REGULAR MEETING OF COUNCIL
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 12, 2017, AT 6:30 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 1027 ALDOUS STREET, SMITHERS, B.C.
A G E N D A
1. CALL TO ORDER
1.1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Town of Smithers acknowledges the Gidimt'en Clan and the Witsuwit'en people, on whose unceded traditional territory we live, work and play.
1.2 APPROVAL OF AGENDA (including Supplemental Items)
1.3 PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD (one minute per speaker regarding agenda items only).
2. PUBLIC HEARING
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
3.1 REGULAR - NOV 28 Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council held November 28, 2017.
4. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES
4.1 OUTSTANDING COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE TOPICS • Fairgrounds Management Agreement between the Town and the BVAIA • Revitalization Taxation Exemption Program - February 20, 2018 (tentative) • Ranger Park Building Upgrade • Economic Development Strategy.
Page 1 of 239 Agenda of the Regular Meeting of Council being held December 12, 2017.
4.2 ITEM 7.1.1 - REGULAR - NOV 28 - LIBRARY/ART GALLERY FACILITY The following motion was postponed at the November 28, 2017, Regular Meeting of Council:
R.17.509 Wray/Browne THAT Council directs Staff to prepare a report regarding possible reductions in parking requirements in public zones, prior to issuing the Request for Proposals for the proposed Library and Art Gallery Facility, for Council's consideration.
5. PETITIONS AND DELEGATIONS
5.1 ACCESS SMITHERS UPDATE Presentation by G. Snowdymond providing an update on Access Smithers' projects.
6. COUNCIL REPORTS
6.1 COUNCILLOR ATRILL
6.1.1 ACCESS SMITHERS - OCT 10 Minutes of the Access Smithers meeting held October 10, 2017.
6.2 COUNCILLOR BRIENESSE
6.2.1 AIRPORT MODERNIZATION - 30% PROGRESS UPDATE - DEC 7 Smithers Regional Airport Modernization Project Committee's 30% Progress Update dated December 7, 2017 (8400-03).
6.3 COUNCILLOR BROWN
6.4 COUNCILLOR BROWNE
6.5 COUNCILLOR GOODACRE
6.5.1 VISITOR STATS Visitor Statistics from the Smithers District Chamber of Commerce for the period ending November 30, 2017 (0230- 20).
Page 2 of 239 Agenda of the Regular Meeting of Council being held December 12, 2017.
6.6 COUNCILLOR WRAY
6.7 REPORT OF MAYOR BACHRACH
6.7.1 MAYOR'S REPORT - DEC 12 Mayor's Report dated December 12, 2017 (0550-01).
6.8 REPORT OF RDBN AREA A DIRECTOR
7. STAFF REPORTS
7.1 STAFF (A) REPORTS
7.1.1 SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Report DEV 17-043 dated October 31, 2017, from Y. Hernandez, Planner, recommending Council support: a) text amendments to Sign Bylaw No. 1789; and b) enforcement strategy for Temporary Signs along Highway 16 (3030-20). Note: This item was postponed at the November 28, 2017, Regular Meeting of Council.
7.1.2 DEPUTY MAYOR 2018 Report ADM 17-063 dated December 4, 2017, from D. Plouffe, Director of Corporate Services, recommending Council designate a member of Council to be Deputy Mayor for 2018 (0550-01).
7.1.3 BC RURAL DIVIDEND FUND - ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION & TRAIL UPGRADE Report ADM 17-061 dated December 5, 2017, from J. Bagnall, NDIT Intern, recommending applying to the BC Rural Dividend Program for an Active Transportation Plan and Trail Upgrade Project (1855-20).
7.1.4 DRAFT REVITALIZATION TAXATION EXEMPTION PROGRAM Report FIN 17-052 dated November 29, 2017, from L. Ford, Director of Finance, recommending approval of the draft "Revitalization Taxation Exemption Program" so that it can be presented to key stakeholders during the consultation process (1610-01).
Page 3 of 239 Agenda of the Regular Meeting of Council being held December 12, 2017.
7.1.5 LIBRARY BOARD APPOINTMENT Report FIN 17-53 dated November 30, 2017, from L. Ford, Director of Finance, recommending re-appointment of John Buikema to the Smithers Public Library Board for a 2-year term (1610-01).
7.1.6 2018 BUDGET MEETING SCHEDULE Report FIN 17-54 dated December 5, 2017, from L. Ford, Director of Finance, recommending approval of the revised 2018 Budget meeting schedule (1610-01).
7.2 STAFF (B) REPORTS
7.2.1 CITIZEN BUDGET RESULTS Report FIN 17-51 dated November 28, 2017, from L. Ford, Director of Finance, providing the results of the Citizen Budget Tax Module (1610-01).
8. BYLAWS
8.1 BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Report DEV 17-072 introducing "Bylaw No. 1822 - Town of Smithers Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 1614 Amendment No. 17-02" and "Bylaw No. 1823 - Town of Smithers Zoning Bylaw No. 1403 Amendment No. 17-03" for readings and recommending Bylaws 1822 and 1823 proceed to Public Hearing (Supportive Housing).
a) "Bylaw No. 1822 - Town of Smithers Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 1614 Amendment No. 17-02" (Supportive Housing)
First and second readings.
b) "Bylaw No. 1823 - Town of Smithers Zoning Bylaw No. 1403 Amendment No. 17-03"
First and second readings.
9. CORRESPONDENCE (A) ITEMS
9.1 NWCC - STUDENT RESIDENCE Letter dated December 5, 2017, from Denis Caron, Director of Facilities and Ancillary Services, Northwest Community College, requesting approval in principle for the use of the LB Warner site for a potential temporary Northwest Community College student residence project, for the period of three to four years (0400-0).
Page 4 of 239 Agenda of the Regular Meeting of Council being held December 12, 2017.
9.2 BOARDING FOR BRANT - RESOLUTION REQUEST Letter dated November 22, 2017, from J. Krauskopf, Boarding for Brant (and letter from the Town dated July 31, 2017), requesting a specific resolution of support to accompany their grant application for Regional District of Bulkley Nechako's Gas Tax funds to renovate and expand the Smithers Skatepark (0530-05).
9.3 SICAMOUS - QUAGGA AND ZEBRA MUSSEL PREVENTION Email dated November 30, 2017, from the District of Sicamous seeking support for its initiative to prevent quagga and zebra mussels (template letter to the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy is included). (0400-40)
10. CORRESPONDENCE (B) ITEMS - RECEIVE FOR INFORMATION
10.1 BILLBOARDS ALONG HIGHWAY Email dated November 28, 2017, from B. McGonigal regarding the proliferation of billboards on private property adjacent to the Highway 16 right-of-way creating a traffic hazard to motorists (0400-20).
10.2 QUICK STATION RESIDENTS - RAIL CONCERNS Letter dated October 20, 2017, from D. Gillespie, Quick Station Residents' Association, presenting two letters to the Minister of Transport outlining the Association's concerns over rail transport (0400- 40).
10.3 STATISTICS CANADA - 2016 CENSUS DATA Email dated November 29, 2017, from Statistics Canada regarding new 2016 census data being available online (0400-40).
10.4 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Email dated December 1, 2017, from Fisheries and Oceans Canada seeking feedback on the Draft Wild Salmon Policy Implementation Plan (deadline December 15, 2017) (0400-40).
10.5 BVEDA - ROWELL RESIGNATION Letter dated November 28, 2017, from S. Rowell resigning as Chair and Director of the Bulkley Valley Economic Development Association effective January 1, 2018, to coincide with the completion of the BVEDA's contractual obligations to its funders (6750-20).
Page 5 of 239 Agenda of the Regular Meeting of Council being held December 12, 2017.
11. CORRESPONDENCE (D) ITEMS
12. SUPPLEMENTAL ITEMS APPROVED FOR DISCUSSION
13. OTHER/NEW BUSINESS
14. PUBLIC QUESTION PERIOD
15. ADJOURNMENT
Page 6 of 239 Agenda Item # 3.1
TOWN OF SMITHERS
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF COUNCIL HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 1027 ALDOUS STREET, SMITHERS B.C. ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2017, AT 6:30 P.M.
Council Present: Staff Present: Taylor Bachrach, Mayor Dianna Plouffe, Acting Chief Administrative Officer and Gladys Atrill, Councillor Director of Corporate Services Phil Brienesse, Councillor Leslie Ford, Director of Finance Greg Brown, Councillor Mark Allen, Director of Development Services Shelley Browne, Councillor Keith Stecko, Fire Chief Bill Goodacre, Councillor Roger Smith , Director of Works and Operations Frank Wray, Councillor. Yazmin Hernandez, Planner Janice McKay, Recording Secretary.
Staff Excused: Anne Yanciw, Chief Administrative Officer Rob Blackburn, Airport Manager.
Media Present: H. Skrinjar, Moose FM, and C. Gareau, The Interior News.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Bachrach called the meeting to order (6:30 p.m.).
1.1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Mayor Bachrach read aloud the following: "The Town of Smithers acknowledges the Gidimt'en Clan and the Witsuwit'en people, on whose unceded traditional territory we live, work and play".
1.2 APPROVAL OF AGENDA (including Supplemental Items) R17.496 Browne/Wray THAT Council approves the agenda. CARRIED.
1.3 PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD (one minute per speaker regarding agenda items only). None.
Page 1 of 14
REGULAR - NOV 28 Page 7 of 239 Agenda Item # 3.1
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council held on Tuesday, November 28, 2017, at 6:30 p.m.
2. PUBLIC HEARING
2.1 PUBLIC OPPORTUNITY - BYLAW 1815 (MANTON ROAD) Mayor Bachrach opened the Public Opportunity to Speak for "Bylaw No. 1815 - Road Closure and Highway Dedication Removal of Manton Road Spur" at 6:32 p.m.
The purpose of Bylaw 1815 is to permanently close the Manton Road Spur right-of-way.
Written approval from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure dated November 21, 2017, was included in the agenda package. No further submissions were received.
Mayor Bachrach opened the floor to the gallery.
Bob Mitchell, 4073 Ninth Avenue: Mr. Mitchell, local resident and hiker, is concerned that access to Crown Land is continually being taken away. He named Rosenthal Road, 19th Avenue, Powell Street, Anderson Road, the area behind CN, the water tower site on Hudson Bay Mountain, the Cycle 16 route, Tyee Lake, and the Bulkley River, as areas where public access has been denied over time. When he was employed by the Ministry of Forests, rights-of-way were created automatically. In this particular case, because the Town has no pedestrian or bike plan in place, we do not know if that piece of right-of- way will be used in the future. Without that vision for the future, he will continue to voice his opposition to inaccessible Crown Land.
Mayor Bachrach advised that Anderson Road is the safer public access to the property.
The Public Opportunity closed at 6:37 p.m.
2.2 PUBLIC HEARING FOR BYLAWS 1820 & 1821 Mayor Bachrach opened the Public Hearing for "Bylaw No. 1820 - Town of Smithers Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 1614 Amendment No. 17-01" and "Bylaw No. 1821 - Town of Smithers Zoning Bylaw No. 1403 Amendment No. 17-02" (1736 Princess Street) at 6:38 p.m.
Bylaw No. 1820 is an Official Community Plan amendment for 1736 Princess Street to change the land use designation from Single Family Residential to Mixed Residential. Bylaw No. 1821 is a Zoning Bylaw amendment for 1736 Princess Street to rezone from Single Family Residential (R-1) to Low Density Residential (R-2).
Page 2 of 14
REGULAR - NOV 28 Page 8 of 239 Agenda Item # 3.1
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council held on Tuesday, November 28, 2017, at 6:30 p.m.
Mayor Bachrach noted that the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure approval dated November 21, 2017, was included in the agenda package. No further submissions were received.
Mayor Bachrach opened the floor to members of the gallery.
Mayor Bachrach called a first time for submissions. Mayor Bachrach called a second time for submissions. Mayor Bachrach called a third time for submissions, and, hearing none, closed the Public Hearing for Bylaw 1820 and Bylaw 1821 at 6:40 p.m.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
3.1 REGULAR - NOV 14 R17.497 Atrill/Wray THAT the minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council held November 14, 2017, be adopted. CARRIED.
3.2 SPECIAL OPEN - NOV 10 R17.498 Wray/Brown THAT the minutes of the Special Open Meeting of Council held November 10, 2017, be adopted (Rosenthal Road). CARRIED.
3.3 C.O.W. - NOV 7 R17.499 Wray/Browne THAT the minutes of the Committee of the Whole meeting held November 7, 2017, be adopted (Revitalization Taxation Exemption Program). CARRIED.
3.4 C.O.W. - OCT 30 R17.500 Wray/Browne THAT the minutes of the Committee of the Whole meeting held October 30, 2017, be adopted (Economic Development Models). CARRIED.
Page 3 of 14
REGULAR - NOV 28 Page 9 of 239 Agenda Item # 3.1
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council held on Tuesday, November 28, 2017, at 6:30 p.m.
4. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES
4.1 OUTSTANDING COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE TOPICS The list of outstanding Committee of the Whole topics was reviewed.
5.1 VARY AGENDA R17.501 Wray/Brienesse THAT Council vary the agenda by bringing to this point in the meeting Item 5.1 - Delegation from the Wetzin'kwa Community Forest Corporation. CARRIED.
PETITIONS AND DELEGATIONS Jay Baker, Gary Hanson, and Michael Mehr presented the Wetzin'kwa Community Forest Corporation (WCFC) 2016-2017 Annual Report.
Jay Baker, General Manager, Silvicon Services Inc., is WCFC's main contractor and looks after management of the licence. Gary Hanson is one of seven Board Directors and he represents the Town of Smithers. Michael Mehr, Edmison Mehr Chartered Professional Accountants, was present to introduce the financial statements section of the Annual Report.
The presentation included the following: • WCFC is a for-profit corporation • there are two Co-chairs and three rotating community-at-large Board Directors • core values - cultural, ecological, economic, and recreational • the forest tenure was awarded ten years ago - since then 650,000 cubic metres of timber has been sold to local processing facilities, with $18 million in contracted work • during the 2016-2017 fiscal year approximately 51,000 cubic metres was harvested and delivered to Pacific Inland Resources and Seaton Forest Products • WCFC has facilitated the delivery of several loads of firewood to the community of Witset • current cut control is approximately 151,000 cubic metres over a five-year period (there are approximately 110,000 cubic metres remaining to be harvested over the next four years) • harvesting operations are on a decline as we come out of the pine beetle impasse • during the course of the year WCFC constructed one bridge and 0.2 km. of winter road • a steaming unit was purchased to alleviate ice build up in culverts, ditches and underneath bridges, averting damage to road sub-grade and bridge infrastructure
Page 4 of 14
REGULAR - NOV 28 Page 10 of 239 Agenda Item # 3.1
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council held on Tuesday, November 28, 2017, at 6:30 p.m.
• harvesting and road building operations completed in 2016-2017 fiscal year resulted in contracts with a combined value in excess of $1.5 million. • the corporation has a longstanding commitment to safety and a good safety record, due in part to hiring SAFE Certified companies • there is a potential threat of spruce beetle - detailed aerial surveys and detection work are being done to stay on top of it • there has been less open burning annually, due to a debris abatement strategy whereby materials failing to meet sawlog specifications are put at roadside and made available for members of the community • there is a good relationship with affected stakeholders - recreation is the heart and soul of the community forest • there is a harvest demonstration trail where the public can learn about the workings of the community forest - extensive trail maintenance was completed in the spring • "Tree Talkers" tours were hosted by the WCFC for the July Girl Guides' Spirit of Adventure Rendezvous event • a major milestone for the WCFC is that 55 hectares have met the criteria for the declaration of "Free Growing" - this means that these young stands are well on their way to being the next forest • in 2017 WCFC planted 63% spruce, 31% pine and some larch was planted - larch is being planted to increase the diversity of species and because of climate-change guidelines • the Community Grant Program was established to distribute profits back into the community and supports a broad range of projects • grant applications, up to a maximum of $10,000 are received up to May 31st • $150,000 to $200,000 per year is awarded to non-profit applicants between Hungry Hill and Witset • last year they received 60 applications with a total ask of $350,000 - approximately $200,000 was granted • in 2016-2017 the WCFC was able to provide each of the three key stakeholders a contribution of $30,000 • the WCFC has established a Legacy Fund to ensure the Community Grant Program is sustainable even in years where limited or no harvesting has occurred • Financial details: $7.5 million in assets, $1 million is kept in cash for working capital, approximately $6 million in investments (many at the BV Credit Union), about $2.4 million in term deposits, about $4 million in other marketable securities, $5.9 million in equity, $1.4 million set aside for future silviculture costs, $0.5 million in gross profit and some investment income
Page 5 of 14
REGULAR - NOV 28 Page 11 of 239 Agenda Item # 3.1
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council held on Tuesday, November 28, 2017, at 6:30 p.m.
• the WCFC has several reserve funds, including Operating Reserve, Road and Bridge Construction Reserve, Stewardship Reserve, and a Legacy Reserve of $3 million.
In response to questions and comments from Council, the presenters advised that: a) the WCFC has been putting material along the roadside which they feel is suitable for firewood (including balsam) and directing people to it; b) 65% to 70% of pine was harvested last year - the remaining pine should be gone within this 5 year cut control period; c) the WCFC is planning to incorporate a community wildfire protection planning strategy; d) larch is not commercially viable today - it is very good wood; e) regarding spruce beetle, aerial surveys detected 11 sites (17 trees). Last year the probing work that was done found a handful of spruce beetle trees. There are a number of treatments that can be used to slow down spread in its initial stages; f) the WCFC takes a conservative approach to its engineering designs, by taking a rounded- up approach, as opposed to overbuilding; and g) there are many different types of governance models among the 80 community forests in the province and ours is a really good model.
4.2 C.O.W. - NOV 7 - MOTION The motion arising from the November 7, 2017, Committee of the Whole meeting (Revitalization Taxation Exemption Program), was presented.
R17.502 Brienesse/Browne THAT Council revises the motion from the Committee of the Whole Meeting held November 7, 2017, from the following:
"THAT Council answers the 'WHAT' tax revitalization exemption decision question with the following: "A program focusing on secondary residential within downtown, with downtown defined as King Street to Queen Street and Highway 16 to Railway Avenue", to the following:
"THAT Council directs Staff to create a Revitalization Taxation Exemption program focusing on secondary residential within downtown, with downtown defined as King Street to Queen Street and Highway 16 to Railway Avenue". OPPOSED: COUNCILLOR WRAY. CARRIED.
R17.503 Brienesse/Brown THAT Council use the remainder of the recommendations contained in Staff Report FIN 17-048 as the foundation for the Town's Revitalization Taxation Exemption program. CARRIED.
Page 6 of 14
REGULAR - NOV 28 Page 12 of 239 Agenda Item # 3.1
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council held on Tuesday, November 28, 2017, at 6:30 p.m.
4.3 3866 RAILWAY AVE L Ford advised that last year's cost for hydro for the Town-owned building located at 3866 Railway Avenue was $2,700.
R17.504 Brienesse/Brown THAT Council directs Staff to proceed with the Art Gallery's proposal, for a one dollar per year Lease Agreement, for the Town-owned building at 3866 Railway Avenue, for a three-year term. CARRIED.
5. PETITIONS AND DELEGATIONS
See Item 4.1.
6. COUNCIL REPORTS
6.1 COUNCILLOR ATRILL
6.1.1 ATRILL REPORT Councillor Atrill reported that she attended: a) two Access Smithers meetings (she will prepare a report, with a number of questions, for A. Yanciw and M. Allen, regarding the Willowvale Marsh project); b) the Wetzin'kwa Community Forest Corporation Annual General Meeting held at The Creamery in Telkwa; and c) the Fall Fair Management Committee meeting held November 27, 2017.
6.2 COUNCILLOR BRIENESSE
6.2.1 BRIENESSE REPORT Councillor Brienesse commented on the well-attended Christmas in the Valley event and suggested that Main Street be closed off to vehicle traffic in future years for safety reasons.
6.3 COUNCILLOR BROWN
6.3.1 BROWN REPORT Councillor Brown reported that the Bulkley Valley Lakes District Airshed Management Society received the $20,000 committed by the Ministry of Environment.
He recognized the good work and leadership of the Local Action Team, funded by the Child and Youth Mental Health and Substance Use Collaborative, noting that there is a Union of British Columbia Municipalities' resolution calling for an extension of the Collaborative, as funding runs out at the end of this year.
Page 7 of 14
REGULAR - NOV 28 Page 13 of 239 Agenda Item # 3.1
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council held on Tuesday, November 28, 2017, at 6:30 p.m.
Councillor Brown attended the Federation of Canadian Municipalities' Advocacy Days where it was announced that federal dollars will be available for housing and he offered to share further information with Council.
6.4 COUNCILLOR BROWNE
6.4.1 BROWNE REPORT Councillor Browne advised that: a) she attended the film, "The Secret Path" at the Smithers Library which was well attended and followed by a good, facilitated discussion; b) she participated in the Christmas in the Valley event; and c) she is trying to organize a New Year's Day polar bear dip.
Councillor Browne acknowledged R. Smith and the Works and Operations employees for their snow-clearing efforts.
6.5 COUNCILLOR GOODACRE
6.5.1 GOODACRE REPORT Councillor Goodacre reported that the Hazelton Local Action Team is putting on a four-day reconciliation workshop in Hazelton this week which he is attending. A similar workshop will be held in Witset for the Wit'suwit'en people and one was held in Hazelton for the Gitxsan. The idea is to get all three groups together at a later date.
6.6 COUNCILLOR WRAY
6.6.1 LIBRARIAN'S REPORT - OCT The Librarian's Report for October 2017, from W. Wright, Library Director, and library usage statistics, were presented (7960-02).
6.7 REPORT OF MAYOR BACHRACH
6.7.1 MAYOR'S REPORT - NOV 28 Mayor Bachrach presented his written Mayor's Report dated November 28, 2017 (0550-01).
6.7.2 NOTICE OF MOTION - SUBDIVISION SERVICING & DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS BYLAW The Notice of Motion presented by Mayor Bachrach at the Regular Meeting of Council held November 14, 2017, was put forward for discussion.
Page 8 of 14
REGULAR - NOV 28 Page 14 of 239 Agenda Item # 3.1
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council held on Tuesday, November 28, 2017, at 6:30 p.m.
6.7.2 cont’d Bachrach/Browne R17.505 THAT Council directs Staff to amend the Subdivision Servicing and Development Standards Bylaw to include a cash-in-lieu clause that allows property owners, in situations where constructing short sections of sidewalk is deemed impractical, to pay the Town funds equivalent to the Town's estimated cost of constructing the sidewalk at a future date, and that a statutory reserve and tracking process be established for this purpose. CARRIED.
6.8 REPORT OF RDBN AREA A DIRECTOR
6.8.1 RDBN AREA 'A' UPDATE Director M. Fisher, Regional District of Bulkley-Nechako, presented his written Area 'A' update and answered questions from Council (0400-55).
RECESS Mayor Bachrach called for a brief recess (9:03 p.m.).
The meeting reconvened (9:11 p.m.).
7. STAFF REPORTS
7.1 STAFF (A) REPORTS
7.1.1 LIBRARY & ART GALLERY FACILITY - NEXT STEPS Report DEV 17-068 dated October 30, 2017, from Y. Hernandez, Planner, recommending: a) issuing an RFP for development of a concept design and business case for the proposed Library and Art Gallery facility; and b) establishing a new budget ceiling, was presented (6240-20, 7710-01).
R17.506 Brienesse/Browne THAT Council sets the parameters, in the Request for Proposals for the proposed Library and Art Gallery facility, as follows: a) a maximum of 11,000 square feet; and b) a maximum building cost, including off-site works and landscaping, of $6.4 million. OPPOSED: COUNCILLORS ATRILL, DEFEATED. BROWN, BROWNE, AND GOODACRE.
R17.507 Bachrach/Goodacre THAT Council provides to the Request for Proposals, the parameter of 12,000 square feet for the total building area for the proposed Library and Art Gallery facility. OPPOSED: COUNCILLORS BRIENESSE AND CARRIED. BROWNE.
Page 9 of 14
REGULAR - NOV 28 Page 15 of 239 Agenda Item # 3.1
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council held on Tuesday, November 28, 2017, at 6:30 p.m.
7.1.1 cont’d Brown/Wray R17.508 THAT Council approves Staff issuing a Request for Proposals for the proposed Library and Art Gallery facility for the development of: a) program clarification; b) concept design; and c) business case. OPPOSED: COUNCILLOR BRIENESSE. CARRIED.
R17.509 Wray/Browne THAT Council directs Staff to prepare a report regarding possible reductions in parking requirements in public zones, prior to issuing the Request for Proposals for the proposed Library and Art Gallery facility, for Council's consideration. NO VOTE.
R17.510 Brienesse/Browne THAT Motion R17.509 be postponed to the Regular Meeting of Council to be held December 12, 2017. CARRIED.
7.1.2 AUXILIARY BUILDING FOLLOW UP Report DEV 17-074 dated November 17, 2017, from Y. Hernandez, Planner, recommending Council support enforcement of the prohibition of auxiliary buildings in the C-1 and C-1A zones, be presented (3750- 20).
10.3 VARY AGENDA R17.511 Browne/Wray THAT Council varies the agenda to bring to this point in the meeting Item 10.3 - Letter dated November 20, 2017, from K. and B. Graham regarding their auxiliary building at 3839 Second Avenue and letter dated October 16, 2017, from Y. Hernandez, Planner. CARRIED.
R17.512 Browne/ THAT Council postpones the matter of auxiliary buildings in the C1 and C1-A zones. MOTION LOST DUE TO LACK OF SECONDER. R17.513 Brown/Wray THAT Council supports enforcement of the prohibition of auxiliary buildings in the C-1 and C-1A zones. OPPOSED: COUNCILLOR BRIENESSE CARRIED. AND MAYOR BACHRACH.
Page 10 of 14
REGULAR - NOV 28 Page 16 of 239 Agenda Item # 3.1
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council held on Tuesday, November 28, 2017, at 6:30 p.m.
7.1.2 cont’d Browne/ R17.514 THAT Staff prepare a report for options around auxiliary buildings in the C1 and C1-A zones going forward. MOTION LOST DUE TO LACK OF SECONDER.
Mayor Bachrach advised that Council can expect to receive from Staff "suggested changes to the bylaw that permit safe, aesthetically- pleasing auxiliary buildings in the C1-A zone", as stated in Motion R17.474 of the minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council held November 14, 2017.
7.1.3 SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS R17.515 Brienesse/Atrill THAT Council postpones, to the Regular Meeting of Council to be held December 12, 2017, discussion of Item 7.1.3. - Report DEV 17-043 dated October 31, 2017, from Y. Hernandez, Planner, recommending Council support: a) text amendments to Sign Bylaw No. 1789; and b) enforcement strategy for Temporary Signs along Highway 16. CARRIED.
7.2 STAFF (B) REPORTS
7.2.1 MASS NOTIFICATION SYSTEM Report FIR 17-003 dated November 21, 2017, from K. Stecko, Fire Chief, regarding the Everbridge Mass Notification System, was presented.
7.2.2 MUNICIPAL MARKERS - OCT Municipal Markers dated October 2017, was presented.
8. BYLAWS
8.1 BYLAW 1815 R17.516 Brienesse/Browne THAT "Bylaw No. 1815 - Road Closure and Highway Dedication Removal of Manton Road Spur", be adopted. CARRIED.
8.2 BYLAW 1819 R17.517 Browne/Wray THAT "Bylaw No. 1819 - Five-Year (2017-2021) Financial Plan Bylaw No. 1809, Amendment No. 2", be adopted. CARRIED.
Page 11 of 14
REGULAR - NOV 28 Page 17 of 239 Agenda Item # 3.1
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council held on Tuesday, November 28, 2017, at 6:30 p.m.
8.3 BYLAW 1820 R17.518 Atrill/Brienesse THAT "Bylaw No. 1820 - Town of Smithers Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 1614 Amendment No. 17-01", be read a third time (1736 Princess Street). CARRIED.
R17.519 Brienesse/Wray THAT "Bylaw No. 1820 - Town of Smithers Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 1614 Amendment No. 17-01", be adopted. CARRIED.
8.4 BYLAW 1821 R17.520 Wray/Brienesse THAT "Bylaw No. 1821 - Town of Smithers Zoning Bylaw No. 1403 Amendment No. 17-02", be read a third time (1736 Princess Street). CARRIED.
R17.521 Wray/Browne THAT "Bylaw No. 1821 - Town of Smithers Zoning Bylaw No. 1403 Amendment No. 17-02", be adopted. CARRIED.
9. CORRESPONDENCE (A) ITEMS
9.1 LIONS CLUB - ARENA FEE Letter dated November 20, 2017, from the Smithers Lions Club requesting that the Town waive the ice arena rental fee of $98 for the Skate with Santa event being held December 15, 2017, was presented (0530-05).
R17.522 Atrill/Browne THAT Council waives the arena ice rental fee of $98 for the Smithers Lions Club's Skate with Santa event being held December 15, 2017. OPPOSED: COUNCILLORS BRIENESSE, DEFEATED. BROWN, BROWNE, WRAY AND MAYOR BACHRACH.
R17.523 Atrill/Wray THAT Council contributes a $98 grant, from Council Contingency, to the Smithers Lions Club to cover the ice rental fee for the Skate with Santa event being held December 15, 2017. OPPOSED: COUNCILLOR BRIENESSE. CARRIED.
Page 12 of 14
REGULAR - NOV 28 Page 18 of 239 Agenda Item # 3.1
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council held on Tuesday, November 28, 2017, at 6:30 p.m.
10. CORRESPONDENCE (B) ITEMS - RECEIVE FOR INFORMATION
10.1 CFIB - MUNICIPAL SPENDING & PUBLIC SECTOR WAGES The email dated November 6, 2017, from the Canadian Federation of Independent Business regarding municipal spending and public sector wage growth, was presented (2700-01).
10.2 OMBUDSPERSON ANNUAL REPORT The email dated November 7, 2017, from the Office of the Ombudsperson introducing the 2016-2017 Annual Report, was presented (Annual Report in 'D' Items) (0400-20).
10.3 GRAHAM - AUXILIARY BLDG See Staff Reports 7.1.2.
10.4 BULKLEY-NECHAKO TRANSIT UPDATE The email dated November 20, 2017, from the Regional Transit Coordinator, Regional District of Bulkley-Nechako, providing a transit update and ridership table, was presented (8500-01).
10.5 AMBULANCE PARAMEDICS The email and letter dated November 21, 2017, from the Ambulance Paramedics of British Columbia (CUPE 873), as a follow up to the 2017 Union of British Columbia Municipalities convention, were presented (0230-30).
11. CORRESPONDENCE (D) ITEMS
11.1 2016-2017 Annual Report, Office of the Ombudsperson, was presented.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL ITEMS APPROVED FOR DISCUSSION
13. OTHER/NEW BUSINESS
13.1 CHRISTMAS TREE R. Smith advised that the Christmas tree was not up for Christmas in the Valley, as snow-clearing operations took precedence, but one will be put up before Christmas if time and weather permit.
13.2 COMMENT FROM RESIDENT Mayor Bachrach reported that a member of the public advised that he was having difficulty with the Request for Service using his mobile device, so he phoned in his request (regarding snow removal) and received a friendly, prompt response.
Page 13 of 14
REGULAR - NOV 28 Page 19 of 239 Agenda Item # 3.1
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council held on Tuesday, November 28, 2017, at 6:30 p.m.
13.3 TRANSIT COMMITTEE MEETING L. Ford reminded Council of the Smithers and District Transit Committee meeting being held at noon on December 1, 2017.
13.4 COUNCIL ABSENCE Councillor Atrill advised that some time ago she circulated, to Council and Administration, the dates she is planning to be away, with the intention that, should other Councillors be unable to attend the same budget meeting(s), perhaps Council might be willing to consider other budget meeting dates.
14. PUBLIC QUESTION PERIOD
None.
15. ADJOURNMENT
R17.524 Atrill/Browne THAT the Regular Meeting of Council be adjourned (11:30 p.m.). CARRIED.
Taylor Bachrach Dianna Plouffe Mayor Acting Chief Administrative Officer
Certified a True and Correct Copy of the minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council held Tuesday, November 28, 2017, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 1027 Aldous Street, Smithers, B.C.
Dianna Plouffe Corporate Officer
Page 14 of 14
REGULAR - NOV 28 Page 20 of 239 Agenda Item # 5.1
,/,
Sffifithe RECEffVE
DELEGATION TO COUNCIL ocÏ t 6 2017
Your completed delegation form, and any other written documentation wisb to provide. is required by Tuesday, the week prior to the Council Meeting to ensure that it is n r,trßütlnßú fimillrsrs agenda packages. This allows Council time to review the subject matter p " r presentation and allows you to focus on the highlights. Please deliver in person or fax to 250-847^ 1 601.
Regular Council Meetings are held the second and fourth Tuesday of the month in the Council Chambers at 1027 Aldous Street. Meetings start at 6:30 p.m. and doors open at 6:15 p.m. Delegations take place near the start of the meetings.
Maximum presentation time is 5 minutes followed by an opportunity for a question and answer period lead by Council. lf you are making a PowerPoint presentation (Windows Environment), please drop it off on a memory stick prior to 4:00 p.m. on the day of your presentation. A hardcopy, for the recording secretary's use, is appreciated.
Name of presenter(s):
Organization:
Phone No: Email subject matter: îþn,,< lr G c a ce 4c t , io f,T-/le r( kcessi 6/ Lr LlJù¿g t'{¡ fsftfa c, F¡ Å""*, Jní¿frlæs ptcsz ats ry
Specific request of Council (if any), i.e. letter of support, donations, ete. (lt is Councíl's pmctice to defer any decrsr'ons untilthe following Council meeting.)
hY',/t I,t kL {a efaÊ,7
Date of Application: C;e /l Signature of Applicant:
"Date of Council Meeting at which you wish to be a delegation: ûf the requested dafe ¡s not avaílable you will be contacted to select date).
Your personal inúormation is maintained in accordance with the F¡eedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. lf you have any questions regardhg the use of your personaf irúormation, please call the D¡rector of Gorporate Services for the Town at 250-847-1600.
\\serveñpccommon\wordpro\forms\admin\clelggalion to council.docx tr Dir/Ds I] D|r/FIN N Agen Date >/t DìdCS gtdg n DirturiO D lns n ln"eam Admin Asst r .t l-ire Lr r"tanncr u Agenda Plaoementi Rec. Coord n AírMgr n PcsÕ n eJther:
ACCESS SMITHERS UPDATE Page 21 of 239 Page 22 of 239 Agenda Item # 6.1.1
Page 1 of 4 APPROVED Minutes ACCESS SMITHERS MEETING 10 Oct 2017 - 12:30 pm at Smithers Town Office Present: Carmen Nikkal, Glenys Snow-Dymond, Pat Jones, Gladys Atrill, Roye Lovgren, Glenys Snow-Dymond Regrets: Linda Bayes, Lorraine Doiron Chair: Carmen Nikkal Recorder: Pat Jones
1. Welcome/Introductions – no guests present
2. Guest – It was suggested at the September 2017 workshop that no guests be invited until we have our priorities set.
3. Agenda Approved
4. Minutes of May 8, 2017 Motion #1 10Oct2017: To accept the minutes of 08 May 2017. (Pat Jones/Glenys Snow-Dymond/carried)
5. Financial Report: Motion #2 10Oct2017: To accept the treasurer’s report with the following clarification: to move the overage of 3.4 Community Awareness Pooled to 3.3 SPARC Awareness. Pat Jones/ Glenys Snow-Dymond/carried
6. Old Business a. OBJECTIVE #1: Willowvale Marsh Project i. Update 2017Oct10 1. Discussion regarding finalizing the upgrade of the flooded part of the trail. a. Waiting for a call back from Mr. Dobinson regarding the fill promised at the beginning of the project for the west side of the trail. b. Glenys S-D: She has been present at several meetings between Access Smithers group and Mr. Dobinson when the accessible switchback to the trail from his development on the west side of the parking area and the dumping of fill was discussed. The construction of an earth bridge instead of a wooden structure was presented to
ACCESS SMITHERS - OCT 10 Page 23 of 239 Agenda Item # 6.1.1
Page 2 of 4 APPROVED Minutes ACCESS SMITHERS MEETING 10 Oct 2017 - 12:30 pm at Smithers Town Office Access Smithers as a solution and agreement between the Town and Mr. Dobinson for him to have a place to move the earth from his development. Access Smithers agreed after the decision had been made. c. Received the draft guidelines from BC Parks for accessibility. d. Bat sign is installed on left side of trail. e. Signs and plaques are still being developed. Action #3 WM/DAI 2017May08: Update 2017Oct10 The application for the Town of Smithers Council speaker’s list for December 12 Council meeting is in process. It will cover an update regarding the Downtown Accessibility grant and the Willowvale project. It will also formally ask that the 6th bench be placed the small parkland in Ambleside development and that the parkland be visibly defined as a green space with rocks. Roye Lovgren also commented that there should be a compact gravel path from roadside to bench. f. The town is responsible for an erected standing handicapped sign and Glenys SD will work with Mark Allen to complete this part of the original approved project. b. OBJECTIVE 2- DOWNTOWN ACCESS IMPROVEMENT GRANT i. Roye Lovgren: NDIT will now allow accessibility as a funded item in their application. The town’s application is going in shortly for next year’s projects. ii. We received a copy of the advertisement/acknowledgment about the upgraded accessibility iii. Chamber of Commerce awards night. Some of the awards are presented from other organizations, and awards do not have to be for a business. iv. Lorraine and Glenys will do a follow up from the hand delivered letters offering grant to various businesses. c. OBJECTIVE 3: MISSION STATEMENT i. No update d. OBJECTIVE 4: MEMBERSHIP EXPANSION i. No update e. OBJECTIVE 5: CONTINUE TO BUILD AWARENESS
ACCESS SMITHERS - OCT 10 Page 24 of 239 Agenda Item # 6.1.1
Page 3 of 4 APPROVED Minutes ACCESS SMITHERS MEETING 10 Oct 2017 - 12:30 pm at Smithers Town Office i. ESS – No-one was able to attend. 2017Oct10 DAT ACTION #1: Pat to contact ESS coordinator of the workshop for a summary of the training held in September ii. Access Awareness Week f. Strategic Planning Session i. Please correct Page 5 Objective 2 to “received $5000 from Town of Smithers” in place of ‘NDIT’. g. Access Awareness Week i. The meeting went well although low turnout 1. Newspaper did not run advertisement either week despite reminders. 2. Northern realters will be invited to the celebration at Willowvale Marsh. h. Seniors Advocate: CLOSED i. Highway Traffic Signals ONGOING 2017Oct10 HTS Action #2: to monitor the non-functioning crosswalk signals at Heritage park. j. Bathroom Air Freshener at Town Office i. No update k. Loop System in Council Chambers i. Installed CLOSED
7. New Business a. Age Friendly information (Objective 5: Community Awareness) i. The town of Smithers will receive $1000 in honour of being an age-friendly town for a celebration or other commemoration of this acknowledgement. 1. Discussion 2017Oct10: Action #3: Glenys Snow-Dymond will send email accepting the money. a. Advertisement, signs up around town eg library, old church, central park, pool a. The plans for this money will be discussed at the November meeting. 2. There are 2018 Age-friendly monies available. Noted for information.
ACCESS SMITHERS - OCT 10 Page 25 of 239 Agenda Item # 6.1.1
Page 4 of 4 APPROVED Minutes ACCESS SMITHERS MEETING 10 Oct 2017 - 12:30 pm at Smithers Town Office
8. Announcements
Next Meeting – Nov 14, 2017 Town of Smithers 12:30 p.m.
ACCESS SMITHERS - OCT 10 Page 26 of 239 Agenda Item # 6.2.1
The Terms of Reference for the Smithers Regional Airport Modernization Project (AMP) committee requires the committee to report to Council on the progress at the 30%, 60% and 90% completion phases. At this time the new construction of the boarding lounge is within the first reporting status of completion (30%). Construction and preparation work for the AMP began in August with the arrival of Vector’s site superintendent and several laborers. Key Elements of construction completed include: • Removal of contaminated soil in new work area • Removal of Light Standard • Fencing Installation • Removal of old boarding lounge • Installation of temporary boarding lounge • Detour of boarding passengers to temporary boarding lounge • Installation of footings / walls for basement • Installation of Geo-Thermal heating tubes • Electrical and Heating utility rerouting for continued building use • Installation of gravity storm sewer and roof water runoff systems • Installation of floor joists At this time the budget remains intact and unaltered. Several change orders have been approved as per the project structure approvals. These changes include: 1. Issued for sanitary line location adjustment due to proximity of new footing construction 2. Issued for compaction of extra depth of soil 3. Issued for changing storm sewer from pump to gravity line 4. Issued for additional pipe for alteration of route of roof rainwater 5. Issued for rail installation for sump pump in new basement 6. Issued for installation of insulation over geo-thermal lines at road crossings for frost protection 7. Issued for installation of floor drain in basement
AIRPORT MODERNIZATION - 30% PROGRESS UPDATE - DEC 7 Page 27 of 239 Agenda Item # 6.2.1
The Photos below are indicative of the progress Vector Projects have made over the last 4 months.
