DOCSLIB.ORG

15585/15595 Old Columbia Pike Property Burtonsville, Maryland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
15585/15595 Old Columbia Pike Property Burtonsville, Maryland 15585/15595 OLD COLUMBIA PIKE PROPERTY BURTONSVILLE, MARYLAND April 15, 2019 15585/15595 Old Columbia Pike Property Local Area Transportation Review April 15, 2019 Prepared for: Anthony K. Cheng Prepared by: Wells + Associates, Inc. Nancy Randall, AICP, PTP Barbara Mosier, P.E., PTOE 1110 Bonifant Street, Suite 210 Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301) 448-1333 www.WellsAndAssociates.com TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION _________________________________________________ 1 OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................ 1 DESCRIPTION OF MULTI-MODAL ADEQUACY TESTS ............................................................... 1 SECTION 2: BACKGROUND DATA ____________________________________________ 6 OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................ 6 TEST REDEVELOPMENT SCENARIO .......................................................................................... 6 VEHICULAR ACCESS ................................................................................................................... 6 PUBLIC ROAD NETWORK .......................................................................................................... 6 PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................................................. 7 NON-AUTO TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES ............................................................................... 8 STUDY AREA DEFINITION .......................................................................................................... 8 EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS ....................................................................................................... 9 SECTION 3: LOCAL AREA TRANSPORTATION REVIEW _____________________ 13 OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................. 13 CONGESTION STANDARD ........................................................................................................ 13 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................ 13 BACKGROUND FUTURE CONDITIONS ..................................................................................... 16 PIPELINE DEVELOPMENTS....................................................................................................... 16 PIPELINE TRIP GENERATION ................................................................................................... 16 PIPELINE TRIP ASSIGNMENTS ................................................................................................. 16 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC FORECASTS ....................................................................................... 16 TOTAL FUTURE CONDITIONS .................................................................................................. 23 SITE TRIP GENERATION ........................................................................................................... 23 SITE TRIP ASSIGNMENTS ......................................................................................................... 23 TOTAL FUTURE FORECASTS .................................................................................................... 23 SECTION 4: PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE STATEMENT ______________________ 28 OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................. 28 TRANSIT FACILITIES ................................................................................................................. 28 PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS ......................................................................................................... 29 BICYCLE FACILITIES .................................................................................................................. 29 STREET LIGHT INVENTORY ...................................................................................................... 30 SECTION 5: SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYSIS _________________________________ 31 OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................. 31 PEAK HOUR SIGNAL WARRANT............................................................................................... 31 CRASH ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................... .33 MITIGATION ........................................................................................................................... .36 SECTION 6: CONCLUSIONS __________________________________________ 37 i LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE TITLE PAGE 1 SITE LOCATION ........................................................................................................ 4 2 EXISTING LANE USE AND TRAFFIC CONTROLS ...................................................... 11 3 EXISTING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ............................................................ 12 4 PIPELINE DEVELOPMENT LOCATIONS ................................................................... 19 5 COMBINED PIPELINE DEVELOPMENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ................ 