<<

BIHAREAN BIOLOGIST 10 (1): 4-7 ©Biharean Biologist, Oradea, Romania, 2016 Article No.: e151204 http://biozoojournals.ro/bihbiol/index.html

A study on the fauna of and Kalat Counties in Razavi , (Arachnida: Araneae)

Hussein SADEGHI1, Malihe AHMADI2, Alireza ZAMANI3,* and Isa JABALEH2

1. Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of , Mashhad, Iran. 2. Higher education Institute of Jihad-e Daneshgahi, Branch. 3. Department of Biology, School of Biology and Centre of Excellence in Phylogeny of Living Organisms in Iran, College of Science, University of , Tehran, Iran *Corresponding author, A. Zamani, E-mail: [email protected]

Received: 08. February 2015 / Accepted: 11. May 2015 / Available online: 01. June 2016 / Printed: June 2016

Abstract. In a survey investigating the spider fauna of Dargaz and Kalat counties in of Iran, 13 families and 21 species were recognized, of which three are new to Iran: Minosia simeonica Levy, 1995, Nomisia negebensis Levy, 1995 and atratus Simon, 1875. Also, Minosia Dalmas, 1921 is recorded for the first time in Iran. Data on collection localities and distribution of each species, as well as diagnostic morphological characters and figures for the newly recorded taxa are provided.

Key words: new records, Thanatus, Minosia, Nomisia, Iran.

Introduction

Spiders (Araneae), with over 45000 recognized species in the world (World Spider Catalog 2015). Reviewing the literature, Zamani et al. (2015a) gave a checklist of of Iran with about 540 species. Considering the geographic position of the country as a land bridge joining the Palaearctic, Afro- tropical and Oriental zones, and its diverse climate condi- tions and the known spider fauna of adjacent countries, it seems that this number must be much higher than known at present. Recently, more small faunistic studies have been or- ganized (Marusik et al. 2014, Zamani 2014, Sadeghi et al. 2014, Zamani et al. 2014a,b, Mirshamsi et al. 2015). However, still many parts of the country have not been explored in terms of taxonomic and large scale faunistic surveys. The Figure 1. Map of Iran, showing the collecting sites (Dargaz and Kalat counties) in northeastern part. present study aimed to investigate the spider fauna of Dar- gaz and Kalat regions in bordering areas of Iran and Turk- menistan, where no similar studies have been carried out so far.

Materials and methods

This study was conducted during seasonal growth of 2014, from early July to late October. Specimens were collected mainly inside and surroundings of different agroecosystems. The study areas, Dargaz and Kalat are located in Northeastern Iran, in the bordering areas of Iran and (Figs 1, 2, 3). A variety of collection methods including hand collecting, pitfall trapping and sweeping were used. Specimens were preserved in 70% ethanol and trans- Figure 2. A view of Zo-e derongar, a sampling site ferred to the laboratory. Digital images were captured using a Canon in 55 km west of Dargaz. EOS-1Ds Mark III camera, which was attached to a Nikon SMZ-1000 stereomicroscope. Identification of most specimens was made according to Alm- quist (2006), Levy (1995), Le Peru (2011), Logunov (1996), Nentwig et al. (2015), Prószyn'ski (2003). Global and local distribution data are given according to World Spider Catalog (2015) and Zamani et al. (2015b), respectively. Studied specimens were deposited at the Jalal Afshar Zoological Museum of University of Tehran (JAZM).

Results

A total number of 431 spider specimens were collected, from which only 99 adult specimens were identifiable to the spe- Figure 3. A view of Tiwan, a sampling site in 90 km southwest of Dargaz.

Spider Fauna of Dargaz and Kalat Counties, Iran 5

Figure 4. Habitus of the three newly recorded species, dorsal view. A: Nomisia negebensis Levy, 1995 B: Minosia simeonica Levy, 1995 C: Thanatus atratus Simon, 1875.

