Antonio Tajani President, European Parliament Boyko Borisov President

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Antonio Tajani President, European Parliament Boyko Borisov President Stefano Maullu Deputato al Parlamento Europeo Antonio Tajani President, European Parliament Boyko Borisov President of the Council (January- June 2018) Frans Timmermans First Vice-President of the European Commission (Better Regulation, Interinstitutional Relations, the Rule of Law and the Charter of Fundamental Rights) Maroš Šefčovič Vice-President of the European Commission for Energy Union Miguel Arias Cañete European Commissioner for Climate Action and Energy Jerzy Buzek Chair of the ITRE Committee, European Parliament Brussels, 10 January 2018 Dear Presidents, Dear Vice Presidents, Dear Commissioner, Dear Chair, We would like to bring to your attention several critical issues related to the European Commission’s proposal for amendments to the Gas Directive 2009/73/EC.We are concerned about a deviation from established decision-making practice and the principles of better regulation, a key priority of President Juncker and First Vice-President Timmermans which we fully support. 1. The European Commission’s proposal envisages the expansion of the rules of the EU Gas Directive to all existing and future onshore and offshore external gas pipelines. The wording of the proposal seems to significantly change the scope of the existing legislation. It touches upon investment framework and multibillion infrastructure projects. We believe that it is important to make sure that these amendments are subject to ordinary legislative scrutiny by the Members of the Parliament. 2. However, as we understand, no in-depth evaluation of their impact was carried out, nor 12-week stakeholder consultations of such an impact assessment were held prior to the announcement of the proposed amendments. At the same time, the absence of relevant data and a tight timeline for the fast legislative procedure could undermine adequate scrutiny of the proposed legislation by the co-legislators. 3. This concerns in particular the deliberations in the European Parliament. We do appreciate that the Commission on December 6th provided an online-tool for public feedback about the proposed legislation. However, while the deadline for stakeholder feedback has been set for January 31st 2018, the deadline for proposed amendments in ITRE is already on January 16th. This means that ITRE members cannot take full account of stakeholder feedback about the proposed legislation when they are proposing possible amendments. This is particularly problematic, since the Commission did not provide an impact assessment and did not conduct a public consultation in advance of launching the legislative initiative. Such an approach is not in-line with the Commission’s own Better Regulation Guidelines and with the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016. On the basis of these considerations we request: - that the Commission addresses the shortcomings of the legislative preparations by providing a thorough assessment of impacts from the proposed legislation; - that the President of the European Parliament and the Chair of the ITRE Committee ensure an appropriate timeframe for the discussion of the proposed amendments to the Gas Directive. We remain at your disposal for further debates and initiatives on this important issue. Sincerely, Stefano Maullu Aldo Patriciello Peter Kouroumbashev Markus Pieper Hermann Winkler Joachim Zeller Martina Werner Werner Langen Neoklis Sylikiotis Aymeric Chauprade Tatjana Zdanoka Andrejs Mamikins Eva Kaili Christian Ehler Knut Fleckenstein .
Recommended publications
  • Mr Josep Borrell Vice-President of the European Commission High Representative of the Union for the CFSP Rue De La Loi 170 1000 Brussels
    Mr Josep Borrell Vice-President of the European Commission High Representative of the Union for the CFSP Rue de la Loi 170 1000 Brussels Brussels, 16th April 2021 Dear Mr. High Representative; Mr Vice-President of the Commission: A delegation from the illegitimate National Assembly of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, which emerged from the electoral farce organised on 6th December 2020 by the regime of Nicolás Maduro, recently paid a visit to Brussels and was officially received by the institution you lead. According to a statement you made on behalf of the European Union on 6th December, this spurious process took place in the absence of electoral conditions that could have guaranteed its credibility, without any respect for political pluralism, and in an atmosphere of persecution and disqualification of democratic leaders whose legitimate rights were curtailed. Your statement concludes that such circumstances could not consider this process credible, inclusive, and transparent and therefore the results did not represent the will of the Venezuelan people. That initial statement was confirmed on 6 January of this year by a new declaration, in similar terms to those expressed on 6 December, and by the conclusions of the Foreign Affairs Council of 25 January. These reiterated the lack of recognition of the electoral process and regretted the behaviour of the authorities of the Maduro regime, whose actions are preventing a solution to the serious crisis in Venezuela. We were surprised and gravely concerned to learn that on 14th April, at your request, senior officials of the European External Action Service received the aforementioned delegation, comprising Iris Varela, Pedro Carreño and Desirée Santos Amaral, at the EEAS headquarters.
