The Aristotelian Virtue and the Golden Mean (Nikomachaean Ethics II.6-7) By: John N

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

The Aristotelian virtue and the golden mean (Nikomachaean Ethics II.6-7) By: John N. Hatzopoulos ([email protected]) Regarding the golden mean in the Aristotelian virtue, most people in philosophy interpret the word "mesotis" used by Aristotle as "mean" Original: . περί μέν ούν φόβους και θάρρη ανδρεία μεσότης (II.6-7) . Peri men oun fovous kai tharrei andreia "mesotis" This is a wrong interpretation for three reasons: 1. "mesotis" = "mid-space" not "mean" 2. "Mean" without its pertinent variance has no scientific meaning (I may say that the mean distance between Empire State Building and the Status of Liberty is 1000 miles which makes no sense but if I say that the standard deviation - square root of variance- is 2000 miles it will make sense). However, the Greek word "mesotis" includes both the mean and the variance. Aristotle at that time did not know about statistics and for this reason is using an extensive discussion about how much a person eats, etc. Today we know about statistics and we can quantize the amount of food a person needs by analyzing a sample of people and getting the mean and the variance. In a similar way can be quantized most of human behavior, i.e. exit polls, etc. 3. Interpreting mesotis as a mean we actually destroy virtue by eliminating its degrees of freedom, thus making virtue impossible which is not what Aristotle says (μεσότης μέν ελευθερότης - mesotis men eleftherotis – mid-space is freedom), II.6-7 It must be noted that Aristotle, considering virtue as a mid‐space between two opposite extreme locations or badness, he actually is modeling the human error which if carefully studied, it can help human sciences to define precisely within human dimensions the boundaries of wrong and right. You may find more analysis on this in the links: http://www.aegean.gr/environment/labs/Remote_sensing/EnglishBlock/publications/Hatzopoulos‐Hsss‐Us.pdf http://www.webmazine.org/issues/bull237/documents/rightWrong.pdf Any comment on the material presented in these links will be greatly appreciated. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

SOCRATES in the CLASSROOM Rationales and Effects of Philosophizing with Children Ann S
SOCRATES IN THE CLASSROOM Rationales and Effects of Philosophizing with Children Ann S. Pihlgren Socrates in the Classroom Rationales and Effects of Philosophizing with Children Ann S. Pihlgren Stockholm University ©Ann S. Pihlgren, Stockholm 2008 Cover: Björn S. Eriksson ISSN 1104-1625-146 ISBN (978-91-7155-598-4) Printed in Sweden by Elanders Sverige AB Distributor: Stockholm University, Department of Education To Kjell with love and gratitude. Contents Contents ........................................................................................................ vii Preface ............................................................................................................ 1 1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 3 1.1 Philosophizing and teaching ethics ..................................................................... 4 1.2 Some guidance for the reader ............................................................................ 5 1.3 Considerations ................................................................................................... 8 2 Research Goals and Design .................................................................. 9 2.1 Classroom interaction ......................................................................................... 9 2.2 Studying Socratic interaction ............................................................................ 10 2.3 Research questions .........................................................................................
[Show full text]
Kenneth Hamilton
Kenneth Hamilton THE FALSE GLITTER OF THE GOLDEN MEAN A cYNICAL OPINION holds that the great thinkers of the past had but one thing in common-their thoughts were wrong. It may be more nearly true to say that all great thinkers tend to encourage wrong thinking in us. For we are inclined to take over the phrases they have made famous, imagining that we have been given magic formulae to solve our problems without having to do any thinking ourselves. A case in point is Aristotle's doctrine of the Mean. This doctrine has a certain cogency in the context of classical ethics: that, and no more than that. Yet today it is often lifted out of its context and put forward as a general principle both simple and authoritative. The Good (it is urged) stands in a middle place; and therefore any~ thing which can be shown to occupy a middle place must be a Good Thing. Obviously, Aristotle cannot be blamed for later distortions of his doctrine. And the doctrine of the Mean was not entirely his invention. Tracing virtue to a "middle way" between extremes was almost a habit of the Greeks, as we learn from Plato, who tells us of the inscription "Nothing in excess" in the temple at Delphi. Nevertheless, Aristotle's account of the Mean in the Nichomachean Ethics is de cisive in the history of this particular tradition. The person who "loves well the Golden Mean" (the phrase is from Horace) may not have the Ethics directly in mind, but the argument of that treatise will lie at the back of what he believes.