AIRPORT MODERNIZATION - 30% PROGRESS UPDATE - DEC 7 Page 28 of 239 Agenda Item # 6.5.1
Visitoi lnfoNefwork Statistics Program - January - June,2017 ,,,
lnfo Centre: Smithers District Chamber of Commerc Region: NBC Main Office X Satellite o o?æ'3,-
Monthly Total Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 2017 YTD 2016 YTD 2016 Year End Totals Administration ff of hours 153.00 131 .50 160.00 126.OO 175,50 261 00 I 007:0C 974.00 2088.00 # of oarties 31 65 84 280 748 1.273 1313 4: # of parties/roaminq 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 # of visitors 41 89 89 134 440 't 338 2,131 2189 7774 É of visitors/roamino 0 0 o 0 0 c 0 0
f of buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 1 Vìsítor Orìoìn 30 65 63 83 199 488 924 1122 329S Local Resident 21 2 30 31 ?o 76 22e 233 578 BC 6 14 22 25 40 112 219, 331 900 Alberta 0 1 0 2 2 22 27 60 193 Other Canada 1 5 4 14 46 75 65 Washinoton 0 0 0 2 4 10 16 25 72 California 0 0 0 2 2 't3 17 21 62 Other US/Mexico 1 4 2 I 27 63 106 135 383 Eurooe 0 7 I 6 65 130 20e 212 774 ,| Asia/Australia 5 2 2 6 14 30 30 9€ Other 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 2 4 Niohts in Communitu I 3Á 32 ¿E l5s 336 614 780 21A1 Same dav 0 3 6 I 49 81 148 207 524 1 3 12 7 20 75 210 327 344 107C 2 3 11 5 't0 '16 34 79 125 379 3 1 2 5 Ã 7 24 49 134 4-6 11 weekl 1 3 I 4 ? 4 23 36 15 7-13 (2 weeks) 0 0 2 0 4 0 6 8 29 14+ 0 1 2 1 3 0 7 11 34 lnformafion ReouesÍed 5l 81 '11) 166 408 11'11 t93! 1A20 627Â Accommodation 3 7 5 12 52 156 235 227 765 Adventure Recreation I 21 22 28 78 144 30¡ 267 966 Attractions 3 5 10 14 63 160 251 277 951 Maos & Directions 5 6 4 l5 72 145 247 311 1't3'l Events & Conferences 0 2 5 1 0 21 2ç 33 't18 Food & Beveraoe 1 1 5 21 73 10t 90 340 Transoortation 0 I 2 3 1 5 1t 25 42 Shoppinq 0 0 5 3 2 32 43 39 197 Parks 0 1 1 1 l0 12 2a 17 134 First Nations 0 1 0 1 4 20 2( 20 70 Communitv Services 4 3 3 5 10 40 6¡ 65 210 lnvestmenVMovinq 3 2 6 2 1 7 21 4 39 Site Facilities leo. Washrooms) 7 6 15 57 206 294 243 764 Ither 17 34 40 61 Jb 86 274 202 541 Co n m u nìty SpecíJìc Info(categorìes 14 20 25 29 171 401 66( 480 2032 to be consístent øll yeør)
Local Mao 7 11 13 16 92 168 30i 256 BC Ferries 0 1 0 1 3 18 ¿: 6 25 Oomputer access 1 0 1 7 2',1 71 101 89 398 Cuestions about Alaska 0 1 1 5 10 1i 34 Fishinq 0 0 0 1 11 24 3€ 25 190 /Vildlife 0 0 0 0 4 1 2? 19 106 Phone Calls 3 1 5 2 1 16 2t 41 143 Emails 3 7 5 1 'l 0 1i 10 l-1 Hiqhwav 37 0 0 0 0 33 75 10Ê 0 20
[qEcErvED CAO Ü Dir/Ds L] I]ii¡F IÌ\J L:I Agen Dale LI Dir/CS I-l Dr¡-/WO Ll Ði:ii-; tns ln Cant Daie: -- DEC 0 4 ?011 LI Agenda F'lacement: .,trl¡ii¡ fissi. | | Fire t,.l Planner Clther:.. F,ec, Coord, I J /dr Mgr i- l PCso il Towr¡ of $rælthcr¡
VISITOR STATS Page 29 of 239 Agenda Item # 6.5.1
2/ L
Visitor lnfoNetwork Statistics Program - July - December, 2017
lnfo Centre: Smithers Distr¡ct Chamber of Commerce Region: Northern BC Main Office X Satellite o
Monthlv Total Jul Auo Sen Ocf Nov f)ec tol7YÍnil il2016YTD 2016 Year End Totals Adm¡nistret¡ôtt iltl # of hours 224 279 '149 5 157 5 1s0 1967il tl 1971 2088.00 ff of oarties 1',t61 1076 401 'to1 33 404sll ll 43?9 4359 # of oarfies - event/roamino 0 0 0 0 oilil 0 0 F of vis¡tors 2307 2011 7',19 't59 3ì 7365il lt 7734 7774 # of visitors - evenVroaminq 0 0 0 o c oilil 0 # of buses 0 0 0 0 oilil 1 1 Visilor Oriøin 2373 617 a7G lôn -1? n 4127lloll 326ç 329f Local Res¡dent 79 70 30 l8 15 43811 ll 560 57€ BC I 836 fa 97 30 I 2318il il 893 900 Alberta 45 17 11 2 0 10211 ll 193 't 9: Other C:rnnd¡ 42 38 o 6 2',l7ll ll 236 237 Wash¡noton 15 12 3 2 n 48il il 72 72 California 11 7 2 1 0 38ll ll 82 6t Other tJS/Mexico 79 5t 14 2 318il il 383 38: Eurooe 235 248 129 22 2 84511 ll 770 774 Asiâ/Ausfrâliâ 24 2e 10 3 0 s6ll ll s6 s€ Other 'l 1 2 0 0 7ilil 4 4 Nìohts in Communìtv s08 tt41 32â 71 't6 n .rq7Âll ll tt6q 21At Sâme dâv 155 15C 57 14 2 52611 ll 522 524 1 239 22! 174 26 4 999il il 1067 I 07C 2 49 4C 62 't2 3 24511 ll 379 379 3 12 12 6 1 73ll ll 134 't34 4-6 ll week) 3S I 11 I 94il il 103 'tl /-13 (2 weeks) 3 1 1 1 15ll ll 2A
14+ 5 5 3 1 24il I 32 34 Infomelion Reouested 17tl1 ltL7t 6¿6 ,7, 5? 0 602711 ll 8234 627( Accommodation 't75 14s 91 23 1 67011 ll 760 76Í Advenlure Recreâtion )?5 249. 116 28 7 930il il 961 96€ Attractions 208 '177 80 20 2 74311 ll 956 95 lvlaps & Directions 3l 277 42 't2 12 92911 ll 1't28 1131 Events & Conferences 26 2A 6 2 2 93il il 't'16 11€ g5 Food & Beveraoe 100 .1n 4 1 34011 ll 340 34C Transnorlalion 10 3 l3 4 0 42il I 42 42 Shoooino 58 73 ?5 o n '199il il 196 197 Parks t6 J1 15 2 0 69ll ll 134 134 First Nations 15 13 7 0 0 61il il 7A 7( Communitv Services 84 58 1S 8 0 23411 ll 21n 21C 2C lnvesf ment/Movino 16 I 4 1 sSll ll 39 Site Facilities feo- Washroomsl 329 243 73 ?o 7 q66il il 76t 76' Other 148 8, 115 53 1S 693il il 520 541 Com mu nitv S pecifrc I nfo (cøtesories 54'l 120 r99 39 20 0 187911 ll 2014 2032 Local Map 283 204 7'l 19 l0 89411 ll s60 s64 BC Ferries lnformation 10 5 3 0 0 41il il 25 25 Computer/ internet use 110 8S 54 I 1 36411 ll 398 398 Quest¡ons about Alaska 1 2 0 0 20ll ll 63 6: Fishino 32 18 14 0 0 100il il 190 190 Wildlife 32 32 14 1 0 r02ll ll 106 10€ Phone Calls 18 30 19 6 I 11011 ll 130 143 3 5 5 2 0 32il [ 22 23 l¡ohwâv 37 36 17 2 0 21611 ll 120 12(
VISITOR STATS Page 30 of 239 Agenda Item # 6.7.1
Mayor’s Report for December 12, 2017
Nov 29: Attended a meeting of the Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chiefs
Nov 30: Met with Glenys Snowdymond regarding the Willowvale Wetlands and what is required in order to complete the group’s accessibility improvements
Nov 30: Met with Tristan Jones, Ministerial Assistant to the Hon. Doug Donaldson, Minister of Forests, Lands, Resource Operations and Rural Development
Nov 30: Attended a Community-to-Community Forum between the Office of the Wet’suwet’en and the Village of Telkwa, as their invited guest.
Dec 1: Chaired Transit Committee meeting
Dec 6-7: Attended the first meetings of the BC Government’s Climate Solutions and Clean Growth Advisory Council in Vancouver
Dec 8: Attending a celebration of the 20th Anniversary of the Delgamuukw Gisday’wa court decision, being held in Hagwilget
Dec 8: Attending the Town staff’s Christmas Social
Dec 12: Attending Positive Living Northwest’s annual Christmas Luncheon
MAYOR'S REPORT - DEC 12 Page 31 of 239 Page 32 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
REPORT TO COUNCIL
DATE: October 31, 2017 REPORT: DEV 17-043
FROM: Yazmin Hernandez, Planner FILE: 3030-20
SUBJECT: Proposed Text Amendments to Sign Bylaw No. 1789 and Proposed Strategy for Temporary Signs Along Highway 16
RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council support text amendments to Sign Bylaw No. 1789 as outlined in Attachment 2 of report DEV 17-043.
AND THAT Council support Staff enforcement strategy for Temporary Signs along Highway 16.
BACKGROUND: The 2017 Smithers Sign Spruce Up Program awarded 26 grants to property and business owners to restore or redesign retail and commercial building signage downtown. The past eigth months of enforcement of the new bylaw have revealed a need to clarify the language and strengthen some provisions in Sign Bylaw 1789 (Attachment 1). In a separate, yet concurrent process, Council directed staff to engage with business owners along Highway 16 regarding temporary signs regulations. On May 29th, 2017 staff hosted a public workshop to collect feedback on temporary sign regulation and implementation along the Highway Corridor. As outlined in report DEV 17-031, the main messages from business owners to Council and staff was that the signage needs of Highway 16 businesses are distinct from Downtown commercial businesses and different among Highway 16 businesses. At the June 27, 2017 Regular meeting Council made the following motion: MOVED THAT the matter of temporary highway signs, be postponed to a future meeting of Staff's choosing, to allow Council to consider amendments to existing sign regulations. CARRIED
CAO Dir/DS Dir/FIN Agen Date: November 28, 2017 Dir/CS Dir/WO Bldg Ins In-Cam Date: Admin Asst. Fire Planner Agenda Placement: Staff ‘A’ Dir /Rec Air/Mgr PCSO Other:
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 33 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
Regular Page 2 Report: DEV 17-043
DISCUSSION: This section outlines proposed text amendments for Sign Bylaw 1789 and recommends an enforcement strategy for Highway 16 Temporary Signs.
1) HOUSEKEEPING TEXT AMENDMENTS - Over the past eight months, Staff have reviewed Sign Bylaw No. 1789 and identified the need for nine housekeeping amendments to the bylaw. These proposed changes are minor wording changes to clarify the intent of the regulation and are outlined in more detail in Attachment 2 Proposed Text Amendments to Sign Bylaw No. 1789.
2) TEMPORARY SIGNS ALONG HIGHWAY 16 - After a thorough review of the options and businesses’ feedback, Staff recommend enforcement of the bylaw once the proposed Sign Bylaw amendments are adopted.
Sign Bylaw 1789 was adopted on January 2017 after a multi-year process involving public consultation. The Sign Bylaw provides clear general guidelines and ensures a level playing field among businesses. Bylaws are, by nature, insensitive to the peculiarities of individual properties or businesses. It is for this reason that the Local Government Act established a Development Variance Permit (DVP) process. No one Sign Bylaw can anticipate each development and business signage scenario.
Council can consider different design solutions to meet the goals of the Sign Bylaw, including the Alpine Theme through the DVP process. A DVP is a legal mechanism that allows a property owner or a business owner to pitch their unique signage needs and make a formal proposal to Council on how they can meet the intent of the Sign Bylaw (i.e. safety, aesthetics, level playfield, effective use of signs as a means of communication) while addressing their particular business needs. A DVP application requires a neighbour notification process through which Council can garner the opinion of residents and owners. APC and Council review each DVP application on its own merits. Council can impose conditions associated with the granting of a variance as long as the conditions are related to the requested variance.
RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS: Staff time required to prepare a formal bylaw amendment and bring it back to Council at a future date for First and Second readings. A Development Variance Permit takes an average of 60 business days. The process involves Staff preparing a neighbour notification mail out, scheduling an APC meeting and preparing a report for the APC and a report to Council. There is a $400 processing fee associated with this permit.
POLICY CONSIDERATIONS: • OCP, Section 18.4: “The character of development within the Highway 16 corridor should reflect certain elements of the Alpine Theme; yet acknowledge that larger scale commercial buildings should realistically interpret the Alpine Theme more broadly. Specific objectives of the Highway 16 commercial corridor are to:
Ensure that the form and character create a pleasant and welcoming experience for both visitors and community members;
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 34 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
Regular Page 3 Report: DEV 17-043
Reinforce the relationship of Hwy. 16 as a gateway to downtown Smithers;
Encourage designs that respect and respond positively to the surrounding natural and built environment.”
• OCP, Section 18.2.7, Policy 3: “Regulation of sign size and type is necessary to set upper limits on business sign competition and to prevent an escalation in sign size, animation and flash at the expense of pedestrian scale, architectural character and streetscape. Guidelines include:
Branding. New developments should be creative in incorporating the intent of these guidelines into corporate logos, brands and identities as expressed in the design and materials of signage.
Scale & Presence. Commercial buildings should provide signage that identifies the business and is appropriately scaled. When new signage is applied to an existing building, it should provide the appearance that the signage was part of the original building design. Signage should be in proportion to the look of the entire building.”
COMMUNICATION: As part of the bylaw amendment process, two newspaper advertisements will be placed in the Interior News to provide the public an opportunity to provide comments. No public mail outs are required as the amendment impacts more than 10 properties/owners as per Section 466 (7) of the Local Government Act.
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Status quo: do not proceed with amending Sign Bylaw No. 1789
2. Alter the recommended amendments, or make further amendments to the bylaw.
3. Provide alternate direction regarding enforcement strategy of Sign Bylaw along the Highway 16 corridor.
Respectfully submitted by: Submission approved by:
______Yazmin Hernandez, MCIP, RPP Anne Yanciw Planner Chief Administrative Officer
Attachment 1 – Sign Bylaw No. 1789 Attachment 2 – Proposed Text Amendments to Sign Bylaw No. 1789
YHB/MFA
n:\planning\projects\hwy 16 temporary signs workshop\reports\dev 17-043 sign bylaw proposed amendments.docx
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 35 of 239 Page 36 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
Sffiiîther
BYLAW NO. 1789 S'Gru BYLAW A bylaw to regulate srþns
WHEREAS the Town of Smithers may, by bylaw, regulate the number, size, type, form, appearance and location of signs;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Town of Smithers, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows:
1.0 ADM¡NISTRATIVEPROVISIONS
1.1 This bylaw may be cited as "Bylaw No. 1789 - Sign Bylaw" and takes effect as of the date of adoption.
1.2 This bylaw repeals "Bylaw No. 1661 - Sign Bylaw". 1.3 lf any portion of this bylaw is found invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall be severed and the severance shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the bylaw.
2.O DEFINITIONS
2.1 ln this bylaw
Backlit Sign means any sign illuminated from an internal light source
Balloon Sign means a temporary sign made up of an inflated, 3-dimensíonal device, intended to attract the attention of persons to a business or undertaking.
Banner Sign means a temporary sign made up of lightweight fabric or other similar material, which can be hung from a building face or on a structure.
Business Frontage means the side of a building that faces a street and contains the main entrance of the business.
Gommercial Message means any wording, logo, or other representation that directly or indirectly, names, advertises, or calls attention to a business, product, service or other commercial activity.
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 37 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
TOWN OF SMITHERS SIGN BYLAW NO. 1789 Page 2
Construction Sign means a temporary sign indicating that a building project on the same property on which the sign is located is about to be undertaken or is currently in progress.
Gommunity Event Sign means a temporary sign advertising an activity sponsored by a registered non-profit corporation, club, church, school, community group or similar.
Director means the Director of Development Services or Bylaw Enforcement Officer for the Town of Smithers, or designate.
Fascia Sign means a permanent sign that displays only one sign surface and is attached parallel to or painted on the surface of a building or structure, including any permanent building fixture, and is supported by such building or structure.
Freestanding Sign means a permanent sign that is self-supporting and is not connected to a building.
Frontlit Sign means a sign illuminated from an external light source.
Hanging Sign means a permanent sign suspended under a canopy, awning or similar feature and perpendicular to the building face.
Home Occupation Sign means any sign for the purpose of advertising a home occupation that is consistent with a valid Town of Smithers Business License.
Person means any individual, association, company, corporation, firm, organization, or partnership singular or plural, of any kind.
Political Sign means a temporary sign intended to promote the activities or the cause of any political group or to encourage or discourage any person to vote in any manner at an election or public referendum, whether Federal, Provincial, or Municipal.
Projecting Sign means a permanent sign that is perpendicular to the building face and is attached to the building, excluding a hanging sign.
Roof Line means the horizontal line joining the points of intersection of the exterior wall of the building with the roof of the building. In the case of a building with a pitched roof, the roof line shall be at the eaves line.
Sandwich Board Sign means a temporary sign with no electrical power supply, supported only by its own weight.
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 38 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
TOWN OF SMITHERS SIGN BYLAW NO. 1789 Page 3
Sign means any structure, device, fixture, or visual representation that uses colour, form, graphic, illumination, symbol, or writing to advertise, announce the purpose of, or identify the purpose of a person or entity, or to communicate information of any kind to the public.
Sign Area means the total area of a sign including the outer edge of the sign frame or sign border but where a sign has no frame or border, means the area contained within the smallest square or rectangle that will enclose all of the copy of the sign. ln the case of a double-face or multi-face sign the area shall be calculated by adding together the area of all sign faces visible from any one point. When 2 sign faces are placed back to back, the sign area shall be the area of the larger of the 2 faces.
Sign H'eight means the vertical distance measured from the average level of finished grade to the highest point of the sign, including supportive framework or bracing.
Town of Smithers Tree Sign means a directional sign prescribed by the Town, located on Main Street, directing traffic to businesses off Main Street within the C-14 and C-18 zones of the downtown core.
Site means any lot or number of lots that are of sufficient area and dimension to meet minimum zoning requirements for atea, coverage, and use, and any other zoning regulations regardless of the presence of ínternal legal boundaries, which is used for a single purpose or development.
Town means the Town of Smithers
Zone(s) means the area which the Town is divided into a zone or zones in accordance with the Town of Smithers Zoning Bylaw.
3.0 APPL¡CATION OF BYLAW
3.1 No sign shall be erected, placed, displayed, altered or moved within the Town of Smithers except in accordance with the provisions of this bylaw.
3.2 All measurements in this bylaw are expressed in the metric system. The approximate equivalent in the imperial system is provided for convenience only.
3.3 lllustrations included in this bylaw are for convenience only
Non-Conforminq Siqns
3.4 A sign in existence at the time of adoption of this bylaw must not be replaced, altered, rebuilt or relocated in any way unless in conformity with the provisions of this bylaw.
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 39 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
TOWN OF SMITHERS SIGN BYLAW NO. 1789 Page 4
3.5 Despite Section 3.4, a sign in existence at the time of adoption of this bylaw may continue to be used and maintained provided that it does not cause unlawful obstruction or pose a hazard as per the provisions of this bylaw.
Variances
3.6 Signs authorized by the Town of Smithers Council through issuance of a Development Variance Permit or Form and Character Development Permit are considered lavyfulwhile the permit remains valid.
Exemptions
3.7 This bylaw does not apply to:
a) Signs authorized by the Town, Province of BC or Government of Canada by statutes, orders, bylaws, regulations or requirement;
b) Signs authorized by the Town, or erected or placed under the direction of the Town, on Town owned land or road right of way;
c) lnformational signs of a public utility regarding its poles, lines, pipes, or facilities.
d) Signs authorized by the Town in connection with public conveniences, including bench and bus shelter signs that contain no commercial message;
e) Signs located inside a building or affixed to the inside of a window with a combined area the lesser of 25o/o of the window in which they are located.
f) Die-cut decal signs (no background or transparent background only) and incidental third party opaque decal signs, such as memberships, tourism promotions and security systems, on the exterior of a window with a combined area the lesser o1 25o/o of the window on which they are located.
s) Temporary paper or cardboard posters and placards within a window advertising an event or sale.
h) Works of art, murals or holiday lights that do not include a commercial or political message;
i) Flags made up of a single piece of fabric hanging from a pole or poles that contains the colours, patterns, or symbols of a government or country and contains no commercial message and is not larger lhan 2 m' (21 5 ft')
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 40 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
TOWN OF SMITHERS SIGN BYLAW NO. 1789 Page 5
j) Signs on motor vehicles;
k) lncidental signs with a functional purpose incidental to the use of the site on which it is located and conveys information such as "no parking", "entrance", "loading only", "vacancy", "no vacancy" and other similar signs to a maximum area of 1.5 m'. No sign with a commercial message shall be considered an incidental sign or shall be illuminated except in accordance with the provisions of this bylaw.
r) Signs warning of an imminent physical hazard or danger and signs prohibiting trespass.
4.0 PROHIBITED SIGNS
4.1 Signs that are not specifically permitted in this bylaw are prohibited
4.2 Prohibited signs include, but are not limited to
a) Abandoned signs that pertain to an event that has passed or purpose of which no longer applies or advertises a business which does not have a valid Town of Smithers Business License.
b) Animated or flashing signs on which movement or change of lighting is used to depict action, change of messaging or create a special effect, but excludes digital time or temperature display.
c) Moving signs which physically as a whole or a portion moves in any way
d) Temporary freestanding signs or portable signs not permanently attached to the ground or other permanent structure, excluding Sandwich Board Signs.
e) Roof signs located on and over the roof of a building or any sign that extends past the roof line.
f) Signs with neon tubing, except as permitted in Section 7.9 of this bylaw.
g) Any sign which contains indecent or obscene pictures, drawings, or words
5.0 SIGN PERMITS
5.1 Except where expressly authorized or exempt under this bylaw, no person may erect, place, construct, relocate, or alter a sign without first obtaining a sign permit for that sign.
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 41 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
TOWN OF SM¡THERS SIGN BYLAW NO. 1789 Page 6
5.2 No Sign Permit shall be issued for an existing or proposed sign that is contrary to this bylaw.
5.3 Where a Form and Character Development Permit or a Development Variance Permit is issued which approves a sign, a Sign Permit is not required.
Application
5.4 A Sign Permit Application shall include:
a) A completed sign permit application form;
b) Drawing(s) to scale for each sign, showing dimensions, supporting structure, height above finished grade, colour scheme, materials, copy and details of any lighting and surrounding framework;
c) Drawing(s) or photograph(s) showing the proposed position of the sign on the building together with any existing signs;
d) Site plan showing sign placement, including the setbacks to existing signs, buildings and property boundaries;
e) Additional information, as required to determine compliance
0 Supporting documents for any sign located on a road right-of-way, as required in Section 10 of this bylaw.
g) Applicable fee set out in Section 5.5 of this bylaw
Permit Fees
5.5 Sign Permit fee per sign
SIGN TYPE FEE PER SIGN Balloon Sign, Banner Sign, Canopy Sign, $25.00 Fascia Sign, Hanging Sign Freestanding Sign, Projecting Sign $50.00 Sandwich Board Sign Town of Smithers Tree Sign $150.00
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 42 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
TOWN OF SMITHERS S¡GN BYLAW NO. 1789 Page 7
6.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS
6.1 A sign may only advertise a business or use which is operating in compliance with a valid Town of Smithers Business License and the Town of Smithers Zoning Bylaw.
6.2 No sign may contain any commercial message except advertising for goods and services offered on the premises where the sign is located.
Construction
6.3 All signs must comply with applícable provisions of the BC Building Code and the BC Electrical Code and be in compliance with these codes at all times with the required approvals maintained.
6.4 All wiring and conduits must be placed below grade or othenryise concealed.
Location
6.5 All signs must be located entirely on private property, except where specifically permitted by this bylaw.
6.6 No sign shall:
a) lnterfere with the placement or use of any equipment or structure required for any Town purpose;
b) Pose a hazard to any person or property.
6.7 Any sign extending over an area accessible by motor vehicles must have a minimum vertical clearance of 4.5 m (14'9") and a minimum vertical clearance of 2.4 m (8') above grade if extending over an area accessible by pedestrians.
6.8 No sign shall obscure or obstruct vision:
c) Within 5 m (17') of intersecting lot lines where two road right of ways meet, excluding where a sign is located in the C-1, C-14 and C-18 zones;
d) Along a road right-of-way, obstruct pedestrian or vehicle movement in a manner unacceptable to the Director.
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 43 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
TOWN OF SMITHERS SIGN BYLAW NO. 1789 Page I
7.0 DESIGN STANDARDS
Number of Siqns
7.1 A maximum of two permanent signs per business are permitted per business frontage and in addition, the following signs:
a) One freestanding sign per property abutting arterial Highway 16, as permitted by this bylaw;
b) Temporary signs, including sandwich board signs, as permitted by this bylaw.
7.2 One additional sign is permitted per additional building face, other than on the business frontage, which is occupied by the business.
7.3 Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 7.1 and 7.2, a Home Occupation Sign is limited to 1 permanent sign per business per property.
Size
7.4 The size of each sign shall conform to the regulations of this bylaw for that particular type of sign.
Liqhtins
7.5 Only signs in commercial zones may be illuminated in accordance with this Section.
7.6 Signs located in the C-1, C-1A & C-18 zones are permitted to be frontlit only
7.7 Signs located in all other commercial zones are permitted to either be:
a) Frontlit;
b) Backlit provided that only individual letters or symbols or a halo immediately surrounding individual letters or symbols illuminate with the remaining sign face materials or fabrics opaque as to not allow light to pass through. This includes backlit channel letters.
BACKLIT LETTERS $tAft¡pr û,FiLTLdli6 CHANNEL IETTER5
7.8 Lighting must be limited to the sign surface only
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 44 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
TOWN OF SMITHERS SIGN BYLAW NO. 1789 Page 9
7.9 Notwithstanding the provisions of this bylaw, neon tubing is only permitted for incidental signs with the words "vacancy/no vacancy".
Materials & Letterinq
7.10 All sign materials and hardware must be durable and weather resistant
7.11 Signs made from flexible vinyl, plastic, canvas or similar materials are only permitted for temporary signs.
7.12 Permanent signs located in C-1, C-14 and C-18 zones between Highway 16 and Railway Avenue must incorporate relief in the form of recessed, routed, raised or die-cut letters.
7.13 Permanent signs located in all other commercial zones must incorporate one or more of the following materials or lettering:
a) Wood; b) Metal, excluding aluminum, alupanel or similar composite material; c) Glass; d) Lettering that is recessed, routed, raised or die-cut.
7.14 Notwithstanding Section 7.13 (b), permanent signs made from aluminum, alupanel or similar composite materials are permitted only when one or more of the materials or lettering listed in Section 7.13 are used.
7.15 Section 7.12 and7.13 do not apply to temporary signs
8.0 SIGN SPECIFIC REGULATIONS . SIGN PERMIT REQUIRED
8.1 The types of signs in this section are authorized in accordance with sign-specific regulations provided that a valid sign permit has been obtained from the Town.
Balloon Siqns
8.2 Temporary balloon signs are permitted only in commercial zones, subject to the following regulations:
a) lnstalled for a maximum of 30 days per calendar year;
b) Securely fastened to prevent excessive movement.
Banner Signs
8.3 Temporary banner signs are permitted only in commercial, industrial and public use zones, subject to the following regulations:
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 45 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
TOWN OF SMITHERS SIGN BYLAW NO. 1789 Page 10
a) Maximum area of 10 m2 (107 ft2);
b) lnstalled for a maximum of 30 days per,calendar yeaï
c) Attached to its support in such a way as to prevent flapping.
Fascia Siqns
8.4 Fascia signs are permitted in all zones, subject to the following regulations:
a) Maximum area of 0.3 m2 per 1 m (1 ft2 per 1') of building frontage;
b) Not extend above the top of the roof line or beyond the side of a building;
c) May encroach over a road right-of-way only in accordance with Section 10 of this bylaw.
Freestandinq Siqns
8.5 Freestanding Signs are permitted in all zones, subject to the following regulations:
a) Maximum area of 10 m2 (107 fÔ;
b) Maximum height of 5 m (16') except for freestanding signs located on properties fronting Highway 16, outside of the Downtown Commercial designation, as defined by the Official Community Plan, shall not exceed a maximum height of 7 m (23');
c) Spaced a distance of 50 m (164') from any other freestanding sign on the same site which has an area greater than 3 m'(321();
d) Attached to a permanent base with a valid Town of Smithers Building Permit.
Hanqinq Sions
8.6 Hanging Signs are permitted in all zones, subject to the following regulations
a) Maximum area of 0.6 m2 (6.5 ft2);
b) Minimum vertical clearance o12.4 m (8') above grade;
c) Not extend horizontally beyond the limits of a canopy or awning;
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 46 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
TOWN OF SMITHERS SIGN BYLAW NO. 1789
Page 11
d) May hang over a road right-of-way only in accordance with Section 10 of this bylaw.
Projectins Siqns
8.7 Projecting Signs are permitted in all zones, subject to the following regulations:
a) Maximum area of 3 m2 13ztt2¡;
b) Maximum projection of 2 m (6'7') from the building to which it is attached;
c) Minimum vertical clearance of 2.4 m (8') above grade;
d) May project over a road right-of-way only in accordance with Section 10 of this bylaw.
Sandwich Board Signs
8.8 Sandwich Board Signs are permitted in commercial, industrial and public use zones, subject to the following regulations:
a) Maximum size of 0.6 m (2') horizontal by 1.2 m (4') vertical and shall be stable;
b) Maximum of two signs per business, per site.
8.9 Sandwich Board Signs in the C-1, C-1A & C-18 zones are permitted on a pedestrian road right-of-way provided that:
a) Maximum size of 0.6 m (2') horizontal by 1.2 m (4') vertical and shall be stable;
b) Highway License of Occupation Agreement has been entered into in accordance with Section 10 of this bylaw;
c) Displayed only during operating hours of the business or activity to which the sign pertains;
1..5 m width d) Maximum one sign is placed along maintalned the frontage of the business or activity a---_J tl to which the sign pertains and there is (-----+ a minimum 1.5 m clear unimpeded pedestrian access width maintained.
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 47 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
TOWN OF SMITHERS SIGN BYLAW NO. 1789 Page 12
9.0 SIGN SPECIFIC REGULATIONS . SIGN PERMIT NOT REQUIRED
9.1 The types of signs described in this section are authorized in accordance with the sign-specific regulations without need for a valid sign permit from the Town. Construction Siqns
9.2 Construction signs are permitted in all zones, subject to the following regulations
a) Maximum 5 m2 15+ ft2) area and a maximum height of 5 m (33').
b) Located only on the property where construction has started and where a valid Building Permit has been issued;
c) Removed within 15 days after completion of construction on the property;
Communitv Event Siqns
9.3 Temporary Community Event Signs are permitted in all zones, subject to the following regulations:
a) Maximum area of I m2 186 ft2¡;
b) lnstalled a maximum of 30 days and removed upon event completion;
c) May be located in a road right-of-way provided that a Highway License of Occupation Agreement has been entered into with the Town for any sign over 1.5 m' (16 ft') in area in accordance with Section 10 of this bylaw.
Home Occupation Siqns
9.4 Home Occupation Signs are permitted in all residential and agricultural zones, including non-conforming residential uses in any other zone, subject to the following regulations:
a) ln the R-1, R-2 & R-24 zones the maximum area is 1 m2 (11 frl and the maximum height is 2 m (6.5');
b) ln all other residential zones, A-1 zone and non-conforming residential uses in other zones, the maximum area is 2 m2 (22 ft\ and the maximum heightis3m(10').
Real Estate Siqns
9.5 Temporary Real Estate Signs advertising a property "for sale", "for rent" or "for lease" are permitted in all zones, subject to the following regulations:
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 48 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
TOWN OF SMITHERS SIGN BYLAW NO. 1789 Page 13
a) Maximum area of 5 m2 15+ ft2) and a maximum height of 5 m (16');
b) Located only upon the site referred to on the sign or on a road right of way immediately adjacent to the site in accordance with Section 10 of this bylaw;
c) Signs are permitted in a road right-of-way advertising an open house on the day of the open house to maximum of 6 signs, each being no greater than 1 m2, per open house.
Political Siqns
9.6 Political signs are permitted in all zones only during Federal, Provincial or Municipal election or referendum periods in accordance with Provincial or Federal legislations, subject to the following regulations:
a) May be located in a road right-of-way provided that a Highway License of Occupation Agreement has been entered into with the Town for any sign over 1 .5 m'(16 ft') in area in accordance with Section 10 of this bylaw;
b) Not be located on freehold land owned by the Town or in flower beds and formal landscaped areas;
c) Signs are deemed to be the property of and to have been erected, placed, installed, displayed or maintained by the person(s) whose name(s) are displayed thereon;
d) Removed within 7 days after the election day.
1O.O SIGNS ON OR OVER A ROAD R¡GHT.OF.WAY
10.1 The owner o1 a sign permitted by this bylaw to project or hang over a road right- of-way, including a pedestrian sidewalk, must first submit to the Director the following for approval:
a) Enter into an Encroachment Agreement with the Town;
b) Drawings showing a minimum vertical clearance of 2.4 m (8') Min.2.4 m (8) Clearance above grade and maximum ¡, Max. 0.6 m (2') From Curb horizontal projection of 0.6 m (2') from a curb line.
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 49 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
TOWN OF SMITHERS SIGN BYLAW NO. 1789 Page 14
c) Certificate of lnsurance in that includes the Town of Smithers as "Additional Insured" that indemnifies the Town against any and all forms of liability to a minimum of $2,000,000.
10.2 The owner of a sign permitted by this bylaw to be located on a road right-of-way, including Town owned property, must first submit to the Director the following for approval:
a) Enter into a Highway License of Occupation Agreement with the Town for all Sandwich Board Signs or any sign 1.5 m' or larger.
b) Certificate of lnsurance that includes the Town of Smithers as "Additional lnsured" that indemnifies the Town against any and all forms of liability to a minimum of $2,000,000.
10.3 Each policy of insurance must be maintained by the owner of the sign so long as the sign remains on or over the road right-of-way or on Town owned property.
10.4 Ensure the maintenance and use of the sign is in compliance with the terms of the Sign Permit and this bylaw.
I I.O ENFORCEMENT
General Authoritv for Orders
11.1 lf the Director determines that an owner or occupier of property has not complied with any provision of this bylaw, or a sign permit issued under this bylaw, the Director may, by notice in writing, make an order directing the person to do any of the following:
a) Bring the sign and the property into compliance;
b) Discontinue and refrain from proceeding with any work that has been commenced or is in progress;
c) Repair, alter or remove a sign; and may specify in the order a date by which the person must remedy the noncompliance.
Duty to Comply
11.2 No person shall fail to comply with any order issued by the Director or by resolution of Council under this bylaw.
Delivery
11.3 An order shall be sufficiently delivered if:
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 50 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
TOWN OF SMITHERS SIGN BYLAW NO. 1789 Page 15
a) lt has been left with the person to whom it is directed;
b) Mailed by registered mail to the owner at their address as it appears on the records of the Assessment Authority of British Columbia;
c) lf it has been mailed to or left with a person who appears to be carrying on business within the premises;
d) ln the case of a corporation, if it has been mailed to the address registered as its records office; or
e) A copy of the order has been posted at the affected premises
Maintenance
11.4 All signs and their supporting structures shall be continuously maintained so that they are structurally sound and free from all hazards.
11.5 Sign area, background, lighting and embellishments must be continuously maintained so that the sign does not exhibit wear, neglect or damage.
Offences
11.6 Any of the following shall be considered an offence, and each day the violation is caused or allowed to continue shall constitute a separate offence, and is punishable according to the Offence Act.
a) To install, create, erect, construct, place, structurally alter, relocate, rebuild, enlarge, or maintain any sign requiring a Building Permit, without first obtaining a Building Permit, as required.
b) To install, create, erect, construct, place, structurally alter, relocate, rebuild, enlarge, or maintain any sign in a way that is inconsistent with a Sign Permit, Form and Character Development Permit or Development Variance Permit.
c) To install, create, erect, construct, place, structurally alter, relocate, rebuild, enlarge, or maintain any sign contrary to, or inconsistent with, any provision of this bylaw.
d) To fail to remove or correct any sign that is installed, created, erected, constructed, placed, altered, enlarged, or maintained contrary to, inconsistent with, or prohibited by, any provision of this bylaw, or other Town bylaw when ordered to do so by the Director.
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 51 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
TOWN OF SMITHERS SIGN BYLAW NO. 1789 Page 16
Penaltv
11.7 Each offence, upon summary conviction, shall be liable to a penalty up to $5,000.00 and not less than $100.00, plus the cost of prosecution, for each offence.
11.8 The Director is authorized to enter onto any property at any reasonable time, to ascertain whether the requirements of this bylaw are being met.
11.9 The Director may order, in writing, the correction or removal of any work, which is in contravention of this bylaw.
Removal
11.10 Any signs erected or placed on a road right of way, or other Town owned property, not constructed or placed in strict compliance with the requirements of this bylaw, shall be forfeited to the Town and subject to confiscation. In addition to other remedies hereunder, the Town shall have the right to recover from the owner or person placing the sign the full costs of removal and disposal of that sign.
11.11 The Director may undertake any works or actions necessary, including the removal of the sign, to enforce this bylaw or to protect the safety of persons or property, where any sign is:
a) Prohibited;
b) Located in any manner contrary to this bylaw;
c) ln immediate danger of falling; or
d) An immediate hazard to the safety of persons or property;
ln addition to other remedies hereunder, the Director shall have the right to recover from the owner or person placing the sign the full costs of its actions or works, or the removal and disposal of that sign.
Reclaiminq a Siqn
11.12 An owner of the property or the sign seeking to reclaim a sign that has been removed by the Town pursuant to this bylaw must submit a request in writing to the Director, within 14 days of the date of removal, transportation or storage of the sign. Before reclaiming such sign, the owner must pay for the cost of removal, transportation and storage. lf the sign is not reclaimed within 30 days, the Director may order such sign destroyed or disposed of in any manner deemed appropriate and any and all costs incurred by the Town for removal,
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 52 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
TOWN OF SMITHERS SIGN BYLAW NO. 1789 Page 17
transportation, storage and disposal of the sign may be recovered as a debt from the owner.
Collectíon of Debt for Taxes
11.13 Where the Director has undertaken the repair, alteration, removal, transportation, storage or disposal of a sign, or any combination of these, as a result of a person failing to comply with an order of the Director or a resolution of Council, any debt owing for costs incurred by the Town that has not been paid by December 31't may be collected in the same manner as for property taxes in arrears.
Reconsideration of an Order 11.14 A person who has received an order issued by the Director under this bylaw may seek reconsideration by Council by notifying the Town's Corporate Officer within 5 business days of receiving the notice. The matter may be heard, in person or through written representations, at the next or subsequent regular meeting of Council, or sooner as may be arranged between the person and the Corporate Officer. After the person has had an opportunity to be heard, Council may confirm, vary, modify or cancel the decision of the Director, and may impose any terms, conditions, restrictions or requirements in relation to the matter that are effective as an order under this Bylaw from the date the resolution is made.
READ A FIRST TIME THIS 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2016"
READ A SECOND TIME THIS 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2016.
READ A TH¡RD TIME THIS 26TH DAY OF JULY 2016.
RESCINDED TH]RD READING THIS gTH DAY OF AUGUST 2016
RE-READ A THIRD TIME THIS 23RD DAY OF AUGUST 2016.
ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016.
Taylor Yanc Mayor Corporate inistrator (CAO)
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 53 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
TOWN OF SMITHERS SIGN BYLAW NO. 1789 Page 18
CERTIFIED A TRUE & CORRECT COPY of Bylaw No. 1789 cited as "Bylaw No. 1789 - Sign Bylaw"
t}P/auU¿ DiannaÞlouÍf{ Corporate Officer
AW n:\wordpro\bylaws\bylaws frm 1750 to current\bl 1789 - s¡gn bylaw.dob -
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 54 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
Attachment 2 to Report DEV 17-043 Council meeting: Nov 28, 2017
Proposed Text Amendments to Sign Bylaw No. 1789
1) Add the following terms to Bylaw 1789, Sec. 2.0 Definitions
Currently one could argue that the definition of Fascia Signs encompass awning and canopy signs: “Fascia Sign means a permanent sign that displays only one sign surface and is attached parallel to or painted on the surface of a building or structure, including any permanent building fixture, and is supported by such building or structure.”
Bylaw 1789 is ambiguous when it comes to awning and canopy signs. This is particularly problematic when the existing fee schedule lists a permit fee of $25 for canopy signs. Staff are recommending definitions for canopy and awning signs are included in the bylaw to differentiate them from fascia signs. Given commonly challenged interpretations of the bylaw, Staff are also recommending to define the terms temporary sign and day. Box 1 shows all proposed definitions to be added.
Box 1 – Bylaw 1789, Section 2.0 Definitions Awning means a movable or temporary hood or cover, composed of non-rigid materials, which projects from the wall of a building. Canopy means a permanent hood, cover or shelter, other than a projecting roof, which projects from the wall of a building. Day means a calendar day
Canopy Sign means a sign attached to or constructed in or on the face of a canopy. Awning Sign means a non-illuminated identification sign painted or affixed flat against the surface of an awning and which does not extend vertically or horizontally beyond the
limits of such awning. Temporary Sign means a sign made from flexible vinyl, plastic, canvas or similar materials, or a sign whose message is meant to be displayed for a limited period of time or a sign that is not permanently installed or affixed to the ground or a building. 2) Amend Bylaw 1789, Sec. 4.0 Prohibited Signs
The list of prohibited signs currently does not include awning signs. While Bylaw 1789, Sec. 4.1 does state that signs not specifically permitted are prohibited this clause is typically included to protect against unforeseen developments in signage or an oversight in the drafting of the regulation.
1
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 55 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
Attachment 2 to Report DEV 17-043 Council meeting: Nov 28, 2017
Based on the inability of awning signs to meet the Town’s Alpine Theme, including material and lettering requirements, Staff recommend Council include awning signs in the list of prohibited signs to avoid ambiguity. Box 2 shows existing bylaw text in italic font, bolded italic font indicates proposed new text, bolded crossed out sections are existing text that would be eliminated.
Box 2 – Bylaw 1789, Sec. 4.0 Prohibited Signs
4.1 Signs that are not specifically permitted in this bylaw are prohibited
4.2 Prohibited signs include, but are not limited to:
a) Abandoned signs that pertain to an event that has passed or purpose of which no longer applies or advertises a business which does not have a valid Town of Smithers Business License.
b) Animated or flashing signs on which movement or change of lighting is used to depict action, change of messaging or create a special effect, but excludes
digital time or temperature display.
c) Moving signs which physically as a whole or a portion moves in any way
d) Temporary freestanding signs or portable signs not permanently attached to the ground or other permanent structure, excluding Sandwich Board Signs.
e) Roof signs located on and over the roof of a building or any sign that extends past the roof line.
f) Signs with neon tubing, except as permitted in Section 7.9 of this bylaw.
g) Any sign which contains indecent or obscene pictures, drawings, or words
h) Awning Signs
2
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 56 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
Attachment 2 to Report DEV 17-043 Council meeting: Nov 28, 2017
3) Amend Bylaw 1789, Sec. 5.5 Permit Fees
Staff are proposing a housekeeping amendment to the fees schedule. Hanging sign permit fee would increase from $25 to $50 to reflect the fact that these type of signs require additional administrative follow up in the form of an encroachment agreement.
Box 3 shows the bylaw’s existing text in italic font, bolded italic font indicates proposed new text, bolded crossed out sections are existing text that would be eliminated.
