Surface-Water Characteristics and Quality on the Osage Reservation, Osage County, Oklahoma, 1999

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Surface-Water Characteristics and Quality on the Osage Reservation, Osage County, Oklahoma, 1999 Prepared in cooperation with the Osage Tribal Council, U.S. Department of Energy, and Bureau of Indian Affairs Surface-Water Characteristics and Quality on the Osage Reservation, Osage County, Oklahoma, 1999 Water-Resources Investigations Report 02–4060 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Abbott, M.M. and Tortorelli, R.L.—Surface-Water Characteristics and Quality on the Osage Reservation, Osage County, Oklahoma, 19999—USGS/WRIR 02–4060 Printed on recycled paper Surface-Water Characteristics and Quality on the Osage Reservation, Osage County, Oklahoma, 1999 By Marvin M. Abbott and Robert L. Tortorelli Prepared in cooperation with the Osage Tribal Council, U.S. Department of Energy, and Bureau of Indian Affairs Water-Resources Investigations Report 02–4060 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2002 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 District Chief U.S. Geological Survey 202 NW 66 St., Bldg. 7 Oklahoma City, OK 73116 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Information about water resources in Oklahoma is available on the World Wide Web at http://ok.water.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, it contains copyrighted materials that are noted in the text. Permission to reproduce those items must be secured from the individual copyright owners. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: OKLAHOMA CITY 2002 iii Contents Abstract . 1 Introduction . 1 Purpose and scope . 3 Description of the study area . 3 Acknowledgments . 3 Streamflow characteristics . 3 Drainage basins . 7 Water quality . 13 Historical water-quality data . 13 Summary statistics of surface-water quality . 13 Comparison of surface-water-quality and ground-water-quality data . .18 Comparison of surface-water quality and oil well data . 18 Summary . 21 Selected references . 22 Supplemental information . 24 Delineation of basin boundaries . 25 Oil-industry well data . 25 Water-quality sampling procedures . 25 Water-quality analyses . 25 Quality-control sampling . 28 Illustrations Figures 1-2. Maps showing: 1. Oil and gas well locations on the Osage Reservation, Oklahoma. .2 2. Surface drainage basins, surface-water-quality sites, type of samples collected, and streamflow gages on the Osage Reservation, Oklahoma. 4 3. Graph showing monthly streamflows, as a percent of mean annual discharge, based on water year (October 1–September 30) for selected continuous record streamflow-gaging stations in and near the Osage Reservation, Oklahoma. .5 Figures 4-5. Maps showing: 4. Surface drainages and incremental basins from digital-elevation model of the Osage Reservation, Oklahoma. 26 5. Digital-elevation model of the Osage Reservation, Oklahoma. 27 Figures 6-8. Graphs showing: 6. a) Incremental basin areas grouped by major drainage basins in the Osage Reservation, Oklahoma; b) the number of oil wells in incremental basins grouped by major drainage basins; and c) the number of oil wells per square mile in incremental basins grouped by major drainage basins. 12 7. Dissolved chloride concentrations at two surface-water sites, historical and current water- quality data on the Osage Reservation, Oklahoma. 14 8. Stream discharge measurements at the time of sampling, grouped by major drainage basins; b) dissolved chloride concentration, grouped by major drainage basins; c) chloride load, iv grouped by major drainage basins; and d) chloride yield, grouped by major drainage basins. 17 Figure 9. Map showing surface-water sample sites where estimated chloride yield is greater than 0.07 ton per day per square mile on the Osage Reservation, Oklahoma. 19 Figure 10. Graphs showing a) Dissolved chloride concentrations; b) dissolved solids concentration; c) dissolved sulfate concentration; and d) dissolved nitrite plus nitrate as nitrogen concentration in associated surface- and ground-water samples in the Osage Reservation, Oklahoma. 20 Tables 1. Mean annual flow and annual low flow frequency estimates for selected continuous record streamflow-gaging stations with at least 10 years of streamflow data from unregulated and regulated basins on and near the Osage Reservation, Oklahoma . 6 2. Documented extreme peak discharges and flood frequency estimates for selected streamflow- gaging stations with at least eight years of annual peak-discharge data from unregulated and regulated basins on and near the Osage Reservation, Oklahoma . .8 3. Lake data for major reservoirs in the Osage Reservation, Oklahoma . 9 4. Summary statistics for the incremental basin areas on the Osage Reservation, Oklahoma . 10 5. Summary statistics for the number of oil wells per incremental basin on the Osage Reservation, Oklahoma, 1900-1998 . 10 6. Summary statistics for the number of oil wells per square mile per incremental basin on the Osage Reservation, Oklahoma . 