DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/80325 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Kim, C.Y. Title: The modern transformation of Korean political thinking : revisiting the political ideas of the Late-Nineteenth-Century Reformists Issue Date: 2019-11-14 Bibliography Primary Sources Confucian Classics Shujing (苗篏, Book of History) Lunyu (緰蓳, Analects of Confucius) Mengzi (耺螲, Works of Mencius) Daxue (繗谷, Great Learning) Zhongyong (襦虉, Doctrine of The Mean) Annals Chosŏn wangjo sillok (裧茗蘌裧葒罵, The Annals of the Chosŏn Dynasty) (http://sillok.history.go.kr/main/main.jsp) Kojong sillok (簙褒葒罵, The Annals of the Era of King Kojong) (http://sillok.history.go.kr/inspection/inspection.jsp?mTree=0&id=kza) Newspapers and Journals Hansŏng sunbo (豀茱菝膊, Hansŏng ten-day newspaper) · Hansŏng chubo (豀茱襋膊, Hansŏng weekly newspaper) (CD Rom) (Seoul: Tongbang midiŏ, 2003). Tongnip sinmun (☛Ⱃ㔶ⶎ, The Independent, 1896-1899) (Seoul: LG sangnam ŏllon chaedan, 2004). Taechosŏn tongnip hyŏphoe hoebo (о࣏۴ ѧվ୆ୣ ୣؿ The Bulletin of the Independence Club of Great Korea). No. 1–17 (November 30th 1896 – July 31st 1897). Diary Yun Chi-Ho Ilgi (Yun Ch’iho’s Diary) vol. 1-6. Ed. by Kuksa P’yŏnch’an wiwŏnhoe (Seoul: T’amgudang, 1974). Other Primary Sources An Chŏngbok. “Ch’ŏnhak mundap” (詏谷肪繆, Questions and Answers on the Heavenly Studies) In Kukyŏk Sun’amjip 3 (Seoul: minjok munhwa ch’ujinhoe, 1996): 227–51. Ch’oe Hanki. Chigu chŏnyo (襽粺術蘶S Summary of the Works on the Earth, 1857). vol. 1–6. Chŏng Kyo. Taehan kye’nyŏnsa (繗豈篠総艋, The History of the Last Years of the Great Empire of Korea). Trans. by Kim Uch’ŏl et al. (Seoul: So’myŏng, 2004). Chŏng Yak’yong. Kukyŏk Tasan simunjip (糑蔮 縙芄营肫觛, The Poems and Essays of Tasan Chŏng Yak’yong) vol. 1–9. Trans. and Ed. by Minjok munhwa Ch’ujinhoe (Seoul: Sol, 1986). __________. Kukyŏk Yŏ’yudang chŏnsŏ (糑蔮 蔛蛫繊衒苗, The Complete Works of Chŏng Yak’yong) Trans. by Chŏnju taehakkyo ho’namhak yŏnguso (Seoul: Yŏgang ch’ulp’ansa, 1986). Denny, Own N. China and Korea (Shanghai: Kelly and Walsh Limited Printers, 1888). Fukuzawa Yukichi (膟譻蛺綋). 膟譻蛺綋蠭蟇觛 vol. 1: 苣蓜艃袘;vol.4: 肫聒罸襺筑缉 (Tokyo: 箻蜴蝂菎繗谷諨讫奁, 2004). Hŏ Mok. Kuk’yŏk Kiŏn (糑蔮 絽蔀) vol. 1-8 (Seoul: Minjok munhwa ch’ujinhoe, 2006). Hong Daeyong. Kukyŏk Tamhŏnsŏ (糑蔮 縹貘苗) (Seoul: Minjok munhwa ch’ujinhoe, 1974). __________. Imha kyŏng’ryun / Ŭisan mundap (螞谨篏羷/蝉芄肪繆, Thinking in Forest about Governing the World / Dialogue at Mt. Yuwulu). Trans. by Cho ilmun (Seoul: Kŏnguk taehakkyo ch’ulp’anbu, 2006). Huang Zunxian (赣襢貕), Chosŏn ch’aeknyak (裧茗訷缉, Strategy on Chosŏn). Trans. by Cho Ilmun (Seoul: Kŏnkuk taehak’kyo ch’ulp’anbu, 2001). Hwang Hyŏn. Maech’ŏn yarok (耭詒蓄罵). Trans. by Im Hyŏngt’aek et al. (Seoul: Munhak kwa chisŏng sa, 2005). Kim Ok’kyun. Kapsin illok (第葂螔罵). Trans. by Cho Ilmun (Seoul: Kŏnkuk taehakkyo ch’ulp’anbu, 1993). __________. Kim Okkyun chŏnjip (綎藛紒衒觛, The Complete Works of Kim Ok’kyun). Ed.by Han’gukhak munhŏn yŏn’guso (Seoul: Asea munhwasa, 1979). Kim Wŏnmo (Ed. and Trans.). “Kyŏnmi sajŏl Hong Yŏngsik pokmyŏng mundapgi” (㐵⨾౑⠇ ὥⱥ᳜᚟࿨ၥ⟅グ) (The First Korean Embassy, Vice-minister Hong Yŏngsik’s Report on the United States in 1883). Sahakji. 