DOCSLIB.ORG

Little Rock, Arkansas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS The civil works portion of this District covers an area of the District is responsible for the portion of the Little approximately 36,414 square miles in northern, western, River and its tributaries that are in the state of Arkansas, and southwestern Arkansas and a portion of Missouri. above its mouth near Fulton, AR. In the White River This area is within the Arkansas River, Little River, and Basin, the District is responsible for those portions in White River basins. In the Arkansas River Basin, the southern Missouri and northern and eastern Arkansas in District is responsible for planning, design, construction, the White River drainage basin and its tributaries above operation, and maintenance of the navigation portion of Peach Orchard Bluff, AR. The Memphis District is re- the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System sponsible for navigation maintenance on the White River (MKARNS). The District is also responsible for the below Newport, AR, to the mouth of Wild Goose areas included in the Arkansas River drainage basin Bayou, in Arkansas County, AR. The White River from above Pine Bluff, AR, to below the mouth of the downstream from the mouth of Wild Goose Bayou is Poteau River, near Fort Smith, AR. In Little River Basin, part of the MKARNS. IMPROVEMENTS NAVIGATION Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 1. Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, And KS ........... 3 2. Arthur V. Ormond Lock & Dam (No.9), AR ..... 3 28. Beaver Lake, AR ………………………………9 3. David D. Terry Lock And Dam (No. 6), AR ...... 4 29. Bull Shoals Lake, AR.................................. ….10 4. Emmett Sanders Lock And Dam (No. 4), AR ... 4 30. Darndanelle Lock and Dam (No. 10), AR ....... 10 5. James W. Trimble Lock And Dam (No 13),AR . 4 31. Greers Ferry Lake, AR ..................................... 11 6. Lock No. 2 And Wilbur D. Mills (No. 2), AR .... 4 32. Norfork Lake, AR ............................................ 11 7. Joe Hardin Lock And Dam (No. 3), AR ............ 4 33. Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 12), AR 11 8. Lock And Dam No. 5, AR .................................. 5 34. Table Rock Lake, MO ………………………..12 9. Montgomery Point Lock And Dam, AR............. 5 10. Murray Lock And Dam (No. 7), AR .................. 5 INVESTIGATIONS 11. Norrell Lock And Dam (No. 1) and Entrance Channel, AR ................................... 5 35. May Branch, Fort Smith, AR ........................... 12 12. Toad Suck Ferry Lock And Dam (No. 8), AR ... 5 36. Pine Mountain Lake, AR ................................. 12 13. Maintenance And Repair Fleet And Marine 37. Springfield, MO ............................................... 13 Terminals, AR ............................................... 5 38. Southwest Arkansas Study ............................... 13 14. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................ 5 39. White River Minimum Flows, AR …………...13 15. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization.. 5 CONSTRUCTION FLOOD CONTROL 40. Clearwater Major Rehabilitation Project, 16. Blue Mountain Lake, AR ................................... 6 Clearwater Lake, MO ..................................... 14 17. Clearwater Lake, MO ......................................... 6 41. Arkansas-White Cutoff Containment Structure, 18. DeQueen Lake, AR ............................................ 6 AR, General Reevaluation Study…………… 14 19. Dierks Lake, AR ................................................. 6 42. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation 20. Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR .............. 7 System 12-Foot Channel, AR and OK ............15 21. Gillham Lake, AR .............................................. 7 43. Ozark Powerhouse Major Rehabilitation 22. Little River Basin, AR ........................................ 7 Project, Arkansas River, AR ………………..15 23. Millwood Lake, AR ........................................... 8 24. Nimrod Lake, AR .............................................. 8 25. White River Basin (Little Rock District), CONTINUING AUTHORITY PROGRAM AR & MO ...................................................... 8 NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES (SECTION 107) 26. Inspection Of Completed Flood Control Projects ......................................................... 9 44 Slack Water Harbor, Russellville, AR………....15 27. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .......... 9 37-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2010 EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION (SECTION 14) 45. Batesville Wastewater Treatment Plant, Batesville, AR ................................................. 16 46. Highway 71 @ Red River, Ogden, AR ............ 16 47. Little Piney Creek, Highway 164 ..................... 16 48. Southside Water, White River, Batesville, AR . 