HURRICANE PATRICIA (EP202015) 20 – 24 October 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

HURRICANE PATRICIA (EP202015) 20 – 24 October 2015 NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER TROPICAL CYCLONE REPORT HURRICANE PATRICIA (EP202015) 20 – 24 October 2015 Todd B. Kimberlain, Eric S. Blake, and John P. Cangialosi National Hurricane Center 1 4 February 2016 METOP-B ENHANCED INFRARED SATELLITE IMAGE AT 0323 UTC 23 OCTOBER. IMAGE COURTESY CIRA. Patricia was a late-season major hurricane that intensified at a rate rarely observed in a tropical cyclone. It became a category 5 hurricane (on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale) over anomalously warm waters to the south of Mexico, and the strongest hurricane on record in the eastern North Pacific and North Atlantic basins. The hurricane turned north-northeastward and weakened substantially before making landfall along a sparsely populated part of the coast of southwestern Mexico as a category 4 hurricane. Patricia produced a narrow swath of severe damage and two direct deaths. 1 Original report date 1 February 2016. Updated 4 February to correct storm chaser report, peak 24-h pressure fall, Hurricane Linda’s peak intensity in Fig. 6, and the date of Hurricane Lane. Hurricane Patricia 2 Hurricane Patricia 20 – 24 OCTOBER 2015 SYNOPTIC HISTORY Patricia’s development into a tropical cyclone was slow and complicated, involving the interaction of multiple weather systems. A tropical disturbance crossed the southern part of Central America on 11 October, and entered the eastern Pacific the following day several hundred nautical miles south of El Salvador. While this system moved little, a tropical wave was moving westward over the Caribbean Sea, and reached Central America on 15 October. The wave moved into the eastern Pacific the next day and merged with the first disturbance while a Gulf of Tehuantepec gap wind event was occurring. The gap wind event provided an injection of cyclonic vorticity to the merged disturbance (Levine 2012, Holbach and Bourassa 2014), and an elongated area of low pressure formed later that day, extending from the Yucatan Peninsula southward for several hundred miles into the eastern Pacific. Deep convection associated with the large cyclonic gyre increased substantially on 17 October, possibly due to more favorable large-scale conditions associated with the passage of the rising branch of a strong Madden-Julian Oscillation moving eastward across the eastern Pacific. The system’s cloud pattern was gradually becoming better organized while it moved slowly northwestward to a position a few hundred nautical miles south of the Gulf of Tehuantepec on 18 October, where it developed a smaller and better defined circulation. However, a second gap wind event, stronger than the first, began later that day. Although this gap wind event initially had a disruptive effect on the formative tropical cyclone, the low reformed to the northeast later on 19 October on the cyclonic shear side of the strengthening gap wind event. Deep convection associated with the low increased and became well organized by early on 20 October. An ASCAT pass around 0400 UTC 20 October suggested that a small, well-defined circulation had developed underneath the convection within a larger cyclonic envelope elongated from north to south, and it is estimated that a tropical depression finally formed around 0600 UTC that day centered about 180 n mi south-southeast of Salina Cruz, Mexico. The “best track” chart of the tropical cyclone’s path is given in Fig. 1, with the wind and pressure histories shown in Figs. 2 and 3, respectively. The best track positions and intensities are listed in Table 12. The depression was located to the south of a mid-level ridge centered over the Gulf of Mexico, extending west-southwestward into the eastern Pacific. The steering provided by this feature and the gap wind event caused the depression to drift west-southwestward while the cyclone gradually strengthened, and the system became a tropical storm 18 h after genesis. By early on 21 October Patricia encountered relatively drier and more stable lower- to middle- tropospheric air, and sea surface temperatures that were at least 2º C lower than the surrounding 2 A digital record of the complete best track, including wind radii, can be found on line at ftp://ftp.nhc.noaa.gov/atcf. Data for the current year’s storms are located in the btk directory, while previous years’ data are located in the archive directory. Hurricane Patricia 3 region, the result of strong gap winds over a large area extending well to the south of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. The less favorable thermodynamic environment slowed development, with deep convection temporarily diminishing and cloud-top temperatures warming late on 20 October and early on 21 October. Once Patricia moved outside of the affected region later that morning, however, a rapid increase in deep convection occurred over the low-level center, and a small central dense overcast (CDO) began to form while the storm moved at a faster forward speed toward the west and then the west-northwest. A