Box 3 – Bylaw 1789, Section 5.5 Permit Fees
5.5 Sign Permit fee per sign: are outlined below. Additional administrative fees apply to signs, which as per Section 10.0 of this bylaw, require a highway license of occupation, a license of occupation and/or an encroachment agreement.
SIGN TYPE FEE PER SIGN Balloon Sign, Banner Sign, Canopy Sign, $25.00 Fascia Sign, Hanging Sign Freestanding Sign, Projecting Sign, $50.00 Sandwich Board, Hanging Sign
Town of Smithers Tree Sign $150.00
4) Amend Bylaw 1789, Sec. 8.3 Banner Signs
Bylaw 1789 only allows the display of banner signs for 30 days per year. The proposed amendment would allow businesses to have an annual banner display time of 90 days provided no one banner is displayed for longer than 30 consecutive days.
Box 5 shows the bylaw’s existing text in italic font, bolded italic font indicates proposed new text, bolded crossed out sections are existing text that would be eliminated.
Box 5 - Bylaw 1789, Section 8.3 Banner Signs
8.3 Temporary banner signs are permitted only in commercial, industrial and public use zones, subject to the following regulations:
a) Maximum area of 10 m2 (107 ft2); b) installed for a maximum of 30 consecutive days per calendar year, with a maximum banner sign display time per business of 90 days per year;
c) Attached to its support in such a way as to prevent flapping.
3
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 57 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
Attachment 2 to Report DEV 17-043 Council meeting: Nov 28, 2017
5) Amend Bylaw 1789, Sec. 8.4 Fascia Signs
The amendment would increase the maximum area for a fascia sign from 0.3 m2 per linear meter of business frontage to 0.6 m2. The current maximum area sign of 0.3 m2 per linear meter of frontage is a too low when compared to other jurisdictions in BC:
Terrace - the total sign area for a Fascia sign is limited to 15% of the total wall area on which the sign is located. Kitimat – the total sign area for a Fascia sign shall not exceed 20% of the building face to which sign is attached. Prince George has a maximum sign area of 1.2 m2 per 1 m of building frontage for fascia signs. Fort St. John uses a maximum area of 1 m2 per linear meter for fascia signs. City of Vancouver uses a 0.6 m2 per 1 linear meter of frontage. City of Vernon uses 1 m2 per linear meter of frontage up to a maximum of 14 m2.
For instance a small storefrontson Main Street is often only 5 to 6 metres in length. Hence, the maximum area for a fascia sign would only be 1.5 m2 to 1.8 m2.
Box 6 - Bylaw 1789, Section 8.4 Fascia Signs
8.4 Fascia signs are permitted in all zones, subject to the following regulations:
a) Maximum area of 0.3 0.6 m2 per 1 m (1 ft2 per 1') of building frontage; b) Not extend above the top of the roof line or beyond the side of a building;
c) May encroach over a road right-of-way only in accordance with Section 10 of this bylaw.
4
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 58 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
Attachment 2 to Report DEV 17-043 Council meeting: Nov 28, 2017
6) Amend Bylaw 1789, Sec. 8.8 Sandwich Board Signs
The amendment would clarify the number of sandwich board signs permitted to mobile vendors and clarify that the display time and requirement to comply with Section 10 “Signs on or Over a Road Right-of-Way” of bylaw also applies to businesses located outside the downtown area.
Box 7 shows the bylaw’s existing text in italic font, bolded italic font indicates proposed new text, bolded crossed out sections are existing text that would be eliminated.
Box 7 - Bylaw 1789, Section 8.8 Sandwich Board Signs
8.8 Sandwich Board Signs are permitted in commercial, industrial and public use zones, subject to the following regulations:
a) Maximum size of 0.6 m (2') horizontal by 1.2 m (4') vertical and shall be stable;
b) Maximum of two signs per business, per site, are placed along the lot frontage of the business or activity to which the sign pertains, including mobile vendors, and there is a minimum 1.5 m clear unimpeded pedestrian access width maintained.
c) Compliance with regulations contained in this bylaw, including those outlined in Section 10 of this bylaw;
d) Displayed only during operating hours of the business or activity to which the sign pertains;
8.9 Sandwich Board Signs in the C-1, C-1A & C-1B zones are permitted on a pedestrian road right-of-way provided that:
a) Maximum size of 0.6 m (2') horizontal by 1.2 m (4') vertical and shall be stable;
b) Highway License of Occupation Agreement has been entered into in accordance with Section 10 of this bylaw;
c) Displayed only during operating hours of the business or activity to which the sign pertains;
d) Maximum one sign is placed along the frontage of the business or activity to which the sign pertains, including mobile vendors, and there is a minimum 1.5 m clear unimpeded pedestrian access width maintained.
5
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 59 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
Attachment 2 to Report DEV 17-043 Council meeting: Nov 28, 2017
7) Amend Bylaw 1789, Sec. 10.1 Signs on or Over A Road Right-of-Way
The amendment would clarify the minimum distance from a curb line that a horizontal projection must keep. The wording clarification would be consistent with the language used in Schedule B to Bylaw 855, which regulates encroachment limits within the Town of Smithers.
Box 8 shows the bylaw’s existing text in italic font, bolded italic font indicates proposed new text, bolded crossed out sections are existing text that would be eliminated.
Box 8 - Bylaw 1789, Section 10.1 Signs On or Over a Road Right of Way
10.1 The owner of a sign permitted by this bylaw to project or hang over a road right-of-way, including a pedestrian sidewalk, must first submit to the Director the following for approval: a) Enter into an Encroachment Agreement with the Town; b) Drawings showing a minimum vertical clearance of 2.4 m (8') above grade, and; and maximum horizontal projection of 0.6 m (2') from a curb line c) Any horizontal projection on or over a road right of way must not be closer than 0.6 m (2') back from a curb line.
6
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 60 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
Attachment 2 to Report DEV 17-043 Council meeting: Nov 28, 2017
8) Amend Bylaw 1789, Sec. 11.0 Enforcement
The proposed amendment would establish a 15-day compliance timeframe for temporary signs and a 30-day timeframe for permanent signs. This change would allow Staff to apply a consistent compliance timeframe. Box 9 shows the bylaw’s existing text in italic font, bolded italic font indicates proposed new text, bolded crossed out sections are existing text that would be eliminated.
Box 9 - Bylaw 1789, Section 11.0 General Authority for Orders
11.1 lf the Director determines that an owner or occupier of property has not complied with any provision of this bylaw, or a sign permit issued under this bylaw, the Director may, by notice in writing, make an order directing the person to do any of the following:
a) Bring the sign and the property into compliance
b) Discontinue and refrain from proceeding with any work that has been commenced or is in progress;
c) Repair, alter or remove a sign; and may specify in the order a date 30-day timeframe by which the person must remedy the noncompliance of a permanent sign. When involving non-compliant temporary signs, the person/business must remedy the non-compliance within 15 days of having received written notice.
7
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 61 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.1
Attachment 2 to Report DEV 17-043 Council meeting: Nov 28, 2017
9) Amend Bylaw 1789, Sec. 11.14 Reconsideration of an Order
An order to remove, alter, or remove a sign can only be issued when and if a person or business fails to meet the regulations contained in Sign Bylaw 1789. Hence, in order for a reconsideration by Council, a variance to the regulation would be required. Staff recommend Section 11.14 be re-written to clarify that the only official and legal option to vary the Sign Bylaw is through a Development Variance Permit (DVP) process. If a person or applicant feels that the change to the regulation that they are seeking has general application outside their specific case, the applicant and/ or Staff can request Council consider a text amendment to the bylaw. Text amendments are prompted by Staff or Council as part of housekeeping.
Box 10 shows the bylaw’s existing text in italic font, bolded italic font indicates proposed new text, bolded crossed out sections are existing text that would be eliminated Box 10 - Bylaw 1789, Section 11.14 Reconsideration of an Order
11.14 A person who has received an order issued by the Director under this bylaw may seek reconsideration by Council by notifying the Town's Corporate Officer within 5 business days of receiving the notice. The matter may be heard, in person or through written representations, at the next or subsequent regular meeting of Council, or sooner as may be arranged between the person and the Corporate Officer. After the person has had an opportunity to be heard, Council may confirm, vary, modify or cancel the decision of the Director, and may impose any terms, conditions, restrictions or requirements in relation to the matter that are effective as an order under this Bylaw from the date the resolution is made.
11.14 A person who has received an order issued by the Director under this bylaw may seek reconsideration by Council by applying for a Development Variance Permit.
8
SIGN BYLAW PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Page 62 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.2
REPORT TO COUNCIL
DATE: December 4, 2017 REPORT: ADM 17-063
FROM: Dianna Plouffe FILE: 0550-01 Director of Corporate Services
SUBJECT: Deputy Mayor - 2018
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT Council designate a member of Council to be Deputy Mayor for 2018.
DISCUSSION:
As per the Community Charter and Council Procedures Bylaw No. 1766, Council must designate a member of Council to act in place of the Mayor.
Community Charter Designation of member to act in place of mayor Section 130, (a) The council must, in accordance with its applicable procedure bylaw, provide for the designation of a Councillor as the member responsible for acting in the place of the mayor when the mayor is absent or otherwise unable to act or when the office of mayor is vacant.
Council Procedure Bylaw No. 1766 Designation of Member to Act in Place of Mayor – Deputy Mayor Page 12, No. 94 Annually, in December. Council must from amongst its members designate a Councillor to be responsible for acting in the place of the Mayor when the Mayor is absent or otherwise unable to act or when the office of the Mayor is vacant.
CAO Dir/DS Dir/Fin Agen Date: Dec.12, 2017 Dir/CS Dir/WO Bldg Ins In-Cam Date: CAA Fire Planner Agenda Placement: Staff A Dir /Rec Air/Mgr PCSO Other:
DEPUTY MAYOR 2018 Page 63 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.2
Regular Council Page 2 Report: ADM 17-063
Respectfully submitted by: Approved for submission:
Dianna Plouffe Anne Yanciw Director of Corporate Services Chief Administrative Officer
DEPUTY MAYOR 2018 Page 64 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.3
REPORT TO COUNCIL
DATE: December 5, 2017 REPORT: ADM17-061
FROM: Jessica Bagnall FILE: 1855-20 NDIT Intern
SUBJECT: BC Rural Dividend Fund- Active Transportation Plan and Trail Upgrade Project
RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council authorizes the Town of Smithers submission of an application to the BC Rural Dividend Program for an Active Transportation Plan and Trail Upgrade Project in the amount of $100,000; AND THAT Council Support this project through its duration.
BACKGROUND:
The BC Rural Dividend is providing $25 million a year to assist rural communities with a population of 25,000 or less to reinvigorate and diversify their local economies. It was developed to recognize both the contribution rural communities have made to B.C.’s economy, and the unique challenges they face to diversify beyond natural resources. The program will contribute to the strength and sustainability of small rural communities, making them more attractive places to live and work. This grant program specifically encourages projects relating to trail systems/upgrades.
This Active Transportation Plan was identified by Town Council as a strategic priority to encourage and facilitate active transportation, including walking and bicycling, within our community. This could result in the future construction of new, multi-use pathways or improvements to existing Town streets.
In 2014, the staff created an in-house pedestrian plan to guide the development of walkways and pedestrian friendly infrastructure. The proposed plan would further develop this initiative and identify the resources and priorities needed in future active transportation infrastructure projects.
CAO Dir/DS Dir/FIN Agen Date: Dec 12, 2017 Dir/CS Dir/WO Bldg Ins In-Cam Date: CAA Fire Planner Agenda Placement: Staff A Dir /Rec Air/Mgr PCSO Other:
BC RURAL DIVIDEND FUND - ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION & TRAIL UPGRADE Page 65 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.3
Regular Council Page 2 Report: ADM 17-061
DISCUSSION:
This project is intended to developing accessible infrastructure by creating a public Active Transportation Plan with professional recommendations that are intended be adopted into the Official Community Plan. This transportation plan is intended to recommend projects for updating existing infrastructure and/or develop new infrastructure to support active transportation opportunities
In addition to the proposed plan, a percentage of this grant funding could be used for an infrastructure project. The Town intends to use this portion to update the perimeter trail network surrounding Smithers in key areas that have been identified by staff. These include refurbishing eroded trail sections (including replacing culverts) near Riverside Campground, and resurfacing the Willowvale land bridge. In British Columbia, trail networks offer a unique opportunity to provide health and wellness benefits to communities while supporting local rural economic development by increasing tourism. Trail upgrades/development are one of the main criteria under the current BC Rural Dividend grant program.
The links between traditional tourism and outdoor recreation are getting stronger. Communities are recognizing the opportunities associated with recreational trails as a tourism attraction and a driver of economic development. Trails provide opportunities for commercial recreation businesses that contribute to the local economy. Trails have the advantage of boosting economic activity while contributing positive impacts to community, social development, education of citizens, and the environment.
Recently, staff conducted a Citizen Budget Tax simulator exercise for community engagement in the budgeting process. Residents who selected a partial of full increase in tax funding for parks, playgrounds and fields indicated that the perimeter trails were ranked the highest priority this service area.
RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS:
If approved by council, the Town will apply for 2017/2018 fourth intake funding from the BC Rural Dividend Fund. The deadline for submission is December 15, 2017. The proposed budget for this grant project is as follows
• Active Transportation Plan (contracted service including public consultation component) $40,000 • Active Transportation Plan: Communication (including Advertising) $3,500 • Willowvale Land Bridge upgrade $5,000 • Staff Time to coordinate all of the project $4,000 • Perimeter Trail system upgrades (near Riverside Campground) $47,500
The Town must contribute 20% of the $100,000 project budget. This contribution would be a $16,000 financial contribution and a $4,000 In-Kind contribution of staff time, which the Town has within its 2018 budget (The Town budgeted to fund an Active Transportation Plan in 2018 using General Operating surplus). This grant program will provide up to 80% grant funding towards all of these projects items.
BC RURAL DIVIDEND FUND - ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION & TRAIL UPGRADE Page 66 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.3
Regular Council Page 3 Report: ADM 17-061
As grant decisions can take considerable time this project is anticipated to occur in 2019, which falls within the grant timelines.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS:
This project could result in a reduction in the amount of traffic congestion and vehicle dependence, which translates into a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Encouraging pedestrian centered oriented design was identified in the 2012 Community Energy and Greenhouse Emissions Plan. Reducing community-wide greenhouse gas emissions has also been identified in the 2015-2018 Council Strategic Priorities.
ACCESSIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS:
The Age Friendly Assessment and Action Plan for the Town of Smithers submitted by Access Smithers indicated the popularity of the town’s perimeter trail. It was the most frequently used public space with 85% of online survey respondents accessing the trail more than once a year. 25% of these respondents indicate they access the trail weekly or more.
POLICY CONSIDERATIONS:
Encouraging and facilitating active transportation, including walking and bicycling, within our community has been identified in the 2015-2018 Council Strategic Priorities.
The Town of Smithers Official Community Plan indicates goals to provide a range of transportation networks, facilities and modes necessary to support the Town’s economy and environmental efforts. This plan also supports the development of an integrated and connected network of trails and pathways that encourage walking and biking as viable local transportation options.
In addition, the Official Community Plan sets goals to improve connectivity by connecting and expanding the Smithers’ Perimeter Trail system, and to integrate trail connections as part of any transportation infrastructure planning discussions, decisions, or plans.
ALTERNATIVES/OPTIONS:
The Town can choose not to participate in the current Rural Dividend grant program.
Respectfully submitted by: Approved for submission by:
Jessica Bagnall Anne Yanciw NDIT Intern Chief Administrative Officer
BC RURAL DIVIDEND FUND - ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION & TRAIL UPGRADE Page 67 of 239 Page 68 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.4
REPORT TO COUNCIL
DATE: November 29, 2017 FILE: 1610-01
FROM: Leslie Ford, Director of Finance REPORT: FIN 17-052
SUBJECT: Draft of the “Revitalization Taxation Exemption Program”
RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council approve the draft “Revitalization Taxation Exemption Program” so that it can be presented to key stakeholders during the consultation process.
BACKGROUND Council identified the creation of a Small Business Task Force as a corporate priority in its strategic priorities for 2015-2018. Council established the Small Business Task Force in 2016. The Task Force recommended that Town create a Revitalization Tax Exemption Bylaw/Program. Council said they would look at the creation of such a program later in their term. Council reviewed key components of a revitalization exemption program in November 2017.
DISCUSSION: Council approved the following motions at the November 28, 2017 Regular Council meeting:
“That Council directs Staff to create a Revitalization Taxation Exemption program focusing on secondary residential with downtown, with downtown being defined as King Street to Queen Street and Highway 16 to Railway Avenue”. OPPOSED: Councillor Wray CARRIED
“That Council use the remainder of the recommendations contained in Staff Report FIN 17-048 as the foundation for the Town’s Revitalization Taxation Exemption program”. CARRIED
Attached is a draft “Smithers Revitalization Taxation Program” based on Council’s direction and motions. Once this draft program is approved by Council, it will be presented to the key
CAO Dir/DS Dir/FIN Agen Date: December 12, 2017 Dir/CS Dir/WO Bldg Ins In-Cam Date: Admin Asst. Fire Planner Agenda Placement: Staff A Dir /Rec Air/Mgr PCSO Other: COW Mtg
"printed on Rainforest Alliance - FSC certified recycled paper"
DRAFT REVITALIZATION TAXATION EXEMPTION PROGRAM Page 69 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.4
Regular Council Page 2 Report: FIN 17-052
stakeholders (as part of the revitalization taxation exemption program consultation process – see project timeline further in this report). The zoning areas have been more accurately defined than they were in the previous report to Council.
Since the primary criteria is that, to be eligible, any renovations or new construction has to have an auxiliary residential component, the minimum construction values were removed. They are not relevant anymore since they are not the designated eligibility criteria.
Staff also made one addition to the building construction criteria for renovations. What has been added is that 50% of the renovation upgrades has to pertain to renovations to the auxiliary residence dwelling units (or adding new residential dwellings to an existing building). This would eliminate someone coming in to get a building permit for primarily a commercial upgrade and being eligible for the program with small or minor residential dwelling unit changes (i.e. putting in a new door in an upstairs apartment etc). This 50% is discretionary and could result in being changed as the Town moves forward with stakeholder consultation.
RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS: Revitalization taxation exemptions only apply to the municipal tax portion. They relate to the “resulting increase in assessment” that a proponent could see as a result of new, or renovation, construction. An example is as follows:
If a business has construction that results in an increase in $100,000 additional class 6 (business) assessment and an increase of (or new) $100,000 class 1 residential assessment and the term of the revitalization bylaw program is 5 years, a property owner could see the following tax savings: (under current 2017 Class 6 Smithers municipal tax rates): o Annual Class 6 tax savings per $100,000 new assessment value: estimated $1,732 per year (or $8,660 after 5 years). o Annual Class 1 tax savings per $100,000 new assessment value: estimated $486 per year (or $2,430 after 5 years). o Total annual Class 1 and Class 6 tax savings over 5 years under this example: $11,090
POLICY/LEGISLATION IMPLICATIONS: In accordance with Sections 226 and 227 of the Community Charter.
PROJECT TIMELINE: The established timeline for the project is as follows: November 2017: • Council decision on key parts of the revitalization program December 2017: • Council to approve the draft of the “Revitalization Taxation Exemption Program” that can be presented to the key stakeholders
DRAFT REVITALIZATION TAXATION EXEMPTION PROGRAM Page 70 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.4
Regular Council Page 3 Report: FIN 17-052
January/February 2018: • January 2018: advertise the consultation process and contact key stakeholders • February 2018: Council to meet with Key stakeholders: Downtown Merchants and local construction industry representatives (COW meeting tentatively scheduled for February 20th, 2018) March/April 2018: • Town’s Municipal Lawyer will draft the actual bylaw from the program details to ensure its legality (the bylaw will include an application form and project completion tax certificate form). • Draft bylaw will then be sent to BC Assessment for their legal team to review and make sure they approve that it could be administered through their legislation. April 2018: • The Town’s 2018-2022 Financial Plan will include required information about the Town’s Revitalization Taxation Exemption objectives (as per Section 226 (6) (b) and 165 (3) (1)) of the Community Charter) and this consideration will be noted in the Final version of the Revitalization Taxation Exemption Bylaw.
May 2018: • The revitalization taxation exemption bylaw will be advertised for 2 weeks in accordance with Sections 227 and 94 of the Community Charter (before the bylaw is adopted). • The Bylaw will be communicated to the public/business community.
COMMUNICATION: The Town will communicate a draft program to key stakeholders before the actual bylaw is prepared; to the public before adoption of the bylaw (advertise in the paper) and to key stakeholders again once the bylaw is adopted.
ATTACHMENTS: • Draft of the “Revitalization Taxation Exemption Program”
Respectfully submitted: Approved as submitted:
______Leslie Ford Anne Yanciw Director of Finance Chief Administrative Officer
p:\reports\2017\report 52\report fin #052 draft revitalization taxation exemption program.doc
DRAFT REVITALIZATION TAXATION EXEMPTION PROGRAM Page 71 of 239 Page 72 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.4
REVITALIZATION TAXATION EXEMPTION PROGRAM
OVERALL OBJECTIVES OF THE PROGRAM:
The Town’s Official Community Plan (OCP) (Section 5.3.3 - Downtown) recommends concentrating new residential uses within the Downtown area in order to reinforce the Downtown as the heart of the community. It also recommends supporting continued Downtown revitalization as well as creating a compact and complete Downtown.
Policy 1 of the OCP states that the Downtown is the preferred location for mixed-use commercial/residential buildings.
The Objectives of the proposed Smithers Revitalization Taxation Exemption program are: • To add “Efficient Growth” to the Smithers tax base; • To diversity options for housing stock; • To contribute to the success and vibrancy of the Downtown core; and • To reduce GHG emissions by making a more walkable community with a less energy intensive lifestyle.
The program will accomplish those objectives by: • Encouraging the revitalization of Downtown Smithers through increased mixed- use development in the Downtown Core; • Increasing the opportunity for more people to live in the Downtown core; • Encouraging the densification of the Downtown core; and • Increasing the stock of apartments in the Town.
DESIGNATED EXEMPTION AREA: The Revitalization Taxation Exemption area will be limited to the Downtown core, defined as the area between King and Queen Street and between Railway Avenue and Highway 16.
1
DRAFT REVITALIZATION TAXATION EXEMPTION PROGRAM Page 73 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.4
EXEMPTION CRITERIA: The following criteria will have to be met in order to apply for a Smithers Revitalization Taxation Exemption:
LAND USE REQUIREMENT • The project’s intended commercial and mixed-use land use(s) must be permitted in the C1, C-1A and C-1B zones.
PROJECT TYPES ACCEPTED • The project can either be a Renovation of an existing Commercial Building (or existing mixed use Commercial/Residential building) or Construction of a new Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Building
DENSITY • Renovation projects will only be able to apply if the project includes renovations to existing residential dwelling units (without reducing the density), or includes the addition of at least one new residential dwelling unit to the building.
• New construction projects will only be able to apply if the project includes at least one residential dwelling.
QUALIFYING IMPROVEMENTS • At least 50% of a renovation value to an existing building must be related to residential dwelling renovations, upgrades and/or additions. • New construction projects must include an approved residential dwelling component.
EXTENT OF THE EXEMPTION: The following taxation exemptions for each type of investment will be approved: • Renovations to an existing building – Qualifies for an exemption of 100% of the increase in the assessed value of resulting Class 6 and/or Class 1 Building Improvement assessments, over the previous year. • New Construction – Qualifies for an exemption of 100% of the assessed value of the resulting new Class 6 and Class 1 Building Improvement assessments. LENGTH OF THE EXEMPTION: The revitalization taxation exemption term will be for 5 years, with no decline in benefit; and a proponent can only apply once per project.
2
DRAFT REVITALIZATION TAXATION EXEMPTION PROGRAM Page 74 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.5
REPORT TO COUNCIL
DATE: November 30, 2017 FILE: 1610-01
FROM: Leslie Ford, Director of Finance REPORT: FIN 17-53
SUBJECT: Library Board Member Appointment
RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council approves the re-appointment of John Buikema to the Smithers Public Library Board for a 2 year term commencing January 1, 2018 and ending December 31, 2019.
DISCUSSION: John Buikema was appointed to the Board by Council last December 2016, for a one-year term starting January 1st, 2017. Unfortunately he was missed off of the list that came forward to Council at the November 14th Regular Council meeting and was therefore not part of the past motions concerning re-appointments.
John has submitted his application and is requesting to be re-appointed to the Board. The above noted recommended is that he be re-appointed for a new 2 year term, starting January 1, 2018.
RESOURCES: Library Board members are 100% volunteers. They do not receive a stipend.
LEGISLATION/POLICY: The Library Board oversees the operations of the Library, in accordance with the Library Act.
ATTACHMENTS: • Listing of the Library Board Members as of December 2017 • Application from John Buikema
Respectfully submitted: Approved as submitted:
Leslie Ford Anne Yanciw Director of Finance Chief Administrative Officer
CAO Dir/DS Dir/FIN Agen Date: Dec 12/17 Dir/CS Dir/WO Bldg Ins Regular Admin Asst. Fire Planner Agenda Placement: Staff A Dir /Rec Air/Mgr PCSO Other:
LIBRARY BOARD APPOINTMENT Page 75 of 239 Page 76 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.5
Smithers Public Library Board As of December 2017
Gurrent Library Date originally Current Term Gurrent (or newly Has asked Board Members Appointed to Start date (or approved) To be Appointed by the Board newly approved Term Reappointed Council reappointment) To expire For another term
Kay MacKenzie November 2015 January 1,2018 December 31, 2019 Already re-appointed
Paul Parry October 2016 January 1,2018 December 31,2019 Already re-appointed
Lisa Feinberg November 2017 Nov 14, 2017 December 31, 2019 Newly appointed
Bruce Hutchinson December 2013 January 1,2018 December 31,2018 Already re-appointed
Wally Bergen (Chair) December 2014 January 1,2017 December 31,2018
Lorraine Doiron January 2015 January 1,2017 December 31,2018
John Buikema January 2017 January 1,2017 December 31,2017 Yes***
Frank Wray, December 2014 December 2014 Councillor
*** recommending re- appointment for new 2 year term ending December 31,2019
LIBRARY BOARD APPOINTMENT Page 77 of 239 Page 78 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.5
lñ rFz\l-nn rr- r-\
Sffifithe smithers ... simply exceptional. Vfr rtbraryiffiSå,% Library Board Member Application
Applications can be submitted in person to the Town of Smithers, 1027 Aldous Street, Smithers Attention: Anne Yanciw, Chief Administrative Officer.
Please Note: To be eligible as a Library Board Member you must either reside within the Town municipal boundaries or in the rural ElectoralArea "A" Fire Protection/Recreation & Cultural Benefitting Service Area.
CANDIDATES INFORMATION
Name: J o ì^,- ø ,^, k-e *'o
Civic Address:
Address ßo" (Mailing) (Street) City 5r-,: t"l^øS Province: B C PostalCode Vo: å t..lo
Home Phone:1zso) Work Phone:(2s0, Oell qzso)
Fax No: (250) EmailAddress:
Reason for Seeking Appointment
AI Þr LLo*^" bo^t'à,. 5 ce Þ- n fÇ-a o; 'rf ¡*e^t
Special Background or Expertise
Pnaç', Þ.-t5 cA aú\;l-nc;- o^. L; Ara.rq ßo""J . U ll a.rc L^,Je¡þ¿ d.å q. lla¿c t ¿t¿ r¡;Àc ú*,1 of rSsl -.,.', + History of Community lnvolvement (Past & Present) V., o^, t ê' F{ou J ,-.$ I p:\my docum ents\library\committee application form - library lre ner p0$g Roe Ouerd, t-l ArMgr H fl 0lhor; LIBRARY BOARD APPOINTMENT Page 79 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.5 lf space is insuffibient, please attach a separate sfieet Please complete and sign "page 2" of the Application -Page 2- Additional Information f r¿-a-tl^,r .e-..-ì,¡.<¿Å rrz,-1 ^Sa"t qc¿x-L oF sa.-¡; .- a l) t\ .t \) U J 4't L br¿.r -n 6 o ard, o' I J ^."À -I [¡nl ,* nlrr.'- ^rt ; ^ *L¿ .^z-rr-fa J't- (,o ra-€ ) * *{- êpoloqiag ßr s¿*chl^.a i,-- *1,,¡s .J \) ^*t \) ;li-îa^l: -*-[.- '.-n {^J t-o"- .,l.+ .L vvtJttufLtlf\^(,Nttv- - -l ¿ ^d.^ tJruu¡;u . t ft) r\^-r dtr +I. J "*4<-r-'hc,,n, Declaration and Consent of the Applicant I solemnly declare that I am eligible to be appointed to the Library Board and am not an elected official, officer or employee of the Town of Smithers or the Smithers Public Library. ño*¡" Z?TL zot] Signaìíre of Applicant ,"rt Jok ^ ß,.^. Ve^,=a- Name of Applicant (Please Print) For more information please contact the Town Office a|250-847-1600 or the Smithers Public Library al 250-847 -3043. p:\my documents\library\committee applicat¡on form - library board nov 20l6.doc LIBRARY BOARD APPOINTMENT Page 80 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.6 REPORT TO COUNCIL DATE: December 5, 2017 FILE: 1610-01 FROM: Leslie Ford, Director of Finance REPORT: FIN 17-54 SUBJECT: Revised January/February 2018 Budget Meeting Schedule RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council approve the Revised 2018 Budget meeting schedule. BACKGROUND At the October 10th Regular Council meeting Council approved the following dates as the scheduled 2018 January/February budget meetings: Tuesday January 16th (8:30 am to 12:30 pm) Tuesday January 30th (8:30 am to 12:30 pm) Tuesday February 6th (8:30 am to 12:30 pm) Tuesday February 20th (8:30 am to 12:30 pm) 7.1.4 2018 BUDGET MEETING DATES Report FIN 17-43 dated September 20, 2017, from L. Ford, Director of Finance, recommending approval of the proposed 2018 Budget meeting date schedule, was presented (1610-01). R17.409 Browne/Wray THAT Council changes the meeting time for the daytime meetings listed in the proposed Draft 2018 Budget Timeline from the afternoon (12:30 p.m. to 4.30 p.m.) to the morning (8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.). CARRIED. R17.410 Wray/Brown THAT Council approves the 2018 Budget meeting date schedule. CARRIED. CAO Dir/DS Dir/FIN Agen Date: Dec 12/17 Dir/CS Dir/WO Bldg Ins In-Cam Date: Admin Asst. Fire Planner Agenda Placement: Staff A Dir /Rec Air/Mgr PCSO Other: "printed on Rainforest Alliance - FSC certified recycled paper" 2018 BUDGET MEETING SCHEDULE Page 81 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.6 Regular Council Page 2 Report: FIN 17-54 DISCUSSION: A councillor will miss 2 of the currently scheduled budget meetings (January 30th and February 6th). Staff was asked to look at different budget meeting dates to see if the 2 budget dates they are away could be changed so that all of Council could be in attendance at the budget meetings. Staff looked at the schedules (Council's as well as Town staff), conferred with others who may have scheduled around the original dates; and found 2 other possible dates that the dates in question could be changed to. The Proposed new 2018 January/February Budget meeting schedule is: Capital & Special Operating Projects: • Monday January 15th (8:30 am to 12:30 pm) (to replace the January 30th meeting) • Tuesday January 16th (8:30 am to 12:30 pm) Operating Budgets: • Friday February 16th (8:30 am to 12:30 pm) (to replace the February 6th meeting) • Tuesday February 20th (8:30 am to 12:30 pm) POLICY/ LEGISLATION IMPLICATIONS: The final 2018 –2022 Financial Plan (Capital and Operating) must be adopted by bylaw by May 15th, 2018 to be in accordance with the Community Charter Legislation. PROCESS: Draft 2018-2022 capital budget information will be provided to Council by early January 2018 and draft 2018 operating budget information will be provided to Council by the mid January 2018. All Finance Committee information is placed onto CivicWeb for the public to see; and these meetings are open to the public. ATTACHMENT: Revised 2018 Budget Timeline. ALTERNATIVES: Keep the original Schedule as approved in October. Respectfully submitted: Approved For Submission: ______Leslie Ford, Anne Yanciw Director of Finance Chief Administrative Officer 2018 BUDGET MEETING SCHEDULE Page 82 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.6 REVISED 2018 Budget Timeline Budget Topic/Process Type of Meeting/other deadlines Times A Internal Staff Meetings/Budget Prep Discussions of Draft Capital and September/October 2017 Operating Budgets Draft 2018-2022 Financial Plan put November 2017 together Reports to CAO and then assembled early to mid December 2017 Draft 2018-2022 Financial Plan information package(s) to Council: Capital Budgets By end of December 2017 Operating Budgets By mid January 2018 B Citizen Budget Website Presentation to Council about the website: TUESDAY OCTOBER 10, 2017 A t t h e R e g u l a r C o u n c i l M t g Citizen Budget website open to the Public: WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 11TH TO SUNDAY NOVEMBER 12TH, 2017 C Funding requests from other Organizations: TUESDAY DECEMBER 5TH, 2017 C.O.W meeting 6:30 pm – 8:30pm 1 2018 BUDGET MEETING SCHEDULE Page 83 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.1.6 D 2018 Capital and Operating Budget Meetings • MONDAY JANUARY 15, 2018 F i n a n c e Committee meeting 8:30 am to 12:30 pm 2018-2022 Capital Plan and 2018 Special Operating Projects • TUESDAY JANUARY 16, 2018 F i n a n c e C o m m i t t e e m e e t in g 8:30 am to 12:30 pm 2018-2022 Capital Plan and 2018 Special Operating Projects • FRIDAY FEBRUARY 16, 2018 Finance Committee meeting 8:30 am to 12:30 pm Operating Budgets • TUESDAY FEBRUARY 20, 2018 F i n a n c e C o m m ittee meeting 8:30 am to 12:30 pm Operating Budgets E 2018 Municipal Property Tax Rates Tax Rate Information package to by March 30th, 2018 Council Meeting About Tax Rate Setting: TUESDAY APRIL 3, 2018 Finance Committee meeting 6:30 pm - 8:30 pm F Finalized 2018 –2022 Financial Plan Information Session on the Draft 2018-2022 Plan presented to the Public: Finance Committee Meeting 5:30 pm – 6:30 pm TUESDAY APRIL 10, 2018 before a Regular Council meeting G Financial Plan and Tax Rate Bylaws Prepare finalized 2018-2022 Financial Plan and 2018 Tax rate Bylaws (including Schedules) 3 readings and then adoption: April 27thth, 2018 & May 8th, 2018 Regular Council meetings 2 2018 BUDGET MEETING SCHEDULE Page 84 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.2.1 REPORT TO COUNCIL DATE: November 28, 2018 FILE: 1610-01 FROM: Leslie Ford, Director of Finance REPORT: FIN 17-51 SUBJECT: Citizen Budget Results RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council receives this report for information. BACKGROUND: At the July 11th, 2017 Regular Council meeting Council selected the Citizen Budget - Tax Module to present to the public in the fall as a new and different type of “budget public consultation” process. The Citizen Budget Tax Module was made available to the public from October 10th, 2017 to November 12, 2017. DISCUSSION: Attached is a results document prepared by OpenNorth, who created the Town’s Citizen Budget website. 65 people completed the Citizen Budget questions. The line shown on each graph is the “median” which means that if the line is along the 100% column (usually the dark column) that means the average number of respondents selected to keep the services as is (no change). If the line is showing to the right of the 100% column that means that more people responded that they would be willing to pay more taxes for that particular level of service. Contrary to that, if the line was to the left of the 100% column that means more respondents wished to pay less taxes for that particular service. • There were a higher percentage of people who said to keep the same level of service, or increase, Roads and Streets Operations CAO Dir/DS Dir/FIN Agen Date: Dec 12/17 Dir/CS Dir/WO Bldg Ins In-Cam Date: Admin Asst. Fire Planner Agenda Placement: Staff B Dir /Rec Air/Mgr PCSO Other: "printed on Rainforest Alliance - FSC certified recycled paper" CITIZEN BUDGET RESULTS Page 85 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.2.1 Regular Council Page 2 Report: FIN 17-51 . For those that stated they wished to see Roads and Street Operations increase: the largest response was to increase pothole patching. . For those that stated they wished to see Roads and Street Operations reduced, they were fairly even about what to reduce: line painting, sanding and street lighting. • The majority of the respondents stated that they wished to see an increase in funding for Roads and Sidewalks (Capital Upgrades). This area had the highest response in terms of people saying they would be willing to pay more taxes for this than any other service within this exercise. • The majority of the respondents stated that they would like to see Bylaw Enforcement/Animal Control services remain as is, or slightly decrease. • The majority of the respondents stated that they would like to see Fire Protection and RCMP Services levels remain as is. • The average response concerning Parks/Playgrounds and Fields was to keep service levels as is. . When asked if they selected a partial or full increase in Parks/Playgrounds or Fields service levels, the top areas selected to increase were: Perimeter Trails and Central Park. . For those who selected to decrease Parks/Playgrounds and Fields service levels, the top areas selected to reduce were Bovill Square, Chandler Park Fields and Goat Park. • The majority of the respondents stated that they would like to see Arena services remain as is, or decrease. • The average response concerning Cultural Organizations was to keep service levels as is. . When asked if they selected a partial or full increase in funding to Cultural Organizations, the most votes went to increase the Library funding. . For those that selected to decrease funding to Cultural Organizations, the most votes went to reduce funding to the Art Gallery and the BV Arts Council. • The average response concerning Recreation Programs was to keep service levels as is • The majority of the respondents stated that they would like to see Economic Development services remain as is, or slightly increase. • The average response concerning Tourism was to keep service levels as is. • The majority of the respondents stated that they would like to see Transit Services remain as is, or decrease. • The average response concerning Cemetery Services was to keep service levels as is. CITIZEN BUDGET RESULTS Page 86 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.2.1 Regular Council Page 3 Report: FIN 17-51 As for the Additional Questions: • The majority of the people said Yes to having “Complete Streets”. • The majority of the people said No to curbside composting if it increased taxes. • The comments in regards to which service people would want to see eliminated are shown in the column next to the General Comments. The majority of people who responded said they were residential property owners and paid Smithers taxes. Overall a better “turnout” than the annual budget information session but this was the first time used. It is recommended that a different Citizen Budget module be used in a future year, such as the Balanced Budgeting Module, to provide different types of information to the public and to ask for different decisions from the public. COMMUNICATION: The Smithers Citizen Budget website was communicated to the public in the following manner: a) Finalized Citizen Budget website was presented at a Regular Council meeting October 10th; b) Media Release was distributed Wednesday October 11th (and sent out to Mayor and Council to include on their Facebook pages); c) Advertised 3 times in the Interior News; d) Put the media release and poster on the Town’s Recreation Facebook page (plus did advertising through Facebook); e) Had the Chamber of Commerce include information within their monthly email blast; f) Went to a Seniors lunch and handed out the posters and told the Seniors about Citizen Budget; g) Had posters available for the public to pick up at the “Let’s Talk” session on October 19th, 2017; and h) Made a computer available to the public to access this website (located in the Town Office’s front lobby). ATTACHMENT: • Citizen Budget Results – prepared by OpenNorth Respectfully submitted: Approved For Submission: ______Leslie Ford, Anne Yanciw Director of Finance Chief Administrative Officer p:\reports\2017\2017 report #51 citizen budget results.doc CITIZEN BUDGET RESULTS Page 87 of 239 Page 88 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.2.1 CITIZEN BUDGET RESULTS Town of Smithers, British Columbia November l6th, 2017 åF OpenNorth CITIZEN BUDGET RESULTS Page 89 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.2.1 Online Budget Consultation Report For the period Octoberl0 to November 12,2017 Pßpüed by OWn Nonh Íor:Towa ol Sml?heß 0Ð llmlnnos Responsee Mcdlan tlme to complele Responses per Day 20 15 10 5 0 Oct 15 od.22 Oc{ 29 Nov 5 Total Number Visitors: 516 tm 160 l/lo t¡0 1S -tff¡l0rN û0 -Plgwlexx 6û Æ lft Oct l5 Oct lt Oct 2t Itlov 5 CITIZEN BUDGET RESULTS Page 90 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.2.1 Web Traffic Sources ltß l?t r {ilrect} I {noncl . m.f¡cobook"com / r*ferrrl ¡ f¡c¡bosh"com ¡l r¡tcrrrl r smhltrr¡.c¡ / rufrrnl lcfrhw.com / rcforrrl . lnt¡rlor-nswr,co'm / nûenel * l.f¡crboohcom / rfrr¡¡l r goo¡h / or¡rrnlc lm.f¡crboo'kcom / ruúrrml " bln¡ I on¡nlc Questions Roads and Sidewalks Would you choose lo increase, decrease or maintain current levels of {unding for Roads and Streets (Operâtions)? Ic o 30% õc èô o 26% Õ 8, 20g. .sc o e 11 o À 1570 I 7 1 0"/o 5 4 5"/o oE 105% 'll l1 CITIZEN BUDGET RESULTS Page 91 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.2.1 lf you selected a part¡al or full lncrease in tax funding for Roads and Streets (Operations) please select the roads and streets operating service{s) that you would like to see ¡ncreased: 32 É @ Ëc ao/o *o E 7Aê/o o o6 60"Á d po 50/o o a 4Õ/o 300/" 10 I 200/. (t 10/o ? ú/o Snôw r6môvâl Sandlng Dust côntrol H¡ghwây'16 Downtown Ma¡n Potholê pâtêh¡ng boulevard Slrs€t ma¡nlenance mâint€nmæ lf you selected a partial or full decrease in tax lund¡ng for Roads and Streets (Operations) please select the roads and streets annual operat¡ng serv¡ce(s) that you would l¡ke to see decreased: to 10 E 35./o I c* 309/" 7 26?" 6 6 2æ/o È 150/o 3 1æ/" 2 5"/o æ/" Snow rsmoval Sånding Duôt æntrol Hlghway l6 L¡ne paint¡ng Downtown SÍe€t boulovard Ma¡n Sl.êêt patching lmprovãmenls mâ¡nlênâñce meinlênâñcê Would you choose to increase, decrease or ma¡ntain current levels of fund¡ng for Roads and Sidewalks (Capital Upgrades)? c o 22"/0 14 Þc e 2t/o 18'/o 16% o 10 c 14./a 0 & 100/o 86/. 5 4 8è/. 4ô/o 2 20/. oqõ 80./. 85ô/. 90v. 960/o 1006/" 110V" 1 1 5./. 120/. CITIZEN BUDGET RESULTS Page 92 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.2.1 lf you selected a partial or full ¡ilcrease in lax funding for Roads and Sldewalks {Capital upgrades) please select the Roads and Streets Capital. Upgrades that you would like to seê increased: e 86?6. ð 6û36 * ã696, e ä s096 @ 4ûfû t* s b 61896 Á- 80s6 ea9ô 8016 sI% s9ô lf you selêeted a partial or full decrease in tax funding for Roads and Sldewafks (Capital upgrades) plêá6ê .select the Roads and Streets Cap¡tal Upgrades that you would l¡ke to see decreased: !, E Ë õ ã0i6 46% tI Tå I g0% E û- 15% rgÞ6 s% RÊ'pevlng.xtðtlng NÊr¡¡pwerûsntdn noplËalne sbÈ6te unþtr 6{t r6cffins dürcg€d ôldt$rtll{s CITIZEN BUDGET RESULTS Page 93 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.2.1 Protective Services Would you choose to increase, decrease or maintain current levels of funding for Fire Protection? q o 550/o Ëc oô 5Aõ/o o 456/o 40/. ou ß c 35ô/o t oË 30o/o o- 25/o 200/0 150/o I 10ô/a 5 4 5o1o 2 ooto 80% 85% 9OYo 95"/o 105% 11ú/o 115"/o 120"/o Would you choose to ¡ncrease, decrease or ma¡ntain current levels of funding for Bylaw EnforcemenUArr¡mal Control? ø c 4fflo o !c o 350/o o Ë 30% o ó 25A" oð Ào w/o 10 150/o 1æt A J 5 5 5% OTo '100o/o 80% 85% 90% 95o/o 105% 114ö/" 1150Á 120a/o Would you choose to increase, decrease or ma¡nta¡n current levels of fund¡ng for Police Services? c o 55o/o ç ô0 506/0 o 45ê/o 40"/" Ðo ¡{ c 350/o o 30% (Lo 25/" 20./o '150/ø 7 1Oo/o â 4 Só/o o10 80% 85o/o 907o 95to 100"/. 105% 110% 11 5ôlo 1206/o CITIZEN BUDGET RESULTS Page 94 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.2.1 Recreation and Culture Would you choose to increase, decrease or maintâin current levels of funding for ParkslPlaygrounds/Fields? ø 40v, c oo c 35"/o 8" oø 30% il & d c I Lo 2O1o 10 15% 1gvo A 4 5õ/o 3 80% 857ô 9ú/" sao/6 105% 1106/o "t15% 12Ùolo lf you selected a partial or full ,ncrease in tax funding for Parks, Playgrounds and Fields please se¡ect the parks, playgrounds andlor field areas that you would like to see have increased service levels: 1B t7 16 t4 12 10 10 I 7 7 6 6 5 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 z 2 11 0 0 0 0 L Aaú! Çú'Cc x CITIZEN BUDGET RESULTS Page 95 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.2.1 lf you selected a partial o¡ full decrease ¡n tax funding for Parks, Playgrounds and Fields please select the parks and/or field areas that you would like to see have decreased service levels: 16 15 l2 IZ 11 10 I 7 7 6 6 55 5 44 4 + 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 0 P Þ ! g ! ..i4 4 4 ìÉ ñ 4k'ñEE:=Elkg ! t > î Y ø t ! d E .: - .9 - ri: À õ L L f > q ¿ á rr 6 =dv- = L vL ó ¡ . - cf gõ = !¡ uu :^o 6 3'sl!@õI *ð Þ *ì þ s âã E b Få i Ë72 H Ë E . o€ I Ë i" Ë Ë 5"= f; E å Ë Ë î E+ î rï iñ iü iE S * õ Æ Èþ : iE 3 f s å -.