DOCSLIB.ORG

Eugenics, Jim Crow, and Baltimore's Best

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law Faculty Scholarship Francis King Carey School of Law Faculty 11-2016 Eugenics, Jim Crow, and Baltimore's Best Garrett Power University of Maryland School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/fac_pubs Part of the Law and Race Commons, and the Legal History Commons Digital Commons Citation Power, Garrett, "Eugenics, Jim Crow, and Baltimore's Best" (2016). Faculty Scholarship. 1572. https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/fac_pubs/1572 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Francis King Carey School of Law Faculty at DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Volume XLIX • Number 6 November/December 2016 Maryland Legal History November 2016 MARYLAND BAR JOURNAL 1 2 MARYLAND BAR JOURNAL November 2016 Volume XLIX • Number 6 November/December 2016 16 34 4 46 Published bimonthly by the Maryland State Bar Association, Inc. The Maryland Bar Center “Maryland Legal History” 520 W. Fayette St. Baltimore, Maryland 21201 Telephone: (410) 685-7878 (800) 492-1964 Website: www.msba.org Features Executive Director: Paul V. Carlin 4 Eugenics, Jim Crow & Baltimore’s Best Editor: W. Patrick Tandy Assistant to the Editor: Lisa Muscara By Garrett Power Design: Jason Quick Advertising Sales: Network Media Partners Subscriptions: MSBA members receive 16 A Look Back: University of Maryland BALSA, 1976-1979 THE MARYLAND BAR JOURNAL as $20 of their dues payment goes to By Harry S. Johnson publication. Others, $42 per year. POSTMASTER: Send address change to THE MARYLAND BAR JOURNAL 22 Psychologists As Expert Witnesses: A Legal Retrospective 520 W. Fayette St. Baltimore, MD 21201 By Kenneth A. Vogel The Maryland Bar Journal welcomes articles on topics of interest to Maryland 28 People’s Progress: Looking Backward and Forward attorneys. All manuscripts must be original work, submitted for approval by the After 20 Years Special Committee on Editorial Advisory, and must conform to the Journal style By Dave Pantzer guidelines, which are available from the MSBA headquarters. The Special 34 Integration in a Post-Brown World: A Conversation with Committee reserves the right to reject any manuscript submitted for publication. Judge Marcella Holland Advertising: Advertising rates will be furnished upon request. All advertising By Jennifer L. Kent and Christy A. Fisher is subject to approval by the Editorial Advisory Board. 40 A History of Divorce in Maryland: Where It Started Editorial Advisory Board and Where It Should Go Courtney A. Blair, Chair James B. Astrachan By Benjamin Schenker Alexa E. Bertinelli Cameron A. Brown Susan K. Francis 46 What You “Say” on Social Media May Have Consequences Peter A. Heinlein Hon. Marcella A. Holland (ret.) By Alvin I. Frederick and Erin A. Risch Louise A. Lock Victoria H. Pepper Gwendolyn S. Tate MSBA Officers (2016-2017) President: Hon. Harry C. Storm Departments President-Elect: Sara H. Arthur 52 Ethics Docket 2016-13 By the Ethics Committee Secretary: Hon. Keith R. Truffer Treasurer: Hon. Mark F. Scurti Whether a lawyer can pay a fee to an online legal directory for increased Statements or opinions expressed herein are visibility throughout the website, including on other lawyers’ profile pages? those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Maryland State Bar 54 Attorney Grievance Commission By Glenn M. Grossman Association, its officers, Board of Governors, the Editorial Board or staff. Publishing an The Health of the Profession advertisement does not imply endorsement of any product or service offered. November 2016 MARYLAND BAR JOURNAL 3 eugenics, jim crow & baltimore’s best By Garrett Power introduction During the first half of the twentieth century, Jim Crow laws denied suffrage, housing, education, and justice to black Baltimoreans. These laws were conceived and implemented by Baltimore’s leading attorneys. Why did the “Best of the Bar” choose to be the active agents of white supremacy and racial segregation? Perhaps history has an answer. 4 MARYLAND BAR JOURNAL November 2016 November 2016 MARYLAND BAR JOURNAL 5 Biological Science as examples. Marbury was just one of humankind.” Simply put, the During the second half of the nine- generation removed from his impov- Progressives advocated: teenth century biological science erished family’s slaveholding planta- 1. White supremacy; found itself at the start of a “paradigm tion in southern Maryland when he 2. Racial segregation; and shift.” Charles Darwin’s 1859 theo- arrived in Baltimore in the 1870s. 3. Selective breeding. ry of evolution was challenging the He was admitted to the newly cre- old belief of “creationism.” Darwin’s ated Johns Hopkins University, but In Richard T. Ely’s words, gover- notion of “natural selection” hypoth- a shortage of funds forced him to nance by white men was imperative esized that the best adapted members drop out and go to work while taking because “…negroes [were] grownup