OCWP Update 95

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

OCWP Update 95 Overview of Water and Related Resources Part 1 History of Water Resource Development cute interest in water and water development began before statehood. The oldest right for the use A of stream water (a water right that is still valid) was issued to a farm family near Boise City in 1899. Their claim entitled them to a prior right of 52 acre-feet per year from Marcelus Canyon Creek, a tributary of the Cimarron River, for the irrigation of 26 acres of land. The water right is numbered 99-1, signifying the year 1899, permit number one. The oldest right to the use of groundwater is that of the City of Norman, claiming a prior right to 12 acre-feet of water per year from the Garber-Wellington Aquifer, based on municipal use dating back to 1894. In 1902, President Theodore Roosevelt signed into law the Reclamation Act to aid arid western states, and the following year investigations were begun in Oklahoma Territory to determine how water supplies could be beneficially used. The Eighth Legislative Assembly of Oklahoma Territory enacted the first water law in 1905, outlining the procedure for acquiring water rights, regulating the use of water and creating the post of territorial engineer. With the coming of statehood, the office of territorial engineer became state engineer, responsibilities of that post were expanded and new water laws were enacted. Many of those original laws, which primarily spelled out water ownership and irrigation rights, remain in effect and have since been extended to include municipal and industrial water supply, streamflow regulation, water resource planning, water quali- ty regulation and data collection. Of course, as the population increased, so did the number of water users and problems related to water use. In the 1920s, the Conservation Commission was created to deal with the states expanding water issues. Also at that time, Oklahoma citizens were drinking water for the first time from new Lake Overholser and Tulsa had just completed its water supply, Spavinaw Lake. 15 As the seeds of the Great Depression ma A&M College, and soon after, Grand 60s. In Oklahoma, the first four years of were being sown, the attention of the River Dam Authority completed Grand the fifties produced four major reservoirs: nation turned to flooding on the Missis- Lake O the Cherokees on the Grand Heyburn in 1950, Hulah in 1951, and Ten- sippi River. The river mocked and devas- (Neosho) River in northeastern Oklaho- killer and Fort Gibson in 1953 -- all projects tated the people of its valley. Although ma. In addition, two Corps of Engineers of the Corps of Engineers. the Corps of Engineers built levees high- lakes authorized by the Flood Control Act, In 1955, House Joint Resolution 520 er and higher and invested $300 million Great Salt Plains and Fort Supply, were created a water study committee com- along the lower Mississippi between 1886 completed early in the 1940s. posed of legislators and citizens, and and 1926, they met with little success in The years of searing drought in the chaired by Dr. Lloyd E. Church, of Wil- controlling the river and its tributaries west and devastating floods in the east burton. The committee surveyed Okla- which again left their banks in the cata- outraged Oklahomans and called conser- homas water problems and recommend- strophic floods of the 1920s. Finally, a plan vationists, flood control advocates and ed the establishment of a separate water emerged to hold back floods by construct- navigation interests to march, but not authority with responsibilities in water ing upstream storage basins in the veins before the Arkansas River had again ram- rights administration, federal contracts pouring into the Mississippi -- a revolu- paged in 1943. Beginning May 7, rain fell negotiation and the development of state tionary strategy originating from similar for days on end; skies cleared only to suc- and local projects to assure the most ef- problems in Oklahoma City. cumb to faint and faraway rumbles of ficient use of all water resources. In 1957, The North Canadian River regularly thunder heralding still more storms. Nine- the Twenty-Sixth Oklahoma Legislature washed over the flat capital city in the ty percent of the crops over hundreds of authorized creation of the Oklahoma Wa- spring while, in late summer, streams dried square miles were destroyed. In some plac- ter Resources Board, a panel of seven up and water supplies diminished. In the es, 15 inches of rain fell in two days; Tulsa chaired by Guy H. James. In 1972, two 1923 record flood, the rampaging river had 16 inches of almost continual rain- at-large seats were added to the Board. broke the Lake Overholser municipal wa- fall. The Arkansas climbed to six feet over Most of the states major reservoir