, will the distinguished Senator from Act-H. R. 6127. In other words, the as not to enable him to determine South Carolina yield to me, with the un- second sentence says that if any con- whether or not he is committing that of- derstanding- tempt is committed in the presence of fense. Connally v. General Construction Mr. THURMOND. I will yield for a the court, or so near thereto as to inter- Co. ((1926) 269 U. S. 385) ; International question. fere directly with the administration of Harvester Co. v. Kentucky ((1914) 234 Mr. JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Pres- justice, it is not dealt with in the Civil U. S. 216); Collins v. Kentucky ((1914) ident, I should like to ask the Senator Rights Act-H. R. 6127. Likewise ex- 234 U. S. 634). if he would be agreeable to yielding to cluded from coverage by the Civil Rights Second. This amendment is unconsti- me for the purpose of making a brief Act-H. R. 6127-vould be "the mis- tutional, in violation of the fifth amend- announcement, with the understanding behavior, misconduct, or disobedience of ment prohibiting double jeopardy. that the announcement appear at the any officer of the court" in respect to That provision of the amendment conclusion of his remarks, with the fur- any writ, order, or process of court issued which permits the accused to be tried a ther understanding that when he re- presumably under authority of the Civil second time by a jury for the same of- sumes after the interruption it will not Rights Act-H. R. 6127. fense following conviction in a summary be counted as a second speech, and with The last sentence of the amendment- proceeding violates the fifth amendment the further understanding that the Sen- section 151-simply tries to restate the to the United States Constitution, which ator retain the floor. proposition now appearing in section 401 declares "nor shall any person be subject Mr. THURMOND. If unanimous con- of title 18, United States Code, that a for the same offense to be twice put in sent is obtained, and there is no objec- court of the United States has power to jeopardy of life or limb." tion on the part of the majority leader punish contempts of its authority. How- In ex parte Grossman the Supreme or minority leader, I will do so. ever in restating that posposition, this Court stated that contempt is an "of- The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. last sentence refers to "civil contempts," fense" within the meaning of the par- JOHNSTON of South Carolina in the whereas section 401 refers to "contempt doning power of the President granted in chair). Is there objection to the re- of its-the court's-authority." Thus article II, section 2, clause 1 of the enu- quest of the Senator from Texas? The we see the last sentence of the amend- merated powers of the President. Chair hears none, and it is so ordered. ment, section 151, refers to "civil con- Clause 1 declares the President "shall Mr. JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Presi- tempt," as distinguished from the first have power to grant reprieves and par- dent, I am pleased to announce that the sentence, which deals with "criminal dons of offenses against the United Senator-elect, Mr. WILLIAM PROXMIRE, contempt." States, except in cases of impeachment." from the State of Wisconsin, who was on Nowhere in the amendment is any defi- Chief Justice Taft in ex parte Grossman yesterday chosen by the citizens of Wis- nition given of either "criminal con- ((1925) 267 U. S. 87, 107) quoting Myers consin in a landslide vote, is present, tempt" or "civil contempt"; nor has Con- v. United States ((1924) 264 U. S. 95, ready, and prepared to take the oath of gress ever attempted to draw any such 104-105). office. distinction. The sole provision attempt- If contempt is an offense when it comes I should like to read at this time into ing to draw a distinction between crim- to the pardoning power of the President, the RECORD of the Senate a telegram sent inal and civil contempt is contained in it certainly is an offense under the fifth at 12:52 today, as follows: rule 42 (b) of the Federal Rules of Crim- amendment. Thus reading the language Hon. FELTON M. JOHNSTON, inal Procedure in the requirement that of the amendment-section 151-in pari Secretary of the United States Senate, the notice with respect to a criminal materia with the decisions in ex parte Capitol Building, Washington, D. C.: contempt shall describe it as such. The Grossman and Myers against United On the basis of unofficial returns of the Advisory Committee on Rules, appointed States, for the Congress to grant a sec- vote cast August 27, 1957, for the United States Senator Mr. WILLIAM PROXMIRE is the by the United States Supreme Court pur- ond trial following conviction, with the United States Senator-elect from Wisconsin suant to the act of June 29, 1940-Fifty- same defendant, the same charges, and for the residue of the unexpired term end- fourth United States Statutes at Large, the same evidence, would place the de- ing January 3, 1959. Official certificate of page 686-to assist in the preparation fendant in double jeopardy. election will follow upon completion of offi- of rules of pleading, in their notes The proposal-section 151-even if it cial canvass of vote cast. indicate that the requirement of notice were not in violation of the fifth amend- STEWART Q. HONECIK, written into rule 42 (b) was "intended ment, would place Congress in the posi- Attorney General, WARREN R. SMITH, to obviate the frequent confusion be- tion of gambling with the rights of our State Treasurer, tween criminal and civil contempt pro- citizens. Suppose a judge tries a man Members of the Board of State Canvassers. ceedings" pursuant to the suggestion or woman and finds the person guilty. made in McCann v. New York Stock Ex- The press reports this fact to the public Mr. President, the United Press ticker, change ((2d Cir., 1935) 80 F. 2d 211). and such cases are bound to stir the at 4:17 this afternoon, carried the fol- See Civil and Criminal Contempt in the public interest. The person so convicted lowing statement: Federal Courts, report of Los Angeles Bar is then tried again on the same evidence. MADISON, WIs.-The State board of can- Association, 17 Federal Rules Decisions Any jury is bound to be influenced. vassers today agreed to certify WILLIAM 167-182-1955. The Supreme Court it- In addition, what basis or standard of PROXMIRE'S senatorial victory and allow him distinction be- to go to the Senate before the official canvass. self has belabored the conduct is to be the determining factor The board will certify PROXMmE's election tween civil and criminal contempts. For as to whether the judge imposes the to the Senate clerk late today. He could the Court's distinction see Bessette v. W. lesser fine or sentence and lets his ver- take office Thursday. B. Conkey Co. ((1904) 194 U. S. 324,328). dict stand or imposes the greater fine Declaring a candidate elected before the A contempt statute certainly comes or punishment and moves the case along official canvass is believed to be unprece- within the due process of law require- to a jury trial. There would be no uni- dented in Wisconsin elections. HeinOnline -- 103 Cong. Rec. 16275 1957 16276 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE August 28 Goy. Vernon W. Thomson said, "We are * By unanimous consent, the oath was then oath of office, at the same time present- not going to stand on technicalities.
Recommended publications
  • SENATE CALL of the ROLL Iilaho.-Henry C