chil- of any biological species had the great- evening classes at the University of dren and should be treated as such.” A est chance to survive and to reproduce Maryland School of Law. W. Cabell racial quarantine was thought neces- themselves. Bruce (1860-1946), a patrician gradu- sary to protect white people from the In 1869, Francis Galton had applied ate of the University of Virginia, was contagion and the violence endemic Darwin’s “survival of the fittest” to his classmate; Marbury and Bruce in black communities. Controls on human society. Galton’s “eugenics” shared class honors at the 1881 grad- breeding were required to prevent opined that interbreeding among the uation. T. Woodrow Wilson (1856- race-mixing, and to eliminate defec- leading specimens of the Anglo Saxon 1924) arrived from Virginia in 1886 tive genes from the gene pool. white race had produced a people (where he had previously earned his Cabell Bruce, Woodrow Wilson, with superior and health, energy, abil- law degree) intent upon pursuing a and William Marbury became ity, and manliness. J.H.U. doctorate. dedicated Progressives who were destined to have long and distin- guished public careers. Woodrow After the War Between Progressivism Wilson would become President of the States The Johns Hopkins University had Princeton University and, eventu- U.S. constitutional law was also in been founded in Baltimore in 1876 ally, President of the United States. the midst of change. After the “War as the nation’s first research insti- Cabell Bruce would represent the between the States” (1861-1865), tution. It stood at the center of the State of Maryland in the United the victorious North modified the Progressive movement. Richard Ely States Senate and receive a Pulitzer Nation’s organic law. The Thirteenth (1854-1943) joined the faculty in 1881 Prize for a biography of Benjamin Amendment abolished slavery; the as a professor of Political Economy. Franklin. William Marbury became Fourteenth Amendment bestowed Schooled in the German tradition, one of the nation’s leading lawyers citizenship on all persons born in the Ely championed government con- and, in the words of H.L. Mencken, United States and guaranteed to them trol over all aspects of human life “one of the best citizens Maryland the “equal protection of the law, and; (business, employment, immigration, ever had.” the Fifteenth Amendment granted and families). A dedicated Episcopal Each of these men in their own “Negro suffrage.” churchman, Ely preached a “Social way advanced the Progressive segre- A mixed lot of newcomers inundat- Gospel” that would create a “heaven gationist’s agenda. Bruce published ed Baltimore. Black freemen from the on earth.” a vitriolic monograph entitled The South and immigrants from Ireland, Ely founded the Baltimore-based Negro Problem (1890) wherein he Italy, Poland, and Russia overwhelmed American Economics Association warned of the prospect of an “igno- the city’s capacity to provide shelter, (AEA). Both Ely and the AEA rant” black vote, and of the dangers jobs, schools, and health care. embraced Progressivism and of acceptance of “savage” Negroes Displaced men from the southern Galton’s new science of eugenics. into the white midst. Wilson, when gentry also came to town seeking edu- Eugenics explained all differences in President of Princeton, rejected all cation and professional opportunity. human intelligence, character, and black applicants, and when President William L. Marbury (1858-1935), temperament as matters of hered- of the United States, re-segregated W. Cabell Bruce (1860-1946), and T. ity. Eugenic measures were touted the federal civil service. Marbury Woodrow Wilson (1856-1924) stand the way to “advance the progress spent the remainder of his profes- 6 MARYLAND BAR JOURNAL November 2016 All Family Law Matters • Litigation • Appeals • Mediation Collaborative Law • Neutral Case Evaluation We Solve Problems. With over 30 years’ experience we provide a broad depth of knowledge in all family law matters. In our centrally located office in Greenspring Valley, we advocate for you with efficiency and a real “get it done” attitude. Rated Multiple Years! The Law Offices of Julie Ellen Landau landaulaw.com 1925 Old Valley Road • Suite 2 • Stevenson, MD 21153 P.O. Box 219 • 410.625.1100 • FX410.625.2174 November 2016 MARYLAND BAR JOURNAL 7 sional life in active opposition to elected a Republican Governor and a to pass. The Poe Amendment was the integration of African-Americans Republican Mayor. Democratic Party then defeated by the voters at ref- into full citizenship and participa- Boss Gorman bewailed the electoral erendum. Although registered as tion in Baltimore life. power of this minority which was Democrats, foreign-born citizens “altogether unfit for the management joined long-time Republicans and of the affairs of any community.” blacks in voting against the amend- Turn of the Century ment.
Recommended publications
  • Race and Membership in American History: the Eugenics Movement

