DOCSLIB.ORG

Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-63205-8 - the Cambridge Companion To: Duns Scotus Edited by Thomas Williams Index More Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-63205-8 - the Cambridge Companion To: Duns Scotus Edited by Thomas Williams Index More Information Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-63205-8 - The Cambridge Companion to: Duns Scotus Edited by Thomas Williams Index More information INDEX Medieval authors are indexed according to their given names. absolute vs ordained (ordinate) power, Bertold of St. Denys, 5 70–1, 219, 253–4, 317–18 Boethius, 333 accidents: distinguished from substance, Boethius of Dacia, 171, 186 29–30; individuation of, 35–6, 115 Bonaventure, 122 action, category of, 34 Boniface VIII, Pope, 4–5 Adam Wodeham, 7, 8, 12, 100 Brampton, C. K., 3 affectio commodi, 345–9, 356 Broad, C. D., 83 affectio iustitiae, 345–9, 356 Albert the Great, 186 Callebaut, Andre,´ 6 Algazel, 81 categories, 18, 20, 26–38, 116, 197–8; Anselm, 194, 195, 198, 222, 247–8, highest genera, 28 250–1, 346 causes, 38–42, 46, 200–9, 213n55; Antonius Andreas, 7, 9 accidental, defined, 40; essentially appetite: intellective, 342–7; sensory, ordered, 40–2, 137–9, 200–9, 292; 342–4 per se, 138, defined, 40; sine qua non, Aristotle, 21, 29, 31–2, 36, 69–83 64n74; univocal vs equivocal, 47 passim, 101, 106, 131–3, 150, 163, cave, analogy of, 260 183, 224, 238, 253, 256, 258, 271, change (see also self-change), 46, 285–304 passim, 336, 352–73 passim 49, 271 Augustine, 222, 239–40, 249, 286, 303, charity, 353–4, 363–8, 370, 373–4 333, 352–74 passim common nature, 108–12, 168–71, 200–1, Averroes,¨ 91, 101, 133, 286, 360 216, 272 Averroism, 197–8 concupiscible part, 343–4 Avicenna, 101–5, 107–11, 168, 173, Condemnation of 1277, 69, 73, 112, 174–5, 198, 220, 226–7, 286 124n38 contingency of the present, 130–7 beatific vision, 257, 260, 293–4 continua, 30–1, 78–83, 87–9 being (see also univocity): and goodness, counterpossible reasoning, 151–3 332–5; infinite vs finite, 27–8, 56–7, Cross, Richard, 8, 93n3 223–4, 249–52; not a genus, 28; object of the intellect, 294–5; proper Day, Sebastian, 299 attributes (passiones), 19; qua being, Decalogue, 257, 313–16 subject of metaphysics,15–20 Dedekind, Richard, 80 Benedict XI, Pope, 5 dependence, noncausal, 39–41 405 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-63205-8 - The Cambridge Companion to: Duns Scotus Edited by Thomas Williams Index More information 406 index Descartes, Rene,´ 194 goodness: and being, 332–5, 339–42; different vs diverse, 20–1, 56–7, 120–1 moral, 323–8, 332–42, 355–60; dispensation, 314–19, 322–3 primary (essential), 339–40; secondary distinction: formal, 22–5, 56, 121, 193, (accidental), 340–2 211–12, 269; modal, 25–6, 32, 56–7; of reason, 22; real, 21–2 haecceity, see individual difference divisibilism, 30–1, 78 happiness (beatitudo), 256–7, 260, Dumont, Stephen D., 8, 10, 11, 119 325–7, 336–9, 366–8 Henry Harclay, 14 n34 elements, 53 Henry of Ghent, 114, 122, 178;on eminence, order of, 38, 206–7 cognition, 285, 300–4;on essence (see also universal), 102–12; individuation, 101, 113, 114;on vs existence, 55–6, 60n33 natural theology, 242, 245; on powers essential order, 40–2, 137, 195 of the soul, 268–70; on the object