Ad 1400–1700

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ad 1400–1700 2009 FROM SANTA ELENA TO ST. AUGUSTINE: INDIGENOUS CERAMIC VARIABILITY FROM SANTA ELENA TO ST. AUGUSTINE: INDIGENOUS CERAMIC VARIABILITY (A.D. 1400–1700) KATHLEEN DEAGAN AND DAVID HURST THOMAS Editors and contributors WITH CONTRIBUTIONS BY KEITH H. ASHLEY , CHESTER B. DEPRATTER , REBECCA SAUNDERS , GIFFORD J. WATERS , MAR K WILLIA M S , AND JOHN E. WORTH Proceedings of the Second Caldwell Conference St. Catherines Island, Georgia March 30–April 1, 2007 ANTHROPOLOGICAL PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY Number 90, 229 pages, 77 figures, 42 tables Issued August 26, 2009 Copyright © American Museum of Natural History 2009 ISSN 0065-9452 2009 ETHNICITY AND CERAMICS ON THE SOUTHEASTERN ATLANTIC COAST 179 CHAPTER 8 ETHNICITY AND CERAMICS ON THE SOUTHEASTERN ATLANTIC COAST: AN ETHNOHISTORICAL ANALYSIS JOHN E. WORTH For many decades, Southeastern archaeol- that range from more or less localized “phases” ogists have grappled with the issue of ceramic to extremely far-reaching “cultures” or “tradi- variability in both time and space. The struggle tions” (e.g., Willey and Phillips, 1958), none of includes not just describing and quantifying that which can yet be satisfactorily equated directly variability, but most importantly, explaining with human political or social entities as defined it as a reflection of broader patterns of cultural by anthropologists (or by the pottery makers change and diversity (or lack thereof) among themselves, for that matter). However, even in Native American groups across the southeastern the aftermath of a general disciplinary rejection United States during the last three millennia be- of this “culture history” paradigm that charac- fore European contact, and for several centuries terized most Southeastern archaeology through afterward. The archaeological focus continued the 1960s (e.g., Lyman et al., 1997), many fun- until mass-produced Euro-American ceramics damental tenets of this approach remain implicit largely replaced aboriginal wares during the 19th among practicing Southeastern archaeologists century. In large part owing to the fact that pot- today, including a widespread assumption of at tery was made, decorated, used, and discarded least rough equivalency between assemblages in such a diversity of cultural contexts and for of archaeologically defined ceramic types, and such a wide range of functions, combined with indigenous Native American ethnic groupings, the fact that pots were relatively easy to produce whether defined principally by sociopolitical af- and decorate at the household level, and com- filiation, language, or something else. monly had such a short use life, aboriginal ce- Despite what seems to be a commonly ramics commonly represent one of the most vo- presumed relationship between archaeological luminous and robust datasets for archaeologists ceramics and aboriginal ethnicity, archaeologists to employ in their studies of material culture as a have long been aware of difficulties in the very reflection of past cultural processes. In the past, definition and interpretation of ceramic styles and continuing to the present day, prehistoric ar- using archaeological types and assemblages, chaeologists in particular have utilized aborigi- and the extent to which these types are either nal ceramics in many ways, not least of which “discovered”—and hence reflect meaningful is in the construction and refinement of local categories for the potters themselves—or and regional cultural chronologies into ceramic “assigned”—and hence are principally an style periods, which are commonly used without heuristic device for analytical use by the particular regard to the cultural phenomena that archaeologist (Spaulding, 1953a, 1953b; Ford, doubtless underlie the observed chronological 1954a, 1954b). Even the meaning of ceramic and geographical variation. In addition to simple “style” itself is hotly debated, incorporating a chronology-building, prehistoric aboriginal ce- range of interpretations from style as a conscious ramics are also routinely used to define the geo- communication of social identity (Wobst, 1977) graphical distribution of ceramic style zones to style as a secondary reflection of social 180 ANTHROPOLOGICAL PAPERS AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY NO. 90 interaction patterns (Friedrich, 1970), along with much of their methodological and theoretical assorted combined approaches that reflect the foundations from prehistoric archaeology, it is hierarchical nature of style’s many facets, from also possible to apply this in reverse, and ex- the obvious and intentional to the implicit and trapolate specific inferences and generalizations unconscious. Moreover, particular difficulty gleaned from the historic era as an evidentiary has always been evident in