    Race and Membership in American History: the Eugenics Movement

    Race and Membership in American History: The Eugenics Movement Facing History and Ourselves National Foundation, Inc. Brookline, Massachusetts Eugenicstextfinal.qxp 11/6/2006 10:05 AM Page 2 For permission to reproduce the following photographs, posters, and charts in this book, grateful acknowledgement is made to the following: Cover: “Mixed Types of Uncivilized Peoples” from Truman State University. (Image #1028 from Cold Spring Harbor Eugenics Archive, http://www.eugenics archive.org/eugenics/). Fitter Family Contest winners, Kansas State Fair, from American Philosophical Society (image #94 at http://www.amphilsoc.org/ library/guides/eugenics.htm). Ellis Island image from the Library of Congress. Petrus Camper’s illustration of “facial angles” from The Works of the Late Professor Camper by Thomas Cogan, M.D., London: Dilly, 1794. Inside: p. 45: The Works of the Late Professor Camper by Thomas Cogan, M.D., London: Dilly, 1794. 51: “Observations on the Size of the Brain in Various Races and Families of Man” by Samuel Morton. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, vol. 4, 1849. 74: The American Philosophical Society. 77: Heredity in Relation to Eugenics, Charles Davenport. New York: Henry Holt &Co., 1911. 99: Special Collections and Preservation Division, Chicago Public Library. 116: The Missouri Historical Society. 119: The Daughters of Edward Darley Boit, 1882; John Singer Sargent, American (1856-1925). Oil on canvas; 87 3/8 x 87 5/8 in. (221.9 x 222.6 cm.). Gift of Mary Louisa Boit, Julia Overing Boit, Jane Hubbard Boit, and Florence D. Boit in memory of their father, Edward Darley Boit, 19.124.
  • NAACP Strategy in the Covenant Cases Clement E

