10. Zatwierdzenie Protokołu Poprzedniego Posiedzenia 11. Strategia Lizbońska — Zintegrowane Wytyczne Dotyczące Wzrostu I Za

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

10. Zatwierdzenie Protokołu Poprzedniego Posiedzenia 11. Strategia Lizbońska — Zintegrowane Wytyczne Dotyczące Wzrostu I Za

C 96 E/34 Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej PL 17.4.2008 Wtorek, 19 lutego 2008 r. 10. Zatwierdzenie protokołu poprzedniego posiedzenia Protokół poprzedniego posiedzenia został zatwierdzony. PRZEWODNICTWO: Rodi KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU Wiceprzewodnicząca 11. Strategia lizbońska — zintegrowane wytyczne dotyczące wzrostu i zatrudnienia (część: ogólne wytyczne dla polityk gospodarczych państw członkowskich i Wspólnoty): rozpoczęcie nowego cyklu (2008-2010) (debata) Oświadczenia Rady i Komisji: Strategia Lizbońska Sprawozdanie w sprawie zintegrowanych wytycznych dotyczących wzrostu i zatrudnienia (część: ogólne wytyczne dla polityk gospodarczych państw członkowskich i Wspólnoty): rozpoczęcie nowego cyklu (2008-2010) [2007/2275(INI)] — Komisja Gospodarcza i Monetarna. Sprawozdawczyni: Margarita Starkevičiūtė (A6-0029/2008) Žiga Turk (urzędujący przewodniczący Rady), Günter Verheugen (wiceprzewodniczący Komisji) i Joaquín Almunia (członek Komisji) złożyli oświadczenia. PRZEWODNICTWO: Luisa MORGANTINI Wiceprzewodnicząca Margarita Starkevičiūtė przedstawiła sprawozdanie. Głos zabrali: Marianne Thyssen w imieniu grupy PPE-DE, Robert Goebbels w imieniu grupy PSE, Bilyana Ilieva Raeva w imieniu grupy ALDE, Guntars Krasts w imieniu grupy UEN, Rebecca Harms w imieniu grupy Verts/ALE, Ilda Figueiredo w imieniu grupy GUE/NGL, Johannes Blokland w imieniu grupy IND/DEM, Sergej Kozlík niezrzeszony, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Udo Bullmann, Wolf Klinz, Eoin Ryan, Mikel Irujo Amezaga, Helmuth Markov, John Whittaker, Frank Vanhecke, Cristobal Montoro Romero, Edit Herczog, Lena Ek, Zbigniew Krzysztof Kuźmiuk, Sahra Wagenknecht, Patrick Louis, Malcolm Harbour i Anne Van Lancker. PRZEWODNICTWO: Edward McMILLAN-SCOTT Wiceprzewodniczący Głos zabrali: Adina-Ioana Vălean, Andrzej Tomasz Zapałowski, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Kathy Sinnott, José Albino Silva Peneda, Jan Andersson, Olle Schmidt, Wojciech Roszkowski, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Elisa Ferreira, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Ryszard Czarnecki, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Pervenche Berès, Charlotte Ceder- schiöld, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Françoise Grossetête, Donata Gottardi, Gay Mitchell, Dariusz Rosati, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Karsten Friedrich Hoppenstedt, Margaritis Schinas, Zsolt László Bec- sey, Jacques Toubon, Bogusław Sonik i Reinhard Rack. Głos zabrali na zasadzie pytań z sali: Jerzy Buzek, Czesław Adam Siekierski, Inés Ayala Sender i Emanuel Jardim Fernandes. Głos zabrali: Žiga Turk, Günter Verheugen, Joaquín Almunia i Margarita Starkevičiūtė. Projekty rezolucji złożone na podstawie art. 103 ust. 2 Regulaminu na zakończenie debaty: — Francis Wurtz, Ilda Figueiredo, Helmuth Markov, Gabriele Zimmer, Eva-Britt Svensson, Esko Seppänen i Roberto Musacchio w imieniu grupy GUE/NGL, w sprawie wkładu w dotyczącą strategii lizbońskiej debatę na wiosennym szczycie Rady Europejskiej w 2008 r. (B6-0073/2008);.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

5. Fight Against Terrorism (Debate)
