DOCSLIB.ORG

Improving Human Security for Vulnerable Communities in Southwest Serbia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Improving Human Security for Vulnerable Communities in Southwest Serbia IMPROVING HUMAN SECURITY FOR VULNERABLE COMMUNITIES IN SOUTHWEST SERBIA FULL PROPOSAL For the UN Trust Fund for Human Security (UNTFHS） UN Country Team in Serbia 1 Acronyms CSO Civil Society Organization CPs Collection Points CRDA Community Revitalization through Democratic Action EC European Commission EU European Union FOS Friends of the Sandzak GOS Government of Serbia HSU Human Security Unit IDPs Internally Displaced Persons JP Joint Programme JPM Joint Program Manager LSG Local Self Government MDG Millennium Development Goal MOV Means of Verification NGO Non-Government Organization NSDS National Sustainable Development Strategy OVI Objectively Verifiable Indicators PPES Preparedness and Planning Program PUC Public Utility Company RHDR Regional Human Development Report TOR Terms of Reference UNDAF UN Development Assistance Framework UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNFPA United Nations Population‟s Fund UNHSTF United Nations Human Security Trust Fund UNOHCHR United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights UNOPS United Nations Office for Project Services USAID US Agency for International Development WHO World Health Organization 2 Table of Contents Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 1 Basic data/ Summary ............................................................................................................................ 4 2 Executive summary ............................................................................................................................... 4 3 Introduction and rationale for funding from the UNTFHS ................................................................... 5 4 Context .................................................................................................................................................. 7 4.1 Past and current activities ............................................................................................................. 7 4.2 National and local government commitments............................................................................... 8 4.3 Project identification and formulation .......................................................................................... 9 4.4 Beneficiaries ................................................................................................................................. 9 5 Project details ...................................................................................................................................... 11 5.1 Goals and objectives ................................................................................................................... 11 5.2 Outputs and activities .................................................................................................................. 11 5.3 External factors/risk .................................................................................................................... 18 6 Sustainability ....................................................................................................................................... 18 7 Implementation and partnership strategy ............................................................................................ 20 8 Dissemination, public affairs and communications ............................................................................ 21 9 Monitoring and evaluation plan .......................................................................................................... 21 10 Administration and financial management ..................................................................................... 21 10.1 Management structure and financing arrangements ................................................................... 21 10.2 Financial reporting ...................................................................................................................... 23 10.3 Substantive reporting .................................................................................................................. 23 10.4 Work plan .................................................................................................................................... 