DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Opinion in Belarus 1999 Larissa Titarenko 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Public Opinion in Belarus 1999 Larissa Titarenko 1 Public Opinion In Belarus 1999 A Publication in the VOICES OF THE ELECTORATE Series Larissa Titarenko, Ph.D. November 1999 Prepared for International Foundation for Election Systems 1101 15th Street, NW, Third Floor Washington, DC 20005 phone: (202) 828-8507 fax: (202) 452-0804 Public Opinion In Belarus 1999 Opinion Research at IFES is a global program seeking to develop reliable and accurate opinion indicators. Results from IFES-sponsored surveys and focus group discussions are published in the IFES Voices of the Electorate series. For more information on opinion research at IFES, please call the IFES Development and New Initiatives Office. Use of information from this publication is permitted, provided the following statement is attached in 10-point type: "Source: International Foundation for Election Systems." As a courtesy only, we request that you advise us when using any data from this report This Publication was made possible through support provided by the Office of Democracy and Governance, Bureau for Europe and the New Independent States, U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), under the terms of Cooperative Agreement No. EE-A-00- 97-00034-00. The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or IFES. International Foundation for Election Systems, Washington, DC 20005 Public Opinion in Belarus: 1999 Published November 1999 Printed in the United States of America ISBN 1-879720-62-0 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................ 1 SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 3 INTERPRETATION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE FUTURE ...................................................... 7 THE ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT IN BELARUS.................................................................... 12 Evaluation of the General Situation ............................................................................ 12 Evaluation of the Economic Future............................................................................. 14 Support for a Market Economy................................................................................... 17 Information about Economic Issues............................................................................ 18 Decision Making on Economic Issues ........................................................................ 19 GENERAL POLITICAL ATTITUDES.................................................................................... 21 Political Efficacy ......................................................................................................... 22 Political Isolation and the Russia-Belarus Union......................................................... 23 General Attitude toward the Government ................................................................... 26 Local Soviets.............................................................................................................. 27 FAITH IN SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS ...................................................................................... 29 Confidence................................................................................................................. 29 Corruption .................................................................................................................. 31 VOTING IN BELARUS ..................................................................................................... 34 General Attitude toward Voting................................................................................... 34 Who Voted in the 1996 Referendum? ........................................................................ 35 Future Voting for the 2001 Presidential Elections....................................................... 36 The Uncommitted Voters............................................................................................ 38 Important Issues for 2001 Presidential Elections........................................................ 38 PERCEPTIONS IN BELARUS OF THE APRIL 1999 ELECTIONS............................................. 40 Voting in the April 1999 Elections............................................................................... 40 Why People Did or Did Not Vote ................................................................................ 41 Most Important Issue.................................................................................................. 42 Rating the Election Process and Organization ........................................................... 42 Confidence in Members of Election Commissions is Divided...................................... 42 Overall Honesty of the April Elections ........................................................................ 43 Responsibility for the Fairness and Honesty of Elections ........................................... 44 Party Affiliation and Voting ......................................................................................... 45 Candidates Generally Reflect Views and Interests of Voters...................................... 46 Incumbent Deputies as Candidates............................................................................ 47 Information about the Voting Process......................................................................... 49 Main Source of Information ........................................................................................ 