Portable DVD/CD Player DVD-LS85

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Portable DVD/CD Player DVD-LS85 p1 e.fm Page 1 Monday, March 28, 2005 7:12 PM Operating Instructions Portable DVD/CD Player Model No. DVD-LS90 DVD-LS85 Dear customer MULTI-FORMAT PLAYBACK Thank you for purchasing this product. DVD-RAM For optimum performance and safety, please recorded with DVD video recorders etc. read these instructions carefully. Video & Still pictures (JPEG) Before connecting, operating or adjusting this product, please read the instructions completely. DVD-RW (DVD-VR) Please keep this manual for future reference. recorded and finalized with DVD video recorders etc. Region number DVD-Video/Video CD/CD The player plays DVD-Video marked with labels sold on the market containing the region number or “ALL”. Movie, Music etc. Region Number DVD-R/DVD-RW/+R/+RW For the United Kingdom and recorded and finalized with DVD video recorders etc. 2 Continental Europe Video (played as DVD-Video) For Asia 3 CD-R/CD-RW Example: For the United Kingdom and recorded and finalized with personal computers etc. Continental Europe Music (WMA/MP3) & Still pictures (JPEG) 2 3 See page 5 for details. 2 ALL 5 Operations in these instructions are described [DVD-LS85] mainly with the main unit, but you can do the operations on the remote control if the remote Car DC Adaptor is not included. controls are the same (➜ Back cover) [Note] “EB” on the packaging indicates the United Kingdom. EB EG GCS RQT8071-B P2-32 e.fm Page 2 Monday, March 28, 2005 7:09 PM Caution for AC Mains Lead (For United Kingdom) 1. Open the fuse cover with a screwdriver. (“EB” area code model only) Figure A For your safety, please read the following text carefully. This appliance is supplied with a moulded three pin mains plug for your safety and convenience. A 5-ampere fuse is fitted in this plug. Should the fuse need to be replaced please ensure that the replacement fuse has a rating of 5-ampere and that it is approved by ASTA or BSI to BS1362. Check for the ASTA mark Ï or the BSI mark Ì on the body of the fuse. If the plug contains a removable fuse cover you must ensure that it is refitted when the fuse is replaced. If you lose the fuse cover the plug must not be Figure B Fuse cover used until a replacement cover is obtained. A replacement fuse cover can be purchased from your local dealer. CAUTION! IF THE FITTED MOULDED PLUG IS 2. Replace the fuse and close or attach the fuse UNSUITABLE FOR THE SOCKET OUTLET cover. IN YOUR HOME THEN THE FUSE SHOULD BE REMOVED AND THE PLUG Figure A CUT OFF AND DISPOSED OF SAFELY. THERE IS A DANGER OF SEVERE ELECTRICAL SHOCK IF THE CUT OFF Fuse PLUG IS INSERTED INTO ANY 13-AMPERE (5 ampere) SOCKET. Figure B If a new plug is to be fitted please observe the Caution for AC Mains Lead Mains AC Caution for wiring code as stated below. Fuse If in any doubt please consult a qualified electrician. (5 ampere) IMPORTANT The wires in this mains lead are coloured in accordance with the following code: Blue: Neutral, Brown: Live. As these colours may not correspond with the coloured markings identifying the terminals in your plug, proceed as follows: The wire which is coloured Blue must be connected to the terminal which is marked with the letter N or coloured Black or Blue. The wire which is coloured Brown must be connected to the terminal which is marked with the letter L or coloured Brown or Red. WARNING: WARNING: DO NOT CONNECT EITHER TO REDUCE THE RISK OF FIRE, ELECTRIC WIRE TO THE EARTH TERMINAL SHOCK OR PRODUCT DAMAGE, DO NOT WHICH IS MARKED WITH THE LETTER EXPOSE THIS APPARATUS TO RAIN, E, BY THE EARTH SYMBOL Ó OR MOISTURE, DRIPPING OR SPLASHING COLOURED GREEN OR GREEN/ AND THAT NO OBJECTS FILLED WITH LIQUIDS, SUCH AS VASES, SHALL BE YELLOW. PLACED ON THE