DOCSLIB.ORG

I MONUMENTA and HISTORIOGRAPHICAL METHOD in LIVY's AB URBE CONDITA by TYLER ANDREW DENTON B.A., University of Tennessee, 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

i MONUMENTA AND HISTORIOGRAPHICAL METHOD IN LIVY’S AB URBE CONDITA by TYLER ANDREW DENTON B.A., University of Tennessee, 2012 M.A., University of Kentucky, 2014 A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Classics 2019 ii This thesis entitled: Monumenta and Historiographical Method in Livy’s Ab Urbe Condita written by Tyler Andrew Denton has been approved for the Department of Classics Jackie Elliott, Associate Professor Carole Newlands, Professor Date The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above-mentioned discipline. iii Denton, Tyler Andrew (Ph.D, Classics) Monumenta and Historiographical Method in Livy’s Ab Urbe Condita Thesis Directed by Associate Professor Jackie Elliott This project examines the Latin term monumentum, particularly as it appears in Titus Livy’s history of Rome but also in other Latin authors as points with which Livy’s depiction of monumenta can be compared. In his Preface, Livy refers to his own work as a monumentum (praef. 10) in so far as it has the capacity to present models (exempla) from the past to the readers of the history. Other instances of monumentum, however, in the Ab Urbe Condita become problematic in the course of the narrative, especially in their use as source material for history-writing: physical structures can be destroyed, appropriated, or confused; and written works as monumenta (a valence that the term often has in Latin) can suffer from manipulation and bias for individualistic and familial aggrandizement. Monumenta—both in the conception of the term and in their general depictions in Latin literature—are ideally thought to be strong points of contact with the past and particularly valuable evidence for uncovering that past. But Livy’s depiction does not attribute to them a privileged status in preserving and conveying information about the past. Monumenta in practice provide no clearer or more secure material than traditionally less trustworthy sources, such as oral tradition. In his depiction of monumenta and his connection of the term with statements programmatic for the history, Livy creates an historiographical workshop by which his readers can better understand the nature of history- writing in the Roman world as well as the larger society that it reflects. I argue, thereby, that Livy reveals his perspective on traditional power politics in the Roman world. Though he clearly admires aspects of Rome and its past, Livy criticizes the factionalism and self-serving competition that poses such a significant threat to the state. iv To R.E.M. and Sophie, for love, patience, encouragement, and humor throughout the process. v CONTENT CHAPTERS I. Introduction……………………………………………………………1 Historical monumenta…………………………………………………5 Memory Studies……………………………………………………….7 Reading Livy through Livy……………………………………………9 To the detriment of all…………………………………………………10 Scipio's end and his monumental afterlife…………………………….13 Summary of the chapters ahead……………………………………….16 II. Monumenta in Context…………………………………………………19 Ancient definitions of the term monumentum………………………….21 Types of monumenta……………………………………………………41 Funerary monumenta and the principle of visibility……………………45 Time, monumenta, and the role of posterity……………………………55 The eternality of monumenta and their guarantee of reputation…………63 The temples of Jupiter Optimus Maximus………………………………70 Livy and the eternity of monumenta…………………………………….76 Conclusion………………………………………………………………78 III. Monumenta and the Written Word………………………………………80 Lasting impressions: monumenta and disembodiment………………….82 Monumental writing…………………………………………………….88 A literary monumentum: an example from Cato’s Origines……………100 Poetic monumenta……………………………………………………….103 Conclusion………………………………………………………………115 IV. A New Monumentum……………………………………………………119 A visitor in Rome……………………………………………………….122 Monumenta in the context of Livy’s preface……………………………128 Inlustre monumentum and Livy’s preface………………………………132 Rome at centerstage…………………………………………………….138 Monumentum sine nomine………………………………………………144 Author and reader……………………………………………………….148 Monumenta and corruptibility……………………………………………150 “Neither to affirm nor refute”……………………………………………155 Livy and Tacitus on the conflagrations of Rome…………………………159 Fabulae in the Ab Urbe Condita…………………………………………163 vi Fabula in context………………………………………………………167 Fama, fabula, and multiplicity…………………………………………179 The Lacūs Curtii……………………………………………………….182 Conclusion………………………………………………………………187 V. Monumenta in Practice…………………………………………………190 Reconstructing the present through the past……………………………192 The city as monumentum……………………………………………….194 A city of the imagination: Camillus’ survey of Rome…………………199 Camillus as a counter to self-aggrandizement………………………….202 Public vs. private monumenta………………………………………….204 Tituli and falsi tituli…………………………………………………….210 Papirius Cursor and Fabius Rullianus: an aristocratic feud……………217 Livy and other