11 7. Summary statistics of stream discharge measurements on the Osage Reservation, Oklahoma, 1999 15 8. Summary statistics of dissolved chloride concentrations in the Osage Reservation, Oklahoma, 1999 15 9. Summary statistics of chloride load in the Osage Reservation, Oklahoma, 1999 . 16 10. Summary statistics of chloride yield on the Osage Reservation, Oklahoma, 1999 . 16 11. Analytical methods used at the U.S. Geological Survey, Quality of Water Service Unit Laboratory, Ocala, Florida, and the National Water Quality Laboratory, Denver, Colorado . 30 12. Surface-water quality sites, basin areas, and associated oil wells on the Osage Reservation, Oklahoma . 31 13. Specific conductance and chloride analyses of surface-water samples on the Osage Reservation, Oklahoma, 1999 . 38 14. Chemical analyses of 20 surface-water samples for water properties, major cations and anions, trace elements, and nutrients on the Osage Reservation, Oklahoma,1999 . 44 15a. Chemical analyses of quality-control samples for chloride from surface water on the Osage Reservation, Oklahoma, 1999 . 49 15b. Chemical analyses of quality-control samples for water properties, major cations and anions, trace elements, and nutrients from surface water on the Osage Reservation, Oklahoma, 1999 . 50 16. Comparison of surface-water and nearby ground-water samples on the Osage Reservation, Oklahoma . ..
Recommended publications
  • Little Rock, Arkansas
    LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS The civil works portion of this District covers an area of the District is responsible for the portion of the Little approximately 36,414 square miles in northern, western, River and its tributaries that are in the state of Arkansas, and southwestern Arkansas and a portion of Missouri. above its mouth near Fulton, AR. In the White River This area is within the Arkansas River, Little River, and Basin, the District is responsible for those portions in White River basins. In the Arkansas River Basin, the southern Missouri and northern and eastern Arkansas in District is responsible for planning, design, construction, the White River drainage basin and its tributaries above operation, and maintenance of the navigation portion of Peach Orchard Bluff, AR. The Memphis District is re- the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System sponsible for navigation maintenance on the White River (MKARNS). The District is also responsible for the below Newport, AR, to the mouth of Wild Goose areas included in the Arkansas River drainage basin Bayou, in Arkansas County, AR. The White River from above Pine Bluff, AR, to below the mouth of the downstream from the mouth of Wild Goose Bayou is Poteau River, near Fort Smith, AR. In Little River Basin, part of the MKARNS. IMPROVEMENTS NAVIGATION Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 1. Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, And KS ........... 3 2. Arthur V. Ormond Lock & Dam (No.9), AR ..... 3 28. Beaver Lake, AR ………………………………9 3. David D. Terry Lock And Dam (No. 6), AR ...... 4 29. Bull Shoals Lake, AR.................................. ….10 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Status Survey of the Western Fanshell and the Neosho Mucket in Oklahoma
    1990 c.3 OKLAHOMA <) PROJECT TITLE: STATUS SURVEY OF THE WESTERN FANSHELL AND THE NEOSHO MUCKET IN OKLAHOMA To determine the distribution and abundance of the freshwater mussels Cyprogenia aberti (Conrad) and Lampsilis rafinesqueana Frierson in Oklahoma. A survey to determine the status of the freshwater mussels, Cyprogenia aberti (Conrad) and Lampsilis rafinesqueana Frierson, in Oklahoma was completed during August and September, 1989. These species are also known by the common names of Western Fanshell and Neosho Mucket, respectively. The western fanshell is probably extinct in the state. It is known that the species formerly occurred in the Verdigris River in Oklahoma and as a result of this study, was determined that it had also existed in the Caney River. However, no evidence of living or fresh specimens was found in any river system in northeastern Oklahoma. The Neosho mucket has also disappeared from most of its former range within the state and presently only occurs in a segment of the Illinois River system extending from the Lake Frances dam near the Arkansas border to Lake Tenkiller. Protection for this species is recommended. This report describes efforts to determine the status of two species of freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionidae) in Oklahoma. Both species are generally considered to be rare and have rather limited geographical distributions. Both species may meet the criteria of endangered species and thus it was considered important to gain some information as to their current status. Both species have been recorded in Oklahoma but their current abundance and distribution in the state were unknown. The western fanshell, Cyprogenia aberti (Conrad) was described in 1850 from specimens collected on the rapids of the Verdigris River, Chambers' Ford, Oklahoma (Johnson, 1980).