of ethics, 15 the intellect, 294; on the possibility of Etienne (Stephen) Tempier, 69, 112 a void, 73–4 Hugh of Hertilpole, 4, 13n9 fallacies, 182–5 illumination, divine, 300–4 firmitas, 143–5 immortality, 194, 224–5, 276–8, 336, 363 first intentions, 106, 174 Incarnation, 146 see also form ( soul, substantial forms), inception: defined, 5; of Scotus, 2 forma 50–3, 271–2; of the body ( Indiscernibility of Identicals, 22 corporeitatis), 51–2, 272–7; Platonic, individual difference (haeceitas), 103–4, 111, 333 118–22, 214, 225, 272, 296 see also freedom ( will), 129, 194–5, individuation, 100–2, 112–22;of 221–3; compatible with necessity, accidents, 35–6, 115 141–5; divine, 219–23; human, 135, indivisibilism, 79–82 139, 266–7, 324–8, 344–9, 355–7 indivisibles, 30–1, 79–83, 86–9 future contingents, God’s knowledge infinite regress, impossible in of, 84–5, 130–1 essentially ordered things, 43–5, 202–7 instants (signa) of nature, 133–5, Giles of Rome: on immobility of place, 158n11, 216–17 76; on individuation, 115 intellect, 280n22; acts naturally, 324; Gilles de Ligny, 5 object of, 293–6; possible vs agent, God (see also freedom, natural theology): 286–7; vs sense, 286, 295–6, 343 acts contingently, 135–7, 139, 220–3, intelligible species, 163–70, 174, 287–93 225; has no real relations to creatures, intensification and remission of forms, 37; ideas, 215–16; immensity, 85; 25–6, 32–3 infinity, 223–4; necessity of, 210; not intentionality, 288–90 the subject of metaphysics, 16–17; intuitive cognition, 293, 296–300 nothing in common with creatures, irascible part, 343–4 21, 56–7; omnipotence, 69, 194, Islam, 4 217–19; omniscience, 213–17; proof of God’s existence, 39–45, Jean Buridan, 147–8, 186 137–40, 151–3, 193–209, 238–9; Johannes (Meister) Eckhart, 4 simplicity, 24–5, 56–7, 211–12, 240–1, John of Damascus (Damascene), 270 244–5; unicity, 210 John of Pouilly, 6 Godfrey of Fontaines, 101, 114–15, 291 Kant, Immanuel, 359 Gonsalvus of Spain, 2, 4, 5, 6 King, Peter, 121 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-63205-8 - The Cambridge Companion to: Duns Scotus Edited by Thomas Williams Index More information index 407 Knights Templar, 6 Pelagius, 367 knowledge (see also intellect), 285–304; per se object, 16–17 derives from sense perception, 18, Peter John Olivi: on cognition, 291;on 239, 294–6; of God, 238–60;ofthe individuation, 113; on universals, 112 moral law, 319–23; vs comprehension, Peter of Auvergne, 114, 171 252, 255–6 phantasms, 163–4, 287, 291, 295, 297, 299–300 Leibniz, G. W., 154–6, 194, 215 Philip IV, King of France (“the Fair”), 4–5 Lewis, David, 226 Philip Bridlington, 1, 3 Little, A. G., 2 philosophy of language, 161–88 Locke, John, 168 physics, 15, 57n2 logic, 15, 105–7, 161–88;definition of, place, 34, 70–8;defined, 70 174–5 Plantinga, Alvin, 199, 226 Longpre,´ E., 6 Porphyry, 21, 101 Luther, Martin, 366 Porphyrian tree, 120–1 Port-Royal Logic, 168 MacDonald, Scott, 332–3 position, 70 Major (Mair), John, 2 possibility, see modality Malcolm, Norman, 226 possible worlds, 129, 154–5, 199 Marmo, Costantino, 105 predicables, 106, 176 mathematics, 16, 57n2 predication: in quid and in quale, 19–21; matter, 49–50, 271; as principle of universal, 106, 111–12 individuation, 114–18 presentism, 84–9 McTaggart, J. T. E., 