Abandoned Mines a the Water Environi
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Nature of Waste Associated with Closed Mines in England and Wales
The nature of waste associated with closed mines in England and Wales Minerals & Waste Programme Open Report OR/10/14 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MINERALS & WASTE PROGRAMME OPEN REPORT OR/10/14 The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data are used with the permission of the The nature of waste associated Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. OS Topography © Crown with closed mines in England and Copyright. All rights reserved. BGS 100017897/2010 Wales Keywords Abandoned mine waste facilities; Palumbo-Roe, B and Colman, T England and Wales; mineral deposits; environmental impact; Contributor/editor European Mine Waste Directive. Cameron, D G, Linley, K and Gunn, A G Front cover Graiggoch Mine (SN 7040 7410), Ceredigion, Wales. Bibliographical reference Palumbo-Roe, B and Colman, T with contributions from Cameron, D G, Linley, K and Gunn, A G. 2010. The nature of waste associated with closed mines in England and Wales. British Geological Survey Open Report, OR/10/14. 98pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and the Environment Agency that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. The views and statements expressed in this report are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily represent the views of the Environment Agency. -
Environmental Protection Final Draft Report
Environmental Protection Final Draft Report ANNUAL CLASSIFICATION OF RIVER WATER QUALITY 1992: NUMBERS OF SAMPLES EXCEEDING THE QUALITY STANDARD June 1993 FWS/93/012 Author: R J Broome Freshwater Scientist NRA C.V.M. Davies National Rivers Authority Environmental Protection Manager South West R egion ANNUAL CLASSIFICATION OF RIVER WATER QUALITY 1992: NUMBERS OF SAMPLES EXCEEDING TOE QUALITY STANDARD - FWS/93/012 This report shows the number of samples taken and the frequency with which individual determinand values failed to comply with National Water Council river classification standards, at routinely monitored river sites during the 1992 classification period. Compliance was assessed at all sites against the quality criterion for each determinand relevant to the River Water Quality Objective (RQO) of that site. The criterion are shown in Table 1. A dashed line in the schedule indicates no samples failed to comply. This report should be read in conjunction with Water Quality Technical note FWS/93/005, entitled: River Water Quality 1991, Classification by Determinand? where for each site the classification for each individual determinand is given, together with relevant statistics. The results are grouped in catchments for easy reference, commencing with the most south easterly catchments in the region and progressing sequentially around the coast to the most north easterly catchment. ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 110221i i i H i m NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY - 80UTH WEST REGION 1992 RIVER WATER QUALITY CLASSIFICATION NUMBER OF SAMPLES (N) AND NUMBER -
River Water Quality 1992 Classification by Determinand
N f\A - S oo-Ha (jO$*\z'3'Z2 Environmental Protection Final Draft Report RIVER WATER QUALITY 1992 CLASSIFICATION BY DETERMINAND May 1993 Water Quality Technical Note FWS/93/005 Author: R J Broome Freshwater Scientist NRA CV.M. Davies National Rivers A h ority Environmental Protection Manager South West Region RIVER WATER QUALITY 1992 CLASSIFICATION BY DETERMINAND 1. INTRODUCTION River water quality is monitored in 34 catchments in the region. Samples are collected at a minimum frequency of once a month from 422 watercourses at 890 locations within the Regional Monitoring Network. Each sample is analysed for a range of chemical and physical determinands. These sample results are stored in the Water Quality Archive. A computerised system assigns a quality class to each monitoring location and associated upstream river reach. This report contains the results of the 1992 river water quality classifications for each determinand used in the classification process. 2. RIVER WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT The assessment of river water quality is by comparison of current water quality against River Quality Objectives (RQO's) which have been set for many river lengths in the region. Individual determinands have been classified in accordance with the requirements of the National Water Council (NWC) river classification system which identifies river water quality as being one of five classes as shown in Table 1 below: TABLE 1 NATIONAL WATER COUNCIL - CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM CLASS DESCRIPTION 1A Good quality IB Lesser good quality 2 Fair quality 3 Poor quality 4 Bad quality The classification criteria used for attributing a quality class to each criteria are shown in Appendix 1. -
Responsibilities for Flood Risk Management