20 6 BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ................................................... 21 7 SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS ................................................................................. 25 8 TOTAL FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES ....................................................................... 26 9 ANALYZED INCIDENT DATA POINTS LOCATION .................................................... 34 LIST OF TABLES TABLE TITLE PAGE 1 SSP SITE TRIP GENERATION .................................................................................... 5 2 AUTO-DRIVER SITE TRIP GENERATION ................................................................. 10 3 EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE ................................................................................. 15 4 PIPELINE PROJECTS TRIP GENERATION ................................................................. 18 5 BACKGROUND LEVEL OF SERVICE ......................................................................... 22 6 TOTAL FUTURE LEVEL OF SERVICE ........................................................................ 27 7 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS SUMMARY .............................................................. 32 8 CRASH DATA SUMMARY ....................................................................................... 35 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX TITLE A Scoping Correspondence B MD 198 Short Term Improvements: MD SHA District Three’s Input C Vehicular Traffic Counts D Existing Conditions Synchro 10 Results & CLVs E Traffic Forecasting Worksheets F Background Conditions Synchro 10 Results & CLVs G Total Future Conditions Synchro 10 Results & CLVs H Bus Routes Information and Schedules I Signal Warrant Tables and Reports J Crash Data: Analyzed Dataset ii 15585/15595 Old Columbia Pike April 2019 15585/15595 Old Columbia Pike Property Section 1 INTRODUCTION OVERVIEW This report presents a Local Area Transportation Review (LATR) as part of the Local Map Amendment application to rezone the property located at 15585 and 15595 Old Columbia Pike. The subject property is located on the southwest corner of the Maryland Route 198 (MD 198 – Old Columbia Pike) and U.S. 29A (Business 29) in Burtonsville, Maryland within the Burtonsville Town Center Policy Area of Montgomery County as shown on Figure 1. The 15585 and 15595 Old Columbia Pike property is currently developed with an 8,100 square foot (SF) store that sells bedding and furniture and a convenience market with eight gasoline fueling positions. The Applicant, Anthony K. Cheng, proposes to rezone the site from CRN 1.5, C-1.0, R-0.5, H-45 to the CRT Floating Zone (“CRTF”) CRTF 1.5, C-1.0, R-0.5, and H-45. As a test scenario, this study considers the replacement of the furniture store with a general retail center and an increase in the number of fueling positions. This test redevelopment scenario represents a likely worst-case scenario in terms of traffic impact for the allowable uses under the zoning change. However, it is probable that the most likely future redevelopment plan for the site would be less intense than this test scenario and include additional fueling positions, but simply repurposing the existing 8,100 SF structure to a general retail use with a new tenant instead of rebuilding and expanding the structure. Also please note that future redevelopment plans under the proposed CRT zoning would require an updated LATR study, at which time the specific development plan impact would be assessed. The test scenario is subject to Local Area Transportation Review (LATR) as it would be expected to generate 50 or more peak hour person trips. This study was prepared to satisfy LATR requirements in accordance with the draft Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (M-NCPPC) Local Area Transportation Review Guidelines, December 2017. The scope of this LATR traffic study was established in consultation with M-NCPPC and Montgomery County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) Staff. The scope of work agreement is included in Appendix A. DESCRIPTION OF MULTI-MODAL ADEQUACY TESTS Following is a description of the various multi-modal tests for determining transportation adequacy per the December 2017 LATR guidelines and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dimensions Healthcare System Request for Proposals the State Of
    Dimensions Healthcare System Request for Proposals The State of Maryland and Prince George’s County have each enacted legislative policies that encourage the participation of locally- based and minority-owned businesses. I. DEFINITIONS 1.1 “Contractor” means the Offeror selected and contracted in accordance with sections 5.5 and 5.7 of this RFP to perform the work specified in Part IV of this RFP. 1.2 “Contract Manager” means the staff representative of the Oversight Committee designated in section 4.8 of this RFP who will oversee, on behalf of the Oversight Committee, the Project and the Contractor’s activities. 1.3 “Offeror” means an entity that submits a timely proposal in response to and in accordance with the terms of this RFP. 1.4 “Oversight Committee” or “Committee” means the committee created pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding between the State of Maryland and Prince George’s County described in section 2.2 of this RFP, to support and enhance the medical services provided by the health care facilities managed by Dimensions Healthcare System. 1.5 “Project” means the services described in Part IV of this RFP. 1.6 “Project Manager” means the individual representative of the Contractor designated in its proposal, pursuant to subsection 5.1.2 of this RFP, as responsible for management of the Project and the services described in Part IV of this RFP, and who serves as the primary point of contact for the Contractor regarding all tasks related to the engagement. 1.7 “Project Coordinator” means the representative or representatives of Dimensions Healthcare System identified in section 4.8 of this RFP who are responsible for on-site, day-to-day project coordination with the Contractor.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017-2018