APPARATUS. THIS PLUG IS NOT WATERPROOF— KEEP DRY. WARNING: The driver must not operate this unit while Before use the vehicle is moving. Remove the connector cover. Do not operate this unit where it can be How to replace the fuse viewed by the driver. The location of the fuse differ according to the Driver operation or viewing of this unit type of AC mains plug (figures A and B). Confirm while the vehicle is moving will cause the AC mains plug fitted and follow the distraction which may result in serious instructions below. accident and personal injury or property Illustrations may differ from actual AC mains plug. 2 damage. RQT8071 P2-32 e.fm Page 3 Monday, March 28, 2005 7:09 PM CAUTION! Table of contents ≥ DO NOT INSTALL OR PLACE THIS UNIT IN A BOOKCASE, BUILT-IN CABINET OR Caution for AC Mains Lead . 2 IN ANOTHER CONFINED SPACE. Precautions . 4 ENSURE THE UNIT IS WELL Accessories . 5 VENTILATED. TO PREVENT RISK OF Discs that can be played . 5 ELECTRIC SHOCK OR FIRE HAZARD Preparations DUE TO OVERHEATING, ENSURE THAT CURTAINS AND ANY OTHER MATERIALS 1 Attaching the battery. 6 DO NOT OBSTRUCT THE VENTILATION 2 Recharging the battery . 6 VENTS. 3 The remote control . 7 ≥ DO NOT OBSTRUCT THE UNIT’S 4 Adjusting the LCD angle . 7 VENTILATION OPENINGS WITH NEWSPAPERS, TABLECLOTHS, CURTAINS, AND SIMILAR ITEMS. Play. 8 ≥ DO NOT PLACE SOURCES OF NAKED FLAMES, SUCH AS LIGHTED CANDLES, Useful functions . 10 ON THE UNIT. ≥ DISPOSE OF BATTERIES IN AN Enjoying higher quality ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY MANNER. audio and video . 12 Program/Random play . 13 CAUTION! Playing data discs. 14 THIS PRODUCT UTILIZES A LASER. Playing HighMATTM discs . 15 USE OF CONTROLS OR ADJUSTMENTS Playing programs/playlists of contents Table OR PERFORMANCE OF PROCEDURES on RAM/DVD-RW (DVD-VR) OTHER THAN THOSE SPECIFIED HEREIN discs . 15 MAY RESULT IN HAZARDOUS RADIATION Playing CD . 15 EXPOSURE. Using On-Screen Menus. 16 DO NOT OPEN COVERS AND DO NOT REPAIR YOURSELF. REFER SERVICING TO Changing the player settings. 18 QUALIFIED PERSONNEL. Using this unit with other equipment. 20 CAUTION! When Using in a car . 21 DANGER OF EXPLOSION IF BATTERY IS INCORRECTLY REPLACED. Frequently asked questions. 22 Tips for making WMA/MP3 REPLACE ONLY WITH THE SAME OR and JPEG discs EQUIVALENT TYPE RECOMMENDED BY (For CD-R/CD-RW) . 22 THE MANUFACTURER. DISCARD USED BATTERIES ACCORDING TO THE Specifications . 23 MANUFACTURER’S INSTRUCTIONS. Troubleshooting guide . 24 Maintenance . 27 AC adaptor Main feature index. .Back cover This AC adaptor operates on AC between 100 V and 240 V. But ≥ Obtain a suitable plug adaptor if the plug Do not rest the unit on your lap for a long does not fit the AC mains socket. time while using it. The unit can become hot and cause burns. The socket outlet shall be installed near the equipment and easily accessible or the mains To prevent damage plug or an appliance coupler shall remain Avoid the following: readily operable. ≥ Spraying flammable insecticides near the unit. This product may receive radio interference ≥ Pressing the LCD. caused by mobile telephones during use. If ≥ Touching the lens and other parts of the such interference is apparent, please increase laser pickup. separation between the product and the Do not use the unit in the following places: mobile telephone. ≥ Sandy places such as beaches. ≥ On top of cushions, sofas, or hot Marking sign is located on bottom of the unit. equipment such as amplifiers. Do not leave in an unventilated automobile or exposed to direct sunlight and high temperatures. 