Figure 5 Ventral views of epigynes (A, C, E) and dorsal views of vulvae (B, D) of the three newly recorded species. A, B: Minosia simeonica Levy, 1995 C, D: Nomisia negebensis Levy, 1995 E: Thanatus atratus Simon, 1875.

cies level. Overall, 13 families and 21 species were recorded Castianeira arnoldii Charitonov, 1946 and identified: Material examined: 3 ♀♀ (JAZM-IR93-MA20), Ghazan Beig (37°15´52.67"N, 59°18´21.04"E), 1.10.2014 (M. Ahmadi); 1 ♂ Family ARANEIDAE Clerck, 1757 1 ♀ (JAZM-IR93-MA103), Seyyed Abad (37°26´35.55"N, Genus Argiope Audouin, 1826 59°08´06.47"E), 1.9.2014 (M. Ahmadi); 1 ♀ (JAZM-IR93- Argiope bruennichi (Scopoli, 1772) MA15), Ghazan Beig (37°15´52.67"N, 59°18´21.04"E), Material examined: 1 ♀ (JAZM-IR93-MA95), Salamanshahr 1.10.2014 (M. Ahmadi). (36°41′40.92″N, 51°11′43.80″E), 16.8.2014 (M. Ahmadi). Distribution in Iran: Golestan, Razavi Khorasan (new pro- Distribution in Iran: Chahar Mahal & Bakhtiary, Eastern or vincial record). Western Azarbayjan, Fars, Gilan, Golestan, Mazandaran, Global distribution: Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Iran. Qazvin, Razavi Khorasan, Zanjan. Family GNAPHOSIDAE Pocock, 1898 Global distribution: Palaearctic. Genus Gnaphosa Latreille, 1804 Family CORINNIDAE Karsch, 1880 Gnaphosa leporina (C. L. Koch, 1866) Genus Castianeira Keyserling, 1879 Material examined: 1 ♀ (JAZM-IR93-MA11), Ghazan Beig