23 11 Budget ............................................................................................................................................. 23 Annex 1 (Budget) ........................................................................................................................................ 24 Annex 2 (Logical Framework) .................................................................................................................... 25 Annex 3 (Assumption/Risk Log) ................................................................................................................ 34 Annex 4 (Work Plan) .................................................................................................................................. 37 Annex 5 Additional Information on Implementation Activities and Arrangements ................................... 40 Annex 6 (Letters of Support) ...................................................................................................................... 49 3 1 Basic data/ Summary Date of submission 29 June 2012 Benefitting country and location Serbia (southwest region) Title of the project Improving Human Security for Vulnerable Communities in southwest Serbia Duration of the project 24 months Executing UN organizations UNDP Country Office Serbia (executing) (incl. contacts in field offices) UNOPS Europe and Middle East Office (executing) WHO Country Office Serbia (executing) UNFPA (executing) Non-UN executing partner Commissioner for Protection of Equality Ministry of Environment, Mining and Spatial Planning Ministry of Human and Minority Rights, Public Administration and Local Self-Government Ombudsman Serbian Office for EU integration Municipality of Novi Pazar Project budget including PSC USD 2,859,659 2 Executive summary Southwest Serbia, commonly known as the Sandzak, is one of the most deprived areas in Serbia. It is home to a number IDPs, refugees and returnees under the readmission agreements. Living conditions of the Roma community are particularly hard. Although the Sandzak is among the youngest regions in Serbia (more than 50% of population is under the age of 30), the youth unemployment rate is 60%.The region is ethnically mixed and the two largest ethnic groups, Bosniaks and Serbs, are divided internally and disenfranchised by the central government. There is a threat of inter-ethnic and intra-communal conflict. In order to address these problems, the UN Team in Serbia will pioneer an innovative and scalable model that will employ, engage and empower vulnerable groups in southwest Serbia. This project will create jobs that will generate household income, secure access to public and social services, and promote community cohesion which will collectively enhance and strengthen human security in southwest Serbia. It will set the ground for a widespread behavioral change and for increased citizen‟s engagement in community related matters. The main project deliverables include: establishment of a formal recycling and waste collection center and cooperative, enhancement of the inter-ethnic dialogue and human rights through art, sports, culture and education and improvement of the access to services related to citizenship rights and documentation. Beneficiaries are politically disenfranchised, socially excluded and economically and culturally unempowered individuals and households in Novi Pazar and other municipalities in southwest Serbia, especially the women, youth and Roma. The number of direct beneficiaries is estimated at 60,000 women and men. 4 3 Introduction and rationale for funding from the UNTFHS Southwest Serbia borders Montenegro, Bosnia & Herzegovina and Kosovo1, and is one of the poorest regions2 in the country. In 2011 Serbia conducted its first census in a decade. Preliminary census results report 229,382 people in the Sandžak, a majority, 60%, of whom are Bosniaks, followed by 38% Serbs and 2% other ethnicities3. In 2005, The International Crisis Group (ICG)4 wrote that southwest Serbia was “vulnerable and a possible flashpoint of new violence.” Four years later, little had changed, and as a result two dozen diplomats joined U.S. Ambassador Cameron Munter in founding the “Friends of the Sandžak (FOS).” FOS provides a forum that has allied the external partners, focusing their development interventions on a region that