15 (1981). Mutsu Munemitsu. Kenkenroku (筽筽罵). Trans. by Kim Sŭng’il (Seoul: Pŏm’usa, 1993). Pak Chega. Pukhakŭi (臦谷蝈, Discussions of Northern Studies). Trans. by An Taehoe (Paju: Tolbaegye, 2003). Pak Chiwŏn. Yŏn’amjip (蕋蒓觛, The Works of Yŏn’am Pak Chiwŏn). Trans. by Sin Hoyŏl and Kim Myŏngho (Seoul: Tolbaegye, 2007) __________. Yŏlha ilgi (蕣谮螔絽, Daily Accounts of the Travel to Yŏlha). Trans. by Kim Hyŏljo (Paju: Tolbaegye, 2009). Pak Sedang. Kukyŏk Sabyŏnrok (糑蔮 艙腰罵, Accounts what was Thought of and Discerned) (Seoul: Minjok munhwa ch’ujin hoe, 1982). __________. Kukyŏk Sŏgyejip (糑蔮 苣篧觛, Corpus of Sŏgye Pak Sedang) vol. 1–4 (Seoul: Han’guk kojŏn pŏn’nyŏkwŏn, 2006–). Pak Yŏnghyo. “Pak Yŏnghyo ŭi kŏnbaeksŏ – naechŏng kaehyŏk e kwanhan 1888 yŏn ŭi sangsomun” (Pak Yŏnghyo’s memorial – the 1888 memorial on national reform). Trans. by Kim Kapch’ŏn. Han’guk chŏngchi yŏn’gu. 2 (1990). Song Siyŏl. Songja daejŏn ((糑蔮) 莁螲繗衒, The Complete Works of Song Siyŏl). Ed. by Minjok munhwa ch’ujinhoe (Seoul: Minjok munhwa ch’ujinhoe, 1980–88). Yi Hwang. T’oegyejip ((糑蔮) 讍篧觛, The Works of T’oegye Yi Hwang). Trans. by Minjok munhwa ch’ujinhoe (Seoul: Minjok munhwa ch’ujinhoe, 1977). _________. T’oegye sŏnjip (䑊Ἒ㍶㰧, Selected Works of T’oegye Yi Hwang). Trans. by Yun Sasun (Seoul: Hyŏn’amsa, 1993). Yi I. Sŏnghak jip’yo (茾谷觙蘶, A Digest of the Sages’ Study). Trans. by Kim T’aewan (Seoul: Ch’ŏng’ŏram midiŏ, 2007). Yi Ik. Sŏngho sasŏl (茷賲艊茢, Miscellaneous Accounts of Sŏngho Yi Ik). Trans. by Ch’oe Sŏkki (Seoul: Han’gilsa, 1999). _________. Kukyŏk Sŏngho jilsŏ (糑蔮 茷賲觋苗). Trans by An Pyŏnghak, Yi Naejong, Yi Ut’ae, et al. (Seoul: Hallym taehakkyo t’aedong kojŏn yŏn’guso, 1998). Yi Kwangsu. “Pak Yŏnghyo ssi rŭl mannan iyagi” (The Story of Meeting with Mr. Pak Yŏnghyo) In Yi kwangsu chŏnjip 17 (Seoul: Samjungdang, 1962): 400–05. Yi Sŭngman (Syngman Rhee). Tongnip chŏngsin (☛Ⱃ㩫㔶, The Spirit of National Independence) (Seoul: Chŏngdong ch’ulp’an sa, 1993). Yu Kilchun. Yu Kilchun chŏnsŏ (蛏綋襜 衒苗, The Complete Works of Yu Kilchun). Ed. by Yu Kilchun chŏnsŏ p’yŏnch’an wiwŏnhoe (Seoul: Iljogak, 1971). Yu Hyŏngwŏn. Pangye surok ((糑蔮襆豻) 能篧菆罵, Miscellaneous Account of Pangye Yu Hyŏngwŏn). Trans. by Han Changkyŏng (Ch’ungnam taehak’kyo ch’ulp’anbu, 1962). Yun Hyu. Paekho chŏnsŏ vol. 1–12 (糑蔮 腅賲衒苗, The Complete Works of Paekho Yun Hyu). Trans. by Yang Hongnyŏl, Im Chŏnggi, O Kyu’kŭn et al. (Seoul: Minjok munhwa ch’ujinhoe, 1996–). Zheng Guanying. Sŏngsewiŏn: nanse rŭl hyanghan koŏn (Shengshi weiyan: candid advice for a disorderly time) Trans. by Yi Hwasŭng (Seoul: Ch’aeksesang, 2003). Secondary Sources Alexander, Jeffrey C. and Piotr Sztompka (Eds), Rethinking Progress: Movements, Forces, and Ideas at the End of the 20th Century (Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1990). Alexander, Jeffrey C. Fin de Siècle Social Theory (London and New York: Verso, 1995). Almond, Gabriel and G. Bingham Powell. Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach (Boston, U.S.: Little, Brown, 1966). An Oesun. “Chosŏn esŏŭi minjujuŭi suyongron ŭi ch’u’i: Ch’oe Hangi esŏ Tongnip hyŏphoe kkaji” (The Trends of the Acceptance of Democracy in Chosŏn Korea: From Ch’oe Hangi to the Independence Club). Sahoe kwahak yŏn’gu. 9 (2000): 38–65. _________. “19 segi mal Chosŏn e itsŏsŏ minjujŭi suyong ron ŭi chaegŏmt’o: tongsŏ sasang yunghap ŭi kwanjŏm esŏ” (Revisiting the Introduction of Democracy in Late-Nineteenth-Century Chosŏn: From the Perspective of the Confluence of both Eastern and Western Thoughts). Chŏngch’i sasang yŏn’gu. 4 (2001): 27–53. _________. “Tasan Chŏng Yakyong ŭi chŏngch’i kwŏllyŏkron ŭi sŏngkyŏk” (The Characteristics of Chŏng Yakyong’s Ideas of Political Power). Tongbanghak. 