C 124 E/16EN Official Journal of the European Union 25.5.2006 Tuesday 7 June 2005 — Alain Lipietz, Monica Frassoni, Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf, Raül Romeva i Rueda and Eva Lichtenberger, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, on the situation in Bolivia (B6-0365/2005); — Jonas Sjöstedt, Helmuth Markov, Luisa Morgantini, Vittorio Agnoletto, Ilda Figueiredo and Athana- sios Pafilis, on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group, on the situation in Bolivia (B6-0367/2005); — Fernando Fernández Martín, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra and Bernd Posselt, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group, on the situation in Bolivia (B6-0376/2005). II. FREEDOM OF THE PRESS IN ALGERIA — Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, on behalf of the ALDE Group, on Algeria (B6-0359/2005); — Pasqualina Napoletano and Raimon Obiols i Germà, on behalf of the PSE Group, on freedom of the press in Algeria (B6-0363/2005); — Hélène Flautre and Raül Romeva i Rueda, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, on freedom of the press in Algeria (B6-0366/2005); — Francis Wurtz, on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group, on freedom of the press in Algeria (B6-0368/2005); — Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis, on behalf of the UEN Group, on freedom of the press in Algeria (B6-0380/2005); — Luisa Fernanda Rudi Ubeda, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group, on freedom of the press in Algeria (B6-0381/2005). III. AZERBAIJAN — Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, on behalf of the ALDE Group, on Azerbaijan (B6-0360/2005); — Pasqualina Napoletano, Hannes Swoboda and Jan Marinus Wiersma, on behalf of the PSE Group, on Azerbaijan (B6-0364/2005); — Vittorio Agnoletto, on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group, on the situation in Azerbaijan (B6-0369/2005); — Charles Tannock, Vytautas Landsbergis, Árpád Duka-Zólyomi and Bernd Posselt, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group, on Azerbaijan (B6-0375/2005); — Bastiaan Belder, on behalf of the IND/DEM Group, on Azerbaijan (B6-0378/2005); — Marie Anne Isler Béguin and Cem Özdemir, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, on Azerbaijan (B6-0379/2005); — Anna Elzbieta Fotyga, on behalf of the UEN Group, on human rights and democracy in Azerbaijan (B6-0382/2005).
[Show full text]
Declaración Del Parlamento Europeo Sobre La Fibromialgia
C 46 E/46 ES Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea 24.2.2010 Martes, 13 de enero de 2009 Fibromialgia P6_TA(2009)0014 Declaración del Parlamento Europeo sobre la fibromialgia (2010/C 46 E/07) El Parlamento Europeo, — Visto el artículo 116 de su Reglamento, A. Considerando que cerca de 14 millones de personas en la Unión Europea y entre el 1 y el 3 % de la población mundial total sufre de fibromialgia, un síndrome debilitante que causa dolores crónicos generalizados, B. Considerando que, aunque la Organización Mundial de la Salud reconoció la fibromialgia como enfer medad ya en 1992, esta patología no está incluida en el índice oficial de patologías en la UE, lo cual impide a los pacientes obtener un diagnóstico oficial, C. Considerando que las personas que sufren de fibromialgia acuden con más frecuencia al médico de cabe cera, son remitidos con mayor frecuencia a especialistas, reciben más certificados de baja por enfermedad y son hospitalizados con mayor frecuencia, lo que genera una carga económica considerable para la UE, D. Considerando que los pacientes de fibromialgia tienen que luchar por llevar una vida plena e indepen diente, a menos que tengan acceso a un tratamiento y un apoyo adecuados, 1. Pide al Consejo y a la Comisión que: — desarrollen una estrategia comunitaria sobre la fibromialgia con objeto de que esta patología sea recono cido como enfermedad; — contribuyan a la sensibilización sobre esta patología y faciliten el acceso a la información para profesio nales y pacientes, apoyando las campañas de la UE y nacionales de sensibilización; — alienten a los Estados miembros a mejorar el acceso al diagnóstico y al tratamiento; — promuevan la investigación sobre la fibromialgia mediante los programas de trabajo del Séptimo Programa Marco de Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnológico y futuros programas de investigación; — promuevan el desarrollo de programas para la recopilación de datos sobre la fibromialgia; 2.
