DOCSLIB.ORG

South Mather Wetlands Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
South Mather Wetlands Management Plan South Mather Wetlands Management Plan Prepared by: Sacramento County Department of Economic Development With Assistance from: H. T. Harvey & Associates AECOM Sacramento Valley Conservancy Carol Witham November 2013 SOUTH MATTHER WETLANDS MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by: Sacramento County Department of Economic Development With Assistance from: H.T. Harvey & Associates AECOM Sacramento Valley Conservancy Carol Witham Report Date: November 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................................ i 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Purpose, Organization, and Development of the South Mather Wetlands Management Plan ........... 1-1 1.1.1 Document Approach and Scope ............................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.2 Relationship to Other Documents............................................................................................. 1-2 1.2 Location and Project History .......................................................................................................... 1-3 1.3 Management Areas and Land Uses ................................................................................................. 1-7 1.4 Management Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................ 1-9 1.4.1 Natural Resource Management Goals and Objectives ............................................................... 1-9 1.5 Plan Requirements and Planning Influences ................................................................................. 1-11 1.5.1 Plan Requirements ................................................................................................................. 1-11 1.5.2 Planning Influences ............................................................................................................... 1-11 1.6 Ecosystem Management and Adaptive Management .................................................................... 1-12 1.6.1 Ecosystem Management ........................................................................................................ 1-12 1.6.2 Adaptive Management ........................................................................................................... 1-13 2 Physical Environment ............................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Climate .......................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Topography ................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 Drainage and Hydrology .......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2.2 Historic Impacts ...................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3 Geology and Soils .......................................................................................................................... 2-5 2.3.1 Soil Types ............................................................................................................................... 2-5 3 Biological Environment .......................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Vegetation Communities ................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1.1 Community Descriptions ......................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Wildlife ......................................................................................................................................... 3-6 3.3 Special-status Species .................................................................................................................... 3-7 3.3.1 Species Frequently Encountered ............................................................................................ 3-11 3.3.2 Species Occasionally or Infrequently Encountered ................................................................. 3-12 3.3.3 Species with the Potential to be Found within Management Areas.......................................... 3-17 3.3.4 Species Unlikely to be Found within Management Areas ....................................................... 3-18 3.4 Invasive Species .......................................................................................................................... 3-19 3.4.1 Definition and Overview of Invasive Plant Species ................................................................ 3-19 3.4.2 Population Profiles ................................................................................................................ 3-19 3.4.3 Species Descriptions .............................................................................................................. 3-20 4 Management, Maintenance, Restoration, and Public Use Roles and Responsibilities ......................... 4-1 4.1 Wetlands preserve Owner .............................................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Wetlands Preserve Manager ........................................................................................................... 4-2 4.3 Easement Holder ............................................................................................................................ 4-3 4.4 Qualified Personnel ........................................................................................................................ 4-3 4.5 Airport Manager ............................................................................................................................ 4-3 4.5.1 Conservation Area Management Coordination with Airport ..................................................... 4-4 4.6 Public Interest Groups .................................................................................................................... 4-4 4.7 Changes in Personnel ..................................................................................................................... 4-4 5 Habitat Management Activities ............................................................................................................. 5-1 5.1 Management Framework................................................................................................................ 5-1 5.2 Conservation Area Management Guidelines ................................................................................... 5-1 Sacramento County Department of Economic Development South Mather Wetlands Management Plan i Table of Contents 5.2.1 Thatch Management ................................................................................................................ 