Appendix A - Responsibilities for Flood Risk Management The Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has overall responsibility for flood risk management in England. Their aim is to reduce flood risk by: • discouraging inappropriate development in areas at risk of flooding. • encouraging adequate and cost effective flood warning systems. • encouraging adequate technically, environmentally and economically sound and sustainable flood defence measures. The Government’s Foresight Programme has recently produced a report called Future Flooding, which warns that the risk of flooding will increase between 2 and 20 times over the next 75 years. The report produced by the Office of Science and Technology has a long-term vision for the future (2030 – 2100), helping to make sure that effective strategies are developed now. Sir David King, the Chief Scientific Advisor to the Government concluded: “continuing with existing policies is not an option – in virtually every scenario considered (for climate change), the risks grow to unacceptable levels. Secondly, the risk needs to be tackled across a broad front. However, this is unlikely to be sufficient in itself. Hard choices need to be taken – we must either invest in more sustainable approaches to flood and coastal management or learn to live with increasing flooding”. In response to this, Defra is leading the development of a new strategy for flood and coastal erosion for the next 20 years. This programme, called “Making Space for Water” will help define and set the agenda for the Government’s future strategic approach to flood risk. Within this strategy there will be an overall approach to the assessing options through a strong and continuing commitment to CFMPs and SMPs within a broader planning framework which will include River Basin Management Plans prepared under the Water Framework Directive and Integrated Coastal Zone Management. -
Cornwall Visitor Guide for Dog Owners
Lost Dogs www.visitcornwall.com FREE GUIDE If you have lost your dog please contact the appropriate local Dog Warden/District Council as soon as possible. All dogs are required by law to wear a dog collar and tag Cornwall Visitor bearing the name and address of the owner. If you are on holiday it is wise to have a temporary tag with your holiday address on it. Guide for NORTH CORNWALL KERRIER Dog Warden Service Dog Welfare and Dog Owners North Cornwall District Council Enforcement Officer Trevanion Road Kerrier District Council Wadebridge · PL27 7NU Council Offices Tel: (01208) 893407 Dolcoath Avenue www.ncdc.gov.uk Camborne · TR14 8SX Tel: (01209) 614000 CARADON www.kerrier.gov.uk Environmental Services (animals) CARRICK Caradon District Council Lost Dogs - Luxstowe House Dog Warden Service Liskeard · PL14 3DZ Carrick District Council Tel: (01579) 345439 Carrick House www.caradon.gov.uk Pydar Street Truro · TR1 1EB RESTORMEL Tel: (01872) 224400 Lost Dogs www.carrick.gov.uk Tregongeeves St Austell · PL26 7DS PENWITH Tel: (01726) 223311 Dog Watch and www.restormel.gov.uk Welfare Officer Penwith District Council St Clare Penzance · TR18 3QW Tel: (01736) 336616 www.penwith.gov.uk Further Information If you would like further information on Cornwall and dog friendly establishments please contact VisitCornwall on (01872) 322900 or e-mail [email protected] alternatively visit www.visitcornwall.com Welcome to the Cornwall Visitor Guide for Dog Welfare Dog Owners, here to help you explore Cornwall’s beaches, gardens and attractions with all the Please remember that in hot weather beaches may not be family including four legged members. -
Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Greater Manchester
Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Greater Manchester Sub-Regional Assessment Appendix B – Supporting Information “Living Document” June 2008 Association of Greater Manchester Authorities SFRA – Sub-Regional Assessment Revision Schedule Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Greater Manchester June 2008 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 August 2007 DRAFT Michael Timmins Jon Robinson David Dales Principal Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Peter Morgan Alan Houghton Planner Head of Planning North West 02 December DRAFT FINAL Michael Timmins Jon Robinson David Dales 2007 Principal Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Peter Morgan Alan Houghton Planner Head of Planning North West 03 June 2008 FINAL Michael Timmins Jon Robinson David Dales Principal Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Anita Longworth Alan Houghton Principal Planner Head of Planning North West Scott Wilson St James's Buildings, Oxford Street, Manchester, This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Scott Wilson's M1 6EF, appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. It is addressed to and for the sole and confidential use and reliance of Scott Wilson's client. Scott Wilson United Kingdom accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the purposes for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the contents of this document, without the prior written permission of the Company Secretary of Scott Wilson Ltd. Any advice, opinions, Tel: +44 (0)161 236 8655 or recommendations within this document should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole. -
Reclamation and Development of Geomechanically Transformed Land in the Konin-Turek Coal Basin
