22 3 239 254 Kastrygina Kovblyuk for Inet.P65
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Arthropoda Selecta 22(3): 239254 © ARTHROPODA SELECTA, 2013 A review of the spider genus Thanatus C.L. Koch, 1837 in Crimea (Aranei: Philodromidae) Oáçîð ïàóêîâ ðîäà Thanatus C.L. Koch, 1837 Êðûìà (Aranei: Philodromidae) Zoya A. Kastrygina, Mykola M. Kovblyuk Ç.À. Êàñòðûãèíà, Í.Ì. Êîâáëþê Zoology Department, V.I. Vernadsky Taurida National University, Yaltinskaya Street 4, Simferopol 95007, Ukraine. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Êàôåäðà çîîëîãèè, Òàâðè÷åñêèé íàöèîíàëüíûé óíèâåðñèòåò èì. Â.È. Âåðíàäñêîãî, óë. ßëòèíñêàÿ 4, Ñèìôåðîïîëü 95007, Óêðàèíà. KEY WORDS: spiders, Thanatus, Crimea, key to species, annotated checklist. ÊËÞ×ÅÂÛÅ ÑËÎÂÀ: ïàóêè, Thanatus, Êðûì, îïðåäåëèòåëüíûé êëþ÷, àííîòèðîâàííûé ñïèñîê. ABSTRACT. Nine Thanatus species are recorded Walckenaer, 1826 [Platnick, 2013]. In the world fauna from Crimea: T. arenarius L. Koch, 1872; T. atratus (except Australia and New Zealand), the genus con- Simon, 1875; T. formicinus (Clerck, 1757); T. imbecil- tains 96 species, of which the majority are known from lus L. Koch, 1878; T. mongolicus (Schenkel, 1936); T. the Holarctic Region [Platnick, 2013]. Overall, the ge- oblongiusculus (Lucas, 1846); T. pictus L. Koch, 1881; nus remains poorly studied, with more than a half of T. striatus C. L. Koch, 1845 and T. vulgaris Simon, the described species (c. 50) being known from a sin- 1870. T. mongolicus is recorded from Crimea and gle sex and/or the type locality only [Platnick, 2013]. Ukraine for the first time; three other species (T. oblon- The genus has been revised or surveyed within the giusculus, T. pictus and T. striatus) are recorded from scope of the faunas of North America (8 species) [Don- Crimea for the first time. The record of T. mongolicus dale & Redner, 1978], Sweden (5 species) [Almquist, from Crimea lies at the westernmost limit of species 2006], Hungary (6 species) [Szita & Samu, 2000], range. The earlier record of T. coloradensis from Crimea Israel (7 species) [Levy, 1977, 1991, 1999], the United was based on misidentification and actually belongs to Arab Emirates (5 species) [Logunov, 2011], Turkey (8 T. formicinus. An identification key, diagnostic draw- species) [Logunov & Kunt, 2010], Azerbaijan (7 spe- ings, distributional maps, spatial distribution in Crimea cies) [Logunov & Huseynov, 2008], Middle Asia (10 and phenology are provided for all species. species) [Lyakhov, 2000], Siberia (19 species) [Lo- gunov, 1996], China (9 species) [Song et al., 1999] ÐÅÇÞÌÅ.  Êðûìó çàðåãèñòðèðîâàíû 9 âèäîâ and Japan (5 species) [Ono & Ban, 2009]. ðîäà Thanatus: T. arenarius L. Koch, 1872; T. atratus The first Thanatus species from Crimea T. vulgaris Simon, 1875; T. formicinus (Clerck, 1757); T. imbecillus Simon, 1870 was reported by S.A. Spassky in 1927. L. Koch, 1878; T. mongolicus (Schenkel, 1936); T. Many years later, Kovblyuk with the co-authors [Kovbly- oblongiusculus (Lucas, 1846); T. pictus L. Koch, 1881; T. uk, 2004a, 2007, 2013; Kovblyuk et al., 2008a,b; etc.] striatus C. L. Koch, 1845 è T. vulgaris Simon, 1870. T. recorded five additional species: viz., T. arenarius L. mongolicus îáíàðóæåí âïåðâûå â Êðûìó è íà Óêðàèíå; Koch, 1872; T. atratus Simon, 1875; T. coloradensis òðè äðóãèõ âèäà (T. oblongiusculus, T. pictus è T. stria- Keyserling, 1880; T. formicinus (Clerck, 1757) and T. tus) âïåðâûå â Êðûìó. Íàõîäêà T. mongolicus â imbecillus L. Koch, 1878. Of them, the record of T. Êðûìó ñàìàÿ çàïàäíàÿ äëÿ ýòîãî âèäà. Óñòàíîâëå- coloradensis [Kovblyuk, 2007] was proven to be a misi- íî, ÷òî ðàííåå óêàçàíèå T. coloradensis èç Êðûìà îñ- dentification and should actually be referred to T. formici- íîâàíî íà îøèáî÷íîì îïðåäåëåíèè è íà ñàìîì äåëå nus (the pertinent material has been re-examined). Thus, îòíîñèòñÿ ê T. formicinus. Äëÿ âñåõ âèäîâ ïðèâîäÿò- only five species have been reported from Crimea to date. ñÿ îïðåäåëèòåëüíûé êëþ÷, äèàãíîñòè÷åñêèå ðèñóí- While sorting out the spider material collected from êè, êàðòû ðàñïðîñòðàíåíèÿ, ëàíäøàôòíî-áèîòîïè- Crimea during the last few years, we have identified ÷åñêîå ðàñïðîñòðàíåíèå â Êðûìó è ôåíîëîãèÿ. four additional species. Thus, the main purpose of the present work is to gather both original and literature- Introduction derived data on the Crimean Thanatus and to illustrate all the recorded species. In addition, we have provided Thanatus C.L. Koch, 1837 is the second largest data for their distribution and phenology in Crimea, genus of the family Philodromidae, after Philodromus and an identification key to all Crimean species. 240 Z.A. Kastrygina, M.M. Kovblyuk Material and methods 3 Co visible (Fig. 48) ...................................... T. arenarius Co not visible ................................................................. 