5-1 5.2.2 Invasive Plant Management ................................................................................................... 5-10 6 Preserve Maintenance Activities ............................................................................................................ 6-1 6.1 Fencing .......................................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 Signage .......................................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.3 Infrastructure ................................................................................................................................. 6-1 6.4 United States Air Force Remediation Facilities .............................................................................. 6-1 6.5 Fire Breaks .................................................................................................................................... 6-2 6.6 Right-of-way Maintenance ............................................................................................................. 6-2 6.7 Grazing Improvements ................................................................................................................... 6-2 6.8 Trash and Refuse ........................................................................................................................... 6-3 6.9 Trespass Patrol ............................................................................................................................... 6-3 6.10 Problem and Pest Wildlife Management ......................................................................................... 6-4 6.10.1 Hazardous Wildlife Management ............................................................................................. 6-4 6.10.2 Domestic and Feral Animal Control ......................................................................................... 6-4 6.10.3 Mosquito Abatement ............................................................................................................... 6-5 6.10.4 Coyote Control .......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wild Plants of Redwood Regional Park Common Name Version
    Wild Plants of Redwood Regional Park Common Name Version A Photographic Guide Sorted by Form, Color and Family with Habitat Descriptions and Identification Notes Photographs and text by Wilde Legard District Botanist, East Bay Regional Park District New Revised and Expanded Edition - Includes the latest scientific names, habitat descriptions and identification notes Decimal Inches .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1 .5 2 .5 3 .5 4 .5 5 .5 6 .5 7 .5 8 .5 9 1/8 1/4 1/2 3/4 1 1/2 2 1/2 3 1/2 4 1/2 5 1/2 6 1/2 7 1/2 8 1/2 9 English Inches Notes: A Photographic Guide to the Wild Plants of Redwood Regional Park More than 2,000 species of native and naturalized plants grow wild in the San Francisco Bay Area. Most are very difficult to identify without the help of good illustrations. This is designed to be a simple, color photo guide to help you identify some of these plants. This guide is published electronically in Adobe Acrobat® format so that it can easily be updated as additional photographs become available. You have permission to freely download, distribute and print this guide for individual use. Photographs are © 2014 Wilde Legard, all rights reserved. In this guide, the included plants are sorted first by form (Ferns & Fern-like, Grasses & Grass-like, Herbaceous, Woody), then by most common flower color, and finally by similar looking flowers (grouped by genus within each family). Each photograph has the following information, separated by '-': COMMON NAME According to The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition (JM2) and other references (not standardized).
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 9-17-2018 Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park" (2018). Botanical Studies. 85. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/85 This Flora of Northwest California-Checklists of Local Sites is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF THE REDWOOD NATIONAL & STATE PARKS James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State Univerity Arcata, California 14 September 2018 The Redwood National and State Parks are located in Del Norte and Humboldt counties in coastal northwestern California. The national park was F E R N S established in 1968. In 1994, a cooperative agreement with the California Department of Parks and Recreation added Del Norte Coast, Prairie Creek, Athyriaceae – Lady Fern Family and Jedediah Smith Redwoods state parks to form a single administrative Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosporum • northwestern lady fern unit. Together they comprise about 133,000 acres (540 km2), including 37 miles of coast line. Almost half of the remaining old growth redwood forests Blechnaceae – Deer Fern Family are protected in these four parks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vernal Pool Landscape at the Nature Conservancy's Vina Plans
    The Vernal Pool Landscape At The Nature Conservancy’s Vina Plans Preserve Presentation by Barbara Castro, California Department of Water Resources Text and photographs prepared by Rob Schlising, California State University, Chico (retired) Topics I Location, and history of, Vina Plains Preserve II The results of research done at VPP: a major resource III …and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Vernal Pool Recovery Plan Red Bluff about 23 miles to the north Road in to old barn Original 1525 acres, with 4 fenced pastures Chico about 15 miles to the south Cemented volcanic mudflow underlies whole area and forms Northern Hardpan Vernal Pool bottoms paler green vegetation darker green vegetation reflects loamy soils reflects clayey soils barn Photo by Pauleen Broyles, winter 1983 Graduation of the first class of docents, spring 1983 The Nature Conservancy assembled a team of docents, spring 1983, that prepared in the field… Docents also prepared indoors. Graduation of the first class of docents, spring 1983 The Nature Conservancy hosted a dedication ceremony of the Vina Plains Preserve, at the old sheep-barn, on 16 April 1983 Mounts Lassen and Brokeoff showed that day 35 years ago 350 people attended, for a program by TNC—with a band, a catered chicken picnic lunch, and tours of the landscape by the docents. Landscape tours by the docents began for the pubic in 1984, starting from old logs located north of the sheep-barn. Over 1200 people visited VPP during the first several years of tours. The docent committee prepared a VPP handbook in 1984 (1994 revision shown) The Nature Conservancy has maintained ownership—and management—of the Preserve.
