Advanced Therapies – Ethics Vs Politics
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
5. Fight Against Terrorism (Debate)
C 124 E/16EN Official Journal of the European Union 25.5.2006 Tuesday 7 June 2005 — Alain Lipietz, Monica Frassoni, Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf, Raül Romeva i Rueda and Eva Lichtenberger, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, on the situation in Bolivia (B6-0365/2005); — Jonas Sjöstedt, Helmuth Markov, Luisa Morgantini, Vittorio Agnoletto, Ilda Figueiredo and Athana- sios Pafilis, on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group, on the situation in Bolivia (B6-0367/2005); — Fernando Fernández Martín, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra and Bernd Posselt, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group, on the situation in Bolivia (B6-0376/2005). II. FREEDOM OF THE PRESS IN ALGERIA — Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, on behalf of the ALDE Group, on Algeria (B6-0359/2005); — Pasqualina Napoletano and Raimon Obiols i Germà, on behalf of the PSE Group, on freedom of the press in Algeria (B6-0363/2005); — Hélène Flautre and Raül Romeva i Rueda, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, on freedom of the press in Algeria (B6-0366/2005); — Francis Wurtz, on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group, on freedom of the press in Algeria (B6-0368/2005); — Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis, on behalf of the UEN Group, on freedom of the press in Algeria (B6-0380/2005); — Luisa Fernanda Rudi Ubeda, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group, on freedom of the press in Algeria (B6-0381/2005). III. AZERBAIJAN — Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, on behalf of the ALDE Group, on Azerbaijan (B6-0360/2005); — Pasqualina Napoletano, Hannes Swoboda and Jan Marinus Wiersma, on behalf of the PSE Group, on Azerbaijan (B6-0364/2005); — Vittorio Agnoletto, on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group, on the situation in Azerbaijan (B6-0369/2005); — Charles Tannock, Vytautas Landsbergis, Árpád Duka-Zólyomi and Bernd Posselt, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group, on Azerbaijan (B6-0375/2005); — Bastiaan Belder, on behalf of the IND/DEM Group, on Azerbaijan (B6-0378/2005); — Marie Anne Isler Béguin and Cem Özdemir, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, on Azerbaijan (B6-0379/2005); — Anna Elzbieta Fotyga, on behalf of the UEN Group, on human rights and democracy in Azerbaijan (B6-0382/2005). -
European Parliament Mid-Term Election: What Impact on Migration Policy?
www.epc.eu 16 March 2017 01/12/2009 European Parliament mid-term election: what impact on migration policy? Marco Funk As the dust settles from the European Parliament’s (EP) mid-term election held on 17 January 2017, migration continues to top the EU’s agenda. The election of Antonio Tajani to replace Martin Schulz as president of the EP brought the institution under the leadership of the European People’s Party (EPP) after a power-sharing agreement with the socialist S&D was cancelled and replaced by a last-minute deal with the liberal ALDE group. A closer look at Tajani’s election and associated reshuffle of key internal positions suggests little change in the EP’s course on migration in the short term. However, upcoming developments may significantly change Parliament dynamics in the longer term. New president, different style Antonio Tajani is considered by many to be a less political, less activist president compared to Martin Schulz. The former is also apparently less willing to insist on a prominent role for the EP than the latter. Furthermore, Tajani shares the same conservative political affiliation as the heads of the European Commission and European Council, which makes ideological confrontations with Jean-Claude Juncker and Donald Tusk even less likely than under Schulz, who had few disagreements with either. While Schulz already maintained good relations with Juncker and closely coordinated responses to the large influx of refugees in 2015/2016, Tajani is even better placed to cooperate effectively due to his previous Commission experience and ideological alignment. Despite Tajani’s association with Italy’s populist conservative leader Silvio Berlusconi, he has adopted a more mainstream conservative political identity, which ultimately won him the EPP’s support. -
Declaración Del Parlamento Europeo Sobre La Fibromialgia