16 49. Highway 58, Guion, AR………………………17 50. White River, Augusta, AR…………………… 17 51. Old Grand Glaise, Jackson County, AR………17 52. Paw Paw Bend Road, Conway County, AR… . 17 FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES (SECTION 205) 53. Archey Fork Creek, Clinton, AR........................ 17 54. Hester, Heartsill, and Adamson Greenwood, AR …………………………………………….17 55. Howell Creek, West Plains, MO ........................ 18 56. White River, Oil Trough, MO ............................ 18 57. Prairie Creek, Russellville, AR .......................... 18 58. Otter Creek, Shannon Hills, AR ........................ 18 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION (SECTION 1135) 59. AR River Environmental Restoration Project ... 18 60. Bull Shoals Lake Tailwater Restoration ........... 18 61. Bull Shoals Nursery Pond……………………..18 62. Millwood Lake, Grassy Lake, AR…………….18 63. Rock Creek at Boyle Park, Little Rock, AR ….19 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION (SECTION 206) 64.Coleman Creek, LR, AR……… ......................... 19 65. Shirey Bay Rainey Brake Wildlife Management Area (WMA)................................................... .19 APPENDIX A Table 37-A Cost And Financial Statement ............ 20 Table 37-B Authorizing Legislation ..................... 27 Table 37-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............................................. 29 Table 37-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .................................. 30 Table 37-F Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power ................................................ 35 Table 37-G Deauthorized Projects ........................ 36 37-2 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT NAVIGATION Fort Smith, AR, and Muskogee and Catoosa (Tulsa- Rogers County), OK. Port authorities have been orga- 1. Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, AND KS nized to develop public facilities at North Little Rock, Dardanelle-Russellville, Morrilton, Clarksville, Ozark, Location. The headwaters for the Arkansas River are and Van Buren, AR, and Sallisaw, OK. Terminal facili- in the Rocky Mountains near Leadville, CO. The river ties are in operation or being built at 35 locations in Ar- flows southeastward 1,396 miles through Colorado, kansas and at 25 locations in Oklahoma along the im- Kansas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas to join the Mississippi proved waterways. River 599 miles above Head of Passes, LA. Operations during fiscal year. Previous projects. For details see page 1066, An- nual Report for 1932, and pages 744, 864, and 881, An- Flood damages prevented by Little Rock District le- nual Report for 1943. vee projects in the Arkansas River Basin during FY10 are estimated at $54,769,000; flood losses prevented Existing project. The MKARNS provides naviga- through FY10 are estimated at $1,639,163,000. tion, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife prop- Approximately 11.3 million tons of commerce was agation improvements in the Arkansas River Basin. The moved on the Arkansas portion of the MKARNS during MKARNS provides a navigation channel 9 feet deep and calendar year 2010. Details of the MKARNS and lakes 444.8 miles long. The channel begins at the mouth of in Arkansas are shown on the following pages. the White River, which enters the Mississippi River 599 FY10 withdrawals for water supply purposes were miles above Head of Passes, LA, thence 9.8 miles up- 94.49 acre-feet from Nimrod Lake. stream to the mouth of Wild Goose Bayou; thence 9.2 miles by a land cut, designated as Arkansas Post Canal The annual dredging contract was awarded. Due to to mile 42 (1943 survey) on the Arkansas River; thence the flooding events in the spring months of 2008, both 376.0 miles to the mouth of the Verdigris River at navi- Little Rock and Tulsa districts developed serious shoal- gation mile 395.0; thence 49.8 miles up the Verdigris ing. The dredge started in Little Rock District cleaning River to the head of navigation at Catoosa, OK. A 12 shoaling areas, moving upstream to Tulsa District. Tem- foot channel depth was authorized by Section 136 of PL porary relief measures (clamming with in-house labor 108-137 in 2004. Construction of the 12 foot channel and pool deviations) helped both districts maintain navi- depth began in 2006. gation on the MKARNS. The waterway is canalized throughout its length by An IDIQ Bank Stabilization contract was awarded in 18 locks and dams with a total lift of 420 feet. Darda- FY09.In FY10 work was completed in Pools 3, 7, 10 and nelle, Ozark-Jeta Taylor, Robert S. Kerr, and Webbers 12 totaling about $6.6 million. Falls are multiple purpose projects that include hydro- Installation of the Motor Control Center (MCC) at power. Lock chambers are 110 by 600 feet. A mini- Murray Lock & Dam (No. 7) and Toad Suck Ferry Lock mum channel width of 150 feet is provided for the Ver- & Dam (No. 8) was completed in FY09. In FY10, the digris
Recommended publications
  • Office Fife Copy When Borrowed Return Promptly