6 H. Sadeghi et al.

(37°15´52.67"N, 59°18´21.04"E), 1.10.2014 (M. Ahmadi). Distribution in Iran: Razavi Khorasan. Distribution in Iran: Razavi Khorasan. Global distribution: Mediterranean to Central Asia. Global distribution: West Palaearctic. Trochosa terricola Thorell, 1856 Genus Minosia Dalmas, 1921 Material examined: 1 ♂ (JAZM-IR93-MA115), Laeen Minosia simeonica Levy, 1995 (Figs. 4b, 5a, 5b) (37°08´17.93"N, 59°30´14.59"E), 5.10.2014 (M. Ahmadi); 1 ♂ Material examined: 2 ♀♀ (JAZM-IR93-MA64), Nokhandan (JAZM-IR93-MA26), Ghazan Beig (37°15´52.67"N, (37°1´16.85"N, 58°59´2.38"E), 12.10.2014 (M. Ahmadi). 59°18´21.04"E) (M. Ahmadi). Diagnosis: Males are similar to Minosia spinosissima (Simon Distribution in Iran: , Razavi Khorasan (new provin- 1878), from which they can be separated by the form of the cial record). tibial apophysis, which winds slightly beyond cymbium, Global distribution: Holarctic. and by the embolus, which is widened at the distal end. Family Blackwall, 1862 Females are easily distinguishable from all other species of Genus Oecobius Lucas, 1846 the genus by the wrinkled median septum and the small Oecobius nadiae (Spassky, 1936) depression along the epigastric furrow of the epigynum Material examined: 1 ♂ (JAZM-IR93-MA6), Sangbar (Levy 1995). (37°25´53.69"N, 59°0´37.78"E), 12.10.2014 (M. Ahmadi). Distribution in Iran: Razavi Khorasan (new country record). Distribution in Iran: Razavi Khorasan. Global distribution: Israel, Iran (new record). Global distribution: Central Asia, China, Iran. Genus Nomisia Dalmas, 1921 Genus Uroctea Dufour, 1820 Nomisia negebensis Levy, 1995 (Figs. 4a, 5c, 5d) Uroctea limbata (C. L. Koch, 1843) Material examined: 1 ♀ (JAZM-IR93-MA70), Nokhandan Material examined: 2 ♀♀ (JAZM-IR93-MA63), Nokhandan (37°1´16.85"N, 58°59´2.38"E), 12.10.2014 (M. Ahmadi); 2 ♀♀ (37°1´16.85"N, 58°59´2.38"E), 12.10.2014 (M. Ahmadi). (JAZM-IR93-MA40), Gol Khandan (37°29´40.83"N, Distribution in Iran: Razavi Khorasan. 59°09´32.29"E), 1.10.2014 (M. Ahmadi); 1 ♀ (JAZM-IR93-MA Global distribution: West Palaearctic. 24), Ghazan Beig (37°15´52.67"N, 59°18´21.04"E), 1.10.2014 Family Thorell, 1870 (M. Ahmadi). Genus Thanatus C.L. Koch, 1837 Diagnosis: Males of this species are similar to Nomisia ex- Thanatus atratus Simon, 1875 (Figs. 4c, 5e) cerpta (O. P.-Cambridge, 1872), from which they can be dis- Material examined: 1 ♀ (JAZM-IR93-MA101), Seyyed Abad tinguished by the form of sclerites and tibial apophysis. (37°26´35.55"N, 59°08´06.47"E), 1.9.2014 (M. Ahmadi); 1 ♀ Females are similar to N. castanea Dalmas, 1921, but can be (JAZM-IR93-MA143), Golriz (37°28´12.44"N, diagnosed by the shape of the rims bordering the central 59°08´11.99"E), 1.9.2014 (M. Ahmadi). depression of the epigynum (Levy 1995). Diagnosis: This species is closely related to Distribution in Iran: Razavi Khorasan, Iran (new country re- Simon, 1870. Males can be separated by the shape and size cord). of the tegular apophysis and by the shape of the embolus. Global distribution: Turkey, Israel, Iran (new record). Females are distinguished by having narrower and not de- Family LYCOSIDAE Sundevall, 1833 pressed central division of epigyne, and by the shape of the Genus Simon, 1885 bursa copulatrix (Logunov 1996). Hogna radiata (Latreille, 1817) Distribution in Iran: Razavi Khorasan (new country record). Material examined: 2 ♀♀ (JAZM-IR93-MA135), Tivan Global distribution: Palaearctic. (37°25´27.72"N, 58°34´30.92"E), 2.9.2014 (M. Ahmadi). Family PHOLCIDAE C. L. Koch, 1850 Distribution in Iran: Fars, Golestan, Mazandaran, Razavi Genus Artema Walckenaer, 1837 Khorasan, Tehran. Artema transcaspica Spassky, 1934 Global distribution: Central Europe to Central Asia, Central Material examined: 1 ♂ (JAZM-IR93-MA38), Dargaz Africa. (37°26´42.62"N, 59°06´29.52"E), 12.10.2014 (M. Ahmadi). Genus Lycosa Latreille, 1804 Distribution in Iran: Semnan, Razavi Khorasan (new provin- Lycosa singoriensis (Laxmann, 1770) cial record). Material examined: 1 ♂ (JAZM-IR93-MA136), Seyyed Abad Global distribution: Central Asia, Iran. (37°26´35.55"N, 59°08´06.47"E), 1.9.2014 (M. Ahmadi). Family SALTICIDAE Blackwall, 1841 Distribution in Iran: Eastern Azarbayjan, Mazandaran, Sem- Genus Phlegra Simon, 1876 nan, Razavi Khorasan (new provincial record). Phlegra fasciata (Hahn, 1826) Global distribution: West and Central Palaearctic. Material examined: 1 ♀ (JAZM-IR93-MA62), Shamsi Khan Genus Pardosa C.L. Koch, 1847 (37°16´06.44"N, 59°20´05.18"E), 5.10.2014 (M. Ahmadi). Pardosa morosa (C. L. Koch, 1870) Distribution in Iran: Golestan, Mazandaran, Razavi Material examined: 4 ♀♀ (JAZM-IR93-MA145), Tandoreh Khorasan (new provincial record). (37°24´02.02"N, 58°54´04.75"E), 9.9.2014 (M. Ahmadi). Global distribution: Palaearctic. Distribution in Iran: Razavi Khorasan. Genus Plexippus C. L. Koch, 1846 Global distribution: Europe to Central Asia. Plexippus devorans (O. P.-Cambridge, 1872) Genus Trochosa C. L. Koch, 1847 Material examined: 1 ♂ (JAZM-IR93-MA41), Golkhandan Trochosa hispanica Simon, 1870 (37°29´40.83"N, 59°09´32.29"E), 1.10.2014 (M. Ahmadi). Material examined: 1 ♂ 1 ♀ (JAZM-IR93-MA22), Ghazan Beig Distribution in Iran: Golestan, Kerman, Tehran, Razavi (37°15´52.67"N, 59°18´21.04"E), 1.10.2014 (M. Ahmadi). Khorasan (new provincial record).