ter dam and washed out nearly every wag- flood stage at Muskogee and, in a 500- construction has occurred since 1959, on and railroad bridge in the central part mile swath of reckless anger, the river with that year seeing completion of Fort of the state. This made a powerful case for rolled on, plunging fertile farms to the Cobb, followed by Foss Reservoir in holding more water in upstream reservoirs. bottom of a deep, mud-stained lake. 1961; Oologahs initial phase in 1963; In the flood of 1927, water levels on the Three years later, a comprehensive Keystone, Eufaula, and Hudson in 1964; Arkansas River were the highest in 99 years. plan of development for the Arkansas Riv- Thunderbird in 1965; Lake of the Arbuck- The entire Mississippi Valley was an enor- er -- uniting advocates of soil and water les in 1967; Pine Creek in 1969; and Bro- mous muddy reservoir a thousand miles conservation, hydropower, flood control ken Bow in 1970. The seventies brought long and 50 to 150 miles wide. and navigation -- was authorized by Con- to completion Robert S. Kerr and Web- By the early 1930s, rural Oklahoma gress through the River and Harbor Act. bers Falls Reservoirs in 1970; Hugo in farm families, burned out by drought and While eastern Oklahoma was water- 1974; Tom Steed in 1975; Kaw in 1976; hot, dry winds, retreated from their tor- logged with repeated floods, the arid west Waurika and Birch in 1977; and Optima tured lands to regroup farther west. Mean- had focused on developing a reservoir in 1978. Prior to 1990, five more reser- while, dry fields piled up in high sand for irrigation, with the added benefits of voirs had been completed: Sardis in dunes while lighter silt rose in dust clouds, flood control and water supply. The W.C. 1982; Copan in 1983; Skiatook in 1984; some five miles high, and swept east to Austin Project (Lugert-Altus Reservoir), a Arcadia in 1986; and McGee Creek in the Atlantic in black blizzards. During a project of the Bureau of Reclamation, was 1987. Although construction of Candy single day in 1934, it is estimated that completed in 1948. Lake, in Osage County, was partially com- some 300 million tons of soil were swept Spurred by a Congressional appropri- plete in 1990, a dispute concerning pe- from the Great Plains. Armies of Civilian ation in 1949, the U.S. Army Corps of En- troleum/mineral rights at the site forced Conservation Corps (CCC) and Soil Con- gineers began construction in Oklahoma abandonment of the project. servation Service (SCS) workers moved on the largest civil works project it had Seven lakes authorized for federal con- over the land, healing it with plantings of ever undertaken. Completed in 1971, struction, but not yet funded, could add to grass and shelter belts, filling in deep gul- some 63 years after the last of the river Oklahomas future surface water supply. lies and coaching farmers in conserva- steamers had climbed the Arkansas River They are Candy (still authorized); Lukfata, tion practices. from Fort Smith to Muskogee, the McClel- on the Glover River in McCurtain County; In response to widespread water prob- lan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation Boswell, on Boggy Creek in Choctaw Coun- lems, the Oklahoma Legislature created System was named in tribute to two ty; Sand, on Sand Creek in Osage County; the State Planning and Resources Board far-sighted statesmen who had la- Shidler, on Salt Creek in Osage County; Tus- in 1935 and included in its jurisdiction bored to see the vast inland water- kahoma, on the Kiamichi River in Pushma- parks, forestry and water resources. In way project become a reality. taha County; and Parker, on Muddy Boggy 1937, Lake Murray was completed in Mur- One of these water boomers, Sena- Creek in Coal County. ray County as a project of the state while tor Robert S. Kerr -- elected governor in the CCC and Works Progress Administra- 1943, U.S. Senator in 1948, then appoint- Water Resources tion continued to work on bank stabiliza- ed to the powerful Public Works Commit- tion and other water-related tasks. Lake tee -- was also instrumental in setting in Oklahoma is blessed with abundant Carl Blackwell, a project of the SCS, was motion an enormous program of water water resources, both on the surface and completed as a water supply for Oklaho- development throughout the 1950s and underground, that provide ample supply 16 for various uses. The amount of water the Pleistocene Epoch, a time character- the Cherokees. By surface area, the larg- withdrawn from groundwater sources ized by significant erosion. The Red River est lake is Eufaula, covering approxi- slightly exceeds that of surface water; drains the southern one-third of the state mately 105,500 acres, followed by Tex- however, on an annual basis, use of the while the Arkansas River drains the re- oma and Grand Lake.