    Office Fife Copy When Borrowed Return Promptly

    Bureau or Reclamation HYDRAULICS BRANCH OFFICE FIFE COPY WHEN BORROWED RETURN PROMPTLY PAP-470 Vibration of Outlet Pipes, Glen Canyon Dam August 10, 1984 H. T. Falvey K. W. Frizell C. D. Maytum INFORMATIONAL ROUTING D- 45 4P, Memorandum Denver, Colorado Head, Gates and Valves Section DATE: August 10. 1984 Chief, Hydraulics Branch ; ID i Chief, Mechanical Branch I - H. T. Falvey (D-1530A), K. W. Frizell (D-1532), C. D. Maytum (D-2! C-------- Vibration of Outlet Pipes, Glen Canyon Dam I Introduction — During operation of the outlet tubes in 1983, rough operation and were noted for gate openings greater than 75 percent at a reservo „ " .. GPO 8523 vation of 3704.2 (report of telephone conversation June 22, 1983, from Gamble to Burgi). The flow rate which produced smoother operation through each valve was 4,200 ft3/s. In an effort to learn the cause of the noise and vibration, Frizell and Elgin conducted field measurements on all four outlet tubes on June 19, 1984, see appendix. They discovered that the outlet tubes in the vicinity of the dresser couplings had a maximum peak-to- peak displacement of 3.47 mils (0.089 mm) at a frequency of about 176 Hz. This frequency corresponds approximately to the audible tone of F below middle C. Their measurements were made with a gate opening of 81 percent. This opening produced a discharge of 4,350 ft3/s per valve at a reservoir elevation of 3697.45. Possible causes for the noise include: a. Cavitation of the valve or man door b.
  • The Water Monitor the WATER MONITOR Fall 2009/Winter 2010 Volume 2, Issue 2

    The Water Monitor the WATER MONITOR Fall 2009/Winter 2010 Volume 2, Issue 2

    Page 1 The Water Monitor THE WATER MONITOR Fall 2009/Winter 2010 Volume 2, Issue 2 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality-Water Quality Planning Division TCEQ’s New Office of Water INSIDE THIS ISSUE By TCEQ Media Relations TCEQ’s New Office of Water 1 The TCEQ recently announced the formation of a new Updates from the SWQM Program 1 Office of Water, effective December 1st, 2009. The new USIBWC CRP Photo Gallery 2 office encompasses the three existing major water Annual SWQM Workshop Wrap-up 2 divisions in the agency: Water Planning, Water Supply, Oso Bay Cleanup 3 and Water Quality. Oso Bay Water Quality 3 The Circle of Life 5 L’Oreal Stepney will serve as deputy director of the new Master Plan for the Oso Bay Watershed 5 Office of Water. She has served with the TCEQ and Should You Measure Chlorine Residual in the Field 6 predecessor agencies since 1992 in air permitting and Addressing Bacteria Issues on the Rio Grande 7 wastewater permitting, as Water Quality Division director, Critter of the Quarter 8 and most recently as assistant deputy director for the EPA Releases First-Ever Baseline Study of US Lakes 9 Office of Permitting and Registration. She holds a Photo Gallery 10 master’s degree in Environmental Engineering from the University of Texas. former Rio Grande Watermaster Carlos Rubinstein. “Our agency’s response to the people and communities that “The new office is in recognition of the fact that the suffered from this event was extraordinary, and this new state’s population is expected to double in the next 30 Office of Water will ensure that we provide an even years, so the agency must put even more focus on water higher and more focused level of response.” “Water issues to ensure that there will be adequate water quality planning, water supply, and water quality are all issues and quantity for future demand,” said Chairman Bryan W.
  • 2020 Draft Basin Highlights Report an Overview of Water Quality Issues Throughout the Canadian and Red River Basins