3 RQT8071 P2-32 e.fm Page 4 Monday, March 28, 2005 7:09 PM Precautions .Batteries Read these operating instructions carefully 1. Battery pack (Lithium ion battery pack) before using the unit. Follow the safety instructions on the unit and the applicable safety ≥Use this unit to recharge the battery pack. instructions listed below. Keep these operating ≥Do not use the battery pack with instructions handy for future reference. equipment other than the specified player. ≥Do not use the player outside if it is 1) Read these instructions. snowing or raining. (The battery pack is 2) Keep these instructions. not waterproof.) 3) Heed all warnings. ≥Do not get dirt, sand, liquids, or other 4) Follow all instructions. foreign matter on the terminals. 5) Do not use this apparatus near water. ≥Do not touch the plug terminals (i and 6) Clean only with dry cloth. j) with metal objects. 7) Do not block any ventilation openings. ≥Do not disassemble, remodel, heat or Install in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. throw into fire. 8) Do not install near any heat sources such as ≥Do not store the battery pack in radiators, heat registers, stoves, or other apparatus (including amplifiers) that produce heat. temperature over 60 oC. 9) Protect the AC mains lead from being walked on or 2. Button-type battery (Lithium battery) ≥Insert with poles aligned. Precautions pinched particularly at plugs, convenience receptacles, and the point where they exit from the ≥Do not touch the terminals (i and j) apparatus. with metal objects. 10)Only use attachments/accessories specified by ≥Do not disassemble, remodel, heat or the manufacturer. throw into fire. 11)Use only with the cart, stand, ≥Keep out of reach of children tripod, bracket, or table specified If any electrolyte should come into contact by the manufacturer, or sold with with your hands or clothes, wash it off the apparatus. When a cart is thoroughly with water. used, use caution when moving If any electrolyte should come into contact the cart/apparatus combination with your eyes, never rub the eyes. to avoid injury from tip-over.
Recommended publications
  • The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya: Manga V
    THE MELANCHOLY OF HARUHI SUZUMIYA: MANGA V. 17 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Nagaru Tanigawa,Gaku Tsugano,Noizi Ito | 176 pages | 17 Dec 2013 | Little, Brown & Company | 9780316322348 | English | New York, United States The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya: Manga v. 17 PDF Book The two series were streamed in Japanese and with English subtitles on Kadokawa's YouTube channel between February 13 and May 15, Character Family see all. Chad rated it liked it Nov 10, Essential We use cookies to provide our services , for example, to keep track of items stored in your shopping basket, prevent fraudulent activity, improve the security of our services, keep track of your specific preferences e. While Haruhi is the central character to the plot, the story is told from the point of view of Kyon , one of Haruhi's classmates. Retrieved February 26, On April 17, Yen Press announced that they had acquired the license for the North American release of the first four volumes of the second manga series, promising the manga would not be censored. September 25, August 21, [10] [35]. No trivia or quizzes yet. The "next episode" previews feature two different episode numberings: one number from Haruhi, who numbers the episodes in chronological order, and one number from Kyon, who numbered them in broadcast order. Nagaru Tanigawa is a Japanese author best known for The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya for which he won the grand prize at the eighth annual Sneaker Awards. November 21, [41]. Era see all. Nineteen Eighty-four by George Orwell Paperback, 4. Retrieved April 14, The series has been licensed by Bandai Entertainment and has been dubbed by Bang Zoom! An omnibus of three anthologies containing short stories from several different manga artists.