7 (2001): 59–95. An Pyŏng’gŏl, Kim Kyobin, Ch’oe Sŏkgi, et al. Chosŏn hugi kyŏnghak ŭi chŏngae wa kŭ sŏngkyŏk (Interpretations of Confucian Texts in Late Chosŏn and Their Characteristics) (Seoul: Sŏngkyun’gwan taehak’kyo ch’ulp’anbu, 1998). Aoki Koichi (誃職簲螐). Fukuzawa Yukichi no Azia (膟譻蛺綋റ൘൮൘ Fukuzawa Yukichi and Asia) (箻蜴蝂菎繗谷諨讫赬, 2011). Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition (The University of Chicago Press, 1998). Bendix, Reinhard. “Tradition and Modernity Reconsidered”. Comparative Studies in Society and History. 9(3) (1967): 292–346. Blumenberg, Hans. The Legitimacy of the Modern Age. Trans. Robert M. Wallace (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1983). Bowler, Peter. The Invention of Progress: The Victorians and the Past (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989). Calinescu, Matei. “The Idea of Modernity” In Faces of Modernity (Duke University Press, 1977): 11– 92. Cassirer, Ernst. The Philosophy of the Enlightenment. Trans. Fritz C.A. Koelin and James P. Pettegrove (Princeton University Press, 1979). Chandra, Vipan. Imperialism, resistance, and reform in late nineteenth-century Korea: enlightenment and the Independence Club (Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California Press, 1988). Chang, Hao. Liang Ch’i-ch’ao and Intellectual Transition in China, 1890-1907 (Harvard University Press, 1971). __________. Chinese Intellectuals in Crisis: Search for Order and Meaning (1890–1911) (Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1987). Chang Insŏng. “Ch’eje haech’egi ŭi kaehyŏk sasang” (The Reform Thoughts in the Era of the Collapse of the Old Regime) In Kang Kwangsik et al. Chosŏn sidae kaehyŏk sasang yŏn’gu. (Sŏngnam: Han’guk chŏngsin munhwa yŏn’guso, 1998). __________. “Yu Kilchun e natanan todŏk kwa chŏngch’i” (Yu Kilchun’s Moral and Political Identity: How to Read His Text). Segye chŏngch’i. 23(1) (1999): 58–102. __________. Changso ŭi kukje chŏngch’i sasang: tong’asia chilsŏ pyŏndonggi ŭi Yokoi Shonan kwa Kim Yunsik (The Political Thought of Topos: Yokoi Shonan and Kim Yunsik in the Period of the Transformation of the East Asian World Order) (Seoul: Sŏul taehakgyo ch’ulp’anbu, 2002). Chang Myŏnghak. “Kŭndae chŏk kongnonjang ŭi tŭngjang kwa chŏngch’i kwŏllyŏk ŭi pyŏnhwa: Tongnip sinmun sasŏl rŭl chungsim ŭlo” (The Emergence of Modern Public Sphere and the Shift in Political Power). Han’guk chŏngch’i yŏn’gu. 16(2) (2007): 27–53. Chi Duhwan. “Chosŏn huki yesong yŏn’gu” (A Study of the Disputes over Ritual Propriety in Late Chosŏn). Pudae sahak. 11 (1987): 77–125. Cho Chaegon, Pobusang: kŭndae kyŏkbyŏngi ŭi sang’in (Pobusang: Merchants in the Tumultuous Times in Modern Korea) (Seoul: Sŏul taehak’gyo ch’ulp’anbu, 2003). Cho Jiman (Cho Chiman). “Chosŏn ch’ogi Taemyŏngnyul ŭi suyong kwachŏng” (The Process of the Acceptance of The Ming Code in Early Chosŏn). Pŏpsahak yŏn’gu. 20 (1999). __________. Chosŏn sidae ŭi hyŏngsapŏp: Taemyŏngnyul kwa kukchŏn (The Criminal Law in Chosŏn: The Ming Code and the National Codes) (Seoul: Kyŏng’in munhwasa, 2007).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Joseon Literati's Righteous Principles