    [Show full text]
  • Brussels, 27 March 2017 Dear Mr. Dijsselbloem, Earlier This Week We
    Brussels, 27 March 2017 Dear Mr. Dijsselbloem, Earlier this week we have known the statements you have made to a communication media, which we consider unequivocally discriminatory and offensive against several EU countries as well as offensive and sexist towards women. Shortly after the publication of your statements, you had the opportunity to rectify at the European Parliament, but you avoided doing so. On the contrary, instead of apologizing, you have said that the problem is that we do not understand the direct style of speech known to Calvinist culture. In our opinion, Calvinist culture has nothing to do with disdain for other people. This is the reason why we are again asking you - as representatives of European citizens, who have chosen us directly - to reflect and to rectify. Your statements attack one of the most important values that underpin our European Union: equality. In the last six decades, we have all managed together, Mr Dijsselbloem, to materialize a dream that once seemed unthinkable: that Europeans should be equal in opportunities, rights and obligations. The EU is not just rules, meetings and political decisions. What supports all of this, what gives meaning to the EU, are our common values, and equality as the most important one. Therefore, respecting these values should be the first obligation for any European leader, Mr Dijsselbloem. This includes assuming that European citizens, like any human being, are all equally respectable, regardless of our gender and our country of origin or residence. Attacking a certain group of countries as you have done is attacking each one of the EU countries.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Mid-Term Election: What Impact on Migration Policy?
    www.epc.eu 16 March 2017 01/12/2009 European Parliament mid-term election: what impact on migration policy? Marco Funk As the dust settles from the European Parliament’s (EP) mid-term election held on 17 January 2017, migration continues to top the EU’s agenda. The election of Antonio Tajani to replace Martin Schulz as president of the EP brought the institution under the leadership of the European People’s Party (EPP) after a power-sharing agreement with the socialist S&D was cancelled and replaced by a last-minute deal with the liberal ALDE group. A closer look at Tajani’s election and associated reshuffle of key internal positions suggests little change in the EP’s course on migration in the short term. However, upcoming developments may significantly change Parliament dynamics in the longer term. New president, different style Antonio Tajani is considered by many to be a less political, less activist president compared to Martin Schulz. The former is also apparently less willing to insist on a prominent role for the EP than the latter. Furthermore, Tajani shares the same conservative political affiliation as the heads of the European Commission and European Council, which makes ideological confrontations with Jean-Claude Juncker and Donald Tusk even less likely than under Schulz, who had few disagreements with either. While Schulz already maintained good relations with Juncker and closely coordinated responses to the large influx of refugees in 2015/2016, Tajani is even better placed to cooperate effectively due to his previous Commission experience and ideological alignment. Despite Tajani’s association with Italy’s populist conservative leader Silvio Berlusconi, he has adopted a more mainstream conservative political identity, which ultimately won him the EPP’s support.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Report