    SENATE CALL of the ROLL Iilaho.-Henry C

    <tongrrssional1Rcrord· United States PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 85th CONGRESS,. SECOND SESSION of America SENATE CALL OF THE ROLL Iilaho.-Henry C. Dworshak and Mr. MANSFIELD. I suggest the ab­ Frank Church. Illinois.-Paul H. Douglas and Everett TUESDAY, JANUARY 7, 1958 sence of a quorum. The VICE PRESIDENT. The Secre­ McKinley Dirksen. The 7th day of January being the day tary will call the roll. Indiana.-Homer E. Capehart and prescribed by Public Law 290, 85th The Chief Clerk <Emery L. Frazier) William E. Jenner. Congress, 1st session, for the m-eeting of <mlled the roll, and the following Sena· I owa.-Bourke B. Hiekenlooper and the 2d session of the 85th Congress, the Thos. E. Martin. tors answered to their names: Kansas.-Andrew F. Scboeppel and Senate assembled in its Chamber at the Aiken Goldwater Morse Capitol · Allott Gore Mundt Frank Carlson. RICHARD .M. NIXON, of California, Anderson Green Murray Kentucky.-John s. c ·ooper and Barrett Hayden Neely Thruston B. Morton. Vice President of the United States, Beall .Hennings Neuberger called the Senate to order at 12 o•clock 13ennett Hicken1ooper O'Mahoney Louisiana.-Allen J. Ellender and meridian. .Bible Hill Pastore Russell B. Long. .Bricker Holla;nd Payne Maine.-Margaret Chase Smith and The Chaplain, Rev. Frederick Brown Bush Hruska. Potter Harris, D. D., of the city of Washington, Butler .Humphrey Proxmire Frederick G. Payne. offered the following prayer; 13yrd Ives Purtell Maryland.-John Marshall Butler and Capehart Jackson Revercomb J. Glenn Beall. Our Father God, in the stillness of Carlson Javits Robertson Carroll Jenner Russell Massachusetts.-Leverett Saltonstall this hushed moment, in this solemn hour Oase, s.
  • Anything but Mickey Mouse: Legal Issues in the 2012 Wisconsin Gubernatorial Recall Steven M

