Pulmonary Hypertension Managment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pulmonary Hypertension Managment Pulmonary Hypertension Managment Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a disease characterized by elevated pulmonary artery pressure (mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥20 mmHg at rest with a pulmonary vascular resistance ≥3 Wood units). Risk factor: Drug- and toxin like appetite suppressants, toxic rapeseed oil, and benfluorex and possibly cocaine, phenylpropanolamine, St. John's Wort, dasatinib, and interferon. Heart failure (preserved LVEF or reduced LVEF) Restrictive lung disease Obstructive lung disease Hypoxia without lung disease Developmental lung disorders Chronic thromboembolic PH Sign and Symptoms: Dyspnea and fatigue ●Symptoms of right ventricular (RV) failure like •Exertional chest pain •Exertional syncope •Weight gain from edema •Anorexia and/or abdominal pain and swelling. •exertion intolerance Diagnostic tests: Echocardiography Doppler echocardiography pulmonary function testing: Full PFTs (spirometry, lung volumes, diffusing capacity) Chest radiography Arterial blood oxygenation Treatment The goals of treatment are to alleviate symptoms, improve the quality of life, slow the progression of the disease, and improve survival Nonpharmacologic Therapy: Oxygen therapy: Continuous oxygen administration remains the cornerstone of therapy in patients with group 3 PH Oxygen should be considered for all patients with PH plus hypoxemia, the goal of oxygen therapy to maintain the O2 sat above 90 % at rest. Vaccinations: Pulmonary hypertension is considered a chronic disease and as such, patients should be immunized with all age-appropriate as well as influenza and pneumococcal pneumonia vaccines. Exercise, training was consistently associated with improved exercise capacity, muscular function, quality of life, and possibly right ventricular function and pulmonary hemodynamics, resulted in improved exercise capacity, and health-related quality of life Pharmacologic Therapy: PRIMARY THERAPY FOR PH Primary therapy refers to treatment that is directed at the underlying cause of the PH. It is warranted in nearly all patients with PH. The disease severity should be reassessed following primary therapy, in order to determine whether advanced therapy is indicated. Group 1 PAH: Patients with group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH): There are no effective primary therapies for most types of group 1 PAH. As a result, PH-specific therapy is often needed Group 2 PH: Patients with group 2 PH have PH secondary to left heart disease with chronic left atrial and pulmonary venous hypertension: rimary therapy for group 2 PH consists of treatment of the underlying heart disease Group 3 PH: Patients with group 3 PH have PH secondary to various causes of hypoxemia: Primary therapy for group 3 PH consists of treatment of the underlying cause of hypoxemia and correction of the hypoxemia with supplemental oxygen Group 4 PH: Patients with group 4 PH have PH due to thromboembolic or other occlusion of the proximal or distal pulmonary vasculature: Anticoagulation is primary medical therapy for patients with group 4 PH. The value of anticoagulant therapy for group 4 PH is an extrapolation of the clinical evidence that anticoagulation prevents recurrent pulmonary embolism. Data suggesting that anticoagulation is beneficial in patients with group 4 PH are lacking. Surgical thromboendarterectomy is primary surgical therapy for selected patients with thromboembolic obstruction of the proximal pulmonary arteries . Prior to proceeding with this invasive approach, a three-month period of anticoagulation is required and patients must remain severely incapacitated due to PH Balloon angioplasty of the pulmonary artery is also a consideration in patients who are not suitable candidates for surgery. Group 5 PH: Group 5 PH includes PH with unclear multifactorial mechanisms. 