Recommended publications
  • Notropis Girardi) and Peppered Chub (Macrhybopsis Tetranema)
    Arkansas River Shiner and Peppered Chub SSA, October 2018 Species Status Assessment Report for the Arkansas River Shiner (Notropis girardi) and Peppered Chub (Macrhybopsis tetranema) Arkansas River shiner (bottom left) and peppered chub (top right - two fish) (Photo credit U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) Arkansas River Shiner and Peppered Chub SSA, October 2018 Version 1.0a October 2018 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 2 Albuquerque, NM This document was prepared by Angela Anders, Jennifer Smith-Castro, Peter Burck (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) – Southwest Regional Office) Robert Allen, Debra Bills, Omar Bocanegra, Sean Edwards, Valerie Morgan (USFWS –Arlington, Texas Field Office), Ken Collins, Patricia Echo-Hawk, Daniel Fenner, Jonathan Fisher, Laurence Levesque, Jonna Polk (USFWS – Oklahoma Field Office), Stephen Davenport (USFWS – New Mexico Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office), Mark Horner, Susan Millsap (USFWS – New Mexico Field Office), Jonathan JaKa (USFWS – Headquarters), Jason Luginbill, and Vernon Tabor (Kansas Field Office). Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2018. Species status assessment report for the Arkansas River shiner (Notropis girardi) and peppered chub (Macrhybopsis tetranema), version 1.0, with appendices. October 2018. Albuquerque, NM. 172 pp. Arkansas River Shiner and Peppered Chub SSA, October 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES.1 INTRODUCTION (CHAPTER 1) The Arkansas River shiner (Notropis girardi) and peppered chub (Macrhybopsis tetranema) are restricted primarily to the contiguous river segments of the South Canadian River basin spanning eastern New Mexico downstream to eastern Oklahoma (although the peppered chub is less widespread). Both species have experienced substantial declines in distribution and abundance due to habitat destruction and modification from stream dewatering or depletion from diversion of surface water and groundwater pumping, construction of impoundments, and water quality degradation.