    2020 Draft Basin Highlights Report an Overview of Water Quality Issues Throughout the Canadian and Red River Basins

    2020 DRAFT BASIN HIGHLIGHTS REPORT AN OVERVIEW OF WATER QUALITY ISSUES THROUGHOUT THE CANADIAN AND RED RIVER BASINS The preparation of this report was financed through and in cooperation with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality North Fork Red River at FM 2473 2020 Canadian and Red River Basins Highlights Report ~ Page 2020 Canadian and Red River Basins Highlights Report ~ Page 2 Lake Texoma at US 377 Bridge TABLE OF CONTENTS CANADIAN AND RED RIVER BASIN VICINITY MAP 4 INTRODUCTION 5 Public Involvement Basin Advisory Committee Meeting 6 Coordinated Monitoring Meeting 7 Zebra Mussels Origin, Transportation, Impact, Texas Bound, Current Populations, and Studies 8 Texas Legislation Action 9 CANADIAN AND RED RIVER BASINS WATER QUALITY OVERVIEW AND HIGHLIGHTS Canadian and Red River Basins Water Quality Overview, 2018 Texas IR Overview 10 TABLES Canadian River Basin 2018 Texas IR Impairment Listing 11 Red River Basin 2018 Texas IR Impairment Listing 12 Water Quality Monitoring Field Parameters, Conventional Laboratory Parameters Red River Authority Environmental Services Laboratory Environmental Services Division 15 2020 Canadian and Red River Basins Highlights Report ~ Page 3 2020 Canadian and Red River Basins Highlights Report ~ Page 4 INTRODUCTION In 1991, the Texas Legislature enacted the Texas Clean Rivers Act (Senate Bill 818) in order to assess water quality for each river basin in the state. From this, the Clean Rivers Program (CRP) was created and has become one of the most successful cooperative efforts between federal, state, and local agen- cies and the citizens of the State of Texas. It is implemented by the Texas Commission on Environ- mental Quality (TCEQ) through local partner agencies to achieve the CRP’s primary goal of maintain- ing and improving the water quality in each river basin.
  • Some Dam – Hydro Newstm

    Some Dam – Hydro Newstm

    9/19/2014 Some Dam – Hydro News TM And Other Stuff i Quote of Note: “Wine is constant proof that God loves us and loves to see us happy.” - - Benjamin Franklin Some Dam - Hydro News Newsletter Archive for Back Issues and Search http://npdp.stanford.edu/ Click on Link (Some Dam - Hydro News) Bottom Right - Under Perspectives “Good wine is a necessity of life.” - -Thomas Jefferson Ron’s wine pick of the week: 2011 Luca Syrah & Shiraz (Other than French) "Laborde Double Select" “ No nation was ever drunk when wine was cheap. ” - - Thomas Jefferson Dams: NC says Duke Energy coal ash dams are high hazard risk By John Murawski, newsobserver.com, September 5, 2014 State officials said two dams at a Duke Energy power plant pose a “high hazard” of killing downstream residents if they were to breach and spill, as regulators begin a systematic safety review of 49 coal ash lagoons and cooling ponds across North Carolina. One of the two dams at the W.H. Weatherspoon Power Plant near Lumberton had previously been classified as posing an intermediate risk, requiring a safety inspection once every five years, while the other dam was exempt from safety inspections. One pond contains coal ash; the other stores water in a cooling pond. A high hazard rating by the state Department of Environment and Natural Resources calls for increasing annual inspections for structural integrity to once a year. “If the coal ash storage pond were to fail, material from the coal ash storage area would likely flow southeast and could impact four occupied homes located closely together on the east side of both the coal ash storage pond and the cooling pond,” said DENR spokesman Jamie Kritzer.
  • Classified Stream Segments and Assessments Units Covered by Hb 4146