    STUDIA ORIENTALNE 2021, nr 2 (20) ISSN 2299-1999 https://doi.org/10.15804/so2021209 Haesung Lee1 Joseon Literati’s Righteous Principles (Yiriron) as a Moral Practice in the Political Realities – Its Meaning and Limitation in a Historical Context Introduction:Dohak – the Joseon Neo-Confucianism Neo-Confucianism flourished as a central ideology and absolute social order during the Joseon dynasty (朝鮮 1392–1910). “Neo-Confucianism” is a gen- eral term commonly applied to the revival of the various strands of Confucian philosophy during the Chinese Sòng dynasty (宋 960–1280 C.E.), re-exam- ined and reconstructed by Zhu Xi (朱熹, 1130–1200 AD.) It provided Koreans with philosophical speculation, moral and social norms, and a most strongly functional lifestyle. However, the terms of Joseon Neo-Confucianism con- note some specific characteristics, compared to classic Confucianism and the Chinese version of “Neo-Confucianism”2. The term of Dohak (道學 Chin. Dàoxué) – Dao (Way) Learning – already existed in classical Confucian context. However, in Korea, it is generally called Dohak (道學), which concerns Neo-Confucianism of the Joseon dynasty in a holistic scale. Thus, a proper understanding of the term Dohak is essential to comprehend the essence and particular characteristics of Korean Neo-Con- fucianism. Among the similar terms which refer to Neo-Confucianism, such as Jujahak (朱子學 Chin. Zhūzǐxué: Zhu Xi’s Science) and Jeongjuhak (程朱學 1 University of Wrocław, Poland, ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5185-3586, e-mail: [email protected]. 2 The Korean Neo-Confucianism 1) was condensed rather into an anthropological, centripetal, and inward way such as the “Four-Seven” theory and Human Nature; 2) pursued to seek religious an ethical legitimacy under the name of Confucian teaching, even beyond logical rationality; 3) put much more emphasis on Righteousness and Fidelity in a macroscale; 4) clarified the Righteousness as a theoretic speculation on moral propriety.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontology and Domain Knowledge Base Construction for Contra Dance As An
    Ontology and Domain Knowledge Base Construction for Contra Dance as an Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Case Study in Knowledge Organization of American Folk Dance A thesis submitted to the College of Communication and Information of Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Library and Information Science by L.P. Coladangelo May, 2020 Thesis written by L.P. Coladangelo B.A., Sarah Lawrence College, 2004 M.L.I.S., Kent State University, 2020 Approved by _________________________________________________ Marcia Lei Zeng, Ph.D., Advisor _________________________________________________ Kendra S. Albright, Ph.D., Director, School of Information _________________________________________________ Amy L. Reynolds, Ph.D., Dean, College of Communication and Information ii Table of Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures .......................................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................... x Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background Summary ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Thesis Structure Overview
    [Show full text]
  • Hangeul As a Tool of Resistance Aganst Forced Assimiliation: Making Sense of the Framework Act on Korean Language