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas Fishing Regulations Summary
    2 Kansas Fishing 0 Regulations 0 5 Summary The new Community Fisheries Assistance Program (CFAP) promises to increase opportunities for anglers to fish close to home. For detailed information, see Page 16. PURCHASE FISHING LICENSES AND VIEW WEEKLY FISHING REPORTS ONLINE AT THE DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE AND PARKS' WEBSITE, WWW.KDWP.STATE.KS.US TABLE OF CONTENTS Wildlife and Parks Offices, e-mail . Zebra Mussel, White Perch Alerts . State Record Fish . Lawful Fishing . Reservoirs, Lakes, and River Access . Are Fish Safe To Eat? . Definitions . Fish Identification . Urban Fishing, Trout, Fishing Clinics . License Information and Fees . Special Event Permits, Boats . FISH Access . Length and Creel Limits . Community Fisheries Assistance . Becoming An Outdoors-Woman (BOW) . Common Concerns, Missouri River Rules . Master Angler Award . State Park Fees . WILDLIFE & PARKS OFFICES KANSAS WILDLIFE & Maps and area brochures are available through offices listed on this page and from the PARKS COMMISSION department website, www.kdwp.state.ks.us. As a cabinet-level agency, the Kansas Office of the Secretary AREA & STATE PARK OFFICES Department of Wildlife and Parks is adminis- 1020 S Kansas Ave., Rm 200 tered by a secretary of Wildlife and Parks Topeka, KS 66612-1327.....(785) 296-2281 Cedar Bluff SP....................(785) 726-3212 and is advised by a seven-member Wildlife Cheney SP .........................(316) 542-3664 and Parks Commission. All positions are Pratt Operations Office Cheyenne Bottoms WA ......(620) 793-7730 appointed by the governor with the commis- 512 SE 25th Ave. Clinton SP ..........................(785) 842-8562 sioners serving staggered four-year terms. Pratt, KS 67124-8174 ........(620) 672-5911 Council Grove WA..............(620) 767-5900 Serving as a regulatory body for the depart- Crawford SP .......................(620) 362-3671 ment, the commission is a non-partisan Region 1 Office Cross Timbers SP ..............(620) 637-2213 board, made up of no more than four mem- 1426 Hwy 183 Alt., P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration and Maintenance of the Access to the Neosho River at Jacobs Creek-John Redmond Reservoir)
    FEASIBILITY STUDY (RESTORATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE ACCESS TO THE NEOSHO RIVER AT JACOBS CREEK-JOHN REDMOND RESERVOIR) 2008 Prepared for Kansas Water Office 901 South Kansas Topeka, KS 66612 Prepared by Watershed Institute, Inc. 1200 SW Executive Dr. Topeka, KS 66615 www.watershedinstitute.biz Cover Page Photo: Neosho River Logjam from Jacobs Landing FEASIBILITY STUDY — NEOSHO RIVER LOGJAM ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION...........................................................................................................2 PROJECT SETTING ...............................................................................................................................2 Neosho River Logjam..........................................................................................................................4 NEOSHO RIVER RESEARCH...............................................................................................................4 Natural and Regulated Flows/Historical Droughts ............................................................................4 High-Flow Frequency/Channel Geometry..........................................................................................5 Geomorphic Effects/Overflow Dams...................................................................................................5 Channel Stability Downstream from John Redmond Dam
    [Show full text]
  • October 2002 Local/ Length Width Persons Damage Location Date Standard (Miles) (Yards) Killed Injured Property Crops Character of Storm
    Time Path Path Number of Estimated October 2002 Local/ Length Width Persons Damage Location Date Standard (Miles) (Yards) Killed Injured Property Crops Character of Storm OKLAHOMA, Western, Central and Southeast Alfalfa County 2 S Cherokee02 1135CST 0 0 Thunderstorm Wind (G52) Grant County Pond Creek02 1730CST 0 0 Hail(0.75) Garfield County 1 W Kremlin02 1745CST 0 0 20K Thunderstorm Wind Severe straight-line winds downed several large tree limbs and blew a boat and trailer about 100 yards. In addition, several house windows were broken; a cattle feeder was blown onto a nearby road; numerous wooden fences were blown over, and the westward-facing wall of a storage shed was pushed in three to five inches. Kay County Ponca City02 1835CST 0 0 Hail(0.88) Hail was reported on the northwest side of the city. Alfalfa County 1 N Cherokee03 0000CST 0 0 60K Flash Flood Four homes received minor damage from high water. Two vehicles were pulled out of high water, and State Highway 8 was closed due to high water. Woodward County 2 SW Mutual03 0200CST 0 0 20K Flash Flood 0800CST A paved road was washed away. Alfalfa County 2 SE Helena03 0300CST 0 0 0 Flash Flood State Highway 45 was closed due to high water. OKZ005-007>008- Woods - Grant - Kay - Woodward - Major - Dewey - Blaine - Kingfisher 010>011-015-017>018 03 0700CST 0 0 25K Flood 06 1430CST Two days of periodic heavy rain fell across much of northwest Oklahoma with some areas receiving nearly seven inches. Large amounts of runoff caused many rivers to rise above flood stage, including the Salt Fork Arkansas River at Tonkawa, the Chikaskia River near Braman and Blackwell, the Cimarron River near Waynoka, Okeene, and Dover, and the North Canadian River near Seiling.