    Classified Stream Segments and Assessments Units Covered by Hb 4146

    CLASSIFIED STREAM SEGMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS UNITS COVERED BY HB 4146 SEG ID River Basin Description Met criteria 0216 Red Wichita River Below Lake Kemp Dam 96.43% 0222 Red Salt Fork Red River 95.24% 0224 Red North Fork Red River 90.91% 1250 Brazos South Fork San Gabriel River 93.75% 1251 Brazos North Fork San Gabriel River 93.55% 1257 Brazos Brazos River Below Lake Whitney 90.63% 1415 Colorado Llano River 94.39% 1424 Colorado Middle Concho/South Concho River 95.24% 1427 Colorado Onion Creek 93.43% 1430 Colorado Barton Creek 98.25% 1806 Guadalupe Guadalupe River Above Canyon Lake 96.37% 1809 Guadalupe Lower Blanco River 95.83% 1811 Guadalupe Comal River 98.90% 1812 Guadalupe Guadalupe River Below Canyon Dam 96.98% 1813 Guadalupe Upper Blanco River 95.45% 1815 Guadalupe Cypress Creek 99.19% 1816 Guadalupe Johnson Creek 97.30% AU ID River Basin Description Met criteria 1817 Guadalupe North Fork Guadalupe River 100.00% 1414_01 Colorado Pedernales River 93.10% 1818 Guadalupe South Fork Guadalupe River 97.30% 1414_03 Colorado Pedernales River 91.38% 1905 San Antonio Medina River Above Medina Lake 100.00% 1416_05 Colorado San Saba River 100.00% 2111 Nueces Upper Sabinal River 100.00% Colorado River Below Lady Bird Lake 2112 Nueces Upper Nueces River 95.96% 1428_03 Colorado (formally Town Lake) 91.67% 2113 Nueces Upper Frio River 100.00% Medina River Below Medina 1903_04 San Antonio Diversion Lake 90.00% 2114 Nueces Hondo Creek 93.48% Medina River Below Medina 2115 Nueces Seco Creek 95.65% 1903_05 San Antonio Diversion Lake 96.84% 2309 Rio Grande Devils River 96.67% 1908_02 San Antonio Upper Cibolo Creek 97.67% 2310 Rio Grande Lower Pecos River 93.88% 2304_10 Rio Grande Rio Grande Below Amistad Reservoir 95.95% 2313 Rio Grande San Felipe Creek 95.45% 2311_01 Rio Grande Upper Pecos River 92.86% A detailed map of covered segments and assessment units can be found on the TCEQ website https://www.tceq.texas.gov/gis/nonpoint-source-project-viewer .
  • United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land

    United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land

    United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 1 Texas - 48 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp. Date Cong. Element Approved District ANDERSON 396 - XXX D PALESTINE PICNIC AND CAMPING PARK CITY OF PALESTINE $136,086.77 C 8/23/1976 3/1/1979 2 719 - XXX D COMMUNITY FOREST PARK CITY OF PALESTINE $275,500.00 C 8/23/1979 8/31/1985 2 ANDERSON County Total: $411,586.77 County Count: 2 ANDREWS 931 - XXX D ANDREWS MUNICIPAL POOL CITY OF ANDREWS $237,711.00 C 12/6/1984 12/1/1989 19 ANDREWS County Total: $237,711.00 County Count: 1 ANGELINA 19 - XXX C DIBOLL CITY PARK CITY OF DIBOLL $174,500.00 C 10/7/1967 10/1/1971 2 215 - XXX A COUSINS LAND PARK CITY OF LUFKIN $113,406.73 C 8/4/1972 6/1/1973 2 297 - XXX D LUFKIN PARKS IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LUFKIN $49,945.00 C 11/29/1973 1/1/1977 2 512 - XXX D MORRIS FRANK PARK CITY OF LUFKIN $236,249.00 C 5/20/1977 1/1/1980 2 669 - XXX D OLD ORCHARD PARK CITY OF DIBOLL $235,066.00 C 12/5/1978 12/15/1983 2 770 - XXX D LUFKIN TENNIS IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LUFKIN $51,211.42 C 6/30/1980 6/1/1985 2 879 - XXX D HUNTINGTON CITY PARK CITY OF HUNTINGTON $35,313.56 C 9/26/1983 9/1/1988 2 ANGELINA County Total: $895,691.71 County Count: 7 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 2 Texas - 48 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp.
  • Stormwater Management Program 2013-2018 Appendix A