    Washington International Law Journal Volume 27 Number 3 6-1-2018 Hangeul as a Tool of Resistance Aganst Forced Assimiliation: Making Sense of the Framework Act on Korean Language Minjung (Michelle) Hur Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wilj Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons Recommended Citation Minjung (Michelle) Hur, Comment, Hangeul as a Tool of Resistance Aganst Forced Assimiliation: Making Sense of the Framework Act on Korean Language, 27 Wash. L. Rev. 715 (2018). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wilj/vol27/iss3/6 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington International Law Journal by an authorized editor of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Compilation © 2018 Washington International Law Journal Association HANGEUL AS A TOOL OF RESISTANCE AGAINST FORCED ASSIMILATION: MAKING SENSE OF THE FRAMEWORK ACT ON KOREAN LANGUAGE Minjung (Michelle) Hur† Abstract: Language policies that mandate a government use a single language may seem controversial and unconstitutional. English-only policies are often seen as xenophobic and discriminatory. However, that may not be the case for South Korea’s Framework Act on Korean Language, which mandates the use of the Korean alphabet, Hangeul, for official documents by government institutions. Despite the resemblance between the Framework Act on Korean Language and English-only policies, the Framework Act should be understood differently than English-only policies because the Hangeul-only movement has an inverse history to English-only movements.
    [Show full text]
  • The Study of Korean Villages During the Japanese Colonial Period and Colonial Modernity
    International Journal of Korean History (Vol.15 No.2, Aug.2010) 35 G The Study of Korean Villages during the Japanese Colonial Period and Colonial Modernity Lee Yong-ki* Implications of the Study of Villages during the Japanese Colonial PeriodG G Villages, or ‘maǎl’ as they are generally known in Korean, have traditionally served as the basic life unit for peasants, and as communal solidarity and autonomous spaces. Prior to Korea becoming an industrial society, the great majority of Koreans consisted of villages. It was within these villages that peasants lived their daily lives, conducted production activities, formed primary human relationships, and were socialized. In addition, peasants also conducted autonomous activities within these villages, such as the coordination of relationships with other members within the community, resolution of problems requiring responses at the village level, and the preservation of the internal communal order. Therefore, the village was perceived as a self-sufficient life zone rather than as a physical entity composed of the cluster of houses. More to the point, it was viewed as a social integration mechanism, or social community which housed the independent customs and notions, as well as structural integration principles, which had been accumulated over time.1 On the other hand, villages were the lowest unit of rule and control by GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG * Research Professor, Academy of East Asian Studies, Sungkyunkwan University 36 The Study of Korean Villages during the Japanese Colonial Period ~ the state. Up until the mid-Chosǂn dynasty, natural villages, which were the basic unit of communal life of the people, were subordinated within the local administrative village system under the control of the local ruling elites called the chaeji sajok (㉄㉆㊨㘂, local leading clans or influentials).