    NAACP Strategy in the Covenant Cases Clement E

    Case Western Reserve Law Review Volume 6 | Issue 2 1955 NAACP Strategy in the Covenant Cases Clement E. Vose Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Clement E. Vose, NAACP Strategy in the Covenant Cases, 6 W. Res. L. Rev. 101 (1955) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol6/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Law Review by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 1955) NAACP Strategy in the Covenant Cases Clement E. Vose ON MAY 3, 1948, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that neither federal nor state courts may issue injunctions to enforce racial re- strictive covenants.1 This decision reversed thirty years of history during which privately-drawn housing restrictions against Negroes had been en- forced by the courts of nineteen states and the District of Columbia. Be- cause precedent and the Restatement of Property,2 issued by the American Law Institute in 1944, favored judicial sanction of racial covenants, the Supreme Coures decision gave a surprising turn to legal development. On the other hand, when the Negroes' political power THE AuTHOR (AD., 1947, University of and legal skill is taken into Maine; M.A., 1949, PhD., 1952, University of account their victory in the Wisconsin) is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Western Reserve University.
  • Alan S. Rosenthal, Esquire

    Alan S. Rosenthal, Esquire

    ALAN S. ROSENTHAL, ESQUIRE Oral History Project The Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit Oral History Project United States Courts The Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit District of Columbia Circuit ALAN S. ROSENTHAL, ESQUIRE Interviews conducted by: Judith S. Feigin, Esquire In 2011: March 3, March 21, April 20, May 9, May 23, June 6, June 20 July 18 and July 25 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface .. i Oral History Agreements Alan S. Rosenthal, Esquire. iii Judith S. Feigin, Esquire. v Oral History Transcript of Interviews: Interview No. 1, March 3, 2011. 1 Interview No. 2, March 21, 2011. 29 Interview No. 3, April 20, 2011.. 63 Interview No. 4, May 9, 2011. 93 Interview No. 5, May 23, 2011. 122 Interview No. 6, June 6, 2011. 151 Interview No. 7, June 20, 2011. 177 Interview No. 8, July 18, 2011.. 206 Interview No. 9, July 25, 2011.. 236 Epitaph by Mr. Rosenthal, May 2012. A-1 Index. B-1 Table of Cases. C-1 Biographical Sketches Alan S. Rosenthal, Esquire. D-1 Judith S. Feigin, Esquire. D-3 NOTE The following pages record interviews conducted on the dates indicated. The interviews were recorded digitally or on cassette tape, and the interviewee and the interviewer have been afforded an opportunity to review and edit the transcript. The contents hereof and all literary rights pertaining hereto are governed by, and are subject to, the Oral History Agreements included herewith. © 2012 Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit. All rights reserved. PREFACE The goal of the Oral History Project of the Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit is to preserve the recollections of the judges of the Courts of the District of Columbia Circuit and lawyers, court staff, and others who played important roles in the history of the Circuit.
  • Independent Freedpeople of the Five Slaveholding Tribes

    Independent Freedpeople of the Five Slaveholding Tribes

    Anderson 1 “On the Forty Acres that the Government Give Me”1: Independent Freedpeople of the Five Slaveholding Tribes as Landholders, Indigenous Land Allotment Policy, and the Disruption of Racial, Gender, and Class Hierarchies in Jim Crow Oklahoma Keziah Anderson Undergraduate Senior Thesis Department of History Columbia University April 15th, 2020 Seminar Advisor: Professor George Chauncey Second Reader: Professor Celia Naylor 1 Kiziah Love, interview with Jessie R. Ervin, spring 1937, Colbert, OK, in The WPA Oklahoma Slave Narratives, ed. T. Lindsay Baker and Julie Philips Baker (Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1996), 262. See Appendix 6 for a full transcript of Kiziah Love’s slave narrative. © 2020 Anderson 2 - Notice - None of the work included in this document may be cited or quoted without express written permission from the author. © 2020 Anderson 3 - Table of Contents - Acknowledgements 4 Introduction 5-15 Chapter 1: “You’ve an Indian Not a Negro”: Racecraft, 15-36 Land Allotment Policy, and Class Inequalities in Post-Allotment and Post-Statehood Oklahoma Racecraft and Land Use in the Pre-Allotment Period 15 Racecraft, Blood Quantum, and Ideology in the Jim Crow South & Indian Territory 18 Racecraft in the Allotment Process: Blood Quanta, One-Drop-of-Blood Rules, and Land Land Allotments, Indigeneity, and Racecraft in Post-Statehood Oklahoma 25 Chapter 2: The Reshaping of Gender in the Post-Allotment and 38-51 Post-Statehood Period: Independent Freedwomen Landowners, the (Re)Establishment of Black Infrastructure, and
  • The Colonial Roots of the Racial Fetishization of Black Women