is politically and economically isolated from Belgrade and the rest of Serbia. The ethnically diverse populations in the Sandzak communities “co- exist,” living alongside one another, studying and working in common institutions and/or organizations, but in segregated communities. Neighborhoods are divided along ethnic lines, and tensions are rising. The threat of inter-ethnic and intra-communal conflict is still simmering after a decade, and now the threat of regional conflict directed by the south at the north (Belgrade) is also increasing. The populations in the south are collectively disenfranchised from central government in Belgrade.5 Communities across southern Serbia, complain about the lack of demonstrable and deliberate action on the part of central Government. Following the tragic assassination of Prime Minister Zoran Djindjic in 2003, the succession
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Konačni Birački Spisak Članova Regionalnog Centra Kraljevo MS M
    Konačni birački spisak članova Regionalnog centra Kraljevo_MS_M Godina Regionalni Matična RB Ime (roditelj) Prezime Licenca, odnosno licence člana Komore Prebivalište mesto i opština rođenja centar sekcija 1 Aleksandar (Branko) Pejčić 1972 330H32509, 430D51209 Kruševac, Kruševac Kraljevo M 2 Aleksandar (Dobrivoje) Đorović 1972 430839105, 330B38805 Kraljevo, Kraljevo Kraljevo M 432G97512, 203059804, 330294403, 430279803, 3 Boban (B.) Petrović 1965 Makrešane, Kruševac Kraljevo M 434H21312, 381062513, 332M38413 4 Boban (Raško) Pršić 1972 434D08608, 333G92008, 332I21709, 432E32609 Kruševac, Kruševac Kraljevo M 5 Bojan (Miloica) Bogojević 1976 330F72708 Kraljevo, Kraljevo Kraljevo M 6 Božidar (Prvoslav) Novaković 1978 332J32110, 432F19510 Kraljevo, Kraljevo Kraljevo M 7 Branislav (Milenko) Dmitrović 1955 330087903, 430041503 Kraljevo, Kraljevo Kraljevo M 8 Branko (Vitor) Bogdanović 1972 430098303, 330912604 Kraljevo, Kraljevo Kraljevo M 9 Dejan (Jovan) Grković 1970 430E81410, 434E91110 Kruševac, Kruševac Kraljevo M 10 Dejan (Milorad) Marković 1972 381068613 Kruševac, Kruševac Kraljevo M 11 Dobrivoje (Svetozar) Đorović 1948 430482404, 330661904, 434B54907 Kraljevo, Kraljevo Kraljevo M 203098107, 330124003, 430019703, 381087613, 12 Dragan (Ratomir) Balšić 1965 Kraljevo, Kraljevo Kraljevo M 434K38317 13 Dragan (Živojin) Simić 1965 430B59507, 434I41914, 333N35314 Vrnjačka Banja, Vrnjačka Banja Kraljevo M 14 Dragoljub (Predrag I Malina) Marinković 1951 330B76805, 430951905 Kruševac, Kruševac Kraljevo M 15 Duško (Hranislav) Vulić 1968 330F15007
    [Show full text]
  • USAID Sustainable Local Development Project
    USAID Sustainable Local Development Project August 2013 BACKGROUND USAID’s Sustainable Local Development Project is a five-year project supporting local governments, businesses and civil society to increase their efficiency and achieve economies of scale through Inter-Municipal Cooperation (IMC) aimed at accelerating economic growth. The project’s core activities are focused on supporting inter-municipal partners to add jobs and reduce unemployment in regional economies. The project provides technical assistance, grants and subcontracts. SLDP USAID Photo: The Regional Workforce Training Center in Novi Sad was created through inter-municipal ACTIVITIES cooperation. Assisting IMC partners to add jobs by supporting private sector expansion; Strengthening public administration to enable inter-municipal business growth Project funded by: and investments; U.S. Agency for International Development; USAID/Serbia Reinforcing IMC partnerships to integrate youth equitably into local economies; Project implemented by: Chemonics International RESULTS Maxima Consulting Private sector expansion increases jobs in IMC areas: Berman Group A public-private partnership (PPP) exceeding €1 million was established by Lafarge Corporation and Beocin to create a new business park, attract Key counterparts: investors and generate new jobs in the Novi Sad-led IMC area; Government of Serbia ministries A multimedia laboratory in the Kraljevo Mechanical Engineering Faculty's and offices; Standing Conference of Business Innovation Center was furnished to help entrepreneurs acquire Towns and Municipalities (SCTM); new skills, reduce production costs and improve production processes; National Alliance for Local Value chain analysis and marketing plan improved dairy production and Economic Development (NALED); increased regional competitiveness in the Novi Pazar-led IMC area; and others A “Diversification of Agricultural Production” study recommended the introduction of new crop varieties in the Subotica-led IMC area.