NOAA Hurricane Hunter aircraft reached Patricia that afternoon and discovered it to already be a 50-kt tropical storm, consistent with the rapid increase in organization of the cloud pattern seen in satellite imagery. A period of rapid intensification had already begun in an environment of very light vertical wind shear, high atmospheric moisture and greater instability over anomalously warm waters, untapped since Hurricane Carlos traversed the region in June. Patricia strengthened into a hurricane shortly after 0000 UTC 22 October while centered about 200 n mi south of Acapulco, Mexico. Over the next 24 h, Patricia’s satellite presentation changed dramatically, as a large band with cloud-top temperatures of -80º to -90º C coiling cyclonically inward over the center evolved into an almost perfectly symmetric CDO around a 10 n mi wide eye. A NOAA plane arrived at the end of this 24-h period around 1800 UTC 22 October, and indicated that Patricia had already reached major hurricane strength, with estimated surface winds of 115 kt and a minimum pressure of 957 mb. The rapid intensification phase continued into the night while Patricia turned northwestward and its forward speed decreased, and satellite imagery indicated that a solid ring of cloud-top temperatures colder than -90º C surrounding a 7 n mi wide eye had formed by 0300 UTC 23 October (cover figure). By the time an Air Force Hurricane Hunter aircraft reached the cyclone around 0600 UTC, Patricia had intensified into an extremely powerful hurricane with maximum sustained winds of 180 kt and a minimum central pressure of around 879 mb. The satellite presentation continued to increase in organization over the next several hours after the plane left, and Patricia is estimated to have reached a peak intensity of 185 kt around 1200 UTC that day while centered about 130 n mi southwest of Manzanillo, Mexico. Patricia reached the western periphery of the mid-level ridge centered over the Gulf of Mexico around this time and turned north-northwestward and then northward while essentially maintaining its intensity. By the time the last reconnaissance mission reached Patricia around 1800 UTC 23 October, the hurricane had turned north-northeastward with some increase in forward speed, in response to a shortwave trough moving across the Baja California peninsula and northwestern Mexico. Although the aircraft still found surface winds of near 180 kt on its first pass through the storm in the southeastern quadrant, a 2023 UTC Global Precipitation Mission (GPM) overpass indicated a distinct double eyewall structure (Fig. 4), suggestive of an imminent weakening trend. Upper-air analyses also indicated that southwesterly vertical wind shear was gradually increasing over the cyclone, and a final pass by the plane around 2030 UTC indicated that a rapid filling of the cyclone had begun; the peak flight-level winds had decreased nearly 50 kt in the same quadrant traversed earlier and the central pressure had risen 24 mb in the 3 h since the first fix. Patricia continued to rapidly weaken during the next couple of hours before landfall, and is estimated to have reached the southwestern coast of Mexico in the state of Jalisco, near Playa Cuixmala, around 2300 UTC 23 October with an intensity of 130 kt and a minimum pressure of around 932 mb. The hurricane continued to weaken rapidly during the next several hours while Hurricane Patricia 4 it moved over the high terrain of the Sierra Madre mountains, and Patricia fell below hurricane strength before passing well to the west of Guadalajara around 0300 UTC 24 October. When the mid-level center raced northeastward and separated from the low-level center overnight, Patricia weakened to a tropical depression. The cyclone dissipated later that morning over central Mexico. METEOROLOGICAL STATISTICS Observations in Patricia (Figs. 2 and 3) include subjective satellite-based Dvorak technique intensity estimates from the Tropical Analysis and Forecast Branch (TAFB) and the Satellite Analysis Branch (SAB), and objective Advanced Dvorak Technique (ADT) estimates from the Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies/University of Wisconsin-Madison. Observations also include flight-level, stepped frequency microwave radiometer (SFMR), and dropwindsonde observations from three flights of the 53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron of the U. S. Air Force Reserve Command and one NOAA Aircraft Operations Center WP-3D aircraft. A NASA WB-57 aircraft flying at high altitude provided useful dropsonde data on Patricia’s intensity on 21 October. Data and imagery from NOAA polar-orbiting satellites including the Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit (AMSU), the NASA Global Precipitation Mission (GPM), the European Space Agency’s Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT), and Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) satellites, among others, were also useful in constructing the best track of Patricia. There were no reliable ship reports of winds of tropical storm force associated with Patricia. Selected surface observations from land stations are given in Table 2.
