DOCSLIB.ORG

California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE) 2014-2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE) 2014-2015 California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE) 2014-2015 Training Manual for Site Test Coordinators 450 380 350 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS Page Table of Contents 2 Training Agenda 3 What is the CAHSEE? 4 2014-15 OUSD CAHSEE Calendar 5 CAHSEE Eligibility Guidelines 6 Check-In Schedule 7 Responsibilities of Site CAHSEE Coordinators and Staff 8 5 Steps to Make the CAHSEE Easier Step 1: Before Test Materials Arrive Step 2: When Test Materials Arrive 9-15 Step 3: Time Between Test Arrival and the Testing Day Step 4: On the Testing Day Step 5: After Testing ETS Visits and Audits 16 Missing Student Address Query and Report in Aeries 17-18 CAHSEE Status Report 19-21 Special Education News 22 Options for Students Not Passing CAHSEE 23-24 FORMS and Documents for Handling and Returning Materials 25 • CAHSEE –Test Security Agreement 26 • CAHSEE-Test Security Affidavit 27 • Documentation for Uncooperative Student 28 • 9th Grade Letter 29 • CAHSEE Inventory Form 30 • Test Administration Incident Report Form 31 • Test Security Breach Report Form 32 • Request for Additional CAHSEE Materials 33 • Returning Test Materials to the Warehouse Checklist 34 • Directions on how to hand-grid blank answer documents 35 • Box Packing Directions for Scorable Materials 36 • Box Packing Directions for Non-Scorable Materials 37 • Principal’s Verification of Non-Scorable Materials Returned 38 • CAHSEE Roster 2014-15 39 • CAHSEE Apportionment Record 40 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 41 APPENDICES 42 A: Resources and Web Sites 43 B: SAMPLES of Answer Document 44-49 2 CAHSEE Training for Site Coordinators Location: 900 High Street OUSD Warehouse Rear Loading Dock Training 1: Date: September 29, 2014 Time: 3:30-5:30 p.m. OR Training 2: Date: September 30, 2014 Time: 3:30-5:30 p.m. Training Agenda I. Welcome, Introduction, Housekeeping II. What is the CAHSEE? III. What’s new this year? III. Paperwork for Success IV. Warehouse Check-in Process V. Q & A VI. Evaluation 3 What is the CAHSEE? The primary purpose of the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE), Senate Bill 2 of 1999 enactment, is to significantly improve pupil achievement in public high schools and to ensure that pupils who graduate from public high schools can demonstrate grade level competency in reading, writing, and mathematics. The CAHSEE also identifies students who are not developing skills that are essential for life after high school and encourages districts to give these students the attention and resources needed to help them achieve these skills during their high school years. All California public school students must satisfy the CAHSEE requirement, as well as all other state and local requirements, in order to receive a high school diploma. The CAHSEE has two parts: English-language arts (ELA) and mathematics. The ELA part addresses state content standards through grade ten. In reading, this includes vocabulary, decoding, comprehension, and analysis of information and literary texts. In writing, this covers writing strategies, applications, and the conventions of English (e.g. grammar, spelling, and punctuation). The mathematics part of the CAHSEE addresses state standards in grades six and seven and Algebra I. The exam includes statistics, data analysis and probability, number sense, measurement and geometry, mathematical reasoning, and algebra. Students are also asked to demonstrate a strong foundation in computation and arithmetic, including working with decimals, fractions, and percents. The CAHSEE requirement can be satisfied by passing both parts of the exam in ELA and Math with a score of 350 each. Scores for the CAHSEE range from 275 to 450. A minimum score of 350 is needed to pass each part of the CAHSEE, while a score of 380 or higher demonstrates a student’s proficiency. A student has to score above 405 for ELA to be considered advanced. For Mathematics, an advanced score is 425 or higher. Although these scores can vary slightly for each test administration, the aforementioned scores do reflect very closely the skill levels of students. At the very least, students should aim to pass, but doing so with proficiency is ideal. The passing rate of 10th grade students helps determine the API rating. The ELA includes multiple choice questions that comprise 80% of the total test, and the essay response is comprised of the other 20% of the ELA score. The mathematics part of the test is comprised of multiple choice questions. Both ELA and mathematics are split into two separate sessions during the course of two consecutive days of administration. The statistics for each administration vary slightly and you can access up-to-date data at the CDE’s CAHSEE web-site, http://cahsee.cde.ca.gov/page2.asp?subject=ExitExam&level=District&submit1= Submit or at http://www.ets.org/cahsee/interpret_scores/. 