    [Show full text]
  • Complex Urbarchitectonic Structures of Priština and Novi Pazar Cities
    SPATIUM International Review UDC 711.434(497.11)"19" No. 32, December 2014, pp. 39-46 Professional paper DOI: 10.2298/SPAT1432039B COMPLEX URBARCHITECTONIC STRUCTURES OF PRIŠTINA AND NOVI PAZAR CITIES Džemila Beganović1, State University of Novi Pazar, Department of Technical Sciences, Novi Pazar, Serbia Contemporary urban development has changed the traditional cities all over the world. In our region, the typical Balkan cities of oriental origin, structure and outlook were almost totally transformed in the second half of the 20th century. Modern movement brought new models of urban organization, different communication concepts and a variety of concepts of modern buildings. Among others, the idea of complex urbarchitectonic structures in urban tissue spread under specific influences and models. After a short review of modern urban development and the idea of complex urban structures, this paper explores urban transformation of less researched cities such as Priština and Novi Pazar. The focus is on the phenomenon of complex urbarchitectonic structures built in related cities in a short period from 1969-1989. Four complex urbarchitectonic structures will be presented: Kičma and complex in JNA Street in Priština and Lučne buildings and Jezero buildings in Novi Pazar. Key words: Priština, Novi Pazar, complex urbarchitectonic structure. community in one building. New building modern structures (Beganović, 2013). It INTRODUCTION: MODERN materials and technologies at the end of the culminated with the Radiant City (Ville Radieuse) MOVEMENT IN URBAN 19th century enabled the covering of lit, vast where urban functions were strictly divided DEVELOPMENT - THE IDEA OF spaces, first presented in the Crystal Palace for into parallel belts, adopted as the Functionalist COMPLEX URBARCHITECTONIC the Great Exhibition in London in 1851.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Initiatives for Improved Social Inclusion of Young Roma
    LOCAL INITIATIVES FOR IMPROVED SOCIAL INCLUSION OF YOUNG ROMA PROFILE FOCUS • Influence social and political processes Donor: Office of the United Nations High relevant to the Roma inclusion in the Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) municipalities of residence; Budget: $ 267,916 • Work with local authorities to increase Main partner: Local governments their commitment towards Roma inclusion Duration: February 2018 – December 2019 by facilitating Roma employment in local institutions (Centers for Social Work, Local Economic Development Offices, Trustee GOAL Offices for refugees and displaced persons, National Employment Service branch offices, To employ young Roma women and men in local etc.); governments and/or other governmental or non- governmental institutions at the local level. • Advocate for the interests of Roma community at the local level, by working together with CONTEXT various stakeholders to achieve sustainable results. Roma belong to the largest ethnic minority in the Republic of Serbia and are still among the most deprived communities, often facing discrimination, social exclusion and unequal access to employment, education, housing and health services. The Government of the Republic of Serbia is intensifying the work of national and local institutions dealing with social inclusion of Roma, reducing their poverty and combating discrimination, as well as creating conditions for full access to human rights. The project supports development of skills and employment of 45 young Roma in local institutions to formulate, implement and monitor Roma inclusion policies at the local level. Map of Engagement RESULTS TO DATE 45 selected young Roma increased their 27 knowledge on human rights, discrimination, legally invisible people, stateless persons, 17 18 internally displaced persons and returnees, 22 vulnerable group rights (access to social 2 20 4 welfare, employment, education), functioning 32 of mechanisms for social inclusion and Roma 24 inclusion at the local level.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kosovo* Conflict