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands 1996
    National List of Vascular Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary Indicator by Region and Subregion Scientific Name/ North North Central South Inter- National Subregion Northeast Southeast Central Plains Plains Plains Southwest mountain Northwest California Alaska Caribbean Hawaii Indicator Range Abies amabilis (Dougl. ex Loud.) Dougl. ex Forbes FACU FACU UPL UPL,FACU Abies balsamea (L.) P. Mill. FAC FACW FAC,FACW Abies concolor (Gord. & Glend.) Lindl. ex Hildebr. NI NI NI NI NI UPL UPL Abies fraseri (Pursh) Poir. FACU FACU FACU Abies grandis (Dougl. ex D. Don) Lindl. FACU-* NI FACU-* Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt. NI NI FACU+ FACU- FACU FAC UPL UPL,FAC Abies magnifica A. Murr. NI UPL NI FACU UPL,FACU Abildgaardia ovata (Burm. f.) Kral FACW+ FAC+ FAC+,FACW+ Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL FACU- FACU- UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL NI NI UPL,FACU- Acacia choriophylla Benth. FAC* FAC* Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. FACU NI NI* NI NI FACU Acacia greggii Gray UPL UPL FACU FACU UPL,FACU Acacia macracantha Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd. NI FAC FAC Acacia minuta ssp. minuta (M.E. Jones) Beauchamp FACU FACU Acaena exigua Gray OBL OBL Acalypha bisetosa Bertol. ex Spreng. FACW FACW Acalypha virginica L. FACU- FACU- FAC- FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acalypha virginica var. rhomboidea (Raf.) Cooperrider FACU- FAC- FACU FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acanthocereus tetragonus (L.) Humm. FAC* NI NI FAC* Acanthomintha ilicifolia (Gray) Gray FAC* FAC* Acanthus ebracteatus Vahl OBL OBL Acer circinatum Pursh FAC- FAC NI FAC-,FAC Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FAC FACU FACU* FAC FACU FACU*,FAC Acer grandidentatum Nutt.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Wildflowers of the Modoc National Forest Selected Wildflowers of the Modoc National Forest
    United States Department of Agriculture Selected Wildflowers Forest Service of the Modoc National Forest An introduction to the flora of the Modoc Plateau U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region i Cover image: Spotted Mission-Bells (Fritillaria atropurpurea) ii Selected Wildflowers of the Modoc National Forest Selected Wildflowers of the Modoc National Forest Modoc National Forest, Pacific Southwest Region U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region iii Introduction Dear Visitor, e in the Modoc National Forest Botany program thank you for your interest in Wour local flora. This booklet was prepared with funds from the Forest Service Celebrating Wildflowers program, whose goals are to serve our nation by introducing the American public to the aesthetic, recreational, biological, ecological, medicinal, and economic values of our native botanical resources. By becoming more thoroughly acquainted with local plants and their multiple values, we hope to consequently in- crease awareness and understanding of the Forest Service’s management undertakings regarding plants, including our rare plant conservation programs, invasive plant man- agement programs, native plant materials programs, and botanical research initiatives. This booklet is a trial booklet whose purpose, as part of the Celebrating Wildflowers program (as above explained), is to increase awareness of local plants. The Modoc NF Botany program earnestly welcomes your feedback; whether you found the book help- ful or not, if there were too many plants represented or too few, if the information was useful to you or if there is more useful information that could be added, or any other comments or concerns. Thank you. Forest J. R. Gauna Asst.