    [Show full text]
  • South-Central Kansas (Homeland Security Region G) Multi-Hazard, Multi-Jurisdictional Mitigation Plan
    South-Central Kansas (Homeland Security Region G) Multi-Hazard, Multi-Jurisdictional Mitigation Plan Prepared For and Developed With the Jurisdictions Within and Including: Butler County, Cowley County, Harper County, Harvey County, Kingman County, Marion County, McPherson County, Reno County, Rice County , Sedgwick County and Sumner County December, 2013 Prepared By: Blue Umbrella TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................. i LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................. v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... Executive-1 HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING COMMITTEE .....................................................Hazard-1 RESOLUTIONS OF ADOPTION .............................................................................. Resolutions-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE PLANNING PROCESS .................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Background .......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 .......................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Hazard Mitigation Planning Process ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PERFORMANCE AUDIT REPORT 100-Hour Audit Plumb Thicket
    PERFORMANCE AUDIT REPORT 100-Hour Audit Plumb Thicket Landfill Application: Determining Whether KDHE’s Review Complied with Applicable Laws and Regulations A Report to the Legislative Post Audit Committee By the Legislative Division of Post Audit State of Kansas June 2004 04-18 Legislative Post Audit Committee Legislative Division of Post Audit THE LEGISLATIVE POST Audit Committee and tors or committees should make their requests its audit agency, the Legislative Division of Post for performance audits through the Chairman or Audit, are the audit arm of Kansas government. any other member of the Committee. Copies of The programs and activities of State government all completed performance audits are available now cost about $9 billion a year. As legislators from the Division’s office. and administrators try increasingly to allocate tax dollars effectively and make government work more efficiently, they need information to evalu- ate the work of governmental agencies. The LEGISLATIVE POST AUDIT COMMITTEE audit work performed by Legislative Post Audit helps provide that information. Senator Derek Schmidt, Chair Senator Bill Bunten We conduct our audit work in accor- Senator Anthony Hensley dance with applicable government auditing stan- Senator Dave Kerr dards set forth by the U.S. General Accounting Senator Chris Steineger Office. These standards pertain to the auditor’s professional qualifications, the quality of the au- Representative John Edmonds, Vice-Chair dit work, and the characteristics of professional Representative Tom Burroughs and meaningful reports. The standards also Representative Bill McCreary have been endorsed by the American Institute Representative Frank Miller of Certified Public Accountants and adopted by Representative Dan Thimesch the Legislative Post Audit Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • CHECK out OTHER FISHING INFORMATION at OUR WEBSITE: Kansas Fishing: We’Ve Come a Long Way, Baby!