    UNEP The UNCHS UNEP UNCHS The Joint UNEP/UNCHS (Habitat) Balkans Task Force was OCTOBER 1999 established in early May 1999 when the Kosovo conflict was Kosovo still ongoing. In addition to the unfolding humanitarian crisis there was growing concern about the environmental and human settlement consequences of the conflict. Conflict The Kosovo Conflict Ð Consequences for the Environment & Human Settlements Force UNEP/UNCHS (Habitat) Balkans Task To address these issues, the Balkans Task Force mobilised an international and independent scientific team to work within Kosovo and at targeted industrial sites in Serbia. Similar teams visited pollution sources along the Danube River, as well as Consequences targets within National Parks and other protected areas. This report presents the findings of the Balkans Task Force. Immediate action is recommended at the Ôhot spotsÕ of environmental concern found in four cities. Conscious of the need for urgent action, the United Nations Environment Programme and the United Nations Centre for Human Settlements have acted to make the facts available as rapidly as possible. The result is a major contribution to for the Environment environmental assessment of modern warfare. UNEP/UNCHS (Habitat) Balkans Task Force UNEP UNCHS & Human Settlements First published in Switzerland in 1999 by the United Nations Environment Programme and the United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat) Copyright © 1999,United Nations Environment Programme and United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat) ISBN 92-807-1801-1 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made.UNEP and UNCHS (Habitat) would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia 2Nd Periodical Report
    Strasbourg, 23 September 2010 MIN-LANG/PR (2010) 7 EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES Second periodical report presented to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe in accordance with Article 15 of the Charter SERBIA The Republic of Serbia The European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages The Second Periodical Report Submitted to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe Pursuant to Article 15 of the Charter Belgrade, September 2010 2 C O N T E N T S 1. INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………6 2. Part I …………………………………………………………………………………12 2.1. Legislative and institutional changes after the first cycle of monitoring of the implementation of the Charter …………………………………………………….12 2.1.1. Legislative changes ……………………………………………………….12 2.1.2. The National Strategy for the Improvement of the Status of Roma ……..17 2.1.3. Judicial Reform …………………………………………………………...17 2.1.4. Establishment of the Ministry of Human and Minority Rights …………..23 2.2. Novelties expected during the next monitoring cycle of the implementation of the Charter …………………………………………………………………………….24 2.2.1. The Census ………………………………………………………………..24 2.2.2. Election of the national councils of the national minorities ……………...26 2.3. Implementation of the recommendations of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe (RecChL(2009)2) 28) …………………………………………29 2.4. Activities for the implementation of the box-recommendation of the Committee of Experts with regard to the implementation of the Charter ………………………...33 3. PART II Implementation of Article 7 of the Charter ……………………………..38 3.1. Information on the policy, legislation and practice in the implementation of Part II - Article 7 of the Charter ……………………………………………………………..38 3.1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Identity Within the Sandžak Region
    WL KNO EDGE NCE ISM SA ER IS E A TE N K N O K C E N N T N I S E S J E N A 3 V H A A N H Z И O E P W O I T E D N E Z I A M I C O N O C C I O T N S H O E L C A I N M Z E N O T History and Identity within the Sandžak Region sandra king-savic CREES-FMSO 2011-2012 Research Assistantship This publication is part of a collaborative program between the Center for Russian, East European and Eurasian Studies (CREES), University of Kansas and the U.S. Foreign Military Studies Office (FMSO) at Fort Leavenworth. This analysis does not necessarily reflect the views of the FMSO. Open Source, Foreign Perspective, Underconsidered/Understudied Topics The Foreign Military Studies Office (FMSO) at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, is an open source research organization of the U.S. Army. It was founded in 