50 Influential Information Media ...................................................................................... 52 Other Issues in 1999 Elections................................................................................... 53 Military Personnel are Compelled to Vote................................................................... 53 The Impact of Military Voting...................................................................................... 54 i CIVIL SOCIETY IN BELARUS ........................................................................................... 56 What Does it Mean to Live in a Democratic Country?................................................. 57 Human Rights ............................................................................................................ 58 Attitudes toward the Political Opposition..................................................................... 61 Political Parties........................................................................................................... 62 Non-Governmental Organizations .............................................................................. 65 MASS MEDIA ................................................................................................................ 67 Media Familiarity........................................................................................................ 67 Main Media Sources .................................................................................................. 68 TV is the Main Source for Belarusians ....................................................................... 69 Radio ......................................................................................................................... 71 Newspapers Are Not Influential.................................................................................. 71 DIFFERENCES BETWEEN REGIONS.................................................................................. 73 ADDITIONAL NOTES ...................................................................................................... 76 APPENDIX I: TOPLINE DATA.......................................................................................... 79 APPENDIX II: MAP OF BELARUS ................................................................................. 115 ii Public Opinion in Belarus 1999 Larissa Titarenko 1 NTRODUCTION I This report analyzes the public opinion environment in Belarus in the spring of 1999, including the public’s general views on political and economic development, the performance of the government (national, regional, local), development of elements of civil society, and the perception of Belarus’ April 1999 local elections1. The Brief Summary provides an overview of the survey data. The Brief Interpretation section describes the data in terms of the transition processes in Belarus and possible implications for foreign assistance in promoting democracy in Belarus. The presentation of the main survey results is organized thematically and contains the following special sections: · Economic Environment · Political Attitudes · Social Institutions · Voting · Perception of April Elections · Civil Society · Media The Appendix includes the complete questionnaire and a table of the data. The 1999 survey is the first such survey conducted by the International Foundation for Election Systems in Belarus. From April 28 to May 7, 1999, 1,012 face-to-face interviews of adults (18 years and older) were conducted by a polling firm in Belarus. The technical aspects of this survey, including the sampling and preparation of the final data set, were supervised by Thomas Carson, Ph.D. The questionnaire was created in a joint effort by the IFES staff, including Michael Conway, IFES Senior Program Officer for Europe and NIS; Bob Richey, IFES Program Assistant for Europe and NIS; Thomas Carson, Ph.D.; Larissa Titarenko, Ph.D.; and the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The EU and Belarus – a Relationship with Reservations Dr
    BELARUS AND THE EU: FROM ISOLATION TOWARDS COOPERATION EDITED BY DR. HANS-GEORG WIECK AND STEPHAN MALERIUS VILNIUS 2011 UDK 327(476+4) Be-131 BELARUS AND THE EU: FROM ISOLATION TOWARDS COOPERATION Authors: Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck, Dr. Vitali Silitski, Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang, Dr. Martin Koopmann, Andrei Yahorau, Dr. Svetlana Matskevich, Valeri Fadeev, Dr. Andrei Kazakevich, Dr. Mikhail Pastukhou, Leonid Kalitenya, Alexander Chubrik Editors: Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck, Stephan Malerius This is a joint publication of the Centre for European Studies and the Konrad- Adenauer-Stiftung. This publication has received funding from the European Parliament. Sole responsibility for facts or opinions expressed in this publication rests with the authors. The Centre for European Studies, the Konrad-Adenauer- Stiftung and the European Parliament assume no responsibility either for the information contained in the publication or its subsequent use. ISBN 978-609-95320-1-1 © 2011, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V., Sankt Augustin / Berlin © Front cover photo: Jan Brykczynski CONTENTS 5 | Consultancy PROJECT: BELARUS AND THE EU Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck 13 | BELARUS IN AN INTERnational CONTEXT Dr. Vitali Silitski 22 | THE EU and BELARUS – A Relationship WITH RESERvations Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang, Dr. Martin Koopmann 34 | CIVIL SOCIETY: AN analysis OF THE situation AND diRECTIONS FOR REFORM Andrei Yahorau 53 | Education IN BELARUS: REFORM AND COOPERation WITH THE EU Dr. Svetlana Matskevich 70 | State bodies, CONSTITUTIONAL REALITY AND FORMS OF RULE Valeri Fadeev 79 | JudiciaRY AND law