[Show full text]
Acquainting Yourself with Ethics a Tour of the Ethics Hall of Fame
1 Acquainting Yourself with Ethics A Tour of the Ethics Hall of Fame They honestly consider they are doing the right thing. E.W. Elkington, 1907, on New Guinea Cannibals Or are you a clear thinker examining what is good and useful for society and spending your life in building what is useful and destroying what is harmful? Kahlil Gibran, Mirrors of the Soul Good laws lead to the making of better ones; bad laws bring about worse. As soon as any man says of the affairs of the State, “What does it matter to me?” the State may be given up for lost. Rousseau The present moral crisis is due among other things to the demand for a moral code which is intellectually respectable. R. Niebuhr 1 2ETHICS IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE:IN SEARCH OF THE TRUTH What You Will Learn from This Chapter To understand the foundation of ethics, you should learn the virtue of knowledge and reasoning, the sources of intellect, the nature of truth, the nature of reality, the nature of morality, the nature of goodness, the relationship between actions and consequences, determinism and intentionalism, and the image of the ethical person. You will also learn the reasoning process, Plato’s divided line, the definition of morality and ethics, the grammar of goodness, the principle of summum bonum, and the utilitarianism measure. Key Terms and Definitions Reasoning is a pure method of thinking by which proper conclusions are reached through abstract thought processes. The Divided Line is Plato’s theory of knowledge. It characterizes four levels of knowledge.
[Show full text]
DR. LEONARD PEIKOFF Lecture 5 a REVOLUTION
Founders of Western Philosophy: Thales to Hume a 12-lecture course by DR. LEONARD PEIKOFF Edited by LINDA REARDAN, Ph.D. Lecture 5 A REVOLUTION: THE BIRTH OF REASON, PART II A Publication of CONTENTS Preface iv 1. Aristotle’s Teleology 2 2. The Unmoved Mover 8 3. Refutation of Zeno’s Paradoxes 15 4. Aristotle’s Psychology: The Natural Soul 17 5. Psychology Continued: Sense-Perception and Reason 22 6. Prime Matter and the Levels of Reality 29 7. Aristotle’s Ethics: Self-Realization and the Golden Mean 35 8. Political Philosophy 57 9. Conclusion 61 Study Questions 65 iii Lecture 5 A REVOLUTION: THE BIRTH OF REASON, PART II Last week we surveyed Aristotle’s epistemology and some of the essentials of his metaphysics. In regard to metaphysics, we said that reality for Aristotle is this world, the world in which we live, the world of concrete individual things as perceived through man’s senses. We said that for Aristotle each individual object, each primary substance, is comprised of two elements: a univer- salizing element, which constitutes the basis for our putting it into a certain class and ascribing to it a certain nature; and an individuating element, which constitutes the basis of its unique- ness and makes it a this. Aristotle’s technical terms for these two elements, you recall, are “form” and “matter.” Matter is the stuff or material compris- ing a thing; form represents its structure or organization. In these terms, change, we said, is the process of matter taking on new form, so that change in no way involves a contradiction; it is eminently logical, rational, scientifically intelligible.