= ?d ðsiÍÈ:F='äig*";gËi- - +ãl¡Ê€Pt=¿vo¿ú!,^Ì2-a Æ * o Ãi8ô?.rõ * s g # Ê 4 =ar¿ÈE'Jì ÉG à ùÊoe Would you choose to increase, decrease or mainta¡n current levels of funding for Arenas? c o ç 400/0 ôo o6 35% o o 30% ñ g o 260/o e ü o- 2O6/o t1 0 156/a 10% a 5"/" 3 3 Oõ/" 80% 850/o sw" 100% 105% 110% 115% 1206/6 CITIZEN BUDGET RESULTS Page 96 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.2.1 Would you choose to incrêâsê, decrease or maintain current levels of funding for Cultural Organizations? o E 309o .g Ë u È 2û{o Ë oE ô ô- 15% 10% 6% lf you selected a partial or full ¡ttcrea€e in tax funding for Cultural Organizations please select the Organization (or Organlzations) that you would like to see have inereased funding: ø Ê 6096. .8 7UË ã o 00% & E F{!6 I b E. M gûrÉ eg96. 'ttfi; o% 8rnlhere Fubllc 8rÌ.lilhsrs,fuü BV€omrnurillry gV Þllatoülcal ¡r¡d LlÞrary Gdk$ry Asðdohüerr AdÈCflnc¡l Mu¡c¡¡rçr Soclq[y CITIZEN BUDGET RESULTS Page 97 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.2.1 lf you selected a partial or full decrease ¡n tax funding for Cultural Organizat¡ons please sêlect the Organization (or Organlzations) that you would like to see have decrêased funding: ç, dl E 7n?6 F 609É' o s 6fI% .0 Ê I ¡[o!6 tt a- so9Ë' æ% t0j6, 09å. &milhsa ftúlþ *mühüreftt 8l{ûonmunl[y gVÞlkls$ea¡end Llürary Gellery¡¡sorhflot År!s. CounçË ù¡iuppum 8odrly Would you choose to incrêasê, decrease or mainta¡n cur¡ent levels of funding for Recreation Programs? ø Ë Ë ü b å gb ssf6 ð o. Ma 15% 10qô 1 t% Wo 86% #/ø 0SYo 105% 1t0% CITIZEN BUDGET RESULTS Page 98 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.2.1 Economic Development and Tourism Would you ehoose to increase, decrease or ¡naintain current levels of funding for Economic Development? 55"/o c o ac 50/o o È 456/r ö 40â/o oÐ d 35/o c o 300/0 o â- 25"/o 200/o 11 15ø/o 7 10ê/o 3 3 5/o 2 2 oo/o 806/0 86"/0 900/" 95% 145/" 1 10?o 11570 120% Would you choose to increase, decrease or maintâ¡n current levels of funding for Tourism? oC c 8. ü o 406/o oqt d 350/o ç o e 3O/o o o 2Aïo 20c/o 10 15è1o 't0% 3 3 â 5/o 2 O"/o 801o 90% sÛo/" 100% 105% 11æ/o 115,/o 120à/i Transit Services Would you choose to increase, decrease or mainta¡n current levels of funding for Transit Services? c o qvo ! Ê 8. 350/o o o 30"/o Þo d c 25lo o 15 e o L 20vo '160/o 100/, 5 4 3 56/0 2 00/o 80% 850/. 90% 95o/o 'tooto 't05% 110% 116/o 12O"/o CITIZEN BUDGET RESULTS Page 99 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.2.1 Cemetery Seruices Would you choose to incrèase,. decrease or maintâin current lwels of funding for Cemetery Services? fl)Yo M 30% ñ.û 10% 096 æ96 t6% s6% 1{þ% 106% Ît096 11.S% lz0ïo Additional Questions Complete Streets Curbs¡de Composting 6 ø Ê 4 b { 1l 60% ã å E g E 6ffi f å åÊ 5 Õ ß% I o b o.t o. 3096 ?lJlL 10% Yt, i¡o Yês No CITIZEN BUDGET RESULTS Page 100 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.2.1 Tell Us About Yourself Age Ø Ê € E g f Ë ot p ð o- 4ö/. 2% o% g€hd e$optlon ttìder 10 1&2¡l t$'ô4 6õotolder PleasE check all that apply: û t E p* Ë $ ðË o- I ar å lblvn oÍ I am å Tonn ot I i3ddo 0{¡t0ldâ ldo leríe o¡ lem of I do not pdy $nlherð Smllhor3 lbtuû of åtlhls SmAlìðrð Toçlnof ro8ftþñüål fssldolìthtlEnâÍ¡t smlthcru conmter6ltl pfop,aflyt¡reg 8n¡t$en propeÌtyom¡or bound¡rleo prcpeñy orvner tðnerìt propoily te¡(ô8 CITIZEN BUDGET RESULTS Page 101 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.2.1 att = O,P o _o .v¿ u, J ÈC-^r (It o) o .= ul o -Êo (,)i :hoPo ah Ëe Gg c eg*E þE(E-c Et E dP üS eË€ .o ^L =: E t-V ã¿. .tl g3 >0r o J- o) o¡'õ att äe .tt) o 0).! * o U'C ?> c- a o${r7 E sËå ã Êo .c oGLLd\L x(5 o o.r çE : (It L o_c _O- O (t çØ E VLYL LL F,^(ú€r E q', FØ Oø o¡ 6) E È! ,(E-' ()Eoo -'= V.! -cf E õ v 9 .^- lrÞE - o -=^-> 1f, Xc* .c i! ge þ põ lh iÅa å EË $ c r ãili oc or Þ E:e (õE o U'- o å8_s P'õ t E.9 o L0)otr C äør.c PE E9 F .o Ë.E oÈ o¡EE JÊF E F x.9€ Oc :E€:þE P o -\ù - - a!, !L o t !l gl s .9rc: õ Ë.='t g Ë orp õr.= o L.-!^ (l).ll E_o o9 =I -: r 'Fo >à O.= c) à:q,P P ; g;6#E :(! 9õ èãe 9ci ÊE--ï d) rt ÈL o-.9 EËa rld'ìo : q q Eø àc or o, á5 = EË I !- Ë.> 9b Ès Þ ËE tr ;g -H(EØ Ëc tr > o.!¿ t! .F-o- ÞË UP- P;-- g8 = 9:+c.n 14 Ëà u2.Lõ oãE> Þ õrEs Þo.98 oo JOo_ Øl raÞ s€* g =sEËãþdoo.ËE* Ee= o*x t, äE et €E 9 TE EE i; o-È:oìr ã (sä :ào Ho¡ Ë ãÈ c s-Ë9q g oi* È c Jro (u 0- -. oÈ (Eo: o t L 0> ç Ø ì (l)* ä=Eo o-_ ã >,ø, Oe7_=U0)-^U, Ë ã: o.= th .= .Y ¿'u=9? !Q (E E P gF Ë oh E oof c.! cþ! 9gY oi3(! ho o ø, a-O :õ (E'->c àE=8 Ëoa¡ >.= ãËËE F Èo- E.eE OE ä o õ-o 6õ åËËI åË -cl tQa> t! oofE >,s -c, g=b ø-s ho¡õ L_ 3,Ez I * õ' E> oP o õ(/j o o:¿ $-o E åE:.EE Ê Ës¿' b Ë e H;5 o p€ € G-# gii o &Ë b å(, c =E Ee EE fE àg õ Ë E õ5 c) .çì I o 8 úro o c) u) U) ; ã s 9õ È Ë õ oo .t) 1) Þ Pi eËE (l)r- o 5-L 3x -c'#cn Ë H 3õ Þ o- -(uaE# = c ;EEOt¡o oc: -c>úrb fiËiå;¡ !! i ^-= o =O I øE õ l9 ø9 o ;E t-= üt/) L'- 0) :=> :E ¿ oJ b's jo ¡ àc Po¡ ec98õ O_Ø ) -o(Ec o g€ePE th E E8 e8 o o# -Y O ào) eÞb=98 oE de E -c() -Y c7- =3 o¡Eì o.: 'L .c -ls' oo .n o -ç, EÉ Èo, o f F(E lL (¡) f/, àr=oB r- O- .Þì ) : o= -c 'o =;Ë.Ê;= -o ah o E' J f< o (' L ç o C o) o .c L =o at = c (¡) o an t! ._E fL L att Ø '= o õ (g .Y al, ts E () o o ñ o l¡l= :E ) C) L c o) Ê e.9 o an (n L an c) Ct- c an 5 O o o c .= tn o o c E o c c o õ o È9 Ø tu J E z Eð t, m E o o C o) (¡) L tl C tso o o Ë o (U o (' o o tt, ! .c J o E E I C c c) o) f É. LL o oL fL (Jo CITIZEN BUDGET RESULTS Page 102 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.2.1 o (¡) U'- o G U' - €o c I c) ll)eL E c) Eb (l) , ,. 0) O-:--õ áì () .DE c - 0) cFõ9 C. J ! F5 L c) =.n o =at, o o o L 8sÈ= ø E ào 9E+õ at, E8 åË:Ë Ë E o) À F(ús- o- ì c) 6rJ ä 0) o-_ b u, c E î o .> (ElJ .c f à 3 : E ì ñ Eþ 2 a.ø o o o =U' OJ U' o o E fr83 o õ o q) o-^ tE oÊ 3€5 E o c q) 0) E9 H ãE c) -o oË - (f, o .jo.= FL .O c*s I Ol-- C E a¡ ä eE o) =-(n'vo L â al, v^ o f U' (5 õca I tu€^ o E -(uo ãs O EE (-) C c o o 3 E o (t, È (u >\(/, o) -c I>E ø à. 8. (t E o P5 - c o Þs* re E o o -c o 'EO E st-g;ç3 (! oU' 9o E g ö= -c c c (.) o E L o 3 ,N (E ËåËE o co -o Ø o ü, c b.9 C) Ø (õ oc) (u o (It o-+ (t :uÊËE Ë ÊE€ o c C c ro TU o, OF .c) o E ie¿ c fQ o¡ o L Eâ?Fg o € 0) Ë o, o Þ 'lf o .= (5'--(J=! u, C -o ñ'E: >eoó U' U) F Ë:Ë EQ c c at) o t' (E 0) 'õ o (ú g I9E õc 5 o o) -.E :f c o 9Ë O (S=ts.= o EL .= L !F = o o> F=È þ o, J c) o (.) H=- 9 Ê E o= I <¡ óo 3 (! J o PE F ôÈ C o) U' Þ (EË -c o-\¿ -o Ë o_'lf ! it .= L L c 5 -li o -c (E o 5 (5 o o ø)-LcÞ-^^U C) o 8te Ë o* Bãë Ë ¿ o) sþ J Ø tô õ)- a E oõ o o U' c) o ! F L .l) .n-> L E õ E o c) 0)!o o EË ä€-1 Ë E c o>. E Ë'E ãË E c c 'F t-o o- o .= E€ãq) vlJ gå (5 f o (t 'E.9.¡ o ø $ 9õ; o oo E E lt -É. o o) q) ro -ä; C oo ! Ê Eolo H'Ë o f = tr io (t) c c c ã; c gÈ -c! PP.cÈ 0) U' I oÈ o .c-ÈÈ o ÈE Øo o L ø o_- 5 -> I (E c =() Ø Ø o fE c'r* o o) c) r¡E H ã 3'-: E U) o cL o o p -o 0) o E U' o o c 8õ og -È= c) õ o- ä¡ åÈ o g o c) C, o :AErs o gõ o o N Ø ãE L E gËE -o o L o- Øõ å Ø c f H€ aËg =(t o p tú 5 G õ -o -c o)-> o o äã= o oÈ ú, g õI o o, J cl) >c) ö9Ee= c) go -c o L o 3 f col -È^ru(U o) .9. #o L.=o! €o P EE- E ¿ e o .2 L >\ E o o o.= r5 tØ>> or5 = o'- o (t, c I 0) þ 8_ü 3ã u, (¡) (E Lo LL o c (! -c EE õ c (s Ø- ! o crr* 0) 'Eo L c c $ (¡) -U^- Þ gË (') ñ o) ol -9 ìo c L E# C ) 5 c ì=eüã o) J o, É9. P' o Ee o (E d) o=.=c o c vrc ; al, EE c ö = Lo c o- .; d) > c) = t- o P8 .-J U' - Lflh o) O o E E E (E o Ë8 L ,P p iåÈ* E c o _ut àiË3 a¡ o o- ìq + Eo o (E L o gÈ o o õõ c !* c= L .c) Èe aË U' (t) o c) oF (E o c') o 0) coo(E =U' (t) -..c o) C o) (ú (E NO o L r Ð9 p oË o L L = al, c ^Ltt "E E c) 'ËE t- o an (DOÈO ah tl) c È (5 L Gõ o ok 9J2E9 ) 0) (t¡ * gË* c¡ä -=ok Þ (to c E=ËËËË -c cl) ãõ o F Ë='3 5 Ov\u (¡) (5 (! L o' U' I L c o o o c Ø : 5 g o o o (E r! g d) (E -o .E E Ê =0) J t¡¡ (u (¡) 0) o p o Ê L c c c U' ! o.9 o o o al, cre = c c c 3 'FE = o oo) C) ! L .g 8a o o Lõ o) o, 0) L -c E (E U) c f J o Þ ts U' c o o 't o o (n dl CITIZEN BUDGET RESULTS Page 103 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.2.1 õL ïico:J riUF?L 6Esl I bo Ø o¡o oøEo, .-U€ cõD0) iío q 0) |J' E E H.+€ an Oc ä ã EE .ãi¡ ø v o'S f 0) cÈ o o E ¡ åx 'tr .ã,Ø¡Dø o Ë ;; Ë äË e: ä; o H Þ 0)L 'tr Ë H ÉEë Þ U' sÞaEte E|* ãë8;õ O ()o o. ÊEE q¡ 'F! X oE; -c .o) L o >YN:=E oo o e F EÀ ãt Þ CITIZEN BUDGET RESULTS Page 104 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.2.1 utfË ¡O EID o) (', Pg o)co= or(a .c t^- ah -O O ó_9 E lgp i g* gs 'õ3c(t gg 9)dro E 0)- L -Øoxq Ë'e f c', JE O b9õ 6Ë E c cc = 5 o !U ts o o-o 0) rE (s'õ -ct E *È i 5 E o=ì g!^q-U=1r 0) :o-(Eoo o õ-ø # jJ t!'ã L C e c È> o -(u så OìO -. o - - L F Ë:þ ã:s€ o ooð o) ! OtD -\¿=dl (u = g -o Ë Ø i'=.j. l¿ ^. -. EË .c /tl õ o.- E ËËå L(\$c o -c o o x o) c ä; L - -:= O 5 '=\>LL!^ 99 ø-àË f EË* E;8 E;.P õ E àE Ë o ê'E=(5()!¿ (' =ËE o L .F (E 8t C o (E*].õEiq,i ox.!: c_ E E:.ã o ÑF: I (D0))v it =L Q-(Il:í1f, f €: ot üEç # P th (0 Ø €8 ñ 0) ÈEËË HP iE at o Ë Ê'f: L L H cOlD;;=€ q ËE=E (E õ.e (¡) .c EãiËE .dE ËöEt r 3 ø 9è 8 Pç Ë õE p " !i o.=-o o -a o -':- o-= o o Ø c', ËËëg E oro H õI p=o=-o ;ëc !.s! L9= ö qi := t E .coìiõø .= .= 'FO (t)o ÞE I db 3 .h -y. õ þ= 'ão¡--Ëoõ o(õ ËS-Egvt rEf 8; üe o. x- o-tr Þ-.-x o o¡a.o .c. ÈËÆ=:ËEr Øs o: ->91-co-g¿n eE o >0) Y (t, q¡o o :0 \- o:--¡ qËEË .=: c O ) 5= c o.b ko -c. tr -c. u) f c c (Ú- oø) : s 8d H oo r:>CC cro o-c g o-Q o -(E di > o. Ë Ë * Ë; E o).E ;È = o I c¡ t: uFoo äë Þ c C¿ 'f,oi qe c) õ9 E c_ g 5es c) (Ji o ÊËËE >o>=o L g# o E H H' ËËãE g=Þ å o sõ t- -.(u€! oc=U' a .u, u, 9' EËgÞ: ai, ã; .=c H € --¡ (õgO9O E bE E = (! t -o e O L! oì o I Ë Ë äE ä ãag o =o c o ð 8-e'Ee o-o -Par(J Ê gE g€ o o- E a9 3E ËËgt# F*E > o o -c seË 3 trDc (l)" o) - - .coð (, -c .c **: e ¡Ë 5o=tr .^È-!L ^ 0) .nÊ .t) 9E o l- e -- O) o g9;3Eã àØ o äËË Ë H Ëc o o F 5ËX=È Ø c sc: (¡) -Y- o o ;ìIJÊ>-ìool S s o) u, aÈr : õËEgg¡ €g L üËE eÈË L 9cL-- '¡:c-cÈ58 o q) þ o oË 'õ'd sËe õ ë 'Eooo(D(E(I) (D aB E o È ø gd o- o- ^Ë 5 '--o G_o C) ø JL -o =.s o o q¡ I f o5 f gË .^ o c >- o 3c o- ã ËEE f Ëå 3 lËË þ : .!! >'- (5 a-.-o o -ôC s o -CñO--g- -o c) r¡l- o 9E e-POñg at l¿ ÈÞ 7ø o üãëFþü : -. -j¿.-=!(l)f t-()o-Y o) =õ(t,o-o Ë 8: ä fL É'å-EÈ 3=E s Hã' r--3> =o = oÊF P5 ËË Fe: cI co co, (¡) L =(E o C o- o c o t! o o) .E c) à o o 0) o E o o 0) E C 9b c c Ø C c o lutr o õ .(f, o o o E o o z c z c c C. c E I ox o o) s.e o O 'rE þ'c o q) Ø EA o o= -c I l- m uî o CITIZEN BUDGET RESULTS Page 105 of 239 Agenda Item # 7.2.1 -(' A- E' coN= ui 0¡ Ë! 3B -o ã (E€', ã =:eoEo gït €gD\L* =ec-û .FEco '-oooo- c 5 5p -o¡ø tì I (l):= -C L ;Ëg¡ËI G - oå'\: o - (E o c >,- LC-o = o- E ã E èe,;, 3ãË:åJ o G ååËåË€ .8P P >c õ O >.OFl¿tO Oo HEËË*! -v='>-= - (I'(E>L ã ã ÊËËp EU, -oP8 HËFËËt { äËåË a 3o s:E93s e'Eë-: E o E-o,P > -ciEgËåã o-O c'*= F #i E8E '=:E o l=hofoI9? U'rJ.-y. EgË yã ñ Ë EEä:! þ-E.gE EËeo c ": o:i õo po õñE.s€; E Ë Ë OrY ó ø- €o :3 4EþË ãF õ E ^='- .=.t ó .c.=,9 ø 2. o f.YrO*j! Ê o €3;'.egE o ;ìc o ëËËËËÊfi :o ËT¡E Ë Ê n,(l)p Ç Ë c L.eø "9 o E 3o .9, õ9;Éaø = E 8B .9, gËËÉ o c! H:9888 E .Eñ :¿-t\¿¿ o F- älsÈ88 AseLÉtr:9- åFsË cDf ED Y ()'- (S -o@-9Ë E lÚ õ q -o o-c 5;b; Ê ú'ÊEãßt o r-= eaeÉ€gF å" (9 fc oo:Ë¿õ: rn c\' -ct õ.e .ç€ëøÇ"9=:Ëeàe -EËeEle- 'E EE oO=-ce'út .=r-E!åËË 'Ãú, H sd E äi EEË a øur¿9?Ëo¡ x= g P g'Ë'9 € ou ö8"åË: [ËËäËå Oeo5 Èo Ë Ë ; äg Ë; >-c - E',g äËË i 9= I o Ø Y 33ñ.= =;Ë#: (5 Ë ËåË: .ÞË ; ü;.ë s -<¡Y5* Ë F*ë F c¡ o.Þ I c-Oo -b î, -€àäo @ C u, (¡) E U) o c -c. o 3 (s o) .N U) c C an (E (I¡ o -YL o o o o L c o o G Ê, 3 (Þ = o o oì .C o o-> :J = I¡J Ê -o o. (JCìð co E o.9 Ø E LUt E (J +¡ c o ø,o o o '= U, 3 z O ?a, o '& --C ñ (E o iño o an ì ø É. o c) o p E o 5 U' E c= ! o (, oL : $ o -c .= J ! o -c c o o $ o re, U) CITIZEN BUDGET RESULTS Page 106 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 REPORT TO COUNCIL DATE: November 30, 2017 REPORT: DEV 17-072 FROM: Mark Allen, Director of Development Services FILE: 3030-20/R17-06 SUBJECT: Bylaw 1822 & Bylaw 1823 - OCP & Zoning Amendments for Proposed Supportive Housing Project by BC Housing RECOMMENDATION: 1. THAT Council give First and Second Readings to “Bylaw No. 1822 – Town of Smithers Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 1614 Amendment 17-02”; 2. THAT Council give First and Second Readings to “Bylaw No. 1823 – Town of Smithers Zoning Bylaw No. 1403 Amendment 17-03”; 3. THAT Bylaw No. 1822 and Bylaw No. 1823 proceed to Public Hearing at the January 9th, 2018 Regular meeting. BACKGROUND: At the October 10, 2017 Regular meeting, Town Council reviewed the email dated October 4, 2017, from BC Housing presenting a draft Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to develop permanent housing units, with supports, on the site at 3896 Railway Avenue, and resolved to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding for this purpose. Staff are currently working with BC Housing contacts to complete the MoU wording in preparation for signing. Staff met with BC Housing representatives on October 25th to discuss the MoU, review the Town’s zoning and development process, and to view the site. BC Housing released a new document entitled Rapid Response to Homelessness (Attachment 1) and the rep’s stressed how short their timelines were to start construction in the spring of 2018. DISCUSSION: Site: The proposed site for the Supportive Housing project is Lots 1-3, Block 74, Plan 1054 at 3896 Railway Avenue, at the corner of Queen Street (see map, Attachment 2). The Town purchased these properties in 2015 with the intent to provide the lands for this type of housing project. CAO Dir/DS Dir/FIN Agen Date: December 12, 2017 Dir/CS Dir/WO Bldg Ins In-Cam Date: Admin Asst. Fire Planner Agenda Placement: Bylaws Dir /Rec Air/Mgr PCSO Other: BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 107 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 Council Report Page 2 Report: DEV 17-072 A portion of the grassed area on Town-owned Parcel A has been included in the subject property outline and may be required to provide a large enough site for the project (total approximately 1,326m2 or 14,300ft2). This potentially-required area will be confirmed by BC Housing and brought to Council for approval consideration. BC Housing provided a conceptual layout plan (see lower map in Attachment 2), showing how the proposed development would fit within the subject property dimensions. Zoning: The existing zoning of the area is shown in Attachment 3. The proposed housing site is zoned C-1A, and staff recommend creating a Comprehensive Development Zone (CD 1) and rezoning the subject property from C-1A to CD 1, for the following reasons: • The C-1A zone (a copy is Attachment 4) and C-1B zone are currently the only zones that permit “rescue mission” as a principal use *(see definition at end of Attachment 3). Currently the Broadway Place Emergency Shelter is the only rescue mission use in C-1A. Rescue mission principal use is included in the CD 1 zone. • The Supportive Housing project as outlined by BC Housing would be a combination of uses including supportive housing, the relocation of the Broadway Shelter, as well as the ability to serve as a gateway to housing by accommodating short-term stays. • Comprehensive development zones (CD zones) are ‘one of a kind’, site-specific zones, usually created when rezoning a mix of proposed land uses as an integrated unit that do not match up with existing zones. • This project is a one-of-a-kind designed to serve the specific needs of our community. Hence, the need for a zoning district that allows for the mixing of unique uses. A CD zone is appropriate since no other property in Town is likely to ever have the same mix of use, nor would a similar mix of uses be appropriate in a different location. • Reduced parking requirements are justified due to the fact that the majority of the supports for the housing project are located within walking distance, and most of the residents would not own vehicles. Please refer to Attachment 5 for details on the propose Zoning bylaw amendment. Official Community Plan: The subject property is within the Downtown Commercial land use designation. The OCP supports mixed use in the downtown core. The creation of the CD 1 zone requires a text amendment to the OCP. A location which is walking-distance to support services is a key BC housing’s criteria for funding supportive and social housing projects. Staff recommend Council recognizes the Downtown Commercial designation as the preferred location for supportive and social housing project by amending OCP Section 5.2 Land Use plan and Designations (see Attachment 6). BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 108 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 Council Report Page 3 Report: DEV 17-072 COMMUNICATION: Public notification will comply with Bylaw No. 1807 – Development Procedures and the Local Government Act. The Town and BC Housing intend to host a Public Open House as an opportunity for community members to hear from BC Housing Representatives. The P4HS committee will also participate. Notification signs, newspaper notices and mail out letters will include an invite to the open house, as well as a joint media release, all prior to the Public Hearing date. RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS: The project will require additional staff time for the quick turn-arounds expected in the tight BC Housing timeline. As this rezoning process has been initiated by the Town, the ads and signs will be paid for from Town operating budgets. There is a $1,500 loss of revenue for the Zoning Bylaw and OCP Bylaw amendments. ACCESSIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS: The new facility would include accessible suites and at least 1 parking space designated for persons with disabilities. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Green space will be included on the site with reduced parking requirements. GHG emissions will be reduced with BC Building Code energy efficiency requirements and BC Housing standards. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Add Supportive Housing and Gateway to Housing as principal uses to the C-1A zone, which already includes rescue mission as a principal use; no rezoning required. 2. Rezone the subject property to a residential zone, such as R-8, with Supportive Housing and Gateway to Housing as permitted principal uses. Respectfully submitted by: Submission approved by: ______Mark Allen, P.Eng. Anne Yanciw Director of Development Services Chief Administrative Officer Attachments: 1. BC Housing Rapid Response to Homelessness 2. Site Maps – Subject Property and BC Housing Concept 3. Existing Zoning map of Subject Property area 4. C-1A Zone and Rescue Mission definition 5. Bylaw 1823 Zoning Amendment 17-03 6. Bylaw 1822 Official Community Plan Amendment 17-02 BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 109 of 239 Page 110 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 RAPID RESPONSE TO HOMELESSNESS SUPPORTIVE HOUSING PROGRAM FRAMEWORK October'2017 l"tEdition BRITTSH Corun¿srn OBcHousNc BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 111 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 O Bc HousrNG A. INTRODUCTION ln 2017, the Province of British Columbia announced the Rapid Response to Homelessness (RRH) as an immediate response to the growing issue of homelessness across the province. Partnering with non-profit organizations, government authorities and community groups, BC Housing will create new housÍng unÍts with support services for individuals who are experiencing Homelessness or are At Risk of Homelessness. RRH is an innovative housing solution that provides an immediate housing option and necessary support services for vulnerable individuals, utilizing construction techniques such as modular design to expedite production and rapidly create new, provincially-owned housing units. Modular units will be deployed on land made available by program partners, and can potentially be relocated to future sites as needed. ProperS management and support services will be delivered by non-profit partners. RRH responds to the challenge of homelessness by providing Residents with a safe place to live and access to necessary support services. RRH is part of a suite of programs along the housing continuum (Figure 1)1. This framework outlines key progrann elernents and defines the roles and responsibilities of BC Housing and its partners in the delivery and management of the program. Figure 1: Housing Gontinuum jcl+rJ pãrtrerih¡p íiovêfl ìnreÌlr.Ååg i"lntl slri g. f rì¡trgtivâ* & {:f] n:,ìrjirr--r Froteci¡rJill ,1ci ai)t::, jo,,1j ,ìlî!j'1\ill.aiv ;'o o! i;ìa Iti,,i!:rp -- ii :i,í¡tíl)rr ¡j.,t1,.-i $x¡ìt!ù ;Íi¿!¡, ¡ltlJ !ìilt\a'.rat:,'irlìf i)t¿t!,:!ui:e û!,¿j,a:eata 1 .4, a,},:.di&t' B. PRINCIPLES ñlrvrgqvrgÂffar¡{ahla rrv99rrr!'lra¡¡aina 19ia 9s¡svrrgrrvsaatalrlielra¿l rrrin ¡ammrrniÍiae uriflr r{amnnef¡afar{ naa¡l Housing and supports are accessible and Resident focused . Housing and supports are accessible to all eligible Residents, regardless of ethno- cultural background, religious beliefs, disability, mental health status, gender identity or sexual orientation. A range of services will be available to ensure access for a diverse population. . Operators will be aware of the nature, dynamics and impact of violence against women and work to create a safe and secure environment. . Operators will engage with Residents to assist them in identifying and pursuing their personal and housing goals. This includes providing resources and information to Residents on housing, health care, income and employment services. . An atmosphere of dignity, compassion and respect is maintained. 1 The housing continuum extends from emergency shelter and housing for those experiencing Homelessness through to affordable rental housing and homeownership. This diagram illustrates the level of supports and services residents may need to maintain a stable housing situation and ranges from housing with integrated on-site programs and services through to independent housing in the private market, Rapid Response to Homelessness . Program Framework ' October 201 7 Page 2 of I BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 112 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 O Bc HousrNG Operations are transparent and accountable . Project partners maintain reliable records and fulfil regular reporting obligations. . Operators adopt written policies and procedures that are responsive to Resident needs and communicate their policy and procedure regarding complaints and appeals to all Residents. o A monitoring system provides assurance that an adequate quality of service is provided. . Proiect partners will work towards achieving predetermined program goals and targets. . BC Housing conducts reviews and assessments to confirm that services delívered are effective at meeting the program's objectives. . BC Housing will regularly report to the Provincial Government and the public on the effectiveness of the program. The service environment is welcoming, safe and secure o The health and safety of staff and Residents is of the highest importance. While unlawful discrimination is not tolerated, operators are not expected to deliver services in circumstances where the safety or security of any individual may be threatened. . Operators will have safety protocols in place that provide clear guidance for Resident and staff safety. Protocols should be reviewed periodically by the non-profit partner. . Operators will adopt practices which ensure the safety and security of women, men, transgendered individuals, women and children, couples and families, as applicable. . Co-ed sites will adopt practices and standards that minimize the risk of male violence and ensure that the specialized safety and security needs of women Residents are met. o Co-ed sites will adhere to principles of safe access, safe shared spaces, safe sleeping areas, and privacy . Where possible, gender specific common space should be made available for women Residents. Financial, physical and environmental sustainability . BC Housing is committed to being a leader in environmentally sustainable housing and will strive to incorporate environmentally responsible construction and management techniques into all projects. . BC Housing is committed to the financial and physical sustainability of housing developed through this program, Gollaboration among project partners to improve program effectiveness . Program effectiveness is enhanced through open and collaborative working relationships among operators, partner agencies, landowners, other government agencies and BC Housing. e Program delivery is responsive to community needs and funding reflects local needs assessments, strategic plans, best practice research and evidence-based analyses. . Projects are prioritized in communities where support from municipalities and other project partners is maximized. C. GOALS 1. Break the cycle of Homelessness by providing safe, affordable housing and the supports needed to help Residents remain Housed appropriately. Rapid Response to Homelessness . Program Framework . October 2017 Page 3 of 9 BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 113 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 O Bc HousNc D. OBJECTIVES 1. Rapidly deploy new units of safe and affordable housing with support services for individuals experiencing Homelessness or At Risk of Homelessness. 2. Support communication, partnerships and collaborative initiatives across the supportive housing sector. E. OUTCOMES '1. Additional units of housing with supports are available for individuals experiencing Homelessness or At Risk of homelessness. 2. The immediate needs of the Residents are met by providing safe and affordable housing, and access to support services F. INDICATORS '1. Number of new units created for eligible Residents. 2. Number of RRH Operator Agreements established with non-profit housing partners. 3. Ful! occupancy of the units is maintained with no extended vacancies. G. PROJECT DESIGN Project locations will be identified in collaboration with project partners and may include land owned by municipalities, the province or non-profit organizations. The units will be delivered and owned by the Provincial Rental Housing Corporation2. Project sizes will average approximately forty to fifty units, depending on community needs, and will include features such as communal amenity spaces, laundry, kitchen and social gathering spaces. BC Housing will manage the procurement process in accordance with provincial requirements, managing and facilitating the delivery of projects to specification. H. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES BC Housing is responsible for: . Procuring and constructing suitable housing units. o Working with municipalities and other land owners to identiff and secure suitable sites on which to deploy or construct the units. o Selecting non-profit operators to manage each site. . Provide funding through RRH Operator Agreements for property management and support services. . Developing province-wide standards and guidelines with project partners. . Approving and reviewing annual operating budgets and expenditures. . Conducting regular monitoring and program evaluation. . Working with and supporting operators by: - Assigning a BC Housing representative to act as a liaison; - Providing clear guidelines and expectations; - Providing information, resources and assistance where appropriate; 2 Provincial Rental Housing Corporation is incorporated under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia). PRHC is the land holding corporation for provincially owned social housing. BC Housing administers PRHG, which buys, holds and disposes of properties, and leases residential propert¡es to non-profìt societies and co-operatives. Rapid Response to Homelessness . Program Framework ' October 2017 Page 4 of 9 BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 114 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 O Bc HousrNc Supporting capacity development, partnership development, best practices dissemination and service íntegration; ldentifying gaps in service provision and working collaboratively to respond to gaps; and Providing database support. Landowners are responsible for: ¡ Partnering with BC Housing in the identification, review and selection of appropriate sites. . Providing necessary permissions to facilitate the occupation and use of the land for affordable housing purposes. . Cooperating with BC Housing and the operator regarding the installation and ongoing management of the units. Operators are responsible for: . Resident management, property management and the delivery of support services; . Complying with operational guidelines, program and performance standards; . Maintaining adequate and accurate Resident sêrvice records; o Submitting required program financial data and entering data into the Database; ¡ lnforming BC Housing of any critical incidents or issues that may materially affect the operator's abilíty to fulfil the terms of the RRH Operator Agreement; . Managing staff and provìding appropriate training; o A clear service mandate that outlines how the program will meet Residents needs; and . Developing partnerships with other service providers to enhance service delivery. I. OPERATING FUNDING AND AGREEMENTS Selected operators will enter into an RRH Operator Agreement with BC Housing to operate the units. Agreement terms will be for up to three (3) years. Operating budgets will be negotiated for each operator annually, based on information submitted.by the operator, Program funding will take into account local demand and compliance with program guidelines. BC Housing will administer funds for eligible program costs directly to the operator. Eligible program costs include: . Program staff salaries; o Direct program expenses; . Property management expenses; and . Administration. Operators may secure additional funding from other sources for Resident services and activities not outlined in the RRH Operator agreement. J. RESIDENT ELIGIBILIW AND RENT lndividuals who have an income that is at or below the Housing lncome Limits (HlLs)3 and are experiencing Homelessness or are At Risk of Homelessness, are eligible for housing and supports. 3 Housing lncome Lim¡ts (HlLs) represent the maximum income for eligibility to be a Resident. This maximum is based on the cost of housing in the local community such that the Resident cannot obtain rental housing in good condition meeting National Rapid Response to Homelessness . Program Framework . October 2017 page 5 of g BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 115 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 O Bc HousrNG Adults (aged 19 and older) are the primary target population but families and youth may aiso be served provided appropriate approvals, accommodation and support services are established and are consistent with the operatods mandate. Children underthe age of 19 can receive housing and supports if they are accompanied by their parenUguardian or if they are referred to the operator by a social worker acting under the Child, Family and Community Seruice Act. Other than appropriately approved exceptions, individuals under the age of 19, presenting without a parent or guardian, should be referred to child and youth serving agencies and/or the Ministry of Children and Family Development (MCFD). The province-wide Helpline for Children (310-1234; no area code required) is an available resource. Residents will typically pay a fixed rent, set at the shelter component of income assistance. Operators may elect to calculate a rent that is geared to income based on the rent scale outlined in their RRH Operator Agreement, K. SUPPORT SERVICES Operators may offer a variety of programs and support services, tailored to the operator's mandate and the unique needs of Residents. All operators will offer the following core services to help Residents achieve and maintain stability in housing, enhance access to other community-based supports and services, and foster resilience against Homelessness; . 2417 staffing . Meals, provided as often as specified in the RRH Operator Agreement, and that meet the standards of Eating Wellwith Canada's Food Guide . No-cost laundry facilities accessible to Residents, either on-site or off-site . Support for Residents to maintain their residencies, including but not limited to directly assisting with room de-cluttering, rent payment and repayment plans ¡ lndividual or group support services such as life skills, community information, social and recreational programs . Connecting Residents to community supports and services such as education and employment opportunities, health and wellness services, and life skills . Other supports designed to assist Residents in meeting their personal and housing goals, including culturally-specific programs . uase rlafrfrrilg anu rfesluent lreeus assesstltefìt, tnctuutng tne vulneraoiltty É\ssessnlenl Tool(VAT) . Assistance in accessing lncome Assistance, Pension Benefits, Disability Benefits, obtaining a BC ldentification Card, or establishing a bank account as appropriate L. REPORTING AND REVIEW The intent of the reporting and review process is for BC Housing to work in partnership with operators to identify areas of strength and opportunities to achieve excellence and accountability in the delivery of the program. The cornerstones of review are quality assurance, quality improvement and risk mitigation. Regular reporting and review helps operators and BC Housing to measure progress, work together to better match services to Resident needs, suppod improved service delivery, and demonstrate the effectiveness of the program. Accordingly, the reporting and review tools are designed to open dialogue with operators to help Occupancy Standards without paying more than 30olo of lncome Th¡s max¡mum will be established by BC Housing from time to time. Rapid Response to Homelessness . Program Framework . October 2017 Page 6 of 9 BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 116 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 OBcHousrNc identify and share practices that are working well, as well as elicit feedback from Residents. Reporting and review processes comply with privacy requirements including the Persona! lnformation Protection Act andthe Freedom of Infarmation and Protection of Privacy Act. Reporting and Review Tools The reporting and review system is desigñed to gather quantitative and qualitative information. Several tools are used to elicit a balanced flow of information (Figure 3) to support the operational needs of BG Housing and the operator, monitor program success, identÍfy emerging needs among people who are experiencÍng Homelessness or At Risk of Homelessness, and to shape future program planning. Operators may voluntarily administer additional tools, such as Resident surveys, and may choose to discuss the results with BC Housing. Figure 3: RepoÉing and Review Tools Tool Frequerrcy Cornplcted By Database Daily Operator Fínancial Review Annual BC Housing Operational Review As Required BC Housing Database Operators repoft regularly using the Database, BC Housing establishes timelines for data reporting and mandatory fields. Operators are responsible for obtaining Resident consent. Financial Review Operators submit audited financial statements and other supporting documentation to BC Housing to facilitate an annual review of financial operations. Ooerational Review Operational reviews are conducted as needed and typically every three (3) years to determine fulfilment of the terms of the RRH Operatoi Agreement. The review includes interviews with the operator's management, an on-site visit and physical inspection, and a'review of service policies, and other relevant documents, as requested. M. V¡ BC ng Vice Corporate Services and Chief lOfficer BC Housing Rapid Response to Homelessness . Progrâm Framework . Oc'tober 201 7 Page 7 of I BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 117 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 E;vt¡xt,it.tCi Snrlten O Bc HousrNG Pnocann APPENDIX A: GLOSSARY Adequate Personal Space.'means having freedom from crowding as identified in the Canadian National Occupancy Standards (see Appendix B). At Risk of Homelessness.' means individuals and families living in accommodation where tenancy will be terminated within three (3) months of application (e.9., given notice by landlord) and having no other Housing options, or living in time-limited housing designed to help them transition from Homelessness to living in a more permanent form of Housing (e.9., transitional housing or second-stage housing). Case Planning.'means developing a Resident-focused and mutually agreed upon plan to assist a Resident to integrate more fully into their community. Case Planning will include activities such as an explanation of available options, identification of Resident's goals, explanation of how the operator can support the Resident to achieve desired outcomes, and the benefits, alternatives and consequences of planned services. Database(s).' means the computer applications provided by BC Housing to meet the operational and informational needs of the operator and BC Housing. Homelessness.' refers to a situation where an individual or family is not stably Housed or is living in temporary accommodation where they do not have control over the length and conditions of tenure and do not have Adequate Personal Space. This includes living in: public spaces without legal claim (e.9., on the streets, in abandoned buildings or in tent cities); a homeless shelter, a transition house, a public facility or service (e.9., hospital, care facility, rehabilitation or treatment centre, correctional facility) and cannot return to Housing; or where they are financially, sexually, physically or emotionally exploited to maintain their shelter. Housed or Housing; is defined as accommodation allowing for tenancy of more than thirty (30) days, under conditions in which the individual/family has Adequate Personal Space. This range includes supported, transitional housing to independent social or private market housing. This definition does not include emergency shelters or transition houses. Resídenús; individuals who are eligible for housing and supports pursuant to the Rapid Response to Homelessness. Vuinerabilíty Assessmenl Tool (VAT): mcaRs the assessment tooi used to measure aR individual's level of vulnerability. The tool is designed for use by service providers accustomed to interacting directly with individuals experiencing Homelessness. Training is required to ensure reliable application of the tool. The results are then used to match Residents with Housing. Rapid Response to Homelessness . Program Framework ' October 2017 Page I of 9 BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 118 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 E,urRcrN cy Bc HousrNc Snrrren O Pnocn¡pr APPENDIX B: NATIONAL OCCUPANCY STANDARD Note: The National Occupancy Standard (NOS) is a guideline. While it is ideal, it is recognized that the NOS is not always achievable given the available affordable housing options in a community as well as the fact that Adequate Personal Space is perceived differently from person to person. The NOS has been-developed by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) to help determine the number of bedrooms a dwelling should have to provide freedom from crowding. The NOS determines the number of bedrooms a household requires given its size and composition, According to NOS requirements, suitable housing has enough bedrooms for the size and make- up of resident households. Enough bedrooms based on NOS requirements means one bedroom for: o Each cohabiting adult couple; o Each unattached household member 18 years of age and over; o A same-sex pair of children under age 18; and . An additional boy or girl in the family, unless there are two opposite sex children under five years of age, in which case they are expected to share a bedroom. A household of one individual can occupy a bachelor unit (i.e., a unitwith no bedroom). Rapid Response to Homelessness . Program Framework . October 2017 Page 9 of 9 BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 119 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 120 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 ATTACHMENT 2 – Report DEV 17-072 BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 121 of 239 Page 122 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 1089 1071 1065 3932 3924 3916 3896 3884 3874 3864 3860 3856 3840 ALFRED AVENUE 3931 3913 3911 3895 3887 3879 1027 TOWN R-2 C-1A OFFICE P-1 QUEEN STREET QUEEN ALDOUS STREET ALDOUS 3896 3866 3910 3904 3924 3908 3906 SUBJECT RAILWAY AVENUE PROPERTY 3917 3879 RAILWAY RoW M-3 TITLE: SCALE: 1:1000 at 8.5" x 11" BC Housing Proposed DRAWN BY: LAB DATE: November 7, 2017 Supportive Housing Site APPROVED BY: MFA DATE: November 7, 2017 EXISTING ZONING N:\DEVELOPMENT SERVICES\DEVELOPMENT DRAWING PATH: 2017\R17-06 (BC Housing Project & Airport Parcel Size)\60m Offset Map and Subject Prop.dwg BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 123 of 239 Page 124 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 Division 5 – Commercial Zones Section 5.2 C-1A Downtown Commercial Zone Purpose The purpose of the C-1A zone is to accommodate a broader mix of retail, business, and office uses, together with upper storey residential development, within Downtown Smithers. Permitted Uses Principal Uses 5.2.1 The following principal uses and no others are permitted in a C-1A zone: (a) bank; (b) club, fraternal lodge; (c) public or private school, college; (d) restaurant; (Bylaw 1460) (e) premises licensed for consumption of alcoholic beverages; (Bylaw 1460) (f) entertainment, recreation, including any building used for commercial entertainment and recreation purposes, such as cabarets, beer parlours, cocktail lounges, night clubs, pool halls, bowling alleys, arcades, auditorium, dance and bingo halls, gymnasium, theatres, but excludes automotive and other vehicle sales and service; (g) funeral parlour, undertaking establishment; (h) institutional use; (Bylaw 1460) (i) medical, health service centre; (j) offices for business, professional services; (k) offstreet parking, including parking garage; (l) open-air produce market; (m) hotel; (n) hair stylist shop, drycleaning establishment, appliance repair shop, florist, laundromat, optical or watch repair shop, tailor shop, dressmaking shop, shoe repair; (o) printing, publishing; TOWN OF SMITHERS – Zoning Bylaw No. 1403 Page 50 BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 125 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 Division 5 – Commercial Zones (p) retail sales; (q) studio, including artist, display, music, radio, recording, television, photographic studio; (r) boarding house; (s) day care centre; (t) wholesale sales; (u) on-site manufacture and sale of hand crafted small goods when totally contained in a building; (v) nursery and sale of garden supplies; (w) animal hospital and veterinary facility, when totally contained in a building, and excluding on-site treatment of livestock; (x) rescue mission; (y) youth centre; (z) microbrewery; (Bylaw 1702) Auxiliary Uses and the following and no other auxiliary uses are permitted in a C-1A zone: (aa) parking lot; (bb) residential, provided that: (i) the ground floor of the building shall be used only for commercial purposes; (ii) separate entrances to the dwellings shall be provided from the ground floor front elevation or in the case of a corner parcel, from the ground floor front or side elevation; (iii) subsection (ii) hereof does not apply where a minimum side yard width of one (1) metre is provided; (cc) notwithstanding sub-section (aa) above, not more than one dwelling unit may be located on the ground floor, at the rear of and part of the principal building; (dd) swimming pool; (ee) auction of goods sold in respect of the principal use; (ff) storage and minor repairs of goods sold in respect of the principal use. TOWN OF SMITHERS – Zoning Bylaw No. 1403 Page 51 BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 126 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 Division 5 – Commercial Zones Single Family Dwellings on Specified Parcels 5.2.2 Notwithstanding permitted uses in 5.2.1, the following regulations shall apply to parcels listed in Table 5.2a. a) Permitted Uses: In addition to all the uses permitted in Section 5.2.1, a single family dwelling may be constructed on each of the parcels listed in Table 5.2a. Where a single family dwelling is constructed on a parcel listed in this table, auxiliary uses, as specified in Section 4.1.1 (b) to (e) inclusive, of this bylaw, shall be permitted. b) Other Regulations: Where a single family dwelling is constructed on a parcel listed in Table 5.2a, Parcel Coverage, Setbacks of Buildings, Height and Dimensions of Buildings and Structures, Fencing and Parking, requirements shall be as specified in Table 4.1 of this bylaw. Table 5.2a Legal Description of Parcels Lot Block Plan Lot Block Plan 1-2 39 1054 43-44 54 1054 7-9 39 1054 45-46 54 1054 12-15 39 1054 47-48 54 1054 35-37 39 1054 3-5 57 1054 38-41 39 1054 6-7 57 1054 36-37 40 1054 8 57 1054 38-39 40 1054 11-12 57 1054 47-48 40 1054 43-44 57 1054 5-7 41 1054 Parcel A 57 1054 40-41 41 1054 43-44 58 1054 42-44 41 1054 Parcel B 58 1054 45-46 41 1054 47-48 58 1054 47-48 41 1054 1 & N ½ Lot 2 74 1054 22-24 42 1054 9-10 74 1054 1-2 54 1054 11-12 74 1054 3-4 54 1054 13-14 74 1054 5-6 54 1054 17-18 74 1054 7-8 54 1054 19-20 74 1054 9-10 54 1054 8-9 95 1054 11-12 54 1054 33-34 95 1054 17-18 54 1054 45-46 95 1054 33-34 54 1054 47-48 95 1054 35-37 54 1054 39-40 54 1054 TOWN OF SMITHERS – Zoning Bylaw No. 1403 Page 52 BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 127 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 Division 5 – Commercial Zones Regulations 5.2.3 In a C-1A zone the following regulations contained in Table 5.2b shall apply: Table 5.2b Element Regulations Parcel Size and Coverage Parcel Area No minimum Parcel Width 7 metres minimum Parcel Coverage 100% maximum for all buildings and structures Principal Buildings No. of Principal Buildings 1 Height 3 storeys or 12 metres, whichever is less Auxiliary Buildings No. of Auxiliary Buildings None Parking and Loading Parking and loading in the C-1A zone shall comply with Sections 2.9 and 2.10 contained in General Regulations. Additional Requirements 5.2.4 All storage areas shall be located in the rear of the parcel. TOWN OF SMITHERS – Zoning Bylaw No. 1403 Page 53 BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 128 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 “rescue mission” means a building (or portion thereof) that is used or intended to be used to provide to homeless individuals temporary accommodations, shelter, meals, devotional activities or any combination thereof. Ancillary commercial retail uses may also be permitted provided they are run by a non-profit agency. For the purposes of this section, a ‘homeless individual’ includes an individual who lacks a fixed, regular and adequate night time residence; BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 129 of 239 Page 130 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 BYLAW NO. 1823 TOWN OF SMITHERS ZONING BYLAW NO. 1403 AMENDMENT NO. 17-03 WHEREAS the Council may, under the authority of Section 479 of the Local Government Act, create different zones and regulate uses, density, and siting within each zone; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Town of Smithers, in open meeting assembled, hereby enacts as follows: 1. CITATION: 1.1 This bylaw may be cited as “Bylaw No. 1823 – Town of Smithers Zoning Bylaw No. 1403 Amendment No. 17-03” and takes effect as of the date of adoption. 2. ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISION: 2.1 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase in this bylaw is for any reason held to be invalid by a decision of any Court of competent jurisdiction, the decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of the bylaw. 3. TEXT AMENDMENTS: 3.1 Section 1.2 Definitions of the Town of Smithers Zoning Bylaw No. 1403 is amended by adding the following land use definitions: “Supportive housing” means affordable, long-term housing units, and also provides access to support staff to help tenants lead stable, independent, and connected lives. Tenants may be previously homeless or persons who are at risk of homelessness, who may also have mental illness, have or be recovering from drug or alcohol addictions, or experience other barriers to housing. Supportive housing provides a range of on-site, non-clinical supports, such as life-skills training, and connections to primary health care, mental health or substance use services, that are available to residents of the housing project. Additional services may include meal programs and on- site medical supports, employment and education services, counselling and outreach services. BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 131 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 TOWN OF SMITHERS BYLAW NO. 1823 Page 2 “Gateway to housing” means a publicly-funded facility for the provision of multifaceted transitional housing programs addressing the needs of clients from housing to counseling. The use may include the provision of supportive services to clients such as intake and assessment, case management, nutrition, employment service, adult education, training in budgeting and money management, assistance in securing permanent housing, as well as short-term, overnight accommodation for clients. “Auxiliary building” means a building, the use or intended use of which is ancillary to that of the principal building situated on the same parcel, but excludes a dwelling unit, carriage house or secondary suite. 