    EXCELLENCEANNUAL REPORT 2017–2018 IMPACT SUCCESS MESSAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2017–2018 PRESIDENT’S 2019–2021 Strategic Plan ....................................4 PATHWAYS Culinary Arts Center Opening ....................5 Prince George’s Community College now offers 10 academic Lanham Hall Opening ................................................6 pathways to degrees, certificates, Extension Centers ........................................................20 licensures, workforce trainings, and professional development. Financial Reports .......................................................... 28 Page 11 PGCC Foundation ..........................................................30 Grants ................................................................................................ 32 Donors .............................................................................................. 34 FRONT COVER Drs. Anthony T. Fulton and Thomisha M. Duru are two of the many faculty featured throughout the college in recognition of the great value and talent of our vast array of educators. MESSAGE PRESIDENT’S Prince George’s Community Their hard work and College (PGCC) had an exemplary dedication continue to receive year and set the tone for how the college honorable recognition, including receiving intends to support student success and address the highest rating on the Maryland State the region’s most pertinent needs. Thanks to the Department of Education 2018–2019 Maryland School leadership and collaborative efforts of our Board of Trustees, Report Card.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltimore Region Rail System Plan Report
    Baltimore Region Rail System Plan Report of the Advisory Committee August 2002 Advisory Committee Imagine the possibilities. In September 2001, Maryland Department of Transportation Secretary John D. Porcari appointed 23 a system of fast, convenient and elected, civic, business, transit and community leaders from throughout the Baltimore region to reliable rail lines running throughout serve on The Baltimore Region Rail System Plan Advisory Committee. He asked them to recommend the region, connecting all of life's a Regional Rail System long-term plan and to identify priority projects to begin the Plan's implemen- important activities. tation. This report summarizes the Advisory Committee's work. Imagine being able to go just about everywhere you really need to go…on the train. 21 colleges, 18 hospitals, Co-Chairs 16 museums, 13 malls, 8 theatres, 8 parks, 2 stadiums, and one fabulous Inner Harbor. You name it, you can get there. Fast. Just imagine the possibilities of Red, Mr. John A. Agro, Jr. Ms. Anne S. Perkins Green, Blue, Yellow, Purple, and Orange – six lines, 109 Senior Vice President Former Member We can get there. Together. miles, 122 stations. One great transit system. EarthTech, Inc. Maryland House of Delegates Building a system of rail lines for the Baltimore region will be a challenge; no doubt about it. But look at Members Atlanta, Boston, and just down the parkway in Washington, D.C. They did it. So can we. Mr. Mark Behm The Honorable Mr. Joseph H. Necker, Jr., P.E. Vice President for Finance & Dean L. Johnson Vice President and Director of It won't happen overnight.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1: Downtown Transit Center and Circulator Shuttle
    Howard Research and Development Corporation Downtown Columbia Downtown Transit Center and Circulator Shuttle Feasibility Study: Part 1 - Downtown Transit Center & Downtown Circulator Shuttle (Part of CEPPA #5) DRAFTDecember 2011 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. iv Chapter 1. Downtown Columbia Transit Center ....................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2. Downtown Columbia Circulator Shuttle ............................................................................................... 12 Appendix A. Regional Transit System Evaluation .............................................................................................. 21 Appendix B. Regional Transit Market Analysis .................................................................................................. 46 Appendix C. Transit Circulator Design ................................................................................................................ 64 Appendix D. Transit Center Site Evaluation ...................................................................................................... 764 Appendix E. Transit Development Plan ............................................................................................................... 79 DRAFT Page i• Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. Table of Figures Figure 1 Existing