1-Diuretics Patients with fluid retention from PH-related right ventricle failure (RV) may benefit from diuretics. Diuretics diminish hepatic congestion, peripheral edema, and pleural effusions and may be of particular benefit in those in whom interventricular sepal deviation from elevated RV pressure impairs left ventricle output. However, diuretics should be administered with caution. Since patients with PH are pre-load dependent, over-diuresis may result in under-filling of the RV, and a decline in RV stroke volume, thereby reducing left ventricle (LV) stroke volume resulting in systemic hypotension and sometimes shock. In addition, diuretics can be associated with arrhythmias induced by hypokalemia, and metabolic alkalosis (which can depress ventilation). Most diuretic is administered orally in the chronic setting. However, intravenous diuresis may be more effective in the acute setting, when it can be given as a bolus dose or a continuous infusion (which may be better tolerated hemodynamically in those with borderline blood pressure). Occasionally, the increased right ventricular pressure is so severe that diuretics are ineffective; in such cases, ultrafiltration may be beneficial. 2-Oxygen therapy: Continuous oxygen administration remains the cornerstone of therapy in patients with group 3 PH Oxygen is generally administered at 1 to 4 L/min via nasal prongs and adjusted to maintain the oxygen saturation above 90 percent at rest and, if possible, with exercise and sleep 3-Anticoagulation: Anticoagulation is indicated in patients with group 4 PH and not typically administered to those with group 2, 3, or 5. However, anticoagulation in patients with group 1 PAH is controversial; in general anticoagulation has fallen out of favor in this population and we suggest that anticoagulant therapy be administered on a case-by- case basis according to the clinician's assessment of the risks and benefits Limited experience was with direct oral anticoagulants (eg, direct thrombin or factor . Xa inhibitors) makes warfarin the anticoagulant of choice, with a therapeutic goal of an international normalized ratio (INR) of approximately 2.0. Many centers in the US target a range of 1.5 to 2.5 with no bridging for temporary interruptions. The risk of bleeding on anticoagulation (warfarin) may differ among patients with different types of PH. Patients with PH frequently have other risk factors for thromboembolism (eg, atrial fibrillation, severe left heart failure) that may warrant anticoagulation. Anticoagulation for these conditions should be assessed independently 4-Digoxin: Digoxin therapy has been shown to have both beneficial effects and drawbacks: Digoxin improves the left ventricular EF of patients with group 3 PH due to COPD and biventricular failure However, these patients may be more sensitive than most patients to digitalis toxicity and require close monitoring. Digoxin helps control the heart rate of patients who have supraventricular tachycardias associated with right ventricular dysfunction Verapamil is preferred for multifocal atrial tachycardia, unless there is concurrent left ventricular failure. No data are available on the long-term effects of digoxin in patients with group 1 PAH. 5- Exercise 6- Vaccinations PULMONARY HYPERTENSION-SPECIFIC THERAPY Pulmonary hypertension (PH)-specific therapy is directed at the pulmonary hypertension (PH) itself (PH-targeted therapy), rather than the underlying cause of the PH. PH-specific therapy should not be administered unless a diagnostic right heart catheterization (RHC) and extensive investigations for the etiology of PH have been performed. Additionally, most patients with group 1 PAH, in particular, those with idiopathic PAH, heritable PAH, and anorexigen-induced PAH, should also undergo vasoreactivity testing during RHC which facilitates agent selection PH-specific therapy is widely accepted for many patients with group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). In contrast, it should only be administered on a case-by- case basis for patients with group 3 PH, group 4 PH, or group 5 PH, after carefully weighing the risks versus the benefits. Advanced therapy should NOT be administered to most patients with group 2 PH. After initiating therapy, most patients are followed up within four to six weeks to evaluate the clinical and hemodynamic response. Patients with refractory PAH may require alternate or combination therapy For those who are refractory to all medical interventions, lung transplantation or creation of a right to left shunt by atrial septostomy are options 1-Calcium channel blockers: Some patients who are vasoreactive and receive CCB therapy with a Amlodipine or diltiazem can achieve prolonged survival, sustained functional improvement, and hemodynamic improvement. CCB therapy can be initiated with either long- acting nifedipine (30 mg/day) or diltiazem (120 mg/day), then increased to the maximal tolerated dose. Short-acting