2014-15 OUSD CAHSEE Calendar English Language Arts* Mathematics* Warehouse Who is eligible to test? (ELA) (Math) Check-In** • RETEST for 12th & post-12th July 22, 2014*** July 23, 2014 July 24, 2014 graders (Adult students) needing to pass any part of the CAHSEE • ELA on 7/22 and Math on 7/23 • RETEST for 11th, 12th & post- October 7, 2014 October 8, 2014 October 9, 2014 12th graders • ELA on 10/7 and Math on 10/8 December 6, 2014 December 13, December 8, (Saturday 2014 2014, (All ELA • RETEST for 12th & post-12th Administration) (Saturday materials ); graders Administration) December 15, • ELA on 12/6 & Math on 12/13 2014 (All materials) • INITIAL/Census for 10th February 3, 2015 February 4, February 5, 2015 graders th th 2015 • RETEST for 12 & post-12 graders • ELA on 2/3 and Math on 2/4 • MAKE-UP for 10th graders March 17, 2015 March 18, 2015 March 19, 2015 absent during the February administration • INITIAL for new 10th grade enrollees • RETEST for 11th, 12th & post- 12th graders • ELA on 3/17 and Math on 3/19 *All tests are Tuesdays for ELA and Wednesdays for Math, except for the December 2014 Administration when the ELA test will be on Saturday, December 6, 2014, and the Math test will be on Saturday, December 13, 2014. All of December’s ELA materials are due at the warehouse on Monday, December 8 (unless specified by IEP/504 plan); all of December’s materials are due at the warehouse on Monday, December 15 (unless specified by IEP/504 plan) ** Please return all scorable and non-scorable documents to the rear dock of the 900 High Street Warehouse promptly during check-in time (Page 7). ***CAHSEE results are usually ready 7-8 weeks after administration date. 5 2014-15 OUSD CAHSEE Eligibility Guidelines Grade Description of Guideline 10 Eligible to take the CAHSEE once per school year, either in February or March 2015 11 Eligible to take any part of the CAHSEE not passed two times per school year 12 Eligible to take any part of the CAHSEE not passed up to five times per school year Adult Students (Classes of Eligible to take any part of the CAHSEE not passed as 2013 & 2014) many as three times per school year until passed No student may retake any part of the CAHSEE already passed. 6 R A D O U S D CAHSEE Check-In Schedule October 9, 2014____ December 8 and 15, 2014 (MONDAYS) _____ February 5, 2015_____ March 19, 2015______ Time Station 1 Station 2 9:00 a.m. Oakland Comm. Day 9:15 a.m. Dewey Bunche 9: 45 a.m. Gateway to College Life 10:15 a.m. Oakland International Street Academy 10:45 a.m. Rudsdale McClymonds Lunch 1:00 p.m. Castlemont Oakland Tech 1:45 p.m. Met West Skyline 2:00 p.m. Oakland High Fremont 2:45 p.m. Coliseum College Prep Independent Study Please check-in at assigned or available station. The warehouse number is 434-2213. 7 Responsibilities of Site CAHSEE Coordinators and Staff • Attend a formal training session conducted by the District’s CAHSEE Coordinator • Read and sign a Test Security Agreement for Site Test (CAHSEE) Coordinator (Page 40 of Local Educational Agency and Test Site Coordinator’s Manual (LEATSCM) or Page 26 of this manual) • Read and sign a Test Security Affidavit and be familiar with the test security procedures (Page 48-49 of LEATSCM or page 27 of this Training Manual) • Read and review the test administration manual prior to testing and be familiar with the testing procedures • Provide training at school site • Check out testing materials (count and sign for them) each morning before the testing session begins • Prepare to accommodate and/or modify for students with IEPs or 504 plans • Assist in verifying the identity of students to be tested on testing days • Ensure that students fill in the test version number and test booklet serial number on the answer document pages 3 & 9, also check to ensure that students fill in the field on answer document page 9, “Mathematics Classes Taken”: 7 8 9 10 11 12 О О О О О О General math О О О О О О Pre-Algebra О О О О О О Algebra 1 О О О О О О Geometry О О О О О О Algebra 2 О О О О О О Integrated Mathematics Course I О О О О О О Integrated mathematics Course II О О О О О О Integrated mathematics Course III О О О О О О Advanced Mathematics Courses • Make sure that students sign and date their answer documents in Box 1 • Follow test administration instructions • Read script word-for-word • Actively monitor the students to make sure that they are doing their own work • Respond to cheating incidents and follow procedures as laid out in the manual 8 • Collect and account for answer documents and test booklets after each testing day • Report any testing irregularities (incidents) by completing a Test Administration Incident Report Form (Page 58 on Directions for Administration (DFA), or page 31 in this manual), or Test Security Breach Report Form (Page 61 of DFA, or page 32 of this manual or) if applicable and notify the District CAHSEE Coordinator • At no time should the test materials be left alone with students FIVE STEPS TO MAKE THE CAHSEE EASIER Step 1: Before Test Materials Arrive A.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Holding Students to Account by Paul E. Peterson