the attempts to critique of prehistoric methodologies and theo- forge a meaningful relationship between the retical constructs. Indeed, over the past two de- chronological and geographic dimensions of cades, I have been increasingly intrigued with the observed variability in ceramic material culture. potential of data and analyses from the historic Why, for example, does one ceramic style zone period to contribute substantively and directly to expand spatially over the course of time, and the broader anthropological analysis of ceramic another contract or disappear? And why does variability as a facet of broader questions rela- the ceramic assemblage characterizing an entire tive to human cultural variability and change in style zone undergo transformation, either rapid colonial and noncolonial contexts alike. In my or gradual, in the first place? And how does opinion, the conscious and directed exploitation ceramic variability in space and time relate to of the multifaceted evidentiary record of the his- other dimensions of the cultures of the pottery toric era in the southeastern United States pro- makers themselves? vides many potential opportunities to refine and Strictly speaking, attempts to address these augment existing models relative to aboriginal questions for specific regions wholly within the ceramic variability and its explanation in anthro- prehistoric era are necessarily limited in scope, pological terms. given that the only direct source of additional and The broader struggle to relate aboriginal complementary evidence relative to the groups ceramic variability to human cultural diversity that inhabited that specific region, beyond the in a more general sense is well beyond the scope ceramic evidence itself, is still archaeological of the present paper, but in the pages that follow in nature. While ethnographic analogy and I will explore one specific case study relative ethnoarchaeology from comparative studies in to that loftier goal. Specifically, here I hope other regions around the world undoubtedly to address one of the more nagging research possess considerable relevance for interpreting questions that have plagued archaeologists such data, even if only indirectly, yet another along the southeastern Atlantic coast. It concerns alternative source of explicitly direct evidence the correspondence between ceramic material relative to the southeastern United States of course culture and a series of historically documented lies in the exploration of aboriginal ceramic ethnic groups during the early Spanish colonial variability within the early European colonial era. In particular, I will marshal detailed era, when ethnohistoric evidence is fortunately ethnohistorical evidence (much of which has available to supplement the archaeological only come to light in the past decade and a half) record, sometimes providing remarkable detail to examine associations between four more and depth regarding sociopolitical integration, or less discrete Native American groups—the ethnicity, language, migration, demography, Guale, the Orista/Escamaçu, the Mocama, and trade, warfare, and a myriad of other dimensions the Yamasee—and the observed archaeological of human variability with both spatial and evidence for ceramic variability during the temporal dimensions. Though archaeological turbulent centuries between first contact (ca. studies of this sort are by no means new (Smith, 1514) and the final abandonment (1763) of 1948; Sears, 1955; Fairbanks, 1958; Mason, the coastal region between Port Royal, South 1963; see also critique by Hally, 1971: 61–63), Carolina, and St. Augustine, Florida. The specific and include exemplary and detailed modern question that I hope to explore is whether or not research into aboriginal ceramics during the aboriginal ceramics in this region (defined at the historic period, some specifically relative to the typological level as assemblages of associated study area (Saunders, 2000a; Cordell, 2001; types) are fundamentally linked to these specific Foster, 2004), there still remains much room for ethnicities that are known to have persisted as productive study in this regard. distinct entities over time, or whether patterns While historic archaeologists studying of ceramic variability in both space and time are Southeastern Indians have commonly drawn instead related to other cultural or geographic 2009 ETHNICITY AND CERAMICS ON THE SOUTHEASTERN ATLANTIC COAST 181 factors that are largely independent of ethnicity. during his 1513 voyage, Spanish ships began to To foreshadow my conclusions for this chapter, reach farther and farther north and west from the careful examination of available archaeological Florida peninsula, and at some point between data from a variety of sites of known identity
Recommended publications
  • 2004 Midwest Archaeological Conference Program
    Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 47 2004 Program and Abstracts of the Fiftieth Midwest Archaeological Conference and the Sixty-First Southeastern Archaeological Conference October 20 – 23, 2004 St. Louis Marriott Pavilion Downtown St. Louis, Missouri Edited by Timothy E. Baumann, Lucretia S. Kelly, and John E. Kelly Hosted by Department of Anthropology, Washington University Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri-St. Louis Timothy E. Baumann, Program Chair John E. Kelly and Timothy E. Baumann, Co-Organizers ISSN-0584-410X Floor Plan of the Marriott Hotel First Floor Second Floor ii Preface WELCOME TO ST. LOUIS! This joint conference of the Midwest Archaeological Conference and the Southeastern Archaeological Conference marks the second time that these two prestigious organizations have joined together. The first was ten years ago in Lexington, Kentucky and from all accounts a tremendous success. Having the two groups meet in St. Louis is a first for both groups in the 50 years that the Midwest Conference has been in existence and the 61 years that the Southeastern Archaeological Conference has met since its inaugural meeting in 1938. St. Louis hosted the first Midwestern Conference on Archaeology sponsored by the National Research Council’s Committee on State Archaeological Survey 75 years ago. Parts of the conference were broadcast across the airwaves of KMOX radio, thus reaching a larger audience. Since then St. Louis has been host to two Society for American Archaeology conferences in 1976 and 1993 as well as the Society for Historical Archaeology’s conference in 2004. When we proposed this joint conference three years ago we felt it would serve to again bring people together throughout most of the mid-continent.
    [Show full text]
  • The Analysis of Contact-Era Settlements in Clay, Lowndes, and Oktibbeha Counties in Northeast Mississippi
    University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2017 The Analysis Of Contact-Era Settlements In Clay, Lowndes, And Oktibbeha Counties In Northeast Mississippi Emily Lee Clark University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Clark, Emily Lee, "The Analysis Of Contact-Era Settlements In Clay, Lowndes, And Oktibbeha Counties In Northeast Mississippi" (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 369. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/369 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ANALYSIS OF CONTACT-ERA SETTLEMENTS IN CLAY, LOWNDES, AND OKTIBBEHA COUNTIES IN NORTHEAST MISSISSIPPI A Thesis Presented for the Master of Arts Degree The University of Mississippi Emily Clark May 2017 Copyright © 2017 by Emily Clark All rights reserved ABSTRACT The goal of this project is to compare the spatial distribution of sites across Clay, Lowndes, and Oktibbeha counties between the Mississippi and Early Historic periods using site files from the Mississippi Department of Archives and History. Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS), sites were mapped chronologically to examine change through time to investigate how people reacted to European contact and colonization. Site locations and clusters also were used to evaluate possible locations of the polities of Chicaza, Chakchiuma, and Alimamu discussed in the De Soto chronicles. Sites in Clay, Lowndes, and Oktibbeha counties were chosen due to the existence of the large cluster of sites around Starkville, and because these counties have been proposed as the locations of Chicaza, Chakchiuma, and Alimamu (Atkinson 1987a; Hudson 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    Recalling Cahokia: Indigenous influences on English commercial expansion and imperial ascendancy in proprietary South Carolina, 1663-1721 Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Wall, William Kevin Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 10/10/2021 06:16:12 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/298767 RECALLING CAHOKIA: INDIGENOUS INFLUENCES ON ENGLISH COMMERCIAL EXPANSION AND IMPERIAL ASCENDANCY IN PROPRIETARY SOUTH CAROLINA, 1663-1721. by William kevin wall A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the AMERICAN INDIAN STUDIES PROGRAM In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2005 UMI Number: 3205471 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI UMI Microform 3205471 Copyright 2006 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Conquistadors at Saltville in 1567 Revisited