nifedipine should NOT be used. 2- Prostacyclin pathway agonists: Epoprostenol: Intravenous epoprostenol (prostacyclin; PGI2) improves hemodynamic parameters, functional capacity, and survival in patients with IPAH Delivered continuously through a permanently implanted central venous catheter using a portable infusion pump. It is usually initiated at doses of 1 to 2 ng/kg per min and increased by 1 to 2 ng/kg per min every one to two days as tolerated. Treprostinil can be given intravenously or subcutaneously or inhaled Iloprost: Inhaled iloprost has theoretical advantages in targeting the lung vasculature and does not require intravenous administration the main disadvantage is the need for frequent administration (six to nine times per day) Selexipag is an oral selective non-prostanoid prostacyclin receptor
Recommended publications
  • Benfluorex: What Use? a SECOND LOOK POOR ASSESSMENT FILE
    New products necessitating blood transfusions 3- “Paclitaxel” Prescr Intern 1994; 3 (14): 164-165. Literature 4- Rowisky EK et al. “Phase I and pharmacolog- occurred in 37% of patients (9). ic study of topotecan: a novel topoisomerase I The most frequent non haematologi- Our literature search was based on systematic inhibitor” J Clin Oncol 1992; 10: 647-656. cal side effects were nausea (68.1% of scrutiny of contents listings of the main inter- 5- Verweij L et al. “Phase I and pharmacokinet- ics study of topotecan, a new topoisomerase I patients, severe in 6.1% of patients), national journals and Current Contents at inhibitor” Ann Oncol 1993; 4: 673-678. vomiting (44.3%, severe in 4.5%), hair the Prescrire library, and on reference texts 6- Saltz L et al. “Phase I clinical and pharmacol- in clinical pharmacology (Martindale The ogy study of topotecan given daily for 5 consecu- loss (56.9%), fatigue (44.5%, severe in Extra Pharmacopoeia 31st ed., etc.). We also tive days to patients with advanced solid tumors, 6%), diarrhoea (26.1%, severe in 3.4%), consulted CD-ROM versions of Medline (1981- with attempt at dose intensification using recom- and stomatitis (20.2%, severe in 2%) (9). March 1998), Embase Drugs and binant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor” J Pharmacology (1991-January 1998), Cochrane Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85 (18): 1499-1507. Paclitaxel solution contains a solvent, 7- Kudelka AP et al. “Phase II study of intravenous Cremophor EL°, that is incompatible with (1998, issue 1), Medidoc (1991-1994) and topotecan as a 5-day infusion for refractory epithe- Reactions (1983-June 1997), and the Minitel lial ovarian carcinoma” J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: the use of PVC infusion devices and war- version of the Pascal database up to 1552-1557.
    [Show full text]
  • Obesity Drugs: Too Much Harm, for Far Too Long
    Obesity drugs: too much harm, for far too long In 2016, a British team studied the causes for the market withdrawals of weight-loss drugs. They identified 25 drugs that had been withdrawn from markets around the world between 1964 and 2009. The mechanism of 22 of these drugs involved monoamine neurotransmitters (dopamine, noradrenaline or serotonin); examples include benfluorex, fenfluramine, phentermine (combined with topiramate in the United States) and sibutramine. One drug, rimonabant, was a cannabinoid EDITORIAL derivative, and the two others acted on the thyroid (1). 80% of the market withdrawals were based on data from spontaneous reports, involving cardiac disorders for 8 drugs, psychiatric disorders for 7 drugs, and abuse or dependence for 13 drugs. Drug-attributed deaths had occurred with 7 of the drugs. The median time between market introduction and the first report of a serious adverse effect was 10 years; and the median time between the first report of a serious adverse effect and the first market withdrawal anywhere in the world was 11 years. Fenfluramine was marketed for 24 years before its worldwide withdrawal in 1997 for heart valve disease. Benfluorex was marketed in France for 33 years before its withdrawal in 2009 for cardiotoxicity; yet the heart valve disorders resembled those caused by fenfluramine and the chemical structures of these two drugs are very similar (2). In France, phentermine was marketed from 1962 to 1988. Sibutramine was withdrawn in Europe in 2010, about 9 years after authorisation; and rimonabant was withdrawn in Europe in 2009, about 2 years after authorisation (1,3,4).