3.2 Section 1.2 Definitions of the Town of Smithers Zoning Bylaw No. 1403 is amended by replacing the existing definition of “Auxiliary” with the following land use definition: “Auxiliary use” means a land use which is ancillary or subordinate to a principal use. 3.3 Section 1.2 Definitions of the Town of Smithers Zoning Bylaw No. 1403 is amended by replacing the existing definition of “Hotel” with the following: “Hotel” means a building or part thereof, which provides temporary overnight accommodation for transient visitors by way of furnished sleeping units, but does not include Bed and Breakfast Accommodation. Hotel use may include commercial facilities such as restaurant, banquet, beverage, meeting and convention rooms, recreation facilities and personal services for the convenience of guests. 3.4 Table 2.9 in Section 2.9.2 of the Town of Smithers Zoning Bylaw No. 1403 is amended by adding required parking for supportive housing use as follows: Table 2.9 Use Number of Parking Spaces required Commercial Uses CD 1 Zone: Supportive 1 per every 3 dwelling units Housing 3.5 Division 9 Administrative Enforcement of the Town of Smithers Zoning Bylaw No. 1403 is amended to Division 10 Administrative Enforcement and all sections thereafter are to be numbered accordingly. BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 132 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 TOWN OF SMITHERS BYLAW NO. 1823 Page 3 3.6 A new Division 9 CD Comprehensive Development Zones is to be added to the Town of Smithers Zoning Bylaw No. 1403 and is to read as follows: Division 9 CD Comprehensive Development Zones Section 9.1 CD 1 Comprehensive Development Zone 1 Purpose The purpose of the CD 1 zone is to be a ‘one of a kind’ zone that accommodates a mix of land uses associated with a multi-faceted transitional housing program in one principal building. Permitted Principal Uses 9.1.2 The following principal uses and no others are permitted in a CD 1 zone: (a) supportive housing; (b) rescue mission; (c) gateway to housing; Permitted Auxiliary Uses 9.1.3 And the following and no other auxiliary uses are permitted in a CD 1 zone: (d) auxiliary uses customarily ancillary to any of the permitted principal uses (e) one auxiliary building; Regulations 9.1.4 In the CD 1 zone the following regulations contained in Table 9.1 shall apply: BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 133 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 TOWN OF SMITHERS BYLAW NO. 1823 Page 4 Table 9.1 Element Regulations Parcel Size and Coverage Parcel Area No minimum Parcel Width No minimum Parcel Coverage 75% maximum for all buildings and structures Density One dwelling unit per 33.8 m2 Principal Building No. of Principal Buildings 1 Setbacks front yard 0 metres rear yard 0 metres side yard exterior 0 metres interior 0 metres Height 3 storeys or 12 metres, whichever is less Auxiliary Building No. of Auxiliary Buildings 1 Setbacks front yard 6 metres minimum rear yard 0.6 metres minimum or 1.8 metres from a rear parcel line in the case of a carport or garage opening onto a lane side yard exterior 3.5 metres minimum interior 0.6 metres minimum Height 4.9 metres maximum Parcel coverage of aux. building and 10% structures Fencing Height in the required front yard 1.2 metres maximum Height in any other yard 1.8 metres maximum Parking Parking in the CD 1 zone shall comply with Section 2.9 contained in General Regulations. BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 134 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 TOWN OF SMITHERS BYLAW NO. 1823 Page 5 4. MAP AMENDMENT: 4.1 The Zoning map of the Town of Smithers Zoning Bylaw No. 1403 (shown on Schedule "A") is amended by changing the zoning of 3896 Railway Avenue, lands legally described as Lots 1 & 3 Block 74 District Lot 5289 Range 5 Coastal District Plan 1054, Lot 2 Block 74 District Lot 5289 Range 5 Costal District Plan 1054 except the South 12 ½ feet, the South 12 ½ feet of Lot 2 Block 74 District Lot 5289 Range 5 Coastal District Plan 1054, and a portion of Parcel A (See P10198) Block 74 District Lot 5289 Range 5 Coast District Plan 1054 and forming part of this Bylaw: From: C-1A Downtown Commercial To: CD 1 Comprehensive Development Zone 1 BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 135 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 TOWN OF SMITHERS BYLAW NO. 1823 Page 6 READ A FIRST TIME THIS DAY OF , 2017. READ A SECOND TIME THIS DAY OF , 2017. RECEIVED APPROVAL OF THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE ON THIS DAY OF , 2017. PUBLIC HEARING HELD THIS DAY OF , 2017. READ A THIRD TIME THIS DAY OF , 2017. ADOPTED THIS DAY OF , 2017. The Corporate Seal of the Town of Smithers was hereto affixed in the presence of: ______Taylor Bachrach Anne Yanciw Mayor Chief Administrative Officer CERTIFIED A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY of “Bylaw No. 1823 – Town of Smithers Zoning Bylaw No. 1403 Amendment No. 17-03”. ______Dianna Plouffe Corporate Officer YHB/MA N:\WORDPRO\BYLAWS\BYLAWS FRM 1750 TO CURRENT\BL 1823 ZONING AMENDMENT 17-03.docx BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 136 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 TOWN OF SMITHERS SCHEDULE ‘A’ TO BYLAW NO. 1823 Page 7 BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 137 of 239 Page 138 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 BYLAW NO. 1822 TOWN OF SMITHERS OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN BYLAW NO. 1614 AMENDMENT NO. 17-02 WHEREAS the Council may, under the authority of Section 472 of the Local Government Act, may adopt one or more Official Community Plans; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Town of Smithers, in open meeting assembled, hereby enacts as follows: 1. CITATION: 1.1 This bylaw may be cited as “Bylaw No. 1822 – Town of Smithers Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 1614 Amendment No. 17-02 ” and takes effect as of the date of adoption. 2. ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISION: 2.1 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase in this bylaw is for any reason held to be invalid by a decision of any Court of competent jurisdiction, the decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of the bylaw. 3. TEXT AMENDMENT: 3.1 The Town of Smithers Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 1614 is amended by revising the Downtown Commercial (Flex Use) designation in Section 5.2 Land Use and Designations to state: Downtown Commercial (Flex Use): The intent of the Downtown Commercial designation is to encourage a greater intensity and mix of uses (commercial and residential) with pedestrian oriented streets to provide adaptability and flexibility in use over time. Service based businesses, such as retail, restaurants, cafés, as well as professional services, civic facilities, parks, public gathering spaces, appropriate light manufacturing, and a variety of residential uses, including supportive and social housing, are supported. More specifically, this designation is to: • Reinforce Main Street’s status as the downtown core by supporting commercial as the principal use permitted on the ground floor with commercial or residential uses encouraged on upper floors. BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 139 of 239 Agenda Item # 8.1 TOWN OF SMITHERS BYLAW NO. 1822 Page 2 • Support the areas between King and Queen Streets to include a mix of commercial and/or residential as principal or accessory permitted uses. READ A FIRST TIME THIS DAY OF , 20 . READ A SECOND TIME THIS DAY OF , 20 . READ A THIRD TIME THIS DAY OF , 20 . PUBLIC HEARING HELD THIS DAY OF , 20 . ADOPTED THIS DAY OF , 20 . The Corporate Seal of the Town of Smithers was hereto affixed in the presence of: ______Taylor Bachrach Anne Yanciw Mayor Chief Administrative Officer CERTIFIED A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY of “Bylaw No. 1822 – Town of Smithers Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 1614 Amendment No. 17-02”. ______Dianna Plouffe Corporate Officer YHB/ MFA N:\WORDPRO\BYLAWS\BYLAWS FRM 1750 TO CURRENT\BL 1822 OCP AMENDMENT 17-02.doc BYLAWS NO. 1822 & 1823 Page 140 of 239 Agenda Item # 9.1 December 5, 2017 Northwest Community College 3966 Second Avenue Smithers, BC V0J 2N0 Attention: Smithers Mayor and Town Council Members RE: Temporary Student Residence Project Northwest Community College has been actively working with Town of Smithers officials on the development of a potential temporary student residence project that would enable the College to support students attending our programs in Smithers. One of the potential temporary student residence sites that has been identified is the LB Warner site owned by the Town of Smithers. Northwest Community College is seeking Town Council’s approval in principle for the use of this temporary site for a period of 3 to 4 years. This project is very much in an exploratory stage. Please include this letter to the December 12, 2017, Town Council meeting agenda. We will have someone from the College attend the public portion of the meeting. Thank you for considering this request. Sincerely, Denis Caron Director of Facilities and Ancillary Services. cc: Ken Burt, NWCC President and CEO NWCC - STUDENT RESIDENCE Page 141 of 239 Page 142 of 239 Agenda Item # 9.2 November 22, 2017 To Mayor and Council, As council is aware, Boarding for Brant (B4B) is currently raising funds for a renovation and expansion of the Smithers Skatepark, located on Highway 16 beside the arenas and Kiddie’s Park. The existing skatepark has served its users well, but it no longer meets the needs of everyone who would like to use the park. Little kids are competing with big kids and adults for riding space, which is potentially unsafe and more advanced riders are leaving the park to work on tricks that the current skatepark can’t support. The aim of the project is to expand the current facility to include a variety of terrain types, street styles and bowls. The vision is a family- oriented environment where all are welcomed by a design that provides everyone with a stellar experience and will draw the advanced users back to the park, give little kids plenty of space to practice and will attract visitors from surrounding areas. You will remember that previously Boarding for Brant requested and was granted a blanket letter of support with the commitment to manage funds on behalf of the Smithers Skatepark fundraising initiative to submit alongside grant applications for the Northern Development Initiative Trust Community Halls and Recreation Grant and the Regional District of Bulkley Nechako’s Gas Tax Grant on behalf of the Smithers Skatepark Expansion Project. Unfortunately Boarding for Brant has received word from the Regional District that in order to consider the application the Town needs to submit a more specific resolution of support. Please see the instructions below from Kristi Rensby of the Regional District of Bulkley-Nechako “We need a Council resolution for the Town to enter into the agreement with the Regional District for the funding. Suggested wording is as follows: “The (Municipality Name) approves the submission of a Federal Gas Tax Application to the Regional District of Bulkley-Nechako for (Project Name) and furthermore the (Municipality Name) will enter into an agreement with the Regional District of Bulkley-Nechako if the application is approved.” This grant application is currently in front of the board for approval so Boarding for Brant appreciates the Town taking the necessary steps to amend the previous resolution of support for the Smithers skatepark. Thank you for your consideration, Boarding for Brant www.boardingforbrant.com Jason Krauskopf 250-877-9763 BOARDING FOR BRANT - RESOLUTION REQUEST Page 143 of 239 Page 144 of 239 Agenda Item # 9.2 Townof o PO Box 879, 1027 Aldous Street, Smithers, BC VOJ 2N0 Sm1ther Telephone (250) 847-1600 - Fax (250) 847-1601 - www.smithers.ca July 31 ,2017 FILE: 0530-05 VIA EMAIL: [email protected] Mr. Jason Krauskopf c/o Boarding for Brant Dear Mr. Krauskopf: RE: Letter of Suooort to Acco þanv Grant Apolications At its Regular Meeting held July 25,2017, Council approved Boarding for Brant's request for a letter of support to accompany any future grant applications for funding to go towards the expansion of the Smithers Skatepark located on Town-owned property. Council understands the need to draw the advanced users back to the skatepark and to provide more practice space to children. The goal to create a family-oriented environment, offering a variety of terrain types, street styles and bowls, that meets the needs and experience of all riders, is shared by Council. Council is pleased to support your organization and hopes that you are successful in acquiring the funding needed to carry out this important community project. Yours truly, Anne Yanciw Chief Administrative Officer AY/jm \\server\pccommon\wordpro\council replies\2017\07 july\b4b letter of support.docx BOARDING FOR BRANT - RESOLUTION REQUEST Page 145 of 239 Page 146 of 239 Agenda Item # 9.3 From: DCO To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; village.hall@anmore.com; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; belcarra@belcarra.ca; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Info; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Front Desk; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: District of Sicamous - Prevention of Quagga and Zebra Mussels Date: November-30-17 1:30:00 PM Attachments: image001.png 2017-11-29 - Invasive Mussels Letter.pdf TEMPLATE - Invasive Mussels Letter.docx Dear member cities, On behalf of the District of Sicamous please find attached a copy of a letter sent to Honourable Heyman, Minister of Environment and Climate Change Strategy regarding the prevention of quagga and zebra mussels. Mayor and Council are requesting your support in this action. A template letter has been attached for convenience. Thank you on behalf of Mayor and Council, Julia SICAMOUS - QUAGGA AND ZEBRA MUSSEL PREVENTION Page 147 of 239 Agenda Item # 9.3 Julia Payne, Deputy Corporate Officer District of Sicamous | Box 219, 446 Main Street | Sicamous, BC V0E 2V0 t: 250-836-2477 | f: 250-836-4314 Please consider the environment before printing this email and any attachments. The information contained in this communication is confidential and intended only for the use of those to whom it is addressed. If you have received this this communication in error, please notify me by telephone (collect if necessary) or email and delete this communication, attachment, and any copies. Thank you. SICAMOUS - QUAGGA AND ZEBRA MUSSEL PREVENTION Page 148 of 239 Agenda Item # 9.3 District of Sicamous 446 Main Street T: 250 836 2477 PO Box 219 F: 250 836 4314 [email protected] Sicamous, BC E: V0E 2V0 sicamous.ca November 29, 2017 Honourable George Heyman Minister of Environment and Climate Change Strategy Via E-mail: [email protected] PO Box 9047 Stn Prov Govt Rm 112, Parliament Buildings Victoria, BC V8W9E2 Re: Prevention of Quagga and Zebra Mussels Dear Honourable Heyman, On behalf of the District of Sicamous we write to express our concern about the threat of Quagga and Zebra mussels. Sicamous submitted a resolution at UBCM that was endorsed requesting more funding from the Provincial Government to increase awareness and Education for the threat of Quagga and Zebra mussels into BC Lakes. The effects to ALL BC Lakes would be devastating: • Zebra and quagga mussels filter water to the point where food sources such as plankton are removed, altering food webs. This also causes clearer water, allowing sunlight to penetrate deeper, increasing growth of aquatic vegetation. One mussel can produce one million mussels per year. • Impact fish and wildlife by increasing toxic algal blooms. • Large colonies affect spawning areas, impacting the survival of fish eggs. • Affects recreational activities by cutting swimmers feet as a result of their sharp shell • Non-reversible once infested with mussels, all BC Lakes will be contaminated and there is currently no solution to destroy them. • Cost to British Columbia will be Billions, to government, taxpayers and businesses if mussels manage to get into our eco-system • Eco-system compromised, water intakes plugged, fish destroyed, beaches destroyed • No long-term research provided on drinking water quality • Negative tourism impact Solutions: • Guard the boarders - cost British Columbia Millions to guard the boarders 24/7 365 days per year to prevent infestation or Boat border crossing hours, that work. • Train border patrols – this is a serious issue, they must collect the correct information from boaters (of all kinds such as zodiacs, blow up paddle boards) SICAMOUS - QUAGGA AND ZEBRA MUSSEL PREVENTION Page 149 of 239 Agenda Item # 9.3 • More conservation officers, with more authority • This is no longer a campaign, it should now be a department of the government with funding to continue prevention • This is no longer a provincial problem, it is a federal problem, lakes that are contaminated in Canada should not be allowed to let boats leave without inspection to prevent contaminating other lakes. • Transport Canada should now prevent float planes from hoping provinces and states • Education – Major Media campaign announcing BC’s commitment to keep our waters pristine. TV, Billboards, News paper, social media • All Municipalities and Regional Districts should run a banner on their website home pages – “British Columbia is Committed to keeping their lakes Quagga and Zebra Mussel free. Please respect our Lakes and boarder crossing patrols, STOP at the boat inspection stations”. This should have a link to a website explaining the seriousness of this issue, and explain fines for breaking the law by transporting invasive species. • All British Columbia tourism sites should also announce and run the banner on their sites. Tourism will stay healthy if BC lakes stays healthy. • Boaters registration, should include education • Immediate allocations of funds dedicated to research, to enable BC biologists to work on a solution with Manitoba & US studies research groups. Let’s work on removing them, together. • Collaborate with infested US bordering Lakes on research and prevention of cross contamination. • Collaborate with Alberta and Saskatchewan to stay mussel free Funding: BC government will find the funds (billions) if we lose the battle against mussels, as we’ll need to manage the problem. This is how can we help fund the prevention now (millions): • Out of province user pay at all BC boat ramps • Lake passes for BC boaters • All fines are allocated back to the program • Boat registration increase some funding back to project Thank you for your consideration of this issue. Regards, Terry Rysz, Mayor DISTRICT OF SICAMOUS Cc: Mark Zarcharias, Deputy Minister (via email: [email protected]) Wendy Booth, UBCM President (via email: [email protected]) UBCM Members (via emails) SICAMOUS - QUAGGA AND ZEBRA MUSSEL PREVENTION Page 150 of 239 Agenda Item # 9.3 DATE, YEAR Honourable George Heyman Minister of Environment and Climate Change Strategy Via E-mail: [email protected] PO Box 9047 Stn Prov Govt Rm 112, Parliament Buildings Victoria, BC V8W9E2 Re: Prevention of Quagga and Zebra Mussels Dear Honourable Heyman, On behalf of YOUR MUNICIPALITY we write to express our concern about the threat of Quagga and Zebra mussels. Sicamous submitted a resolution at UBCM that was endorsed requesting more funding from the Provincial Government to increase awareness and Education for the threat of Quagga and Zebra mussels into BC Lakes. The effects to ALL BC Lakes would be devastating: • Zebra and quagga mussels filter water to the point where food sources such as plankton are removed, altering food webs. This also causes clearer water, allowing sunlight to penetrate deeper, increasing growth of aquatic vegetation. One mussel can produce one million mussels per year. • Impact fish and wildlife by increasing toxic algal blooms. • Large colonies affect spawning areas, impacting the survival of fish eggs. • Affects recreational activities by cutting swimmers feet as a result of their sharp shell • Non-reversible once infested with mussels, all BC Lakes will be contaminated and there is currently no solution to destroy them. • Cost to British Columbia will be Billions, to government, taxpayers and businesses if mussels manage to get into our eco-system • Eco-system compromised, water intakes plugged, fish destroyed, beaches destroyed • No long-term research provided on drinking water quality • Negative tourism impact Solutions: • Guard the boarders - cost British Columbia Millions to guard the boarders 24/7 365 days per year to prevent infestation or Boat border crossing hours, that work. • Train border patrols – this is a serious issue, they must collect the correct information from boaters (of all kinds such as zodiacs, blow up paddle boards) SICAMOUS - QUAGGA AND ZEBRA MUSSEL PREVENTION Page 151 of 239 Agenda Item # 9.3 • More conservation officers, with more authority • This is no longer a campaign, it should now be a department of the government with funding to continue prevention • This is no longer a provincial problem, it is a federal problem, lakes that are contaminated in Canada should not be allowed to let boats leave without inspection to prevent contaminating other lakes. • Transport Canada should now prevent float planes from hoping provinces and states • Education – Major Media campaign announcing BC’s commitment to keep our waters pristine. TV, Billboards, News paper, social media • All Municipalities and Regional Districts should run a banner on their website home pages – “British Columbia is Committed to keeping their lakes Quagga and Zebra Mussel free. Please respect our Lakes and boarder crossing patrols, STOP at the boat inspection stations”. This should have a link to a website explaining the seriousness of this issue, and explain fines for breaking the law by transporting invasive species. • All British Columbia tourism sites should also announce and run the banner on their sites. Tourism will stay healthy if BC lakes stays healthy. • Boaters registration, should include education • Immediate allocations of funds dedicated to research, to enable BC biologists to work on a solution with Manitoba & US studies research groups. Let’s work on removing them, together. • Collaborate with infested US bordering Lakes on research and prevention of cross contamination. • Collaborate with Alberta and Saskatchewan to stay mussel free Funding: BC government will find the funds (billions) if we lose the battle against mussels, as we’ll need to manage the problem. This is how can we help fund the prevention now (millions): • Out of province user pay at all BC boat ramps • Lake passes for BC boaters • All fines are allocated back to the program • Boat registration increase some funding back to project Thank you for your consideration of this issue. Regards, SICAMOUS - QUAGGA AND ZEBRA MUSSEL PREVENTION Page 152 of 239 Agenda Item # 9.3 Cc: Mark Zarcharias, Deputy Minister (via email: [email protected]) Wendy Booth, UBCM President (via email: [email protected]) UBCM Members (via emails) SICAMOUS - QUAGGA AND ZEBRA MUSSEL PREVENTION Page 153 of 239 Page 154 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.1 From: Bruce McGonigal To: [email protected]; [email protected]; Front Desk; Interior News; [email protected]; Jim Pojar; Lynn Shervill; Alf; Chris Collis; Tom Young; Janet & Troy; Dana; Val Atagi; Allan Edie; Mark Allen; Richard Alton; [email protected]; Len Barak; Craig Stewart; Karen Diemert; Owen Diemert; Daniel Martineau; Daren Fillier; Gail Jenne; George Schultze; George Stokes; Rob Goodine; Mark Thibeault; Mel Monds; Mark Tworow; Sheila Peters; Poppy; Joe Pojar; Richard Jenne; Rick Marshall; Dan SLY; Doug Steventon Subject: Proliferation of Billboards Date: November-28-17 8:15:10 AM I bring to your collective attention a situation that exists in and about the Smithers/Telkwa area, a situation that posses potential motor vehicle driver distraction hazards - an existing situation that is escalating along Highway 16 between the two afore mentioned communities. There is an alarming proliferation of billboards erected and being erected on private property adjacent to the Highway 16 Right of Way. Not only are these growing number of billboards an aesthetic blight to communities of Smithers and Telkwa, and to local and tourist traffic, they also present a clear and obvious distraction to motor vehicle operators driving on the highway. This reality constitutes not only a public concern but a traffic hazard to motorists. A recent one line letter to the Editor of "The Interior News" referenced the above comments - triggering a response from a Mr. Brian Burill (directly or indirectly connected to the Smithers Chamber of Commerce) in which Mr. Burill defends the many billboards with a comment to the effect: "....the signs, without exception, are all professionally prepared and give the tourist and visitors the sense that their various needs can be met..." Succinctly Mr. Burill acknowledges the information for the various commercial business is vital to the tourists and visitors driving on Highway 19 (posted speed is 90 kilometers per hour) but appears to woefully fail to comprehend the reality of driving while reading billboards constitutes a major distraction to all motorists seeking attention and assurance that their various needs are met. It is a public safety issue that will, sooner or later, result in a motor vehicle accident. At 90 Km/Hr....the consequence of an accident could result is serious injury and or death. Not only does the existing number of billboards and proliferation of billboards represent a tawdry eyesore to the communities of Smithers and Telkwa, there is an ever growing sense of urgency to rein in the uncontrolled growth and spread of these unnecessary commercial advertisements along Highway 16.The Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure acknowledges that this matter is a concern throughout the Province of British Columbia and has issued the following paraphrased Public Statement: "The Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure views billboards as a distraction to through traffic, and will not approve of their presence near the right-of-way. Billboards must be placed a minimum of 300 m away from a provincial highway. If a billboard is causing a distraction to motorists, the Ministry official has authority to ensure removal of the billboard as per Section 16 of the Transportation Act.” https://www.th.gov.bc.ca/ permits/Billboards.asp." So, clearly we have a growing public safety concern on the Trans-Canada Highway 16 and many many billboards that represent a meretricious gauntlet blatantly smacking local, tourist and visitor motor vehicle traffic travelling on the highway. It is time our local, regional and provincial governments step up to the plate and set in motion necessary action to deal with the uncontrolled proliferation of commercial BILLBOARDS ALONG HIGHWAY Page 155 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.1 billboards littering our highways, our Beautiful British Columbia and our very attractive communities of Smithers and Telkwa. I thank you for your attention to my above comments and look fondly forward to your hoped for actions required to deal with this matter. Respectfully J Bruce McGonigal PO Box 3825 Smithers, BC V0J 2N0 250 847-2777 BILLBOARDS ALONG HIGHWAY Page 156 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.2 z'Pll' Ô 4a'c' -4 o t/tl Odfú¿.- 7-û ¡ tb E@EIVE r.'ù /6afro ?uulo frto F-l DEC CI 6 2017 6¿" t'ÔJt^z-" frc{.r*o, 'FcuyEa e¡f $rcf,thwrn - J úÍ¿u{'( /þ{" /"7=- '/ û-z'tnu' ãH4' / //+ ,L, L4r\- w (6JK ar ffu^ e2Å-r d"¿- Hþ4j'P6/L'/ W â(4 tk-n-.- Øy¿u-r^-a û14/L_ *u-ta{ uze d-t ph¿¡,-r/¿ t I UlL 6 b ;ta- .*L. LÉ vt/T- tile w?/-( " l* lt/a¿ ,^'"-, s uJ'uL¿ ß. 6tt*rà; þ J ca."' b¿ *r{"þ I /ua-cúzÅ- ç4ft*"r @LSÐ I ?65# f,r"a+n{L, ,J- CAO Dir/lls tf n Dir/FlN tr Agen Dele Dir/CS tl nirruV¡ D Btdg tns tr ln-cem Arlmin Asst. tr Fire [] Planner n Aqenda Placsmentl Rec. Coord. u Air fVlgr U PCSO ll Other; QUICK STATION RESIDENTS - RAIL CONCERNS Page 157 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.2 2itt QUICK STATION RESIDENTS - RAIL CONCERNS Page 158 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.2 3¡ t¡ QUüCK STTATTAN RESNDENTSAASSECUTMON 4flnv 16080 Quick Station Road Telkwa, BC V\J 2X2 QuickS nRe s ident sA s s o c @gm ail. com February 28,20L6 The Honourable Mark Garneau Minister of Transport House of Commons Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6 Dear Sir: We are a rail stop communily in BC's Pacific Northwest since the time of the Grand Trunk Pacific Railway. Like many communities across the country, we have witnessed considerable change in rail transport particularly since the 1980s. We are, as of yet, not well informed on improvements to the regulatory regime and documented improvements in rail safety subsequent to rail mishaps during the previous Federal Administration. We thus take this opportunity to express concerns and pose questions. 1.. RAIL BED INTEGRITY During the time of significant increases in coal export, we were informed by rail line engineers that the existing rail bed was not built to handle the increased weight and volume, We have observed the placement of heavier ballast, the addition and replacement of ties, and the installation and repair of contÍnuous rail. However, the subsurface soils beneath the ballast are not much changed from 1913 so that in certain Iocations they tend to become liquid and move during spring runoff. The filling in of pre-existing ditches along the main line to support the double tracking has also worsened flooding of neighbouring properties and roadways. Does Transport Canada have sufficient geotechnical information with which to identify potential problem areas and require improvements? Are the ongoing rail line inspections paid for by the carrier (CNR), yet subject to credible independent analysis and government oversÍght? 2. CONTAINER CONSTRUCTION We note that railways, particularly those west of the Rockies, follow valley bottoms, often in close proximity to rivers. For the safety of rail communities and the protection of waterwâys, we are seeking assurance that containers for flammables, chemicals, and other hazardous or toxic products be double walled, capped and sealed (i.e. essentially puncture and spill proofJ. 3. ACCIDENT RESPONSE Accident and response time, as documented and published in 2014-15, has been recognized as grossly inadequate. trn the leas! the communities with fire departments andf or emergency response teams must be funded, facilitated, and trained for rapid response in communication and coordination with federal, provincial and corporate emergency response organizations. QUICK STATION RESIDENTS - RAIL CONCERNS Page 159 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.2 Y /,t PageZ of 3 The Honourable Mark Garneau February 28,2016 4. LEVEL CROSSINGS a) All public crossings at grade must be provided with automatic barriers (gates and flashing red lightsJ starting with those near residential communities where electricity is available. As in existing signaling devices, backup power must be available. The present whistle-signalwarnings are inadequate for inconsistent as in CNR's operating manuals) and subject to human error [i.e. not always employedJ. At some approaches, due to terrain, whistle signals cannot be heard in a closed vehicle, yet the whistle is directed across the valley for at least 3 km. The resulting noise pollution already approaches the extreme under present rail traffic volumes. b) Understandably, there is a 1O-minute rule for stationary trains blocking public crossings, However, long, slow-moving trains on secondary lines can take 15 minutes or longer. Emergency vehicles should have the abiìity to signal approaching locomotives to apply the precautionary principle IBRAKES) or [iiJ be pre-warned of the occupied crossing, preferably before the nearest intersection, where alternate routes are available. 5. LOCOMOTIVE IDLING Item#B3 in the CNR System Special Instruction Manual reads "Every effort must be made to conserve fuel and protect the environment by shutting down locomotive diesel engines whenever possible." There must be many exceptions to this policy, as in over a Z-year period, we have observed locomotive shut down on only one occasion. The engÍneer said it was "automatic". The longest idle yet observed at Quick Station approached 7 hours. [NOTE: Extended idling has become increasingly common; the longest yet in 2017 was approximately 34 hours at Quick Station.) 6, EROSION CONTROL AND NOXIOUS WEEDS We note that during highway construction projects, considerable attention is given to slope stabilization, and the reseeding of verges and embankments. These practices are sometimes employed on rural roads. However, the rail right-of-way appears to be exempt. Cut banks continue to slough off, ditches are grubbed out and dumped across the tracks to fall into neighbouring properties, and miles of fill are left naked serving as propagation paths for noxious weeds. Some attribute this negligence to the unwanted incursion of GM Canola into agricultural areas. The resultant use of herbicides, some readily transportable, can find their way into ground water, wells, and nearby water courses. Non-existent or otherwise insufficient erosion control can also exacerbate conditions as in #L above; that is,liquid soils and rail bed integrity. 7. WASTE PRODUCT DUMPING AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS While there has been some effort to clean up rail yards and rail properties within or near municipal boundaries, these efforts have yet to be realized in rural areas, particularly where sidings exist. Waste tie dumps stand for years, and new or near new tie piles off-gas during the warm summqr months, burning eyes and nostrils. Various displays of mechanical-industrial detritus are spread about-from used oil filters to spilt 5-gallon pails of used oil and hydraulic fluid, not to mention the more than QUICK STATION RESIDENTS - RAIL CONCERNS Page 160 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.2 5l tt Page 3 of3 The Honourable Mark Garneau February 28,20L6 occasional offering of human excrement. These offerings exemplify a culture of corporate ignorance, lack of contractual obligations, non-existent oversight, and a blatant disrespect for the environment and neighbouring railline communities. We feel that our attempt to voice some of these concerns at the local and regional offices of CNR have not been taken seriously. A thorough examination and sustained engagement by Federal Authorities is long overdue. We look forward to receiving your response. Sincerely, /*-1 David Gillesp r QSRA QUICK STATION RESIDENTS - RAIL CONCERNS Page 161 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.2 6/t, QUICK STATION RESIDENTS - RAIL CONCERNS Page 162 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.2 ,/,, QWAKSTTmON RESnÐENW{¿SSæL¿WOW 16080 Stæìon Road Tethwa, BC VLJ 2X2 EI crE fuinh É È ' fuickstnRe.sidentsLs s oc@gmaî|. com October 4,2017 The Honourable Mark Garneau Minister of Transport House of Commons Ottawa,Ontario K1A 0A6 Sir: An Update. It is now 19 months since the enclosed (February 20,2016) letter was drafted but not sent. We had hoped that local municipal and regional efforts would y.ield some improvements in CNR's "track record." Sadly, with the increase in rail traffic, all of the concerns as expressed remain problematic, and many have worsened. The enclosed press clippings are only a small indication of the frustrations and lack of progress on a multiplicily of issues. The rail lines and carriers are mostevidently a Federal Government responsibilify and require sustained 'on the ground' involvement. Costs must not be borne by the taxpayer. We expect major improvements in the regulatory regime which must be accompanied by more robust oversight, inspection and enforcement with respect to the following: t. Questionable maintenance practices, derailments, dangerous goods, and the potential for long term environmental damage. u. Public safety, particularly in railside communities and at public crossings. iii. Suspect management, scheduling, and maintenance practices impacting employee health and safety. iv The associated issues of air, land, water and noise pollution. For starters, a near immediate ban on long idling diesel locomotives must be implemented. Alternatives are availabÌe. NOz toxicity is a major health concern. Secondly, the programmed installation of automatic gates, lights, and cameras must be initiated, beginning with residential areas. We look forward to receiving documentation of progress on these issues. Question: Where is the evidence of improvements resulting from the 201,4-L5 Canada Transportation Act Review? Sincerely, dt*^/ David Gillespie for QS QUICK STATION RESIDENTS - RAIL CONCERNS Page 163 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.2 ti,, Page2 The Honourable Mark Garneau October 4,2077 Cc Ginette Petitpas Taylor, Federal Minister of Health Catherine McKenna, Federal Minister of the Environment and Climate Change Nathan Cullen, M.P. for Skeena Bulkley Valley Doug Donaldson, M.L.A. Stikine Lucy Gagnon, Executive Director, Witset [Moricetown) Band Gladys Atrill, Town of Smithers Darcy Repery Mayor of Telkwa Shane Brienen,.Mayor of Houston Chris Beach, Mayor of Burns Lake Bill Miller, chair, RDBN Mark Fisher, representative for Electoral A, RDBN QUICK STATION RESIDENTS - RAIL CONCERNS Page 164 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.2 '7/,, Regional District grills CI\ representative over rail safety By Flavio NÍenow would be major losses in infrastructure, but a Black Pr.ess if train derailment took place next to a river in the North, this would have long-term effects for a The board of directors ol the Regional District number of communities, of Bulkley-Nechako (RDBN) asked some tough Scheffel responded by saying CN takes a,,team questions about rail safety to a representative of approach." In the event of a derailment, CN the Canadian National Railway Company (CN). would work in conjunction with organizations Emile Scheffel. B.C. Regional lead of such as Emergency Management B.C. and comrnunity affairs for CN, presentation -to made a the Ministry of Environment. However, some the RDBN board on Aug. 18 and answered directors were not convinced that this approach questions about rail safety. would be effective in the event of an emergency. Telkwa Mayor Darcy Repen crilicized CN for "I have a sense that w€ are all relying on a team relying too much on local responders in the event approach, but I am not sure that we have all the pieces of a train de¡ailmsnt_ in thât team," said Atrill, adding that CN o."ds to "What lwould like to know is what specifìcally vou make sure communities have adequate equipment have in our regional district to address emergencies and teams in place to deal with emergencies. and where that tearn is located," asked Repen. Burns Lake Mayor Luke Strimbold suggested Scheffel ans¡¡¡e¡ed by saying CN would never tha¿ CN could work in partnership with expect a local fire department to do anything orgarnzations that already have spill response belrond their mandate. equipment such as Cheslatta Carrier Nation. "We rnight ask them to keep people away Scheflel said he would be happy to connect CN,s within a safe distance beoause that's part of their dangerous goods officers with such organizations. mandate, to keep people sa,fe," said Scheffel. the In event of a derailment, a local fire Issue of delays on passenger trains raised department would keep residents within a safe During the board meetilg, Mark Fisher, distance u,ntil dangerous a goods ofïìcer from direbtor of electoral area A (Srnithers Rural), raised CN arrives at th^e sçene. the issue of delays on Via RarJ passenger trains. "someti¡nes that can take longer than we Via Rail trains along the prince George .to like," said, SchefÏel, adding that a response time Prince Rupert corridor are coÍunoniy a few could take up.to six hours. hours late. The reason is that rhey have to wail During thè meeting, Scheffel said CN has for CN freight trains due to limited tracks. one dangerous goods ofÏîce¡ based in Surrey, Scheffel said this is a "tough issue to solve." and another based in Edmonton. In addition. a 'At the sarne ti¡ne that we have people trying CN police offrcer is based in pri¡ce George and to get from point A to point B on Via Rail, we anothet is based ih Prince Rupert. also have [industriaiJ customers in prince Rupert 'jh.l t}¿rg:'èl4qnt an of accident, theyd f,rgure and elsewhere that expect on-time service for out if it is fasier to f1y or drive there; *" g"itfr" their product," he explained. closest resource that we h¿ìe there as fast as Fishe¡ said CN needs to recognìze that Via possible," eiplained Scheffeli Rail passengers are just as important as the Repen said this respd^qse srrategy isn't enough goods that CN is transporting. for the region. ' ".: "It's something that can be done,', said Fishe¡. "We ap.preciate everything that CN does for "Recognizing rhat the people have the right to the region, but we feel that CN needs to step up move." and þke a mr¡ch stronger initiative here in the Atrill said the constant delays of passenger regional district to protect our resources,', he said. trains are a "huge detriment,'to the region. Smithe¡s Coun... Gladys said when Arrill "Peop-le sit [on the train] for a long time; a talking about an envi¡onmental response, six train that should take five or six hours, hsurs sometimes is a long time. takes l0 or 12," she said. "That didnt provide much comfort at all: According to Scheffel, CN won,t be addressing it's actually quite frightening to think about the this issue any time soon. fact that there's lots of stufl moving down the "We are running ou average a dozen to 15 fBulkleyl river corridor," said Atrill. trains a day, so it's a challenging one,,,he said. B-ili Millea RDBN chair, added thar if a rrain "So I can't promise that anything is going to derailment took place in downtown Surrey, there change in that respect any time soon..' QUICK STATION RESIDENTS - RAIL CONCERNS Page 165 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.2 E l¡, i oq I F å¿8 3:=Å 9å Ff. il ì .I cci ss, o ftr å ËË€$iËülu;r CJ C Ë Ërifiåii¡,5ËE À eÊ tr e-6l)),-:iYl- Ê()r\ì Ø IÈ ü EñË13Þ3uÞ€F È Ës*ãEËHäEågE;¡È tt'= E*ËËäËëgFÊ"äEËË+ L ËEËå€.åFs;SË#Ëä lho ËËË EErãËg Et ËF Ëg¡ å;Ë¡;å å;,Ëg LIâ I ËËu.iågiËF EãËi! gË; - ;*{r !€€€Ë ä *; o åËååiË I Jf iËËË**åËå¡ I .f Ì zo f\l o. Ol .Ê E o o or .c È vl l,r f L ååËffåååååååååå ) q,L ü þ íeE;å.- Eå ;E å¡ €I 5 '¡äryåEHqE i; ;.Ë rio st'-. ¡¡ËååååËååIgËså oÊ,,E \o o 4.,,¡ rtr ËËËÊ'Ë;ä$ åräåeË 1\ €a, - ËF:åEËËP se;Ë¡s ,ql {r q, '\a t.s o \q, q Ë ç. tt åiåËs¡ËåËeåiråEË QUICK STATION RESIDENTS - RAIL CONCERNS Page 166 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.2 l-: rf, t. l( / tt |anuary I,20L7 An extended heavy idle in excess of B hours Significant pollution detectable for L km , from engine. /l/C/. 977fl ¿vJ QUICK STATION RESIDENTS - RAIL CONCERNS Page 167 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.2 QUICK STATION RESIDENTS - RAIL CONCERNS Page 168 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.3 From: Statistics Canada / Statistique Canada To: Front Desk Subject: New 2016 Census data available online / Nouvelles données du Recensement de 2016 disponibles en ligne Date: November-29-17 6:57:01 AM (La version française suit.) Dear Mayor Bachrach, Today, Statistics Canada's year-long census story reaches its final chapter. Thanks to the outstanding engagement of Canadians and to your support, the agency is proud to provide high-quality information for communities across the country. Statistics Canada is pleased to release its final major instalment of data on education, labour, journey to work, language of work, mobility and migration. As with previous census releases, the story of Canada as seen through the 2016 Census will be supplemented with infographics and data visualization products, including a new statistical dashboard called the Census Program Data Viewer. This advanced web-based data visualization tool makes data more interpretable by presenting key indicators for basic geographic and sociodemographic data. What's next? A variety of datasets and products will be published over the next few months, including a brand new Community Portrait Tool. This customizable PowerPoint presentation template provides useful tips and embedded links to help you paint your community’s portrait by the numbers using 2016 Census data. Stay tuned by following our official social media accounts on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube. It’s not too late to have your say for the 2021 Census! Until December 8, 2017, Statistics Canada is conducting a public content consultation on the 2021 Census of Population. For more information, please refer to the 2021 Census of Population Content Consultation web page. If you have any questions, please contact Ashok Mathur, by email at [email protected] or by telephone at 604-362- 8186. Anil Arora Chief Statistician of Canada Statistics Canada / Government of Canada [email protected] / Tel: 613-951-9757 Statisticien en chef du Canada Statistique Canada / Gouvernement du Canada [email protected] / Tél. : 613-951-9757 Monsieur le Maire Bachrach, Aujourd'hui, Statistique Canada entame le dernier chapitre de son récit d’un an du recensement. Grâce à la participation exceptionnelle des Canadiens et à votre appui, l'organisme est fier de fournir des renseignements de grande qualité sur les collectivités de partout au pays. Statistique Canada est heureux de publier le dernier volet important de données sur la scolarité, le travail, le déplacement domicile-travail, la langue de travail, la mobilité et la migration. À l'instar des diffusions précédentes du recensement, des infographies et des produits de visualisation des données, y compris un nouveau tableau de bord statistique appelé le Visualiseur des données du Programme du recensement, s'ajouteront à STATISTICS CANADA - 2016 CENSUS DATA Page 169 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.3 l'histoire du Canada, illustrée par le Recensement de 2016. Cet outil Web avancé de visualisation des données facilite l'interprétation des données géographiques et sociodémographiques de base en présentant des indicateurs clés. Prochaines étapes Divers ensembles de données et produits seront publiés au cours des prochains mois, y compris un nouvel outil dressant le portrait des collectivités. Il s’agit d'un modèle de présentation PowerPoint personnalisable qui comporte des trucs utiles et des liens intégrés pour vous aider à dresser le portrait de votre collectivité en fonction des chiffres découlant des données du Recensement de 2016. Restez branchés en suivant nos comptes officiels sur Twitter, Facebook et YouTube. Vous pouvez encore vous exprimer en vue du Recensement de 2021! Jusqu'au 8 décembre 2017, Statistique Canada tiendra des consultations publiques sur le contenu du Recensement de la population de 2021. Pour obtenir davantage de renseignements, veuillez consulter la page Web Consultation sur le contenu du Recensement de la population de 2021. Pour toute question, veuillez communiquer avec Ashok Mathur, par courriel à [email protected] ou par téléphone au 604-362-8186. Veuillez agréer l'expression de mes sentiments distingués. Anil Arora Statisticien en chef du Canada Statistique Canada / Gouvernement du Canada [email protected] / Tél. : 613-951-9757 Chief Statistician of Canada Statistics Canada / Government of Canada [email protected] / Tel: 613-951-9757 STATISTICS CANADA - 2016 CENSUS DATA Page 170 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 From: Mezei, Mila To: Mezei, Mila Cc: Hill, Ange; Stadel, Angela; Martin, Stacee Subject: Reminder to provide feedback on Draft Wild Salmon Policy Implementation Plan by Dec. 15 Date: December-01-17 2:02:16 PM Attachments: 2. Draft WSP IP Fall 2017 Consultations Workbook.pdf 1. DRAFT_2018-2022_WSP_Implementation_Plan_FOR CONSULTATIONS_FINAL.pdf Hello, Thank you to everyone who has participated in an Open House on the Draft Wild Salmon Policy Implementation Plan. Please be reminded that the deadline to submit comments on the draft implementation plan is December 15th, 2017. We welcome your feedback, which may be provided by email to [email protected] or through an online fillable workbook, which may be found here http://www.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/forms/wsp-pss/workbook-cahier-eng.aspx. A summary of what we’ve heard through the consultation sessions will be developed and posted in the new year. Attached is a copy of the draft implementation plan and the consultation workbook (same as online format) for your reference. Please let me know if you have any questions, and thank you again for your engagement and contributions. Mila Mila Mezei Policy Consultation Assistant, Consultations Secretariat Policy Branch/Pacific Region Fisheries and Oceans Canada/Government of Canada [email protected] DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 171 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 DRAFT 2018-2022 Wild Salmon Policy Implementation Plan – For Consultations Initial Draft for Fall 2017 Consultations - This initial draft document is being shared for the purposes of fostering an open and transparent dialogue throughout Fall 2017 on the further development of the Wild Salmon Policy Five Year Implementation Plan (2018-2022). DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 172 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 1 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 173 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 Contents Preface ...... 4 1. Introduction ...... 5 1.1. 2005 Wild Salmon Policy ...... 5 1.2. Wild Salmon Since 2005...... 6 1.3. Pressures on Salmon and Habitat ...... 6 1.4. Importance of Wild Salmon ...... 