    [Show full text]
  • Ts£^ Diane Schwartz Jones, Admtbistraior
    County Council Of Howard County, Maryland 2020 Legislative Session LegEsiative Day No. 1 Resolution No. 13-2020 Introduced by: The Chairperson at the request of the County Executive A RESOLUTION designating the area of Howard County surrounding and including the Dorsey MARC Station as a Transit-oriented Development in accordance with the Governor's Executive Order 01.01.2009.12 and State law. ^, 2020. By order fX^^S^ ^ 'tS£^_ Diane Schwartz Jones, AdmtBiStraior Read for a second time at a public hearing on *J 6V\<<k<<OA^L _, 2020. By order P^^/TdL ^ Diane Schwartz Jones, Adiy^risfrator This Resolution was read the third time and was Adopted_, Adopted with amendments',^ Failed_, Withdrawn_, by the County Council onRw^CATU^ '3 • 202°- C.rtif1ed Byyt^l^tj ^:^>^^- Diane Schwartz Jones,' Adi'nM&ftrator Approved by She County Executive ^ ^ •€ {.)^ ^rt-\ ^^J. \ . 2020 Calvifh'ffatf, County Executive NOTE: [[text in brackets]] indicates deletions from existing law, TEXT IN SMALL CAPITALS indicates additions to existing law, Strike-out indicates materiat deleted by amendment; Underlining indicates material added by Emiendment 1 WHEREAS, Title 7, Subtitle 1 of the Transportation Article of the Annotated Code of 2 Maryland requires that the Maryland Secretary of Transportation and the local government with 3 land use and planning responsibility for the relevant land area designate a Transit-Oriented 4 Development ("TOD"); and 5 6 WHEREAS, the area of Howard County surrounding and including the Maryland Area 7 Regional Commuter Dorsey Station (the
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Metropolitan Area Transit, Commission
    WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT, COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 1138 IN THE MATTER OF: Served June P, 1971 Application of WMA Transit ) Application No. 671 Company for Permanent Authority ) to Operate Route X Between ) Docket No. 226 Laurel , Maryland and Washington, ) D. C. By Application No. 671, filed on December 17, 1970, WMA Transit Company (WMA) sought to amend its WMATC Certificate- of Public Convenience and Necessity No. 8 to add authority to operate between Laurel, Maryland and Washington, D. C. WMA proposed to operate one round trip each day over the following route: From Lau rel to Farra ut S oars Commencing at Cherry Lane and U. S. Highway Route I (Laurel Shopping Center), thence via U.S. Highway Route 1, Maryland State- Route 198, Irving Street, Maryland State Route 197 (Bowie-Laurel Road), Briar- croft Lane, Briarwood Road,.Contee Road, Maryland State Route 197, cut-off to southbound Baltimore- Washington Parkway, Baltimore Washington Parkway, Kenilworth Avenue, cut-off to East Capitol Street, East Capitol Street Bridge, C Street, N.E.; North Carolina Avenue, N.E.; Constitution Avenue, N.E.; 3rd Street, N.W.; C Street, S.W.; 6th Street, S.W.; D Street, S.W.; thru S,W. Bus Terminal, D Street, S'.W.; lath Street, S.W.; Independence Avenue, S.W.; 14th Street, S.W.; H Street, N.W.; Connecticut Avenue, N.W., to Terminal Stand south of Farragut Square. From_Farragut Square to Laurel Commencing at Terminal Stand on Connecticut Avenue south of Farragut Square, thence via Eye Street, N.W.; 14th Street, N.W.; Independence Avenue, S.W.;, 12th Street; S.W.; D Street, S.W.; thru S.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Five-Year Review Report, Tipton Airfield Parcel Report Dated April 2011
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION III 1650 Arch Street . Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 September 23,2011 Markus Craig Program Manager Office of the Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management; BRAC Division NC3 - Taylor Bldg 5064A 2530 Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202 Subject: Final 5-Year Review Report for Tipton Airfield Parcel. Mr. Craig: Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject document. The five-year review process involved reviewing the protectiveness of the Tipton Airfield Parcel. The Army prepared this report to address the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) Section 12l(c) five-year review requirements. EPA has reviewed this five-year review report and found it to be consistent with EPA's June, 2001 guidance document, Comprehensive Five Year Review Guidance (OSWER No. 9355.7-03B-P, EPA 540-R-Ol-007). EPA does concur that the Tipton Airfield Parcel is protective in the short-term. However, EP A has made a determination that the long-term protectiveness of the Tipton Airfield Parcel must be deferred until the Land Use Controls are formally captured within a CERCLA decision document. EPA and the Army are currently in the process of finalizing an ESD that will address a) the need for sweeps of ordnance; b) appropriate disposal of ordnance if discovered; and c) land use control requirements. A Land Use Control Remedial Design should be submitted following the ESD which discusses the specifics of the Land Use Controls (i.e. what actions are limited and the extent of their limitation). Furthermore, as part of this five-year review, EPA has evaluated the basewide Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) measures for this site and has determined their status is as follows: Environmental Indicators 1.