    [Show full text]
  • The Bible and Empire in the Divided Korean Peninsula in Search for a Theological Imagination for Just Peace
    University of Dublin Trinity College The Bible and Empire in the Divided Korean Peninsula In Search for a Theological Imagination for Just Peace A Dissertation Submitted For the Degree of DOCTOR of PHILOSOPHY By Youngseop Lim Irish School of Ecumenics February 2021 Declaration I declare that this thesis has not been submitted as an exercise for a degree at this or any other university and it is entirely my own work. I agree to deposit this thesis in the University’s open access institutional repository or allow the Library to do so on my behalf, subject to Irish Copyright Legislation and Trinity College Library conditions of use and acknowledgement. Signed: _____________________________________ Date: _______________________________________ iii Summary The major objective of this thesis is to examine the relationship between biblical interpretation and imperialism in the context of the Korean conflict. This study takes its starting point in the questions of what caused the Korean conflict, and what role the Bible has played in the divided Korean church and society. In order to find answers to these questions, this study is carried out in several steps. The first step is to explore just peace and imperial peace in the Bible as a conceptual framework. The second step seeks to reconstruct the history of Korean Christianity, the relationship between church and state, and the impact of American church and politics from postcolonial perspective. As the third step, this study focuses on the homiletical discourses of Korean megachurches in terms of their relation to the dominant ideologies, such as anticommunism, national security, pro-Americanism, and economic prosperity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hwadam Jip and Seo Gyeongdeok’ S Place in the Intellectual History of Joseon Isabelle Sancho
    What Master Hwadam Loved to Learn: The Hwadam jip and Seo Gyeongdeok’ s Place in the Intellectual History of Joseon Isabelle Sancho To cite this version: Isabelle Sancho. What Master Hwadam Loved to Learn: The Hwadam jip and Seo Gyeongdeok’ s Place in the Intellectual History of Joseon. THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES, 2020, 23, pp.55 - 88. 10.25024/review.2020.23.1.55. hal-02903511 HAL Id: hal-02903511 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02903511 Submitted on 21 Jul 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License Special Feature What Master Hwadam Loved to Learn: The Hwadam jip and Seo Gyeongdeok’s Place in the Intellectual History of Joseon Isabelle SANCHO The Review of Korean Studies Volume 23 Number 1 (June 2020): 55-88 doi: 10.25024/review.2020.23.1.55 ©2020 by the Academy of Korean Studies. All rights reserved. 56 The Review of Korean Studies Introduction Seo Gyeongdeok 徐敬德 (1489-1546), better known as Hwadam 花潭 or Master Hwadam, is seen today as a respected scholar of the Joseon period.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reception and Reappraisal of Neo-Confucianism in the Beginnings of Chosŏn Korea
    Confucian identity, political ideals and philosophical exegesis: the reception and reappraisal of Neo-Confucianism in the beginnings of Chosŏn Korea. Isabelle Sancho To cite this version: Isabelle Sancho. Confucian identity, political ideals and philosophical exegesis: the reception and reappraisal of Neo-Confucianism in the beginnings of Chosŏn Korea.. Doctoral. Harvard University, Korea Institute, Lecture and Performance Series, France. 2008. hal-02905217 HAL Id: hal-02905217 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02905217 Submitted on 23 Jul 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Lecture and Performance Series: History and Culture of Chosŏn Korea (1392-1910) Sponsored by the Academy of Korean Studies (Korea), Provostial Fund in Arts and Humanities, and the Korea Institute, Harvard University February 28, 2008 Dr. Isabelle SANCHO Korea Foundation Postdoctoral Fellow Korea Institute, Harvard University Confucian identity, political ideals and philosophical exegesis: the reception and reappraisal of Neo-Confucianism in the beginnings of Chosŏn Korea Chosŏn Korea is commonly described as having elevated Neo-Confucianism to the status of state ideology, in contrast to Koryŏ period, which is defined as a Buddhist state. The adjective Confucian is then often used to qualify the institutions, bureaucratic system, examination system, and scholar-officials of Chosŏn period.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward W. Wagner 1924 - 2001