Recommended publications
  • P2h.8 Landfalling Tropical Cyclones in the Eastern Pacific
    P2H.8 LANDFALLING TROPICAL CYCLONES IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC. PART I: CASE STUDIES FROM 2006 AND 2007. Luis M. Farfán1, Rosario Romero-Centeno2, G. B. Raga2 and Jorge Zavala-Hidalgo2 1Unidad La Paz, CICESE, Mexico 2Centro de Ciencias de la Atmósfera, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico 1. INTRODUCTION Western Mexico routinely experiences landfall of those that moved onto the mainland acquired a significant tropical cyclones. Jáuregui (2003) documented that 65 eastward component by 20ºN. Additionally, most storms hurricanes approached the west coast and 60% of them developed late in the season with highest frequency made landfall in the northwestern part of the country during the last two-thirds of September (35%) and all of between 1951 and 2000. This area is located north of October (54%). In a study of the period 1966-2004, 20ºN and west of 105ºW, which includes the Baja Romero-Vadillo et al. (2007) identified this type of storm California Peninsula and the States of Nayarit, Sinaloa track and the landfall trend associated with the presence and Sonora. Also, 64% of 88 tropical storms entered this of westerly airflow at middle and upper levels. area, increasing precipitation in this very arid region. Some of these systems continued moving northward after landfall and, eventually, had an influence on the weather conditions in the southwestern United States. The records for the eastern Pacific basin, provided by the National Hurricane Center, reveal 614 tropical cyclones during 1970–2007. Figure 1 displays the tracks of the sub-group of tropical cyclones that made landfall over northwestern Mexico. The upper panel (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Cyclone—Induced Heavy Rainfall and Flow in Colima, Western Mexico
    Heriot-Watt University Research Gateway Tropical cyclone—Induced heavy rainfall and flow in Colima, Western Mexico Citation for published version: Khouakhi, A, Pattison, I, López-de la Cruz, J, Martinez-Diaz, T, Mendoza-Cano, O & Martínez, M 2019, 'Tropical cyclone—Induced heavy rainfall and flow in Colima, Western Mexico', International Journal of Climatology, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6393 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1002/joc.6393 Link: Link to publication record in Heriot-Watt Research Portal Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: International Journal of Climatology General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via Heriot-Watt Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy Heriot-Watt University has made every reasonable effort to ensure that the content in Heriot-Watt Research Portal complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 1 Tropical cyclone - induced heavy rainfall and flow in 2 Colima, Western Mexico 3 4 Abdou Khouakhi*1, Ian Pattison2, Jesús López-de la Cruz3, Martinez-Diaz 5 Teresa3, Oliver Mendoza-Cano3, Miguel Martínez3 6 7 1 School of Architecture, Civil and Building engineering, Loughborough University, 8 Loughborough, UK 9 2 School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society, Heriot Watt University, 10 Edinburgh, UK 11 3 Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Colima, Mexico 12 13 14 15 Manuscript submitted to 16 International Journal of Climatology 17 02 July 2019 18 19 20 21 *Corresponding author: 22 23 Abdou Khouakhi, School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough 24 University, Loughborough, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern North Pacific Hurricane Season of 1997
    2440 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW VOLUME 127 Eastern North Paci®c Hurricane Season of 1997 MILES B. LAWRENCE Tropical Prediction Center, National Weather Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Miami, Florida (Manuscript received 15 June 1998, in ®nal form 20 October 1998) ABSTRACT The hurricane season of the eastern North Paci®c basin is summarized and individual tropical cyclones are described. The number of tropical cyclones was near normal. Hurricane Pauline's rainfall ¯ooding killed more than 200 people in the Acapulco, Mexico, area. Linda became the strongest hurricane on record in this basin with 160-kt 1-min winds. 