    Conquistadors at Saltville in 1567 Revisited Jim Glanville © 2014 Introduction This article continues and extends its author’s study of the interaction between the archeological and documentary evidence for the Spanish period of sixteenth century Virginia history. In 2004, the author published in the Smithfield Review an article titled “Conquistadors at Saltville in 1567? A Review of the Archeological and Documentary Evidence,” 1 which was footnoted in a review of sixteenth century Florida historiogra phy published in 2012 in connection with the 500-year anniversary of Juan Ponce de León’ s exploration of the Florida coast in 1513.2 Today, the story of the Spanish attack in Southwest Virginia is a part of mainstream Virginia history.3 The author subsequently published three follow up articles about the conquistadors. The first of these described a metal blade found in Smyth County, Virginia, that its finder speculated might have a Spanish connection (it did not).4 The second article was a brief progress report.5 The third article discussed the modern background to the story of the conquistadors and how that story developed.6 The present article reviews the routes of the Hernando de Soto7 (1539– 1542) and Juan Pardo (1566–1568) entradas into the American Southeast as revealed by the combination of archeological and documentary evidence. It also describes ongoing archeological studies at the conquistadors’ base camp at present-day Morganton, North Carolina; it cites two recently-found 145-year old newspaper reports (reproduced in the Appendix) of a buried Spanish soldier—who lies just a few miles outside the southern boundary of modern-day Virginia; and, via an examination of documentary evidence for the entradas, it compares with a modern map the region of Virginia shown in the third (1584) edition of the first-ever printed world atlas.
    [Show full text]
  • Unearthing Our Forgotten Past Press Release
    News Release: Immediate Contact: Anne Chesky Smith August 3, 2021 [email protected], 828/253-9231 ________________________________________________________________________________ WNC HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION HOSTS EXHIBIT OPENING FOR UNEARTHING OUR FORGOTTEN PAST ON AUGUST 18 “Unearthing Our Forgotten Past: Fort San Juan” is now on display in the Western North Carolina Historical Association galleries at the Smith-McDowell House in Asheville. The Association will celebrate the official opening of this excellent traveling exhibit on Wednesday, August 18 from 5:30pm to 7:30pm with live music, refreshments, and games on the front lawn. The event is free and open to the public. The Association is also celebrating several newly completed renovations on the historic home that serves as their facility including a new copper standing seam roof and new exterior paint. The exhibit was developed by the Exploring Joara Foundation as part of the celebration of the 450th anniversary of the Juan Pardo expeditions through Western North Carolina. Several decades ago, archaeologists identified a site near Morganton as the location of Joara, one of the largest Native American towns in what is today Western North Carolina. Joara was occupied from approximately 1400-1600 A.D. Two Spanish expeditions (led respectively by Hernando de Soto and Juan Pardo) visited the town in the 1500s. The Pardo expedition was part of a larger effort to establish a string of forts from the coast of present-day South Carolina to Mexico. In 2013, archaeologists confirmed that Joara was also the site of Fort San Juan, which was established by Pardo in 1567, nearly 20 years before the English settlement at Roanoke on the coast of North Carolina and 40 years before the settlement at Jamestown.
    [Show full text]
  • Touring Joara 2017
    Touring Joara 2017 Join NC Car Clubs & Exploring Joara Foundation on a European/Sports Car Tour and Poker Run Follow in the footsteps of Explorers and Patriots while enjoying some of North Carolina’s most scenic and challenging roads Join automotive enthusiasts from all over the Southeast in touring the North Carolina Foothills and Mountains on September 23, 2017. This event benefits the Exploring Joara Foundation (EJF), a non-profit organization that engages the public in archaeology in the Carolinas, and emphasizes the discovery of the Native American town of Joara and Fort San Juan, the first inland European settlement in the United States. This year’s event ties into the 450th anniversary of the founding of Fort San Juan (1567) and will allow drivers to explore the region’s rich Spanish and Native American cultural heritage. The Tour and Poker Run will begin at Catawba Meadows Park & Archeological Site, 701 Sanford Dr, Morganton, NC 28655 where you will pick up one card with your registration packet. There will be three stops on the tour where participants can check-in and pick up poker cards. The last card and Touring Joara poker prizes will be awarded at Hook & Anchor at 3:30 pm. Touring Joara 2017 is limited to 100 cars, pre- registration is preferred but we will accept registration the day of the event if space is available. You may pick up your tour packets between 7:30 am – 8:45 am, Exploring Joara Presentation 8:45 am, Driver’s Meeting 9:10 am, Tour vehicles roll out at 9:30 am.