[Show full text]
Der Halbierte Demos
Klaus Höpcke Der halbierte Demos Nach der Europa-Wahl: Parteiensystem delegitimiert? Wie gehen wir mit PDS-Wahlergebnissen um: Erfreut? Nüchtern? Fragen wir: Warum nicht sieben Prozent? TEXTE & ARGUMENTE (Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung in Thüringen) Thüringer Forum für Bildung und Wissenschaft e.V. 2 KLAUS HÖPCKE Von 26,5 Millionen Bürgerinnen und Bürgern der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, die am 13. Juni 2004 an der Wahl der Abgeordneten des Europa-Parlaments teil- genommen haben, was einer Wahlbeteiligung von 43 % entspricht, gaben andert- halb Millionen (genau: 1.579.693) ihre Stimme den auf einer offenen Liste ange- tretenen Kandidatinnen und Kandidaten der PDS. Das ergab einen Anteil von 6,1 % an den abgegebenen 25.780.773 gültigen Stimmen. Damit gehören dem Europäischen Parlament statt bisher sechs künftig sieben Politikerinnen und Politiker an, die das Europa-Wahlprogramm der Partei des Demokratischen Sozialismus vertreten. Es sind dies: Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Helmuth Markov, Gabi Zimmer, Tobias Pflüger, Sahra Wagenknecht, André Brie, Feleknas Uca. Wahlenthaltung einer 57-Prozent-Mehrheit Bevor wir uns den PDS-Wahlergebnissen im einzelnen zuwenden, halten wir ei- nen Augenblick bei der Wahlbeteiligung inne: Eine Mehrheit von 57 % der Wahl- berechtigten hat nicht gewählt. In der Zeitschrift „DeutschlandArchiv“ (Heft 4/2004, Seiten 556–560) wertet Hans-Georg Golz, Bonn, in einem Kommentar unter der Überschrift „Zeit des Abstrafens“ die drastische Wahlenthaltung als das gravierendste Ergebnis der Juni-Wahlen 2004. Damit hat er meines Erachtens recht. Mir scheint aber, aus dieser Tatsache ergeben sich grundsätzlichere Fragen, als er sie stellt. Die Vorstellung von der Legitimität, der politischen Rechtmäßigkeit eines de- mokratischen Staats beruht auf der Annahme, in ihm bestimme das Volk, wer ge- wählt wird und wer nicht; dem gemäß gehe die Staatsgewalt vom Volk aus.