    [Show full text]
  • Ventura County Plant Species of Local Concern
    Checklist of Ventura County Rare Plants (Twenty-second Edition) CNPS, Rare Plant Program David L. Magney Checklist of Ventura County Rare Plants1 By David L. Magney California Native Plant Society, Rare Plant Program, Locally Rare Project Updated 4 January 2017 Ventura County is located in southern California, USA, along the east edge of the Pacific Ocean. The coastal portion occurs along the south and southwestern quarter of the County. Ventura County is bounded by Santa Barbara County on the west, Kern County on the north, Los Angeles County on the east, and the Pacific Ocean generally on the south (Figure 1, General Location Map of Ventura County). Ventura County extends north to 34.9014ºN latitude at the northwest corner of the County. The County extends westward at Rincon Creek to 119.47991ºW longitude, and eastward to 118.63233ºW longitude at the west end of the San Fernando Valley just north of Chatsworth Reservoir. The mainland portion of the County reaches southward to 34.04567ºN latitude between Solromar and Sequit Point west of Malibu. When including Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands, the southernmost extent of the County occurs at 33.21ºN latitude and the westernmost extent at 119.58ºW longitude, on the south side and west sides of San Nicolas Island, respectively. Ventura County occupies 480,996 hectares [ha] (1,188,562 acres [ac]) or 4,810 square kilometers [sq. km] (1,857 sq. miles [mi]), which includes Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands. The mainland portion of the county is 474,852 ha (1,173,380 ac), or 4,748 sq.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Tarplant (Blepharizonia Plumosa)
    Plants Big Tarplant (Blepharizonia plumosa) Big Tarplant (Blepharizonia plumosa) Status Federal: None State: None CNPS: List 1B Population Trend Global: Unknown State: Unknown Within Inventory Area: Unknown © 2002 John Game Data Characterization The location database for big tarplant includes 36 data records dated from 1916 to 2001 (California Natural Diversity Database 2005). Twenty-nine of the occurrences were documented within the last 10 years. Seven of the occurrences have not been observed for over 60 years, but all the other occurrences are believed to be extant (California Natural Diversity Database 2005). Most of the occurrences are of high precision and may be accurately located, including those within the inventory area. Very little ecological information is available for big tarplant. The published literature on the species pertains primarily to its taxonomy. The main sources of general information on this species are the Jepson Manual (Hickman 1993) and the California Native Plant Society (2005). Specific observations on habitat and plant associates, threats, and other factors are summarized in the California Natural Diversity Database (2005). Range Big tarplant is endemic to the Mount Diablo foothills and is found primarily in eastern Contra Costa, eastern Alameda, and western San Joaquin Counties (Hoover 1937). Occurrences within the ECCC HCP/NCCP Inventory Area In the inventory area, big tarplant is known from 4 occurrences on Cowell Ranch, west of Brentwood, 7 occurrences on Roddy Ranch, south of Antioch, and one occurrence in Mount Diablo State Park, southeast of Clayton (California Natural Diversity Database 2005, Lake 2004). The historic occurrences in Antioch are likely to have been extirpated, although at least 1 population is present at Black Diamond Mines Regional Park (Preston pers.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 42 No. 7 September 2016 Northern Nevada Events Society
    Vol. 42 No. 7 September 2016 Sharptooth angelica (Angelica arguta), a 2015 Wildflower Calendar Photo Contest entry by James D. Morefield Society News 2016 Wildflower Photo Contest – oasis of Soda Springs. The desert near Submissions for the annual NNPS photo the center boasts a plethora of plants contest will be open from September 1 with a nice variety of Eriogonum. through September 22. Winning photos Sessions will be led by Ben Grady, will be featured in the 2017 NNPS Arnold Clifford, and Jim Andre. calendar. Details are on our website. Registration is $100 per attendee and is limited to Eriogonum Society members. September 16-19 – Desert Studies Center, Baker, CA. The Eriogonum Missing Newsletter – The August Society annual meeting. This year newsletter was lost in the post. Reprints we celebrate the Mojave at the Desert are included with this mailing. Studies Center, a field station of California State University, located within Events subject to change. the Mojave National Preserve at the Visit nvnps.org for updates. Northern Nevada Events August 27 – Tahoe City, CA. Field trip Wilderness to the west and Lake Tahoe to Barker Pass, southwest of Tahoe City. to the east. This is a moderate hike on Our leaders will be John Weiser and established trails and ridge tops. Gary Monroe. We hope to see Primula Those traveling from the Carson area suffrutescens, Epilobium canum ssp. should meet at the Save Mart at the Latifolium and Gentiana calycosa and corner of College and N. Carson Street, can expect great vistas of the Desolation in Carson City at 7:45 am to carpool.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant Species with Documented Or Recorded Occurrence in Placer County