    Details Back Cover CHECK OUT OTHER FISHING INFORMATION AT OUR WEBSITE: www.kdwp.state.ks.us Kansas fishing: We’ve come a long way, baby! hat's right. Kansas fishing isn't what it used to be. It's much more. Oh, we still have some of the best channel, Tflathead, and blue catfishing to be found, but today Kansas anglers have great variety. If you're an old-school angler and still want to catch the whiskered fish native to our streams and rivers, you have more opportunities today than ever. Channel catfish are found in nearly every stream, river, pond, lake, and reservoir in the state. They remain one of the most popular angling species. To keep up with demand, state fish hatcheries produce mil- lions of channel cats each year. Some are stocked into lakes as fry, but more are fed and grown to catchable size, then stocked into one of many state and community lakes around the state. Our reservoirs hold amazing numbers of channel catfish, and for the most part, the reservoir cats are overlooked by anglers fishing for other species. Fisheries biologists consider channel cats an underutilized resource in most large reservoirs. For sheer excitement, the flathead catfish is still king. Monster flatheads weighing 60, 70 and even 80 pounds are caught each owned, but some reaches are leased by the department through summer. Most of the truly large flatheads come from the larger the Fishing Impoundments and Stream Habitats (F.I.S.H) rivers in the eastern half of the state, where setting limb and trot Program, while other reaches are in public ownership.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Influencing Community Structure of Riverine
    FACTORS INFLUENCING COMMUNITY STRUCTURE OF RIVERINE ORGANISMS: IMPLICATIONS FOR IMPERILED SPECIES MANAGEMENT by David S. Ruppel, M.S. A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Council of Texas State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy with a Major in Aquatic Resources and Integrative Biology May 2019 Committee Members: Timothy H. Bonner, Chair Noland H. Martin Joseph A. Veech Kenneth G. Ostrand James A. Stoeckel COPYRIGHT by David S. Ruppel 2019 FAIR USE AND AUTHOR’S PERMISSION STATEMENT Fair Use This work is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, section 107). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgement. Use of this material for financial gain without the author’s express written permission is not allowed. Duplication Permission As the copyright holder of this work I, David S. Ruppel, authorize duplication of this work, in whole or in part, for educational or scholarly purposes only. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I thank my major advisor, Timothy H. Bonner, who has been a great mentor throughout my time at Texas State University. He has passed along his vast knowledge and has provided exceptional professional guidance and support with will benefit me immensely as I continue to pursue an academic career. I also thank my committee members Dr. Noland H. Martin, Dr. Joseph A. Veech, Dr. Kenneth G. Ostrand, and Dr. James A. Stoeckel who provided great comments on my dissertation and have helped in shaping manuscripts that will be produced in the future from each one of my chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1951 Kansas - Missouri Floods
    The 1951 Kansas - Missouri Floods ... Have We Forgotten? Introduction - This report was originally written as NWS Technical Attachment 81-11 in 1981, the thirtieth anniversary of this devastating flood. The co-authors of the original report were Robert Cox, Ernest Kary, Lee Larson, Billy Olsen, and Craig Warren, all hydrologists at the Missouri Basin River Forecast Center at that time. Although most of the original report remains accurate today, Robert Cox has updated portions of the report in light of occurrences over the past twenty years. Comparisons of the 1951 flood to the events of 1993 as well as many other parenthetic remarks are examples of these revisions. The Storms of 1951 - Fifty years ago, the stage was being set for one of the greatest natural disasters ever to hit the Midwest. May, June and July of 1951 saw record rainfalls over most of Kansas and Missouri, resulting in record flooding on the Kansas, Osage, Neosho, Verdigris and Missouri Rivers. Twenty-eight lives were lost and damage totaled nearly 1 billion dollars. (Please note that monetary damages mentioned in this report are in 1951 dollars, unless otherwise stated. 1951 dollars can be equated to 2001 dollars using a factor of 6.83. The total damage would be $6.4 billion today.) More than 150 communities were devastated by the floods including two state capitals, Topeka and Jefferson City, as well as both Kansas Cities. Most of Kansas and Missouri as well as large portions of Nebraska and Oklahoma had monthly precipitation totaling 200 percent of normal in May, 300 percent in June, and 400 percent in July of 1951.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Biological Report Neosho Mucket (Lampsilis Rafinesqueana)