    Anything but Mickey Mouse: Legal Issues in the 2012 Wisconsin Gubernatorial Recall Steven M

    Marquette Law Review Volume 97 Article 4 Issue 4 Summer 2014 Anything But Mickey Mouse: Legal Issues in the 2012 Wisconsin Gubernatorial Recall Steven M. Biskupic [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr Part of the Election Law Commons Repository Citation Steven M. Biskupic, Anything But Mickey Mouse: Legal Issues in the 2012 Wisconsin Gubernatorial Recall, 97 Marq. L. Rev. 925 (2014). Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol97/iss4/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marquette Law Review by an authorized administrator of Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BISKUPIC FINAL 6-30-14 (DO NOT DELETE) 7/2/2014 5:34 PM ANYTHING BUT MICKEY MOUSE: LEGAL ISSUES IN THE 2012 WISCONSIN GUBERNATORIAL RECALL STEVEN M. BISKUPIC Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker faced only the third gubernatorial recall in the nation’s history and was the first to survive. From a legal perspective, the 2012 Walker recall involved equally unique issues arising from the Wisconsin Constitution and obscure state statutes. This Article reviews the history of recall in Wisconsin and examines three significant legal issues that arose during the Walker recall: (1) litigation over review of submitted recall signatures; (2) unlimited campaign finance contributions; and (3) the scheduling of the recall election. The Article concludes that an assessment of the historical nature of the Walker recall is incomplete without consideration of the impact of these issues.
  • Committee on Appropriations UNITED STATES SENATE 135Th Anniversary

    Committee on Appropriations UNITED STATES SENATE 135Th Anniversary

    107th Congress, 2d Session Document No. 13 Committee on Appropriations UNITED STATES SENATE 135th Anniversary 1867–2002 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 2002 ‘‘The legislative control of the purse is the central pil- lar—the central pillar—upon which the constitutional temple of checks and balances and separation of powers rests, and if that pillar is shaken, the temple will fall. It is...central to the fundamental liberty of the Amer- ican people.’’ Senator Robert C. Byrd, Chairman Senate Appropriations Committee United States Senate Committee on Appropriations ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia, TED STEVENS, Alaska, Ranking Chairman THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi ANIEL NOUYE Hawaii D K. I , ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania RNEST OLLINGS South Carolina E F. H , PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico ATRICK EAHY Vermont P J. L , CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri OM ARKIN Iowa T H , MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky ARBARA IKULSKI Maryland B A. M , CONRAD BURNS, Montana ARRY EID Nevada H R , RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama ERB OHL Wisconsin H K , JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire ATTY URRAY Washington P M , ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah YRON ORGAN North Dakota B L. D , BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado IANNE EINSTEIN California D F , LARRY CRAIG, Idaho ICHARD URBIN Illinois R J. D , KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas IM OHNSON South Dakota T J , MIKE DEWINE, Ohio MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana JACK REED, Rhode Island TERRENCE E. SAUVAIN, Staff Director CHARLES KIEFFER, Deputy Staff Director STEVEN J. CORTESE, Minority Staff Director V Subcommittee Membership, One Hundred Seventh Congress Senator Byrd, as chairman of the Committee, and Senator Stevens, as ranking minority member of the Committee, are ex officio members of all subcommit- tees of which they are not regular members.
  • Margaret Farrow Wisconsin Women Making History