    Stormwater Management Program 2013-2018 Appendix A

    Appendix A 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) As required under Sections 303(d) and 304(a) of the federal Clean Water Act, this list identifies the water bodies in or bordering Texas for which effluent limitations are not stringent enough to implement water quality standards, and for which the associated pollutants are suitable for measurement by maximum daily load. In addition, the TCEQ also develops a schedule identifying Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) that will be initiated in the next two years for priority impaired waters. Issuance of permits to discharge into 303(d)-listed water bodies is described in the TCEQ regulatory guidance document Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (January 2003, RG-194). Impairments are limited to the geographic area described by the Assessment Unit and identified with a six or seven-digit AU_ID. A TMDL for each impaired parameter will be developed to allocate pollutant loads from contributing sources that affect the parameter of concern in each Assessment Unit. The TMDL will be identified and counted using a six or seven-digit AU_ID. Water Quality permits that are issued before a TMDL is approved will not increase pollutant loading that would contribute to the impairment identified for the Assessment Unit. Explanation of Column Headings SegID and Name: The unique identifier (SegID), segment name, and location of the water body. The SegID may be one of two types of numbers. The first type is a classified segment number (4 digits, e.g., 0218), as defined in Appendix A of the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (TSWQS).
  • Proposed Wisconsin – Lake Michigan National Marine Sanctuary

    Proposed Wisconsin – Lake Michigan National Marine Sanctuary

    Proposed Wisconsin – Lake Michigan National Marine Sanctuary Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Draft Management Plan DECEMBER 2016 | sanctuaries.noaa.gov/wisconsin/ National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) U.S. Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and NOAA Administrator Kathryn D. Sullivan, Ph.D. Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone Management National Ocean Service W. Russell Callender, Ph.D. Office of National Marine Sanctuaries John Armor, Director Matt Brookhart, Acting Deputy Director Cover Photos: Top: The schooner Walter B. Allen. Credit: Tamara Thomsen, Wisconsin Historical Society. Bottom: Photomosaic of the schooner Walter B. Allen. Credit: Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution - Advanced Imaging and Visualization Laboratory. 1 Abstract In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and the National Marine Sanctuaries Act (NMSA, 16 U.S.C. 1434 et seq.), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS) has prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) that considers alternatives for the proposed designation of Wisconsin - Lake Michigan as a National Marine Sanctuary. The proposed action addresses NOAA’s responsibilities under the NMSA to identify, designate, and protect areas of the marine and Great Lakes environment with special national significance due to their conservation, recreational, ecological, historical, scientific, cultural, archaeological, educational, or aesthetic qualities as national marine sanctuaries. ONMS has developed five alternatives for the designation, and the DEIS evaluates the environmental consequences of each under NEPA. The DEIS also serves as a resource assessment under the NMSA, documenting present and potential uses of the areas considered in the alternatives.
  • Matching the Hatch for the TX Hill Country[2]

    Matching the Hatch for the TX Hill Country[2]