C 46 E/46 ES Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea 24.2.2010 Martes, 13 de enero de 2009 Fibromialgia P6_TA(2009)0014 Declaración del Parlamento Europeo sobre la fibromialgia (2010/C 46 E/07) El Parlamento Europeo, — Visto el artículo 116 de su Reglamento, A. Considerando que cerca de 14 millones de personas en la Unión Europea y entre el 1 y el 3 % de la población mundial total sufre de fibromialgia, un síndrome debilitante que causa dolores crónicos generalizados, B. Considerando que, aunque la Organización Mundial de la Salud reconoció la fibromialgia como enfer medad ya en 1992, esta patología no está incluida en el índice oficial de patologías en la UE, lo cual impide a los pacientes obtener un diagnóstico oficial, C. Considerando que las personas que sufren de fibromialgia acuden con más frecuencia al médico de cabe cera, son remitidos con mayor frecuencia a especialistas, reciben más certificados de baja por enfermedad y son hospitalizados con mayor frecuencia, lo que genera una carga económica considerable para la UE, D. Considerando que los pacientes de fibromialgia tienen que luchar por llevar una vida plena e indepen diente, a menos que tengan acceso a un tratamiento y un apoyo adecuados, 1. Pide al Consejo y a la Comisión que: — desarrollen una estrategia comunitaria sobre la fibromialgia con objeto de que esta patología sea recono cido como enfermedad; — contribuyan a la sensibilización sobre esta patología y faciliten el acceso a la información para profesio nales y pacientes, apoyando las campañas de la UE y nacionales de sensibilización; — alienten a los Estados miembros a mejorar el acceso al diagnóstico y al tratamiento; — promuevan la investigación sobre la fibromialgia mediante los programas de trabajo del Séptimo Programa Marco de Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnológico y futuros programas de investigación; — promuevan el desarrollo de programas para la recopilación de datos sobre la fibromialgia; 2. -
European Parliament Made Simple
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT MADE SIMPLE 2014-2019 The European Parliament Made Simple is produced by the American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (AmCham EU) as a introduction to the workings of the European Parliament for amateurs and experts alike. Production Team Editor and project manager Giovanni Mastrobuono Senior Communications Officer Editorial assistance Alexandrine Gauvin Communications Officer Eli Corso-Phinney Communications Intern The information contained in this publication has been compiled in good faith and is accurate according to the most recent sources available at the time of going to press. Photographs used with the kind permission of the Audiovisual Libraries of the European Commission, Council of the European Union and the European Parliament. First edition, 2014 ISBN: 978-2-9146856-7-2 Printed in Belgium American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (AmCham EU) Avenue des Arts 53, B-1000 Brussels Telephone: +32 (0)2 513 68 92 Fax: +32 (0)2 513 79 28 [email protected] www.amchameu.eu Foreword Susan Danger Managing Director American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union t is with great pleasure that I present AmCham EU’s newest guide, The European Parliament Made Simple. The Lisbon Treaty, signed in 2009, gave the European Parliament greater power in EU Idecision-making and an increased role in selecting and approving the European Commission. As a result, this year’s European election has a greater democratic influence than ever before. With this in mind, AmCham EU has published The European Parliament Made Simple to explain the Parliament’s expanded powers and roles, for both the Brussels policy community and public affairs professionals in the EU and US. -
Der Halbierte Demos
Klaus Höpcke Der halbierte Demos Nach der Europa-Wahl: Parteiensystem delegitimiert? Wie gehen wir mit PDS-Wahlergebnissen um: Erfreut? Nüchtern? Fragen wir: Warum nicht sieben Prozent? TEXTE & ARGUMENTE (Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung in Thüringen) Thüringer Forum für Bildung und Wissenschaft e.V. 2 KLAUS HÖPCKE Von 26,5 Millionen Bürgerinnen und Bürgern der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, die am 13. Juni 2004 an der Wahl der Abgeordneten des Europa-Parlaments teil- genommen haben, was einer Wahlbeteiligung von 43 % entspricht, gaben andert- halb Millionen (genau: 1.579.693) ihre Stimme den auf einer offenen Liste ange- tretenen Kandidatinnen und Kandidaten der PDS. Das ergab einen Anteil von 6,1 % an den abgegebenen 25.780.773 gültigen Stimmen. Damit gehören dem