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceuticals Appendix
    )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 3 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. Product CAS No. Product CAS No. ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ADAPALENE 106685-40-9 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ADAPROLOL 101479-70-3 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ADEMETIONINE 17176-17-9 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ADENOSINE PHOSPHATE 61-19-8 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ADIBENDAN 100510-33-6 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ADICILLIN 525-94-0 ACAMPROSATE 77337-76-9 ADIMOLOL 78459-19-5 ACAPRAZINE 55485-20-6 ADINAZOLAM 37115-32-5 ACARBOSE 56180-94-0 ADIPHENINE 64-95-9 ACEBROCHOL 514-50-1 ADIPIODONE 606-17-7 ACEBURIC ACID 26976-72-7 ADITEREN 56066-19-4 ACEBUTOLOL 37517-30-9 ADITOPRIME 56066-63-8 ACECAINIDE 32795-44-1 ADOSOPINE 88124-26-9 ACECARBROMAL 77-66-7 ADOZELESIN 110314-48-2 ACECLIDINE 827-61-2 ADRAFINIL 63547-13-7 ACECLOFENAC 89796-99-6 ADRENALONE 99-45-6 ACEDAPSONE 77-46-3 AFALANINE 2901-75-9 ACEDIASULFONE SODIUM 127-60-6 AFLOQUALONE 56287-74-2 ACEDOBEN 556-08-1 AFUROLOL 65776-67-2 ACEFLURANOL 80595-73-9 AGANODINE 86696-87-9 ACEFURTIAMINE 10072-48-7 AKLOMIDE 3011-89-0 ACEFYLLINE CLOFIBROL 70788-27-1
    [Show full text]
  • The Curtailment of the European Medicines Agency’S Policy on Access to Documents
    Supplementary Online Content Doshi P. Transparency interrupted: the curtailment of the European Medicines Agency’s policy on access to documents. JAMA Intern Med. Published online August 19, 2013. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9989 eAppendix. Table of European Medicines Agency Freedom of Information Requests Snapshot Dated June 4, 2013 This supplementary material has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work. © 2013 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 10/02/2021 Category of documents Category of documents Affiliation according to Closed Product / subject Pages requested requested social and occupational Received Pending Replied released DOSSIER NON-DOSSIER profile Open Mixed documents Academia/Research Avandia (rosiglitazone) institute 14/12/10 Closed 13/01/11 1,048 Somatropin Studies Other 13/12/10 Closed 14/01/11 0 Tasocitinib Dossier, SA Legal 16/12/10 Closed 18/01/11 0 Duloxetines: Module 5 Ariclaim; Cymbalta; Xeristar; Yentreve Healthcare professional 15/12/10 Closed 16/05/11 13,731 Infanrix HepB Mixed documents Legal 16/12/10 Closed 16/02/11 247 AR, minutes, Dossier, CSR Avonex (interferon beta-1a) Healthcare professional 30/11/10 Closed 04/02/11 18 Travatan (travoprost) AR, PSUR Media 21/12/10 Closed 21/01/11 474 PhVWP H1N1 (pandemic influenza vaccine) EU Institution (EC etc) 20/10/10 Closed 08/02/11 42 Plavix (clopidogrel) CSR Media 04/01/11 Closed 06/09/12 70,291 Referral documents Agreal (veralipride) Patients organisation
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Harmonized Tariff Schedule Pharmaceuticals Appendix
    Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2014) (Rev. 1) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2014) (Rev. 1) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 2 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. ABACAVIR 136470-78-5 ACEVALTRATE 25161-41-5 ABAFUNGIN 129639-79-8 ACEXAMIC ACID 57-08-9 ABAGOVOMAB 792921-10-9 ACICLOVIR 59277-89-3 ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ACIFRAN 72420-38-3 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ACIPIMOX 51037-30-0 ABAPERIDONE 183849-43-6 ACITAZANOLAST 114607-46-4 ABARELIX 183552-38-7 ACITEMATE 101197-99-3 ABATACEPT 332348-12-6 ACITRETIN 55079-83-9 ABCIXIMAB 143653-53-6 ACIVICIN 42228-92-2 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ACLANTATE 39633-62-0 ABETIMUS 167362-48-3 ACLARUBICIN 57576-44-0 ABIRATERONE 154229-19-3 ACLATONIUM NAPADISILATE 55077-30-0 ABITESARTAN 137882-98-5 ACLIDINIUM BROMIDE 320345-99-1 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ACODAZOLE 79152-85-5 ABRINEURIN 178535-93-8 ACOLBIFENE 182167-02-8 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ACONIAZIDE 13410-86-1 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ACOTIAMIDE 185106-16-5