    Margaret Farrow Wisconsin Women Making History

    WISCONSIN THEIR STORIES WOMEN MAKING OUR LEGACY HISTORY www.womeninwisconsin.org MARGARET FARROW 1934-present City: Kenosha County: Kenosha Margaret Farrow was the first woman to serve as lieutenant governor in Wisconsin. Farrow attended Dominican Sisters of St. Catherine High School in Racine before going to Rosary College in Illinois. She earned a bachelor's degree in political science and education from Marquette University. She began her career in government as the trustee (1976-1981) and then the president (1981-1987) of Elm Grove Village. Farrow was elected to the Wisconsin State Assembly in 1986. Three years later, she was elected to the Wisconsin State Senate from a district comprising most of Waukesha county. She was re-elected in 1990, !1994, and 1998. In 2001, Farrow, a Republican, was appointed the 42nd lieutenant governor of Wisconsin after Scott McCallum, who had held that office, became governor upon the departure of Tommy Thompson. Farrow was the first woman to hold the office, which is the first leadership position in the line of succession after the governor of Wisconsin. Farrow spearheaded two statewide commissions to advance reforms that reduce the cost of government, and she played a leadership role in reforming welfare and tax policy to encourage work, saving, investment, innovation, capital formation, labor force productivity, and economic growth. She chaired the Wisconsin Women’s Council for several years and served as a member during her tenure as lieutenant governor. Farrow also chaired the governor’s work-based learning board and co-chaired the governor’s task force on invasive species. She has chaired the board of WisconsinEye, a public affairs television network; and in 2013, !she was appointed to the University of Wisconsin System Board of Regents.
  • State of Wisconsin Circuit Court Polk County

    State of Wisconsin Circuit Court Polk County

    STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT POLK COUNTY DEREK LINDOO, BRANDON WIDIKER, Case No: 20-CV-219 and JOHN KRAFT Plaintiffs, v. TONY EVERS, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Wisconsin, Defendant. PLAINTIFFS’ BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY INJUNCTION INTRODUCTION The Wisconsin Supreme Court recently held that “there is no pandemic exception … to the fundamental liberties that the Constitution safeguards.” Wisconsin Legislature v. Palm, 2020 WI 42, ¶ 53, 391 Wis. 2d 497, 531, 942 N.W.2d 900, 917 (quoting U.S. Department of Justice, Statement of Interest, Temple Baptist Church v. City of Greenville, No. 4:20-cv-64-DMB-JMV (N.D. Miss. April 14, 2020), ECF No. 6). Concurring, Justice Rebecca Grassl Bradley wrote that “fear never overrides the Constitution.” Id. at ¶ 145 n.11. In this case, Governor Tony Evers has declared a second and now a third state of emergency based upon for the same underlying public health problem – the COVID 19 pandemic.1 If these orders are allowed to stand, the state of Wisconsin will have spent over 170 days and counting under a state of emergency allowing the 1 The Plaintiffs are filing an amended complaint contemporaneously with the filing of the motion for a temporary injunction. The amended complaint adds allegations that challenge Defendant Evers’ third declaration of a state of emergency in Executive Order #90 issued on September 22, 2020. - 1 - Governor to rule by decree, authorizing him to issue “any order” said to be necessary for “the protection of persons or property.” But that’s not how the law works.
  • An Oral History Interview with WILLIAM RYAN DREW Interviewer