    MATCHING THE HATCH FOR THE TX HILL COUNTRY Tying and choosing proper fly patterns to increase your success on the water. Matt Bennett Fly Geek Custom Flies [email protected] Why should you listen to me? • Fishing the Austin area since 2008 • LWFF – 2012 through 2015 • Fly Geek Custom Flies – 2015 – now • Past Austin Fly Fishers President • Current TX Council Vice President Overview of the TX Hill Country Llano River near Kingsland Guadalupe River at Lazy L&L Brushy Creek near Round Rock Characteristics of Hill Country Rivers ¨ There’s a bunch! Guadalupe, Comal, San Marcos, Colorado, Llano, Blanco, Nueces, Frio, Sabinal, Concho, Lampasas and associated feeder creeks ¨ Majority are shallow and wadeable in stretches ¨ Extremely Clear Water (some clearer than others) ¨ Sandy, limestone and granite bottoms with lots of granite boulders/outcroppings ¨ Extreme flooding events YEARLY on average. Sept 11, 1952 – Lake Travis rises 57 feet in 14 hours. 23-26” of rain Guadalupe River, July 17,1987 Llano River / Lake LBJ – Nov. 4 2000 Why does flooding matter to fishing? ¨ Because of the almost-annual flooding / drought cycle of our rivers, they are constantly changing ¨ Holes get filled in and dug out, gravel gets moved around, banks get undercut ¨ We have to constantly relearn our fisheries to stay successful on the water ¨ Choosing the right flies with the proper triggers is an important part of your success on the water Overview of our forage Baitfish, crawfish, insects, and other terrestrials Why is forage important? ¨ #1 rule of all fishing – know your forage! ¨ Knowing the common forage where you fish increases your chances of success as it clues you in on what flies you should be fishing ¨ Forage base will vary between water bodies, time of year, species targeted, and more, as well as year-to-year.
  • NWS Instruction 10-605, Tropical Cyclone Official Geographic Defining Points, Dated March 17, 2020

    NWS Instruction 10-605, Tropical Cyclone Official Geographic Defining Points, Dated March 17, 2020

    Department of Commerce •National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration •National Weather Service NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE INSTRUCTION 10-605 MARCH 4, 2021 Operations and Services Tropical Cyclone Weather Services Program, NWSPD 10-6 TROPICAL CYCLONE OFFICIAL GEOGRAPHIC DEFINING POINTS NOTICE: This publication is available at: http://www.nws.noaa.gov/directives/. OPR: W/AFS26 (J. Cline) Certified by: W/AFS2 (A. Allen) Type of Issuance: Emergency SUMMARY OF REVISIONS: This directive supersedes NWS Instruction 10-605, Tropical Cyclone Official Geographic Defining Points, dated March 17, 2020. The following revisions were made to this directive: • Rename the current “Port Mansfield” breakpoint to “North of Port Mansfield”, TX. • Add a breakpoint at the Coastal Willacy/Coastal Cameron, TX county line. • Move Indian Pass, FL from the city to the geographical feature. • Remove Panama City, Apalachicola, St. Marks and Keaton Beach as breakpoints. • Add Wakulla/Jefferson County line (FL) as a breakpoint. • Remove New River Inlet, NC as a breakpoint. • Add Beaufort Inlet, NC as a breakpoint. • Add Hatteras Inlet, NC as a breakpoint. • Add Teraina Atoll under Honolulu, HI (Other Central Pacific Islands) as a breakpoint • Add Tabuaeran Atoll under Honolulu, HI (Other Central Pacific Islands) as a breakpoint • Add Kiritimati (Christmas) Island under Honolulu, HI (Other Central Pacific Islands) as a breakpoint Digitally signed by STERN.ANDRE STERN.ANDREW.D.13829 W.D.13829203 20348 Date: 2021.02.18 08:45:54 2/18/2021 48 -05'00' Andrew D. Stern Date Director Analyze, Forecast and Support Office NWSI 10-605 MARCH 4, 2021 OFFICIAL DEFINING POINTS FOR TROPICAL CYCLONE WATCHES AND WARNINGS *An asterisk following a breakpoint indicates the use of the breakpoint includes land areas adjacent to the body of water.
  • N1.01 GAME FISH DAILY LIMITS 05-17 Alligator Gar 1 Black Basses