    [Show full text]
  • Government Gazette
    Government Gazette REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Regulation Gazette No. 7636 Vol. 454 Pretoria 10 April 2003 No. 24727 AIDS HELPLINE: 0800-0123-22 Prevention is the cure I STAATSKOERANT, 10 APRIL 2003 No. 24727 3 GOVERNMENT NOTICES GOEWERMENTSKENNISGEWINGS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DEPARTEMENT VAN GESONDHEID NO. R. 509 10 April 2003 SCHEDULES The Minister of Health has, in terms of section 22A(2) of the Medicines and Related Substances Act, 1965 (Act No. 101 of 1965), on the recommendation of the Medicines Control Council, made the Schedulesin the Schedule SCHEDULE I In these Schedules, "the Act" meansthe Medicines and Related SubstancesAct, 1965 (Act No. 101 of 1965) SCHEDULE 0 (a) All substancesreferred to in thisSchedule are excluded when specifically packed, labelled and usedfor - (i) industrialpurposes including the manufacture or compounding of consumer items or products which have no pharmacological oraction medicinal purpose, which are intended to be ingested by man or animals as food, or applied to the body as a cosmetic, and which are approved for such use in terms of the Foodstuffs, Cosmetics and Disinfectants Act, 1972 (Act No. 54 of 1972) or registeredin terms of theFertilizers, Farm Feeds, Agricultural Remedies and Stock Remedies Act, 1947 (Act No. 36 of 1947); and (ii)analytical laboratory purposes. (b) All substances referred to in this Schedule include the following: 4 No. 24727 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 10 APRIL 2003 (i) The saltsand esters of suchsub2ances,+vhere the existence of such salts and esters is possible; and (ii) All preparationsand mixtures of suchsubstances where such preparations and mixtures arenot expressly excluded. This Schedule includesall substances subject to registration in termsof the Act and which are not listed in anyof the other Schedules.
    [Show full text]
  • Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization
    No. 31874 Multilateral Marrakesh Agreement establishing the World Trade Organ ization (with final act, annexes and protocol). Concluded at Marrakesh on 15 April 1994 Authentic texts: English, French and Spanish. Registered by the Director-General of the World Trade Organization, acting on behalf of the Parties, on 1 June 1995. Multilat ral Accord de Marrakech instituant l©Organisation mondiale du commerce (avec acte final, annexes et protocole). Conclu Marrakech le 15 avril 1994 Textes authentiques : anglais, français et espagnol. Enregistré par le Directeur général de l'Organisation mondiale du com merce, agissant au nom des Parties, le 1er juin 1995. Vol. 1867, 1-31874 4_________United Nations — Treaty Series • Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 1995 Table of contents Table des matières Indice [Volume 1867] FINAL ACT EMBODYING THE RESULTS OF THE URUGUAY ROUND OF MULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS ACTE FINAL REPRENANT LES RESULTATS DES NEGOCIATIONS COMMERCIALES MULTILATERALES DU CYCLE D©URUGUAY ACTA FINAL EN QUE SE INCORPOR N LOS RESULTADOS DE LA RONDA URUGUAY DE NEGOCIACIONES COMERCIALES MULTILATERALES SIGNATURES - SIGNATURES - FIRMAS MINISTERIAL DECISIONS, DECLARATIONS AND UNDERSTANDING DECISIONS, DECLARATIONS ET MEMORANDUM D©ACCORD MINISTERIELS DECISIONES, DECLARACIONES Y ENTEND MIENTO MINISTERIALES MARRAKESH AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION ACCORD DE MARRAKECH INSTITUANT L©ORGANISATION MONDIALE DU COMMERCE ACUERDO DE MARRAKECH POR EL QUE SE ESTABLECE LA ORGANIZACI N MUND1AL DEL COMERCIO ANNEX 1 ANNEXE 1 ANEXO 1 ANNEX
    [Show full text]
  • List Item Benfluorex