    [Show full text]
  • Joara, Cuenca, and Fort San Juan
    I Joara, Cuenca, and Fort San Juan Deep in the country north and west of Santa Elena, near an Indian town named Joara, was a place where the trail crested a hill and gave the captain his first glimpse of the rugged lands that lay just ahead. Whatever paths wended up and over those steep slopes would no doubt have been precarious for any men so laden with supplies, even in the best of times, but it was late Decem- ber now, icy and cold, andproof Pardo shared his company’s disquiet as he regarded the rim of snow-filled mountains on the horizon. They had put a hundred leagues or more behind them already, most of it across fine, open country, but he knew—looking across at the high ridge—that any effort to push beyond its frozen passes with tired, overburdened men would be impractical at best, foolhardy at worst. He was neither. Even so, he would not be bogged down here with so little yet to show for himself. It was nearly dusk. He gave a nod to his sergeant, Moyano, that they should make camp now before night was upon them. In the morning they would arrive at the town the Indians called Joara, and while the company recovered he would take the counsel of his of- ficers before deciding where they should go from there. Standing on the crest of the hill, he was suddenly struck by how much this land in the shadow of the mountains reminded him of Cuenca, of home. He shut his eyes and let himself believe, but for a moment, that the setting sun on his face was that of Castile.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeastern Archaeological Conference
    SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 71ST ANNUAL MEETING NOVEMBER 12-15, 2014 GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA BULLETIN 57 SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE BULLETIN 57 PROCEEDINGS OF THE 71ST ANNUAL MEETING NOVEMBER 12-15, 2014 HYATT REGENCY GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA Edited by: Karen Y. Smith, Charlie Cobb, Brandy Joy, and Keith Stephenson Organized by: Charlie Cobb, Karen Y. Smith, and Nena Powell Rice Hosted by: South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology iii Cover: Postcard, early 20th c., Woodside Cotton Mills, Greenville, South Carolina. Printing of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 57—2014 funded by © Southeastern Archaeological Conference 2014 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Maps of Greenville .......................................................................................................... vi See also http://www.greenvillesc.gov/PublicWorks/forms/trolleymap.pdf Hyatt Regency Meeting Room Floor Plan .................................................................. vii Preface and Acknowledgements ................................................................................ viii List of Donors .................................................................................................................. xi SEAC at a Glance.............................................................................................................. 1 General Information and Special Events ...................................................................... 2 Program Thursday Morning, November
    [Show full text]
  • The King and His People in the Discourse of the Ancien Capitaine. Jerry A
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1995 The King and His People in the Discourse of the Ancien Capitaine. Jerry A. Micelle Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Micelle, Jerry A., "The King and His People in the Discourse of the Ancien Capitaine." (1995). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 6035. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/6035 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS Tins manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, andimproper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note wifi indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Indians of Virginia (Pre-1600 with Notes on Historic Tribes) Virginia History Series #1-09 © 2009