    [Show full text]
  • Destructive Floods in the United States in 1904
    Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 147 Series M, General Hydrographic Iimstigations, 15 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIEKCTOB DESTRUCTIVE FLOODS IN THE UNITED STATES IN 1904 EDWARD CHARLES MURPHY AND OTHERS WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1905 Water-Sutrply and Irrigation Paper No. 147 Series M, General Hydrographic Investigations, 15 DEPAKTMENT OF THE INTEEIOE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALOOTT, DIRECTOR DESTRUCTIVE FLOODS IN THE UNITED STATES IN 1904 EDWARD CHARLES MURPHY AND OTHERS WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1905 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transmittal.___--------_---___--___--_------_---..----_------.-- 9 Introduction. ______.___.______._._____________.____.____-_.___.-----.---- 11 Sacramento River flood, California, from report of S. G. Bennett. _.___.___ 12 Streams and drainage basin ______________._____.__._-_.-.--.___-____- 12 Precipitation ---..--..-----_.__-________.-._----.-----_----.--------- 15 Gage height and discharge -___..____._. _______ ___.___.__-_-----__--- 16 Obstruction of channeL _---______.____.__.___.___..-____------------ 20 Damage ............................................................. 20 Prevention of future damage-..._______._.- ___--_.---_.----------__-- 21 Susquehanna River flood. Pennsylvania, by E. C. Murphy................ 22 Former floods....-------__-_-.._____ .........-...--- ...-.--.--.--.- 32 Streams and drainage basin..........._------.-.-----..--.-.--.--.--. 23 Precipitation _......-..-......--........--..-..--.-.------.._---.----
    [Show full text]
  • City of Bartlesville, OK
    Technical Proposal: Caney River Water Augmentation and Intake Improvements to Provide Drought Resiliency City of Bartlesville, OK Application for the WaterSMART Drought Response Program: Drought Resiliency Project for Fiscal Year 2017 Bureau of Reclamation FOA No. BOR-DO-17-F010 Project Manager Terry Lauritsen, P.E., CFM Director of Water Utilities City of Bartlesville 401 S. Johnstone Avenue Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74003 Office: 918-338-4107 / Fax: 918-338-4109 [email protected] Table of Contents Abbreviations................................................................................................................................... 3 Technical Proposal and Evaluation Criteria ....................................................................................4 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................4 Background Data ................................................................................................................. 5 Project Description ............................................................................................................ 11 Performance Measures ......................................................................................................16 Evaluation Criteria............................................................................................................. 16 Evaluation Criterion A – Project Benefits .............................................................16 Evaluation
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Contains More Information on the Existing Conditions of the City
    City of Bartlesville, Oklahoma 2016 Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Flanagan & Associates, LLC Planning Consultants Flanagan & Associates, LLC 233 Washington County Multi-Jurisdictional MHMP Update Acknowledgements The City of Bartlesville Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Update was made possible by a Hazard Mitigation Grant through Oklahoma Emergency Management from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and local funding from Washington County and the City of Bartlesville. The Plan was prepared under the direction of the Washington County Commissioner’s Office, the Bartlesville City Council, with the participation and assistance of numerous agencies, organizations, and individuals, including: City of Bartlesville Administration Mayor......................................................Tom Gorman City Manager ..........................................Ed