    ANNEX I LIST OF THE INVENTED NAMES, PHARMACEUTICAL FORMS, STRENGTH OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCTS, ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION AND MARKETING AUTHORISATION HOLDERS IN THE MEMBER STATES (EEA) 1 Member State Pharmaceutical Marketing Authorisation Holder Invented Name Strength Route of administration (EEA) Form Les Laboratoires Servier 22, rue Garnier Lipophoral CY - Cyprus 150mg tablet oral F- 92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine Tablets 150mg France Les laboratoires Servier 22 rue Garnier FR - France Mediator 150 mg tablet oral F-92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine France Mylan SAS 117 allée des Parcs FR - France Benfluorex Mylan 150 mg tablet oral 69800 Saint-Priest France Qualimed 117 allée des Parcs Benfluorex FR - France 150 mg tablet oral 69800 Saint-Priest Qualimed France Les Laboratoires Servier 22, rue Garnier LU - Luxembourg Mediator 150mg tablet oral F- 92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine France Servier Portugal - Especialidades Farmacêuticas, Lda. PT - Portugal Av. António Augusto de Aguiar Mediator 150 mg coated tablet oral 128, 1069-133 Lisboa Portugal 2 ANNEX II SCIENTIFIC CONCLUSIONS AND GROUNDS FOR THE REVOCATION OF THE MARKETING AUTHORISATIONS PRESENTED BY THE EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY 3 SCIENTIFIC CONCLUSIONS OVERALL SUMMARY OF THE SCIENTIFIC EVALUATION OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS CONTAINING BENFLUOREX (see Annex I) Benfluorex is used as an adjunct in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in overweight patients. The currently authorised therapeutic indication in France is as « Adjuvant therapy of overweight diabetics, in combination with an appropriate diet». Benfluorex has an action on carbohydrate metabolism. In animals, the following effects have been observed: - Facilitation of precipitation and use of glucose in cells (rats); - Reduction in hyperglycaemia in diabetic rats (insulin deprived or not), decrease in hyperglycaemia (measured by the glucose tolerance test area) in rabbits.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy of Benfluorex in Combination with Sulfonylurea in Type 2
    Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition ORIGINAL ARTICLE Efficacy of Benfluorex in Combination With Sulfonylurea in Type 2 Diabetic Patients An 18-week, randomized, double-blind study 1 6 PHILIPPE MOULIN, MD, PHD DRAGOMIR KOEV, MD apy is being recognized as desirable in 2 7 MARIE ANDRE, MD RAY MOORE, MRCP type 2 diabetes. According to the patho- 3 8 HASAN ALAWI, MD VIOREL SERBAN, MD 4 2 physiological mechanism of the disease, LELITA C. DOS SANTOS, MD BRIGITTE PICANDET, MD 5 2 the combination of an insulin secreta- ABDUL K. KHALID, MD MARIE FRANCILLARD, MD, PHD gogue with an insulin sensitizer is the most common drug treatment proposed for type 2 diabetic patients, in addition to OBJECTIVE — The aim of this study was to demonstrate the superiority of benfluorex over diet, lifestyle counseling, and exercise. In- placebo as an add-on therapy in type 2 diabetic patients in whom diabetes is insufficiently sulin sensitizers are not a homogenous controlled by sulfonylurea monotherapy and who have a limitation for the use of metformin. drug class. For many years, metformin was the only drug of this type on the RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS — Type 2 diabetic patients with HbA1c (A1C) (7–10%) who were receiving the maximum tolerated sulfonylurea dose and had a contraindi- market; now thiazolidinediones are an cation to or poor tolerance of metformin were randomly assigned (double blind) to receive alternative. Both metformin and thiazo- benfluorex 450 mg/day (n ϭ 165) or placebo (n ϭ 160) for 18 weeks. The main efficacy criterion lidinediones have limitations on their use: was A1C, analyzed as the change from baseline to the end of treatment using ANCOVA with gastrointestinal intolerance is common with baseline and country as covariates.