POLISH JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE VOL. XLIX/2 2016 PL ISSN 0079-2985 DOI: 10.17951/pjss/2016.49.2.123 AGNIESZKA MOCEK-PŁÓCINIAK* RECLAMATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF GEOMECHANICALLY TRANSFORMED LAND IN THE KONIN-TUREK COAL BASIN Received: 2016.09.05 Accepted: 2017.02.15 1Abstract. This overview article presents major forms of reclamation and development of external and internal spoil tips, which are formed during brown coal mining and from bottom ash dumped near open-pit mines and power stations. In the late 1970s, a new form of agricultural and forest recultivation was developed – the PAN model. According to the concept, crops and forest-forming plant species should be introduced to post-mining grounds immediately after the end of technical recultivation. Vegetation is a particularly reliable indicator of habitat properties and small changes taking place in nature undergoing recovery. Other bioindicators of the quality and health of new- ly formed soil include the biomass of microorganisms, their count, composition and enzymatic activity. In many countries the assessment of the influence of anthropogenic stress factors on the count of soil microorganisms has become one of key elements of obligatory inspection under environmental monitoring. In consequence of revitalisation of anthropogenically changed areas, biological life is restored within the period of at least 20–30 years. It is manifested by the develop- ment of microbial population and soil fauna. Keywords: reclamation, post-mining areas, enzymatic activity, microorganisms, vegetation INTRODUCTION Many minerals are acquired by means of open-pit or underground mining. It causes land transformation and permanent changes in the landscape. New convex forms known as external spoil tips appear in natural geomorphologi- cal systems. -
River Irwell Management Catchment – Evidence and Measures Greater
River Irwell Management Catchment – Evidence and Measures Greater Manchester Combined Authority Water body output maps LIFE Integrated Project LIFE14IPE/UK/027 The Irwell Management Catchment Water body ID Water body Name GB112069064660 Irwell (Source to Whitewell Brook) GB112069064670 Whitewell Brook GB112069064641 Irwell (Cowpe Bk to Rossendale STW) GB112069064680 Limy Water GB112069064650 Ogden GB112069064620 Irwell (Rossendale STW to Roch) GB112069064610 Kirklees Brook GB112069060840 Irwell (Roch to Croal) GB112069061451 Irwell (Croal to Irk) GB112069064720 Roch (Source to Spodden) GB112069064690 Beal GB112069064730 Spodden GB112069064600 Roch (Spodden to Irwell) GB112069064710 Naden Brook GB112069061250 Whittle Brook (Irwell) GB112069064570 Eagley Brook GB112069064560 Astley Brook (Irwell) GB112069064530 Tonge GB112069064540 Middle Brook GB112069064550 Croal (including Blackshaw Brook) GB112069061161 Irk (Source to Wince Brook) GB112069061120 Wince Brook GB112069061131 Irk (Wince to Irwell) GB112069061452 Irwell / Manchester Ship Canal (Irk to confluence with Upper Mersey) GB112069061151 Medlock (Source to Lumb Brook) GB112069061152 Medlock (Lumb Brook to Irwell) GB112069061430 Folly Brook and Salteye Brook. GB112069064580 Bradshaw Brook Click on a water body to navigate to that map Water body name Issues: Comments provided during the Opportunity theme symbols Workshop on the 10th February • Lists the issues in the water Fisheries – barrier removal body and their causes Physical modifications Opportunities: • Based on the issues what Water quality are the main opportunities for the Partnership. This excludes water company issues and the Mitigation Measures Actions as these are presented as other opportunities below. Map of the waterbody indicating the location of Irwell Catchment Partnership Projects, Mitigation Measures Actions, Environment Agency sampling locations, Mitigation Measure Actions: consented discharges, and priority barriers for eel. • A list of the Mitigation Measures Actions identified in the water body by the Environment Agency. -
8.1 Appendix Desk Study.Docx
Rooley Moor Wind Farm Environmental Statement Appendix 8.1: Desk Study Rooley Moor Ecological Desk Study | V1 4th June 2014 Ecological Desk Study Project Name Project no: JE30481 Document title: Ecological Desk Study Document no: Revision: V1 Date: 24/04/14 Client name: Client Name Client no: Client Reference Project manager: Jo Moran Author: V Newlove File name: \\uk-bfs-mdc02\projects\JEIA\Projects\JE30481\Technical\Ecology\ES Chapter Ecology\ES Appendices\8.1 Appendix Desk study.docx SKM (Jacobs) 7th Floor Stockbridge House Trinity Gardens Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 2HJ T +44 (0)191 2112400 F +44 (0)191 2112401 www.jacobs.com COPYRIGHT: The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of SKM (Jacobs). Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Jacobs® is a trademark of Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved V1a 30/06/2014 Internal Review VN NF JM <document number> i Ecological Desk Study Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Important note about your report....................................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................... -
Mine-Water Chemistry: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly David Banks 7 Paul L