1. Introduction anomaly. Whitney and Hobgood (1997) show by strat- Tropical cyclone activity was near normal in the east- i®cation that there is little difference in the frequency of eastern Paci®c tropical cyclones during El NinÄo years ern North Paci®c basin (east of 1408W). Seventeen trop- ical cyclones reached at least tropical storm strength and during non-El NinÄo years. However, they did ®nd a relation between SSTs near tropical cyclones and the ($34 kt) (1 kt 5 1nmih21 5 1852/3600 or 0.514 444 maximum intensity attained by tropical cyclones. This ms21) and nine of these reached hurricane force ($64 kt). The long-term (1966±96) averages are 15.7 tropical suggests that the slightly above-normal SSTs near this storms and 8.7 hurricanes. Table 1 lists the names, dates, year's tracks contributed to the seven hurricanes reach- maximum 1-min surface wind speed, minimum central ing 100 kt or more. pressure, and deaths, if any, of the 1997 tropical storms In addition to the infrequent conventional surface, and hurricanes, and Figs.
    [Show full text]
  • Climatology, Variability, and Return Periods of Tropical Cyclone Strikes in the Northeastern and Central Pacific Ab Sins Nicholas S
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School March 2019 Climatology, Variability, and Return Periods of Tropical Cyclone Strikes in the Northeastern and Central Pacific aB sins Nicholas S. Grondin Louisiana State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Climate Commons, Meteorology Commons, and the Physical and Environmental Geography Commons Recommended Citation Grondin, Nicholas S., "Climatology, Variability, and Return Periods of Tropical Cyclone Strikes in the Northeastern and Central Pacific asinB s" (2019). LSU Master's Theses. 4864. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/4864 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CLIMATOLOGY, VARIABILITY, AND RETURN PERIODS OF TROPICAL CYCLONE STRIKES IN THE NORTHEASTERN AND CENTRAL PACIFIC BASINS A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Department of Geography and Anthropology by Nicholas S. Grondin B.S. Meteorology, University of South Alabama, 2016 May 2019 Dedication This thesis is dedicated to my family, especially mom, Mim and Pop, for their love and encouragement every step of the way. This thesis is dedicated to my friends and fraternity brothers, especially Dillon, Sarah, Clay, and Courtney, for their friendship and support. This thesis is dedicated to all of my teachers and college professors, especially Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • NWS Unified Surface Analysis Manual
    Unified Surface Analysis Manual Weather Prediction Center Ocean Prediction Center National Hurricane Center Honolulu Forecast Office November 21, 2013 Table of Contents Chapter 1: Surface Analysis – Its History at the Analysis Centers…………….3 Chapter 2: Datasets available for creation of the Unified Analysis………...…..5 Chapter 3: The Unified Surface Analysis and related features.……….……….19 Chapter 4: Creation/Merging of the Unified Surface Analysis………….……..24 Chapter 5: Bibliography………………………………………………….…….30 Appendix A: Unified Graphics Legend showing Ocean Center symbols.….…33 2 Chapter 1: Surface Analysis – Its History at the Analysis Centers 1. INTRODUCTION Since 1942, surface analyses produced by several different offices within the U.S. Weather Bureau (USWB) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA’s) National Weather Service (NWS) were generally based on the Norwegian Cyclone Model (Bjerknes 1919) over land, and in recent decades, the Shapiro-Keyser Model over the mid-latitudes of the ocean. The graphic below shows a typical evolution according to both models of cyclone development. Conceptual models of cyclone evolution showing lower-tropospheric (e.g., 850-hPa) geopotential height and fronts (top), and lower-tropospheric potential temperature (bottom). (a) Norwegian cyclone model: (I) incipient frontal cyclone, (II) and (III) narrowing warm sector, (IV) occlusion; (b) Shapiro–Keyser cyclone model: (I) incipient frontal cyclone, (II) frontal fracture, (III) frontal T-bone and bent-back front, (IV) frontal T-bone and warm seclusion. Panel (b) is adapted from Shapiro and Keyser (1990) , their FIG. 10.27 ) to enhance the zonal elongation of the cyclone and fronts and to reflect the continued existence of the frontal T-bone in stage IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Guide