    [Show full text]
  • 08-1448 Brown V. Entertainment Merchants Assn. (06/27/2011)
    (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2010 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus BROWN, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. v. ENTERTAINMENT MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No. 08–1448. Argued November 2, 2010—Decided June 27, 2011 Respondents, representing the video-game and software industries, filed a preenforcement challenge to a California law that restricts the sale or rental of violent video games to minors. The Federal District Court concluded that the Act violated the First Amendment and permanently enjoined its enforcement. The Ninth Circuit affirmed. Held: The Act does not comport with the First Amendment. Pp. 2–18. (a) Video games qualify for First Amendment protection. Like pro- tected books, plays, and movies, they communicate ideas through fa- miliar literary devices and features distinctive to the medium. And “the basic principles of freedom of speech . do not vary” with a new and different communication medium. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wil- son, 343 U. S. 495, 503. The most basic principle—that government lacks the power to restrict expression because of its message, ideas, subject matter, or content, Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Un- ion, 535 U.
    [Show full text]
  • United Kingdom in Re Struthers and Others V. Japan
    REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES Anglo-Japanese Property Commission established pursuant to the Agreement concluded between the Allied Powers and the Government of Japan on 12 June 1952 Decision of 30 November 1960 in the case United Kingdom in re Struthers and others v. Japan Commission anglo-japonaise des biens, établie en vertu de l’Accord conclu entre les Puissances Alliées et le gouvernement du Japon le 12 juin 1952 Décision du 30 novembre 1960 dans l’affaire Royaume-Uni in re Struthers et al. c. Japon 30 November 1960 VOLUME XXIX, pp.513-519 NATIONS UNIES - UNITED NATIONS Copyright (c) 2012 PART XXIII Anglo-Japanese Property Commission established pursuant to the Agreement concluded between the Allied Powers and the Government of Japan on 12 June 1952 Commission anglo-japonaise des biens, établie en vertu de l’Accord conclu entre les Puissances Alliées et le gouvernement du Japon le 12 juin 1952 Anglo-Japanese Property Commission established pursuant to the Agreement concluded between the Allied Powers and the Government of Japan on 12 June 1952 Commission anglo-japonaise des biens, établie en vertu de l’Accord conclu entre les Puissances Alliées et le Gouvernement du Japon le 12 juin 1952 Decision of 30 November 1960 in the case United Kingdom in re Struthers and others v. Japan* Décision du 30 novembre 1960 dans l’affaire Royaume-Uni in re Struthers et al. c. Japon** Treaty of peace between the United Kingdom and Japan of 1951—treaty interpre- tation—intention of the parties—meaning of “property”—inability of States to restrict treaty obligations through national law.
    [Show full text]
  • Henry V Plays Richard II
    Colby Quarterly Volume 26 Issue 2 June Article 6 June 1990 "I will...Be like a king": Henry V Plays Richard II Barbara H. Traister Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/cq Recommended Citation Colby Quarterly, Volume 26, no.2, June 1990, p.112-121 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Colby. It has been accepted for inclusion in Colby Quarterly by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Colby. Traister: "I will...Be like a king": Henry V Plays Richard II "I will . .. Be like a king": Henry V Plays Richard II by BARBARA H. TRAISTER N BOTH RichardII and Henry v, the first and last plays ofthe second tetralogy, I kings engage in highly theatrical activity. Each play, however, has a very different metadramatic focus. In Richard II acting becomes a metaphor for the way Richard sees himself. The focus of audience attention is the narcissistic royal actor whose principal concern is his own posturing and who is his own greatest, and eventually only, admirer. Richard is an actor and dramatist, the embodiment of Elizabeth I's comment: "We Princes, I tell you, are set on stages, in the sight and view of all the world duly observed" (quoted in Neale 1957,2:19). However, his self-ab­ sorption and blindness to the world around him lead the audience to make few, if any, connections between him and the actor-dramatist who created him. The play is nearly empty of self-reflexive dramatic overtones despite its complex portrait of a player king.