    SPECIAL REPORT Key points for the 8th term of the European Parliament (2014-2019) Madrid, November 2014 BARCELONA BOGOTÁ BUENOS AIRES LIMA LISBOA MADRID MÉXICO PANAMÁ QUITO RIO J SÃO PAULO SANTIAGO STO DOMINGO KEY POINTS FOR THE 8TH TERM OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (2014-2019) 1. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 1. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2. THE LATEST ELECTION The European Parliament has, since its creation in 1962 in the 3. MAIN ISSUES IN THE context of the evolution of European integration, become the LEGISLATIVE AGENDA European Union (EU) Institution to have gained more power and 4. SPANISH DELEGATION relevance in the decision-making process of the Union. Indeed, over the years, it has gained increasingly important powers, legitimized 5. CONCLUSIONS and differentiated by the fact that it is the only EU Institution to be 6. APPENDIX 1: COMPETENCES elected by universal suffrage. 7. APPENDIX 2: CURRENT COMPOSITION OF THE It has evolved from being a mere advisory body to having the COMMITTEES power to co-legislate, together with the Council, in more than 85 legislative areas, exercising legislative powers as well as powers 8. APPENDIX 3: THE CURRENT of budgetary and political control. It also wields a considerable BUREAU OF THE EUROPEAN amount of political influence, and its competences include those PARLIAMENT of electing the President of the European Commission, vetoing the 9. APPENDIX 4: EUROPEAN appointment of the College, and even forcing the resignation of the PARLIAMENT DELEGATIONS entire Commission after a motion of no confidence. AUTHORS The official headquarters of the Parliament are in Strasbourg, where the main plenary sessions are held.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at the New European Parliament Page 1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMITTEE (INTA)
    THE NEW EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT KEY COMMITTEE COMPOSITION 31 JULY 2019 INTRODUCTION After several marathon sessions, the European Council agreed on the line-up for the EU “top jobs” on 2 July 2019. The deal, which notably saw German Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen (CDU, EPP) surprisingly designated as the next European Commission (EC) President, meant that the European Parliament (EP) could proceed with the election of its own leadership on 3 July. The EPP and Renew Europe (formerly ALDE) groups, in line with the agreement, did not present candidates for the EP President. As such, the vote pitted the S&D’s David-Maria Sassoli (IT) against two former Spitzenkandidaten – Ska Keller (DE) of the Greens and Jan Zahradil (CZ) of the ACRE/ECR, alongside placeholder candidate Sira Rego (ES) of GUE. Sassoli was elected President for the first half of the 2019 – 2024 mandate, while the EPP (presumably EPP Spitzenkandidat Manfred Weber) would take the reins from January 2022. The vote was largely seen as a formality and a demonstration of the three largest Groups’ capacity to govern. However, Zahradil received almost 100 votes (more than the total votes of the ECR group), and Keller received almost twice as many votes as there are Greens/EFA MEPs. This forced a second round in which Sassoli was narrowly elected with just 11 more than the necessary simple majority. Close to 12% of MEPs did not cast a ballot. MEPs also elected 14 Vice-Presidents (VPs): Mairead McGuinness (EPP, IE), Pedro Silva Pereira (S&D, PT), Rainer Wieland (EPP, DE), Katarina Barley (S&D, DE), Othmar Karas (EPP, AT), Ewa Kopacz (EPP, PL), Klara Dobrev (S&D, HU), Dita Charanzová (RE, CZ), Nicola Beer (RE, DE), Lívia Járóka (EPP, HU) and Heidi Hautala (Greens/EFA, FI) were elected in the first ballot, while Marcel Kolaja (Greens/EFA, CZ), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL, EL) and Fabio Massimo Castaldo (NI, IT) needed the second round.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Amendments
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 2018/0178(COD) 17.12.2018 AMENDMENTS 386 - 662 Draft report Bas Eickhout, Sirpa Pietikäinen (PE630.512v01-00) Establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment Proposal for a regulation (COM(2018)0353 – C8-0207/2018 – 2018/0178(COD)) AM\1172567EN.docx PE632.154v01-00 EN United in diversity EN AM_Com_LegReport PE632.154v01-00 2/123 AM\1172567EN.docx EN Amendment 386 Elena Gentile Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – title Text proposed by the Commission Amendment Environmental objectives Environmental and social objectives Or. en Amendment 387 Marco Valli, Piernicola Pedicini, Laura Agea Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – title Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 5 Environmental objectives 5 Environmental and social objectives Or. en Amendment 388 Paul Tang, Pervenche Berès Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – title Text proposed by the Commission Amendment Environmental