    EDWARD W. WAGNER 1924 - 2001 by Lee Hoon-sang The Review of Korean Studies, in cooperation with Jeongsin munhwa yeongu (Korean Studies Quarterly), features interviews with eminent Korean studies scholars worldwide. In this ninth interview, we introduce Edward Willett Wagner, Professor and Director of Korea Institute at Harvard University, now deceased. The article was written by Lee Hoon- sang, Professor of Korean history at Donga University. He teaches and stud- ies contemporary affairs of Korea. He has written many articles and books on the hyangni (local functionaries) and the elite of late Joseon. The Board of The Review of Korean Studies would like to express our deepest gratitude to Prof. Lee Hoon-sang for graciously agreeing to write this biography. Further thanks go to Prof. Martina Deuchler for her kind assistance. - Editor Edward W. Wagner: The Father of Korean Studies in North America 119 Edward W. Wagner: The Father of Korean Studies in North America Lee Hoon-sang His Life and Work Edward Willett Wagner was the pioneer scholar of Korean history in the United States, and he spent most of his life at Harvard University where he trained the next generations of students in Korean history. Harvard was the first American university to establish a Korean history program, and Wagner’s long career par- alleled the development of Korean studies in the U.S. Edward W. Wagner was born in Cleveland, Ohio, in 1924 and admitted to Harvard University in 1941 at the age of seventeen. He enlisted in the U.S. Army in 1943 and served as a civilian adviser in charge of foreign affairs to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Silhak Studies in Korea 1
    Chapter 7 Silhak Studies in Korea 1. Introduction This report reviews the research trends in Korean Silhak Studies published in 2019 by scholar and by topic, and presents the results of a comprehensive analysis of the research outcomes.1 In determining the research trends by scholar, we applied the six categories used in the Report on Korean Confucianism, that is, Yu Hyeong‒won, the Seongho School, the Northern School, Jeong Yak‒ yong, Choe Han‒gi, and others based on prominent Silhak scholars and major Silhak schools, that is the Jungnong School/Seongho School and the Jungsang School/Northern School). The category of “others” included scholars studied as Silhak scholars by a number of researchers over many years. Analysis by topic was performed in the categories of classics, philosophy, politics and economics, and other. Among the papers published under the keyword of Silhak, those with little relevance to Confucianism were excluded from the analysis. A total of 122 papers, comprising 115 papers published in journals registered in the National Research Foundation(KRF) and seven doctoral theses, were included in the analysis categories. Even though the selection criteria were set more strictly, the number of Silhak‒related papers published in Korea increased in 2019. 2. Classification by scholar This report set the categories of Korean Silhak scholars as the Yu Hyeong‒ won, the Seongho School, the Northern School, Jeong Yak‒yong, Choe 1 This report was co‒authored by Oh Jin‒sol and Ha Han‒sol. 180 / Part Ⅱ. Korean Confucianism Han‒gi, and others. Jeong Yak‒yong was set apart as an independent category although he belongs to the Seongho School in consideration of the extraordinarily high impact Jeong Yak‒yong has had on Silhak Studies in Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neo-Confucianism of the Joseon Dynasty: Its Theoretical Foundation and Main Issues
    DOI: 10.4312/as.2016.4.1.165-194 165 The Neo-Confucianism of the Joseon Dynasty: Its Theoretical Foundation and Main Issues HaeSung LEE*1 Abstract The theoretical foundation of Joseon Neo-Confucianism, which started with the theory of the Principle and Material Force (Seongriseol), seeks for the fundamental values of all things in the universe by means of the theories of Cosmology (Ujuron) and Mind and Nature (Simseongron). The theory of Self-Cultivation (Suyangron) pursues ideal char- acter training to reach the ultimate Noble Gentleman’s (Gunja) status; then established the theory of Fidelity (Yiriron), which stresses moral practice against injustice. These theories functioned organically with the theory of Ritual Formalities (Yeseol) and the theory of Statecraft Ideas (Gyeongseron), deeply rooted in Democentrism (Minbonjuyi), in order to realize Confucian ideas as methodological indicators. The theory of Four Beginnings and Seven Emotions (Sadanchiljeongron) extended to be the theories of the Principle’s Dominance (Juriron) and Material Force’s Dominance (Jugiron). Likewise, the