    A PPENDIX II Vascular Plant Species with Documented or Reported Occurrence in Placer County APPENDIX II. Vascular Plant Species with Documented or Reported Occurrence in Placer County Family Scientific Name Common Name FERN AND FERN ALLIES Azollaceae Mosquito fern family Azolla filiculoides Pacific mosquito fern Dennstaedtiaceae Bracken family Pteridium aquilinum var.pubescens Bracken fern Dryopteridaceae Wood fern family Athyrium alpestre var. americanum Alpine lady fern Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosorum Lady fern Cystopteris fragilis Fragile fern Polystichum imbricans ssp. curtum Cliff sword fern Polystichum imbricans ssp. imbricans Imbricate sword fern Polystichum kruckebergii Kruckeberg’s hollyfern Polystichum lonchitis Northern hollyfern Polystichum munitum Sword fern Equisetaceae Horsetail family Equisetum arvense Common horsetail Equisetum hyemale ssp. affine Scouring rush Equisetum laevigatum Smooth horsetail Isoetaceae Quillwort family Isoetes bolanderi Bolander’s quillwort Isoetes howellii Howell’s quillwort Isoetes orcuttii Orcutt’s quillwort Lycopodiaceae Club-moss family Lycopodiella inundata Bog club-moss Marsileaceae Marsilea family Marsilea vestita ssp. vestita Water clover Pilularia americana American pillwort Ophioglossaceae Adder’s-tongue family Botrychium multifidum Leathery grapefern Polypodiaceae Polypody family Polypodium hesperium Western polypody Pteridaceae Brake family Adiantum aleuticum Five-finger maidenhair Adiantum jordanii Common maidenhair fern Aspidotis densa Indian’s dream Cheilanthes cooperae Cooper’s
    [Show full text]
  • PEST RISK ANALYSIS for Platynota Stultana Walsingham, 1884
    REINO DE ESPAÑA MINISTERIO DE AGRICULTURA, ALIMENTACION Y MEDIO AMBIENTE Dirección General de Sanidad de la Producción Agraria Subdirección General de Sanidad e Higiene Vegetal y Forestal PEST RISK ANALYSIS FOR Platynota stultana Walsingham, 1884 Source: University of California May 2016 Express Pest Risk Analysis for Platynota stultana May 2016 Express Pest Risk Analysis for Platynota stultana Walsingham, 1884 This PRA follows the EPPO Standard PM 5/5(1) Decision support Scheme for an Express Pest Risk Analysis Summary of the Express Pest Risk Analysis for: “Platynota stultana” PRA area: The European Union Describe the endangered area: The pest has the potential for establishment in greenhouses and other protected conditions in all the PRA area, but with low likelihood as far as current phytosanitary management measures against other Lepidoptera are applied. Outdoors likelihood of establishment is higher in the Mediterranean basin and Portugal. Main conclusions Overall assessment of risk: Likelihood of: Rating of risk Uncertainty Comments Consignments originating outside the European Union in countries where P.stultana occurs (México or the USA) High – For Plants for planting (cuttings, life plants and floriculture products, plants for planting not yet planted) with or without soil attached in consignments originating outside the European Union in countries where P.stultana occurs (México or the USA) Worst case: [Dianthus caryophyllus L. (carnation)] High – For fresh fruits of Grapes (the pest can be carried not only internally in fruit
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
    [Show full text]
  • North Cascades National Park — 50 Years
    VOLUME 42, NO. 2 Summer 2018 Journal of the Douglasia WASHINGTON NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY To promote the appreciation and conservation of Washington’s native plants and their habitats through study, education, and advocacy. North Cascades National Park — 50 Years Summer 2018 • DOUGLASIA Douglasia VOLUME 42, NO. 2 SUMMER 2018 journal of the washington native plant society About This Issue WNPS Fellows* by David Giblin Clay Antieau Joe Miller** William Barker** Margaret Miller** Sometime last year WNPS Fellow Fred Weinmann sug- Nelsa Buckingham** Mae Morey gested that the summer 2018 Douglasia issue be dedicated to Pamela Camp Brian O. Mulligan** Tom Corrigan** Ruth Peck Ownbey** the flora of Washington’s national parks. The editorial board Melinda Denton** Jim Riley thought this was a great idea, so here it is. Thanks to Fred for Lee Ellis Gary Smith the inspiring idea and to all of the authors for sharing their Betty Jo Fitzgerald** Ron Taylor** knowledge about the plants, people, and resources affiliated Mary Fries** Richard Tinsley Amy Jean Gilmartin** Ann Weinmann with these parks. Al Hanners** Fred Weinmann Lynn Hendrix** * WNPS Fellow is the highest WNPS President Don Schaechtel provides a delightful Karen Hinman** honor given to a member by reminiscence of his more than 30 years of hiking, climbing, Marie Hitchman our society. This title is given and botanizing throughout Washington’s three national parks. Catherine Hovanic to those who have made Two articles in this issue remind us of the significant contribu- Art Kermoade** outstanding contributions to Don Knoke** the understanding and/or tions that amateur botanists have made at two of these parks.
    [Show full text]