[Show full text]
Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C Tájékoztatások És Közlemények
2006.5.25. HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C 124 E/25 2005. június 7., kedd 11. A kibővült Unió 2007 és 2013 közötti politikai kihívásai és költségvetési eszközei (vita) Jelentés a kibővült Unió 2007 és 2013 közötti politikai kihívásairól és költségvetési eszközeiről [2004/2209(INI)] – A kibővült Unió 2007 és 2013 közötti politikai kihívásaival és költségvetési eszkö- zeivel foglalkozó ideiglenes bizottság. Előadó: Reimer Böge (A6-0153/2005) Reimer Böge előterjeszti a jelentést. Felszólal: Nicolas Schmit (a Tanács soros elnöke) és José Manuel Barroso (a Bizottság elnöke). Felszólal: Véronique De Keyser (az AFET bizottság véleményének előadója), Margrietus van den Berg (a DEVE bizottság véleményének előadója), Pierre Jonckheer (az INTA bizottság véleményének előadója), Enrico Letta (az ECON bizottság véleményének előadója), Jamila Madeira (az EMPL bizottság véleményének előadója), Jutta D. Haug (az ENVI bizottság véleményének előadója), Paul Rübig (az ITRE bizottság véleményének előadója), Phillip Whitehead (az IMCO bizottság véleményének előadója), Etelka Barsi-Pataky (a TRAN bizottság véleményének előadója), Constanze Angela Krehl (a REGI bizottság véleményének előadója), Albert Jan Maat (az AGRI bizottság véleményének előadója), Ruth Hieronymi (a CULT bizottság véleményének előadója), Gérard Deprez (a LIBE bizottság véleményének előadója), Johannes Voggenhuber (az AFCO bizottság véleményének előadója), Ilda Figueiredo (a FEMM bizottság véleményének előadója), Jan Mulder (a CONT bizottság véleményének előadója), Paulo Casaca (a PECH
[Show full text]
European Parliament
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2004 2009 Committee on International Trade INTA_PV(2004)1011_1 MINUTES of the meeting of 11 October 2004, 3.00 pm - 6.30 pm, and 12 October 2004, 9.00 am - 12.30 pm BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 3.15 pm on Monday, 11 October 2004, with Enrique Barón Crespo, chairperson, in the chair. 1. Adoption of draft agenda The draft agenda was adopted. 2. Chairperson's announcements None. 3. Approval of minutes of the meeting of: 29-30 September 2004, Brussels. The adoption of the minutes was postponed. In the presence of the Council and the European Commission 4. The reform of the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector Presentation by representatives of the European Commission (Russell Mildon, Director, DG Agriculture and Jens Schaps, Head of Unit, DG Trade) Speakers: Johan Van Hecke, Margrietus J. van den Berg, Erika Mann, Reimer Böge, Béla Glattfelder, Helmuth Markov, Pierre Jonckheer, Zbigniew Franciszek Zaleski, Jacky Henin and Georgios Papastamkos. PV\543671EN.doc PE 347.258 Or. en EN EN VOTING TIME 5. Calendar of meetings for 2005 Adoption Decision: The Calendar of meetings for 2005 was adopted with 1 vote against and no abstentions. 6. Annual report on arms exports INTA/6/23710 - 2004/2103 (INI) PE 347.135 v01-00 PE 347.219 v01-00 Draftsperson: Jacky Henin Adoption of draft opinion Amendments adopted: 4, 8, 9 modified orally, 10, 12, Oral, 15, 16, 17, 18 Amendments rejected: 2, 3, 5, 7 Amendments falling: 1, 6, 11, 13, 14 Decision: The draft opinion, as amended, was adopted unanimously.
[Show full text]
European Parliament
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 1999 2004 Session document FINAL A5-0444/2002 9 December 2002 REPORT on the Commission White Paper ‘European transport policy for 2010: time to decide’ (COM(2001) 370 – C5-0658/2001 – 2001/2281(COS)) Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism Rapporteur: Juan de Dios Izquierdo Collado RR\484385EN.doc PE 301.855 EN EN PE 301.855 2/31 RR\484385EN.doc EN CONTENTS Page PROCEDURAL PAGE.............................................................................................................. 4 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION ............................................................................................. 5 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT............................................................................................ 17 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, EXTERNAL TRADE, RESEARCH AND ENERGY........................................................................................................................ 21 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND CONSUMER POLICY ............................................................................................................ 26 RR\484385EN.doc 3/31 PE 301.855 EN PROCEDURAL PAGE By letter of 14 September 2001 the Commission forwarded to Parliament its White Paper ‘European transport policy for 2010: time to decide’ (COM(2001) 370 – 2001/2281(COS)). At the sitting of 13 December 2001 the President of Parliament announced that she had referred the White Paper to the Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism as the committee
[Show full text]
European Parliament