    An Oral History Interview with WILLIAM RYAN DREW Interviewer

    WISCONSIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY An Oral History Interview with WILLIAM RYAN DREW Interviewer: .Anita Hecht, Life History Services Recording Date: November 23, 2009 Place: Wauwatosa, Wisconsin. Length: 2.25 hours William Ryan Drew was raised in Waukon, Iowa, the oldest child of Kathryn and James F. Drew, who were active in the Democratic Party. In 1954, Drew graduated from St. Patrick's Catholic School and then attended Marquette University, where he earned a degree in history. Drew met Sen. William Proxmire during the Democratic Convention in La Crosse while volunteering for Gaylord Nelson's gubernatorial campaign in 1958. Over the next few years, Drew and Sen. Proxmire became friends whiel Drew worked on Proxmire's reelection campaign in 1963 and 1964. .After earning his J.D. degree from Marquette in 1966, Drew joined Sen. Proxmire's staff in Washington, DC. Drew worked closely with the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee, wrote speeches, and worked with Wisconsin governmental entities and organizations. He also worked on constituent issues, postal appointments, and Vietnam War concerns. In 1968, Drew resigned from Sen. Proxmire's office to run for .Alderman in Milwaukee's 4th District. He still continued to serve on Sen. Proxmire's campaign committee by organizing fundraisers, nurturing political relationships in Wisconsin, and touring the state with the Senator. In 1972, Drew was elected president of the Milwaukee City Council and in 1974 became commissioner of city development, an office he held until 1988. He later served as director
  • Radio Press International Interview with Sen. William Proxmire on His

    Radio Press International Interview with Sen. William Proxmire on His

    From: Franz Allina- Martin Grove Radio Press International 212-MU 8-5700 For Release: Monday, August 3, 1964 SENATOR HUMPHREY ENDORSED AS DEMOCRATS' "BEST" VICE PRESIDENTIAL CHOICE BY SENATOR PROXMIRE (D-WIS .) ON RPl 'S "FROM THE PEOPLE" Reveals Some Big-Businessmen Will Cross Over From G.O.P. To Vote For Lyndon Johnson WASHINGTON, D.c., August 3 -- Endorsement for Senator Hubert Humphrey (D- Minn.) as "the best" choice for the second slot on the Democratic ticket this November came last night from Senator William Proxmire (D-Wis.). The Wisconsin Senator cited Mr. Humphrey's "superlative understanding of international affairs" on Radio Press International~ "From the People" radio program. Although he also singled out Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy as being "very well qualified'' for the Vice Presidential post, he noted that "my own inclination is to say that Senator Humphrey is the best" choice at this time. "I think /senator Humphrey/ would be an exciting President as well as a fine Vice President," Mr. Proxmire declared. "We've rarely had a Senator who would have such a masterful appreciation and understanding and eloquence in so many different fields/as Mr. Humphrez7," he asserted. --MORE -2- Without mentioning names, Mr. Proxmire revealed that "a number of Senators have told me that in their states ••• tbere are a number of prominent, very responsible and sensitive big-businessmen who are coming over to vote for Lyndon Johnson." He said this "is especially true ••• in the South." "It's very conceivable that a state like Wisconsin which has gone Republican quite steadily and consistently and has not gone Democratic in a Presidential electiou since 1948 will go Republican this year and go for Goldwater,"Senator Proxmire pointed out.
  • Authorized for Public Release by the FOMC Secretariat on 5/10/2021

    Authorized for Public Release by the FOMC Secretariat on 5/10/2021

    Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 5/10/2021 BOARD OF GOVERNORS OFTHE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM WASHINGTON, D.C. 20551 April 12, 1978 TO: Federal Open Market Committee FROM: Arthur L. Broida Attached for your information are copies of (1) a letter from Chairman Miller to Senator Proxmire dated March 24, 1978; (2) Senator Proxmire's reply of April 5, with an attached copy of a letter to Senator Proxmire from Henry Kaufman; and (3) Chairman Miller's acknowledgement of April 11. This material is being circulated in connection with item 6 on the agenda for next Tuesday's FOMC meeting. Attachments Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 5/10/2021 BOARD OF GOVERNORS OFTHE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM WASHINGTON, D.C. 20551 TheHonorableWILLIAM ProxmireMILLER CHAIRMAN April 11, 1978 The Honorable William Proxmire Chairman Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Mr. Chairman: Your letter of April 5 continues our communication with respect to how the Federal Reserve and the Federal Open Market Committee make quarterly reports to Congressional committees. I have noted your suggestions and will be pleased to bring them to the attention of the FOMC, as you request. As we continue to evaluate your preferences in these matters, let me note that my own viewpoint is still evolving as I become more familiar with the actual operations of the FOMC. Perhaps some progress can be made when I appear before your Com- mittee on April 25. Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 5/10/2021 WILLIAM PROXMIRE.
  • State of Wisconsin Circuit Court Dane County Branch No