[Show full text]
Plato and Aristotle on the Vocation of the Philosopher
CHAPTER ONE PLATO AND ARISTOTLE ON THE VOCATION OF THE PHILOSOPHER Lecture I The enterprise called philosophy appears ﬁrst in the writings of Plato and Aristotle. It is in the Platonic dialogues and in the treatises or lec- tures of Aristotle that Philosophy is for the ﬁrst time discussed exten- sively, put forth as the highest and most proper or most worthy human endeavor, and defended against its multitudinous adversaries. Certainly there were philosophers before Plato, but their writings were either non-existent, or have survived only in fragmentary fashion. We learn about them for the most part from what we would call today secondary sources. To what extent Plato and Aristotle are reliable in their reports of their predecessors will forever remain a moot question, notwithstanding the voluminous scholarship which attempts to answer just this question. But there is no gainsaying that not only do all major philosophic problems make their appearance in the writings of the two major Greek philosophers, there is hardly a problem which interests them more and which is always present in their minds—sometimes in the back of their minds—than the question of philosophy itself, and of the vocation of the philosopher. My intention is to discuss the two-fold meaning of the term voca- tion: vocation as occupation or activity, and vocation as calling or duty. Or if you will, the philosopher’s duty to himself and the philoso- pher’s duty to others. We all know that philosophy is a problematic term, and we have just been reminded that “vocation” is also an equivocal term.
[Show full text]
Imagine There's a Heaven Reasonable Religion, Religious Reason
101 IMAGINE THERE’S A HEAVEN REASONABLE RELIGION, RELIGIOUS REASON Ramon Nadres Abstract Religious fundamentalism, on the one hand, as manifested in terrorist activity and extreme rationalism which leads to atheism on the other seem to be untenable choices for any honest man. Both put faith and reason at odds with one another. If neither is acceptable, then there must be a middle way. Thomas Aquinas has spoken about the medium virtutis, the golden mean, when it comes to virtuous acts, which avoid vicious extremes in any moral act. How do we find this medium virtutis between faith and reason? After looking at prudence as the recta ratio agibilium and seeing that the guide for the recta ratio is the truth, we then discover that, for moral truth, which is involved in the medium virtutis of faith and reason, the bridging criterion is human nature, and that reason spans not only the empirical realm, but the philosophical and supernatural realms as well. Key words Faith. Reason. Natural Law. Epistemology. Moral Philosophy. Abstrak Baik fundamentalisme-radikalisme agama maupun rasionalisme ekstrem bukanlah jalan menuju kebaikan dan kebijaksanaan. Dalam dua situasi ekstrem itu, iman dan akal budi saling berlawanan. Di tengah ketegangan antara iman dan akal budi, Thomas Aquino mengajarkan medium virtutis, yakni jalan tengah yang terbaik yang berada di antara dua ekstrem dari tindakan-tindakan yang dapat dinilai moral. Bagaimana kita bisa menemukan medium virtutis antara iman dan akal budi? Yakni dengan memeriksa arti recta ratio agibilium di dalam kebijaksanaan (prudentia) dan setelah melihat bahwa recta ratio adalah yang mengantar kita kepada apa yang benar.
[Show full text]
Aristotle in a Box Dr
Aristotle in a Box Dr. Jane Drexler reflects on philosophical ideas through the lens of CrossFit. It’s like Philosophy 101 with CrossFit as the frame—or perhaps CrossFit 101 with philosophy as the frame. By Dr. Jane Drexler February 2013 CrossFit as Eudaimonia “Men will be good or bad builders as a result of building well or badly.” —Aristotle Right around Day 12 of a 30-day nutrition challenge, I start to feel good. The first week and a half feels like my body is on strike— “Where the hell is my sugar?”—and there are some mornings I have difficulty imagining ever feeling good again. But then, one day, that feeling of weary despair just sort of floats off; my eyes are bright, my legs have bounce, my mind is clear, and I feel on my way to a better self. Day 12 is when I start to believe Aristotle again. I start to believe again that the road to a good life—an excellent, happy life—requires difficult, uncomfortable steps for both mind and body. I start to believe again that the road is long but gets easier, that on the road we are helped along by our friendships, by courage and by self-love, each of which are, in turn, nourished as we take each step. I start to believe again in a fundamental truth: each success gets imprinted on my character, and I become a little bit more “one-who-succeeds.” Kim BellaVance 1 of 6 Copyright © 2013 CrossFit, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Subscription info at journal.crossfit.com CrossFit is a registered trademark ® of CrossFit, Inc.