1986 as an innovative program that brought together military specialists and civilian academics to focus on military and security topics derived from unclassified, foreign media. Today FMSO maintains this research tradition of special insight and highly collaborative work by conducting unclassified research on foreign perspectives of defense and security issues that are understudied or unconsidered. The Center for Russian, East European & Eurasian Studies (CREES), at the University of Kansas, is one of seventeen Title VI Comprehensive National Resource Centers for the Russian and East Central European area supported by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Postal Code Post Office Name Post Office Address 11000
    POSTAL POST OFFICE POST OFFICE POSTAL POST OFFICE POST OFFICE CODE NAME ADDRESS CODE NAME ADDRESS 11000 BEOGRAD 6 SAVSKA 2 11161 BEOGRAD 16 MIJE KOVACEVICA 7B (STUD.DOM) 11010 BEOGRAD 48 KUMODRASKA 153 11162 BEOGRAD 18 VISNJICKA 110V 11011 BEOGRAD 145 ZAPLANJSKA 32 (STADION SHOPING CENTAR) 11163 BEOGRAD 107 BACVANSKA 21 11050 BEOGRAD 22 USTANICKA 182 11164 BEOGRAD 106 SALVADORA ALJENDEA 18 11051 BEOGRAD 130 VELJKA DUGOSEVICA 19 11166 BEOGRAD 112 KRALJA MILANA 14 11052 BEOGRAD 141 BULEVAR KRALJA ALEKSANDRA 516/Z 11167 BEOGRAD 113 NJEGOSEVA 7 11060 BEOGRAD 38 PATRISA LUMUMBE 50 11168 BEOGRAD 114 KNEZA MILOSA 24 11061 BEOGRAD 139 TAKOVSKA 2 11169 BEOGRAD 115 KNEZA MILOSA 81 11101 BEOGRAD 1 TAKOVSKA 2 11210 BEOGRAD 26 ZRENJANINSKI PUT BB (KRNJACA) 11102 BEOGRAD 3 ZMAJ JOVINA 17 11211 BORCA VALJEVSKOG ODREDA 15 11103 BEOGRAD 4 NUSICEVA 16 11212 OVCA MIHAJA EMINESKUA 80 11104 BEOGRAD 5 BEOGRADSKA 8 11213 PADINSKA SKELA PADINSKA SKELA BB 11106 BEOGRAD 10 CARA DUSANA 14-16 11214 BORCA RATKA MILJICA 81 11107 BEOGRAD 11 USTANICKA 79 11215 SLANCI MARSALA TITA 50 11108 BEOGRAD 12 BULEVAR DESPOTA STEFANA 68/A 11224 VRCIN SAVE KOVACEVICA 2 11109 BEOGRAD 14 BULEVAR KRALJA ALEKSANDRA 121 11306 GROCKA BULEVAR OSLOBODJENJA 24 11110 BEOGRAD 15 MAKSIMA GORKOG 2 11307 BOLEC SMEDEREVSKI PUT BB 11111 BEOGRAD 17 BULEVAR KRALJA ALEKSANDRA 84 11308 BEGALJICA BORISA KIDRICA 211 11112 BEOGRAD 19 LOMINA 7 11309 LESTANE MARSALA TITA 60 11113 BEOGRAD 20 SAVSKA 17/A 11350 BEOGRAD 120 KATICEVA 14-18 11114 BEOGRAD 21 UCITELJSKA 60 11351 VINCA PROFESORA VASICA 172 11115 BEOGRAD 23 BULEVAR OSLOBODJENJA 51 11430 UMCARI TRG REPUBLIKE 1 11116 BEOGRAD 28 RUZVELTOVA 21 11030 BEOGRAD 8 SUMADIJSKI TRG 2/A 11117 BEOGRAD 29 GOSPODAR JEVREMOVA 17 11031 BEOGRAD 131 BULEVAR VOJVODE MISICA 12 (EUROSALON) 11118 BEOGRAD 32 MAKSIMA GORKOG 89 11040 BEOGRAD 33 NEZNANOG JUNAKA 2/A 11119 BEOGRAD 34 MILESEVSKA 66 11090 BEOGRAD 75 PILOTA MIHAJLA PETROVICA 8-12 11120 BEOGRAD 35 KRALJICE MARIJE 5 11091 BEOGRAD 109 17.
    [Show full text]
  • Sandzak – a Region That Is Connecting Or Dividing Serbia and Montenegro?
    SANDZAK – A REGION THAT IS CONNECTING OR DIVIDING SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO? Sandzak is a region that is divided among Serbia and Montenegro. Six municipalities are in Serbia (Novi Pazar, Sjenica, Tutin, Prijepolje, Priboj and Nova Varoš) and six in Montenegro (Bijelo Polje, Rožaje, Berane, Pljevlja, Gusinje and Plav). On the basis of the 1991 census the number of the inhabitants of Sandzak included 420.000 people – 278.000 in Serbia and 162.000 in Montenegro, of which 54% are Muslims by ethnicity. Sandzak, which is carrying its name after a Turkish word for a military district, constituted a part of the Bosnian Pashalik within the Ottoman Empire until the year 1878. On the Berlin Congress, which was held at the same year, the great powers decided to leave Sandzak within the framework of the Ottoman Empire, but have allowed Austro- Hungary to deploy their forces in a part of this region. Through an agreement between the kings of Serbia Peter I. Karadjordjevic and of Montenegro Nikola I. Petrovic, but thanks to Russia, Serbia and Montenegro took control over Sandzak in the First Balkan War of 1912. Up to the Balkan Wars in 1912 and 1913, Sandzak represented a separate administrative unit with the administration and cultural center being in Novi Pazar. After the end of the Balkan Wars the process of emigration of the Bosniac population to Turkey continued and through the port of Bar left for Turkey in the period between April and June 1914 some 16.500 Bosniacs from the Montenegrin part of Sandzak and some 40.000 from the Serbian part.