objectives Environmental and social objectives Or. en Amendment 389 Simona Bonafè, Luigi Morgano Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – title Text proposed by the Commission Amendment AM\1172567EN.docx 3/123 PE632.154v01-00 EN 5 Environmental objectives 5 Environmental and social objectives Or. en Amendment 390 Elena Gentile Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Text proposed by the Commission Amendment For the purposes of this Regulation, the For the purposes of this Regulation, the following shall be environmental following shall be environmental and objectives: social objectives: Or. en Amendment 391 Marco Valli, Piernicola Pedicini, Laura Agea Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Text proposed by the Commission Amendment For the purposes of this Regulation, the For the purposes of this Regulation, the following shall be environmental following shall be environmental and objectives: social objectives: Or.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Draft Agenda
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2009 - 2014 Committee on Foreign Affairs AFET(2012)0702_1 DRAFT AGENDA Extraordinary meeting Monday 2 July 2012, 19.00 – 21.30 Strasbourg Room: Winston Churchill (200) 1. Adoption of agenda 2. Chair’s announcements Joint debate 3. Establishing common rules and procedures for the implementation of the Union's instruments for external action AFET/7/08641 ***I 2011/0415(COD) COM(2011)0842 – C7-0494/2011 Rapporteur: Elmar Brok (PPE) PR – PE487.763v01-00 AM – PE491.141v01-00 Responsible: AFET* – Opinions: DEVE* – Thijs Berman (S&D) AD – PE489.521v02-00 AM – PE491.127v02-00 INTA – Laima Liucija Andrikienė PA – PE489.414v01-00 (PPE) BUDG – Nadezhda Neynsky (PPE) PA – PE487.787v01-00 AM – PE489.649v03-00 ITRE – Decision: no opinion Consideration OJ\PE492593v01-00en.rtf PE492.593v01-00 EN United in diversity EN Deadline for tabling amendments: 14 June 2012, 12.00 4. Establishing a financing instrument for the promotion of democracy and human rights worldwide AFET/7/08341 ***I 2011/0412(COD) COM(2011)0844 – C7-0496/2011 Rapporteur: Alexander Graf Lambsdorff (ALDE) PR – PE483.741v01-00 AM – PE491.263v01-00 Responsible: AFET – Opinions: DEVE – Filip Kaczmarek (PPE) AD – PE485.941v02-00 AM – PE489.498v01-00 BUDG – María Muñiz De Urquiza PA – PE487.794v01-00 (S&D) AM – PE489.589v01-00 FEMM – Barbara Matera (PPE) PA – PE487.956v01-00 AM – PE491.098v01-00 Consideration Deadline for tabling amendments: 14 June 2012, 12.00 5. Establishing a European Neighbourhood Instrument AFET/7/08319 ***I 2011/0405(COD) COM(2011)0839 – C7-0492/2011
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament 2014-2019
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ITRE_PV(2016)0523_1 MINUTES Meeting of 23 May 2016, 15.00-18.30, and 24 May 2016, 9.00-12.30 BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 15.11 on Monday, 23 May 2016, with Jerzy Buzek (Chair) presiding. 23 May 2016, 15.00 – 18.30 1. Adoption of agenda ITRE_OJ (2016)0523_1 The agenda was adopted. 2. Chair’s announcements None 3. Approval of minutes of the meetings of: 16-17 March 2016 PV – PE580.678v02-00 7 April 2016 PV – PE582.088v01-00 The minutes were approved. 4. Public Hearing on "The Gas Package – how to strengthen the EU's energy security" ITRE/8/06427 Speakers: Janez Kopač (Energy Community Secretariat), Manon Dufour (E3G Brussels Office), Andrew Walker (Cheniere Energy Inc.), Krišjānis Kariņš, Theresa Griffin, Hans-Olaf Henkel, Carolina Punset, Claude Turmes, Paloma López Bermejo, Jean-Luc Schaffhauser, Claudio Descalzi (CEO INI), Bendt Bendtsen, Flavio Zanonato, Barbara Kappel, Patrizia Toia, Simona Bonafè, Agata Łoskot-Strachota (Centre for Eastern Studies (OSW), Claude Turmes, Jean-Luc Schaffhauser, Patrizia Toia PV\1095490EN.doc PE583.868v01-00 EN United in diversity EN Patrizia Toia (1VP) took the chair from 16:56 to 17:15 5. Exchange of views with Mr Andrus Ansip, Vice-President for the Digital Single Market, as part of the Structured Dialogue (17.15 h -18.30 h) ITRE/8/06433 Speakers: Michał Boni, José Blanco López, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Theresa Griffin, Paul Rübig, Carlos Zorrinho, Constanze Krehl, Anne Sander The meeting adjourned at 18.28 and resumed on Tuesday 24 May at 9.07 with Jerzy Buzek (Chair) in the chair.