6 1.5. External Reviews and Consultations ...... 7 2. Context of Wild Salmon Policy Implementation Plan ...... 9 2.1. Purpose of Implementation Plan ...... 9 2.2. The Collaborative Approach / Effective Partnerships ...... 9 2.3. Governance for Wild Salmon ...... 9 3. Overview of the Implementation Plan ...... 18 3.1. Plan Scope ...... 18 3.2. Structure of Plan ...... 18 3.3. Plan Scale ...... 19 4. Implementation Theme 1: Assessment Work ...... 21 4.1. What the Policy Says ...... 21 4.2. Progress to Date ...... 22 4.3. Challenges and Lessons Learned ...... 27 4.4. Priorities for the Next Five Years ...... 28 4.5. Activity Table ...... 30 5. Implementation Theme 2: Integrated Planning and Program Delivery ...... 36 5.1. What the Policy Says ...... 36 5.2. Progress to Date ...... 37 5.3. Challenges and Lessons Learned ...... 40 5.4. Priorities for the Next Five Years ...... 43 5.5. Activity Table ...... 45 6. Performance Evaluation and Reporting ...... 50 2 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 174 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 6.1. Past Performance Review ...... 50 6.2. Performance Evaluation ...... 50 6.3. Reporting...... 51 7. Looking Forward ...... 51 Annex A – Glossary ...... 53 3 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 175 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 Preface When Canada’s Policy for Conservation of Wild Pacific Salmon (Wild Salmon Policy, or WSP) was released in 2005, it captured attention at home and abroad. This groundbreaking document put a new priority on conserving the rich biological diversity of Pacific salmon. At the same time, the policy was explicit about the implementation challenge that lay ahead. Since then, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) has worked steadily to implement the WSP, but acknowledges that progress has been challenged by the scale of effort needed to define biological units of salmon diversity and assess their health status. Independent reviews and consultations, including the 2011 Gardner Pinfold Review and 2012 Commission of Inquiry into the Decline of Sockeye Salmon in the Fraser River (Cohen Commission), reported that a detailed implementation plan was needed. So now, twelve years on, where does the policy stand? Above all, DFO and its partners across British Columbia and the Yukon remain firmly committed to its goal, principles, objectives, and strategies. Indeed, the concerns for Pacific salmon on which the policy was founded may be even stronger today, as climate change adds to the threats being faced by wild salmon. This five-year Implementation Plan (Plan) describes the set of concrete activities to be undertaken within the Department’s resources to meet the goal of the WSP. However, DFO cannot meet the goals of the WSP without the input and work of others, and so this plan also reflects the contributions and successes of Indigenous people, communities, watershed groups, and the many other organizations dedicated to salmon and habitat conservation. It is vital to recognize the aspirations of those who value Pacific salmon and have a long history and knowledge of stewardship, and this plan documents some of the individual successes of partners in salmon conservation. The conservation of wild salmon is a long-term endeavour, and the WSP guides many important ongoing projects that contribute to achieving its goal. This Plan will focus collective effort on developing tools and processes for continued implementation of the WSP. Progress on activities will be reviewed annually, with a full review of this Plan at the end of the five-year period. The political and regulatory landscape in which the WSP operates is constantly evolving, and this Implementation Plan must be able to adapt to changes when they arise. DFO is committed to reviewing the Plan as any new programs and policies related to the Fisheries Act are announced. DFO has listened to the comments and recommendations from the review processes and ongoing consultations. The Department now looks forward to working with partners to put this 2018- 2022 Implementation Plan into action. 4 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 176 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 1. Introduction Wild Pacific salmon are iconic in British Columbia and the Yukon. They hold tremendous value for natural ecosystems, Indigenous people, coastal communities, and the fishing industry. More broadly, their journey home to streams and rivers is a symbol of struggle, renewal, and adaptation for all who live along the Coast and inland watersheds of the Pacific Region. Pacific salmon have diverse, complex life histories that take them from freshwater hatching to rearing in streams, rivers, lakes, and estuaries, to ocean feeding and growth covering up to thousands of kilometres, and home to fresh water for spawning. Over the course of their migrations, they endure wide-ranging environmental pressures, both natural and human-made, and come under the influence of multiple regulatory authorities. This, in turn, makes salmon and salmon habitat management highly complex and uncertain. 1.1. 2005 Wild Salmon Policy The Wild Salmon Policy was released in 2005, following more than six years of drafting and consultation. It marked a Conservation Units (CUs) are major turning point in the management of Pacific salmon by groups of wild salmon articulating a conservation ethic to preserve genetic diversity sufficiently isolated from other groups that, if extirpated, they as well as salmon abundance. In particular, this transformative are very unlikely to recolonize policy introduced the idea of “Conservation Units” (CUs), or naturally within an acceptable aggregates of salmon populations that must be managed for timeframe, such as a human diversity. Overall, the WSP envisions a future of healthy wild lifetime or a specified number salmon populations, sustainable fisheries, and attention to of salmon generations. ecosystem values in salmon and habitat management decisions. 1.1.1. The Policy Framework The WSP established a policy framework of an overarching goal for wild salmon, some guiding principles, and objectives, strategies, and action steps to achieve the goal. The ultimate goal is to: “…restore and maintain healthy and diverse salmon populations and their habitats for the benefit and enjoyment of the people of Canada in perpetuity (DFO 2005, p. 9).” The guiding principles for salmon-related decisions and activities are: Principle 1: Conservation of wild salmon and their habitats as the highest priority in resource management decision-making. Principle 2: Honouring obligations to First Nations in resource management decisions. Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge (ATK) is a Principle 3: Sustainable use by considering collection of knowledge, biological, social, and economic consequences, practices, and beliefs unique to reflecting best science including Aboriginal Traditional Indigenous people and passed Knowledge (ATK), and maintaining the potential for down through generations. future generations to meet their needs and aspirations. 5 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 177 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 Principle 4: Open process for decision-making that is transparent and inclusive. The objectives to achieve the policy goal for wild salmon are to: 1. Safeguard the genetic diversity of wild Pacific salmon; 2. Maintain habitat and ecosystem integrity; and 3. Manage fisheries for sustainable benefits. (The strategies to implement the WSP are outlined in Section 3.2.) 1.1.2. WSP Implementation The WSP committed to the development of an implementation plan within DFO’s existing resource capability and phased in over time. It recognized that the full-scale delivery of conducting the scientific work on identifying and assessing CUs and adapting the Department’s operational programs and activities, would take substantial time and resources. The WSP also acknowledged that successful implementation would depend on forming improved partnerships with Indigenous people, other governments, volunteers, and stakeholders. 1.2. Wild Salmon Since 2005 The WSP was motivated by a convergence of forces. Pacific salmon abundance had fallen sharply during the 1990s, with The Precautionary approach is about being cautious when fishing, low ocean productivity, and deteriorating freshwater scientific knowledge is habitat contributing to the decline. DFO’s policies had shifted uncertain, and not using the towards an emphasis on conservation, sustainable use, and the absence of scientific adoption of the precautionary approach in decision-making. information as a reason to Canada had recognized its obligations to protect biodiversity postpone or fail to take action to avoid serious harm to fish and Aboriginal fishery rights. At the same time, there was a stocks or their ecosystem. new scientific understanding of the importance of biodiversity within wild salmon populations. 1.3. Pressures on Salmon and Habitat Wild salmon complete their life history over a range of freshwater and marine habitats, such as rivers, lakes, nearshore coastal areas and open ocean. The amount of space occupied and time spent in each of the habitats varies by the different salmon CUs. By consequence, there are differences in the level of impact to CUs from natural and human-induced changes to these habitats (e.g., drought, flood, forest cover removal, climate change). Furthermore, salmon CUs face cumulative impacts across the range of habitats throughout their life history. 1.4. Importance of Wild Salmon An enduring impetus for the WSP is the important ecological, cultural, and socio-economic value of wild Pacific salmon. Salmon are a keystone species in marine, freshwater, and terrestrial ecosystems. Many species of fauna and flora—from orcas to black bears to Douglas fir—depend on migrating salmon, as returning adults carry rich ocean nutrients back to spawning grounds. 6 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 178 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 Salmon also serve as an indicator species for demonstrating the cumulative impacts of environmental pressures across freshwater and marine habitats. For Indigenous people, salmon hold a special place not only as a traditional subsistence food, but also as a vital component in ceremonies and social relationships. First Nations communities are inextricably bound to wild salmon and aquatic ecosystems as salmon contribute to their nutritional, spiritual, cultural, social, and economic wellbeing. Wild salmon also support commercial and recreational fisheries that are part of the socio- economic fabric of the Pacific Region. The business spin-offs from this fishing activity—in fish processing, guides, tackle shops, hotels, ecotourism, restaurants, etc.—ripple through the economy, creating jobs and income. Climate Change in the Yukon: A Case Study Perhaps nowhere in the Pacific Region are the impacts of climate change on salmon, their environments, and communities more likely to be observed than in Yukon. The melting of permafrost has drained lakes and caused landslides, releasing sediments into rivers and streams. In the spring of 2016, the retreat of the Kaskawulsh Glacier caused a “river piracy” event that sent water normally flowing north to the Bering Sea flowing south to the Gulf of Alaska and the Pacific Ocean. At more than 3,000 kilometres, the Yukon River is home to the world’s longest Chinook salmon migration. Since 2000, Chinook experienced a sustained decline in abundance to approximately 50% of historical levels. A combination of factors is likely contributing to this long-term change. Declines in marine survival rates, climate variability, and changes to species distribution (leading to potentially increased competition or predation) influence nearly all life stages, making it increasingly difficult to accurately predict recruitment and abundance. Yukon First Nations have experienced the effects of climate change on their reliance on salmon for subsistence (food) and cultural practices. Yukon River Chinook salmon have not been consistently available for the fish camps that serve to pass on teachings and social values, in the tradition of spiritual laws known as the “Doòli”. Bears, a significant salmon predator that would otherwise rely on this essential seasonally-available food source, have been forced to seek alternative prey items – which has led to increased human wildlife conflicts in a number of Yukon communities. 1.5. External Reviews and Consultations Two external reviews of the Wild Salmon Policy’s status and an initial round of DFO consultations have provided “Canada must complete the useful guidance on the development of an implementation implementation of the Wild Salmon Policy. To do so plan: the Gardner Pinfold review (conducted as part of the effectively, DFO must develop a commitment in the policy to review it after five years) and concrete plan for what needs to the Commission of Inquiry into the Decline of Sockeye be done ...” Salmon in the Fraser River (Cohen Commission). Both of Cohen (2012), p. 539. these reports recommended a detailed implementation plan and public reporting of results. 1.5.1 Preliminary Consultations As a first step in engaging Indigenous peoples, stakeholders, and the public in the development of a draft plan, a series of meetings and public open house sessions took place in late 2016 in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Nanaimo, and Vancouver, BC. In February 2017, 7 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 179 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 consultation sessions were held with First Nations and territorial governments and advisory agencies in Whitehorse, Yukon. These consultations revealed strong support for the WSP and agreement that the policy framework (goal, objectives, etc.) remains relevant and useful today. Concerns were expressed about the pace of implementation and the combined effect of funding constraints, changes to the Fisheries Act, and cuts to DFO Habitat staff on implementation capacity. Additional comments included: The WSP Implementation Plan must recognize that access to salmon is integral to the identity, wellbeing, livelihoods, culture, society, and economy of Indigenous people. Conservation and rebuilding of salmon stocks should be the first priority. There needs to be more focus on habitat protection, as most of the focus of WSP implementation to date has been on fisheries management. There should be clear outcomes at the end of the five-year Implementation Plan. These comments and the many others made during these sessions were the foundation for this Plan. 8 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 180 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 2. Context of Wild Salmon Policy Implementation Plan 2.1. Purpose of Implementation Plan The purpose of this Plan is to set out the activities that will be undertaken over the next five years to advance the goal and objectives of the Wild Salmon Policy. These activities reflect what is achievable given existing resources for the 2018-22 period and will be used to measure progress on implementing the WSP. Many activities are ongoing and will extend into the next phase of implementation. This five-year Plan lays the groundwork for continued implementation of the Policy towards its long-term goal. 2.2. The Collaborative Approach / Effective Partnerships Across BC and Yukon, Indigenous peoples, government agencies, stewardship and fishing organizations and communities share a commitment to conserve wild salmon, their habitats, and ecosystems. Indigenous peoples, stewardship organizations, and community volunteers already undertake important work to assess stock status, monitor and report catches, and protect and restore habitat. There are opportunities to build on and share the work associated with conservation of wild Pacific salmon, and to better leverage and coordinate resources. For collaboration to work, data standards, common methodologies, and best practices will be important for consistent implementation of WSP activities by DFO and partners alike. Therefore, one of the key focuses for work over this five-year period will be to identify where existing tools and practices can be expanded for broader application. Applying the collaborative approach includes the development of this Plan with Indigenous people, government partners, and stakeholder groups. Through a series of meetings with First Nations and public open houses from November 2016 – February 2017, participants from across BC and the Yukon shared their ideas and perspectives on what is needed for WSP implementation. They also shared examples of the work they are doing that contributes to the WSP goals and objectives. A working group with participants from the First Nations Salmon Coordinating Committee (SCC), Province of BC (BC), Yukon Salmon Sub-Committee (YSSC), Pacific Salmon Foundation (PSF) and DFO reviewed the contributions and developed this first draft of the Plan. The feedback and contributions that are gathered through the current phase of consultations will further inform a final draft of this Plan. 2.3. Governance for Wild Salmon 2.3.1. Federal Government Canada exercises exclusive legislative jurisdiction over “sea Coast and inland Fisheries,” which includes Pacific salmon, pursuant to s. 91(12) of the Constitution Act, 1867. Canada’s jurisdiction over sea coast and inland fisheries is given effect primarily through the Fisheries Act and related regulations. In addition to legislation and regulations, DFO is guided by a wide range of policy and programs and international commitments related to Pacific salmon, such as those under the Pacific Salmon Treaty, which commits Canada and the U.S. to work together on research, conservation and management of Pacific salmon. As well, the provincial and territorial governments, BC and Yukon First Nations, and local and regional governments have legal 9 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 181 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 authority and rights with respect to land and resource management that impacts wild salmon, their habitats, and ecosystems. While the Wild Salmon Policy itself has not changed since 2005, there have been legal, regulatory, and policy developments that should be considered in its implementation. The WSP is one element of a multi-jurisdictional governance framework that guides and shapes the management of Pacific salmon and their habitats. This five-year Plan takes into account changes in the policy and regulatory environment that have occurred since the WSP’s release. It is expected to evolve as other changes are made over the 2018-2022 period. What Partners are Doing: Regulation Example Placeholder for examples of federal partners in fish and habitat protection – e.g., COSEWIC, Environment Canada hydrometric program and freshwater quality monitoring, or other example? DFO is responsible for the protection of fish and fish habitat under sections 35 through 37 of the federal Fisheries Act. The Department’s management responsibilities include salmon allocation (conservation and use), stock assessment, and habitat restoration and protection. Other federal legislation, such as the Species at Risk Act, Oceans Act, and Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, and the Yukon Environmental and Socio-Economic Assessment Act, provide direction on related matters, e.g., aquatic species at risk, ecosystem-based resource management, and environmental reviews of development projects. Policy Basis for the WSP Since the mid-1990s, a policy framework has evolved to Selective fishing is a support well-managed and sustainable Pacific salmon conservation-based management approach that fisheries. The 2005 WSP was grounded in A New Direction allows for the harvest of surplus for Canada’s Pacific Salmon Fisheries (1998) and its target species while aiming to operational policies: An Allocation Policy for Pacific Salmon minimize or avoid the harvest (1999), A Framework for Improved Decision Making in the of species or stocks of concern, Pacific Salmon Fishery (2000), and A Policy for Selective or to release bycatch unharmed. Fishing in Canada’s Pacific Fisheries (2001). This framework set out the principles of conservation as the first priority for managing wild salmon, sustainable resource use, and an increased role for fishery interests in decision-making. Review of Changes to the Fisheries Act Amendments to the Fisheries Act were made in 2012 through Bill C-38, the Jobs Growth and Long-Term Prosperity Act and Bill C-45, the Jobs and Growth Act. Although some amendments to the Fisheries Act came into force upon Royal Assent of Bill C-38, final amendments from both bills came into force on November 25, 2013. One of the most notable changes to the Act in 2012 was the focusing of its protections on the productivity of fish that are part of a commercial, recreational or Aboriginal (CRA) fishery. Under the new Act, sections 32 and 35 were merged into a single new prohibition in section 35(1) against carrying on “any work, undertaking or activity that results in serious harm to fish that are part of or support a commercial, recreational, or Aboriginal fishery.” In addition, the Fisheries Protection Program (FPP) was formed for the 10 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 182 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 administration of the new fisheries protection provisions of the Fisheries Act, replacing the Habitat Management Program. On November 13, 2015, the Prime Minister mandated the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard to review the previous government’s changes to the Fisheries Act, restore lost protections and incorporate modern safeguards. The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Fisheries & Oceans (the Standing Committee) was asked to examine the 2012 changes to the Fisheries Act and to hear from Canadians. In the fall of 2016, DFO began consultations with Indigenous peoples, provincial and territorial partners, and the public at large to engage and hear from Canadians on the review the 2012 changes to the Fisheries Act. The Standing Committee’s review and DFO’s engagement with Canadians strongly supported restoring the lost protections in the Act, and modernizing safeguards to reflect the evolving nature of fish and habitat management. All of the recommendations from the Standing Committee’s review were supported by the Government in its June 2017 response. Moving forward, the Government intends to consider legislative, policy, and program changes to address the Committee’s recommendations to restore lost protections and incorporate modern safeguards. Any potential amendments to the Fisheries Act, and related policy and program amendments that occur as a result will be assessed and incorporated into this Plan, as appropriate. Other Policy and Regulatory Developments Affecting WSP Governance The WSP was part of the Pacific Fisheries Reform launched in 2005 to address the challenges facing the salmon fishery, especially on the Fraser River. Key themes of this initiative were to sustain strong salmon populations, increase Indigenous peoples’ access to fishing opportunities, and improve the economic performance of fisheries. Since then, a number of other policies and regulatory changes have continued the reform process and supported WSP principles, including: Integrated Aboriginal Policy Framework (2006–) – This framework was created to guide DFO staff on the Terminal fisheries are those renewal of Aboriginal policies and programs, and on the that occur near or in fresh water need for respectful relationships with Indigenous people (e.g., at a river’s mouth) where the targeted species or stock has who seek a greater share of the fisheries resource and a returned to spawn. larger role in resource management. It set out a number of strategies, such as building Aboriginal capacity, increased participation in the commercial fishery, and support for co-management of aquatic resources. Pacific Integrated Commercial Fisheries Initiative, PICFI (2007–) – The goal of this initiative is to pursue sustainable commercial fisheries with First Nations involvement, while maintaining conservation as a priority. In addition to supporting the establishment of 25 Aboriginal Commercial Fishing Enterprises, PICFI has led to the development of a fishery monitoring and catch reporting framework, collaborative management processes (e.g., the SCC), and demonstrations of terminal in-river fisheries for First Nation communities. 11 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 183 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 Sustainable Fisheries Framework, SFF (2009) – The SFF is a suite of policies aimed at ensuring that fisheries management upholds conservation and sustainable use, and supports economic prosperity in the fishing industry. It serves as the foundation for an ecosystem-based, precautionary approach to fisheries management. Component policies include a fishery decision-making framework, a Policy on Managing Bycatch (2013), and Guidance for the Development of Rebuilding Plans (2013). What Partners are Doing: Selective Fishing Examples BC First Nations have been demonstrating terminal, in-river selective fisheries that help protect salmon diversity and promote sustainable use. The combination of terminal fisheries and selective gear means that the pressure on weaker stocks is reduced relative to traditional mixed-stock fisheries in the marine environment. Placeholder for additional examples Fishery Decision-Making Framework (2009) – The Fishery Decision-Making Framework Incorporating the Precautionary Approach applies to key DFO-managed fish stocks that are targeted in a commercial, recreational, or subsistence fishery. Fisheries management plans must include a harvest strategy to keep the removal rate moderate when the stock status is healthy, to promote rebuilding when the status is low, and to ensure a low risk of serious or irreversible harm to the stock. A rebuilding plan is required when the stock reaches a critical level. Pacific Aquaculture Regulations (2010) – The Department has assumed primary responsibility for the management and regulation of BC aquaculture. Regulations were adopted under the Fisheries Act to ensure that the aquaculture industry operates in a sustainable manner. These include requirements for the treatment of fish for disease and parasites, deposition of organic matter, environmental monitoring, and public reporting. DFO fishery officers and fish health staff, who are designated fishery guardians, have the authority under section 49 of the Fisheries Act to collect fish samples from salmon farms during facility inspections and audits. In addition to samples provided by industry, DFO fish health staff collects their own samples to maintain integrity of the specimen for research and audits. DFO also participates in research projects, such as the Strategic Salmon Health Initiative, where samples are collected under agreements with farm operators. Fisheries Monitoring and Catch Reporting (2012) – Fishery managers and harvesters are working on monitoring and catch reporting programs to better balance conservation, ecosystem, socio-economic, and other management objectives. The Strategic Framework for Fisheries Monitoring and Catch Reporting in the Pacific Fisheries outlines the use of consistent risk assessment criteria to determine the level of monitoring required, while recognizing that monitoring and catch reporting programs will be fishery-specific. 12 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 184 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 2.3.2. First Nation Governance The relationship between salmon and Indigenous people goes back far before Confederation and Indigenous people today Aboriginal rights are practices, customs, and traditions that fish for salmon in some of the same places their ancestors distinguish the unique culture of fished since time immemorial. Salmon are not only a food each Aboriginal group. source for Indigenous people; they are also culturally Treaty rights are Aboriginal significant and play an important role in many ceremonies. rights set out in a treaty and Although aboriginal rights and title have existed since time constitutionally protected. immemorial, they were only entrenched in the Constitution Aboriginal title is the right of Act in 1982. Consecutive Supreme Court of Canada Aboriginal groups to use their (Supreme Court) rulings, including Haida Nation and Taku traditional lands and waters. River Tlingit, have affirmed the Crown’s obligation to consult and accommodate Aboriginal groups before undertaking an action that could infringe upon these constitutional rights. Modern final treaty agreements and reconciliation agreements with Indigenous groups in the Pacific Region provide further mechanisms for articulating fishing rights and the role of First Nations in resource management. The Government of Canada is committed to working with Indigenous peoples to chart a path forward to recognition-based relationships. At the core of the Government’s recent release of ten Principles Respecting “Indigenous rights, treaties, Canada’s Relationship with Indigenous Peoples (the and the government to Principles) is the recognition of Indigenous peoples, government relationship must government and laws and their relationship to lands and be recognized in an updated resources. The Principles are rooted in Section 35 (1) of the WSP and implementation plan, as a number of court cases and Canadian Constitution and the United Nations Declaration on modern treaties have been the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, 2007, and were informed by concluded since 2005.” the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s Calls to Action Comment from the 2016/17 and the report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal WSP Consultations Peoples. The Principles give life to a new and transformed era in Indigenous-Crown relations, and guide the Government of Canada’s work with Indigenous peoples. BC First Nations BC is unique among provinces and territories in its large number of First Nations without treaties. In addition to the Nisaga’a Final Agreement which took effect in 2000, three other final agreements are now in place: the Tsawwassen First Nation Final Agreement (2009), the Maa- nulth Nations Final Agreement (2011), and the Tla’amin Final Agreement (2016). The WSP will be implemented consistent with these agreements and any others that are finalized between the federal government and First Nations over the period of this Implementation Plan. In 2006, a BC First Nations Fisheries Action Plan was endorsed by the BC Assembly of First Nations, Union of BC Indian Chiefs, and First Nations Summit (FNFC 2007). This Plan serves as the foundation for First Nations to seek greater participation in the BC fishery and fisheries decision-making. It has common principles with the WSP, including the priority on conservation 13 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 185 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 of aquatic resources, respect for ATK, and shared responsibility for resource management among First Nations and the federal and provincial governments. The Action Plan led to the creation of the First Nations Fisheries Council (FNFC), with members from across BC. The Council works to implement the plan and provide a united voice in support of aboriginal rights and title, treaty rights, and the diverse fishery interests of its members. There is a multi-level approach to First Nations engagement in fisheries decision-making: First Nations only (Tier 1), First Nations and government (Tier 2), and First Nations, government, and stakeholders (Tier 3). Yukon First Nations In 1993, Yukon First Nations and the federal and territorial governments signed the Umbrella Final Agreement (UFA), which provided a framework for negotiations for subsequent final agreements between individual Yukon First Nations and the federal and territorial governments. Since 1993, 11 First Nation Final Agreements (FNFAs) have been signed in the Yukon. Under the FNFAs, individual First Nations have responsibility for managing fish and wildlife on Settlement Lands, including provisions for the basic needs allocation for salmon. Yukon First Nations have made substantial progress in improving their capacity for resource management over the past two decades. They are at different stages of developing and updating salmon management plans for their territories, as FNFAs are implemented. Yukon First Nations have expressed particular concern over the long-term decline in Chinook salmon stocks along the Yukon River. Not only has run abundance declined well below the historical average, but there has also been a reduction in the individual size and age of fish and the proportion of females represented in the population. Consistent with the WSP, Yukon First Nations have adopted targeted management approaches, such as Council resolutions and community-based management plans that meet similar conservation objectives (see further under Section 5.2). 2.3.3. BC Government The Province of BC has jurisdiction over Crown lands, which includes the foreshore, beds of rivers, streams and lakes, and bounded coastal water. As a result, wild salmon and their habitats are directly impacted by provincial decisions on land use and resource development activities, such as forestry, mining, dam construction, agriculture, and highway and pipeline development. In recognition of this, the province has put in place many tools to ensure that fish habitat is protected and maintained during provincially regulated activities, including specific policies in response to Cohen Commission recommendations. The province also carries out the duty to consult First Nations on provincial decisions that could affect salmon habitat and associated Aboriginal Interests. Key provincial tools for protecting fish habitat include the Forest and Range Practices Act (FRPA) and supporting regulations that replace the Forest Practices Code; the Oil and Gas Activities Act (OGGA); the Fish Protection Act since replaces by provisions in the Water Sustainability Act (WSA); and the Riparian Areas Protection Act; and the Water Act and regulations since replaced by the WSA. 14 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 186 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 Forest and Range Practices Act, FRPA (2002) and Oil and Gas Activities Act, OGAA (2008) provide equivalent regulatory direction for fish habitat protection. They both require protection of riparian habitat through required riparian setbacks. Fisheries Sensitive Watersheds provide direction for managing cumulative hydrologic impacts in streams that have significant and sensitive fisheries values. Both regimes require the provision of safe fish passage at stream crossings, and road building practices to manage for sediment input to fish habitat. Wildlife Habitat Areas allow for the protection of the habitat of fish that are at risk. Water Sustainability Act, WSA (2016) – The WSA replaced the old Water Act, enabling a suite of tools to better protect BC’s fresh water. In terms of the WSP, the Act allows the Province to issue temporary orders that prioritize minimum stream flows for fish and ecosystem values during water shortages. It enables the creation of “Water Sustainability Plans” to address water use conflicts and protect ecosystem health. The WSA also allows for the setting of “Water Objectives,” so that land and resource users will consider criteria to sustain water quantity, water quality, and aquatic ecosystems in their decision-making. Riparian Areas Regulation, RAR (2006) – Replacing the former Streamside Protection Regulation, the RAR, which was enacted under the Fish Protection Act (subsequently re- titled the Riparian Areas Protection Act), is designed to complement the Fisheries Act approval process for developments in and around fish habitat. Under the RAR, local governments are directed to pass bylaws requiring residential, commercial, and industrial developments to conduct a science-based riparian area assessment by a Qualified Environmental Professional (QEP). As long as the QEP follows the assessment methods and the development meets any protection measures identified, a potential Fisheries Act violation will be avoided. A Provincial Framework for Steelhead Management in British Columbia St (2016) – A provincial Steelhead “Steelhead are salmonids but are not included in the WSP. Management Framework was developed to protect They are key to groups in the freshwater fish habitat and ensure a sustainable interior of BC, and are recreational steelhead fishery. The policy affirms that, considered in the overall because salmon and steelhead are harvested in mixed management approach related stock fisheries with significant bycatch, the provincial to salmon returning up the Fraser.” and federal governments must work together to balance conservation, ecosystem, socio-economic, and other Comment from the 2016/17 management objectives across species. WSP Consultations Fish and Seafood Act, FSA (2017) – The new FSA is meant to modernize the licensing and regulation of fish and seafood products. It introduced new licences, reporting and training requirements, inspection powers, and penalties to protect food safety and monitor industry performance. For the WSP, the Act promotes sustainable use and benefit by ensuring that BC salmon is responsibly harvested and processed, and can be traced from commercial fishers to consumers. 2.3.4. Yukon Government and Advisory Bodies The socio-political landscape of the Yukon changed dramatically in 1993, when First Nations and the federal and territorial governments signed the UFA and subsequent individual First 15 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 187 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 Nations Final Agreements. These agreements provide for First Nation land ownership and self- determination, and set up a structure for community-based resource management. Chapter 16 of the UFA recognizes the need to ensure the equal participation of Yukon First Nations and other residents in fish and wildlife management processes and decisions. It established new bodies with management responsibilities for salmon and their habitat, which are also cited in 11 of the Yukon First Nation Final Agreements: Yukon Fish and Wildlife Management Board (YFWMB) – This public advisory board serves as the main instrument for fish and wildlife management in the Yukon. It makes recommendations to the Yukon Minister of Environment, First Nations, and the Renewable Resources Councils on all matters related to fish and wildlife management, legislation, research, policies, and programs. The YFWMB is composed of six members nominated by First Nations and six members nominated by the territorial government. Yukon Salmon Sub-Committee (YSSC) – The YSSC is a sub-committee of the YFWMB that advises on salmon management. It makes recommendations directly to the federal Minister of Fisheries and Oceans and to First Nations on any matter concerning salmon and their habitat, including allocation. The YSSC consists of two YFWMB members (one being a First Nations representative) and two members nominated by the Minister. Renewable Resources Councils – These ten advisory councils are the primary mechanism for renewable resource management in Yukon First Nations’ traditional territories. They make recommendations to the particular First Nation, YFWMB, and YSSC on issues related to the conservation of fish and wildlife, including harvesting requirements, salmon management plans, and commercial and other uses of salmon. While the final authority for salmon and habitat management decisions reside with the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans The basic needs level is the (i.e., DFO), the recommendations from these advisory bodies total number of harvestable must be fully considered and documented in an open and salmon of a particular species transparent public process. negotiated in a Yukon First Nations Agreement as a harvest Salmon allocation in the Yukon gives first priority, after allocation to the First Nation in conservation, to the basic needs of First Nations in a its Traditional Territory. particular drainage basin, as set out in their final agreements. Total Allowable Catch (TAC) If the total allowable catch (TAC) is less than the basic needs in the Yukon means the number level, then the TAC is distributed among the affected First of salmon of a particular Nations in proportion to its share of the total basic needs species in a given drainage basin that return to Canadian allocation. If the TAC exceeds the basic needs level, then waters and are deemed not commercial fishing licences are allocated to First Nations. necessary for conservation. The work of the YSSC and Councils, as well as First Nations management plans aligns closely with WSP principles and objectives. The YSSC advises on managing fisheries to ensure conservation, sustainable use, and the restoration of depleted stocks. Under the UFA, traditional knowledge and scientific information are to be integrated for achieving conservation objectives. With the devolution of federal powers in 2003, the Yukon government assumed control over land, water, mineral, and forest resource management for most of the territory. This includes a 16 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 188 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 variety of activities affecting salmon habitat, such as placer mining, farming, road construction, and oil and gas activity. The UFA also created the Yukon Land Use Planning Council and ten commissions to develop regional land use plans. 2.3.5. Local Governments BC municipalities and regional districts also have a role in protecting salmon and salmon habitat through their authority for land use planning and management under Part 14 of the Local Government Act. Therefore, local governments have primary responsibility for fish habitat protection on private land. Further, section 12 of the provincial Riparian Areas Protection Act requires these local authorities to use their zoning bylaws, development permits, or other land use management tools to implement riparian area protection provisions. Other local tools for conserving and protecting salmon habitat include information and educational programs about stream stewardship, watershed and storm water management plans, parkland acquisition, and landowner agreements. 2.3.6. International Agreements The WSP was developed in the context of a number of key international agreements, including the Pacific Salmon Treaty (1985), UN Convention on Biological Diversity (1992), and Pacific Salmon Agreement (1999). Since then, there have been two major developments under the auspices of the Pacific Salmon Treaty (PST) and its joint administering body (the Pacific Salmon Commission), which provide the framework for Canada/US cooperation on salmon conservation and fisheries management: Yukon River Salmon Agreement (2002) – The 1985 PST included a commitment by Canada and the US to carry on further negotiations about Yukon River salmon. Although a temporary agreement was in place for several years (1995-97), a final agreement was not reached until 2001. The Yukon River Salmon Agreement, which forms Chapter 8 of the treaty, sets out a distinct management regime for Yukon River salmon that adheres to the PST’s broad science-based management principles. Administration of the agreement is assigned to the Yukon River Panel composed of Canadian and US representatives. PST Conservation and Sustainability Revisions (2009) – In 2007, the Pacific Salmon Commission began reviewing five chapters of the treaty that were due to expire at the end of 2008. Following extensive consultations and negotiations, a new bilateral agreement was reached for the conservation and harvest sharing of Pacific salmon. The agreement represents a major step forward in science-based conservation and sustainable harvest allocation between the two countries. The revised fishing regimes for 2009 through 2018 are contained in Chapters 1-6 of Annex IV of the treaty. The re-negotiation of expiring PST fishing chapters is underway and anticipated to continue throughout 2017. The objective is to achieve agreement on all relevant Chapters and their ratification before they expire at the end of 2018. Consultations and engagement with First Nations and stakeholders will continue to be an integral part of PST renewal 17 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 189 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 3. Overview of the Implementation Plan 3.1 Plan Scope The 2005 WSP laid out a general approach for maintaining and restoring wild salmon. This Implementation Plan sets out activities that will be undertaken from 2018-2022 to support the goal and objectives of the WSP in an incremental manner within available funding and the current policy context. These activities build on best practices and lessons learned over the last 12 years and are woven throughout this Plan to illustrate some of the progress made since the WSP was released in 2005. The WSP guides work beyond that undertaken by DFO and it is understood that the goal of restoring and maintaining healthy and diverse salmon populations and their habitats cannot be achieved by DFO alone; rather, success depends on working in coordination and collaboration with others. This Plan, therefore, reflects some of the many contributions and successes of Indigenous peoples, communities, watershed groups, and other organizations dedicated to salmon and salmon habitat conservation. Specifically, this document is scoped to: Plan for a five year timeframe; Include activities to be completed within available funding; Include activities to be completed within existing policy framework; Reflect guidance from the WSP; Include a process for reporting DFO-led activities; and Consider best practices, challenges, and lessons learned from pilot projects. 3.2 Structure of Plan This Plan is structured around two key implementation themes that link to the strategies of the WSP: Assessment Work and Integrated Planning and Program Delivery. These themes are organized to reflect the integrative nature of the work and should not be viewed as linear or siloed. Figure 3.2 demonstrates the interrelated nature of these themes and the collaborative work, which is woven through Assessment Work and Integrated Planning and Program Delivery. In this Plan, the Assessment Work theme captured in Section 4 reflects activities related to monitoring and assessing the biological status of salmon, their habitats, and ecosystems. This theme links to Strategies 1, 2, and 3 of the WSP, and reflects the interconnectedness between CU assessment and increasing knowledge of habitat and ecosystem status. The scientific knowledge gathered through the activities completed in the Assessment Work theme feeds into work captured in the Integrated Planning and Program Delivery theme. This theme connects to Strategies 4 and 5 of the WSP and captures how the objectives of the WSP will be met through planning processes and program delivery. These two sections include an overview of the strategies, highlights of progress to date, challenges and lessons learned, and a list of priorities for the next five years. Activity Tables in each section detail the specific Activities, key actors and target dates for completion of specific 18 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 190 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 work being undertaken in support of WSP objectives. Finally, the Performance Review and Evaluation section outlines how the Department will evaluate and report on the progress made towards implementation. A glossary defining key terms is included in Annex A. Figure 3.2: Implementation Themes 3.3 Plan Scale Salmon are such an iconic species for the Pacific Region that work is undertaken at a number of scales. From the biological and physical characteristics of salmon and their freshwater and marine ecosystems to the multiple legal and policy frameworks and program governance structures that apply to Pacific salmon management to the range of actors interested in salmon and salmon habitat, project scales can vary from a small stream to the entire Pacific Region. In selecting a scale for this document DFO focused on the human management scale (see Figure 3.3), and selected the scale to be at the Pacific Region/Area level (e.g. North Coast, South Coast, Yukon Transboundary and Fraser Interior) to balance comprehensiveness with manageability of information. This does not mean that there are not incredible projects being undertaken at a more refined scale. 19 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 191 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 Figure 3.3: Salmon Management Scales Pacific Region Scale for Activities included in this BC / Yukon Implementation Plan. DFO Areas (4): YK/TB NC SC FIA FNFC Geographic Regions (14) e.g. Upper Skeena Major rivers/watersheds Fishery Management Units (46) e.g. Fraser Sockeye CUs/Habitats (> 460) 20 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 192 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 4. Implementation Theme 1: Assessment Work Understanding the current biological status of salmon, their habitats, and the ecosystems that depend on them is foundational to achieving the goals and objectives of the Wild Salmon Policy. To support this work, DFO and its partners, notably First Nations, local stream keepers, the Pacific Salmon Foundation (PSF) and others, monitor and assess salmon stocks and salmon habitat in BC and the Yukon. Within the Department, the responsibility for assessing and monitoring biological status resides in the Science Branch. Biological status assessments are used to advise Integrated Fisheries Management Plans (IFMPs), in-season fisheries management decisions and other day-to-day decisions that act to protect and restore wild salmon (see Section 5 on Integrated Planning and Program Delivery). 