Gordon Executive Assistant.................................Elaine Banes Grants Administrator ..............................Nancy Warring City Attorney ..........................................Jerry Maddux Administrative Director/CFO .................Mike Bailey Engineering &Water Utilities Director...Terry Lauritsen Bartlesville City Council Councilor Ward 1....................................Ted Lockin Councilor Ward 2....................................John Kane Councilor Ward 3....................................Tod Gorman Councilor Ward 4....................................Doann Nguyen Councilor Ward 5....................................Dale Copeland Hazard Mitigation Advisory
    [Show full text]
  • FHWA-OK-89-04 Report No. 88-2 Analysis of October
    ANALYSIS OF OCTOBER 1986 FLOOD IN CANEY RIVER AT U.S. 75 BARTLESVILLE, OKLAHOMA Volume I Submitted to Oklahoma Department of Transportation Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105 and Federal Highway Administration Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73 l 02 by A. K. Tyagi, Ph.D., P .E. Principal Investigator Report No. 88-2 Water Resources Engineering School of Civil Engineering Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078 September 1988 TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. RIPORT NO. 12. QOVl!RNMINT ACCllllON NO. a. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NO. FHWA/OK gg(o4) Vol. I 4. TITL! ANO IU8TITL! 5. REPORT DATE Analysis of October 1986 Flood in Caney River Si:>n ti:>mhP r. 1q88 at U.So 75, Bart1esvi11e, Oklahoma 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR(I) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT A. K. Tyag i 88-2 10. WORK UNIT NO. ---------------------------...a9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION AND ADDRESS School of c iv i 1 Engineering 11. CONTRACT OR GR.ANT NO. Oklahoma State University Item 21;0 Sti 1 lwater, OK 74078 . 1a. TYPEOFFU!PORTANDPER1oocoveAEO ..--------------------------------12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND .ADDRESS Interj m Report: May 1987 - Oklahoma Department of Transportation September 1988 Research and Development Divis ion 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE 200 NE 21st Street Oklahoma Citv. OK 73105 Item Zl50 15. SUPPLEMENT.ARV NOTES Conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Hiqhwav Administration 16. ABSTRACT Hurricane Paine, extending across the Central Plains of the United States, caused flooding of unprecedented proportions in the Caney River. This storm produced a rainfall varying from 20 to 30 inches in Oklahoma during September 29 through October 4, 1986.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Peak Streamflow and Stages at Selected Streamgages in Eastern and Northeastern Oklahoma from the May to June
    Prepared in cooperation with the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Characterization of Peak Streamflow and Stages at Selected Streamgages in Eastern and Northeastern Oklahoma from the May to June 2019 Flood Event—With an Emphasis on Flood Peaks Downstream from Dams and on Tributaries to the Arkansas River Open-File Report 2020–1090 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Photograph showing USGS employees on State Highway 104 near the Arkansas River near Haskell, Oklahoma, streamgage (07165570). Photograph by Kevin Smith, U.S. Geological Survey. Characterization of Peak Streamflow and Stages at Selected Streamgages in Eastern and Northeastern Oklahoma from the May to June 2019 Flood Event—With an Emphasis on Flood Peaks Downstream from Dams and on Tributaries to the Arkansas River By Jason M. Lewis, David J. Williams, Sarah J. Harris, and Adam R. Trevisan Prepared in cooperation with the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Open-File Report 2020–1090 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2020 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • FISHES of the VERDIGRIS RIVER in OKLAHOMA by GEORGE HAMS