    [Show full text]
  • LMA) H-134 and the Associated Floating Zone Plan
    MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION MCPB Item No.: 3A Date: 09-19-19 Cheng Property, Local Map Amendment H-134 Joshua Penn, Planner Coordinator, Area 3 Division: [email protected], 301-495-4546 Frederick V. Boyd, Master Planner/Supervisor, Area 3 Division: [email protected], 301-495-4654 Richard A. Weaver, Chief, Area 3 Division: [email protected], 301-495-4544 Staff Report Date: 09/06/19 Description ▪ Request for a reclassification from CRN 1.5, C-1.0, R-0.5, H-45 to CRTF 1.5, C-1.0, R-0.5, H 45 to allow existing retail building to accommodate uses permitted in CRTF and to redevelop existing gas station and associated convenience store. ▪ Location: 15585 and 15595 Old Columbia Road, Burtonsville ▪ Current Zone: CRN 1.5, C-1.0, R-0.5, H-45 ▪ Master Plan: 2012 Burtonsville Crossroads SummaryNeighborhood Plan ▪ Applicant: HONG CHENG, LLC & DONG YA, LLC. ▪ Filing Date: May 8, 2019 ▪ Zoning Hearing Examiner’s Public Hearing Date: September 30, 2019 Staff Recommendation: Approval of Local Map Amendment (LMA) H-134 and the associated Floating Zone Plan. Staff recommends that the following binding elements be included on the Floating Zone Plan. 1 Binding Elements: Pursuant to Section 7.2.1.A.3 of the Montgomery County Zoning Ordinance, the Applicant is proposing the following binding elements in connection with this Local Map Amendment application: 1. Limitation on Uses. The following uses, otherwise permitted in the CRT zone, are prohibited: a. Nursery (retail) b. Ambulance, rescue squad (private) c.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Master Plan Committee Document
    City of Laurel Master Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF LAUREL ____________ ____, 2016 – ORDINANCE NO. ____ February 2016 Draft 8103 SANDY SPRING ROAD LAUREL, MARYLAND CITY OF LAUREL Mayor: Craig A. Moe City Council: H. Edward Ricks, President Michael R. Leszcz, President Pro Tem Valerie M. A. Nicholas, First Ward Donna L. Crary, Second Ward Frederick Smalls, Second Ward In Conjunction With the Planning Commission Mitzi R Betman, Chairwoman John R. Kish, Vice Chairman Frederick Smalls, Ex-Officio Member Bill Wellford Donald E. Williford G. Rick Wilson And the Master Plan Review Committee Richard Armstrong Pam Brown Toni Drake Samuel Epps Roy P. Gilmore Douglas Hayes Steve Meyerer Luther Roberts G. Rick Wilson __________ ___, 2016 1 ABSTRACT Title City of Laurel Master Plan Author: Department of Community Planning and Business Services Maps: Department of Information Technology Subject: Master Plan for the City of Laurel. Elements include land use, municipal growth, community facilities, water resources, public safety, transportation, recreation, sensitive areas, and implementation. Date: __________ ____, 2016 Abstract: This document sets forth recommendations for the future development and growth of the City. Specific recommendations are made for the many elements integral to the functioning of the City including land use proposals, transportation concerns, capital improvements and the physical and living environments. The focus of the document is to provide a long- range plan for the retention of the traditional characteristics of Laurel with the integration of future land use development. 2 ORDINANCE NO. ____ AN ORDINANCE TO APPROVE AND ADOPT A MASTER PLAN FOR THE CITY OF LAUREL Sponsored by the President at the request of the Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Dorsey MARC Station Transit-Oriented Development
    Dorsey MARC Station Transit-Oriented Development Opportunity Howard County, Maryland Request for Expressions of Interest Issuance Date: April 2, 2019 Response Date: May 16, 2019 REQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST The Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT) is seeking responses to this Request for Expressions of Interest (RFEI) from experienced respondents interested in transforming surface parking lots and unimproved land into a dynamic mixed-use Transit- Oriented Development (TOD). The approximately 20.93 acre site (surface parking lot and unimproved land), owned by the MDOT Maryland Transit Administration (MDOT MTA) and MDOT State Highway Administration (MDOT SHA), is located at 7000 Deerpath Road at Maryland Route 100 (MD100), Elkridge, Maryland 21075 in the Dorsey Community. The development site is served by the Maryland Area Regional Commuter (MARC) Train Service-Camden Line extending from Camden Station in Baltimore City, Maryland to Union Station in Washington, D.C. (refer to Figure 1). The Camden Line serves approximately 4,000 daily passengers on average with approximately 530 daily boardings at the Dorsey MARC Station. The Station is approximately 15 minutes to downtown Baltimore and 30 minutes to metropolitan Washington, D.C. This project represents a significant TOD opportunity for the State of Maryland and Howard County. The Dorsey MARC Station is located adjacent to Maryland US 100 at Exit 7, also known as the Paul T. Pitcher Memorial Dorsey MARC Highway. The proposed development site will be Station accessed via Deerpath Road with access to the station for commuters via Rt. 100. The transportation network includes three (3) local bus routes with access to Dorsey MARC Station and easy access to major highways and the Baltimore Washington Thurgood Marshall International (BWI) Airport.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Laurel Master Plan
    City of Laurel Master Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF LAUREL July 25, 2016 – ORDINANCE NO. 1873 8103 SANDY SPRING ROAD LAUREL, MARYLAND CITY OF LAUREL Mayor: Craig A. Moe City Council: H. Edward Ricks, President Michael R. Leszcz, President Pro Tem Valerie M. A. Nicholas, First Ward Donna L. Crary, Second Ward Frederick Smalls, Second Ward In Conjunction With the Planning Commission Mitzi R Betman, Chairwoman John R. Kish, Vice Chairman Frederick Smalls, Ex-Officio Member Bill Wellford Donald E. Williford G. Rick Wilson And the Master Plan Review Committee Richard Armstrong Pam Brown Toni Drake Samuel Epps Roy P. Gilmore Douglas Hayes Steve Meyerer Luther Roberts G. Rick Wilson July 25, 2016 1 ABSTRACT Title City of Laurel Master Plan Author: Department of Economic and Community Development Maps: Department of Information Technology Subject: Master Plan for the City of Laurel. Elements include land use, municipal growth, community facilities, water resources, public safety, transportation, recreation, sensitive areas, and implementation. Date: July 25, 2016 Abstract: This document sets forth recommendations for the future development and growth of the City. Specific recommendations are made for the many elements integral to the functioning of the City including land use proposals, transportation concerns, capital improvements and the physical and living environments. The focus of the document is to provide a long- range plan for the retention of the traditional characteristics of Laurel with the integration of future land use development. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 1873 AN ORDINANCE TO APPROVE AND ADOPT A MASTER PLAN FOR THE CITY OF LAUREL Sponsored by the President at the request of the Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltimore Report.P65
    EFFECTS OF CATASTROPHIC EVENTS ON TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS Baltimore, MD—Howard Street Tunnel Fire—July 18, 2001 July 2002 U.S. Department of Transportation ITS Joint Program Office Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. ii Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Effects of Catastrophic Events on Transportation System Management July 2002 and Operations, Howard Street Tunnel Fire, Baltimore City, Maryland – July 18, 2001 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Mark R. Carter, Mark P. Howard, Nicholas Owens, David Register, Jason Kennedy, Kelley Pecheux, Aaron Newton 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Science Applications International Corporation 7980 Science Applications Court 11. Contract or Grant No. Vienna, VA 22183 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered U.S. Department of Transportation Catastrophic Events Case Study Federal Highway Administration ITS Joint Program Office 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 400 Seventh Street, SW Washington, DC 20590 15. Supplementary Notes Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (COTR) – Joseph Peters 16. Abstract This report documents the actions taken by transportation agencies in response to the earthquake in Northridge, California on January 17, 1994, and is part of a larger effort to examine the impacts of catastrophic events on transportation system facilities and services. The findings documented in this report are a result of a detailed literature search on Northridge lessons learned.
    [Show full text]