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ««« « « « « 1999 « « 2004 ««« Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs PE/V/PV/02-17 MINUTES of the meeting of 4 November 2002, 3 pm - 6.30 pm, and 5 November 2002, 9 am - 12.30 pm and 3 pm - 6.30 pm BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 3.15 pm on Monday, 4 November 2002, with Christa Randzio-Plath, chairwoman, in the chair. 1. Adoption of draft agenda PE 315.25 The draft agenda was adopted. 2. Chairman's announcements: The Chair announced the following events: - 4 November 2002, 6 pm - Delegation meeting with ECOFIN Troika centering on the extension of the Lamfalussy procedure and current legislation on financial services, - 13 November 2002, 2.30 pm - Presentation of the Commission's Autumn Economic Forecasts by Commissioner Pedro SOLBES, immediately following their adoption, - 19 November 2002 in Strasburg - special meeting of the Committee to vote on the KARAS Report on streamlining the annual co-ordination cycles, - 27 November 2002, 3 pm - in the context of the next meeting of the Committee, exchange of views with Commissioner Mario MONTI on current competition issues. PV\475979EN.doc PE 315.029 Or. en EN EN The Chair also informed members present that the Conference of Presidents had decided on 23 October 2002 not to authorise initiative reports on the preparation of the Spring Summit. 3. Any other business There was no other business 4. Approval of minutes of the meetings of: 01 + 02 October 2002 in Brussels PE 315.012 The minutes were approved. 5. Appointment of rapporteurs and draftspersons-Decisions of the co-ordinators' meeting of 22 October 2002 in Strasbourg Regarding the Bourlanges report on the classification and hierarchy of EU acts the Committee approved the co-ordinators' decision to submit two amendments in line with its position on the issue, directly to the Committee on Constitutional Affairs.
[Show full text]
Europolitics
CLIMATE CHANGE ECONOMIC POLICY NATO DEFENCE MEETING EU executive proposes disaster Union struggles for unified stance EU reinforcements in Afghanistan prevention strategy Page 5 on crisis Page 6 for limited time? Page 10 EUROPOLITICS The European affairs daily Tuesday 24 February 2009 N° 3700 37th year FOCUS GENERAL AFFAIRS COUNCIL Five billion euro plan: EU appeals to Decisions delayed until March Israel By Célia Sampol margins of 2009. Six countries had already By Eric van Puyvelde shown reluctance on this point during the The Council of Ministers failed to reach last Ecofin Council (Germany, the United an agreement on ways to finance the €5 Kingdom, Italy, Sweden, the Netherlands The future Israeli government must billion included in the European Commis- and Austria) – arguing that it was not possible relaunch the peace process with the sion’s economic recovery plan or on the final to dip into the margins of the 2008 budget Palestinians, urged the EU foreign min- list of projects to be financed. However, the because that period was already over and that isters at their Council, on 23 February debate continues and decisions have been in order to do that it would be necessary to in Brussels. Things could be rough, postponed until March. revise the financial perspectives. acknowledged Alexandr Vondra, the That is what emerged from the General Czech deputy prime minister and Affairs Council of 23 February in Brussels. SOUNDING OUT PARLIAMENT current Council president. Some are On the actual projects, a small number of But contagion has set in and most member concerned about the attitude of the delegations remain dissatisfied with the latest states now think that this “is not the right path right-of-centre government to be put list put forward by the Commission, which to follow”.
[Show full text]
Advanced Therapies – Ethics Vs Politics
Issue 248 18 June 2007 INSIDE: Europabio’s Stephanie Pingitzer The Big Donor show: Frédérique Ries on organ donation Making life healthier: The Joint Research Centre in action Medical Research ADVANCED THERAPIES – ETHICS VS POLITICS NANOTECHNOLOGY PLUS: UNDER THE MICROSCOPE Profile: Helmuth Markov Expert comment Wolfgang Heusel, Diana and analysis from: Wallis & Klaus-Heiner Mark Morrison Lehne on ERA’s birthday Mihail Roco Bulgarian MEPs, Romanian Markus Pridoehl PM visit, Ukraine Issue 248 18 June 2007 Editor’s comment not only want one permanent After the “no” vote in France, he could seat for the European parliament show that he was pro-reform of the EU and Strasbourg is a beautiful Alsatian but that 81 per cent want the was willing to take the practical step of town but the monthly commute seat to be in Brussels and to end allowing the EU to work more effectively blights the lives of MEPs and the monthly trips to Strasbourg. and efficiently by having one site for the their staff. Some deputies have to 84 per cent also believed that parliament. He could send a clear message leave as early as Sunday in order parliament should be able to on climate change and carbon foot prints by to arrive for meetings. Which decide on its own location. To date ending the Strasbourg sojourn. member state would allow their this poll marks the most extensive The timing could not be better as national parliaments to work survey of MEPs on the one-seat discussions over the demise of the constitution from two sites? The European question.