    HOUSTON/GALVESTON HURRICANE GUIDE CAUTION HURRICANE SEASON > TROPICAL STORM BILL 2015 ©2016 CenterPoint Energy 161174 55417_txt_opt_205.06.2016 08:00 AMM Introduction Index of Pages Hurricanes and tropical storms have brought damaging winds, About the Hurricane devastating storm surge, flooding rains and tornadoes to Southeast Page 3 Texas over the years. The 1900 Galveston Hurricane remains the Storm Surge deadliest natural disaster on record for the United States with an Page 4 - 5 estimated 8000 deaths. In 2008 Hurricane Ike brought a deadly storm Zip Zone Evacuation surge to coastal areas and damaging winds that led to extended Pages6-7 power loss to an estimated 3 million customers in southeast Texas. A Winds, Flooding, and powerful hurricane will certainly return but it is impossible to predict Tornadoes Pages8-9 when that will occur. The best practice is to prepare for a hurricane landfall ahead of each hurricane season every year. Preparing Your Home, Business and Boat Pages10-11 This guide is designed to help you prepare for the hurricane season. For Those Who Need There are checklists on what to do before, during and after the storm. Assistance Each hurricane hazard will be described. Maps showing evacuation Page 12 zones and routes are shown. A hurricane tracking chart is included in Preparing Pets and Livestock the middle of the booklet along with the names that will be used for Page 13 upcoming storms. There are useful phone numbers for contacting the Insurance Tips local emergency manager for your area and web links for finding Page 14 weather and emergency information.
    [Show full text]
  • 1858 San Diego Hurricane and Not Be Sur- Documented to Be Real
    THE SAN DIEGO HURRICANE OF 2 OCTOBER 1858 BY MICHAEL CHENOWETH AND CHRISTOPHER LANDSEA The discovery of a hurricane that directly impacted San Diego, California, nearly 150 yr ago has implications for residents and risk managers in their planning for extreme events for the region. ropical cyclones forming in the eastern North 10 September 1976 in California and Arizona, and Pacific Ocean are occasional visitors to the Hurricane Nora in September 1997 in Arizona. Only T southwestern United States. By the time these the 1939 tropical storm made a direct landfall in coastal systems travel far enough to the north to bring their California (Smith 1986), because the other three sys- associated moisture to the United States, the tropical tems entered the United States after first making land- cyclones have normally diminished below tropical fall in Mexico. storm strength over Mexico or over the colder waters The 1939 tropical storm caused $2 million in prop- of the California Current that flows southward along erty damage in California, mostly to shipping, shore the California coast. Rain, sometimes locally excessive, structures, power and communication lines, and crops. is frequently observed in many areas of the southwest- Ships in coastal waters of southern California reported ern United States when tropical cyclone remnants en- southeast winds between 34 and 47 kt (Hurd 1939). ter the region (Blake 1935; Smith 1986). However, no tropical cyclones are recorded or esti- Four tropical cyclones have managed to bring tropi- mated to have made landfall in the southwestern cal storm–force winds to the southwestern United United States as a hurricane, with maximum 1-min States during the twentieth century: a tropical storm surface (10 m) winds of at least 64 kt.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentación De Powerpoint
    Diversidad de pelágicos mayores afectado por el paso del huracán “Linda” Diversidad específica de pelágicos Sur (BCS), México. Se contó con datos de un mayores por efecto del huracán “Linda” lance previo al paso del huracán y se realizó al noroeste del Golfo de Úlloa, Baja un lance posterior en la misma zona de pesca. California Sur, México. En dichos lances se identificaron siete especies congregados en cuatro grupos de peces de Specific diversity of longest pelagic by pelágicos mayores (tiburones, raya, picudos y dorado), siendo el grupo de tiburones el que the influence of hurricane “Linda” in the obtuvo la mayor densidad de organismos (79.2 Gulf of Ulloa Norwest, Baja California %), seguido por los