DOCSLIB.ORG

Natural Capital Account and Ecosystem Services Opportunities Mapping

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Natural Capital Account and Ecosystem Services Opportunities Mapping Irwell Management Catchment Natural Capital Account & Ecosystem Services Opportunity Mapping Created by: GMCA Date published: April 2018 About Natural Course 78% of water bodies in North West England are failing to meet a good ecological status* and solutions are often found to be too expensive to implement. Natural Course is a collaboration of organisations in North West England from public, private and third sector who, together, will seek cost-effective solutions to improving water quality across urban and rural landscapes, sharing best practice across the UK and Europe. *Environment Agency, North West River Basin District 2015 Natural Course will: • Test and inform best practice in achieving UK and EU legislation in water quality • Use the North West River Basin District as a flagship project and share best practice with the UK and Europe • Make better use of resources, share ownership of complex issues and maximise outcomes through a collaborative approach of organisations from public, private and third sector. Join the conversation #NaturalCourse IRWELL MANAGEMENT CATCHMENT NATURAL CAPITAL ACCOUNT AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES OPPORTUNITIES MAPPING TEP Genesis Centre Birchwood Science Park Warrington WA3 7BH Tel: 01925 844004 Email: [email protected] www.tep.uk.com Offices in Warrington, Market Harborough, Gateshead, London and Cornwall PLANNING I DESIGN I ENVIRONMENT CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 Overview ................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 Purpose of this Report ............................................................................................ 12 3.0 Approach ................................................................................................................. 13 4.0 Study Area Overview .............................................................................................. 29 5.0 Natural Capital Account .......................................................................................... 31 6.0 Water Quality .......................................................................................................... 33 7.0 Water Resources .................................................................................................... 42 8.0 Flood Risk Mitigation ............................................................................................... 46 9.0 Carbon Sequestration ............................................................................................. 52 10.0 Leisure and Recreation (including Health) .............................................................. 58 11.0 Amenity…………………………………………………………………………………….69 12.0 Biodiversity and Ecological Networks ..................................................................... 76 13.0 Air Quality ............................................................................................................... 81 14.0 Noise Reduction and Temperature Regulation ....................................................... 85 15.0 Agriculture (Food Production) and Timber Production ............................................ 88 16.0 Next Steps .............................................................................................................. 90 TABLES PAGE Table 1: ESS in Scope .......................................................................................................... 17 Table 2: Measures to Deliver Ecosystem Service Uplift ....................................................... 24 Table 3: Breakdown of Habitat Types in the Study Area ...................................................... 29 Table 4: Natural Capital Account for the IMC ....................................................................... 31 Table 5: Total Value of ESS within the Study Area ............................................................... 33 Table 6: Ecosystem Service Opportunity Assessment for Water Quality ............................. 36 Table 7: Breakdown of Value of Water Resources ............................................................... 42 Table 8: Breakdown of Flood Damages in Study Area ......................................................... 46 Table 9: Ecosystem Service Opportunity Assessment for Flood Risk Mitigation .................. 48 Table 10: Breakdown of the Value of Carbon Sequestration within the Study Area ............. 52 Table 11: Ecosystem Service Opportunity Assessment for Carbon Sequestration .............. 55 Table 12: Breakdown of the Value of Leisure and Recreation within the Study Area ........... 58 Table 13: Breakdown of the Cost Savings for Physical Health within the Study Area .......... 60 Table 14: Breakdown of the Cost Savings for Mental Health within the Study Area ............ 