    State of Wisconsin Circuit Court Dane County Branch No

    STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT DANE COUNTY BRANCH NO. ___ SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION (SEIU), LOCAL 1, Case No. __________ 250 E. Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53202, Declaratory Judgment: 30701 SEIU HEALTHCARE WISCONSIN, Injunction or Restraining Order: 30704 4513 Vernon Blvd #300 Madison, WI 53705, MILWAUKEE AREA SERVICE AND HOSPITALITY WORKERS, 1110 N. Old World 3rd Street, Suite 304 Milwaukee, WI 53203, AFT-WISCONSIN, 1602 S. Park Avenue, Madison, WI 53715, WISCONSIN FEDERATION OF NURSES AND HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, 9620 West Greenfield Avenue, West Allis, WI 53214, RAMON ARGANDONA, 563 Glen Drive Madison, WI 53711, PETER RICKMAN, 3702 South 20th PlacE Milwaukee, WI 53221, AMICAR ZAPATA, 3654 S. 22nd Street Milwaukee, WI 53221, KIM KOHLHAAS, 4611 Otsego Street Duluth, MN 55804, JEFFREY MYERS, 342 North Yellowstone Drive Madison, WI 53705, ANDREW FELT, 3641 Jordan Lane, Stevens Point, WI 54481, CANDICE OWLEY, 2785 South Delaware Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53207, CONNIE SMITH, 4049 South 5th Place, Milwaukee, WI 53207, JANET BEWLEY, 60995 Pike River Road, Mason, WI 54856, Plaintiffs, v. ROBIN VOS, in his official capacity as Wisconsin Assembly SpEaker, 321 State St, Madison, WI 53702, ROGER ROTH, in his official capacity as Wisconsin Senate President, State Capitol—Room 220 South Madison, WI 53707 JIM STEINEKE, in his official capacity as Wisconsin Assembly Majority Leader, 2 E Main St, Madison, WI 53703 SCOTT FITZGERALD, in his official capacity as Wisconsin Senate Majority Leader, 206 State St, Madison, WI 53702 JOSH KAUL, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Wisconsin 7 W Main St, Madison, WI 53703, TONY EVERS, in his official capacity as Governor of the StatE of Wisconsin, State Capitol—Room 115 East Madison, WI 53702, Defendants.
  • It044 187000-232999

    It044 187000-232999

    Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Digital Library Collections This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections. WHORM Subject File Code: IT044 (International Monetary Fund) Case file Number(s): 187000-232999 To see more digitized collections visit: https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digitized-textual-material To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit: https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/archives/white-house-inventories Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected] Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/research- support/citation-guide National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/ WITHDRAWAL SHEET Ronald Reagan Library Collection: WHORM Subject File Archivist: cas/cas File Folder: ITO44 (-l-+60OO - 17~) . ~°'°I Date:February 14, 1997 -:rooO - ~,, . \999.Y:·~~t-J."f: }> · ,$UBJECT/TITLE.. DATE < RESTRICTION >.NO ?ANDJ?(PEac ·c ·,.,,,,.c.,,., 1. letter Reagan to President Salvador Jorge Blanco of the n.d. Pl (187527) Dominican Republic (2 pp.) RESTRICTION CODES Presidential Records Act - (44 U.S.C. 2204(a)) Freedom of lnfonnatlon Act• (5 U.S.C. 552(b)) P-1 National security classified infonnation [(a)(1) of the PRA]. F-1 National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA]. P-2 Relating to appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA). F-2 Release could disclose internal personnel rules and practices of an agency ((b)(2) of P-3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA). the FOIA). P-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial F-3 Release would violate a Federal statue ((b)(3) of the FOIA). information [(a)(4) of the PRA).
  • 3,4J~4 CAI~M To