    CHAPTER 7 Holding Students to Account Paul E. Peterson The American high school is troubled. Not only do US high school students’ performances trail those of students in most other indus- trialized nations, but there are few signs of improvement within the United States. While pupils in fourth grade have made striking gains over the past couple of decades, the gains attenuate by eighth grade and disappear altogether in high school. Even the most tal- ented high school students don’t always do well. Only 7 percent of US students score at or above the advanced level in mathematics, as compared to twice that percentage on the part of Canadians, Germans, Finns, Dutch, Belgians, and Japanese. Students in high- flying places such as Korea, Switzerland, and Singapore do even better.1 Many students graduate from high school without the req- uisite skills needed to perform successfully in a modern, industrial- ized society. Approximately 1.7 million college students must take remedial courses, a clear indication that high school graduates have not acquired a minimum set of cognitive skills. The causes are multiple, and no one fix will address them all. But flaws in the country’s student accountability system are a Copyright © 2014 by the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. All rights reserved. FinnSousa_WhatLiesAhead.indb 119 12/19/13 8:15 AM 120 Holding Students to Account likely contributing factor. Unlike most countries that have high- performing students, the United States lacks, as do most states within the United States, a set of exit exams, that is, subject- specific examinations students are expected to take as their careers in secondary schools are concluding.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Test Programs, Alternate Pathways, and Pass Rates November 2009 Credits and Acknowledgments
    State High School Exit Exams: ® Trends in Test Programs, Alternate Pathways, and Pass Rates November 2009 Credits and Acknowledgments This report was researched and written by Ying Zhang, CEP research associate. Jack Jennings, CEP’s president and CEO, co-authored the recommendations and provided advice and guidance. Diane Stark Rentner, CEP’s national program director, and NancyKoberand NaomiChudowsky,CEPconsultants, gave helpful comments to the report. Jennifer McMurrer,CEP research associate, assisted in verifying and editing the report and state pro- files. Rebecca Barns, CEP consultant, edited the report and the state profiles. Laura Sobchik, CEP intern, assist- ed in data entry and verification. Jody Peltason, CEP intern, provided general assistance on the report. The Center on Education Policy extends its deepest gratitude to the officials in the 26 states who responded to our state survey on exit exams, verified the information in the state profiles, and answered other questions about exit exam policies. Without their assistance, this report would not have been possible. We would also like to thank Keith Gayler, CEP consultant, who helped with the development of the state survey, andthreeexternalreviewerswhoprovidedinsightfulcommentsandsuggestions:Dr.DavidConley,professorand director,Center for Education Policy Research, University of Oregon; Dr. John Robert Warren, professor, University of Minnesota; and Dr. Lauress Wise, principal scientist, the Human Resources Research Organization (HumRRO). The Center draws on general support resources from the George Gund Foundation and the Phi Delta Kappa International Foundation. The statements made and the views expressed in this report are solely the respon- sibility of the Center. www.cep-dc.org Table of Contents Summary ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Policy Context of High School Exit Exams: a Review of the Literature from 2006 to 2018
    UNDERSTANDING THE POLICY CONTEXT OF HIGH SCHOOL EXIT EXAMS: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE FROM 2006 TO 2018 Hannah Poquette Aaron Butler Working Paper November, 2018 KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 300 Sower Boulevard, Fifth Floor Frankfort, KY 40601 Executive Summary The Kentucky Board of Education is currently considering changes to Kentucky’s high school graduation requirement policy to address concerns that Kentucky students are not graduating with the skills necessary to ensure their success after high school. A key component of this policy change would require students to pass a high school exit exam before receiving a diploma. The most recent data on high exit exam policies show that approximately one out of four states require students to pass an exit exam (Center on Education Policy, 2012). These exit exam