    [Show full text]
  • Culture and Change in Belarus
    East European Reflection Group (EE RG) Identifying Cultural Actors of Change in Belarus, Ukraine and Moldova Culture and Change in Belarus Report prepared by Yael Ohana, Rapporteur Generale Bratislava, August 2007 Culture and Change in Belarus “Life begins for the counter-culture in Belarus after regime change”. Anonymous, at the consultation meeting in Kiev, Ukraine, June 14 2007. Introduction1 Belarus, Moldova and Ukraine have recently become direct neighbours of the European Union. Both Moldova and Ukraine have also become closer partners of the European Union through the European Neighbourhood Policy. Neighbourhood usually refers to people next-door, people we know, or could easily get to know. It implies interest, curiosity and solidarity in the other living close by. For the moment, the European Union’s “neighbourhood” is something of an abstract notion, lacking in substance. In order to avoid ending up “lost in translation”, it is necessary to question and some of the basic premises on which cultural and other forms of European cooperation are posited. In an effort to create constructive dialogue with this little known neighbourhood, the European Cultural Foundation (ECF) and the German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF) are currently preparing a three- year partnership to support cultural agents of change in Belarus, Moldova and Ukraine. In the broad sense, this programme is to work with, and provide assistance to, initiatives and institutions that employ creative, artistic and cultural means to contribute to the process of constructive change in each of the three countries. ECF and GMF have begun a process of reflection in order to understand the extent to which the culture sphere in each of the three countries under consideration can support change, defined here as processes and dynamics contributing to democratisation, Europeanisation and modernisation in the three countries concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Want to Read More?
    The Belarusian CRISIS And the Influence of Russia By Pavlo Troian, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine PHOTOS BY THE ASSOCIATED PRESS he large-scale protests after the August 2020 presidential election in Belarus are proof that many Belarusians are T not ready to accept the victory of incumbent President Alexander Lukashenko that was announced by the Central Election Commission. According to the official results, he won more than 80% of the votes. The situation was further aggra- vated by the unprecedented level of police violence against protesters who took to the streets to express their disagreement with the official election results. The Belarusian authorities relied on Russian support and accused the West of organizing protests with the aim of overthrowing the government. However, Lukashenko made similar accusations against Russia before the election protests. Why did the situation turn upside down? Let us consider the reasons. Lukashenko has ruled the country for 26 years and is the longest-reigning leader of a European country (not counting monarchs). He was first elected in 1994, and reelected in 2001, 2006, 2010 and 2015. In 2004, he initiated a referendum that removed from the constitution a limit to the maximum number of terms the same person can hold the presidency. During his tenure, Lukashenko has repeatedly been accused of restricting civil rights and freedoms and usurping power. There were accusa- tions of organizing political assassinations — several opponents of A woman in a former Belarusian national flag reacts as opposition supporters gather during a rally to protest the official presidential election results. per Concordiam 55 Lukashenko disappeared without a trace in the late 1990s and army, parliament, council of ministers and other suprana- early 2000s.
    [Show full text]
  • Belarus: Country Background Report
    Order Code 95-776 F Updated September 28, 2001 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Belarus: Country Background Report -name redacted- Specialist in European Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Summary This short report provides information on Belarus’s history, political and economic situation, human rights record, foreign policy, and U.S. relations with Belarus. It will be updated when necessary. History Belarus at a Glance Belarusians are descendants of Slavic tribes that migrated into the Land Area: 80,154 sq. mi., slightly smaller region in the ninth century. The than Kansas. beginnings of their development as a distinct people can be traced from the 13th century, when the Mongols Population: 10 million (2000 estimate) conquered Russia and parts of Ukraine, while Belarusians became Ethnic Composition: 77.9% Belarusian, part of (and played a key role in) the 13.2% Russian, 4.1% Polish and 2.9% Grand Duchy of Lithuania. In 1569, Ukrainian. the Grand Duchy merged with Poland, ushering in over two Gross Domestic Product (GDP): $12.67 centuries of Polish rule. Poland itself billion in 1999 (EIU estimate at market was divided in the late 18th century, exchange rate). and Belarusian territories fell to Russia. Political Leaders: President: Aleksandr Lukashenko; Prime Minister: Vladimir Ruling powers (i.e. Poles and Yermoshin; Foreign Minister: Mikhail Kvotsov; Russians) tried to culturally Defense Minister: Leonid Maltsev assimilate Belarusians and pushed Sources: World Bank, International Monetary them to the lowest rungs of the Fund, Economist Intelligence Unit. socio-economic ladder. As a result, Belarus did not develop a substantial national movement until the late 19th century.