83 primary object, 16–17 prime matter, 49–50 metaphysics, 15–68, 195–6; science of principle, 46–8 being qua being, 15–18 principle of sufficient reason, 206 modal potency, objective vs subjective, proper attribute, 20, 29 49–50 propositio famosa, 133–4, 146 modality, 129–56, 198–200, 226, 347 prudence, 369–71 mode of signifying, 172–4, 213 pure (unqualified) perfections, 26–7, 194, Moses Maimonides, 133, 240–2 211, 247–8;defined, 247 motion (local motion), 89–93 quality, category of, 31–3 natural law, 312–28 quantity: as principle of individuation, natural theology, 193–227, 238 114–18; category of, 27, 30–1; necessity, see modality discrete vs continuous, 30, 78; negative theology (via negativa), 240–2 transcendental, 27 nonevident power for opposites, 131, 141, 156 Radulphus Brito, 171, 186 Noone, Timothy B., 8 relation: category of, 33–8; foundation of, defined, 34, 94n7; individuation of, occasionalism, 219, 235n110 35–6; intrinsically vs extrinsically Ockham’s razor, see Scotus’s rule advenient, 33–4, 62n58, 70, 94n7; operations, defined, 47 numerical vs specific sameness, 74–8; ordinatio,defined, 9 subject of, defined, 35; terminus of, defined, 34; third-mode, 36–8 participation, 332–4 reportatio,defined, 10 passion, category of, 34 repugnantia, 146–50, 218 passions, 342–5, 368–9 Richard Middleton, 272 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-63205-8 - The Cambridge Companion to: Duns Scotus Edited by Thomas Williams Index More information 408 index Richard Rufus of Cornwall, on 276–7; on immobility of place, 76;on immobility of place, 76 immortality, 224–5, 276–8;on Robert Grosseteste, 132; on immobility impossibility, 218; on individuation, of place, 76; on time and motion, 91 101, 114, 215–16; on moral goodness, Robert Holkot, 136 327–8; on natural law, 313–14;on Robert Kilwardby, 272 natural theology, 239; on necessity in Roger Bacon: on indivisibilism, 81;on willing, 222; on powers of the soul, signification, 167, 170, 186;on 268–9, 271; on signification, 169, 186; universals, 102, 111 on unicity of substantial form, 272–6; Roger Marston, 115 on universals, 102; on virtue, 354, Russell, Bertrand, 83 360–1; on will, 325–7 Thomas of Erfurt, 161 Scotus’s rule, 354 time, 83–93, 131–2; and motion, 89–93 second intentions, 106–7, 174–7 tractatus de creditis, 13, 234 self-change, 46–8 transcendentals, 26–8, 196–7; semantic representationalism, 167–8 disjunctive, 26, 38, 61n41, 193, 195 senses, 286, 293 transitivity theorem, 42 Siger of Brabant, 169, 170, 173, 186 Trinity, 23, 134, 182–5, 233n68 Siger of Courtrai, 173 Tweedale, Martin, 102 Simon of Faversham, 170, 171, 186 signification: direct vs indirect, 164–8; ultimate differentia, 19–20, 59n19 of abstract terms, 171–4; of singular unity, numerical, defined, 123n7; less terms, 169–70 than numerical, 107–11, 121 soul, 50–4; immateriality, 263–7; universal hylemorphism, 67n100 powers, 267–71; relation to body, universals, 100–12; logical vs 271–8 metaphysical treatment of, 105–6 sophismata, 123n22, 182–5 univocity, 194, 212–13, 245–7;defined, space, 70 58n14, 196, 246; of being, 18–20, 193, Spinoza, Benedict, 227 196–7, 294 Stephen Tempier, see Etienne Tempier substance, 115–16; category
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Where Was Duns Scotus Born?