    Species Biological Report Neosho Mucket (Lampsilis rafinesqueana) Cover photo: Dr. Chris Barnhart (Missouri State University) Prepared by: The Neosho Mucket Recovery Team This species biological report informs the Draft Recovery Plan for the Neosho Mucket (Lampsilis rafinesqueana) (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2017). The Species Biological Report is a comprehensive biological status review by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for the Neosho Mucket and provides an account of species overall viability. A Recovery Implementation Strategy, which provides the expanded narrative for the recovery activities and the implementation schedule, is available at https://www.fws.gov/arkansas-es/. The Recovery Implementation Strategy and Species Biological Report are finalized separately from the Recovery Plan and will be updated on a routine basis. Executive Summary The Neosho Mucket is a freshwater mussel endemic to the Illinois, Neosho, and Verdigris River basins in Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma. It is associated with shallow riffles and runs comprising gravel substrate and moderate to swift currents, but prefers near-shore areas or areas out of the main current in Shoal Creek and Illinois River. It does not occur in reservoirs lacking riverine characteristics. The life-history traits and habitat requirements of the Neosho Mucket make it extremely susceptible to environmental change (e.g., droughts, sedimentation, chemical contaminants). Mechanisms leading to the decline of Neosho Mucket range from local (e.g., riparian clearing, chemical contaminants, etc.), to regional influences (e.g., altered flow regimes, channelization, etc.), to global climate change. The synergistic (interaction of two or more components) effects of threats are often complex in aquatic environments, making it difficult to predict changes in mussel and fish host(s) distribution, abundance, and habitat availability that may result from these effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Prices Subject to Vge/ an Evaluation of the Suitability of Erts Data for the Purposes of Petroleum Exploration
    .TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 4. Title and S otitle . eport Dote An Evaluation of the Suitability of ERTS June 1974 Data for the Purpose of Petroleum Exploration 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(sl 8. Performing Organization Report No. See Front Cover 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Eason Oil Company 5225 Shartel Avenue 11. Contract or Grant No. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73118 NAS5-21735 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Type III Final Goddard Space Flight Center Report Greenbelt, Maryland 20771 Jan,1973 - Jan.1974 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes ERTS Experiment No. NASA #173 16. Abstract ERTS-1 data give exploration geologists a new pers- pective for looking at the earth. The data are excellent for interpreting regional lithologic and structural relat- ionships and quickly directing attention to areas of greatest exploration interest. Information derived from ERTS data useful for petroleum exploration include: linear features, general lithologic distribution, identification of various anomalous features, some details of structures con- trolling hydrocarbon accumulation, overall structural relationships, and the regional context of the exploration province. Many anomalies (particularly geomor- phic anomalies) correlate with known features of petroleum exploration interest. Linears interpreted from the imagery that were checked in the field correlate with fractures. Bands 5 and 7 and color composite imagery acquired during periods of maximum and minimum vegetation vigor are best for geologic interpretation. Preliminary analysis indicates that use of ERTS imagery can substantially reduce the cost of petroleum exploration in relatively unexplored areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Drought of Water Year 2006 Compared with Four Major Drought Periods of the 20Th Century in Oklahoma
    Prepared in cooperation with the Oklahoma Water Resources Board Hydrologic Drought of Water Year 2006 Compared with Four Major Drought Periods of the 20th Century in Oklahoma • .... Canadian River near Norman February 1952 -,. Canadian River downstream from State Highway. 99" or' near Ada August 16, 2006.. Scientific Investigations Report 2008-5199 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front Cover: Picture One shows wind ripples and river silts, Canadian River near Norman, Cleveland County, Okla- homa, taken February 1952. Photographer: W.B. Hamilton, from U.S. Geological Survey Photographic Library. Picture Two shows the dry Canadian River near Ada, Pontotoc County, Oklahoma, downstream from State High- way 99, taken August 16, 2006. Photographer: Daniel Fenner, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Hydrologic Drought of Water Year 2006 Compared with Four Major Drought Periods Of the 20th Century in Oklahoma By Robert L. Tortorelli Prepared in cooperation with the Oklahoma Water Resources Board Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5199 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 This and other USGS information products are available at: http://store.usgs.gov/ U.S. Geological Survey Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 To learn about the USGS and its information products visit http://www.usgs.gov/ 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
    [Show full text]