[Show full text]
Urg 2018 Annual Report L Rosa Uxemb Stiftung
2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROSA LUXEMBURG STIFTUNG ROSA-LUXEMBURG-STIFTUNG 2018 ANNUAL REPORT 2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROSA-LUXEMBURG-STIFTUNG 1 CONTENTS EDITORIAL 4 FOCUS: MARX2006 OntheShouldersofKarlMarx 6 MultimediaMarx—TheWebPortal 8 TheCongressMarx200: Politics—Theory—Socialism9 Marx200aroundGermany 10 K is for Karl—ASeriesofFilmsbyPaulMason 10 MarxforEveryone!—EducationalMaterialsforBeginners 11 AClassicinitsJubileeYear—CapitalReadingCoursesandthe11thAutumnSchool 12 ProjectsSupportedbytheRLSin2018asPartofMarx200 12 PublicationsRelatedtoMarx200 13 INSTITUTE FOR CRITICAL SOCIAL ANALYSIS 14 ConnectiveClassPolitics 15 Fellows 16 NewAuthoritarianismandtheRadicalRight 17 “WeAccuse!”—TheHealthcareSystemonTrial 18 LuxemburgLectures2018 20 THE ACADEMY FOR POLITICAL EDUCATION 22 TheCaseisNotClosed!—SentencingattheMunichNSUTrial 23 ShapingtheFuturethroughLeftistProfessionalDevelopment 23 LocalPolitics:ACrashCourse 24 IntheRight(s):InternationalMovementsforGlobalJustice 24 ASocietyofManyDifferentStrenghts 25 THE HISTORICAL CENTRE FOR DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM 26 100YearsofRevolutioninGermany 27 1968:AGlobalAwakening 28 1938:TheYearBeforetheWar 29 THE RLS NETWORK ACROSS GERMANY 30 Baden-Württemberg:PoliticalAcademyforYoungActivists 32 Bavaria:TheBavarianRevolutionandtheBavarianSovietRepublicof1918/19 32 Berlin:TheRed-Red-GreenCoalitionanditsHousingPolicy:TakingStock 33 Brandenburg:StructuralTransformationinLusatia 33 Bremen:City/Data/Explosion 34 Hamburg:StrategiesforCombatingAnti-Feminism 34 Hesse:AuthoritarianismandResistanceinTurkey 35 Mecklenburg-Vorpommern:TheRoleoftheJudiciaryintheMunichNSUTrial
[Show full text]
EW 2004 Stimmzettel Muster.Pdf
Stimmzettel für die Wahl der Abgeordneten des Europäischen Parlaments am 13. Juni 2004 im Land Bremen ______ Sie haben 1 Stimme Ð Bitte hier ankreuzen SPD Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands — Gemeinsame Liste für alle Länder — 1. Martin Schulz, Buchhändler/MdEP, Würselen (NW) 6. Constanze Krehl, Dipl.-Informatikerin/MdEP, Leipzig (SN) 1 2. Mechtild Rothe, Mitglied des Europäischen Parlaments, Bad Lippspringe (NW) 7. Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Landwirt/MdEP, Geretsried (BY) 3. Ralf Walter, Mitglied des Europäischen Parlaments, Cochem (RP) 8. Erika Mann, Dipl.-Pädagogin/MdEP, Bad Gandersheim (NI) 4. Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Juristin/MdEP, Berlin (BE) 9. Bernhard Rapkay, Mitglied des Europäischen Parlaments, Dortmund (NW) 5. Dr. Udo Bullmann, Politikwissenschaftler/MdEP, Gießen (HE) 10. Vural Öger, selbständig, Hamburg (HH) 〇 CDU Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands — Liste für das Land Bremen — 1. Jörg Jäger, Dipl.