    [Show full text]
  • 17-1299 Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. V. Hyatt (05/13/2019)
    (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2018 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA v. HYATT CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA No. 17–1299. Argued January 9, 2019—Decided May 13, 2019 Respondent Hyatt sued petitioner Franchise Tax Board of California (Board) in Nevada state court for alleged torts committed during a tax audit. The Nevada Supreme Court rejected the Board’s argument that the Full Faith and Credit Clause required Nevada courts to ap- ply California law and immunize the Board from liability. The court held instead that general principles of comity entitled the Board only to the same immunity that Nevada law afforded Nevada agencies. This Court affirmed, holding that the Full Faith and Credit Clause did not prohibit Nevada from applying its own immunity law. On remand, the Nevada Supreme Court declined to apply a cap on tort liability applicable to Nevada state agencies. This Court reversed, holding that the Full Faith and Credit Clause required Nevada courts to grant the Board the same immunity that Nevada agencies enjoy. The Court was equally divided, however, on whether to over- rule Nevada v. Hall, 440 U.
    [Show full text]
  • NBC Subsidiary (WMAQ TV) LLC V. Chicago Police Department, 2019 IL App (1St) 181426
    Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court NBC Subsidiary (WMAQ-TV) LLC v. Chicago Police Department, 2019 IL App (1st) 181426 Appellate Court NBC SUBSIDIARY (WMAQ-TV) LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. THE Caption CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant-Appellant. District & No. First District, Fourth Division No. 1-18-1426 Filed September 5, 2019 Decision Under Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County, No. 17-CH-09589; the Review Hon. Neil H. Cohen, Judge, presiding. Judgment Affirmed. Counsel on Mark A. Flessner, Corporation Counsel, of Chicago (Benna Ruth Appeal Solomon, Myriam Zreczny Kasper, and Jonathon D. Byrer, Assistant Corporation Counsel, of counsel), for appellant. Matthew Topic, Joshua Burday, and Merrick Wayne, of Loevy & Loevy, of Chicago, for appellee. Panel JUSTICE LAMPKIN delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Presiding Justice Hoffman and Justice Rochford concurred in the judgment and opinion. OPINION ¶ 1 Plaintiff, Chicago-based NBC Subsidiary (WMAQ-TV) LLC (WMAQ), sued defendant, the Chicago Police Department (CPD), seeking disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 ILCS 140/1 et seq. (West 2016)) of records related to the 2014 fatal shooting of 16-year-old W.R. by police officers. ¶ 2 The circuit court granted WMAQ’s partial summary judgment motion but denied CPD’s cross-motion for summary judgment. The court ruled that the records concerning the investigation of W.R. for a criminal offense were exempt from disclosure under FOIA due to confidentiality provisions applicable to the law enforcement records of minors pursuant to the Juvenile Court Act of 1987 (Act) (705 ILCS 405/1-1 et seq.