62 Table 15: Ecosystem Service Opportunity Assessment for Leisure and Recreation ............ 66 Table 16: Breakdown of the Value of Amenity within the Study Area ................................... 69 6635.040 March 2018 1.0 Table 17: Tree Canopy Cover ............................................................................................... 72 Table 18: Ecosystem Service Opportunity Assessment for Amenity .................................... 72 Table 19: Ecosystem Service Opportunity Assessment for Ecological Networks ................. 78 Table 20: Ecosystem Service Opportunity Assessment for Air Quality ................................ 82 Table 21: Breakdown of the Value of Agriculture (Food Production) within the Study Area . 88 Table 22: Breakdown of the value of Timber Production within the Study Area ................... 88 Table 23: Natural Capital Value and Ecosystem Service Opportunity Matrix ....................... 94 FIGURES PAGE Figure 1: IMC Boundary, Showing the Waterbodies Studied .................................................. 5 Figure 2: Methodology .......................................................................................................... 14 Figure 3: Study Area, including River, Flood Zone and 100m Buffer .................................... 15 Figure 4: Example of Broad Habitat Mapping ....................................................................... 16 Figure 5: Total Value of Ecosystem Services by Waterbody Catchment .............................. 19 Figure 6: Opportunity Mapping and the Decision Making Process ....................................... 20 Figure 7: Process of ESS Opportunity Assessment ............................................................. 21 Figure 8: Heat Map of a Waterbody Corridor Showing a Single ESS Opportunity Assessment (Water Quality) ...................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 9: Composite Heat Map of a Waterbody Corridor for all ESS Opportunities Combined .............................................................................................................................................. 23 Figure 10: Value of Water Quality within IMC ....................................................................... 34 Figure 11: Activities Contributing to Diffuse Pollution Sources (APEM, 2017)...................... 35 Figure 12: Consented Discharge with Conditions ................................................................. 38 Figure 13: Land with a High Concentration of Flowpaths ..................................................... 39 Figure 14: Water Quality ESS Opportunity Heat Map ........................................................... 40 Figure 15: Value of Water Abstraction within IMC ................................................................ 43 Figure 16: Value of Annualised Flood Risk in IMC ............................................................... 47 Figure 17: Flood Mitigation ESS Opportunity Heat Map ....................................................... 50 Figure 18: Carbon Sequestration Value within IMC .............................................................. 53 Figure 19: Carbon Sequestration ESS Opportunity Heat Map ............................................. 56 Figure 20: Leisure and Recreation Value within IMC ............................................................ 59 Figure 21: Value of Physical Health within IMC .................................................................... 61 Figure 22: Value of Mental Health within the IMC ................................................................. 63 Figure 23: Leisure and Recreation ESS Opportunity Heat Map ........................................... 67 Figure 24: Value of Amenity within the IMC .......................................................................... 70 Figure 25: Amenity ESS Opportunity Heat Map ................................................................... 74 Figure 26: Ecological Networks Opportunity Heat Map ........................................................ 79 6635.040 March 2018 1.0 Figure 27: Air Quality Opportunity Heat Map ........................................................................ 83 Figure 28: Clustered Greenspaces > 20ha ........................................................................... 84 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: MASTER DATASETS APPENDIX B: SUMMARY OF STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOPS APPENDIX C: HABITAT TYPES DEFINITIONS AND MAPPING PROTOCOLS APPENDIX D: ECOSYSTEM SERVICES VALUATIONS AND NATURAL CAPITAL METHODOLOGY APPENDIX E: OPPORTUNITY ASSESSMENT – METHODS AND MAPPING PROTOCOLS APPENDIX F: MAPPING TOOL USER GUIDE APPENDIX G: NATURAL CAPITAL ACCOUNTS BY WATERBODY AND DISTRICT APPENDIX H: ECOSYSTEM SERVICES OPPORTUNITY
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1.Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers
    1.Environmental Permits, Incidents and Registers 1.1 Industrial Sites Holding Licences and/or Authorisations Searches of information provided by the Environment Agency and Local Authorities reveal the following information: Records of historic IPC Authorisations within 500m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. Records of Part A(1) and IPPC Authorised Activities within 500m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. Records of Water Industry Referrals (potentially harmful discharges to the public sewer) within 500m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. Records of Red List Discharge Consents (potentially harmful discharges to controlled waters) within 500m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. Records of List 1 Dangerous Substances Inventory Sites within 500m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. Records of List 2 Dangerous Substance Inventory Sites within 500m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. Records of Part A(2) and Part B Activities and Enforcements within 500m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. Records of Category 3 or 4 Radioactive Substance Licences within 500m of the study site: 0 Database searched and no data found. Records of Licensed Discharge Consents within 500m of the study site: 8 Report Reference: CMAPS-CM-58903-8043-030211EDR Page 9 The following Licensed Discharge Consents records are represented as points on the Authorisations, Incidents and Registers map: ID Distance Direction
    [Show full text]
  • Rossendale Local Plan Flood Risk Incorporating Sequential Test Topic Paper
    ROSSENDALE LOCAL PLAN FLOOD RISK INCORPORATING SEQUENTIAL TEST TOPIC PAPER March 2019 Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Background ..................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 National Context ..................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Regional / Local context .......................................................................................................... 8 3 Evidence base................................................................................................................................ 10 3.1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) ............................................................................... 10 3.2 Sustainability Appraisal (SA) ................................................................................................. 12 4 Applying the Sequential Test ........................................................................................................ 12 4.1 Site allocations ...................................................................................................................... 12 Proposed allocations in flood zone 1 ................................................................................................ 13 Proposed allocations in flood zone 2 ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Greater Manchester
    Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Greater Manchester Sub-Regional Assessment Appendix B – Supporting Information “Living Document” June 2008 Association of Greater Manchester Authorities SFRA – Sub-Regional Assessment Revision Schedule Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Greater Manchester June 2008 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 August 2007 DRAFT Michael Timmins Jon Robinson David Dales Principal Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Peter Morgan Alan Houghton Planner Head of Planning North West 02 December DRAFT FINAL Michael Timmins Jon Robinson David Dales 2007 Principal Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Peter Morgan Alan Houghton Planner Head of Planning North West 03 June 2008 FINAL Michael Timmins Jon Robinson David Dales Principal Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Anita Longworth Alan Houghton Principal Planner Head of Planning North West Scott Wilson St James's Buildings, Oxford Street, Manchester, This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Scott Wilson's M1 6EF, appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. It is addressed to and for the sole and confidential use and reliance of Scott Wilson's client. Scott Wilson United Kingdom accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the purposes for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the contents of this document, without the prior written permission of the Company Secretary of Scott Wilson Ltd. Any advice, opinions, Tel: +44 (0)161 236 8655 or recommendations within this document should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Assessment Proposed Development Site Mytholme House Waterfoot Rossendale
    FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SITE MYTHOLME HOUSE WATERFOOT ROSSENDALE Carley Daines & Partners 11, Bridgewater Road Walkden, Worsley 12-B-10063 Manchester M28 3JE email:- [email protected] 14th May 2013 CONTENTS 1 Introduction & Objectives 2. Site Location & Description 3. Appraisal of Flood Risk – on site 4. Appraisal of Flood Risk – off site 5. Conclusions & Recommendations 6. Appendices 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This report has been produced following a study of relevant information, and the obtaining of flood data from Envirocheck and the Environment Agency, as well as site visits. 1.2 This Flood Risk Assessment is based upon the requirements of the Communities and Local Government Department Document – Planning Policy Statement (PPS) 25:Development and Flood Risk. 1.3 PPS25 maintains the classifications of Flood Zones 1, 2 and 3. Flood Zone 3 is sub-divided to Flood Zones 3A (high probability) and Zone 3B (functional flood plain). 1.4 PPS25 also introduces a flood risk classification of development to essential infrastructure, highly vulnerable, more vulnerable, less vulnerable, and water compatible development. Residential dwellings are generally identified as being in the more vulnerable category, whilst commercial/retail development is generally defined as being less vulnerable. 1.5 Annex C of PPS25 indicates that flooding from the following sources should be considered to develop a full risk assessment: - Rivers - Sea - Land - Ground water - Sewers - Reservoirs, canals and other artificial sources. 2.0 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 2.1 The site is located close to Waterfoot Town Centre, to the east of Burnley Road East and to the south of Wood Lea Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Croal/Irwell Local Environment Agency Plan Environmental Overview October 1998
    Croal/Irwell Local Environment Agency Plan Environmental Overview October 1998 NW - 10/98-250-C-BDBS E n v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y Croal/lrwell 32 Local Environment Agency Plan Map 1 30 30 E n v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y Contents Croal/lrwell Local Environment Agency Plan (LEAP) Environmental Overview Contents 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Air Quality 2 1.3 Water Quality 7 1.4 Effluent Disposal 12 1.5 Hydrology. 15 1.6 Hydrogeology 17 1.7 Water Abstraction - Surface and Groundwater 18 1.8 Area Drainage 20 1.9 Waste Management 29 1.10 Fisheries 36 1.11 . Ecology 38 1.12 Recreation and Amenity 45 1.13 Landscape and Heritage 48 1.14 Development . 5 0 1.15 Radioactive Substances 56 / 1.16 Agriculture 57 Appendix 1 - Glossary 60 Appendix 2 - Abbreviations ' 66 Appendix 3 - River Quality Objectives (RQOs) 68 Appendix 4 - Environment Agency Leaflets and Reports 71 Croal/lrwell LEAP l Environmental Overview Maps Number Title Adjacent to Page: 1 The Area Cover 2 Integrated Pollution Control (IPC) 3 3 Water Quality: General Quality Assessment Chemical Grading 1996 7 4 Water Quality: General Quality Assessment: Biological Grading 1995 8 5 Water Quality: Compliance with proposed Short Term River Ecosystem RQOs 9 6 Water Quality: Compliance with proposed Long Term River Ecosystem RQOs 10 7 EC Directive Compliance 11 8 Effluent Disposal 12 9 Rainfall 15 10 Hydrometric Network 16 11 Summary Geological Map: Geology at Surface (simplified) 17 12 Licensed Abstractions>0.5 Megalitre per day 18 13 Flood Defence: River Network 21 14 Flood Defence: River Corridor
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Programme Update Service Update
    = Progress as expected ENVIRONMENT DIRECTORATE PROGRESS – ROSSENDALE: QUARTER 4 JANUARY - MARCH 2014 = Progress not as expected Summary: Environment Directorate progress against delivery of the Commissioning Plan for Rossendale in the fourth quarter of 2013/14 = Issues identified Assistant Director of Commissioning: Joanne Reed : [email protected] : 01772 530897 = Information CAPITAL PROGRAMME UPDATE SERVICE UPDATE 2013/14 CAPITAL PROGRAMME END OF YEAR SUMMARY Road and Street Maintenance: Pothole Repair 37 schemes (79%) of Rossendale's capital programme planned for delivery in 2013/14 were completed. The capital works for 7 schemes are ongoing. An update for these 7 schemes is detailed on the reverse PROGRESS AS EXPECTED PROGRESS NOT AS EXPECTED 2013/14 Capital schemes programmed for delivery in quarter 4 In 2013/14, 97.2% of the potholes, identified through Highway Safety Inspections (HSI) across Capital schemes scheduled for delivery in 13 out of the 17 capital schemes, due for delivery in quarter 4, have quarter 4 2013/14 which have been delayed Lancashire, were repaired within a 30 day period. Therefore the 90% target was achieved. In either been completed or are progressing as planned, and are Rossendale, 5,447 potholes were identified during 2013/14 by HSIs. Of which 5,344 (98.1%) detailed below. For details of the remaining schemes please see Flood Risk Management and Drainage were repaired within 30 days. Proposals for the revision of the defect maintenance indicator will the 'Progress not as Expected' section below. o The following schemes are to be be taken to Cabinet Committee for Performance Improvement (CCPI) for approval in June.