    WHERE WAS DUNS SCOTUS BORN? FRANCISCANS OF THE I MMACULATE, IN ASSOCIATION WITH A DAY WITH MARY From an article by Charles Balic, OFM, written in 1966 to commemorate Ave Maria! the seventh centenary of the birth of blessed John Duns Scotus A disputed question... Under the above head- leading to a kind of birthplace of the Subtle ing, The Berwickshire mathematical certainty. Doctor, John Duns Sco- News of Tuesday 12 Often we must be con- tus. April, 1966, printed a tent with arguments letter to the editor in which afford moral cer- which it was stated that titude or give such a we are still uncertain degree of probability as about the exact birth‑- to exclude any other place of the great Brit- hypothesis. Now it ish philosopher and seems to me quite cer- theologian, John Duns tain that the documents Blessed John Duns Scotus, hold- ing a scroll with a paraphrase Scotus... and the historical argu- of his doctrine about how the It is not necessary to ments which we pos- Immaculate Conception ties in with the absolute primacy of point out that in the sess lead us with cer- Christ: “Christ preserved the field of history one can- tainty to the conclusion Blessed Virgin from every stain of sin; otherwise He would not not always expect to that the town of Duns have been Perfect Redeemer.” have obvious evidence in Scotland was the “There is as much discussion about his birthplace as about Homer's” Questions about Scotus… An Irishman, or an Englishman perhaps? WHERE WAS BLESSED JOHN DUNS SCOTUS Two monographs on tioned the attempts to tus, qui les repousse et BORN? Duns Scotus appeared make our Doctor either les met hors de com- COULD “SCOTUS” APPLY at the end of the second an Irishman or an En- bat”; and the other wri- EQUALLY TO PRESENT- decade of this century, glishman.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract of Monia Mancinelli's Work (RAMUS
    Abstract of Monia Mancinelli’s work (RAMUS PhD - curriculum FITMU, XXIX cicle – XV o. s.) Title: “The Principle of Individuation in Landulph Caracciolus’s commentary on the Sentences. Text and study”. This research is aimed at reconstructing and studying the sections of Landulph Caracciolus’s commentary on the Sentences dedicated to the principle of individuation. Landulph Caracciolus is a Franciscan friar coming from Naples who lived in the XIVth century and who lectured the Sentences at Paris in the academic year 1318-1319. Recently, Christopher D. Schabel has underlined that, despite its widespread popularity and the important context of its composition, however, Landulph’s commentary on the Sentences has largely been neglected. From 1999 Christopher D. Schabel and Russell L. Friedman have been promoting a larger attention to Landulph’s commentary, showing that the Franciscan friar can be an interesting mean to trace the story of the reception of Duns Scotus and Peter Auriol’s doctrines at the University of Paris during the first twenty years of the XIVth century. The question of the principle of the individuation is about the research of the existence and the identification of the element responsible for both ontological determination and knowledge of the single entity. The first chapter of this work shows that the question explodes during the XIIIth century thanks to the Aristotelian corpus and to Avicenna’s and Averroes’s works, and many thinkers try to offer a personal solution to the problem, offering six main competing theories: 1) real natures are individual as such (William of Ware); 2) double negation (Henry of Ghent); 3) actual existence (maybe Roger Bacon, Peter of Falco, Peter of Alverny or Robert Kilwardby); 4) the collection of personal accidents/properties (ascribed to Boethius), and particularly quantity (Godfrey of Fontaines and Thomas Sutton); 5) matter (Albert the Great, Thomas of Aquin and Giles of Rome); 6) respectus ad agens (unknown).
    [Show full text]
  • Page 958 H-France Review Vol. 10 (December 2010), No. 224 Stephen
    H-France Review Volume 10 (2010) Page 958 H-France Review Vol. 10 (December 2010), No. 224 Stephen F. Brown, Thomas Dewender and Theo Kobusch, eds., Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century, Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters 102. Leiden and Boston: E. J. Brill, 2009. xviii + 519. Table, indices of manuscripts, names, and subjects. $231.00 U.S., 162 € (hb.). ISBN 978 90 04 17566 2. Review by William J. Courtenay, University of Wisconsin-Madison. The early fourteenth century has become a particularly active area of research in medieval philosophy and theology in the last two decades. Interest in Oxford thought led the way. Building upon the earlier publication of the works of Richard Campsale, William of Ockham, and the Lectura Secunda of Adam Wodeham, we now have editions of the works of Walter Chatton and Henry of Harclay, and questions from Thomas Wylton, Walter Burley, Richard Fitzralph, and Thomas Bradwardine. As regards Paris, the ongoing critical edition of the opera omnia of John Duns Scotus and a portion of Peter Auriol’s commentary on the Sentences is now been followed by projects for critical editions of the rest of Auriol’s commentary and the Sentences commentaries of Durand of St. Pourçain, Francis of Marchia, and Gerard Odonis. Philosophical Debates brings together many of those who are leading the research field on Parisian thought in the early fourteenth century. The essays themselves are the result of a joint project between Stephen Brown at Boston College and Thomas Dewender at Bonn, who hosted two conferences on this theme at their respective institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Theories of Cognition in the Later Middle Ages