    [Show full text]
  • P6 TA(2004)0045 Result of the Referendum and Elections in Belarus
    P6_TA(2004)0045 Result of the referendum and elections in Belarus European Parliament resolution on the political situation in Belarus after the parliamentary elections and referendum of 17 October 2004 The European Parliament, – having regard to its previous resolutions on the situation in Belarus, in particular its resolution of 16 September 20041, – having regard to the opinion on the referendum of 17 October 2004 in Belarus adopted by the 60th Plenary Session of the Venice Commission on 8-9 October 2004, – having regard, in particular, to its resolution of 24 October 1996 on the situation in Belarus2, in which it decided that no further steps would be taken towards ratification of the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement with that country until clear signals had been given by the Belarussian authorities of their intention fully to respect basic democratic and human rights, – having regard, in particular, to its resolution of 5 July 2001 on Belarus3, adopted prior to the 2001 presidential elections, and to the reports of the Parliamentary Troika (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Parliamentary Assembly, Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly and European Parliament) published after the 2000 general election (30 January 2001) and the 2001 presidential election (4 October 2001), – having regard, in particular, to its resolution of 11 February 2003 on relations between the European Union and Belarus: towards a future partnership4, – having regard to the parliamentary elections and the constitutional referendum
    [Show full text]
  • European Union Foreign Affairs Journal
    European Union Foreign Affairs Journal eQuarterly for European Foreign, Foreign Trade, Development, Security Policy, EU-Third Country Relations and Regional Integration (EUFAJ) N° 01 – 2009 (November 2009) ISSN 2190-6122 Contents Editorial Finally a Periodical about EU Foreign Policy 4 Articles Europe Should Say “Yes Minister” to Her – On the New EU Foreign Minister 5 The Future Diplomatic Service of the European Union – Hans-Jürgen Zahorka 6 The European Union and Belarus: Five Theses for a Pragmatic Approach – Peter Liesegang 20 Soon to Come: New Nordic Information Office in Minsk 23 Belarus: 2009 Situation Analysis and Policy Recommendations 24 What Can the Belarusian Government do? - From the Website of the EU Delegation 27 The Energy Security of Europe and the Role of Azerbaijan – Fazil Zeynalov 29 Turkmenistan: Still Waiting for the Second Step – Farid Tukhbatullin 35 Russia is Indeed a European Country – Olivier Védrine 37 Competition in Albania – Evis Pertafi 41 Europeanization of Macedonian Regional Policy – Sanja Kostovska 59 Ambitious New Free Trade Agreement EU-Korea 71 Documentation The New Foreign Policy Related Articles of the Treaty of Lisbon 74 The European Parliament and Its New Parliamentary Delegations 91 Reviews 95 Standpoint. By Olivier Védrine - Power to Europe’s People 103 European Union Foreign Affairs Journal – N° 1–2009 (November 2009) www.eufaj.eu, e-mail: [email protected] 1 Nehemia University is a new, private university in Pogradec/Albania, ashore Macedonian-Albanian Lake Ohrid. Since the early 1990s, Bavarian aid organisations bogged down in Albania, where they set up a group of kindergartens, elementary schools (also for underprivileged children), secondary schools, medical and rural development projects – and now also a university.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Belarus
    Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights REPUBLIC OF BELARUS EARLY PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 17 November 2019 ODIHR NEEDS ASSESSMENT MISSION REPORT 26 – 30 August 2019 Warsaw 6 September 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................ 1 III. FINDINGS ........................................................................................................... 3 A. BACKGROUND ...............................................................................................................3 B. ELECTORAL SYSTEM AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK ...........................................................4 C. ELECTION ADMINISTRATION .........................................................................................5 D. VOTER REGISTRATION ..................................................................................................7 E. CANDIDATE REGISTRATION ..........................................................................................7 F. ELECTION CAMPAIGN ....................................................................................................8 G. CAMPAIGN FINANCE ......................................................................................................9 H. MEDIA ..........................................................................................................................10 I. COMPLAINTS AND APPEALS ........................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Belarus by Alexei Pikulik, Dzianis Melyantsou Et Al