    [Show full text]
  • Barclays Bank PLC V. Franchise Tax Board: the Need for Judicial Restraint in Foreign Commerce Clause Analysis Todd Cameron Taylor
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of North Carolina School of Law NORTH CAROLINA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND COMMERCIAL REGULATION Volume 20 | Number 2 Article 6 Winter 1995 Barclays Bank PLC v. Franchise Tax Board: The Need for Judicial Restraint in Foreign Commerce Clause Analysis Todd Cameron Taylor Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj Recommended Citation Todd C. Taylor, Barclays Bank PLC v. Franchise Tax Board: The Need for Judicial Restraint in Foreign Commerce Clause Analysis, 20 N.C. J. Int'l L. & Com. Reg. 329 (1994). Available at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj/vol20/iss2/6 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation by an authorized editor of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Barclays Bank PLC v. Franchise Tax Board: The eedN for Judicial Restraint in Foreign Commerce Clause Analysis Cover Page Footnote International Law; Commercial Law; Law This note is available in North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ ncilj/vol20/iss2/6 NOTES Barclays Bank PLC v. Franchise Tax Board: The Need for Judicial Restraint in Foreign Commerce Clause Analysis I. Introduction It is an oft-repeated legal maxim that hard cases make bad law. To this statement it should be added that good results in hard cases still make bad law.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah V. Evans: How Census 2000'S "Sampling in Disguise" Fooled the Supreme Court Into Allocating Utah's Seat in the U.S
    Pepperdine Law Review Volume 31 Issue 4 Article 5 5-15-2004 Utah v. Evans: How Census 2000's "Sampling in Disguise" Fooled the Supreme Court into Allocating Utah's Seat in the U.S. House of Representatives to North Carolina Nathan T. Dwyer Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, and the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation Nathan T. Dwyer Utah v. Evans: How Census 2000's "Sampling in Disguise" Fooled the Supreme Court into Allocating Utah's Seat in the U.S. House of Representatives to North Carolina, 31 Pepp. L. Rev. Iss. 4 (2004) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr/vol31/iss4/5 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Caruso School of Law at Pepperdine Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pepperdine Law Review by an authorized editor of Pepperdine Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. Utah v. Evans: How Census 2000's "Sampling in Disguise" Fooled the Supreme Court into Allocating Utah's Seat in the U.S. House of Representatives to North Carolina TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND A. History of the Census B. Standing Problemsfor Census Cases C. The Census Act D. The Census Clause of the Constitution III. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND IV. ANALYSIS A. Justice Breyer's Majority Opinion B. Justice O'Connor'sDissenting Opinion C. Justice Thomas's Dissenting Opinion D. Justice Scalia's Dissenting Opinion V.
    [Show full text]
  • Batmobile Replicas
    FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DC COMICS, No. 13-55484 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:11-cv-03934- RSWL-OP MARK TOWLE, an individual, DBA Garage Gotham, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Ronald S.W. Lew, Senior District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted February 5, 2015—Pasadena, California Filed September 23, 2015 Before: Michael J. Melloy,* Jay S. Bybee, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Ikuta * The Honorable Michael J. Melloy, Senior Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation. 2 DC COMICS V. TOWLE SUMMARY** Copyright / Trademark The panel affirmed the district court’s summary judgment in a copyright and trademark infringement action brought by DC Comics against a maker of Batmobile replicas. The panel held that the Batmobile, as it appeared in the Batman comic books, television series, and motion picture, was entitled to copyright protection because this automotive character was a sufficiently distinctive element of the works. The panel held that DC Comics owned a copyright interest in the Batmobile character, as expressed in the 1966 television series and the 1989 motion picture, because it did not transfer its underlying rights to the character when it licensed rights to produce derivative works. The panel held that the defendant’s replica cars infringed on DC Comics’ copyrights. The panel affirmed the district court’s ruling that the defendant could not assert a laches defense to DC Comics’ trademark infringement claim because he willfully infringed DC’s trademarks.