    3,4J~4 CAI~M To

    1Ils IS1ieN l~l6 F I9JA 4aLL~ nl1E FIL~qE 3,4j~4 CAI~M to. bali ee .... i zi V !be o..plaiat of Eammab Rosenthal, oomplaiat against 5winy 0. 55hepsoa, the 4 ,5t m for Visoonsin ompaigna. tee. and aosep 7. Easier, oamittee tremauer, respniat. This complaint is made under 11 CFR 110.8 (d), 110.3 (d), 100.3 and 101.1, and other setons of the Federal Elections Code as may apply. I request that the Federal Elections Coimssion review the allegations contained herein, investigate the aqpparent violations, and take appropriate action where violations have occurred. I, Hlannah Rtosenthal, bring this complaint individually and as executive director of the Democratic Party of Wisconsin, 222 State Street, Suite 400, Madison VI 53703. I hereby allege, on information and belief, that: 1. The respondent, Tommy G. Thompson, is governor of the State of Wisconsin. Thompson for Wisconsin is his state campaign comttee, with an address of 5375 Mariners Cove, Madison WI 53704. Joseph J. Hasler is the coumittee treasurer. 2. Governor Thompson has been actively exploring a federal candidacy, for president or vice-president, since his re-election as governor in November 1994. 3. In exploring his possible candidacy, Governor Thompson has traveled widely to make political appearances which clearly are not related to his state office as governor. Since November, he has made at least 32 out-of-state trips, for which the State of Wisconsin has paid more than $13,000 in travel costs. 4. Disclosure of the number and cost of the governor's out-of- state trips, and the resulting editorial criticism, has caused the governor and his state campaign committee to take a new position on funding the travel.
  • Inflationary Impact of Pricing by Concentrated Industries

    Inflationary Impact of Pricing by Concentrated Industries

    69K INFLATIONARY IMPACT OF PRICING BY CONCENTRATED INDUSTRIES HEARINGS BEFORE THE JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES .NIYE'rY-THIED CONGRESS SECOND SESSION (Pursuant to S. Con. Res. 93) SEPTEMBER 4 AND 9, AND OCTOBER 7, 1974 Printed for the use of the Joint Economic Committee 0* U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 47-103 WASHINGTON : 1974 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 -Price $2.35 JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE (Created pursuant to sec. 5(a) of Public Law 304, 79th Cong.) WRIGHT PATMAN, Texas, Chairman WILLIAM PROXMIRE, Wisconsin, Vice Chairman HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SENATE RICHARD BOLLING, Missouri JOHN SPARKMAN, Alabama HENRY S. REUSS, Wisconsin J. W. FULBRIGHT, Arkansas MARTHA W. GRIFFITHS, Michigan ABRAHAM RIBICOFF, Connecticut WILLIAM S. MOORHEAD, Pennsylvania HUBERT H. HUMPHREY, Minnesota HUGH L. CAREY, New York LLOYD M. BENTSEN, JR., Texas WILLIAM B. WIDNALL, New Jersey JACOB K. JAVITS, New York BARBER B. CONABLE, Ji., New York CHARLES H. PERCY, Illinois CLARENCE J. BROWN, Ohio JAMES B. PEARSON, Kansas BEN B. BLACKBURN, Georgia RICHARD S. SCHWEIKER, Pennsylvania JOHN R. STARK, Executive Director JOHN R. KARLIK, Senior Economist LOUGHLIN F. MCHUGH, Senior Economist COURTENAY M. SLATER, Senior Economist RICHARD F. KAUFMAN, General Counsel ECONOMISTS WILLIAM A. Cox Lucy A. FALCONE ROBERT D. HAMRIN SARAH JACKSON JERRY J. JASINOWSKI L. DOUGLAS Lim CARL V. SEARS GEORGE R. TYLER LARRY YUSPEH MINORITY LESLIE J. BANDUR GEORG3 D. KRUMBH[AAR, Jr. (Counsel) WALTER B. LAESSIO (Counsel) (W) CONTENTS WITNESSES AND STATEMENTS WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1974 Proxmire, Hon. William, vice chairman of the Joint Economic Committee: Page Opening statement -1------------------------------- I Scherer, Frederic M., Director-designate, Bureau of Economics, Federal Trade Commission 2 Weston, J.