picudos con el 16.7 %. Sur, Mexico. Mediante el índice de Margalef y de Shannon se identificó al lance posterior como la Carlos Javier Godínez Padilla1*, Rafael comunidad de mayor biodiversidad con valor Hernández Guzmán2 y José Leonardo Castillo de 1.5952 y 0.7681 respectivamente, mientras Géniz1 que el índice de Pielou mostró que la abundancia en ambos lances, son valores 1Centro Regional de Investigación Pesquera - cercanos a 1. A pesar de que la diversidad de Ensenada, INAPESCA. Carretera Tijuana- pelágicos es ligeramente mayor en el lance Ensenada Km 97.5, Parque Industrial posterior al paso del Huracán Linda, estos Fondeport, El Sauzal de Rodríguez, C.P. 22760, valores no presentaron diferencia significativa Ensenada, Baja California, México. entre el lance previo (H’= 0.5939 ± 0.27) y el 2CONACYT Research Fellow, Instituto de lance posterior (H’= 0.7681 ± 0.33; t = -0.22; Investigaciones sobre los Recursos Naturales g.l.= 95; p> 0.05), sin embargo, la clorofila Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de influyó aparentemente en la abundancia de las Hidalgo, C.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Thor's Legions American Meteorological Society Historical Monograph Series the History of Meteorology: to 1800, by H
    Thor's Legions American Meteorological Society Historical Monograph Series The History of Meteorology: to 1800, by H. Howard Frisinger (1977/1983) The Thermal Theory of Cyclones: A History of Meteorological Thought in the Nineteenth Century, by Gisela Kutzbach (1979) The History of American Weather (four volumes), by David M. Ludlum Early American Hurricanes - 1492-1870 (1963) Early American Tornadoes - 1586-1870 (1970) Early American Winters I - 1604-1820 (1966) Early American Winters II - 1821-1870 (1967) The Atmosphere - A Challenge: The Science of Jule Gregory Charney, edited by Richard S. Lindzen, Edward N. Lorenz, and George W Platzman (1990) Thor's Legions: Weather Support to the u.s. Air Force and Army - 1937-1987, by John F. Fuller (1990) Thor's Legions Weather Support to the U.S. Air Force and Army 1937-1987 John F. Fuller American Meteorological Society 45 Beacon Street Boston, Massachusetts 02108-3693 The views expressed in this book are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the United States Government. © Copyright 1990 by the American Meteorological Society. Permission to use figures, tables, and briefexcerpts from this monograph in scientific and educational works is hereby granted provided the source is acknowledged. All rights reserved. No part ofthis publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, elec­ tronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permis­ sion ofthe publisher. ISBN 978-0-933876-88-0 ISBN 978-1-935704-14-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-935704-14-0 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1990 Library of Congress catalog card number 90-81187 Published by the American Meteorological Society, 45 Beacon Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02108-3693 Richard E.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Louis Uccellini Assistant Administrator for Weather Services and Director of the National Weather Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S
    Dr. Louis Uccellini Assistant Administrator for Weather Services and Director of the National Weather Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce Testimony to the Environment Subcommittee of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology United States House of Representatives Field Hearing: Weathering the Storm: Improving Hurricane Resiliency through Research July 22, 2019 Good morning Chairwoman Fletcher, Ranking Member Marshall, and Members of the Subcommittee. I am Dr. Louis Uccellini, Director of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) National Weather Service (NWS). Within the NWS, NOAA’s National Hurricane Center (NHC) issues the official forecast for all Atlantic and eastern Pacific tropical cyclones (hurricanes, tropical storms and tropical depressions) and their precursors. It is my honor to testify before you today on the state of the United States hurricane forecasting capability; our efforts to improve our understanding and prediction of hurricane impacts from storm surge, heavy precipitation, and high winds; and what hurricane