    The Colonial Roots of the Racial Fetishization of Black Women

    Black & Gold Volume 2 Article 2 2016 The oloniC al Roots of the Racial Fetishization of Black Women Caren M. Holmes College of Wooster Follow this and additional works at: https://openworks.wooster.edu/blackandgold Part of the African American Studies Commons, and the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons Recommended Citation Holmes, Caren M. (2016) "The oC lonial Roots of the Racial Fetishization of Black Women," Black & Gold: Vol. 2. Available at: https://openworks.wooster.edu/blackandgold/vol2/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Open Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Black & Gold by an authorized administrator of Open Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Holmes: The Colonial Roots of the Racial Fetishization of Black Women The Colonial Era: The narrative of New World imperialism was eroticized by rhetoric that sexualized the imperialist practices of European colonizers. Documentation of the British conquest is riddled with language that suggests the sexual nature of the land and of its discovery. In his travel logs, Columbus suggested that the earth is shaped like a woman’s breast (Mclinktok, 2001). The New World was frequently described as “virgin land” by colonizers, wrongly suggesting an empty and uninhabited territory (Mclinktok, 2001). This patriarchal narrative of imperialization depicts the New World through rhetoric normally ascribed to women, suggesting the land’s passive and submissive nature, awaiting the conquest of men. This romancization was used to validate the conquest of the land itself, precluding the sexualization of the women made victim by these imperialist mindsets.
  • Jim Crow Laws to Pass Laws to Their Benefit

    Jim Crow Laws to Pass Laws to Their Benefit

    13, 1866. It stated that "No state shall deprive any person of life, Name liberty, or property without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Many states got around this amendment by creating their own laws. Whites still held the majority of seats in the state legislatures, so it was easy Jim Crow Laws to pass laws to their benefit. Several states made marriage or even dating between races a crime. You could be put in prison for such a By Jane Runyon crime. Some vigilantes took the law into their own hands and hanged anyone they thought might be breaking this law. Vigilantes are people Many people believed that who try to enforce a law without the help of regular law enforcement. the end of the Civil War The hangings by these vigilantes were called lynchings. The Ku Klux would bring great changes to Klan became infamous as a vigilante group. the lives of slaves in the South. They were given There were several types of Jim Crow laws enforced during this time. freedom from slavery by the Louisiana had a law that made black passengers ride in separate President of the United States. railroad cars. A black man named Homer Plessey took the railroad to They were declared to be court saying this law was unconstitutional. The U.S. Supreme Court citizens of the United States. ruled that as long as the railroad cars used by the blacks were As citizens, they were guaranteed certain rights by the Constitution.
  • How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics

    How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics

    GETTY CORUM IMAGES/SAMUEL How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics By Simon Clark July 2020 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics By Simon Clark July 2020 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 4 Tracing the origins of white supremacist ideas 13 How did this start, and how can it end? 16 Conclusion 17 About the author and acknowledgments 18 Endnotes Introduction and summary The United States is living through a moment of profound and positive change in attitudes toward race, with a large majority of citizens1 coming to grips with the deeply embedded historical legacy of racist structures and ideas. The recent protests and public reaction to George Floyd’s murder are a testament to many individu- als’ deep commitment to renewing the founding ideals of the republic. But there is another, more dangerous, side to this debate—one that seeks to rehabilitate toxic political notions of racial superiority, stokes fear of immigrants and minorities to inflame grievances for political ends, and attempts to build a notion of an embat- tled white majority which has to defend its power by any means necessary. These notions, once the preserve of fringe white nationalist groups, have increasingly infiltrated the mainstream of American political and cultural discussion, with poi- sonous results. For a starting point, one must look no further than President Donald Trump’s senior adviser for policy and chief speechwriter, Stephen Miller. In December 2019, the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Hatewatch published a cache of more than 900 emails2 Miller wrote to his contacts at Breitbart News before the 2016 presidential election.
  • Exploring Primary Sources for In-Depth Engagement with Americans and the Holocaust Experiencing History: Holocaust Sources in Context