-Ökonom, Bremen 2 2. Sandra Speckert, Steuerfachgehilfin, Bremen 3. Silke Allers, Dipl.-Chemikerin, Bremerhaven 4. Marcus Vieweg, Schornsteinfegermeister, Bremen 〇 GRÜNE BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN — Gemeinsame Liste für alle Länder — 1. Rebecca Harms, Landtagsabgeordnete, Waddeweitz (NI) 6. Cem Özdemir, Politiker, Berlin (BE) 3 2. Daniel Marc Cohn-Bendit, Mitglied des Europäischen Parlaments, Frankfurt am Main (HE) 7. Gisela Kallenbach, Dipl.-Ingenieurin (FH)/Referentin, Leipzig (SN) 3. Heidemarie-Rose Rühle, Psychologin, Stuttgart (BW) 8. Dr. Frithjof Schmidt, Sozialwissenschaftler, Bochum (NW) 4. Dr. Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf, Bauer, Spenge (NW) 9. Hiltrud Breyer, Dipl.-Politologin, Mandelbachtal (SL) 5. Angelika Beer, Politikerin, Groß Kummerfeld (SH) 10. Michael Cramer, Lehrer/Abgeordneter, Berlin (BE) 〇 FDP Freie Demokratische Partei — Gemeinsame Liste für alle Länder — 1. Dr. Silvana Koch-Mehrin, Unternehmensberaterin, Köln (NW) 6. Alexander Pickart Alvaro, Bankkaufmann, Düsseldorf (NW) 4 2.
[Show full text]
De Gezichten Van Het Europees Parlement 2007-2009 (Pdf)
De gezichten van het Europees Parlement 2007-2009 Inhoudsopgave ■ Inleiding door de voorzitter 3 ■ Het Europees Parlement 5 ■ De voorzitter van het Europees Parlement 5 ■ De leden van het Europees Parlement en de fracties 6 ■ Politieke organen 10 ■ Conferentie van voorzitters 10 ■ Leden van de Conferentie van voorzitters 10 ■ Bureau 12 ■ Quaestoren 12 ■ Bureau von het Europees Parlement 13 ■ Parlementaire commissies 16 ■ De vaste commissies van het EP en hun voozitters 16 ■ Tijdelijke commissie 18 ■ Delegaties 19 2 ■ De delegaties van het EP en hun vorzitters 19 ■ Parlementaire vergaderingen 21 ■ Secretariaat-generaal 22 ■ Organigram van het Europees Parlement 23 Inleiding door de voorzitter Geachte lezer, Het Europees Parlement is de stem van bijna 500 miljoen Europese burgers uit de 27 lidstaten van de Europese Unie. Het is uw parlement, waarin de door u rechtstreeks gekozen Parlementsleden uw belangen behartigen en onze gezamen- lijke toekomst voor een groot deel mee bepalen. De Europese volksvertegenwoordiging is sinds de beginjaren van het Europese eenwordingsproces uitgegroeid van een assemblee met alleen een adviserende stem tot het Europees Parlement zoals we het nu kennen. Het staat nu als wetgever op voet van gelijkheid met de Raad van Ministers, waarin de regeringen van de lidstaten vertegenwoordigd zijn. De Par- lementsleden hebben met succes gestreden voor het recht om mee te beslissen over de begroting van de Europese Unie. Verder speelt het Parlement een belangrijke rol bij de benoeming van de Europese Commissie, die alleen met zijn 3 goedkeuring aan de slag kan gaan. Na zijn ambtsaanvaarding wordt de Commissie, het uitvoerende orgaan van de EU, voortdurend door het Europees Parlement gecontroleerd.
[Show full text]