4.1 What the Policy Says 4.1.1 CU Assessment and Monitoring Strategy 1 of the WSP calls for standardized monitoring of wild salmon status through three action steps: (1) identify Conservation Units; (2) develop criteria to assess CUs and identify benchmarks to represent biological status; and (3) monitor and assess the status of CUs. CUs are the fundamental unit of Pacific salmon biodiversity. They consist of one or more genetically similar populations with a defined geographic distribution and dependence on a particular set of habitats. The delineation of CUs relies on biological information and local knowledge (e.g., ATK), where available. The biological status of a CU is based on the abundance and distribution of spawners in the Unit. For each CU, higher and lower benchmarks are defined to delimit three status zones: Green, Amber, and Red (Figure 4.1.1). As spawner abundance and distribution decreases, a CU moves towards the lower status zone and the extent of management attention for conservation purposes increases. Figure 4.1.1: CU Status Zones and Benchmarks The lower benchmark between Red and Amber is set at a high enough level of abundance to provide a substantial buffer between it and any level where a CU would be considered at risk of extinction by Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). The 21 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 193 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 higher benchmark between Green and Amber is set to identify whether harvests are less or greater than the level expected to provide, on average, the maximum annual catch for a CU under existing environmental conditions. These benchmarks do not prescribe specific management actions, but rather are used to inform decision-making under Strategy 4 of the WSP. Changes in status will initiate management actions that will vary depending on species, geographic regions, and cause of the decline. A prioritization scheme will be developed to identify CUs or groups of CUs for monitoring and assessment. Different levels of monitoring will be included, such as detailed indicator systems and intensive and extensive surveying. 4.1.2 Habitat Status Assessment Strategy 2 of the Policy requires the assessment of habitat status in three steps: (1) document habitat characteristics within CUs; (2) select indicators (of habitat quantity and quality) and develop benchmarks for habitat assessment; and (3) monitor and assess habitat status. 4.1.3 Inclusion of Ecosystem Values and Monitoring The WSP recognizes the challenges of identifying and measuring ecosystem values and of dealing with environmental uncertainty such as climate change. It favours a gradual approach to developing a scientific understanding and the technical capacity of including ecosystem values over time. Strategy 3 outlines the need to: (1) identify indicators to monitor status of freshwater ecosystems; and (2) integrate climate and ocean information into annual salmon management plans. 4.2 Progress to Date Substantial work has been completed on identifying salmon CUs in the Pacific Region, developing tools and methodologies for biological status assessment and reporting, and conducting CU and habitat status assessments. 4.2.1 Identification of CUs Figure 4.2.1: Total Salmon CUs DFO Science has developed a methodology for identifying the diversity of wild salmon and conducting an inventory of CUs for the five Pacific salmon species (Holtby and Ciruna 2007). CUs are delineated by their genetic traits, biogeographic distribution, life-history characteristics, and traditional knowledge. To date, more than 460 CUs have been identified in BC and the Yukon, but numbers and boundaries will change as new information becomes available (Figure 4.2.1). This total is more than triple the number of CUs originally thought to exist when the WSP was being developed. While most CUs in BC have been identified and delineated, in the Yukon this work is in an earlier phase, with 19 CUs preliminarily identified in the Territory, excluding trans- border/boundary watershed CUs. 22 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 194 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 4.2.2 CU Assessment and Monitoring A toolkit of metrics has been developed for assessing biological status under four classes of indicators: abundance, trends in abundance, distribution of spawning, and fishing mortality (Holt et al. 2009). For several metrics, a pair of benchmarks have been identified that may be common across all CUs (e.g., for trends in abundance metrics), although the exact values may differ (e.g., for abundance metrics). An appropriate suite of metrics and supporting information was selected and successfully applied in the first status assessments of Fraser River sockeye salmon, Southern BC chinook salmon, and Interior Fraser coho salmon CUs (DFO 2013, 2016 and 2015). When the individual metrics are applied to assess status for a given CU, it is possible that each may indicate a different status zone. Therefore, a systematic approach has been developed to integrate biological status across the range of information available (Grant and Pestal 2013). A CU’s first status assessment is conducted on a larger scale. This initial assessment typically involves a workshop where experts discuss the results for the various metrics, determine the CU’s status, and document the factors that led to the particular status designation. Peer review occurs through the Canadian Scientific Advisory Secretariat (CSAS). Recently, the first re-assessment of WSP biological status was conducted for Fraser River sockeye CUs. In this case, the assessment was conducted on a smaller scale, with fewer participants, and over a shorter timeframe. In addition to the status assessments completed for Fraser River sockeye, Southern BC chinook, and Interior Fraser coho CUs, preliminary abundance metrics benchmarks have been identified for Barkley Sound sockeye, Skeena River salmon, Nass River salmon, and Strait of Georgia and Lower Fraser River coho CUs. Trends in abundance metrics benchmarks have also been applied to pink salmon CUs throughout British Columbia (Irvine et al. 2014). PSF is currently working with First Nations on the Central Coast to develop and propose preliminary metrics benchmarks for 116 salmon CUs. All of these metric benchmarks are preliminary because they have not undergone a formal status assessment process led by DFO. To monitor and track CU status, DFO uses existing Stock Assessment Programs as well as partnerships with local Escapement is the number of groups, including First Nations and stream keeper groups. salmon returning to the Monitoring data may include escapement and catch, and spawning grounds. information on stock identification, sex, age, spawning The stock-recruitment success, and the fecundity of spawners. This data draws on a relationship is the number of select number of intensively monitored sites, where more adult salmon (recruits) accurate and precise estimates of escapement, catch, and produced for a given spawner abundance. stock-recruitment are obtained; and extensively monitored sites, where escapements are monitored at a coarser level with lower precision and accuracy, but are over a much broader geographic area. Information from intensively monitored sites may also include data on returning adult salmon (age, sex, DNA, etc.), and on fry and juvenile fish. 23 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 195 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 4.2.3 Access to CU Information DFO stores up-to-date information on the number and identity of CUs in the New Salmon Escapement Database System (NuSEDS), which holds data on adult salmon escapement. This centralized database is available to the public through the Government of Canada’s Open Data Portal. As the numbers and boundaries of CUs change over time, the database will be updated. External partners work with CU info as well. One example is the work that PSF has been doing through its Salmon Watershed Program. Partnering with federal and provincial Figure 4.2.3: Cumulative Pressure government agencies, local First Nation Scores for Freshwater Habitats in the communities, and NGOs, the PSF works to Skeena River Watershed strengthen baseline information relevant to individual salmon CUs and pressures on their freshwater and estuarine habitats. In 2016, PSF launched an online data tool, the Pacific Salmon Explorer, which enables the visualization of information on salmon abundance, status and trends over time, and cumulative pressures on freshwater salmon habitats (see Figure 4.2.3), as well as custom reporting on individual CUs and the export of underlying datasets, which helps support technical objectives identified under Strategies 1 and 2 of the WSP. While PSF’s assessment efforts have focused initially on the Skeena River, it is anticipated that the Pacific Salmon Explorer will eventually be expanded to provide information on salmon CUs for the rest of BC’s North and Central Coast and more broadly across British Columbia. Salmon habitat report cards for the Nass area were developed by PSF in 2016 through direction from the Nisga’a Lisims Government, and in collaboration with the Gitanyow, Gitxsan, and Lax Kw'alaams First Nations, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, BC Ministry of Environment, ESSA Technologies, and other local experts. What partners are doing: public information tools example The Pacific Salmon Explorer (www.salmonexplorer.ca) is an online data visualization tool that gives a high- level overview of salmon CUs in the northern coastal watersheds of the Skeena River. This innovative tool allows users to view more than 60 years of stock assessment data for each CU, and to interact with regional-scale maps showing risks to salmon habitat from land-use and environmental pressures. Users can print summary reports for CUs and download source datasets on salmon populations and their freshwater habitats. 4.2.4 Ecosystem-Habitat Pressures on Wild Salmon CUs Wild salmon complete their life history over a range of freshwater and marine habitats, such as rivers, lakes, nearshore coastal areas, and open ocean. There are differences in the temporal and spatial scales that the different salmon CUs spend in each of these habitats, and, by consequence, 24 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 196 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 differences in the level of impact to CUs from natural and human-induced changes to these habitats (e.g., drought, flood, forest cover removal, climate change). Furthermore salmon CUs face cumulative impacts across the range of habitats throughout their life history. It is evident that habitat characteristics play an important role in salmon CU productivity; thus it is important to understand the pressures on habitat and their role on influencing salmon productivity. At a broad scale, the natural and human-induced pressures on habitat that control salmon life history outcomes and subsequent production variations are understood (see Figure 4.2.4). In addition, there is evidence that salmon CUs exposed to similar habitat regimes tend to behave similarly to broad scale habitat pressures. As a result, there may be utility in grouping salmon CUs based on the characteristics of the habitat / ecosystem in which occupy, particularly within the freshwater environments, for assessment purposes. Such assessments would be based on data rich CUs (i.e., intensive assessments) within a defined habitat area and expanded to data poor CUs within the same defined 1habitat (i.e., extensive assessments). As a collective, the productivity assessments of individual salmon CUs would be defined by habitat characterisation and assessments at a broad spatial scale (i.e., at the level of water sheds rather than individual tributaries). Since responsibility for ecosystem-habitat protection and restoration is not solely the responsibility of DFO, but shared with other levels of government, partnerships and collaborative work are critical to the maintenance of ecosystem and habitat integrity as key elements of implementation. Figure 4.2.4 Natural and Human-Induced Pressures on Salmon Habitat 1Conceptual overview of ecosystem process-drivers, originating within natural or human systems that control salmon population trends and status. Yellow arrows highlight the subset of natural system and human system elements/activities for which DFO is principally responsible (P3, P4, P5, P6, P8, P9). Remaining arrows identify natural and human system process drivers for which other agencies are responsible (e.g. P1-Environment Canada; P2, P3, P7-BC-FLNRO). Red “bullets” identify limited set of local to regional scale activities over which DFO may exert direct control. Differences in arrow sizes are meant to convey some sense of the asymmetry in magnitude of the influence of process drivers on salmon within an ecosystem context. 25 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 197 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 4.2.5 Habitat Status Assessment DFO has identified a preliminary suite of indicators and related benchmarks and metrics, for assessing freshwater habitats (streams, lakes, and estuaries) under the WSP (Stahlberg et al. 2009). The physical and chemical indicators are designed to measure the quantity of habitat (e.g., stream length, lakeshore spawning area), its state or condition (e.g., water temperature and quality, estuary contaminants), and habitat pressure from land and water uses (e.g., road development, water extraction). These habitat indicators have been tested at different levels of assessment, from overview analyses of the habitat pressures in watersheds of CUs, to more detailed initial habitat status reports that examine highly productive and limiting habitats, and threats to them. Initial habitat status reports are being developed for pilot watersheds, including: Sarita River, Cowichan River, Somass River, Bedwell River, San Juan and Gordon rivers on Vancouver Island; and the Lower Harrison River on BC’s Lower Mainland. Habitat report cards can provide a snapshot of the current risks to salmon habitats in a watershed. They draw on pressure and state indicators, vulnerability indicators at different life-history stages, and benchmarks to assign an aggregate risk rating (Red/high, Amber/moderate, and Green/low) for salmon habitat. DFO has completed report cards on freshwater spawning and rearing habitat status for 35 Southern BC chinook CUs. The PSF has prepared regional-scale habitat report cards for salmon CUs in the Skeena River and Nass River watersheds. This work has involved gathering information on key habitat characteristics, such as migration distance and area of nursery lakes for sockeye. 4.2.6 Inclusion of Ecosystem Values and Monitoring Ecosystem monitoring by its nature requires collaboration amongst a number of entities who may be collecting and monitoring data for various purposes and at various scales, and as previously discussed, salmon utilize both freshwater and marine environments. Therefore, work on including ecosystem values and monitoring for CU and habitat includes developing methods for incorporating ecosystem values into resource management decisions. Ecosystem-based approaches in pilot areas, such as Barkley Sound, the Cowichan Watershed, the Okanagan Basin, and the Skeena River Watershed are being used by round table participants (including First Nations, the Government of BC, and local agencies) to determine the best way of incorporating this information in their area. The main focus of this effort has been on developing ecosystem-related indicators and science-based tools for integrating salmon conservation and other planning objectives. Examples include: Multi-trophic level (food-web-related) indicators of changes in lake ecosystems for Barkley Sound sockeye salmon; A web-based decision support tool for balancing fish protection and other water management objectives in the Okanagan Basin; Indicators of riparian ecosystem integrity for salmon-bearing streams based on changes in the salmon predator-scavenger complex; and A status assessment of the Skeena River estuary from the salmon perspective, using habitat pressure and state indicators of water quality, salmon habitat, food, and predation. 26 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 198 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 Research is also ongoing to better understand marine and freshwater ecosystems, including the impacts of climate change and oceanic conditions on salmon survival. Information on the impact of climate and oceanographic data on Pacific salmon (and other marine species) is provided in contributions to Canada’s State of the Ocean reporting (Chandler, King and Perry 2015). 4.3 Challenges and Lessons Learned Progress on the CU inventory and biological status assessments has produced some key lessons learned for further assessment work. 1. Pacific wild salmon are biologically diverse. The large number of CUs identified to date (460+) reflects the high degree of biological diversity that has resulted from thousands of years of adaptation of wild salmon to their local freshwater and marine environments. As a species, pink salmon have the fewest number of CUs (33) and sockeye have the most (256). Sockeye CUs are typically delineated at the level of the individual sockeye-rearing lake(s), based on genetic information. 2. Data deficiencies are a major concern for CU status assessments. For example, nine of the 35 Southern BC chinook CUs and the majority of Yukon River salmon CUs assessed were designated as data-deficient. In some cases, the problem is poor-quality adult salmon escapement data; in others, the spawner survey records exist but have not been entered into the Department’s New Salmon Escapement Database System (NuSEDS). CUs can further be revised based on local traditional knowledge and biological information from DFO and non- DFO sources, and where escapement data are lacking a data-deficient status would also be applied. 3. The identification and assessment of CUs is data-intensive and time-consuming, but there are opportunities for streamlining. The identification and assessment process take time and resources in part because of the need to develop tools and methodologies, technical challenges of data analysis (e.g., extracting CU- specific information from data historically collected on aggregate stocks), and the review processes involved. However, all of these elements are critical to ensuring a sound, science- based determination of CUs and their biological status as the basis for resource management decisions. Opportunities for efficiencies exist, such as closer collaboration with stakeholders already involved in assessments and a smaller peer-review process for periodic assessments of CU status that use methods previously reviewed including periodic re-assessments of CUs. 4. A collaborative, transparent review process helps with the biological status assessments. A key success factor identified in the status assessment for Interior Fraser coho salmon was the collaboration with First Nations, which allowed for timely completion and a more robust assessment given the range of knowledge and experience considered. Another example is the Southern BC chinook Technical Working Group, which is co-chaired by DFO and First Nations and supported the WSP Assessment of Status for southern BC CUs. The process for making an integrated CU status assessment generates not only the status zone designation stipulated in the policy, but also expert commentaries on the rationale behind the designation. These commentaries are helpful in informing fisheries management and other 27 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 199 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 program decisions under Strategy 4 of the policy. Building and sharing an understanding of the status of Pacific salmon and their habitats and ecosystems and factors limiting production helps to facilitate a transparent review process. 5. Pacific Salmon Explorer is a user-friendly public information tool that offers a common baseline of CU status data. Like NuSEDS, the PSF database allows users to drill down to the source data underlying CUs and access information on salmon populations. The ability to link this information through a geographical interface presents maps of freshwater habitat status for different land use activities. This is helpful for First Nations, researchers and other groups who are interested in knowing the status of a local population rather than the CU aggregate, and can be useful in integrated planning. 6. DFO’s science-based risk assessment tools help build understanding and local capacity for the consideration of ecosystem values. Examples are the Fish Water Management Tool developed for fish protection in the Okanagan Basin, and the Risk Assessment for Salmon Methodology used to determine limiting factors for chinook production in the Cowichan River. These kinds of tools can be adapted to other locations and applications. 7. A system is needed for prioritizing the assessment of CU status. There are different reasons why a CU, or group of CUs, may be identified for biological assessment, including international obligations, a decline of a major fishery, and indicator status to name a few. With limited resources, DFO needs a way to prioritize CU and habitat status assessment work. 4.4 Priorities for the Next Five Years The Department has identified the following tasks to focus and further Pacific salmon assessment work over the implementation period: Assessment priorities – DFO Fisheries Management, with Science, will work on a method for prioritizing biological assessments based on conservation and other objectives. Data management and transmission – Consolidate data, method, and reporting standards for monitoring programs to support internal and external consistencies between data collection, including common descriptions of data quality and analyses. Finalization and monitoring of Yukon CUs – CUs have not yet been formally approved for the Yukon and northwestern BC transboundary River Areas, (i.e., the Yukon, Stikine, Taku, and Alsek River Drainages as well as portions of the Mackenzie River Drainage in northeast BC, although preliminary CUs exist.) This would be done in partnership with Yukon and northern BC First Nations and advisory agencies. Data-limited CU assessment – The status assessment process has focused on data-rich CUs. The coverage needs to be expanded by developing methods and metrics to assess data-limited CUs and combining with information for data-rich CUs across biogeo-climatic zones. 28 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 200 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 Ecosystem and habitat - Develop and adapt a classification system for fresh and marine water ecosystems and habitats. Assessment of ecosystem-habitat status – Develop new tools (e.g. coast-wide indicator “stocks”, risk assessment frameworks and methods) to facilitate assessment of ecosystem- habitat status for salmon CUs, Ecosystem-habitat guidance documents – Develop/provide guidance documents regarding inclusion of multi-scale, ecosystem-habitat status and trend observations to inform salmon CU conservation and management. These priorities are further detailed in the Activity Table that follows in Section 4.5 29 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 201 of 239 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 4.5 Activity Table This is just an initial list of activities identified by Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Additional activities will be incorporated throughout Fall 2017. WSP Key DFO Key Contact or Target Initiative Activity Status Objective Sector(s) Partners Web Link Date WSP Region-wide Objective a. Make a current database that WSP 1.1 Continue to identifies CUs will be made Annually Objective 1 – maintain a available to the public via the Science by March Safeguard the database of Government of Canada’s Open 31 genetic Conservation Data portal diversity of Units (CUs) b. A framework for reviewing and March wild Pacific approving revisions to CUs will be Science 2022 salmon established Region-wide a. As required when CUs with 1.2 Continue to unique data sets cannot be fully refine and WSP assessed with existing status expand on Annually Objective 1 – assessment tools, existing metrics existing tools Science by March Safeguard the will be modified or additional to assess CUs 31 genetic metrics will be developed and and identify diversity of evaluated for CUs as prioritized by benchmarks to wild Pacific 1.3a represent salmon b. Consolidate and improve biological Annually documentation of standards for status Science by March Page 202 of 239 data, method, and reporting for 31 monitoring programs Agenda Item # 10.4 WSP Region-Wide Objective 1 – 1.3 Continue to a. Develop and refine a risk-based Annually Safeguard the monitor and approach for identifying and by March Science genetic assess status of prioritizing threats to CU 31, starting diversity of CUs sustainability in 2019 wild Pacific b. Use risk-based approach to Fisheries Annually 30 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 WSP Key DFO Key Contact or Target Initiative Activity Status Objective Sector(s) Partners Web Link Date salmon identify individual CUs or groups Management By March of CUs that are priorities for 31 biological status assessments (links to risk based approach 1.3.a) c. Documented status assessments for CUs or groups of CUs will be Annually, submitted for peer review through Science as available the Canadian Scientific Advisory Secretariat d. Monitor, on a priority basis, CUs Annually using indicator, intensive, and Science by March extensive monitoring approaches 31 e. A database of spawner abundances that is linked to CUs Annually will be maintained in the DFO Science by March NuSEDS database and published 31 via the Open Data portal f. “State of Salmon” program developed to integrate freshwater September and marine information and report Science 2018 annually in a “State of the Salmon” report g. Engage in partnership activities Annually in support of stock assessment work Science by March within First Nations’ traditional 31 territories Page 203 of 239 Fraser and Interior Agenda Item # 10.4 h. As per Cohen recommendation #33, increase number of lakes in the Annually Fraser Basin in which annual lake Science by March stock assessments and monitoring 31 programs are conducted regarding fall fry populations from two to four 31 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 WSP Key DFO Key Contact or Target Initiative Activity Status Objective Sector(s) Partners Web Link Date Region-wide a. Develop and adapt a 1.4 Define classification system for fresh and March 31, WSP Science existing marine marine water ecosystems and 2020 Objective 2 – and freshwater habitats Maintain classification b. Identify a set of core habitat and March 31, systems for environmental indicators associated Science ecosystem 2021 ecosystems & with ecosystem units integrity habitat c. Provide recommendations on March 31, consolidating data associated with Science 2022 identified indicators Region-wide a. Develop a report to reflect environmental drivers of data rich March 31, CU status and trends in Science WSP 2021 1.5 Refine the representative biogeo-climatic Objective 2 – regional system zones or ecoregions Maintain of intensive- habitat and extensive b. On a priority basis, ecosystem ecosystem status, trends and associations will indicators Annually, integrity be assessed within a risk-based Science starting framework informed by 2022 observations of data rich and data limited CU indicators WSP Region-wide Page 204 of 239 Objective 2 – 1.6 Monitor Maintain baseline a. Collect environmental data Agenda Item # 10.4 habitat and conditions of related to CUs (e.g. Monitor Fraser Science ecosystem ecosystems River temperature and flow) integrity WSP 1.7 Extract Region-wide Objective 2 – relevant a. Provide information to state of Annually Science Maintain information on the Ocean forum by March 32 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 WSP Key DFO Key Contact or Target Initiative Activity Status Objective Sector(s) Partners Web Link Date habitat and salmon CUs 31 ecosystem and b. Consolidate and supplement integrity environmental information on salmon from state of Annually conditions in the Ocean Report and create a Science by March marine and report on key interactions and 31 freshwater outcomes for priority marine ecosystems ecoregions from ongoing c. Organize and hold forum to State of the initiate assessments of status and Annually Ocean reports trends of environmental conditions Science by March and other and salmon CUs in freshwater 31 sources ecosystems d. Consolidate and supplement information on salmon and create a Annually report on key interactions and Science by March outcomes for priority freshwater 31 ecoregions e. Synthesize marine and freshwater Annually, information on salmon in State of Science beginning the Salmon report in 2019 Yukon Transboundary f. Working with the U.S. (Alaska) explore development of summary Page 205 of 239 reports on marine ecosystem information in the Gulf of Alaska To be Science Agenda Item # 10.4 and Bering Sea to track influence of confirmed major environmental drivers on variations in key salmon CU status and trend outcomes 33 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 WSP Key DFO Key Contact or Target Initiative Activity Status Objective Sector(s) Partners Web Link Date Region-wide a. Use information from Activities under initiatives 1.4-1.7 to create, test and submit a risk assessment March Science framework of natural and human 2019 induced stressors for scientific review Annually, b. Based on recommendations of following the scientific review, conduct, on a Science completion 1.8 Assess priority basis, risk assessments of scientific impacts of priorities natural and review WSP human induced Objective 2 – stressors on CU c. On an annual basis assess and Maintain status and document the status, trends and habitat and trends (e.g., linkages of projects undertaken Pacific ecosystem resource through the Pacific Salmon Ecosystems Annually, Initiate Salmon integrity development, Foundation’s Community Salmon Management by March April Foundation exploitation, Program within marine and (SEP) 31 1, 2018 (TBC) climate change, freshwater habitats to enable etc.) strategic planning for future habitat and enhancement efforts Yukon and Transboundary d. Explore opportunity for Page 206 of 239 development of data assembly and analysis to inform regional CU-EU Science Agenda Item # 10.4 conservation, protection, enhancement, and assessment priorities WSP Region-wide Objective 1 – 1.9 Study the a. Investigate the use of new To be Safeguard the health of wild research tools to diagnose and study Science confirmed genetic Pacific salmon disease and other conditions 34 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 WSP Key DFO Key Contact or Target Initiative Activity Status Objective Sector(s) Partners Web Link Date diversity of affecting wild salmon wild Pacific b. Continue to co-lead the genomic Annually, salmon research for the Strategic Salmon Science (TBC) by March Health Initiative 31 Fraser and Interior c. Complete scientific research and a risk assessment process with respect to risk of net-pen salmon To be Science farms in the Discovery Islands area confirmed to migrating Fraser River sockeye salmon d. As per Cohen, undertake research at the mouth of the Fraser River to determine abundance, health, and Science Ongoing condition of different CUs prior to entering the marine environment Yukon Transboundary e. Monitor health of wild salmon Annually stocks through provision of samples Science by March for pathological analysis 31 Region-wide WSP a. Support ongoing national and 1.10 Improve Science; Objective 2 – provincial initiatives and increase interagency Ecosystem Maintain interagency communication on Ongoing collaborations Management Page 207 of 239 habitat and cumulative effects assessment and (5year (FPP / ecosystem management issues pertaining to review) SARA) Agenda Item # 10.4 integrity shared aquatic ecosystem values 35 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 5. Implementation Theme 2: Integrated Planning and Program Delivery Productivity and status of salmon populations are generally limited by a variety of biological factors and human threats. An integrated approach is required to address these. The Wild Salmon Policy recognizes the need for integrated strategic planning based on CUs, or CU aggregates, which in turn guides the development of annual work plans and program activities that specify harvest, habitat, and enhancement measures. Both the strategic planning process and the management actions that will be ultimately implemented will be led by DFO in conjunction with First Nations, other government agencies, and stakeholder groups. 5.1 What the Policy Says 5.1.1 Integrated Planning The Wild Salmon Policy specifically identified integrated strategic planning as harvest planning, watershed planning and marine coastal planning. To better reflect the broader scope of work being undertaken, this Plan will consider integrated strategic planning to also include program planning and management decisions that affect salmon and salmon habitat by all DFO sectors. Strategy 4 of the WSP called for the development of long-term strategic plans for CUs and groups of CUs and their habitat subject to common risk factors. These plans are meant to reflect local and regional interests and to integrate information on the status of CUs, their habitats, and the ecosystem. The policy outlined that these plans should: Specify long-term biological targets for CUs and CU “The lifecycle of the Pacific aggregates that ensure conservation and sustainable use; salmon necessitates a planning process that addresses salmon Identify/recommend resource management actions to conservation from the eggs in protect or restore Pacific salmon, their habitats, and the gravel in parental ecosystems in order to achieve these targets; and generations to the eggs in the Establish timeframes and priorities for actions. gravel produced by their offspring.” DFO (2005), p. 24 Recognizing that this planning process would need time to develop, the policy outlined a two-phased approach to integrated planning: 1) Establish a collaborative interim planning process, building on IFMPs, that improves the integration of habitat, enhancement, fisheries, and marine area planning; and 2) Develop a new integrated planning structure that will better meet the needs of salmon and their environments over the long term. Finally, the WSP outlined a five-step procedure for developing strategic plans: (1) identify planning priorities; (2) identify resource management options and alternative management strategies; (3) establish biological, social, and economic performance indicators; (4) assess the likely impacts of management alternatives; and (5) select the preferred management alternative. 36 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 208 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 5.1.2 Program Delivery Strategy 5 of the Policy requires the development of annual work plans that set out specific management and program activities, in particular: Assessing CU status; Annual fishery plans, including requirements for fisheries and rules for in-season management; Annual work plans for habitat restoration and protection ; and Annual enhancement plans. What partners are doing: local government initiative examples Metro Vancouver regional parks are home to five hatcheries that produce a large number of salmon fry that are released in creeks and rivers in BC. Only one of these hatcheries (Capilano River) is operated by DFO. The hatcheries draw visitors to the parks, where public education programs on stewardship are supported by the PSF. 5.1.3 CUs in the Red Zone The WSP identifies salmon CUs in the Red zone that are vulnerable to fisheries as a management priority. For these priority CUs, DFO should consult and collaborate with First Nations and other interests to gather information and make recommendations that will inform harvest, habitat, and enhancement planning. The Department should also pay attention to other vulnerable CUs (e.g., ones in the Amber zone) that could decline in status. 5.2 Progress to Date Consistent with the intent of the WSP, implementation of Strategy 4 has occurred in an incremental manner and work continues to collaboratively develop CU-compliant integrated strategic plans as the resources and capacities of DFO and partners permit. The Department is still in the interim phase of integrated planning development; however, a series of pilots has successfully demonstrated the elements of an integrated planning approach. The Department is also incorporating WSP principles into its annual operating plans. 5.2.1 Salmon Planning Pilots Several strategic planning initiatives have tested innovative, integrated planning at different geographic scales, which have six common steps: 1. Develop a clear vision and goals. 2. Understand the status of fish and fish habitat. 3. Identify limiting factors and threats, including either real or assessed risk. 4. Identify options and actions. 5. Develop strategic plans. 6. Implement and monitor the plans. These pilots offer several lessons that can be used moving forward with WSP work, and are summarized below. 37 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 209 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 Fraser River Sockeye Spawning Initiative, FRSSI (2002–): The Department uses WSP principles in developing annual spawning escapement targets for Fraser River sockeye salmon. This process combines model simulations and workshops and feedback from First Nations and stakeholders to examine the long-term impact of different escapement strategies in achieving both conservation and harvest objectives. What partners are doing: strategic planning examples The Fraser Salmon Management Council represents 69 First Nations in the Fraser River Watershed and Vancouver Island and marine approach areas. The Council has been negotiating [check status] an agreement with DFO to provide input into management of the FSC fishery. An annual forum allows Council members to present their advice and recommendations on fishery management plans. In 2015, the Nechako Watershed Roundtable was formed with membership from the provincial and local governments, First Nations, NGOs, and the public. The Fraser Basin Council prepared a Watershed Strategy with actions to address priority concerns, including water quality and quantity, fish and wildlife, and ecosystems. Skeena Watershed Initiative (2008–2011): This collaborative effort of First Nations, government agencies, and conservation and fishery interests looked at ways to improve the management of Skeena salmon and steelhead in a manner consistent with WSP guidance. The PSF sponsored a suite of scientific studies (e.g., enumeration surveys, CU and habitat status assessments) with funding from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation and the Living Rivers Trust Fund to support this work, which can be found at www.skeenawatershedinitiative.com Barkley Sound Sockeye and Chinook: The Barkley Sound WSP pilot has explored the features of integrated management (CUs, habitats, ecosystem). The Area 23 Salmon Harvest Committee was created with First Nations and A fishery reference point (FRP) is a point at which stakeholder members to advise DFO on annual harvest plans management actions occur. An and in-season decisions. The committee has produced a local example is the abundance of IFMP for sockeye salmon, and is developing another for returning adults above which chinook salmon. These plans use biological benchmarks and targeted harvest is considered. A socio-economic factors to develop fishery reference points and limit reference point and an upper reference point define the decision rules to make harvest decisions. A similar table has boundaries for managing to formed in Area 25 Nootka where local chinook fishery plans are protect stock status. FRPs are in development. Habitat status reports have been completed for distinct from biological 15 key chinook watersheds along the West Coast of Vancouver benchmarks. Island (WCVI). Cowichan Watershed Health and Chinook Initiative (2010–): In the Cowichan Valley, First Nations and DFO have partnered with the municipal and provincial governments and local stakeholders to develop a salmon-focused community based initiative for watershed health. This initiative specifically recognizes chinook salmon as a key indicator species of ecosystem health. The result will be a strategic action plan with an emphasis on reducing risks to salmon production, and to achieve watershed health goals for hydrology, water quality, habitat, and the ecosystem/biological communities. Southern BC Chinook Strategic Planning Initiative (2013–): DFO and First Nations have led a multi-stakeholder process to address the declines in many southern chinook salmon populations. This initiative is testing the WSP five-step planning procedure. It will produce a high-level 38 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 210 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 strategic plan that includes trends in aggregated CU and habitat status, limiting factors and threats, objectives, and management strategies. The strategies are broad in scope (harvest, hatcheries, habitat, ecosystems, etc.), but will not prescribe specific management actions. 5.2.2 The IFMP Framework The Department’s IFMPs provide the overarching guidance for annual salmon fisheries management in the Pacific Region. WSP guidance has influenced the production of annual IFMPs in a number of ways, including: The scale of biological status assessment is now at the CU level. Associated fishery reference points and decision A Management Unit points might be at an aggregated CU scale (e.g., (MU) is a group of Management Units or MUs). For fishery structural reasons salmon populations must consider accessing aggregate sustainable yield in a combined for the safe manner in addition to diversity at the CU level. purposes of stock However, balancing socio-economic and conservation assessment and fisheries. factors may affect CUs within an MU differently. The WSP emphasizes the importance of a precautionary approach to resource management, including fisheries decision-making in the face of uncertainty (data analysis, environment) and poor biological status (setting of lower benchmarks). Habitat and ecosystem factors are now considered in fisheries management planning to a greater degree than in the past, particularly as they pertain to uncertainty in expected returns and the need to be precautionary in setting harvest levels. Consultations with First Nations on IFMP development have become more focused and rigorous in recent years. This is not solely because of the WSP but it is certainly consistent with its guiding principles and objectives. A new structure has been implemented for IFMPs in northern and southern BC, based on MUs. This new IFMP framework is easily adapted for consistency with WSP principles and can be applied at a local scale, as demonstrated by the Barkley Sound sockeye and chinook salmon plans. 5.2.3 Yukon First Nations Community Plans Under the Yukon FNFAs, communities are developing local salmon management plans that reflect community interests and circumstances. These plans bring together stock assessment, conservation, harvest management, and habitat restoration. Some examples are provided below. Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in (TH) is a self-governing Yukon First Nation whose name highlights the traditional importance of salmon harvest: Tr’ondëk refers to the confluence of the Klondike and Yukon Rivers, a place historically significant for harvesting chinook salmon. Hwëch’in means “people”. The TH Traditional Territory is located in central Yukon, with Dawson City providing the base for the TH Government and many TH citizens. Dawson is the first community above the US border where the run comprises all Canadian-origin Yukon River chinook stocks. Historically, TH has been reliant on Yukon River chinook salmon to provide for their subsistence harvesting needs since time immemorial. TH was involved in the Yukon River treaty negotiation and is active in implementing influential harvest management measures. In 2013, TH citizens passed a resolution to voluntarily withdraw from subsistence harvest for one life cycle, 39 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 211 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 in order to improve border escapement and allow more chinook salmon to reach their Canadian spawning grounds. TH is active in local harvest management programs such as reduction in mesh size, releasing females, and promoting harvest of alternative species such as chum salmon during this time of chinook conservation. Vuntut Gwitch’in First Nation (VGFN): VGFN is located in Old Crow on the Porcupine River, a large tributary to the Yukon River. Porcupine Fall chum stocks experienced a significant decline and are harvested in many mixed stock fisheries located downstream of the Canadian border. In 2016, the VGFN government expanded its fish management planning process to include US fishery managers and the community of Fort Yukon, AK, which fishes near the confluence of the two rivers. Already, this planning process has facilitated a better understanding of the issues between communities and potential measures for more effective conservation and harvest management. Placeholder: To be updated with further information regarding Yukon First Nations Community Plans following consultation. 5.2.4 Program delivery The WSP is one of a collection of policies and government directives that guide DFO’s planning and program delivery for fisheries management. Programs have developed annual work plans that align with the WSP and factor it into daily decisions about fisheries management. The fisheries continue to evolve with these policies: Harvest policies adopted in Barkley terminal fisheries as a result of the collaborative planning process; Ongoing research on interactions between farmed and wild salmon and the environmental impacts of aquaculture operations; Substantial research into topics such as farmed vs wild, juvenile marine, and the Salish Sea Marine Protection Plan which brought about in part by the redirection of “salmon stamp” funds from recreational fisheries to the Pacific Salmon Foundation; Functioning roundtables along the WCVI; Interior Fraser River coho precautionary closures until clearer evidence of rebuilding or stability; Southern BC chum reduced mixed stock harvest in Johnstone Strait is commensurate with lower productivity & lack of data. Increased focus on terminal fisheries; and Barkley sockeye variable harvest strategy and local integrated fisheries management plan developed strong integrated management through roundtables which has nurtured this fishery to be one of the most stable on the WCVI. The incorporation of CU data into key fisheries and habitat management decisions. 5.3 Challenges and Lessons Learned The experience from the WSP planning pilots has identified a number of lessons learned and factors for success that can be useful for future planning processes led by DFO and partners. 1. Integrated planning needs to happen at different scales and over different timeframes. Integrated planning can mean multi-stakeholder, multi-spatial, multi-temporal, and/or multi-risk planning. The pilots outlined above have demonstrated comprehensive planning at a number of 40 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 212 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 these scales. For example, pilots have been at geographic “Look at best practices, gaps scales ranging from a high-level regional perspective (i.e., and lessons learned from WSP Southern BC chinook) to the local watershed view (e.g., pilots to inform development of Cowichan and Barkley WCVI chinook strategic planning). In the implementation plan.” each case, the level at which the threats to wild salmon and Comment from the potential actions are assessed serves a different management 2016 WSP Consultations need. WSP principles and objectives will increasingly be the basis for annual operating plans (e.g., annual IFMPs and in-season decisions), as well as in multi-year strategic planning that combines fisheries management, habitat, enhancement, and ecosystem values. 2. There is no “one-size-fits-all” approach to planning under WSP guidance. Although many of the lessons learned from the pilots can be used in other areas, there is no one size fits all due to different scales, and different focuses of planning teams (lead agency and participants) and specific management objectives. For example, the focus of local planning may be on salmon harvest (e.g., Barkley Sound IFMPs), salmon production (Cowichan Watershed Plan), or fish protection as one of a number of watershed goals (e.g., community-led water management plans). The Yukon First Nations community-based fish plans are examples of planning initiatives at a targeted local level. 