    Exploring Primary Sources for In-Depth Engagement with Americans and the Holocaust Experiencing History: Holocaust Sources in Context

    EXPLORING PRIMARY SOURCES FOR IN-DEPTH ENGAGEMENT WITH AMERICANS AND THE HOLOCAUST EXPERIENCING HISTORY: HOLOCAUST SOURCES IN CONTEXT - WWW.EXPERIENCINGHISTORY.COM What is Experiencing History? Experiencing History is a digital learning tool that explores the Holocaust through unique, original, contexualized sources. With this tool, you can read, watch, and examine the experiences of everyday people to analyze how genocide unfolded. Learn about the Holocaust by engaging with a variety of sources from the period. Discover a diary, a letter, a newspaper article, or a policy paper; see a photograph, or watch film footage. Discuss the complex context from which the Holocaust emerged, and consider the importance of primary sources for understanding our world. Topic: Immigration and Refugees The following sources in Experiencing History illuminate the topic of immigration and the refugee crisis from a variety of perspectives. These sources ask us to consider: What did the vast bureaucratic web of immigration paperwork look like on a personal level? How did refugees understand their own plight as they were experiencing it? How did those advocating on their behalf frame their case for the American public? From Jewish refugees attempting to locate family members, to those trying to find safe haven, to those advocating on their behalf, these sources illuminate the complex questions that this topic raises through personal stories and reflections. Report on the work of the refugee committee, American Friends Service Committee, 1940 Report outlining the activities of the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) in refugee aid. These activities included both evacuating refugees from Europe and assisting in their adjustment to life in the United States.
  • The Viability of Multi-Party Litigation As a Tool for Social Engineering Six Decades After the Restrictive Covenant Cases

    The Viability of Multi-Party Litigation As a Tool for Social Engineering Six Decades After the Restrictive Covenant Cases

    University of Baltimore Law ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law All Faculty Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 2011 The iV ability of Multi-Party Litigation as a Tool for Social Engineering Six Decades after the Restrictive Covenant Cases José F. Anderson University of Baltimore School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/all_fac Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation The iV ability of Multi-Party Litigation as a Tool for Social Engineering Six Decades after the Restrictive Covenant Cases, 42 McGeorge L. Rev. 765 (2011) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Viability of Multi-Party Litigation as a Tool for Social Engineering Six Decades After the Restrictive Covenant Cases Jose Felipe Anderson ISSUE 4 Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1945914 The Viability of Multi-Party Litigation as a Tool for Social Engineering Six Decades After the Restrictive Covenant Cases Jos6 Felip6 Anderson* TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................... ..... 766 H. THE McGHEE V. SIPES BRIEF ................................... 774 A. McGhee Argument Against Judicial Enforcement of Restrictive Covenants .............................................. 776 B. History of Restrictive Covenants ............................. 777 C. Policy Arguments ......................................... 782 D. Deference to the UN Charter .......................................786 III. THE SHELLEY V. KRAEMER DECISION .............................. 787 IV. ANALYSIS .................................................. 789 V.
  • (In)Determinable: Race in Brazil and the United States