    [Show full text]
  • Rešenje O Ustanovljavanju Ribarskih Područja
    REŠENJE O USTANOVLJAVANJU RIBARSKIH PODRUČJA ("Sl. glasnik RS", br. 90/2015) 1. Na teritoriji Republike Srbije ustanovljavaju se sledeća ribarska područja: 1) Ribarsko područje "Južna Morava 1" Ribarsko područje "Južna Morava 1" ustanovljava se na ribolovnim vodama vodotoka reka: Binačka Morava, Preševska Moravica, Južna Morava od nastanka do ušća Barbeške reke (kod mesta Zaplanjska Toponica), Pčinja, Dragovištica, Jerma, Veternica, Vlasina, reka Jablanica od administrativne granice između opštine Lebane i grada Leskovca do ušća, reka Nišava od državne granice sa Republikom Bugarskom do granice Parka prirode "Sićevačka klisura" i svih ostalih pritoka navedenih reka i drugih prirodnih ili veštačkih ribolovnih voda koje su u granicama ribarskog područja, osim ribolovnih voda u okviru granica zaštićenih područja. Granica ribarskog područja polazi od tromeđe grada Niša, opštine Svrljig i opštine Bela Palanka i ide administrativnom granicom između ove dve opštine do Svrljiškog Timoka i dalje njegovom levom obalom do izvorišta, zatim severnom administrativnom granicom opštine Pirot do državne granice sa Republikom Bugarskom. Granica dalje ide na jug državnim granicama Republike Bugarske i BJR Makedonije, zatim ka severu zapadnim administrativnim granicama opština Preševo, Bujanovac, grada Vranja i grada Leskovca, nastavlja desnom obalom Puste reke do administrativne granice grada Leskovca, dalje prati severnu administrativnu granicu grada Leskovca i opštine Vlasotince, zapadnu administrativnu granicu opština Babušnica i Bele Palanke, do polazne tačke. Ribarsko područje "Južna Morava" prostire se na teritorijama sledećih jedinica lokalnih samouprava: grad Vranje, grad Leskovac, opština Preševo, opština Bujanovac, opština Trgovište, opština Bosilegrad, opština Surdulica, opština Vladičin Han, opština Crna Trava, opština Vlasotince, opština Babušnica, opština Dimitrovgrad, opština Pirot i opština Bela Palanka. Ribarsko područje "Južna Morava 1" koristi se za rekreativni ribolov.
    [Show full text]
  • R.Br. Opština Mesto Adresa Prodavnice 1 Ada Obornjača Ada
    R.br. Opština Mesto Najbliža prodavnica Adresa prodavnice 1 Ada Obornjača Ada Save Kovačevida 7 2 Aleksandrovac Bratidi Aleksandrovac 29. novembra 28 3 Aleksandrovac Bzenice Aleksandrovac 29. novembra 28 4 Aleksandrovac Koznica Aleksandrovac 29. novembra 28 5 Aleksandrovac Rogavčina Aleksandrovac 29. novembra 28 6 Aranđelovac Progoreoci Aranđelovac Knjaza Miloša 182 7 Babušnica Bogdanovac Vlasotince Nemanjina 47 8 Babušnica Ostatovica Vlasotince Nemanjina 47 9 Bačka Topola Bagremovo Bačka Topola Glavna 6 10 Bačka Topola Bogaraš Bačka Topola Glavna 6 11 Bačka Topola Kavilo Bačka Topola Glavna 6 12 Bačka Topola Midunovo Bačka Topola Glavna 6 13 Bačka Topola Obornjača Bačka Topola