theory of Sameness-Difference of Human Nature and Material Nature (Inmulseong Dongiron) became the Horak debates, which formed the Neo-Confucian academic ge- nealogies of the Joseon dynasty. Keywords: Neo-Confucianism, Joseon dynasty, Korean philosophy, theory of Principle and Material Force Izvleček Teoretske osnove novokonfucijanstva korejske dinastije Joseon, ki so zakoreninjene v te- oretskem modelu načela in materialne sile (Seongriseol), vidijo osnovne vrednote vsega bivajočega v teorijah (Ujuron) ter srčni zavesti in naravi (Simseongron). Teorija samo-kulti- vacije (Suyangron) opisuje kultivacijo posameznika, katerega značaj naj bi v tem postopku sčasoma dosegel stopnjo plemenitnika (Gunja). Utemeljena je tudi na teoriji zvestobe oziroma lojalnosti (Yiriron), ki poudarja moralno prakso in si prek nje prizadeva odprav- iti nepravičnost.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The State and Identity Construction in Chosǒn Korea Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8sm4g242 Author Hur, Joon Publication Date 2019 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles The State and Identity Construction in Chosǒn Korea A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Asian Languages and Cultures by Joon Hur 2019 © Copyright by Joon Hur 2019 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTAION The State and Identity Construction in Chosǒn Korea by Joon Hur Doctor of Philosophy in Asian Languages and Cultures University of California, Los Angeles, 2019 Professor John Duncan, Chair This dissertation examines whether, among Koreans in the premodern period, there existed a shared collective identity that could be utilized by modernizing nationalists and that significantly informed the nature of nationalism in twentieth century Korea. The specific time this dissertation delves into is the period of the Chosǒn dynasty (1392-1910), especially the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries which are believed to be the most important period of Korea’s institutional and philosophical systemization. Examining the reciprocal interactions among Chosǒn people and their accompanying political and intellectual debates, this dissertation explores how the government’s state-building project, generally understood as Korea’s Confucianization in existing studies, contributed to the construction of a shared collective identity among the constituent social groups of Chosǒn. This dissertation consists of four chapters. Chapter One delves into ritual debates such as the debates on the sacrifice to Heaven during the early Chosǒn period in which the Chosǒn elite should refer to their state’s history and tradition to support their arguments.
    [Show full text]
  • Seowon, Korean Neo-Confucian Academies Property on 2 to 8 September 2018
    At the request of the State Party, an ICOMOS Advisory process was conducted on October 2016 – March 2017. Seowon, Korean Neo-Confucian Based on the recommendations of the ICOMOS advisory Academies report, the State Party has submitted a revised nomination dossier. (Republic of Korea) No 1498 Consultations and Technical Evaluation Mission Desk reviews have been provided by ICOMOS International Scientific Committees, members and independent experts. Official name as proposed by the State Party An ICOMOS technical evaluation mission visited the Seowon, Korean Neo-Confucian Academies property on 2 to 8 September 2018. Location Additional information received by ICOMOS Youngju City, Gyeongsangbuk-do Province A letter was sent to the State Party on 10 October 2018 Hamyang County, Gyeongsangnam-do Province requesting further information about mapping, comparative Gyeongju City, Gyeongsangbuk-do Province analysis, integrity, authenticity and management. Andong City, Gyeongsangbuk-do Province Additional information was received on 6 November 2018 Jangseong County, Jeollanam-do Province from State Party, and has been incorporated into the Dalseong County, Daegu Metropolitan City relevant sections of this evaluation report. Andong City, Gyeongsangbuk-do Province Jeungeup City, Jeollabuk-do Province An Interim Report was provided to the State Party on Nonsan City, Chungcheongnam-do Province 21 December 2018 summarising the issues identified by Republic of Korea the ICOMOS World Heritage Panel. Brief description Further information was requested in the Interim Report This serial property comprises nine seowon representing a including: the justification of criterion (iv), the protection of type of Neo-Confucian academy of the Joseon Dynasty the landscape and distant views, overall integrated (15th – 19th centuries CE).
    [Show full text]