    (In)Determinable: Race in Brazil and the United States

    Michigan Journal of Race and Law Volume 14 2009 Determining the (In)Determinable: Race in Brazil and the United States D. Wendy Greene Cumberland School fo Law at Samford University Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Education Law Commons, Law and Race Commons, and the Law and Society Commons Recommended Citation D. W. Greene, Determining the (In)Determinable: Race in Brazil and the United States, 14 MICH. J. RACE & L. 143 (2009). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl/vol14/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of Race and Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DETERMINING THE (IN)DETERMINABLE: RACE IN BRAZIL AND THE UNITED STATES D. Wendy Greene* In recent years, the Brazilian states of Rio de Janeiro, So Paulo, and Mato Grasso du Sol have implemented race-conscious affirmative action programs in higher education. These states established admissions quotas in public universities '' for Afro-Brazilians or afrodescendentes. As a result, determining who is "Black has become a complex yet important undertaking in Brazil. Scholars and the general public alike have claimed that the determination of Blackness in Brazil is different than in the United States; determining Blackness in the United States is allegedly a simpler task than in Brazil. In Brazil it is widely acknowledged that most Brazilians are descendants of Aficans in light of the pervasive miscegenation that occurred during and after the Portuguese and Brazilian enslavement of * Assistant Professor of Law, Cumberland School of Law at Samford University.
  • Eugenicists, White Supremacists, and Marcus Garvey in Virginia, 1922-1927

    Eugenicists, White Supremacists, and Marcus Garvey in Virginia, 1922-1927

    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2001 Strange Bedfellows: Eugenicists, White Supremacists, and Marcus Garvey in Virginia, 1922-1927 Sarah L. Trembanis College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the African History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Trembanis, Sarah L., "Strange Bedfellows: Eugenicists, White Supremacists, and Marcus Garvey in Virginia, 1922-1927" (2001). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539624397. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-eg2s-rc14 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STRANGE BEDFELLOWS- Eugenicists, White Supremacists, and Marcus Garvey in Virginia, 1922-1927. A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Sarah L. Trembanis 2001 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Sarah L. Trembanis Approved, August 2001 (?L Ub Kimbe$y L. Phillips 'James McCord TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Acknowledgments iv Abstract v Introduction 2 Chapter 1: Dealing with “Mongrel Virginians” 25 Chapter 2: An Unlikely Alliance 47 Conclusion 61 Appendix One: An Act to Preserve Racial Integrity 64 Appendix Two: Model Eugenical Sterilization Law 67 Bibliography 74 Vita 81 iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First of all, I would like to thank my advisor, Professor Kimberly Phillips, for all of her invaluable suggestions and assistance.
  • Apartheid and Jim Crow: Drawing Lessons from South Africaâ•Žs

    Apartheid and Jim Crow: Drawing Lessons from South Africaâ•Žs

    Journal of Dispute Resolution Volume 2019 Issue 1 Article 16 2019 Apartheid and Jim Crow: Drawing Lessons from South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Benjamin Zinkel Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr Part of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons Recommended Citation Benjamin Zinkel, Apartheid and Jim Crow: Drawing Lessons from South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation, 2019 J. Disp. Resol. (2019) Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr/vol2019/iss1/16 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Dispute Resolution by an authorized editor of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Zinkel: Apartheid and Jim Crow: Drawing Lessons from South Africa’s Truth Apartheid and Jim Crow: Drawing Lessons from South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Benjamin Zinkel* I. INTRODUCTION South Africa and the United States are separated geographically, ethnically, and culturally. On the surface, these two nations appear very different. Both na- tions are separated by nearly 9,000 miles1, South Africa is a new democracy, while the United States was established over two hundred years2 ago, the two nations have very different climates, and the United States is much larger both in population and geography.3 However, South Africa and the United States share similar origins and histories. Both nations have culturally and ethnically diverse populations. Both South Africa and the United States were founded by colonists, and both nations instituted slavery.4 In the twentieth century, both nations discriminated against non- white citizens.