    Theories of cognition in the later Middle Ages ROBERT PASNAU St. Joseph's University q;.::.~ CAMBRIDGE - ::: UNIVERSITY PRESS PUBLISHED BY THE PRESS SYNDICATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1RP, United Kingdom CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, United Kingdom 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA 10 Samford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne 3166, Australia © Robert Pasnau 1997 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 1997 Typeset in Palatino Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Pasnau, Robert. Theories of cognition in the later Middle Ages / Robert Pasnau. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-521-58368-3 1. Knowledge, Theory of - History. 2. Cognition - History. 3. Philosophy, Medieval. 4. Thomas, Aquinas, Saint, 1225?-1274. 5. Olivi, Pierre Jean, 1248 or 9-1298. 6. William, of Ockham, ca. 1285-ca. 1349. 1. Title. B161.P37 1997 128'.2'0902 - dC20 96-36249 C1P A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library Transferred to digital printing 2003 Contents Preface page vii List of abbreviations x Introduction 1 1 The philosophical-historical context 4 2 Thomas Aquinas and the theory of species 11 3 Challenges to the theory 18 PART r: FUNDAMENTALS 1 Immateriality and intentionality 31 1 Cognition
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Stephen D
    CURRICULUM VITAE Stephen D. Dumont May 17, 2019 E DUCATION B.A. Philosophy and English, Wabash College (May, 1974; Phi Beta Kappa) M.A. Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto (December, 1976) M.S.L. (Licentiate in Mediaeval Studies) Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, University of Toronto (October, 1979) Ph.D. Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto (Conferred February, 1983) Thesis: Henry of Ghent and John Duns Scotus on the Existence of God. Supervisor: Armand A. Maurer A REA OF RESEARCH Medieval philosophy and theology A CADEMIC A PPOINTMENTS 2007-2010: Chairperson, Department of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame 2006- Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame 2001-2006: Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame 1995-2001: Joint Appointment, Associate Professor, Centre for Medieval Studies and Department of Philosophy, University of Toronto 1988-1995: Senior Fellow, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies and Associate Professor, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto 1985-1988: Junior Fellow, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies and Assistant Professor, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto 1982-1985: Assistant Professor, School of Philosophy, Catholic University of America 1981-1982: Instructor, School of Philosophy, Catholic University of America S CHOLARSHIPS AND F ELLOWSHIPS 1980-1981: Ontario Graduate Scholarship, University of Toronto 1978-1980: College Fellowship, Trinity College, University of Toronto 1977-1980: Open Fellowships, University of Toronto G RANTS • Grant from Office of the Vice-President for Research ($70,000) to continue work on Critical Edition of John Duns Scotus, Reportationes Parisienses. Co-PI with Kent Emery. • Summer Research Institute at Harris Manchester College, Oxford University, June, 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cambridge Companion to Ockham
    the cambridge companion to ockham Each volume of this series of companions to major philosophers contains specially commissioned essays by an international team of scholars, together with a substantial bibliography, and will serve as a reference work for students and nonspecialists. One aim of the series is to dispel the intimidation such readers often feel when faced with the work of a difficult and challenging thinker. The Franciscan William of Ockham (c. 1288–1347) was an English medieval philosopher, theologian, and political theorist. Along with Thomas Aquinas and John Duns Scotus, he is regarded as one of the three main figures in medieval philosophy after around 1150. Ockham is important not only in the history of philosophy and theo- logy but also in the development of early modern science and of modern notions of property rights and church-state relations. This volume offers a full discussion of all significant aspects of Ockham’s thought: logic, philosophy of language, metaphysics and natural philosophy, epistemology, ethics, action theory, political thought, and theology. It is the first study of Ockham in any lan- guage to make full use of the new critical editions of his works and to consider recent discoveries concerning his life, education, and in- fluences. New readers will find this the most convenient and accessible guide to Ockham currently available. Advanced students and spe- cialists will find a conspectus of recent developments in the inter- pretation of Ockham. Paul Vincent Spade is Professor of Philosophy at Indiana University. Downloaded from https:/www.cambridge.org/core. University of Arizona, on 07 Apr 2017 at 16:44:25, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https:/www.cambridge.org/core/termsCambridge Companions.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PECIA SYSTEM and ITS USE Alison Joan Ray
    THE PECIA SYSTEM AND ITS USE IN THE CULTURAL MILIEU OF PARIS, C1250-1330 Alison Joan Ray UCL Submitted for the degree of PhD in History 2015 1 I, Alison Joan Ray, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signed, ___________________ 2 ABSTRACT This thesis is an examination of the pecia system in operation at the University of Paris from c1250 to 1330, and its use in the cultural milieu of the city during this period. An appendix (1) lists the manuscripts with user notes on which the thesis is primarily based. As the university community rose as a leading force in theology and philosophy, so too did the book trade that supported this network. The pecia system of book production mass-produced texts efficiently and at a low cost to its users, mainly university masters, students, preachers, and visitors to the Paris cultural community. Users interacted with pecia manuscripts by leaving a wide range of marginalia in works. Marginalia are classified according to a devised user typology scheme and include ownership marks, passage summaries, and comments on the main text. We have two further surviving sources for the Paris system: bookseller lists of pecia-produced works from 1275 and 1304. Chapters 1 to 10 examine separate genres of texts available on the pecia lists, theological and philosophical works as well as preaching aids. That Paris pecia manuscripts were used in action as preaching aids is one of the conclusions the user notes help to establish.