    Belarus by Alexei Pikulik, Dzianis Melyantsou et al. Capital: Minsk Population: 9.5 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$14,460 Source: The data above are drawn from the World Bank’sWorld Development Indicators 2013. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Electoral Process 6.75 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 6.75 6.75 7.00 7.00 7.00 Civil Society 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.50 6.50 6.25 6.00 6.00 6.25 6.50 Independent Media 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.50 6.75 6.75 6.75 Governance* 6.50 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a National Democratic Governance n/a 6.75 7.00 7.00 7.00 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 Local Democratic Governance n/a 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 Judicial Framework and Independence 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 7.00 7.00 Corruption 5.75 6.00 6.25 6.25 6.25 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.25 6.25 Democracy Score 6.54 6.64 6.71 6.68 6.71 6.57 6.50 6.57 6.68 6.71 * Starting with the 2005 edition, Freedom House introduced separate analysis and ratings for national democratic governance and local democratic governance to provide readers with more detailed and nuanced analysis of these two important subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • UKRAINIAN and BELARUS PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS: PRELUDE to a CRISIS in the WESTERN BORDERLANDS of RUSSIA an Immediate Aftermath of Elections
    WARNING! The views expressed in FMSO publications and reports are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. UKRAINIAN AND BELARUS PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS: PRELUDE TO A CRISIS IN THE WESTERN BORDERLANDS OF RUSSIA An Immediate Aftermath of Elections Dr. Jacob W. Kipp Foreign Military Studies Office, Fort Leavenworth, KS. August 1994 In his address to the Polish Sejm last week in Warsaw President Clinton pledged to support the fledgling democracies of Central and Eastern Europe through a three-prong policy of "supporting democracy, advancing free markets and meeting new security challenges." Clinton described the looming security challenge in Europe as a struggle against "would-be dictators and fiery nationalists . promoting ethnic and racial hatred, promoting religious divisions and anti- semitism and aggressive nationalism." From these sources arise those challenges that threatens the sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity of the states of Central and Eastern Europe as they go about the business of building democracies and free-market economies. Clinton declared: "No democracy in this region should ever be consigned to a gray area or a buffer zone, and no country should have the right to veto, compromise or threaten democratic Poland's or any other democracy's integration into Western institutions, including those that ensure our security." 1 This position assumes that consignment of a state or states to a gray area is a function of the actions of another power. But the question of internal stability, i. e., the degree of popular support that the state or states enjoy from their populations and their commitment to the maintenance of their nation's independence, can be a function of internal factors tied to a complex set of circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • Opinion on the Referendum of 17 October 2004 in Belarus
    Strasbourg, 8 October 2004 CDL-AD(2004)029 Or. Engl. Opinion no. 314/2004 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OPINION ON THE REFERENDUM OF 17 OCTOBER 2004 IN BELARUS Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 60th Plenary Session (Venice, 8-9 October 2004) on the basis of comments by Mr Sergio BARTOLE (Substitute member, Italy) Mr Matthew RUSSELL (Expert, Ireland) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera pas distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. CDL-AD(2004)029 - 2 - Introduction 1. By letter dated 4 October 2004 the President of the Parliamentary Assembly asked the Venice Commission to give an opinion on the compatibility of the planned referendum in Belarus with Council of Europe standards He asked for the opinion to be given as a matter of urgency at the next plenary session of the Commission on 8 to 9 October 2004. 