Spider Fauna of Dargaz and Kalat Counties, Iran 7

Global distribution: Greece to Central Asia. only adults were identified, thus a lot of specimens were left Family SICARIIDAE Keyserling, 1880 unidentified. The problem of determination of immature Genus Loxosceles Heineken & Lowe, 1832 stages of spiders indicates a great need of applying other Loxosceles rufescens (Dufour, 1820) methods of , especially exploring the molecular Material examined: 1 ♀ (JAZM-IR93-MA104), Dargaz techniques. Also, the present study was performed during a (37°26´2.62″N, 59°06´29.5"E), 10.9.2014 (M. Ahmadi). seasonal growth inside and surroundings of agroecosystems, Distribution in Iran: Fars, Hormozgan, Razavi Khorasan, Te- so the results can not represent a complete list of spider hran. fauna of the study areas. A collection schedule that includes Global distribution: Cosmopolitan. a range of day and night-time hours, as well as seasons and Family SPARASSIDAE Bertkau, 1872 even microhabitats would contribute to a more accurate pic- Genus Olios Walckenaer, 1872 ture of spider diversity of the study areas and the country. Olios sericeus (Kroneberg, 1875) Material examined: 1 ♀ (JAZM-IR93-MA125), Kalat (36°59´30.34"N, 59°46´58.72"E), 3.10.2014 (M. Ahmadi); 2 ♀♀ (JAZM-IR93-MA146), Tandoreh (37°24´02.02"N, Acknowledgments. The supports provided by Ferdowsi University of Mashhad and Higher Education Institute of Jihad-e Daneshgahi, 58°54´04.75"E), 9.9.2014 (M. Ahmadi). Kashmar Branch are acknowledged. Also, the authors wish to extend Distribution in Iran: , Razavi Khorasan, Tehran. their sincere gratitude towards Dr. Yuri M. Marusik and Dr. Anton Global distribution: Caucasus, Central Asia, Iran. Nadolny for their invaluable comments on some of the specimens. Family THERIDIIDAE Sundevall, 1833 The third author is thankful toward the National Museum of Natural Genus Steatoda Sundevall, 1833 History and Genetic Resources for providing him with research Steatoda paykulliana (Walckenaer, 1805) supplements. Material examined: 4 ♀♀ (JAZM-IR93-MA14), Ghazan Beig (37°15´52.7"N, 59°18´21.04"E), 1.10.2014 (M. Ahmadi).