    [Show full text]
  • River Irwell Management Catchment – Evidence and Measures Greater
    River Irwell Management Catchment – Evidence and Measures Greater Manchester Combined Authority Water body output maps LIFE Integrated Project LIFE14IPE/UK/027 The Irwell Management Catchment Water body ID Water body Name GB112069064660 Irwell (Source to Whitewell Brook) GB112069064670 Whitewell Brook GB112069064641 Irwell (Cowpe Bk to Rossendale STW) GB112069064680 Limy Water GB112069064650 Ogden GB112069064620 Irwell (Rossendale STW to Roch) GB112069064610 Kirklees Brook GB112069060840 Irwell (Roch to Croal) GB112069061451 Irwell (Croal to Irk) GB112069064720 Roch (Source to Spodden) GB112069064690 Beal GB112069064730 Spodden GB112069064600 Roch (Spodden to Irwell) GB112069064710 Naden Brook GB112069061250 Whittle Brook (Irwell) GB112069064570 Eagley Brook GB112069064560 Astley Brook (Irwell) GB112069064530 Tonge GB112069064540 Middle Brook GB112069064550 Croal (including Blackshaw Brook) GB112069061161 Irk (Source to Wince Brook) GB112069061120 Wince Brook GB112069061131 Irk (Wince to Irwell) GB112069061452 Irwell / Manchester Ship Canal (Irk to confluence with Upper Mersey) GB112069061151 Medlock (Source to Lumb Brook) GB112069061152 Medlock (Lumb Brook to Irwell) GB112069061430 Folly Brook and Salteye Brook. GB112069064580 Bradshaw Brook Click on a water body to navigate to that map Water body name Issues: Comments provided during the Opportunity theme symbols Workshop on the 10th February • Lists the issues in the water Fisheries – barrier removal body and their causes Physical modifications Opportunities: • Based on the issues what Water quality are the main opportunities for the Partnership. This excludes water company issues and the Mitigation Measures Actions as these are presented as other opportunities below. Map of the waterbody indicating the location of Irwell Catchment Partnership Projects, Mitigation Measures Actions, Environment Agency sampling locations, Mitigation Measure Actions: consented discharges, and priority barriers for eel. • A list of the Mitigation Measures Actions identified in the water body by the Environment Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • 8.1 Appendix Desk Study.Docx
    Rooley Moor Wind Farm Environmental Statement Appendix 8.1: Desk Study Rooley Moor Ecological Desk Study | V1 4th June 2014 Ecological Desk Study Project Name Project no: JE30481 Document title: Ecological Desk Study Document no: Revision: V1 Date: 24/04/14 Client name: Client Name Client no: Client Reference Project manager: Jo Moran Author: V Newlove File name: \\uk-bfs-mdc02\projects\JEIA\Projects\JE30481\Technical\Ecology\ES Chapter Ecology\ES Appendices\8.1 Appendix Desk study.docx SKM (Jacobs) 7th Floor Stockbridge House Trinity Gardens Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 2HJ T +44 (0)191 2112400 F +44 (0)191 2112401 www.jacobs.com COPYRIGHT: The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of SKM (Jacobs). Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Jacobs® is a trademark of Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved V1a 30/06/2014 Internal Review VN NF JM <document number> i Ecological Desk Study Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Important note about your report....................................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Discharge Consents Irwell Catchment
    Review of discharge consents. River Irwell catchment report Item Type monograph Publisher North West Water Authority Download date 25/09/2021 14:27:27 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/27235 RSD2/A20 REVIEW OF DISCHARGE CONSENTS IRWELL CATCHMENT REPORT Contents 1. Introduction 2. Physical Description of Catchment 3. River Water - Chemical Classification 4 . Discharges and Consents 4.1 Authority Sewage Treatment Works 4.2 Authority Trade Effluent Discharges 4.3 Private Trade Effluent Discharges 4.4 Private Sewage Treatment Works 4 .5 Storm Sewage Overflows 5. Special Cases MARCH 1979 Introduction The purpose of this Report is to make recommendations for the revision of consents for discharges within the catchment of the River Irwell, downstream to and including the River Medlock in Manchester. This revision has the sole objective of recognising the present effluent and river water quality - proposals for long term river water quality objectives are to be put forward in other Reports. The report identifies the existing situation regarding the legal status of effluent discharges from Authority and non-Authority owned installations within the catchment, details the determinand concentration limits included in existing discharge consents (where appropriate) and proposes the limits to be included in the reviewed consents. The reviewed consents will reflect the quality of efflu­ ent achievable by good operation of the existing plant based on 1977 effluent quality data but taking into account any improvements, extensions etc. that have been or are about to be carried out and any known further industrial and/or housing development in the works drainage area. The proposed limits are intended to be the 95% compliance figures rather than the 80% compliance figures inferred in existing consents and hence the new figures will obviously be higher than the old.