3. A comprehensive view should be taken of the role of wild salmon and threats to their health. Integrated planning aims to address the major pressures that limit or affect wild salmon status, especially those related to harvest, habitat, and hatcheries; in addition, the dual role of salmon as a keystone species and as an indicator species—i.e., of cumulative effects of environmental stressors across freshwater and marine habitats—needs to be emphasized. Other levels of government may not have the same commitment to the federal Wild Salmon Policy, but they readily grasp the broader importance of healthy salmon populations. 4. Collaboration and partnerships are crucial throughout the planning process. The pilots have shown that effective planning depends on bringing the right participants to the table, in terms of who is “First Nations, through their rights, knowledge, and most affected by salmon status (e.g., Indigenous people, involvement in assessment fishers, conservation groups) and who has management work, can play a leadership interest (government agencies, First Nations). This may be role in bringing parties to the done most efficiently by drawing on and supplementing table for integrated planning.” existing processes and structures, such as local watershed Comment from the roundtables. 2016 WSP Consultations First Nations, other partners, and stakeholders should be involved early on and throughout the planning process, including the setting of objectives and the development and evaluation of management strategies. 5. Each planning initiative should have a clear governance structure. It is important to have a Terms of Reference that identifies the planning participants, their roles and responsibilities, objectives, process, timelines, resources, and deliverables (e.g., as done for the WCVI roundtable). The Southern BC chinook WSP pilot has used a novel governance approach of a bilateral DFO/First Nations steering and planning committee with representatives 41 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 213 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 from the BC government, the commercial and sport fishing industries, and environmental and stewardship groups. 6. The planning process must be supported by sound science and technical capacity. Integrated planning needs science-based tools and expertise to help identify risk management options and evaluate trade-offs between different objectives (e.g., salmon conservation and What partners are doing: international cooperation examples The North Pacific Anadromous Fisheries Commission (NPAFC) was established by the Convention for the Conservation of Anadromous Stocks in the North Pacific Ocean, which took effect in 1993. NPAFC members, including Canada, the US, Japan, South Korea, and Russia, work together on scientific research and fisheries enforcement to promote the conservation of Pacific salmon and steelhead trout. Ongoing efforts include the development of an International Year of the Salmon initiative across the northern hemisphere. The Yukon River Panel, established in 2002 pursuant to Chapter 8 of the Pacific Salmon Treaty, serves as the international forum for Canada and the U.S. to collaborate on the conservation and management of Yukon River Salmon stocks. Chinook and fall chum salmon are the principle stocks of focus for the Panel, as these provide the foundation for significant subsistence, sport, domestic and commercial fisheries throughout the watershed. The Yukon River Panel also supports conservation, restoration and enhancement of Yukon River salmon and their habitats through the administration of the Yukon River Restoration and Enhancement Fund. harvest). The pilots have produced risk assessment models and other tools that have advanced the science on salmon and habitat status and threat evaluation. Technical support has focussed on biological science and should be augmented in other areas, such as socio-economic analysis and Aboriginal traditional knowledge. Generally, to be successful, there needs to be objective setting, sufficient data, analytical and interpretative capacity available to evaluate options, and ultimately rebuild and monitor CUs. All participants should be able to understand and provide input into the framing and technical analysis of management options. What partners are doing: habitat stewardship examples In 2006, the Cowichan Stewardship Roundtable coordinated a major habitat restoration project to stabilize the Stolz Bluff, which was releasing large amounts of sediment into the Cowichan River. This erosion had destroyed critical fish habitat and spawning grounds, threatening the survival of local chum, coho, and chinook salmon and steelhead. The project required the temporary diversion of a one-kilometer stretch of the river and the capture of 30,000 fish to install a larger berm structure to protect large clay bluffs from ongoing erosion. The results were a measureable decrease in suspended sediment, improved water quality, and improved biological productivity, including improved returns of salmon. The Cougar Creek Streamkeepers (CCS) have championed the construction of rain gardens in North Delta, to reduce pollution from stormwater discharges. These gardens filter and recycle rainwater from roofs, parking lots, etc. The municipality, CCS, schoolchildren, and volunteers build and maintain the gardens. 7. Implementing WSP will, at times, require trade-offs between different interests. The presence of salmon CUs in the Red zone will ultimately call for some difficult choices between conservation and other interests (e.g., harvest or development of industry). Consensus is desirable, but not always achievable. Under the Wild Salmon Policy, the Department has final authority for making management decisions that consider conservation and sustainable use and they should ensure decision-making processes are as transparent as possible. 8. Transparency means documenting how decisions were made at each stage of the process. 42 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 214 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 Integrated planning requires clear lines of communication between participants during the development of the plan, from the determination of objectives to the evaluation of management options. Moreover, the process needs to produce a transparent record of choices made along the way and their rationale, as well as of the scientific and technical aspects of decision-making. 9. Every planning process needs enough resources and practical timelines. The pilots have taken considerable time and resources for DFO scientists and managers, and for partners and stakeholders participating in the process. Each planning initiative must have a realistic funding strategy, an adequate commitment of DFO staff and participant time, willing partners, good governance, adequate knowledge and data, and a pragmatic schedule for conducting the work. Going forward, there may be opportunities to improve efficiency, e.g., by developing guidelines or templates for integrated planning. 10. Plans cannot succeed without support for implementation. DFO relies on partnerships to implement management actions for wild salmon and their habitats in areas where it does not “Effective integrated planning have sole jurisdictional authority. In particular, First Nations, also requires strong the Province of BC and local governments are key partners for legislation.” implementation in freshwater habitats and traditional Comment from the territories, respectively. The support of partners and 2016 WSP Consultations stewardship groups is also essential for monitoring salmon and habitat status and the effectiveness of management actions. 5.4 Priorities for the Next Five Years The Department has identified some key tasks for this Plan, to fill knowledge gaps and make progress on the WSP objectives. 5.4.1 Integrated Planning Priority determination – DFO should identify priorities for WSP implementation, and guide this work with lessons learned. While planning initiatives will always have case-specific features, a guidance document should help to streamline and inform the process. Decision support processes and tools – Further development work and transparency is needed on tools such as statistical/ simulation models for evaluating resource management options, e.g. the development of fishery reference points and decision rules that consider biological, socio-economic and indigenous factors for harvest management. Risk-based prioritization of CUs – The WSP specifies that CUs in the Red zone and those that could significantly limit fishing and other activities will be management priorities. DFO Fisheries Management should develop and implement a risk-based approach for prioritizing CUs for the purposes of biological status assessment and resource planning, as capacity permits. New integrated planning processes – To continue the evolution of strategic planning, the Department should lead new processes (e.g., new pilots) and provide WSP guidance for watershed planning roundtables led by others (e.g., watershed-based fish sustainability plans, water management plans), as resources allow. 43 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 215 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 Habitat and Ecosystem Integration – Focus on understanding and incorporating the habitat and ecosystem aspects of integrated management. 5.4.2 Program Delivery Implementation of existing strategic plans – DFO should work with existing IFMPs and other planning processes, management decisions and program activities, to ensure that actions in support of the WSP are considered in annual work plans for harvest, habitat management, enhancement, and ocean planning. Process for CUs in the Red and Amber zones – DFO has “There needs to be a received feedback that there is not a clear process for commitment to quicker action triggering action when CU status is assessed in the Red with respect to CUs that are in zone, or is at risk of falling into the Red zone from Amber. the Red zone and how to It would be helpful to document guidance on the approach prioritize.” to responding to CUs in the Red or Amber zone. Comment from the 2016 WSP Consultations These priorities are further detailed in the Activity Table that follows in Section 5.5 44 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 216 of 239 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 5.5 Activity Table This is just an initial list of activities identified by Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Additional activities will be incorporated throughout Fall 2017. WSP Key DFO Key Contact or Target Initiative Activity Status Objective Sector(s) Partners Web Link Date Region-wide a. Look for strategic opportunities to Fisheries integrate WSP objectives into Annually Management; ongoing planning, management and by March Ecosystem program activities, within existing 31 Management resources b. Clarify connections among CUs, 2.1 Improve Fisheries freshwater and marine ecosystems, To be integration of Management; Fishery Management Units, and confirmed WSP Science Outlook Units objectives c. Incorporate connections among into existing Fisheries Annually, CUs, freshwater and marine WSP planning Management; following ecosystems, Fishery Management Objective 3 – processes, Ecosystem completion Units, and Outlook Units into existing Manage program Management of scientific planning, management and program fisheries for activities, and review activities as appropriate sustainable management d. Include information regarding how benefits decisions for Annually, DFO considers CU status (i.e., red, Fisheries harvest, by IFMP amber, or green status) in integrated Management; habitat, completion planning processes and in the Science ecosystem, Page 217 of 239 date development of IFMPs enhancement, Fisheries Agenda Item # 10.4 and oceans e. Publish guidance outlining how March Management; management DFO responds to red status CUs 2022 Science Yukon Transboundary f. Improve incorporation of existing, Fisheries Annually available habitat and ecosystem status Management; by March information into Integrated Fisheries Science 31 45 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 WSP Key DFO Key Contact or Target Initiative Activity Status Objective Sector(s) Partners Web Link Date Management Plans Region-wide a. Develop fishery reference points and associated decision rules that Fisheries Ongoing consider biological and other factors Management 2.2 Develop for harvest management and/or b. Apply risk based approach for implement Fisheries identifying and prioritizing threats to approaches to Management; Annually, CUs during integrated planning, more Ecosystem as required management and program activities, explicitly Management as appropriate incorporate WSP c. Priority restoration activities assessments Ecosystem Objective 3 – informed by WSP objectives and Annually, of biological, Management Manage related integrated planning processes as required ecosystem, (FPP / SEP) fisheries for where appropriate and habitat sustainable South Coast status into benefits d. Develop options and recommended US existing actions through the Salish Sea Marine Scientists; planning Survival Project to address human Pacific December processes, Science www.psf.ca threats and biological limiting factors Salmon 2019 program affecting survival of chinook and Foundation activities, and coho in the Salish Sea (TBC) management decisions Yukon Transboundary e. Priority restoration activities Ecosystem Annually informed by WSP objectives and Management by March related integrated planning processes Page 218 of 239 (SEP) 31 where appropriate WSP 2.3 Continue Region-wide Agenda Item # 10.4 Objective 3 – to develop a. Support new and ongoing Manage and Annually integrated planning, management and Ecosystem fisheries for implement by March program activities to support WSP Management sustainable more targeted 31 objectives benefits approaches to 46 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 WSP Key DFO Key Contact or Target Initiative Activity Status Objective Sector(s) Partners Web Link Date WSP integrated planning, program Fisheries Annually b. Review and add to standards of activities, and Management; by March best practice based on lessons learned management Science 31 decisions, as resources allow Region-wide Fisheries a. Consider WSP priorities, guiding Management; Annually principles and objectives in annual Science; by March and multi-year work planning Ecosystem 31 processes. Management South Coast 2.4 Improve b. Develop local integrated fisheries the First Nations; management plans for key areas Fisheries integration of stakeholders including Barkley sockeye, WCVI Management; Ongoing WSP programs by (TBC) chinook, WCVI chum, inside chum Science Objective 3 – incorporating through local round tables. Manage priorities Fisheries fisheries for related to c. Incorporate WSP implementation Management; sustainable WSP priorities into integrated planning Science; To be benefits implementati initiatives aimed at addressing WSP Ecosystem confirmed on into work objectives (e.g., Barkley Sound Management Page 219 of 239 planning sockeye) processes (SEP) Yukon Transboundary Agenda Item # 10.4 d. Identify priorities for WSP implementation to guide annual and Fisheries multi-year work planning processes Management; by considering criteria that reflect the Science goal, guiding principles and objectives of the WSP 47 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 WSP Key DFO Key Contact or Target Initiative Activity Status Objective Sector(s) Partners Web Link Date 2.5 Improve Region-wide WSP integration of Objective 2 – WSP in a. Continue to support the Maintain Departmental consideration of the WSP when Ecosystem Ongoing, habitat and habitat- Ecosystem Management Branch Management as required ecosystem related makes regulatory decisions that may (FPP) integrity planning and affect wild Pacific salmon habitat decisions Region-wide a. Support improvements to First Nations fisheries governance Fisheries First Nations Ongoing processes aimed at facilitating Management (TBC) collaboration b. Promote incorporation of WSP Fisheries First Nations; implementation priorities into projects Management; partners; with First Nations, partners, and Science; Ongoing stakeholders 2.6 stakeholders Ecosystem (TBC) Strengthen Management collaboration WSP c. Continue to implement Fisheries with First Objective 3 – Monitoring and Catch Reporting Nations, Fisheries Manage Framework to promote risk-based Ongoing partners, and Management fisheries for standards and monitoring of programs stakeholders sustainable funded by harvesters to support benefits d. Explore opportunities to support WSP fisheries management activities that Fisheries Ongoing implementati would be beneficial to harvesters and Management Page 220 of 239 on support the WSP e. Engage First Nations, partners, and Agenda Item # 10.4 stakeholders at the local level to First Nations; Fisheries leverage First Nations' traditional partners; Management; Ongoing knowledge and local expertise and stakeholders Science gain understanding of habitat status or (TBC) other limiting factors of production f. First Nations Fisheries Council and Fisheries First Nations December 48 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 WSP Key DFO Key Contact or Target Initiative Activity Status Objective Sector(s) Partners Web Link Date DFO Science and Fisheries Management; Fisheries 2019 Management to collaborate to identify Science Council opportunities to better align scientific (TBC) monitoring activities with First Nations opportunities and priorities South Coast g. Support building First Nations capacity to take leadership role in implementing adult salmon Atlegay; monitoring in key rivers such as Cowichan Black Creek coho indicator with Tribes; Fisheries Atlegay Fisheries, Cowichan chinook Hupacasath; Management; Ongoing indicator with Cowichan Tribes, Tseshaht; Science Somass chinook and sockeye Maa-nulth; programs with Hupacasath and and others Tseshaht, Sakinaw with Sechelt, and (TBC) other extensive monitoring with local First Nations h. Continue integration through local Fisheries First Nations; round tables along the WCVI, Management; stakeholders Ongoing Cowichan, and other areas Science (TBC) Page 221 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 49 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 6. Performance Evaluation and Reporting 6.1 Past Performance Review 6.1.1 Gardner Pinfold Performance Review In 2011, Gardner Pinfold conducted an independent review of the Department’s performance in achieving the goal and objectives of the WSP (Gardner Pinfold 2011). This review found that the rationale for the policy remained solid, but that a detailed five year timetable of activities should be developed to complement the WSP. Other recommendations included a stronger departmental commitment to WSP funding; the identification by DFO of priority action steps; the target and use of resources strategically; the accountability for implementation of the WSP be given to a senior manager; and a strategic approach to consultation be adopted. The Gardner Pinfold report also suggested that annual work plan reviews should form “an integral part of WSP implementation and management,2”, and that results should be publically reported on DFO’s WSP webpage. 6.1.2 The Cohen Commission In October 2012, the final report of the Cohen Commission was released (Cohen 2012). The report made specific recommendations with respect to the WSP, including the need for a detailed implementation plan, dedicated funding to carry it out, and annual progress reporting on implementation. The Cohen Commission also called for the assessment of conservation units and the initiation of integrated strategic planning processes for Fraser River sockeye salmon. In August 2016, the Department issued an update on the implementation of the Cohen Commission’s recommendations (DFO 2016). This report confirmed DFO’s commitment to begin external consultations on a draft WSP Implementation Plan during 2016. Similar to the findings of the Gardner Pinfold review, the Cohen Commission called upon DFO to create a detailed implementation plan for WSP and to report on the progress made towards implementation. Recommendation 8 in the Cohen Commission calls upon DFO to report annually on progress made towards implementation of the policy, and to make this report publically available both in writing and on the DFO WSP webpage. 6.2 Performance Evaluation This WSP Implementation Plan represents a timetable of activities that are achievable within a five-year period. The results from a performance evaluation can guide decision-making, improve delivery of the initiative and enhance accountability not only during this time period, but also in informing next steps. A performance evaluation provides a status update of the implementation of planned activities and helps to identify what is and what is not working to encourage continuous improvement over time. This includes ensuring expected outcomes are being achieved and that lessons learned and possible alternative options are being identified. 2 Gardner Pinfold, Performance Review of the Wild Salmon Policy, 2011, pg. 31 50 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 222 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 Strategy 6 of the WSP, Performance Review, envisions two types of performance reviews associated with WSP implementation: annual post-season reviews of work plans at the program level and regular reviews of the broader success of the implementation of the WSP. Therefore, the activities in this Implementation Plan will be reviewed on an annual basis, while a more comprehensive review will occur at the end of the five year period to ensure broader success towards the goal of the WSP. As it is anticipated that there could be additional activities following the release of an updated Fisheries Act, this Implementation Plan will also have a mid- cycle review. DFO will be accountable for reporting against activities for which the Department is accountable and will seek input on status of externally led activities on an annual basis, with information made available also shared. 6.3 Reporting The need for public reporting has been outlined in the WSP, the Gardner Pinfold review, and the findings of the Cohen Commission. The Department is committed to 5 Year IP Begins reporting progress on its activities publicly in line with the Department’s regular business planning and reporting processes. Public reporting of progress made towards meeting the objectives of this Plan aligns with the Year 1 Government of Canada’s commitment to open government Reporting by fostering transparency, accountability, and engagement. Throughout this Plan, work being done by others is Year 2 included to showcase the varied efforts underway to Reporting conserve and restore wild salmon. For the purposes of accountability, DFO will be reporting out on activities being led by Fisheries and Oceans staff as captured in the Year 3 Mid- Activities Tables. Cycle Reporting Throughout consultations, the public has been anxious to know when the WSP will be fully implemented. As a policy, the WSP guides DFO’s work and as such there is Year 4 Reporting no specific end-date to the WSP or finishing the work. However, within the Policy are strategies for work which needs to be completed to get closer to the goals of the Year 5 Plan End WSP. Comprehensive Reporting 7. Looking Forward Through the development of this Plan and through reflection on past implementation efforts, DFO and partners have identified successes and opportunities for future work. Building on both, and identifying the work the remains ahead, will help inform the priorities of the Department moving forward as it continues to work with partners towards restoring and maintaining healthy and diverse salmon populations and their habitats for the benefit and enjoyment of the people of Canada. 51 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 223 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 Wild salmon are an iconic species in BC and Yukon, holding significant social, cultural, and economic value for Indigenous and non-Indigenous Canadians alike. The WSP recognizes the importance of wild Pacific salmon and this Implementation Plan represents DFO’s and others’ commitment to salmon conservation and restoration by setting out the activities that will be undertaken over the next five years to advance the goal and objectives of the WSP. 52 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 224 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 Annex A – Glossary Aboriginal rights: Practices, customs, and traditions that distinguish the unique culture of each First Nation. Aboriginal title: The right of First Nations to use their traditional lands and waters. Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge (ATK): A collection of knowledge, practice, and belief unique to indigenous people and passed down through generations. Aquaculture: The farming of aquatic organisms in the marine environment or freshwater. Basic Needs Level: The total number of harvestable salmon of a particular species negotiated in a Yukon First Nations Agreement as a harvest allocation to the First Nation in its Traditional Territory. Benchmark: A standard (quantified metric) against which habitat or population status can be measured or judged, and by which status can be compared over time and space to determine the risk of adverse effects. For instance, biological benchmarks demarcate zones of population status based on conservation and production considerations (Holt and Irvine 2013). Biodiversity or biological diversity: The full range of variety and variability within and among living organisms and the ecological complexes in which they occur; and encompass diversity at the ecosystem, community, species, and genetic levels and the interaction of these components. Biophysical: Biological and physical factors that influence ecological processes or events. Conservation: The protection, maintenance, and rehabilitation of genetic diversity, species, and ecosystems to sustain biodiversity and the continuance of evolutionary and natural production processes. Conservation Unit (CU): A group of wild salmon sufficiently isolated from other groups that, if extirpated, is very unlikely to recolonize naturally within an acceptable timeframe. COSEWIC: Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Cumulative effects or cumulative impacts: Changes to environmental, social and economic values caused by the combined effect of past to present activities and events. Within a WSP context, status changes to wild salmon conservation units and the ecosystem units required to sustain them are key cumulative effects indicators. Diversity (of salmon): The genetic variation and adaptations to different environments that have accumulated between populations of salmon (defined by the 2005 Wild Salmon Policy). Ecosystem: A community of organisms plus physical and chemical conditions of their environment interacting as an ecological unit. Ecosystem integrity: The physical, chemical and biological structure and processes that characterize specific ecosystems. 53 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 225 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 Ecosystem values: Attributes or properties of ecosystems that society wishes to sustain. Freshwater ecosystem integrity, salmon biodiversity and sustainable fisheries for salmon are examples of ecosystem values within a WSP context. Enhancement: The application of biological and technical knowledge and capabilities to increase the productivity of fish stocks. It may be achieved by altering habitat attributes (e.g., habitat restoration) or by using fish culture techniques (e.g., hatcheries, spawning channels). In the context of the WSP, only salmon originating directly from hatcheries and managed spawning channels will be considered enhanced. Escapement: The number of mature salmon that pass through (or escape) fisheries and return to fresh water to spawn. Estuarine staging area: An ecosystem unit used as a transitional area in which either juvenile salmon migrating seaward, or adult salmon migrating landward, may aggregate or “stage” for a variable interval to adjust physiologically to the sharp differences in the chemical composition of fresh versus marine waters before resuming active migration. Fish habitat: Spawning grounds and any other areas, including nursery, rearing, food supply and migration areas, on which fish depend directly or indirectly in order to carry out their life processes. Fishery Reference Point (FRP): A point at which management actions occur. An example is the abundance of returning adults above which targeted harvest is considered. A limit reference point and an upper reference point define the boundaries for managing to protect stock status. FRPs are distinct from biological benchmarks. Genetic diversity: The variation at the level of individual genes, and provides a mechanism for populations to adapt to their ever-changing environment. It refers to the differences in genetic make- up among distinct species and to genetic variations within a single species. Habitat restoration: Physical or chemical manipulations to create a natural or normative reference state of habitat that has been altered, disrupted, or degraded. Successful restoration increases the capability of previously damaged habitat to sustain fish production. Integrated Fisheries Management Plans (IFMPs): Integrated Fisheries Management Plans are used by DFO to guide the conservation and sustainable use of marine resources. An IFMP is developed to manage the fishery of a particular species in a given region. IFMPs combine the best available science on a species with industry data on capacity and methods for harvesting that species. Extensive monitoring approaches: Simple sets of a few attributes of a given subject and/or its surroundings are identified and used to provide a synoptic assessment of the status or trends exhibited by the subject in space or time. In a WSP context, this involves annual monitoring of a limited number of attributes (e.g. catch and/or escapement) of many CUs and how these vary over space and time. 54 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 226 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 Intensive monitoring approaches: Complex sets of many attributes of a given subject and/or its surroundings are identified and quantified in order to advance knowledge and/or develop indicators for prediction or explanation of cause and effect interactions. In a WSP context, this involves seasonal to annual monitoring of suites of attributes of a given salmon CU (e.g. individual and population level biological traits) as well as associated EU attributes (e.g. physical, chemical and ecological properties of the environment of a given CU) and how these vary in space and time. Keystone species: A keystone species is a species that has a disproportionately large effect on its environment relative to its abundance. Such species are described as playing a critical role in maintaining the structure of an ecological community, affecting many other organisms in an ecosystem and helping to determine the types and numbers of various other species in the community. Pacific salmon are regarded as keystone species due to their disproportionate impact as sources of food and nutrients that demonstrably limit the distribution and abundance of a wide range of both plant and animal species in freshwater and associated terrestrial ecosystems. Limiting factors: Physical, chemical or biological factors that control ecological or life history event and process outcomes. Lower benchmark: A reference point in biological status associated with significant losses in production between the Amber and Red zones, and which allows for a substantial buffer between it and any level of abundance that could lead to a CU being considered at risk of extinction by COSEWIC. Management Unit (MU): A group of salmon populations combined for the purposes of stock assessment and fisheries. Marine adaptive zones: The unique combination of marine ecosystem units to which each wild salmon CU is assumed to have accumulated specific adaptations over evolutionary time. Metric: A quantifiable measure. Multi-scalar: Literally many scales that characterize systems of spatial or temporal measurement. For example the life history stages of Pacific salmon occupy multi-scalar spaces and temporal intervals. These may be measured at a scale of cm to m and days to months with respect to egg incubation in gravel spawning areas. Alternately the physical length and elapsed intervals for adult migration through freshwater and the open ocean involve measures at scales up to thousands of km and years of time. Multi-trophic: A trophic level is a functional classification of organisms in a community according to feeding relationships. Ecosystems contain multiple trophic levels consisting of plants, grazers, predators, scavengers etc. Pacific salmon: Salmon of the Pacific Ocean regions, of which there are currently eleven species recognized in the Genus Oncorhynchus. The five species addressed in this policy are sockeye 55 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 227 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 (Oncorhynchus nerka), pink (O. gorbuscha), chum (O. keta), coho (O. kisutch) and chinook (O. tshawytscha). Also in BC are steelhead (O. mykiss) and cutthroat trout (O. clarki). The remaining species include the masu (Asian distribution, O. masou), Mexican golden trout (O. chrysogaster), apache trout (O. apache), and gila trout (O. gilae). These latter three species have limited distributions in the western U.S. and northern Mexico. Population: A group of interbreeding organisms that is relatively isolated (i.e. demographically uncoupled) from other such groups and is likely adapted to the local habitat. Precautionary approach: When used in an advisory context in support of decision-making by the Government of Canada, this term conveys the sense that the advice is provided in situations of high scientific uncertainty. It is intended to promote actions that would result in a low probability of harm that is serious or difficult to reverse. Predator-scavenger complex (PSC): An ecological community consisting of many species of animals that obtain a significant portion of their seasonal to annual food requirements by killing or scavenging and then eating a common species. In British Columbia the salmon PSC comprises at least 23 species of mammals and birds that consume adult fish returning to British Columbia rivers and streams. Productivity: A measure of the amount of energy (or material) formed by an individual population or community in a specific amount of time. Within a WSP context, some common measures of productivity include the number of fry, smolts or subsequent adults (i.e. recruits) produced on average per spawning adult of the previous generation. Recruits per spawner: The number of adult recruits (i.e. salmon that survive to become adults, which includes spawners and catch) produced per spawner, typically organized by brood (spawning) year. Resource management: Departmental actions, policies and programs affecting wild Pacific salmon directly or indirectly through their habitats and ecosystems. Returns: Total number of adults returning to freshwater to spawn in a given year, including those caught in fisheries. Riparian zone and functions: The area of vegetation near streams is known as the riparian zone. Riparian function includes the interaction of hydrologic, geomorphic, and biotic processes within the riparian environment that determine the character of the riparian zone and the influences exerted on the adjacent aquatic and terrestrial environments (e.g., temperature controls, shading, large woody debris). Salmonid: A group of fish that includes salmon, trout, and char, belonging to the taxonomic Family Salmonidae. Selective fishing: A conservation-based management approach that allows for the harvest of surplus target species while aiming to minimize or avoid the harvest of species or stocks of concern or to release bycatch unharmed. 56 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 228 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft WSP Five Year Implementation Plan Initial Draft for Consultations – Fall 2017 Smolt: A juvenile salmon enroute to the marine environment. A smolt becomes physiologically capable of balancing salt and water in the estuary and ocean waters. Smolts vary in size and age depending on their species. Spatial and temporal scales: Graduated systems of units or scales (e.g. cm, m, km, hours, days, years, centuries etc.) employed to measure spatial or temporal dimensions of objects, events and processes. Species: The fundamental category of taxonomic classification consisting of organisms grouped by virtue of their common attributes and capable of interbreeding. A taxonomic species is equivalent to the term “species” but the phrase may be used to indicate the collective species throughout its distribution. Stewardship: Acting responsibly to conserve fish and their habitat for present and future generations. Stock assessment: The use of various statistical and mathematical calculations to make quantitative predictions about the reactions of fish populations to alternative management choices. Stock-recruitment relationship: The number of adult salmon (recruits) produced for a given spawner abundance. Sustainable Use and Benefit: The use of resources in a way and at a rate that does not lead to their long-term decline, thereby maintaining the potential for future generations to meet their needs and aspirations. Sustainable use refers to consumptive uses of biological resources. Sustainable benefits, on the other hand, derive from a broader range of consumptive and non-consumptive resource uses. Total Allowable Catch (TAC): In the Yukon, TAC means the number of salmon of a particular species in a given drainage basin that return to Canadian waters and are deemed not necessary for conservation. Terminal fisheries: Fisheries that occur near or in fresh water (e.g., at a river’s mouth) where the targeted species or stock has returned to spawn. Treaty rights: Aboriginal rights set out in a treaty and constitutionally protected. Upper (or higher) benchmark: A reference point in biological status associated with harvests at the level expected to provide, on an average annual basis, the maximum catch for a CU, given existing environmental conditions. Wild salmon: Salmon are considered “wild” if they have spent their entire life cycle in the wild and originate from parents that were also produced by natural spawning and continuously lived in the wild. 57 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 229 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 230 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft 2018-2022 Wild Salmon Policy Implementation Plan Workbook DRAFT 2018-2022 Wild Salmon Policy Implementation Plan Workbook Fall Consultations 2017 1 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 231 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Fisheries and Oceans Pêches et Océans Canada Canada Pacific Region Région du Pacifique Suite 200 – 401Draft Burrard 2018 Street-2022 Wild SalmonPiéce 200 Policy – 401 rue Implementation Burrard Plan Workbook Vancouver, British Columbia Vancouver C.-B. V6C 3S4 V6C 3S4 September 29, 2017 Thank you for your interest in the Draft 2018-2022 Wild Salmon Policy Implementation Plan – For Consultations. We are pleased to share a copy of this draft plan for your feedback and are looking forward to having thoughtful discussions during the months ahead as we work to finalize this plan. As you know, since 2005, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) has used Canada’s Policy for Conservation of Wild Pacific Salmon (commonly referred to as the Wild Salmon Policy or WSP) to guide wild Pacific Salmon-related work on a day-to-day basis. At the same time, First Nations, provincial and territorial partners, and stakeholders have also undertaken important work that supports the goal and objectives of the WSP. We know that there is an appetite for a detailed plan beyond the action steps listed in the WSP, and following a series of broad engagement sessions between October 2016 and March 2017, DFO received advice and information from First Nations, partners, and stakeholders to develop this initial draft. This draft implementation plan outlines DFO’s planned work over the next five years— from 2018-2022—that supports Pacific wild salmon and salmon habitat conservation across BC and Yukon. It also highlights some of the many ongoing contributions other groups make in support of Pacific wild salmon. But it remains a work in progress, and throughout fall 2017 we hope to get your feedback on the document at one of our consultation sessions or electronically at [email protected]. As you read through the draft plan, keep an eye out for elements you think could use more elaboration, or where things might not be as clear or accurate as they could be. Think about projects you know about or are involved in that are planned for 2018-2022 that will add to the planned activities already included. DFO recognizes that achieving the goal of the WSP requires collaborating with others and the goal of having a robust implementation plan is no different. With your support we can build an even stronger implementation plan with the ultimate goal of restoring and maintaining healthy Pacific salmon populations for generations to come. Thank you and I look forward to the opportunity for further discussion through the fall consultation sessions. For more information on the fall consultations please visit http://www.pac.dfo- mpo.gc.ca/consultation/wsp-pss/index-eng.html). Rebecca Reid Regional Director General Pacific Region 2 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 232 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft 2018-2022 Wild Salmon Policy Implementation Plan Workbook Thank you for your interest in the Draft 2018-2022 Wild Salmon Policy Implementation Plan – for Consultations. Please help us improve the initial plan by giving us your feedback on any or all of the following questions. Where possible, please include the Draft Implementation Plan page number. 1. Introduction (p. 5-8) a. Is the information clear and accurate? If not, please outline specific areas that require clarification or correction. ______ b. What, if any, additional information would you like us to elaborate on or consider including? ______ 2. Context of WSP Implementation Plan (p. 9-17) a. Is the information clear and accurate? If not, please outline specific areas that require clarification or correction. ______ b. What, if any, additional information would you like us to elaborate on or consider including? ______ 3 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 233 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft 2018-2022 Wild Salmon Policy Implementation Plan Workbook 3. Overview of the Implementation Plan (p. 18-20) a. Is the information clear and accurate? If not, please outline specific areas that require clarification or correction. ______ b. What, if any, additional information would you like us to elaborate on or consider including? ______ 4. Implementation Theme 1: Assessment Work (p. 21-29) a. Is the information clear and accurate? If not, please outline specific areas that require clarification or correction. ______ b. What, if any, additional information would you like us to elaborate on or consider including? ______ 4 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 234 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft 2018-2022 Wild Salmon Policy Implementation Plan Workbook c. What are your perspectives on priority assessment work for the next five years and in the longer term? Next 5 Years: ______ Longer Term: ______ 4.5 Activity Table (Assessment Work) (p.30-35) a. Is the information clear and accurate? If not, please outline specific areas that require clarification or correction. ______ b. What, if any, additional information would you like us to elaborate on or consider including? ______ c. What activities are you aware of or involved in that are planned for 2018-2022 that will add to the planned activities in this draft document? ______ 5 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 235 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft 2018-2022 Wild Salmon Policy Implementation Plan Workbook d. What are potential opportunities for collaboration on salmon assessment activities? ______ 5. Implementation Theme 2: Integrated Planning and Program Delivery (p. 36- 44) a. Is the information clear and accurate? If not, please outline specific areas that require clarification or correction. ______ b. What, if any, additional information would you like us to elaborate on or consider including? ______ c. What are your perspectives on priority integrated planning work for the next five years or in the longer term? ______ 6 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 236 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft 2018-2022 Wild Salmon Policy Implementation Plan Workbook 5.5 Activity Table (Integrated Planning and Program Delivery) (p.45-49) a. Is the information clear and accurate? If not, please outline specific areas that require clarification or correction. ______ b. What, if any, additional information would you like us to elaborate on or consider including? ______ c. What activities are you aware of or involved in that are planned for 2018-2022 that will add to planned activities in this draft document? ______ d. What are potential opportunities for collaboration on salmon integrated planning or program delivery activities? ______ 7 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 237 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.4 Draft 2018-2022 Wild Salmon Policy Implementation Plan Workbook 6. Performance Evaluation and Reporting (p. 50-52) a. What information would you want to see reported on as part of the WSP implementation? ______ b. What format do you feel is most effective for reporting on the progress of implementation? ______ Anything further you would like to add or comment on? ______ Please give your completed Workbook to a DFO staff member or submit your answers electronically at www.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/consultation/wsp-psss/index- eng.html. You can also email any comments or questions regarding the draft Implementation Plan to [email protected] by December 15, 2017. Thank you for your feedback! 8 DRAFT WILD SALMON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 238 of 239 Agenda Item # 10.5 b15a -2e Bulkley Valley Economic Development Association v r'iilÌrli'{tf .t()î,.ix r,ì, t..\í; \/t)).!i..:t) 1i-:t ?sil n4;i..¡155 Wwu¿bveCja.C¿¡ "/¿'i.1. November 28,2017 mEGHilvE[m NOl/ 3 t ?ü1? Town of Smithers Tq$,n o{ firniêhers P.O. Box 879 Smithers, B.C. VOJ 2NO Attn: Mayor and Council Dear Sirs and Mesdames: It is with some regret that I am resigning as Chair and Director of the Bulkley Valley Economic Development Association (BVEDA). My resignation will be effective January I,2018 to coincide with the completion of the BVEDAs contractual obligations to its funders. It has been a great honour to serve on this Board and I am proud of its many accomplishments. The BVEDAhas served the Bulkley Valley by initiating programs and providing economic development expertise. It is a unique organization that has worked solely in the public's interest to promote and facilitate economic development throughout the Bulkley Valley. The BVEDAhas been a vital resource to investors, expanding businesses, business start-ups, and people who are interested in researching, exploring, and developing business opportunities. The BVEDA s ability to support a diverse range of businesses and economic opportunities has been its biggest strength. UnfortunatelS the loss of its core funding means the BVEDAwill not be able to continue its operations past this year. I am thankful for the opportunity to serve in this important role. Sean Chair cc: Allan Stroet Mark Fisher CAO n DiriDs D DiIFiN T] Agen Date Dir/CS fl DirrWO Ll Biclg lns L l ln-Carr'Drle: Admin Asst. ll Fire D Planner tl Agenda Plac..nr *nt Rec. Coord. ¿Ç61ff_ n Air Mgr D PCSO I:] Other: BVEDA - ROWELL RESIGNATION Page 239 of 239 ._ .¡¿ ã* a a = .út -c oË.g= ioF"l42 qg o o f _ o o gE = ËEäfi z;3 U' := oc-o ;q F E Ø E Ø E 0) 6 sq€Ë Ë; 99 õ Ëe ol Eç 3 c -c c gE 6E o> o) o o'l t O-c- Ì ã_;:eË F- f E-E(! sÈ p rv-e U' o õE ¡ åË: åË Ø õì o 3E o =Eõ.F L Ѐ Hs Ë ä€ Eës Eb o õg a Ip¡b¡;O-c)ø(E= o)- trø¡(U(¡ !=.= o E * E þË Ë g ìE) =c -ro oL o'à o 19 ør o) ;: Ë äÈ aD'- f E giE q Þ: åE 35 F = tõ Ë \^e (U- ËË fìï <¡ c Ø 5 ã ð I PÞ (EË o c. q* o. o 6) "l I e èÈ x ËËå!Ë o -c - c\. o. Ê 3ä o tr .h r'tç o (¡) Ë¡s E F 9PE-q= .å; o o i E oa.o gËãË*ËË Ê z L E o gË ã åËEËg =Ëe at, E Ëe=Eþo-c: $ F o Ë ;q at: o o Ë 3':E 3.3 .(n í o .o o*38 FËt i f)- (õ ¡Eþ-eõ c) r! È rE C õ Ë 3=tPÞ EE:ä:b= õa J o c 0= ËiE¡ åt o õh tr €õõa = E=ËEg+ t o (E õ+ Lo o .sË 5à EHÉÈEE :ËËE +ã L c¡ o o- tr=oØQÉ 3 pa 8ó (E = o)ø.c,cIlã Ëiå: ; Ë È^àî s L -iEE (E -Oc o : ã: H t =; -î E g o LÈolY o, ËEë H Ë Ë¡;EËg -(Eõo) q (5 oÈr o c i o ø j9 s'=È P Ë I äË Ë * O'F= ø.8ì ño_ .= o^c- .tt Oçt-¿ritr -c ct) Ê O' O-c; E.c=o, .D ='-YE C .1t, ?4vt o ! ár.- Ë E Ëä Ë o=(\.= 'õ.? o ut .tt : Q) eÈË:=Ë -c ;0)s rD (E O-.: - 9l o¡ Ë! ae 5 s e Ë .Y ì fl o di o! o e.ãç P PE C') .c e P= Þ P5g 5c¡ ! È ; sE e *E 8I ð !€ cD'= 5 õ b cÈ È ogg; g.r*ËgF 3.õ Éaeà €Ë m =Ë" l Ê o E'€'õ 'Ë.õ f \t = .Y o c o =(t, ! ah o. U)o Lo o q o o .o ¿ o o o =o .= th t¡ -o É 'õC g ì o (¡) o L 0) o õ o o o) :E C C. c I c C 0) .o o ñ tc co co co $ co c¡ .9 c z .c (, +¡ 0) =f o ,'E ll È oL ._E ! õ an o o ¿í, A o 3 U' .c (¡) o c c o o È ñ ! x l- 6)