    FISHES OF THE VERDIGRIS RIVER IN OKLAHOMA By GEORGE HAMS WALLEY Bachelor of Science Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 1956 Submitted to the faculty of the Graduate School of the Oklahoma State University of Agriculture and Applied Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May, 1958 Name: George Hames Wallen Date of Degree: May 25, 1958 Institution: Oklahoma State University Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma Title of Study: FISHES OF THE VERDIGRIS RIVER IN OKLAHOMA Pages in Study: 57 Candidate for the Degree of Master of Science Major Field: Zoology Scope of Study: The Verdigris River Drainage was surveyed during the summer of 1956 to determine the number of species of fishes pre- sent and the relative abundance of each species. Eighty-eight locations were sampled by using seines, rotenone and gill nets. Findings and Conclusions: An annotated list was prepared including ecological data, of fishes collected in the Verdigris River Drainage in Oklahoma during the summer of 1956 and spring of 1957. A total of 39,649 fish were taken, including 14 families, 32 genera, 68 species and 4 hytrid combinations. ADVISER'S APPROVAL FISHES OF THE VERDIGRIS RIVER IN OKLAHOMA Thesis Approved: Thesis Adviser Dean of the Graduate School TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION ........................................... 1 A. Review of previous collections and collection sites . 1 B. Statement of the problem ....................... 2 C. Description of the River ....................... 2 D. Acknowledgements ............................... 4 II. MATERIALS AND METHODS .................................. 5 A. Collection .................................... 5 B. Preservation .................................. 6 C. Identification ................................ 6 III. OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS ................................ 10 A. Annotated list of collecting sites .............
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of the Status and Habitat Preference of the Neosho Mucket in Oklahoma
    W 2800.7 E56s No. E-34 1994/97 c.3 OKLAHOMA o FEDERAL AID PROJECT E-34 Determinacion of the Status and Habitat Preference II of the Neosho Mucket in Oklahoma PROJECT TITLE: Determination of the status and habitat preference of the Neosho Mucket in Oklahoma Lampsilis rafinesqueana, the Neosho mucket, is a thin, light brown mussel reaching up to 9.5 cm in length (Oesch, 1984). The species is endemic to the Arkansas River system (Obermeyer et al. 1997) and was first described by Frierson (1927) from specimens collected in Oklahoma from the Illinois River near Moodys, Cherokee Co. (Mather, 1990). The species historical range includes the Illinois system in Arkansas (Harris and Gordon, 1987), the Elk, North Fork Spring, and Spring Rivers in Missouri (Stewart, 1992), the Verdigris, Neosho, Spring, Fall, Big Caney and Cottonwood Rivers in Kansas (Stewart, 1992), and the Verdigris,Neosho (Grand), Spring, Caney and Illinois Rivers in Oklahoma (Mather, 1990). A 1989 survey by Mather (Mather, 1990) indicated that the range of the Neosho mucket has declined dramatically in Oklahoma, possibly as a result of reservoir construction. Weathered "fossil" valves of L. rafinesqueana were found in the Verdigris, Spring, Neosho and Caney Rivers. Living specimens and fresh shells were found only in a 55 mile stretch of the Illinois River between Lake Tenkiller and Lake Francis (Mather, 1990). The 1989 survey was not able to determine how broadly distributed the species is within these rivers or determine its abundance relative to other sympatric mussel species. L. rafinesqueana was a C2 candidate for listing as a federal endangered species and a listed state of Oklahoma endangered species.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Special Meeting of the Bartlesville City Council
    Agenda Item 0 NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BARTLESVILLE CITY COUNCIL Monday, March 18, 2019 Council Chambers 7:00 p.m. 401 S. Johnstone Avenue Bartlesville, OK 74003 Mayor Dale Copeland 918-338-4282 AGENDA 1. Call to order the business meeting of the Bartlesville City Council by Mayor Copeland. 2. Roll Call and Establishment of a Quorum. 3. The invocation will be provided by Pastor Jason Elmore, Friday Nite Church and President of the Ministerial Association. 4. Citizens to be heard. 