    [Show full text]
  • Impending Approval of a Dangerous Amphetamine Drug for Use in Weight Control? an Unacceptable EMA Recommendation That Must Be Overturned
    Impending approval of a dangerous amphetamine drug for use in weight control? An unacceptable EMA recommendation that must be overturned PRESS RELEASE – Paris, 19 December 2014. Today, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has announced its decision to recommend that marketing authorisation be granted for the combination naltrexone + amfebutamone (also known as bupropion) for use in weight control (MYSIMBA° in the EU/CONTRAVE° in other parts of the world), despite “uncertainties with regard to cardiovascular outcomes in the longer term” (1). A major regression for European patients’ safety. Amfebutamone is an amphetamine drug, as is amfepramone. In 2000, the EMA withdrew the marketing authorisation of several appetite suppressants with a similar mechanism of action to that of amfepramone (clobenzorex, dexfenfluramine, fenfluramine, fenproporex, etc.), in order to protect public health (2). In 2009, sibutramine (Sibutral°), an appetite suppressant structurally related to amphetamines, was also withdrawn by the EMA due to disproportionate and serious adverse drug reactions (3). And benfluorex (Mediator°) was also withdrawn from the whole European Union market in 2010 (4). In addition, in 2013, the EMA rightly refused to authorise the dangerous fixed-dose combination phentermine + topiramate on safety grounds, and the application for the drug lorcaserin (Belviq°) was withdrawn by the company following the CHMP’s “provisional opinion that Belviq could not have been approved for weight control in obese and overweight patients” (5,6). How is it possible that the CHMP now takes an incongruent decision on the fixed-dose weight-control combination naltrexone + amfebutamone (also known as bupropion) (CONTRAVE°/MYSIMBA°)? Health authorities should learn from past public health disasters.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DIX to the HTSUS—Continued
    20558 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DEPARMENT OF THE TREASURY Services, U.S. Customs Service, 1301 TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL APPEN- Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DIX TO THE HTSUSÐContinued Customs Service D.C. 20229 at (202) 927±1060. CAS No. Pharmaceutical [T.D. 95±33] Dated: April 14, 1995. 52±78±8 ..................... NORETHANDROLONE. A. W. Tennant, 52±86±8 ..................... HALOPERIDOL. Pharmaceutical Tables 1 and 3 of the Director, Office of Laboratories and Scientific 52±88±0 ..................... ATROPINE METHONITRATE. HTSUS 52±90±4 ..................... CYSTEINE. Services. 53±03±2 ..................... PREDNISONE. 53±06±5 ..................... CORTISONE. AGENCY: Customs Service, Department TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL 53±10±1 ..................... HYDROXYDIONE SODIUM SUCCI- of the Treasury. NATE. APPENDIX TO THE HTSUS 53±16±7 ..................... ESTRONE. ACTION: Listing of the products found in 53±18±9 ..................... BIETASERPINE. Table 1 and Table 3 of the CAS No. Pharmaceutical 53±19±0 ..................... MITOTANE. 53±31±6 ..................... MEDIBAZINE. Pharmaceutical Appendix to the N/A ............................. ACTAGARDIN. 53±33±8 ..................... PARAMETHASONE. Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the N/A ............................. ARDACIN. 53±34±9 ..................... FLUPREDNISOLONE. N/A ............................. BICIROMAB. 53±39±4 ..................... OXANDROLONE. United States of America in Chemical N/A ............................. CELUCLORAL. 53±43±0
    [Show full text]
  • Synthese MEDIATOR
    Inspection générale des affaires sociales RM2011-001P Enquête sur le MEDIATOR ® SYNTHESE Dr. Anne-Carole Bensadon, Etienne Marie et Dr.Aquilino Morelle Membres de l’Inspection générale des affaires sociales - Janvier 2011 - Synthèse du rapport [1] Le ministre du travail, de l’emploi et de la santé a saisi le 29 novembre 2010 l’Inspection générale des affaires sociales d’une mission d’enquête relative au Médiator. A l’issue de ses six semaines de travail, de la centaine d’auditions qu’elle a menée et de l’exploitation des dossiers scientifiques et administratifs s’échelonnant sur 40 années, la mission est en mesure de reconstituer la succession des événements et des choix qui sont allés de l’autorisation en 1974 au retrait en 2010 du médicament. Son rapport s’appuie sur près de 200 annexes pour assurer la plus grande transparence au débat public à venir. [2] Le rapport est organisé à la fois autour des principaux temps de la vie du médicament et autour de l’analyse des principales responsabilités identifiées par la mission : • les laboratoires Servier qui dès l’origine du médicament ont poursuivi un positionnement du MEDIATOR ® en décalage avec sa réalité pharmacologique (1) ; • l’Agence chargée du médicament, inexplicablement tolérante à l’égard d’un médicament sans efficacité thérapeutique réelle (2) ; • le système de pharmacovigilance, incapable d’analyser les graves risques apparus en termes de cardiotoxicité du MEDIATOR ® (3) ; • enfin, les ministres chargés de la sécurité sociale et de la santé gérant avec lenteur les déremboursements de médicaments à service médical rendu insuffisant, aboutissant dans le cas du MEDIATOR ® à des résultats inverses de ceux recherchés (4).
    [Show full text]