Glavna 6 14 Bačka Topola Srednji Salaš Bačka Topola Glavna 6 15 Bačka Topola Zobnatica Bačka Topola Glavna 6 16 Bajina Bašta Mala Reka Bajina bašta Vuka Karadzida 17 17 Bajina Bašta Zaugline Bajina bašta Vuka Karadzida 17 18 Bela Crkva Kaluđerovo Vršac Trg pobede 4 19 Bela Palanka Crveni Breg Pirot Trg pirotskih oslobodilaca bb 20 Bela Palanka Dolac (selo) Pirot Trg pirotskih oslobodilaca bb 21 Bela Palanka Donja Glama Pirot Trg pirotskih oslobodilaca bb 22 Bela Palanka Gornji Rinj Pirot Trg pirotskih oslobodilaca bb 23 Bela Palanka Leskovik Pirot Trg pirotskih oslobodilaca bb 24 Bela Palanka Telovac Pirot Trg pirotskih oslobodilaca bb 25 Bojnik Borince Lebane Cara Dušana, lamela 2 26 Bojnik Dobra Voda Lebane Cara Dušana, lamela 2 27 Bojnik Gornje Brijanje Lebane Cara Dušana, lamela 2 28 Bojnik Ivanje Lebane Cara Dušana, lamela 2 29 Bojnik Obražda Lebane Cara Dušana, lamela 2 30 Bojnik Orane Lebane Cara Dušana, lamela 2 31 Bosilegrad Brankovci Surdulica Kralja Petra 24 32 Bosilegrad Gložje Surdulica Kralja Petra 24 33 Bosilegrad Grujinci Surdulica Kralja Petra 24 34 Bosilegrad Izvor Surdulica Kralja Petra 24 35 Bosilegrad Milevci Surdulica Kralja Petra 24 36 Bosilegrad Zli Dol Surdulica Kralja Petra 24 37 Brus Grad Aleksandrovac 29.
    [Show full text]
  • Odluka O Odredjivanju Zona I Najopremljenije Zone U Gradu
    Strana 24 - Broj 9 SKUPŠTINA GRADA NOVOG PAZARA Novi Pazar, 27.11.2015. 218. 12E), Rifata Budrževića od početka ulice do raskrsnice sa ul. Deda Šehovića i Ramiza Na osnovu člana 6. i 7a. i člana 38b. Koce (do broja 63-neparno i broja 38- Zakona o porezima na imovinu („Sl.glasnik parno), Kej Mira, Dede Šehovića od Republike Srbije“ br. 26/01, 45/02, 80/03, raskrsnice sa ul. Rifata Burdževića do 135/04, 61/07, 101/10, 24/11, 78/11, 57/12- raskrsnice sa ul. Šabana Koče. Prvog Maja US, 47/13 i 68/14-dr.zakon) i člana 41. stav od početka do raskrsnice sa ulicom Rasima 1. tačke 3. i 16. Statuta grada Novog Pazara Halilovića, 7. Jula do raskrsnice sa ul. Dr („Sl.list grada Novog Pazara“, br.4/2013- Tirše, Trg Isabega Isabegovića, Jošanički kej prečišćen tekst …01/2015), Skupština grada od pijace do raskrsnice sa ulicom Vuka Novog Pazara na sednici održanoj dana Karadžića (od br. 2 do br. 20) i Vuka 27.11.2015. godine, donela je Karadžića. Druga zona obuhvata ulice: ODLUKU Beogradska, Borisa Kidriča, Dalmatinska, O ODREĐIVANJU ZONA I Dede Šehovića od raskrsnice sa ul.Šabana NAJOPREMLJENIJE ZONE U GRADU Koče do kraja ulice, Dr Tirše, Dvanaeste NOVOM PAZARU srpske brigade, Generala Živkovića od početka do raskrsnice sa ulicom Radnička (do broja 1 do broja 51-neparno i od broja 2 Član 1. do broja 58-parno), Gojka Bačanina, Hilma Ovom odlukom utvrđuju se zone i Rožajca, Isabega Isabegovića, Ive Lole najopremljenija zona u gradu Novom Robara, JNA, Jugovića, Jošanički kej od Pazaru.
    [Show full text]