Europäischen Parlament statt bisher sechs künftig sieben Politikerinnen und Politiker an, die das Europa-Wahlprogramm der Partei des Demokratischen Sozialismus vertreten. Es sind dies: Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Helmuth Markov, Gabi Zimmer, Tobias Pflüger, Sahra Wagenknecht, André Brie, Feleknas Uca. Wahlenthaltung einer 57-Prozent-Mehrheit Bevor wir uns den PDS-Wahlergebnissen im einzelnen zuwenden, halten wir ei- nen Augenblick bei der Wahlbeteiligung inne: Eine Mehrheit von 57 % der Wahl- berechtigten hat nicht gewählt. In der Zeitschrift „DeutschlandArchiv“ (Heft 4/2004, Seiten 556–560) wertet Hans-Georg Golz, Bonn, in einem Kommentar unter der Überschrift „Zeit des Abstrafens“ die drastische Wahlenthaltung als das gravierendste Ergebnis der Juni-Wahlen 2004. Damit hat er meines Erachtens recht. Mir scheint aber, aus dieser Tatsache ergeben sich grundsätzlichere Fragen, als er sie stellt. Die Vorstellung von der Legitimität, der politischen Rechtmäßigkeit eines de- mokratischen Staats beruht auf der Annahme, in ihm bestimme das Volk, wer ge- wählt wird und wer nicht; dem gemäß gehe die Staatsgewalt vom Volk aus. -
Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C Tájékoztatások És Közlemények
2006.5.25. HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C 124 E/25 2005. június 7., kedd 11. A kibővült Unió 2007 és 2013 közötti politikai kihívásai és költségvetési eszközei (vita) Jelentés a kibővült Unió 2007 és 2013 közötti politikai kihívásairól és költségvetési eszközeiről [2004/2209(INI)] – A kibővült Unió 2007 és 2013 közötti politikai kihívásaival és költségvetési eszkö- zeivel foglalkozó ideiglenes bizottság. Előadó: Reimer Böge (A6-0153/2005) Reimer Böge előterjeszti a jelentést. Felszólal: Nicolas Schmit (a Tanács soros elnöke) és José Manuel Barroso (a Bizottság elnöke). Felszólal: Véronique De Keyser (az AFET bizottság véleményének előadója), Margrietus van den Berg (a DEVE bizottság véleményének előadója), Pierre Jonckheer (az INTA bizottság véleményének előadója), Enrico Letta (az ECON bizottság véleményének előadója), Jamila Madeira (az EMPL bizottság véleményének előadója), Jutta D. Haug (az ENVI bizottság véleményének előadója), Paul Rübig (az ITRE bizottság véleményének előadója), Phillip Whitehead (az IMCO bizottság véleményének előadója), Etelka Barsi-Pataky (a TRAN bizottság véleményének előadója), Constanze Angela Krehl (a REGI bizottság véleményének előadója), Albert Jan Maat (az AGRI bizottság véleményének előadója), Ruth Hieronymi (a CULT bizottság véleményének előadója), Gérard Deprez (a LIBE bizottság véleményének előadója), Johannes Voggenhuber (az AFCO bizottság véleményének előadója), Ilda Figueiredo (a FEMM bizottság véleményének előadója), Jan Mulder (a CONT bizottság véleményének előadója), Paulo Casaca (a PECH -
European Parliament
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2004 2009 Committee on International Trade INTA_PV(2004)1011_1 MINUTES of the meeting of 11 October 2004, 3.00 pm - 6.30 pm, and 12 October 2004, 9.00 am - 12.30 pm BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 3.15 pm on Monday, 11 October 2004, with Enrique Barón Crespo, chairperson, in the chair. 1. Adoption of draft agenda The draft agenda was adopted. 2. Chairperson's announcements None. 3. Approval of minutes of the meeting of: 29-30 September 2004, Brussels. The adoption of the minutes was postponed. In the presence of the Council and the European Commission 4. The reform of the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector Presentation by representatives of the European Commission (Russell Mildon, Director, DG Agriculture and Jens Schaps, Head of Unit, DG Trade) Speakers: Johan Van Hecke, Margrietus J. van den Berg, Erika Mann, Reimer Böge, Béla Glattfelder, Helmuth Markov, Pierre Jonckheer, Zbigniew Franciszek Zaleski, Jacky Henin and Georgios Papastamkos. PV\543671EN.doc PE 347.258 Or. en EN EN VOTING TIME 5. Calendar of meetings for 2005 Adoption Decision: The Calendar of meetings for 2005 was adopted with 1 vote against and no abstentions. 6. Annual report on arms exports INTA/6/23710 - 2004/2103 (INI) PE 347.135 v01-00 PE 347.219 v01-00 Draftsperson: Jacky Henin Adoption of draft opinion Amendments adopted: 4, 8, 9 modified orally, 10, 12, Oral, 15, 16, 17, 18 Amendments rejected: 2, 3, 5, 7 Amendments falling: 1, 6, 11, 13, 14 Decision: The draft opinion, as amended, was adopted unanimously. -
European Parliament