Research article Mine-water chemistry: the good, the bad and the ugly David Banks 7 Paul L. Younger 7 Rolf-Tore Arnesen 7 Egil R. Iversen 7 Sheila B. Banks Objective Abstract Contaminative mine drainage waters have become one of the major hydrogeological and The objective of this paper is to review the variety of hy- geochemical problems arising from mankind’s in- drochemical characteristics, environmental impacts and trusion into the geosphere. Mine drainage waters in treatment methods pertaining to waters discharging from Scandinavia and the United Kingdom are of three mines or mine waste deposits. The paper will draw pre- main types: (1) saline formation waters; (2) acidic, dominantly on examples from the United Kingdom and heavy-metal-containing, sulphate waters derived Norway, many of which have not previously been re- from pyrite oxidation, and (3) alkaline, hydrogen- ported in mainstream literature, to illustrate this variety. sulphide-containing, heavy-metal-poor waters re- A list of references is provided for the reader wishing to sulting from buffering reactions and/or sulphate re- obtain further details of the sites reviewed. duction. Mine waters are not merely to be per- ceived as problems, they can be regarded as indus- trial or drinking water sources and have been used for sewage treatment, tanning and industrial metals extraction. Mine-water problems may be addressed by isolating the contaminant source, by suppressing Introduction the reactions releasing contaminants, or by active or passive water treatment. Innovative treatment In the “First World”, many coal and metal ore mines techniques such as galvanic suppression, applica- have been closed, for economical or political reasons, tion of bactericides, neutralising or reducing agents during the past decade (Younger 1994; Coldewey and (pulverised fly ash-based grouts, cattle manure, Semrau 1994; King 1995; Dumpleton 1995). -
Review of Discharge Consents Irwell Catchment
Review of discharge consents. River Irwell catchment report Item Type monograph Publisher North West Water Authority Download date 25/09/2021 14:27:27 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/27235 RSD2/A20 REVIEW OF DISCHARGE CONSENTS IRWELL CATCHMENT REPORT Contents 1. Introduction 2. Physical Description of Catchment 3. River Water - Chemical Classification 4 . Discharges and Consents 4.1 Authority Sewage Treatment Works 4.2 Authority Trade Effluent Discharges 4.3 Private Trade Effluent Discharges 4.4 Private Sewage Treatment Works 4 .5 Storm Sewage Overflows 5. Special Cases MARCH 1979 Introduction The purpose of this Report is to make recommendations for the revision of consents for discharges within the catchment of the River Irwell, downstream to and including the River Medlock in Manchester. This revision has the sole objective of recognising the present effluent and river water quality - proposals for long term river water quality objectives are to be put forward in other Reports. The report identifies the existing situation regarding the legal status of effluent discharges from Authority and non-Authority owned installations within the catchment, details the determinand concentration limits included in existing discharge consents (where appropriate) and proposes the limits to be included in the reviewed consents. The reviewed consents will reflect the quality of efflu ent achievable by good operation of the existing plant based on 1977 effluent quality data but taking into account any improvements, extensions etc. that have been or are about to be carried out and any known further industrial and/or housing development in the works drainage area. The proposed limits are intended to be the 95% compliance figures rather than the 80% compliance figures inferred in existing consents and hence the new figures will obviously be higher than the old. -
Groundwater Management in Mining Areas
GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT IN MINING AREAS Proceedings of the 2nd IMAGE-TRAIN Advanced Study Course Pécs, Hungary, June 23-27, 2003 EUROPEAN COMMISSION RESEARCH DIRECTORATE-GENERAL CONFERENCE PAPERS/TAGUNGSBERICHTE CP-035 Wien/Vienna, 2004 Projektleitung/Project Management Gundula Prokop Editors Gundula Prokop, Umweltbundesamt, Spittelauer Lände 5, 1090 Vienna, Austria e-mail: [email protected] Paul Younger, University of Newcastle upon TyneNE1 7RU Newcastle upon Tyne, UK e-mail: [email protected] Karl Ernst Roehl, Karlsruhe University, Kaiserstrasse 12, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany e-mail: [email protected] Veranstaltungsorganisation/Event Organisation The Umweltbundesamt being responsible for the overall co-ordination of the meeting. University of Newcastle upon being responsible for the course programme. Karlsruhe University being responsible for the on-site organisation. Mecsekerc Rt. functioning as host and being responsible for the excursion to the aban- doned uranium mining areas near Pécs. Veranstaltungsfinanzierung/Event Funding The European Commission Research Directorate General Satz und Layout/Typesetting and Layout Elisabeth Lössl, Umweltbundesamt Danksagung/Acknowledgement Special thanks are due to Dr. Mihaly Csövári and his team from Mecsek Ore Environ- ment Corporation in Pécs for organising and supporting this course and for providing their expertise for the on-site excursions. Impressum Medieninhaber und Herausgeber: Umweltbundesamt GmbH Published by: Spittelauer Lände 5, 1090 Wien/Vienna, Austria Die unverändert abgedruckten Einzelreferate geben die Fachmeinung ihrer Autoren und nicht notwendigerweise die offizielle Meinung des Umweltbundessamtes wieder. The publisher makes no representation, express or implied, with regard to the accuracy of the information contained in this book and cannot accept any legal responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions that may be made.