4 4 Lateral edge of Ep S-shaped (Fig. 39) ...... T. formicinus Drawings were made under both stereo and com- Lateral edge of Ep different ........................................... 5 pound light microscopes by using a grid method. Epig- 5 Mp posteriorly wider than anteriorly; Ep extremely nar- ynes were illustrated after maceration in KOH 20% row, slit-like (Fig. 45)............................. T. mongolicus water solution. Mp posteriorly as wide as anteriorly; Ep wide.............. 6 The morphological terminology follows Shick 6 Mp narrowed in its central part (Fig. 49); D long (Fig. 52) [1965], Logunov [1996] and Zhita & Samu [2000] ........................................................... T. oblongiusculus with some amendments; the abbreviations used in the Mp pyriform; D short ..................................................... 7 text and figure plates are as follows: A alveolus; Ap 7 Posterior edge of Mp bent ventrad (often like a sharpened anterior guide pocket; C conductor; Co copu- tooth) (Fig. 47)............................................. T. vulgaris latory opening; Cy cymbium; D duct of sper- Posterior edge of Mp not bent (like a transverse plate) ... ...................................................................................... 8 mathecal organ; E embolus; Ep epigynal pocket; 8 Ep wide, epigyne without extra ribs (Fig. 44); spermathe- Fd fertilization duct; L lateral edge of epigynal cae large (Figs 53, 57) ................................... T. atratus pocket; M membranous area; Mp median plate; Ep narrow, lateral edges of Ep with extra ribs (Fig. 50); R receptaculum seminis; RTA retrolateral tibial spermathecae small and strongly separated from each apophysis; S spermatheca; So spermathecal or- other (Fig. 58) ............................................... T. striatus gan; St subtegulum; T tegulum; Ta tegular apophysis; VTA ventral tibial apophysis. In the ma- Species survey terial reported below the name of collector M.M. Kovblyuk is abbreviated as M.K. Thanatus arenarius Thorell, 1872 In the following text we have only provided refer- Figs 5, 9, 20, 26, 36, 48, 54, 64, 7374. ences to the most useful publications, including books and revisions. For a complete set of taxonomic refer- T. a.: Tullgren, 1970: 123, f. 46B, pl. 17, f. 234236 (#$). ences see Platnick [2013]. Species ranges have been T. a.: Logunov, 1996: 171, f. 6, 86-87, 125136 (#$). T. a.: Roberts, 1998: 189, f. (#$). characterized following Gorodkov [1984] and Lo- T. a.: Lyakhov, 2000: 226, f. 14 (#$). gunov & Marusik [2000]. All the specimens treated in T. a.: Szita & Samu, 2000: 161, f. 69, 1617, 4748 (#$). this study are deposited in the collection of Zoology T. a.: Almquist, 2006: 471, f. 402ah (#$). Department, V.I. Vernadsky Taurida National Uni- RECORDS FROM CRIMEA. Kovblyuk [2004a]. versity (TNU), Simferopol, Ukraine (curator: M.M. MATERIAL. UKRAINE. Crimea: Lenino Distr.: 1 $ (TNU), Kovblyuk). Kerch Peninsula, vicinity of Presnovodnaya railway station, Verkhne-Zamorskoe Vil., pitfall traps, 13.06.1997, M.K.; Saky Distr.: 3 $$ (TNU-1624/6, 1626/3, 1628/3), vicinity of Pribrezh- KEY TO THE THANATUS SPECIES FOUND IN CRIMEA naya railway station, saline meadow, pitfall traps, 19.07 17.10.2000, M.K.; 1 $ (TNU-1580/4), same locality, salt-marsh, Males: Salicornia europaea, Halocnemum strobilaceum, pitfall traps, 1 Eye field light, with no colour pattern (Fig. 66) .............. 28.079.08.2000, M.K.; Simferopol Distr.: 1 # (TNU-964/3), ............................................................ T. oblongiusculus vicinity of Lozovoe-3 Vil., western spur of Bayrakly Mt. (519 m), the watershed, ~250 m, dry steppe, pitfall traps, 1426.05.2000, Eye field with a dark pattern (Figs 6165) ................... 2 M.K.; 11 ## (TNU-1786/8, 1787/13, 1788/9, 1789/7), vicinity 2 RTA bifurcated (Figs 56, 910, 26, 3132) ................ 3 of Skvortsovo Vil., steppe, pitfall traps, 27.049.06.2002, M.K.; RTA uniramous (Figs 1116) ........................................ 4 1 #, 1 $ (TNU-1845/8, 1849/2), same locality, forest plantation, 3 RTA fishtail-shaped (Figs 5, 9, 26) ............. T. arenarius pitfall traps, 9.0510.07.2002, M.K.; 3 ## (TNU-1756/10, 1757/ RTA two-armed (beak-shaped) (Figs 6, 10, 3132)......... 12), same locality, steppe with Stipa and Festuca, pitfall traps, ................................................................... T. imbecillus 9.051.06.2002, M.K.; 3 ## (TNU-1856/3, 1857/3), same lo- 4 Embolic base swollen, with a keel (Figs 7, 11, 22, 38) ... cality, steppe, pitfall traps, 9.051.06.2002, M.K.; 1 # (TNU- ....................................................................... T.vulgaris 1838/10/1), same locality, meadow near of canal, pitfall traps, Embolic base not swollen ............................................... 5 30.0610.07.2002,