    Indians of Virginia (Pre-1600 With Notes on Historic Tribes) Virginia History Series #1-09 © 2009 1 Pre-Historic Times in 3 Periods (14,000 B.P.- 1,600 A.D.): Paleoindian Pre-Clovis (14,000 BP – 9,500 B.C.) Clovis (9,500 – 8,000 B.C.) Archaic Early (8,000 -6,000 B.C.) Middle (6,000 – 2,500 B.C.) Late (2,500 – 1,200 B.C.) Woodland Early (1,200 – 500 B.C.) Middle (500 B.C. – 900 A.D.) Late (900 – 1,600 A.D.) Mississippian Culture (Influence of) Tribes of Virginia 2 Alternate Hypotheses about Pre-historic Migration Routes taken by Paleo- Indians from Asia or Europe into North America: (1) From Asia by Water along the Northern Pacific or across the land bridge from Asia thru Alaska/Canada; or (2) From Europe on the edge of the ice pack along the North Atlantic Coast to the Temperate Lands below the Laurentide Ice Sheet. 3 Coming to America (The “Land Bridge” Hypothesis from Asia to North America thru Alaska) * * Before Present 4 Migrations into North and Central America from Asia via Alaska 5 The “Solutrean” Hypothesis of Pre-historic Migration into North America The Solutrean hypothesis claims similarities between the Solutrean point- making industry in France and the later Clovis culture / Clovis points of North America, and suggests that people with Solutrean tool technology may have crossed the Ice Age Atlantic by moving along the pack ice edge, using survival skills similar to that of modern Eskimo people. The migrants arrived in northeastern North America and served as the donor culture for what eventually developed into Clovis tool-making technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Saponi History Book
    Scott Preston Collins Chapter 1: The Ghost-men of the Woodlands Anciently the Siouan speaking groups originated in the Ohio River Valley. They began moving to the Piedmont of Virginia around 800 A.D, possibly following migrating buffalo herds in the directions they went. (1) Siouan groups migrated north and west into the Illinois, Indiana, Michigan and Wisconsin areas, some moved west to the Great Plains, some stayed in the Ohio River Valley, between the Licking River and the Ohio River, and along Scioto River and further west along the Kanawha River. Some settled into the Piedmont regions of the Quirank and Appalachian Mountains. (2) The Menominee are an Algonquin tribe that resided on the north shore of Lake Michigan at European contact. In the Menominee oral tradition there is a Winnebago arrival narrative. The Winnebago, or Ho Chunk (Hotcâgara, people of the parent speech), are a Siouan speaking tribe and are sometimes credited with the effigy mounds in the Wisconsin area as well originating in the pre-Columbian Ohio River Valley. The Winnebago came to the Menominee in the form of ravens or blackbirds across Lake Michigan to Red Banks on Green Bay. This story at least indicates a westward moving Siouan speaking population preserved in oral tradition. (3) James Mooney concluded that the Siouan speaking tribes originated in the Ohio Valley based on his study of the dispersal of the language along with informants among the Plains Dakotans. The Siouan speakers on the Great Plains maintained oral traditions which stated that they came from the east and near to the Great Lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • 16Th Century Spanish Invasions of Southwest Virginia
    Reprinted from the Historical Society o/Western Virginia Journal, XVII(l): 34-42,2009 [2010]. 16th Century Spanish Invasions of Southwest Virginia by Jim Glanville INTRODUCTION panish entradas (invasions) into Northeast Tennessee and Southwest Virginia (Holstonia) are documented to have occurred in 1541 and 1567. They predate the foundation of Jamestown by decades and are significant Sfor Virginia history - not just for regional history. The first entrada gave us the earliest two persons we can name who set foot within the boundary of the future state of Virginia. The second entrada produced the first ever recorded battle in Virginia, gave us the first named town in Virginia, the first woman(l) born in Virginia that we can name, and the earliest recorded marriage between a Christian soldier and an American Indian woman. This article summarizes the events of the past twenty-five years that have allowed us to tell the story of six­ teenth-century Spanish conquistadors in Southwest Virginia and the consequences of their arrival for the American Indians who inhabited the region. It describes and discusses the key publications about the story. The intent of the article is not to rehearse the actual story, but rather to tell how the story developed and cite the relevant references. Only during the past two or three years has the story achieved widespread recognition in popular magazines and newspapers.(2) in a Virginia history text book.(3) and in the online Library of Virginia state chronology.(4) Unthinking persons assert that history is fixed and unchanging. However, the discovery of new evidence reg­ ularly causes history to be rewritten.
    [Show full text]