    [Show full text]
  • Faith, Reason, and the Eternity of the World in Gregory of Rimini
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by eScholarship@BC Faith, reason, and the eternity of the world in Gregory of Rimini Author: John W. Peck Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:106729 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2015 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Faith, Reason, and the Eternity of the World in Gregory of Rimini A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the S.T.L. Degree from the Boston College School of Theology and Ministry Submitted by: Rev. Mr. John W. Peck, SJ Co-mentors: Boyd Taylor Coolman Dominic F. Doyle May, 2015 Boston College School of Theology and Ministry Brighton, Massachusetts 1 Contents I. Introduction…………………………………………………………………..3 II. Chapter One – The Context of Gregory’s Question on the Eternity of the World: Peter Auriol and William of Ockham………………………………..7 A. Peter Auriol………………………………………………………………8 B. William of Ockham……………………………………………………...17 III. Chapter Two - Gregory of Rimini on the Composition of Continua and Its Relation to the Possibility of a World ab aeterno…………………………...35 A. Gregory of Rimini’s Answer to Peter Auriol…………………………….36 B. Gregory, Continua, and the Eternity of the World……………………….42 i. Gregory on the Composition of Space…………………………...42 ii. Gregory on the Composition of Time……………………………50 IV. Chapter Three - The Relevance of God’s Power to Undo the Past for Gregory’s Contribution to the Eternity of the World Debate………………..63 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century Studien Und Texte Zur Geistesgeschichte Des Mittelalters
    Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters Begründet von Josef Koch Weitergeführt von Paul Wilpert, Albert Zimmermann und Jan A. Aertsen Herausgegeben von Andreas Speer In Zusammenarbeit mit Tzotcho Boiadjiev, Kent Emery, Jr. und Wouter Goris BAND 102 Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century Edited by Stephen F. Brown, Th omas Dewender and Th eo Kobusch LEIDEN • BOSTON 2009 Th is book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Philosophical debates at Paris in the early fourteenth century / edited by Stephen F. Brown, Th omas Dewender & Th eo Kobusch. p. cm. — (Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters, ISSN 0169-8028 ; v. 102) Papers originally delivered at conferences in Bonn and Boston. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-90-04-17566-2 (hbk. : alk. paper) 1. Paris (France)—Intellectual life— Congresses. 2. Paris (France)—Intellectual life—Sources—Congresses. 3. Université de Paris—History—Congresses. 4. Philosophy, Medieval—Congresses. 5. Th eology—History—To 1500—Congresses. I. Brown, Stephen F. II. Dewender, Th omas. III. Kobusch, Th eo. IV. Title. V. Series. DC725.P48 2009 189—dc22 2009007301 ISSN 0169-8028 ISBN 978 90 04 17566 2 Copyright 2009 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, Th e Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Hotei Publishing, IDC Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers and VSP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Etk/Evk Namelist
    NAMELIST Note that in the online version a search for any variant form of a name (headword and/or alternate forms) must produce all etk.txt records containing any of the forms listed. A. F. H. V., O.P. Aali filius Achemet Aaron .alt; Aaros .alt; Arez .alt; Aram .alt; Aros philosophus Aaron cum Maria Abamarvan Abbo of Fleury .alt; Abbo Floriacensis .alt; Abbo de Fleury Abbot of Saint Mark Abdala ben Zeleman .alt; Abdullah ben Zeleman Abdalla .alt; Abdullah Abdalla ibn Ali Masuphi .alt; Abdullah ibn Ali Masuphi Abel Abgadinus Abicrasar Abiosus, John Baptista .alt; Abiosus, Johannes Baptista .alt; Abiosus, Joh. Ablaudius Babilonicus Ableta filius Zael Abraam .alt; Abraham Abraam Iudeus .alt; Abraam Iudeus Hispanus .alt; Abraham Iudeus Hispanus .alt; Abraam Judeus .alt; Abraham Iudaeus Hispanus .alt; Abraham Judaeus