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 1999 2004 Session document FINAL A5-0444/2002 9 December 2002 REPORT on the Commission White Paper ‘European transport policy for 2010: time to decide’ (COM(2001) 370 – C5-0658/2001 – 2001/2281(COS)) Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism Rapporteur: Juan de Dios Izquierdo Collado RR\484385EN.doc PE 301.855 EN EN PE 301.855 2/31 RR\484385EN.doc EN CONTENTS Page PROCEDURAL PAGE.............................................................................................................. 4 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION ............................................................................................. 5 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT............................................................................................ 17 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, EXTERNAL TRADE, RESEARCH AND ENERGY........................................................................................................................ 21 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND CONSUMER POLICY ............................................................................................................ 26 RR\484385EN.doc 3/31 PE 301.855 EN PROCEDURAL PAGE By letter of 14 September 2001 the Commission forwarded to Parliament its White Paper ‘European transport policy for 2010: time to decide’ (COM(2001) 370 – 2001/2281(COS)). At the sitting of 13 December 2001 the President of Parliament announced that she had referred the White Paper to the Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism as the committee -
European Parliament
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ««« « « « « 1999 « « 2004 ««« Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs PE/V/PV/02-17 MINUTES of the meeting of 4 November 2002, 3 pm - 6.30 pm, and 5 November 2002, 9 am - 12.30 pm and 3 pm - 6.30 pm BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 3.15 pm on Monday, 4 November 2002, with Christa Randzio-Plath, chairwoman, in the chair. 1. Adoption of draft agenda PE 315.25 The draft agenda was adopted. 2. Chairman's announcements: The Chair announced the following events: - 4 November 2002, 6 pm - Delegation meeting with ECOFIN Troika centering on the extension of the Lamfalussy procedure and current legislation on financial services, - 13 November 2002, 2.30 pm - Presentation of the Commission's Autumn Economic Forecasts by Commissioner Pedro SOLBES, immediately following their adoption, - 19 November 2002 in Strasburg - special meeting of the Committee to vote on the KARAS Report on streamlining the annual co-ordination cycles, - 27 November 2002, 3 pm - in the context of the next meeting of the Committee, exchange of views with Commissioner Mario MONTI on current competition issues. PV\475979EN.doc PE 315.029 Or. en EN EN The Chair also informed members present that the Conference of Presidents had decided on 23 October 2002 not to authorise initiative reports on the preparation of the Spring Summit. 3. Any other business There was no other business 4. Approval of minutes of the meetings of: 01 + 02 October 2002 in Brussels PE 315.012 The minutes were approved. 5. Appointment of rapporteurs and draftspersons-Decisions of the co-ordinators' meeting of 22 October 2002 in Strasbourg Regarding the Bourlanges report on the classification and hierarchy of EU acts the Committee approved the co-ordinators' decision to submit two amendments in line with its position on the issue, directly to the Committee on Constitutional Affairs. -
Europolitics
CLIMATE CHANGE ECONOMIC POLICY NATO DEFENCE MEETING EU executive proposes disaster Union struggles for unified stance EU reinforcements in Afghanistan prevention strategy Page 5 on crisis Page 6 for limited time? Page 10 EUROPOLITICS The European affairs daily Tuesday 24 February 2009 N° 3700 37th year FOCUS GENERAL AFFAIRS COUNCIL Five billion euro plan: EU appeals to Decisions delayed until March Israel By Célia Sampol margins of 2009. Six countries had already By Eric van Puyvelde shown reluctance on this point during the The Council of Ministers failed to reach last Ecofin Council (Germany, the United an agreement on ways to finance the €5 Kingdom, Italy, Sweden, the Netherlands The future Israeli government must billion included in the European Commis- and Austria) – arguing that it was not possible relaunch the peace process with the sion’s economic recovery plan or on the final to dip into the margins of the 2008 budget Palestinians, urged the EU foreign min- list of projects to be financed. However, the because that period