    N1.01 GAME FISH DAILY LIMITS 05-17 Alligator Gar 1 Black Basses

    N1.01 GAME FISH DAILY LIMITS 05-17 Alligator Gar 1 Black Basses (including not more than four Smallmouth) 10 Bream (over 4 inches length) 50 Catfish (except Bullhead) 10 Crappie 30 Rock Bass 10 Muskellunge 6 Paddlefish 2 Pickerel 6 Sauger 6 Saugeye 6 Shovelnose Sturgeon No Limit Striped Bass or Hybrid (Combination) 6 Trout (including not more than: 2 brown trout, 2 cutthroat trout, 2 brook trout) 5 Walleye 6 White Bass 25 EXCEPTIONS: (9) TROUT (BROOK, BROWN, CUTTHROAT, RAINBOW): (A) Brown trout: White River from Bull Shoals Dam to Highway 58 Bridge (Bull Shoals Tailwater) and North Fork White River (Norfork Tailwater) – minimum length 24 inches, daily limit one; only one of trout daily limit may be longer than 14 inches. Spavinaw Creek (Benton County) west of Arkansas Highway 59 and Spring River – minimum length 16 inches, daily limit two. Little Red River from Greers Ferry Dam to Arkansas Highway 305 Bridge (Greers Ferry Tailwater) – daily limit of five (only one of trout daily limit may be longer than 16 inches). White River from Beaver Dam to boundary signs at Houseman Access (Beaver Tailwater) – protected slot limit of 13-16 inches, daily limit of five (only one of trout daily limit may be longer than 16 inches). Little Missouri River from Narrows Dam to Arkansas Highway 27 Bridge (Narrows Tailwater) – all brown trout must be released immediately. (B) Cutthroat trout: White River from Bull Shoals Dam to Highway 58 Bridge (Bull Shoals Tailwater), North Fork White River (Norfork Tailwater) – minimum length 24 inches, daily limit of one; only one of trout daily limit may be longer than 14 inches.
  • Hunting & Fishing Regulations H

    Hunting & Fishing Regulations H

    2017-2018 2017-2018 2017-2018 Hunting & Fishing Regulations Regulations Regulations Fishing Fishing & & Hunting Hunting Hunting & Fishing Regulations FISHING FOR A RECORD RECORD A FOR FISHING FISHING FOR A RECORD BY AUBRY BUZEK BUZEK AUBRY BY BY AUBRY BUZEK ENTER OUR SWEEPSTAKES SWEEPSTAKES OUR ENTER ENTER OUR SWEEPSTAKES PAGE 102 102 PAGE PAGE 102 2017-2018 2017-2018 2017-2018 2017-2018 TEXAS PARKS & WILDLIFE WILDLIFE WILDLIFE & & PARKS PARKS TEXAS TEXAS TEXAS PARKS & WILDLIFE OUTDOOROUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOROUTDOOR 6/15/17 4:14 PM 4:14 6/15/17 Download the Mobile App OutdoorAnnual.com/app OutdoorAnnual.com/app App Mobile the 1 Download OA-2017_AC.indd Download the Mobile App OutdoorAnnual.com/app 6/15/17 4:12 PM 4:12 6/15/17 1 2017_OA_cover_FINAL.indd 2017_OA_cover_FINAL.indd 1 6/15/17 4:12 PM 6/15/17 4:12 PM 2017_OA_cover_FINAL.indd 1 ANNUALANNANNUAL AL U ANN ANN ANN ANN ANN ANNUAL ANN ANN ANN ANNUALANNANNUAL AL U ANN ANN ANN ANN ANN ANNUAL ANNUAL ANNUALANN ANNUALANN ANN ANN ANN 2017_OA_cover_FINAL.indd 1 6/15/17 4:12 PM PM 4:12 6/15/17 ANNUAL 1 2017_OA_cover_FINAL.indd 2017_OA_cover_FINAL.indd 1 6/15/17 4:12 PM Download the Mobile App Mobile the Download Download the Mobile App OutdoorAnnual.com/app Download the Mobile App OutdoorAnnual.com/app OutdoorAnnual.com/app OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR TEXAS PARKS & WILDLIFE TEXAS PARKS & WILDLIFE WILDLIFE WILDLIFE & & PARKS