2. The referendum in Belarus was called by the President of Belarus, Alexander Lukashenko, by decree issued on 7 September 2004. It will take place on 17 October 2004. The single question submitted to the voters reads as follows: “Do you allow the first President of the Republic of Belarus Alexander Grigoryevich Lukashenko to participate in the presidential election as a candidate for the post of the President of the Republic of Belarus and do you accept Part 1 of Article 81 of the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus in the wording that follows: “The President shall be elected directly by the people of the Republic of Belarus for a term of five years by universal, free, equal, direct and secret ballot?” 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rebuilding of Greater Russia: Putin's Foreign Policy Towards The
    The Rebuilding of Greater Russia This book describes the strategies used by President Putin from 2000 onwards to recreate ‘Greater Russia’, that is, a Russia that controls most of the territory of the former Soviet Union. It shows the subtlety of the means of control, often through creating economic dependencies in the ‘near abroad’, including exploit- ing energy dependency, through prolonging other political and military depen- dencies, and sometimes through traditional ‘power politics’. It argues that after seven years in power the results of this strategy are beginning to show. It pro- vides comprehensive coverage of Russia’s relations to the former Soviet territo- ries of the CIS countries, including Ukraine and Putin’s role in the events surrounding the ‘Orange Revolution’, Belarus and the attempts to form a union, the Caucasus and Russia’s role in the various conflicts, Moldova, including the Transdniester conflict, and Central Asia. This is an important subject, for inter- national relations scholars generally, not just Russian studies experts. Bertil Nygren is Associate Professor of Political Science at the Swedish National Defence College and the Department of Political Science, Stockholm University. His research interests focus on politics in Russia and the CIS coun- tries, security, strategy and international relations. His publications include Russia as a Great Power, Dimensions of Security Under Putin (edited by Jakob Hedenskog, Vilhelm Konnander, Bertil Nygren, Ingmar Oldberg and Christer Pursiainen), Routledge, 2005. Routledge contemporary Russia and Eastern Europe series 1 Liberal Nationalism in Central 6 Building Democracy and Civil Europe Society East of the Elbe Stefan Auer Essays in honour of Edmund Mokrzycki 2 Civil–Military Relations in Edited by Sven Eliaeson Russia and Eastern Europe David J.
    [Show full text]
  • Issopinion November 2008 Virtual Or Real Change? the Parliamentary Elections in Belarus
    Astrid Sahm* ISSOpinion November 2008 VIrtUAl Or rEAl chANgE? thE pArlIAmENtAry ElEctIONS IN BElArUS Many Europeans had been cautiously optimis- tic that September’s parliamentary elections in Belarus would help break the deadlock in EU- Belarusian relations. However, not a single op- position candidate was elected, and interna- tional observers declared that the elections fell short of international standards. Is Minsk seri- ous about rapprochement with the West? And how Copyright: Sergei Grits/AP/SIPA can the European Union best encourage progress with its eastern neighbour? So far the European Union has not been very suc- cessful in its attempts to apply a strict positive conditionality approach towards Belarus. Since the parliamentary elections in 2000 − the first national elections after the controversial constitutional ref- erendum of 1996 − Belarusian elections have been treated by the EU as a litmus test for the improve- ment of relations. The procedure was the same each time: the EU demand for free and fair elections as a precondition for ending the international isola- tion of Belarus was totally ignored by the Belarusian authorities. Consequently, the European Union was forced to introduce new sanctions against Belarus, like the enlarged visa ban for leading officials af- ter the parliamentary elections in 2004. Belarus was not included in the European Neighbourhood Policy A Belarusian woman casts her ballot paper at a polling station during parliamentary elections in minsk, and therefore, among other things, in 2007 the visa Belarus, 28 September 2008 costs for Belarusian citizens increased to €60, while Ukrainian and Russian citizens continued to get the question has therefore been, would the 30 Septem- cheaper visa of €35.
    [Show full text]