policies have varied widely in their implementation and characteristics. Empirical evidence from studies examining exit exams demonstrates that choices made when crafting the policy and establishing the exam may greatly affect the success of the policy and should be carefully considered. This literature review synthesizes evidence addressing characteristics of the Kentucky exit exam policy. These characteristics include (a) student outcomes of underperforming and underserved populations, (b) level of exit exam difficulty, (c) inclusion of multiple subject areas in exit exams, and (d) inclusion of alternative pathways to graduation. Exit Exams and Outcomes for Underperforming and Underserved Students Research evidence suggests that students at the lower end of the achievement distribution, racial/ethnic minority students, or low income students may not see distinct improvements in their outcomes due to the implementation of an exit exam.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical Competencies in High School Exit
    Mathematical Competencies in High School Exit Examinations and in TIMSS/III Kahnert, Eickelmann, Bos & Endberg – Validation of High Stakes-Testing Through an International Large Scale Assessment Instrument MATHEMATICAL COMPETENCIES IN HIGH SCHOOL EXIT EXAMINATIONS AND IN TIMSS/III – VALIDATION OF HIGH STAKES- TESTING THROUGH AN INTERNATIONAL LARGE SCALE ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT Julia Kahnert, Birgit Eickelmann, Wilfried Bos & Manuela Endberg Institute for School Development Research, TU Dortmund University, Germany Abstract In Germany students gain access to universities by passing the high school exit examination (Abitur). By using probabilistic scaling methods, this study examines whether central high school exit examinations as a form of high- stakes testing allow for valid information in measuring competencies. For this approach a cohort of students simultaneously took their high school exit examinations in mathematics and the TIMSS/III-test (Mullis et al., 1998). Both instruments entail information about students’ mathematical competencies. The presented study establishes in how far both results are comparable and which consequences for high-stakes testing as well as for TIMSS/III can be deduced. Introduction, Background, and Objectives of Study The presented research project is conducted as a sub-project for the project “Quality management of central examinations” organized by the Institute of School Development Research at Dortmund University. The project is funded by the school ministry in North Rhine-Westphalia. Data was collected in the survey period during February and March 2011. This paper deals with the topic of high school exit examinations as a certain form of high-stakes testing in Germany. Exemplarily for the subject mathematics, students’ performance data was collected and analysed.
    [Show full text]
  • High School Exit Examinations and State-Level Completion and GED Rates, 1973-2000*
    High School Exit Examinations and State-Level Completion and GED Rates, 1973-2000* Version: October 2004 John Robert Warren Department of Sociology University of Minnesota Krista N. Jenkins Department of Sociology University of Pennsylvania Rachael B. Kulick Department of Sociology University of Minnesota Working Paper No. 2005-08 https://doi.org/10.18128/MPC2005-08 WORKING DRAFT: PLEASE DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE WITHOUT PERMISSION *Paper prepared for presentation at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Boston, April 2004. Support for this project has been provided by the Spencer Foundation’s Major Grants Program and by the University of Minnesota’s Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program. We are also very grateful to Christopher Uggen, Dean Lillard, Jennifer C. Lee, Daniel Koretz, Robert Hauser, and several anonymous reviewers for their helpful advice and feedback. However, errors and omissions are the responsibility of the authors. Please direct correspondence to John Robert Warren, Department of Sociology, University of Minnesota, 909 Social Sciences, 267 ~ 19th Ave. South, Minneapolis, MN 55455 or email [email protected]. High School Exit Examinations and State-Level Completion and GED Rates, 1973-2000 ABSTRACT We investigate the extent to which high school exit examinations are associated with state-level high school completion rates in the United States. To do so, we estimate a series of state and year fixed effects models using a new measure of state-level high school completion rates and archival information about states’ high school exit examinations between 1973 and 2000. We find that high school exit examinations --- particularly more difficult examinations that have recently been implemented in some states --- are associated with lower high school completion rates and higher rates of General Educational Development (GED) test taking.