research focus areas are needed to improve prediction. I come before you today to report that hurricane forecasting accuracy has improved tremendously over the past two decades. The NHC track (storm location) forecast errors have decreased every decade since forecast accuracy records were established in the 1960’s, and NHC has set new records almost every year. For perspective, the average two-day Atlantic forecast location error was reduced from around 300 miles (approximately 260 nautical miles (n mi), see Fig. 1) in the 1960s to near 85 miles in the 2010s. The five-day forecast for storm location is now better than the day-and-a-half forecast was in the 1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning from Hurricane Hugo: Implications for Public Policy
    LEARNING FROM HURRICANE HUGO: IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC POLICY prepared for the FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY 500 C Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20472 under contract no. EMW-90-G-3304,A001 June 1992 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................... 1.............I PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STORM . 3 Wind Speeds .3 IMPACTS ON NATURAL SYSTEMS 5 ................................ Biological Systems ....... .................................5 Dunes and Beaches ....... .5............................... Beach Nourishment . .................................7 IMPACTS ON HUMANS AND HUMAN SYSTEMS ............................ 9 Deaths and Injuries ............................ 9 Housing ............................ 9 Utilities ................... 10 Transportation Systems .1................... 10 The Economy ................... 11 Psychological Effects ................... 11 INSURANCE .......................... 13 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT .......................... 14 Setbacks ........................... 15 Coastal Protection Structures .......................... 16 PERFORMANCE OF STRUCTURES ..... .... 18 Effects of Wind and/or Water ...... .... 18 Effects of Water, Waves, or Erosion . .. .18 Effects of Wind .............. .... 19 Foundations .................. .... 21 Slabs ................ .... 22 Piers and Columns ....... .... 22 Pilings............... .... 22 Elevation .................. .... 23 Lower Area Enclosures .... .... 23 Connections ................. ....24 Manufactured Housing .......... .... 24
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Tropical Cyclone Profile August 2021
    Commonwealth of Massachusetts Tropical Cyclone Profile August 2021 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Tropical Cyclone Profile Description Tropical cyclones, a general term for tropical storms and hurricanes, are low pressure systems that usually form over the tropics. These storms are referred to as “cyclones” due to their rotation. Tropical cyclones are among the most powerful and destructive meteorological systems on earth. Their destructive phenomena include storm surge, high winds, heavy rain, tornadoes, and rip currents. As tropical storms move inland, they can cause severe flooding, downed trees and power lines, and structural damage. Once a tropical cyclone no longer has tropical characteristics, it is then classified as a post-tropical system. The National Hurricane Center (NHC) has classified four stages of tropical cyclones: • Tropical Depression: A tropical cyclone with maximum sustained winds of 38 mph (33 knots) or less. • Tropical Storm: A tropical cyclone with maximum sustained winds of 39 to 73 mph (34 to 63 knots). • Hurricane: A tropical cyclone with maximum sustained winds of 74 mph (64 knots) or higher. • Major Hurricane: A tropical cyclone with maximum sustained winds of 111 mph (96 knots) or higher, corresponding to a Category 3, 4 or 5 on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale. Primary Hazards Storm Surge and Storm Tide Storm surge is an abnormal rise of water generated by a storm, over and above the predicted astronomical tide. Storm surge and large waves produced by hurricanes pose the greatest threat to life and property along the coast. They also pose a significant risk for drowning. Storm tide is the total water level rise during a storm due to the combination of storm surge and the astronomical tide.
    [Show full text]