[Show full text]
P515 (§ 29794) Fall 2009 History of the Problem of Universals in the Middle Ages
P401 (§ 11962)/P515 (§ 29794) Fall 2009 History of the Problem of Universals in the Middle Ages Office Hours: E-mail: Title of the course: History of the Problem of Universals in the Middle Ages. This course is a combined undergraduate/graduate course, being offered under two simultaneous numbers: P401 for the undergraduate graduate version and P515 for the graduate version. The fact that we have two “instances” of what is in effect exactly the same course is perhaps an illustration of the very problem of universals that is the topic of this course. (I’ll say more about what that problem is in a moment.) But it’s not really exactly the same course. I will be expecting an appropriately more ambitious term-papers and examination answers from those of you taking this course under the graduate number. Handouts: (1) Syllabus Lectures: 2:30–3:45 PM Mondays & Wednesdays. Format: Lecture with some questions. Required Texts: Paul Vincent Spade, Five Texts on the Mediaeval Problem of Universals: Porphyry, Boethius, Abelard, Duns Scotus, Ockham, (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1994). Paul Vincent Spade, History of the Problem of Universals in the Middle Ages: Notes and Texts. A packet of materials containing additional notes on the translations in Five Texts, together with some further translations. It comes to 191 pages, and is available from Mr. Copy, 501 E. 10th St. (= 10th & Dunn) (334- 2679). ($29.90 plus tax.) 2 Bring these first two items to class with you regularly; I will be frequently referring to particular passages in them. Thomas Aquinas, On Being and Essence, Armand Maurer, tr.
[Show full text]
Teleological Functionalist Naturalism – As the Type of Rationality
20 ARISTOTLE’S BIOCOSMOLOGY – TELEOLOGICAL FUNCTIONALIST NATURALISM – AS THE TYPE OF RATIONALITY Konstantin S. KHROUTSKI1 ABSTRACT. The author strongly urges to rehabilitate the genuine significance of Aristotle’s supersystem of knowledge as the autonomic (one of the Three) Type of rationality – Type of (Bio)cosmology. First and foremost, we need to reinstate the true meaning of Aristotle’s Organicistic (Four-causal) aetiology, wherein all Four causes are telic (teleodriven): hyletic (which is called nowadays as “material”); organic or morphogenetic (“formal”); generative (“efficient”); telic or Functionalist (“final”). As we substantiate, modern perception (and conventional apprehension) of “material” and “formal” causes, as well as the removal of telic causes from modern scientific environment demonstrates a bad misinterpretation of Aristotle’s (Bio)cosmology – the (super)system of scholarly Organicist knowledge – and the autonomic atemporal (one of the Three) Type of rationality (of Functionalist naturalism). Likewise, an attempt is to introduce the Bipolar and Triadic essence of Aristotle’s teleological (Functionalist) naturalism that comprehensively encompasses (substantiates) all the domains of science and philosophy, thus uniting the knowledge of all kinds into the one overall scheme (Biocosmology or OrganonKosmology). However, during the long time of cultural history – Aristotle’s rational heritage had been badly misinterpreted and is out of use at present. This is an absolutely unacceptable state of things – a culturally ‘sick-world’. Therein, progression of the current ‘cosmological insufficiency’ takes place, which occurrence makes impossible at present time the further realization (even planning) of a satisfactory intellectual and cultural life, first of all the safe and wholesome global sociocultural evolution. In this light, therefore, the author’s work (within the general activity of the Biocosmological Association) – is the impetus to start (relying on Aristotle’s Biocosmology) the process of overcoming the specified ‘cosmological insufficiency’.