    [Show full text]
  • PB-Exit Exams.Id
    M AY 2003 making sure graduation tests exit exams g e t a PA S S I N G G R A D E The trend is clear: By 2008, half the states are likely to have adopted high school exit exams.1 These exams, which students must pass to graduate, are part of state accountability systems, above and beyond the requirements of the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. The main intent is to boost the value and credibility of a high school diploma and, in the process, motivate students to work harder. In some states, the exit exam is designed to guarantee that those who pass are prepared for college entrance; in others, it is intended to guarantee that graduates have mastered agreed-upon basic skills. Often, however, exit exams are implemented without have the most to gain from efforts to hold schools ac- adequate commitment to ensuring student success or countable. Graduation and other high-stakes tests can sufficient attention to the costs of student failure. In such focus attention on how a system is failing to serve all cases, one unplanned outcome may be high failure rates, students.3 However, critics say that a high-stakes exit exam especially for poor and minority students. Another risk places the onus, wrongly, on students, whose schools may is increased dropout rates, fueled by the frustration of not have offered them sufficient opportunities to learn what is needed to pass the exam. The worry is that poor students who have failed or who simply expect to fail.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009-10 Academic Year
    Accreditation Lindsey Wilson College is accredited by the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (1866 Southern Lane, Decatur, Georgia 30033-4097; Telephone number 404- 679-4501) to award the Associate of Arts, Bachelor of Arts, Bachelor of Science, Master of Arts, and Master of Education Degrees. The College is also accredited by the University Senate of The United Methodist Church. The Master of Education in Counseling and Human Development is accredited through the Council for the Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP). The Bachelor of Arts in Education and the Master of Education for Rank II Change is accredited by the Kentucky Educational Professional Standards Board (EPSB) and the Council on Postsecondary Education (CPE). The Bachelor of Arts in Business Administration is accredited by the International Assembly of College Business Education (IACBE). The Lindsey Wilson College School of Professional Counseling Program has been granted the following accreditation/ authorization from state authorities: The Ohio Board of Regents has accredited the bachelor’s degree in Human Services and Counseling and the masters of education in Counseling and Human Development at Cincinnati Technical and Community College in Cincinnati at Cincinnati State Community College and at Southern State Community College in Hillsboro. The Tennessee Board of Regents has approved the application by the School of Professional Counseling to offer the bachelors and masters degree programs in Tennessee. The West Virginia Higher Education Authority has accredited the programs at Logan Community College in Logan. The State Council of Higher Education for Virginia (SCHEV) has accredited the programs at Mountain Empire Community College in Big Stone Gap, at Southwestern Community College in Richlands and at Wytheville Community College in Wytheville.
    [Show full text]
  • Coming to Terms: a Theory of Writing Assessment
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All USU Press Publications USU Press 2004 Coming to Terms: A Theory of Writing Assessment Patricia Lynne Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs Part of the Rhetoric and Composition Commons Recommended Citation Lynne, Patricia, "Coming to Terms: A Theory of Writing Assessment" (2004). All USU Press Publications. 149. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs/149 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the USU Press at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All USU Press Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Coming to A Theory of Terms Writing Assessment PATRICIA LYNNE COMING TO TERMS COMING TO TERMS Theorizing Writing Assessment in Composition Studies PATRICIA LYNNE UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS Logan, Utah Utah State University Press Logan, Utah 84322–7800 © 2004 Utah State University Press All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America Cover by Tom Child Designs Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lynne, Patricia, 1964– Coming to terms : theorizing writing assessment in composition studies / by Patricia Lynne. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0–87421–585–4 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. English language--Composition and exercises--Evaluation. 2. English language--Composition and exercises--Study and teaching (Secondary) 3. English language--Rhetoric--Evaluation. 4. Constructivism
    [Show full text]
  • International Comparisons of Entrance and Exit Examinations: Japan, United Kingdom, France, and Germany
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 412 289 TM 027 787 AUTHOR Stevenson, Harold W.; Lee, Shin-ying TITLE International Comparisons of Entrance and Exit Examinations: Japan, United Kingdom, France, and Germany. INSTITUTION Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC. Media and Information Services. REPORT NO ORAD-97-1110 PUB DATE 1997-09-00 NOTE 58p.; "In collaboration with Solange Carton, Margaret Evans, Samia Meziane, Naoko Moriyoshi, Ian Schmidt." PUB TYPE Reports Evaluative (142) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Academic Achievement; Admission (School); College Bound Students; *College Entrance Examinations; Comparative Analysis; Cross Cultural Studies; Developed Nations; Educational Attainment; Foreign Countries; *High School Students; High Schools; Higher Education; *International Education; *Student Educational Objectives; Test Construction; *Test Use; Vocational Education IDENTIFIERS *Exit Examinations; France; Germany; Japan; United