5. City Council Announcements and Proclamations 6. Authorities, Boards, Commissions and Committee Openings There are no openings at this time. 7. Consent Docket a. Approval of Minutes i. The Regular Minutes of March 4, 2019. b. Approval of Agreements and Contracts i. Approve short form contract with J. Graham Construction Inc. for the Police and Fire Memorial project based upon written quotes for services. c. Receipt of Financials i. Interim Financials for the six months ending December 31, 2018. 8. Discuss and take action to award Bid Number 2018-2019-032 for Storm Drain Materials – Reinforced Concrete Box, Storm Drain Manholes and Drainage Inlets. Presented by Terry Lauritsen, Director of Water Utilities. 9. A public hearing to consider and take action on a request by City of Bartlesville staff to close a portion of Silas Avenue (6th Street) lying between Block 47 and Block 54 of the Original Town of Bartlesville, Washington County, Oklahoma, said right-of-way being located between Dewey Avenue and Osage Avenue. Presented by Micah Siemers, P.E. Director of Engineering. 10. City Manager and Staff Reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi- Hazard Mitigation Plan
    City of Claremore, Oklahoma Multi- Hazard Mitigation Plan August 17, 2007 R.D. Flanagan & Associates Planning Consultants 724 Ramm Road Phone: 918-341 -2066 Claremore, OK 74017 Fax: 918-341-6162 Mr. Bill Penka, State Hazard Mitigation Officer August 17,2007 Oklahoma Department of Emergency Management P.O. Box 53365 Oklahoma City, OK 73 152 RE: City of Claremore Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Dear Mr. Penka: We are pleased to submit the City of Claremore Multi-Jurisdictional Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan-2007, as fulfillment of the requirements of the Hazard Mitigation Grant (FEMA- 1401 -DR-OK). This Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, prepared in accordance with state and federal guidance, addresses floodplain management, dam failures, tornadoes, high winds, hailstorms, lightning, winter storms, extreme heat, drought, expansive soils, urban and wild fires, earthquakes, hazardous materials events, and transportation hazards. We look forward to implementing this plan to further protect the lives and properties of our citizens fiom natural and man-made hazards. If we can answer any questions or be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. Powell City Manager City of Claremore Table of Contents Acknowledgements...................................................................................................... xi Executive Summary ................................................................................................... xiii Background...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Floods of April-June 1957 in Oklahoma and Western Arkansas
    Floods of April-June 1957 in Oklahoma and Western Arkansas $y D.L. and C.V. Sullivan Prepared in 000perstion with the State& of Oklahoma and Arkansas, municipal oorporationa, and sonnies of the Moral Government. REPRODt;UEU FROM GEST PREM:E This report on the floods of April-June 1957 in Oklahoma and western Arkansas was prepared in the Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, Luna B. L-co.:11, chief hydr.v.:ic -ngineer, undr the gt-neral direction cf H ,ndriocti, M'_+ la*.a rq...rt prepared under the super-dislon cf A.A. Fir.ctback, Jr., engineer. Basic records of discharge in the area delineated by this reper• were collected in cooperation with the States of Oklahoma and Arkansas, municipal corporations, and agencies of the Federal Government. Acincw- ledgement is made to the Corps of Engin.iers and U.S. leather Bureau for supplied information included in this report. The Surface Water Branch of the GeoloOoal Survey in Lansaw and Missouri, the Ground Water Branch in Oklahoma, and the Bureau of Reclamation area development office in Oklahoma Agave assistance for field surveys of flood flows. COMMENTS Peg, Abstrast..... Intiooduction 2 Tbs storms 4 Storms of April 6 Storms of May..., 6 Storms of :Uno 7 Tbo floods 8 Arkansas River tributary basins in eastern Oklaboms and **stern Arkansas 9 Cimarron, Canadian, and Arkansas River basins.... 11 Red River basin 14 Minor basins 16 Determination of flood disobsrge 16 Summary of flood stages and discharges 17 Records of previous floods 18 :LLUSTRAMONS Page Figure 1. Map showing flood-determination points for floods of April-June 1957 in Oklahoma and Western Arkansas 3 2.
    [Show full text]