    [Show full text]
  • Amendment 171 Dieter-Lebrecht Koch Daniel Caspary Georges
    27.6.2018 A8-0206/171 Amendment 171 Dieter-Lebrecht Koch Daniel Caspary Georges Bach Joachim Zeller Werner Kuhn Sven Schulze Thomas Mann Peter Liese David McAllister Norbert Lins Peter Jahr Sabine Verheyen Angelika Niebler Axel Voss Albert Deß Birgit Collin-Langen Christian Ehler Pascal Arimont Hermann Winkler Reimer Böge Jens Gieseke Elmar Brok Ivo Belet Tom Vandenkendelaere Markus Pieper Monika Hohlmeier Ingeborg Gräßle Markus Ferber Esther de Lange Elisabetta Gardini Massimiliano Salini Alain Lamassoure Renate Sommer Salvatore Domenico Pogliese Burkhard Balz Herbert Dorfmann Lorenzo Cesa Frank Engel Viviane Reding Report A8-0206/2018 Merja Kyllönen Enforcement requirements and specific rules for posting drivers in the road transport sector (COM(2017)0278 - C8-0170/2017 - 2017/0121(COD)) AM\P8_AMA(2018)0206(171-174)EN.docx PE621.702v01-00 EN United in diversity EN Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment Member States shall not apply points (b) Member States shall not apply Directive and (c) of the first subparagraph of Article 96/71/EC to drivers on transit journeys. 3 (1) of Directive 96/71/EC to drivers in Nor shall they apply points (b) and (c) of the road transport sector employed by the first subparagraph of Article 3 (1) of undertakings referred to in Article 1(3)(a) Directive 96/71/EC to drivers in the road of that Directive, when performing transport sector employed by undertakings international carriage operations as defined referred to in Article 1(3)(a) of that by Regulations 1072/2009 and 1073/2009 Directive, when performing international where the period of posting to their carriage operations as defined by territory to perform these operations is Regulations 1072/2009 and 1073/2009 shorter than or equal to 3 days during a where the period of posting to their period of one calendar month.
    [Show full text]
  • LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) Blog: Silvio Is Back: Understanding Berlusconi's Latest Revival Ahead of the Italian
    LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) Blog: Silvio is back: Understanding Berlusconi’s latest revival ahead of the Italian general election Page 1 of 3 Silvio is back: Understanding Berlusconi’s latest revival ahead of the Italian general election Despite currently being banned from holding office, Silvio Berlusconi is well placed to have a key role in the Italian general election in March. Fabio Bordignon outlines the factors behind his latest comeback, and how his Forza Italia party could play a central part in the formation of the next Italian government. In the past when we Italian scholars of political science met our colleagues at international conferences, it was always the same question: why Berlusconi? How could a media tycoon, facing multiple-trials and allegations, an unlikely politician later known for his ‘bunga bunga’ parties, have become the leading figure in one of the largest western democracies? The astonishment of the international observer was particularly acute in 2011, when Berlusconi, hit by personal scandals and by the Eurozone debt crisis, resigned as prime minister. Now the world has changed, and it’s full of Berlusconi-style politicians. But at a time when political leaders seem to fade as fast as they rise, Berlusconi is still there. The ‘Eternal Leader’ has survived the collapse of his last government, a ban from the Italian Parliament, and a seemingly irreversible electoral (and personal) decline. And now the 81-year-old leader is ready for a new comeback. He cannot be a candidate, but he still leads (owns) his personal party, Forza Italia. And he could win with his centre-right coalition at the Italian general election in March.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Joint Statement