Abracham .alt; Abraham Abraham .alt; Abraam .alt; Abracham Abraham Additor Abraham Bendeur .alt; Abraham Ibendeut .alt; Abraham Isbendeuth Abraham de Seculo .alt; Abraham, dit de Seculo Abraham Hebraeus Abraham ibn Ezra .alt; Abraham Avenezra .alt; ibn-Ezra, Avraham .alt; Aben Eyzar ? .alt; Abraham ben Ezra .alt; Abraham Avenare Abraham Iudaeus Tortuosensis Abraham of Toledo Abu Jafar Ahmed ben Yusuf ibn Kummed Abuali .alt; Albualy Abubacer .alt; Ibn-Tufail, Muhammad Ibn-Abd-al-Malik .alt; Albubather .alt; Albubather Alkasan .alt; Abu Bakr Abubather Abulhazen Acbrhannus Accanamosali .alt; Ammar al-Mausili Accursius Parmensis .alt; Accursius de Parma Accursius Pistoriensis .alt; Accursius of Pistoia .alt; M. Accursium Pistoriensem
    [Show full text]
  • Philip the Chancellor, Bonaventure of Bagnoregio, and Thomas
    PHILIP THE CHANCELLOR, BONAVENTURE OF BAGNOREGIO, AND THOMAS AQUINAS ON THE ETERNITY OF THE WORLD A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Joseph William Yarbrough, III May 2011 © 2011 Joseph William Yarbrough, III PHILIP THE CHANCELLOR, BONAVENTURE OF BAGNOREGIO, AND THOMAS AQUINAS ON THE ETERNITY OF THE WORLD Joseph William Yarbrough, III, Ph.D. Cornell University 2011 Some philosophers have thought that there are sound arguments proving that past time is necessarily finite in duration. In light of these arguments, I examine the positions taken on past time by Philip the Chancellor, Bonaventure, and Thomas Aquinas. Philip argues that nothing created can be eternal and that everything which is not eternal is finite in past duration; I argue that many of the insights of Philip’s position can be preserved even if the world is infinite in past duration. Bonaventure also believes that a created world must be finite in past duration, but, as I show, he accepts the conceptual possibility of infinite past time in an uncreated world. Despite being more liberal about infinite past time than is often believed, Bonaventure maintains the principle that it is impossible for an infinite number of things to exist simultaneously. I discuss how this principle bears on the eternity of the world discussion in both Bonaventure’s writing and Aquinas’. Aquinas holds this principle for much of his career, albeit with some hesitation, but at the end of his life, he rejects it.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Problem of Universals in the Middle Ages: Notes and Texts
    History of the Problem of Universals in the Middle Ages: Notes and Texts Paul Vincent Spade Philosophy P401/P515 Fall 2009 History of the Problem of Universals in the Middle Ages: Notes and Texts Copyright ÓÓ 2009 by Paul Vincent Spade Table of Contents Part One: Notes .................................................................................................. 8 Porphyry the Phoenician, Isagoge.................................................................. 9 Boethius, From his Second Commentary on Porphyry’s Isagoge................ 15 Peter Abelard, From the “Glosses on Porphyry” in His Logica ‘ingredientibus’ ............................................................................................ 17 John of Salisbury ...................................................................................... 17 Outline of Part of the Passage from the Logica ‘ingredientibus’.............. 17 Notes on the Passage from the Logica ‘ingredientibus’ ........................... 21 John Duns Scotus, Six Questions on Individuation from His Ordinatio, ii, d. 3, pars 1, qq. 1–6 ................................................................ 27 Notes to Question 1 .................................................................................. 27 Note to Question 2.................................................................................... 27 Note to Question 3.................................................................................... 28 Notes to Question 4 .................................................................................
    [Show full text]