Kingdom ABSTRACT The roles of exit examinations (high school exit) and college entrance examinations in four industrialized countries are described. Information was obtained from reviews of educational systems and interviews with small samples of students (at least seven or eight students), parents, and teachers during 1993. All four countries studied, Japan, Germany, France, and the United Kingdom, are experiencing a common problem in that their universities, built to educate a moderate percentage of the population, are being asked to accommodate increasing numbers of students. They are left with the alternatives of restricting enrollments to make the universities more elitist or expanding enrollments and watering down the value of the university degree. In all of these countries, entrance and exit examinations are based on a curriculum established by ministries of education. These examinations are closely tied to what students have studied in school.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcgraw-HILL EDUCATION the Mcgraw-Hill Companies Trends in Pre-K–16 Education
    McGRAW-HILL EDUCATION The McGraw-Hill Companies Trends in Pre-K–16 Education Creating a Skilled Workforce to Compete in the Global Knowledge Economy Government and business communities throughout the United States recognize that they must do a better job of building and maintaining a skilled workforce to compete successfully in the global knowledge economy.The level of innovation needed to retain our society’s competitiveness is directly linked to the mathematical, scientific, and technological skills attained by today’s students. Even with reauthorization of the No Child Left Behind Act pending in Congress, it is clear that NCLB has helped revitalize the states’ role in education. States are holding schools more accountable for improving academic achievement and raising measurement standards. With the value of education growing nationwide, McGraw-Hill Education will continue to provide a diverse range of print and digital solutions to help teachers improve and measure student performance. At the time of publication of the 2008-2009 Investor Fact Book it is too early in the legislative session to predict whether NCLB will be reauthorized before the end of 2008. Many observers predict that no major action will be taken until after the 2008 presidential election. However, significant programs mandated by No Child Left Behind have been funded for FY 2008 at levels slightly higher than those provided in the prior fiscal-year budget. High School Exit Examinations – States Taking Action to Better Prepare Students A growing number of states are adopting exit exams to better assess the quality of their educational programs to ensure that graduates have the skills necessary to enter the workforce and college.
    [Show full text]
  • English-Language Arts Teacher Guide
    English-Language Arts Teacher Guide California High School Exit Examination California Department of Education 2008 California High School Exit Examination English–Language Arts Teacher Guide © 2008 California Department of Education (CDE) Permission is granted in advance for reproduction of these resources for educational purposes. The content must remain unchanged and in its entirety as published by the California Department of Education. To obtain permission to reproduce the information (text or graphics) contained in this document or any other CDE materials for any commercial purpose, submit the specifi cs of your request in writing to the Copyright Program Offi ce, California Department of Education, CDE Press, 1430 N Street, Suite 3410, Sacramento, CA 95814. Fax: 916-322-1754 Questions about this document should be directed to CDE’s High School Exit Examination Offi ce at 916-445-9449. Please note that any privately copyrighted reading passages contained in any CDE materials or on the CDE’s Web site may not be put into publications for sale or otherwise. To obtain permission and terms of use for privately copyrighted material, contact the copyright holder. This printing of the English–Language Arts Teacher Guide contains the following privately copyrighted passages: A Brain Divided (© 1984 by Harcourt, Inc.) A Day Away (Random House) Acting Up [The ALAN Review 24(3): 42–46] California H i g h S c h o o l E x i t Examination Contents Introduction 1 Purpose and Content 2 Overview of the Strands 4 Reading Constructs Measured by the CAHSEE 5 Writing Constructs Measured by the CAHSEE 6 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016-2017 Catalog
    2016-2017 Catalog 702 W. Town & Country Rd. Orange, CA 92868 Phone (714) 437-9697 Fax (714) 437-9356 www.CNICollege.edu [email protected] January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017 Published January 1, 2016 2016-2017 CATALOG MESSAGE TO STUDENTS Dear New Student, Welcome to CNI College! We are delighted that you have chosen CNI College as your learning institution. Everyone associated with CNI College is looking forward to working with you and providing the guidance necessary to assist you in your future endeavors. This Catalog has been designed to answer your questions about school policies, regulations and academic expectations. We ask that you read your Catalog and sign the statement in your orientation packet provided to you acknowledging that you have received a copy. Remember, your future begins here at CNI College. Your new profession will require you to adhere to professional standards and behavior as will CNI College during your training. The faculty and administration wish you the very best success. James Buffington President/CEO, CNI College ii 2016-2017 CATALOG CNI College Core Values Achieve the Highest Integrity at All Times Provide Excellence at Every Opportunity Practice Dignity, Respect, Humility, and Justice at All Times Create an Environment of Positive Forward Thinking and Fun Energy Contribute to the Highest Good of the Community and Employers That We Serve Embrace and Drive Change with Passion iii 2016-2017 CATALOG Table of Contents CNI College Core Values………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….iii Table
    [Show full text]