[Show full text]
Aristotelian Pluralism and Diversity: the Conditions for Civic Education and the Common Good
[Expositions 8.1 (2014) 100–121] Expositions (online) ISSN: 1747–5376 Aristotelian Pluralism and Diversity: The Conditions for Civic Education and the Common Good LEE TREPANIER Saginaw Valley State University With the decline in social capital and the rise of the immigrant populace in the United States, there is renewed interest in civic education as a way to provide a meaningful understanding of citizenship and thereby greater civic integration into American political life.1 Although public education is often seen as a repository and conveyance of civic education, it is also transmitted through institutions in civil society, such as the family, religious organizations, and the mass media.2 However, scholars focus on public schools because studies have demonstrated that they are the most effective institutions in delivering civic education.3 Furthermore, most states have an explicit mission to prepare students for citizenship by requiring some sort of civic education in their schools. It is only in schools where a deliberate type of instruction about civics takes place, resulting in a substantial increase in students’ understanding of their roles and responsibilities as citizens.4 Given the importance of public schools in civic education, it would appear that Spartan and Socratic models of education would be preferred. In both regimes, the political community removes the institutions of civil society, like the family, from the civic education of children so there are no obstacles to the state teaching them. Substituting itself for their families, the political community provides a civic education that is common to all children, as opposed to the Athenian version where education is practiced privately, yielding disparate lessons about citizenship.
[Show full text]
Virtue Ethics Script.Pdf
Ethics Script: Virtue Ethics Introduction Virtue ethics determines morality or “goodness” by a person’s interconnected judgments, decisions, motivations, and behaviors that result from their character or “second nature.” Your morality is determined by why you do what you do, not the action itself or even the consequence. This in turn reveals the strength of your character. Aristotle & Virtue The origins of Virtue Ethics come from ancient Greece where, from 469-399 BCE, Socrates philosophized about morality. According to Socrates, doing wrong “will harm and corrupt that part of ourselves that is improved by just actions and destroyed by unjust actions.” He was eventually executed by the Athenian state and even turned down a chance to escape, choosing death over the corruption of his character. Virtue ethics lived on through his pupil Plato but most virtue ethics theories take their inspiration from Aristotle (Plato’s pupil) who further dissected what it means to be virtuous. Integration of Self Aristotle defined a virtuous person as someone who has ideal character traits and that the strength of character is dependent on the integration of “non-rational self” (feelings, emotions, and desires) and “rational self” (reason and wisdom). The mean of these two components comprises moral virtue, and moral virtue is a necessity for the highest good or eudaimonia. The Golden Mean Moral virtue lies in a mean because it is dynamic and dependent on both the situation and the person in question. It involves using your reason and wisdom, having the appropriate amount of desire, feeling, and emotion. Your strength of character is found between an excess and a deficiency; Aristotle called this the “golden mean.” Example: The Golden Mean A courageous person feels and acts according to merits of a situation.
[Show full text]
Aristotle's Ethics
PHI102 EXAMEN PHILOSOPHICUM – RANI LILL ANJUM Lecture 6: Aristotle’s Ethics What makes us Human? Happiness has intrinsic value. Money only has instrumental In Aristotle’s ontology, all things have both Form and Matter. The value. We want it for what we can get with it. Form is what makes something essentially the kind of thing The greatest Happiness (EUDAIMONIA) has three qualities that that it is. X is a Chair. X is a Horse. What is, then, the Form of make it the ultimate aim or TELOS of all our actions: Human? What makes us essentially human? . Happiness is desirable in itself. We saw in Plato that we should try to be like our Form: the more . Happiness is not desirable because it brings other goods. we resemble the perfect, ideal Form, the better we are as . All other goods are desirable because they lead to Happiness. Humans. Aristotle did not believe in separately existing non- material Forms, but he did believe that our Form gives us a potential to fulfil. Happiness = living a life of virtue To be a virtuous human, we should fulfil our function as Humans. Aristotle thought that Happiness (EUDAIMONIA) comes from living But what is this function? In order to see this, we must look at the good life. This is not primarily a life of pleasure, but of what it is that distinguishes humans from other things. virtue (ARETE). We become happy when we fulfil our potential in a virtuous way. But we need both intellectual and moral virtues. We must also actualise potentials of our rational soul.
[Show full text]