Distribution in Iran: Ardebil, Fars, Golestan, Mazandaran, References Razavi Khorasan, Semnan, Tehran. Global distribution: Europe, Mediterranean to Central Asia. Almquist, S. (2006): Swedish Araneae, part 1: families Atypidae to Hahniidae Family Lehtinen, 1967 (Linyphiidae excluded). Insect Systematics and Evolution Supplement 62: 1- 284. Genus Nurscia Simon, 1874 Le Peru, B. (2011): The spiders of Europe, a synthesis of data: Volume 1 Nurscia albomaculata (Lucas, 1846) Atypidae to Theridiidae. Mémoires de la Société Linnéenne de Lyon 2: 1-522. Material examined: 1 ♀ (JAZM-IR93-MA139), Kor Cheshmeh Levy, G. (1995): Revision of the spider subfamily Gnaphosinae in Israel (Araneae: Gnaphosidae). Journal of Natural History 29: 919-981. (37°27´48.17"N, 59°07´08.07"E), 31.8.2014 (M. Ahmadi). Logunov, D.V. (1996): A critical review of the spider genera Apollophanes O. P.- Distribution in Iran: Razavi Khorasan, Tehran. Cambridge, 1898 and Thanatus C. L. Koch, 1837 in North Asia (Araneae, Global distribution: Europe, Egypt to Central Asia. Philodromidae). Revue Arachnologique 11: 133-202. Family ZODARIIDAE Thorell, 1881 Marusik, Y.M., Zamani, A. Mirshamsi, O. (2014): Three new species of mygalomorph and filistatid spiders from Iran (Araneae, Cyrtaucheniidae, Genus Parazodarion Ovtchinnikov, Ahmad & Gurko, 2009 Nemesiidae and Filistatidae). ZooKeys 463: 1-10. Parazodarion raddei (Simon, 1889) Mirshamsi, O., Saneei, S., Aliabadian, M., Ghassemzadeh, F. (2015): New Material examined: 1 ♀ (JAZM-IR93-MA7), Sangbar faunistic records of Lycosidae (Arachnida, Aranei) from Iran. Arthropoda Selecta 24: 99-106. (37°25´53.69"N, 59°0´37.78"E), 12.10.2014 (M. Ahmadi). Nentwig, W., Blick.T., Gloor, D., Hänggi, A., Kropf, C. (2015): Spiders of Distribution in Iran: , Razavi Khorasan, Western Azar- Europe. < www.araneae.unibe.ch>, accessed at 2015.01.14. bayjan, . Otto, S. (2014): Caucasian Spiders: a faunistic database on the spiders of the Caucasus. Version 1.4. , accessed at Global distribution: Iran, Tajikistan, Pakistan. 2014.12.20. Prószyn'ski, J. (2003): Salticidae (Araneae) of the Levant. Annales zoologici, Warszawa 53: 1-180. Discussion Sadeghi, H. Kaykhosravi, M. Zamani, A. (2014): New data and records of spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) from Northeastern Iran. Serket 14(2): 105-110. World Spider Catalog (2015). World Spider Catalog. Natural History Museum Recent studies have shown that the spider fauna of Iran is Bern < http://wsc.nmbe.ch>, version 16, accessed at 2015.01.15. far from being completely known, as there has been much Zamani, A. (2014): The spitting spider genus Scytodes (Araneae: Scytodidae) in Iran. Arachnologische Mitteilungen 47: 41-44. information accumulated during the recent years. This ar- Zamani, A., Mirshamsi, O., Marusik, Y.M., Moradmand, M. (2015a): The gument is supported when Iran is compared with its Checklist of the Spiders of Iran. Version 2015 , accessed at neighboring countries that are located in similar geographic 2015.01.20. Zamani, A., Mirshamsi, O., Jannesar, B., Marusik, Y.M., Esyunin, S.L. (2015b): areas. For example, spider fauna of Azerbaijan, which its New data on the spider fauna of Iran (Arachnida: Araneae), Part II. Zoology area is much smaller than that of Iran (86,600 km2 vs. & Ecology 25(4): 339-346. 1,648,195 km2) is comprised of 714 species (Otto 2014). Zamani A, Nikmagham Z, Allahdadi M, Ghassemzadeh F, Mirshamsi O. (2014): Although the results of this study added one new genus New data on the spider fauna of Iran (Arachnida: Araneae). Zoology in the Middle East 60(4): 362–367. and three new species to the Iranian fauna and nine species to the fauna of the province, the total number of spider spe- cies presented here was less than it was expected. As an ex- planation, more than half of the collected specimens were immature. Because of the difficulty of identifying juveniles,