    Dr Stella Kyriakides Commissioner for Health and Food Safety, European Commission And Dr Thierry Breton Commissioner for Internal Market, European Commission And: Dr Rafael Mariano Grossi IAEA Director Subject: Transport of Radiopharmaceuticals in the European Union Brussels, 22th April 2020 Dear Commissioners, Dear Director during this pandemic period, the outcome of which is unknown, we must continue to ensure that services in the hospitals are provided to patients who require radiopharmaceutical care. Radiopharmaceuticals are drugs that are used for imaging diagnosis and therapy. Radiopharmaceuticals are crucial to provide CT scans for COVID-19 patients (SPECT/CT and PET/CT imaging) as well as for fragile patient populations, such as cancer and cardiac patients. Due to the radioactive part the shelf life is extremely limited and measured in hours and days. Whereas most regular drugs have shelf lives of months or years and can be produced in mass quantities, radiopharmaceuticals are produced in much smaller quantities and have to be produced for delivery just in time. This is often the day after production, and they are given to a patient usually on that day. In case of a imaging procedure, the scan also takes place the same day. This means that in the EU countries in over 90% of cases the time between the patient dose being ordered, produced, shipped and the actual diagnostic or therapeutic test is 24 hours. Furthermore, these short timeframes are extremely important since a radiopharmaceutical that cannot be used on the day of delivery and preparation in the hospital must be discarded. These days, the number of controls at the borders have seriously increased (potentially causing delays) and the administrative demands are sometimes hard to follow and fulfil.
    [Show full text]
  • Itre Pv(2014)0924 1
    EURÓPSKY PARLAMENT 2014 - 2019 Výbor pre priemysel, výskum a energetiku ITRE_PV(2014)0924_1 ZÁPISNICA zo schôdze, ktorá sa konala 24. septembra 2014 od 15.00 do 18.30 h a 25. septembra 2014 od 9.00 do 12.30 h v BRUSELI 24. septembra 2014 od 15.00 do 18.30 h Schôdza sa začala v stredu 24. septembra 2014 o 15.07 h. Predsedal jej predseda Jerzy Buzek. Prijatie programu schôdze ITRE_OJ (2014)0924v01 Program schôdze bol prijatý. Schválenie zápisnice zo schôdze, ktorá sa konala: 22. júla 2014 PE 537.157v01-00 1. Zápisnica bola schválená. 3. Oznámenia predsedajúceho Predsedajúci oznámil, že schôdza plánovaná na 6. a 7. októbra bola zrušená z dôvodu vypočutí komisárov. 4. Politika v oblasti hospodárskej súťaže, priemyslu a kozmického priestoru, výklad komisára Nelliho Ferociho ITRE/8/01066 Rečníci: komisár Nelli Feroci, Christian Ehler, Patrizia Toia, Hans-Olaf Henkel, Cora van Nieuwenhuizen, Neoklis Sylikiotis, Roger Helmer, Jean-Luc Schaffhauser, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Massimiliano Salini, Anne Sander, Pavel Telička, David Coburn, Theresa Griffin. PV\1035230SK.doc PE539.477v01-00 SK Zjednotení v rozmanitosti SK 5. Bezpečnosť dodávok a energetická efektívnosť, výklad komisára Oettingera ITRE/8/01064 Rečníci: komisár Oettinger, Krišjānis Kariņš, Carlos Zorrinho, Ivan Jakovčić, Morten Helveg Petersen, Miloslav Ransdorf, Claude Turmes, Dario Tamburrano, Jean-Luc Schaffhauser, Clare Moody, Jude Kirton-Darling, Janusz Lewandowski, Zigmantas Balčytis, András Gyürk, Markus Pieper, José Blanco López, Paul Rübig, Roger Helmer, Martina Werner, Marek Józef Gróbarczyk, Miriam Dalli, Maria Spyraki, Neoklis Sylikiotis. Schôdza bola prerušená o 17.44 h a pokračovalo sa v nej vo štvrtok 25. septembra 2014 o 9.10 h.
    [Show full text]