was already over and that isters at their Council, on 23 February debate continues and decisions have been in order to do that it would be necessary to in Brussels. Things could be rough, postponed until March. revise the financial perspectives. acknowledged Alexandr Vondra, the That is what emerged from the General Czech deputy prime minister and Affairs Council of 23 February in Brussels. SOUNDING OUT PARLIAMENT current Council president. Some are On the actual projects, a small number of But contagion has set in and most member concerned about the attitude of the delegations remain dissatisfied with the latest states now think that this “is not the right path right-of-centre government to be put list put forward by the Commission, which to follow”. -
MEETING of the COSAC CHAIRPERSONS 21-22 January 2018, Sofia, Bulgaria DRAFT PROGRAMME As of 10.01.2018 Sunday, 21 January 2018 1
MEETING OF THE COSAC CHAIRPERSONS 21-22 January 2018, Sofia, Bulgaria DRAFT PROGRAMME as of 10.01.2018 Sunday, 21 January 2018 14:00 – 19:00 Arrival of delegations and registration for the meeting at the hotels Meeting of the Presidential Troika of COSAC 17:30 Departure by bus from the hotels 18:00 – 19:00 Meeting of the Presidential Troika Venue: National Assembly, “Zapad” Hall, 2 Narodno Sabranie sq. 1169 Sofia, Bulgaria 19:00 Departure for the dinner 17:30 Departure by bus from the hotels to the National History Museum 18:00 – 19:00 Visit of National History Museum Venue: 16 Vitoshko Lale Str., 1618 Sofia, Bulgaria 19:00 Departure by bus from the National History Museum to the dinner venue 19:30 Dinner at Boyana Residence hosted by Mr. Kristian VIGENIN, Chairman of the Committee on European Affairs and Oversight of the European Funds, National Assembly of the Republic of Bulgaria Venue: Boyana Residence, 16 Vitoshko Lale Str., 1618 Sofia, Bulgaria 22:30 Return to the hotels by bus 1 Monday, 22 January 2018 8:00 Departure by bus from the hotels to the conference venue Venue: NDK Congress Centre Sofia, Hall “3”, “Bulgaria" Square 1 1463 Sofia, Bulgaria 8:30 – 8:45 Opening of the meeting Welcome address by Ms. Tsveta KARAYANCHEVA, President of the National Assembly of the Republic of Bulgaria Introductory remarks by Mr. Kristian VIGENIN, Chair of the Committee on European Affairs and Oversight of the European Funds, National Assembly of the Republic of Bulgaria Adoption of the agenda 8:45 – 9:15 Procedural issues and miscellaneous matters - Briefing on the results of the Presidential Troika of COSAC - Draft agenda of the LIX COSAC - Outline of the 29th Bi-Annual Report of COSAC - Letters received by the Presidency - Procedural issues Debate 9:15 – 10:15 Session 1: Priorities of the Bulgarian Presidency of the Council of the EU Keynote speaker: Mrs. -
Visit Under Eu Presidency Bulgarian Visit for the European Presidency
FMA BULLETIN - 64 19 VISIT UNDER EU PRESIDENCY BULGARIAN VISIT FOR THE EUROPEAN PRESIDENCY This trip was for the former members combined with imposing communist politics until’ now. of the EP led by our Brigitte (not architecture make up the grand I mustn’t forget between all the Macron or Bardot) but Langenhagen. Parliament Buildings, with spacious debates and culture Bulgaria is The group consisted of 19 former extra wide corridors. All the buildings famous for its cooking and wines. members from the UK, France, are hung with interesting paintings We were spoilt throughout. Germany, Bulgaria, Netherlands, of high quality from different The final day we visited the Military Spain, Czech Republic, Finland, periods and are well worth a visit Academy, founded in 1912. and Poland from 5 different in themselves. We should not The surrounding park with political parties. forget that the EP has a very fine magnificent trees a hallmark of It was a particularly moving visit international collection of art too, Tsar Ferdinand as in Exinograd and for me. I first went to Bulgaria well worth a visit. Varna. He loved nature. Prince campaigning for the first free Enlivened debate ensued the Ferdinand of Coburg came to the elections after the Berlin Wall came Bulgarian Foreign and European throne in 1886 following Prince down, then as an official observer Affairs committees, with the Chairs Alexander of Battenberg, with the in my role as Vice-President of the Ms Dzhema Grozdanova and influence of his mother, the daughter Bulgarian Delegation in the EP. I Mr Kristian Vigenin, as well as with of the last King of France he ruled was guided by Stefan Tavrov, future the Bulgarian Vice-President Ms Iliana Bulgaria for over 30 years.