    [Show full text]
  • Solutions December 3/4 Lorentz Velocity Addition, Time
    PHY 140Y – FOUNDATIONS OF PHYSICS 2001-2002 Tutorial Questions #12 – Solutions December 3/4 Lorentz Velocity Addition, Time Dilation, and Lorentz Contraction 1. Two spaceships are travelling with velocities of 0.6c and 0.9c relative to a third observer. (a) What is the speed of one spaceship relative to the other spaceship if they are going in the same direction? (b) What is their relative speed if they are going in opposite directions? Solution: (a) Define reference frame A for one of the spaceships, say the one travelling at 0.6c (call it #1). Then the observer moves at velocity v = –0.6c with respect to this reference frame. v = -0.6c u = ? A - reference frame A' - reference frame spaceship 2 of spaceship 1 of the observer - moves at u' = 0.9c wrt A' The speed of spaceship #2 with respect to spaceship #1 is then given by Lorentz velocity addition: u'+v 0.9c − 0.6c u = = = 0.652c = 2.0×108 m/s v − 0.6c 1+ u' 1+ (0.9c) c2 c2 (b) Now the spaceships are going in opposite directions, so u’ = -0.9c. v = -0.6c u = ? A - reference frame A' - reference frame spaceship 2 of spaceship 1 of the observer - moves at u' = -0.9c wrt A' ____________________________________________________________________________________ PHY 140Y – Foundations of Physics 2001-2002 (K. Strong) Tutorial 12 Solutions, page 1 Lorentz velocity addition gives: u'+v − 0.9c − 0.6c u = = = −0.974c = −2.9×108 m/s v (−0.6c) 1+ u' 1+ (−0.9c) c2 c2 The negative sign indicates that the space ships are moving in opposite directions.
    [Show full text]
  • DVD-Audio by Gary S
    Everything You Wanted to Know About DVD-Audio By Gary S. Hall When someone says “DVD”, what most people think of is DVD-Video, the now-familiar format supported by tens of millions of players. DVD-Video (“DVD-V”) offers a great picture, random access and interactivity, and it has nice audio features, too. DVD-Audio (“DVD-A”) is the “other” DVD format, using the same physical medium with a different set of content definitions, trading off video features for truly awesome audio fidelity in stereo and surround. DVD-A also includes special navigation features for music listeners. For audio and music producers, DVD-Audio is a natural. A new generation of DVD-A authoring tools now makes it easy and cost-effective to distribute stereo and multi-channel recordings of unprecedented fidelity in any quantity, with user extras such as menu navigation, artist photos, lyrics and liner notes. DVD- Audio / DVD-Video hybrid discs can be made fully compatible with all DVD players as well. At present, DVD-V is more prevalent, but DVD-A is gaining popularity. The DVD- Video spec was finalized several years ago, and players and titles have been available since 1998. By contrast, the specification for DVD-Audio was only truly completed in 2001. Today, increasing number of DVD players support DVD-Audio as well as DVD- Video (at very attractive prices, too). The number of DVD-Audio titles is now increasing rapidly, as major record companies and specialty labels rush to take advantage of the format’s special features What Makes DVD-Audio So Great? The table below compares the features of DVD-Video and DVD-Audio.
    [Show full text]
  • GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY V. PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS, LLC
    03/05/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 2, 2020 GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS, LLC Appeal from the Chancery Court for Knox County No. 181578-2 Clarence E. Pridemore, Jr., Chancellor No. E2019-00649-COA-R3-CV This appeal arises out of a negligence lawsuit. TLD Logistics Services, Inc. (“TLD”), an interstate common carrier, sued Pilot Travel Centers, LLC (“Pilot”) in the Chancery Court for Knox County (“the Trial Court”). TLD was a customer of Comdata Network, Inc. (“Comdata”), and Pilot was a Comdata vendor. Upon request from TLD, Comdata issued codes for the creation of Comcheks, negotiable draft instruments TLD used to pay workers. Pilot would print and deliver the Comcheks. TLD alleged that Pilot breached its duty of care by failing to ascertain whether Comchek payees were legitimate, thus causing TLD monetary loss when a rogue TLD employee fraudulently caused numerous Comcheks to be issued that were negotiated by Pilot. Pilot filed a motion for summary judgment. Pilot argued in its motion that TLD should have kept better internal safeguards to prevent what happened with its employee, and that TLD was 50% or more at fault in this matter. The Trial Court granted Pilot’s motion for summary judgment. Great American Insurance Company (“Great American”), subrogee of TLD and substituted as plaintiff mid-proceedings below, appeals to this Court. We hold that reasonable minds could disagree as to whether TLD was 50% or more at fault. We reverse the judgment of the Trial Court, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion.
    [Show full text]