    [Show full text]
  • River Basin Management Plan North West River Basin District
    River Basin Management Plan North West River Basin District Annex C: Actions to deliver objectives Contents C.1 Introduction 3 C.2 Actions we can all take 9 C.3 All sectors 11 C.4 Agriculture and rural land management 14 C.5 Angling and conservation 32 C.6 Central government 45 C.7 Environment Agency 52 C.8 Industry, manufacturing and other business 67 C.9 Local and regional government 78 C.10 Mining and quarrying 87 C.11 Navigation 92 C.12 Urban and transport 96 C.13 Water industry 102 Environment Agency River Basin Management Plan, North West River Basin District 2 Annex C: Actions to deliver objectives December 2009 C.1 Introduction This annex sets out tables of the actions (the programmes of measures) that are proposed for each sector. Actions are the on the ground activities that will implemented to manage the pressures on the water environment and achieve the objectives of this plan. Further information relating to these actions and how they have been developed is given in: • Annex B: Objectives for waters in the North West River Basin District This gives information on the current status and environmental objectives that have been set and when it is planned to achieve these. • Annex D: Protected area objectives (including programmes for Natura 2000) This gives details of the location of protected areas, the monitoring networks for these, the environmental objectives and additional information on programmes of work for Natura 2000 sites. • Annex E: Actions appraisal This gives information about how we have set the water body objectives for this plan and how we have selected the actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Environment Agency Plan
    local environment agency plan CROAL/IRWELL CONSULTATION DRAFT OCTOBER 1998 En v i r o n m e n t A g e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE HEAD OFFICE Rio House, Waterside Drive. Aztec West, Almondsbury, Croal/lrwell 32 Local Environment Agency Plan Map 1 30 30 E n v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y H ^ . BURNLEY BC BUSINESS REPLY SERVICE Licence No NW W 359A Environment Agency Appleton House 430 Birchwood Boulevard Birchwood WARRINGTON Cheshire WA3 7AA Foreword Welcome to our latest Local Environment Agency Plan (LEAP) Consultation Report for the Croal/lrwell area. Our aim is to produce a local agenda of action for.environmental improvement which addresses issues which we are unable to solve through our day to day work. We have attempted to draw together the issues which we believe need tackling to improve your local environment. As the LEAP provides the focus for actions by the Agency, it is important that the issues we have raised relate to our key responsibilities for the regulation of waste, releases to air from some industrial processes and protecting and improving the water environment. However, where issues are raised which do not relate directly to our responsibilities, we hope to influence others to plan and act in ways that support our Environmental Strategy for the Millennium and Beyond. In order for the LEAP to be effective we need to know your views. We would like to know what you think of the issues raised, whether you would like other environmental issues to be added, and whether you can work together with us to achieve environmental improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • JBA Consulting Report Template 2015
    Rossendale Hybrid Level 1 and Level 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Final Report November 2016 Rossendale Borough Council Business Centre Futures Park Bacup Lancashire OL13 0BB JBA Project Manager Mike Williamson JBA Consulting Bank Quay House Sankey Street Warrington WA1 1NN Revision History Revision Ref / Date Issued Amendments Issued to V1.0 / 26 September 2016 - Adrian Smith (RBC) V2.0 / 15 November 2016 RBC & EA comments Adrian Smith (RBC) Contract This report describes work commissioned by Adrian Smith, on behalf of Rossendale Borough Council, by a letter dated 31 May 2016. Rossendale Borough Council's representative for the contract was Adrian Smith. Mike Williamson of JBA Consulting carried out this work. Prepared by .................................................. Mike Williamson BSc MSc EADA FRGS CGeog Chartered Senior Analyst Reviewed by ................................................. Howard Keeble MPhil BEng BSc CertBusStud CEng CEnv CSci MICE MCIWEM C.WEM Technical Director Purpose This document has been prepared as a Final Report for Rossendale Borough Council. JBA Consulting accepts no responsibility or liability for any use that is made of this document other than by Rossendale Borough Council for the purposes for which it was originally commissioned and prepared. JBA Consulting has no liability regarding the use of this report except to Rossendale Borough Council. 2016s4505 RBC Level 1 & 2 Hybrid SFRA Final Report v2.0.docx i Acknowledgements JBA would like to thank all Rossendale Borough Council, Environment Agency and United Utilities staff for their time and commitment to providing data and discussing the issues identified during the course of this study. Copyright © Jeremy Benn Associates Limited 2016 Carbon Footprint A printed copy of the main text in this document will result in a carbon footprint of 544g if 100% post- consumer recycled paper is used and 693g if primary-source paper is used.
    [Show full text]