writers………………………………………………….226 Conclusion………………………………………………………………230 VI. Conclusion………………………………………………………………233 Livy “Pompeianus”………………………………………………………234 BIBLIOGRAPHY I. Reference Works…………………………………………………………240 II. Further Editions Used……………………………………………………241 III. Works Cited………………………………………………………………242 1 I. Introduction In this study, I examine from an historiographical stance the conception, use, and referents of the term monumentum in Livy’s Ab Urbe Condita.1 In this process, I focus on two different but complementary aspects: first, Livy’s use of the term monumentum within the text as a lens through which his historiographical method can be understood; second, Livy’s commentary on Roman culture as it is represented in various instantiations of the term monumentum, both in their internal impact on the narrative and in their reflection of the external society in which the Ab Urbe Condita is written and to which it is presented. The term appears a significant number of times in the extant portions of Livy,2 but not so many that it can be dismissed as a natural accumulation of language or as mere happenstance. Further, monumentum often appears in key passages—such as prefatory or closural sections—or is connected with those key passages through verbal parallels or thematic commonality. It makes a certain amount of sense that a work focused on representing the past to an audience in the present would seek tangible or, at least, perceivable points of contact with that past. The further back in time the story goes, the greater the need may seem to be for these points 1 In order to emphasize the importance of monumentum as a term and concept with particular cultural implications— as well as to preserve the complex dimensions of the term—I use the Latin term throughout. All translations are my own. 2 Monumentum in some form appears at least 45 times. The passages are: praef. 6, 10; 1.12.6, 13.5, 36.5, 45.4, 48.7, 55.1; 2.33.9, 40.12; 4.7.10, 10.6, 16.1, 24.3; 5.30.2, 52.1; 6.1.2, 20.12, 28.6, 29.9; 7.3.7, 21.6; 8.11.16, 40.5; 9.18.7; 10.2.15, 15.5; 23.20.3; 25.39.17; 26.24.14, 41.12; 29.37.7; 30.28.5; 31.29.11, 30.7; 37.6.6; 38.53.8, 56.3-5 (four times), 57.8; 39.37.16, 40.7; 45.27.11, 43.4 (see also per. 38, 41, 140, and F 42 = Sen. de Tranq. 9). According to some manuscripts, the term also appears at 1.47.6 and 21.4.2. No editor has suggested monumento for the textual momento at 2.7.10. But the context fits for the term monumentum (the passage pertains to a proposed house on the Velia; see also Ch. 3 for the connection between monumentum and fama), and momentum and monumentum are commonly confused in scribal transmission (see Ch. 1). A similar argument may apply to 1.33.7 (munimentum). Though digital word searches have largely superseded concordances, Packard remains useful in its linear collection and presentation. 2 of contact, and the term certainly is more prevalent in the earlier portions of the history (in so far as is represented in the surviving text, anyways).3 But it is notable that all of those earliest monumenta have vanished with time, been replaced, or undergone dramatic change to the point that they no longer clearly fulfil the original, memorial function for which they were made. In his Preface, Livy apparently laments the reliance of the earliest portions of his history on poetic and mythical accounts (poeticis … fabulis) rather than on history’s secure monumenta (incorruptis rerum gestarum monumentis, 6; discussed further in Ch. 3). Why, then, does the first book contain more uses of the term monumentum than any other?4 And, as a corollary, why do fabulae continue to play such a large role in narrating Rome’s past beyond those earliest periods? Livy’s monumenta often become problematic in the course of his narrative, in that they do not actually meet the function for which they exist; their point of commemoration is cast into doubt or contradicted; or their status as privileged preservers of the past is challenged in cross- reference with other portions of the text. I argue that Livy’s depiction of monumenta as inconsistent and indeterminate is a conscious and loaded one: the historian represents disconnect and fluctuation between general conceptions of monumenta—as they are characterized by other writers—and the ones depicted in the narrative. In so doing, he creates a dialogic space in which reader and author can negotiate and better understand the nature of Roman history as well as the larger culture itself, a collective past and identity that has traditionally been represented through commemorative artefacts. 3 See Bonfante 1998. Bonfante points out that written documents become more prevalent than material monumenta in the later books (486 n. 27). 4 The phrase res gestae in Livy is also not an uncomplicated one. See, esp., Ch. 4 on 8.40.4-5 and the distinction of fama rerum gestarum and memoria rerum gestarum. 3 The topic is by no means untrodden ground, and the primary evidence, by nature of the specific focus on a term, has been discussed previously;5 my contribution is rather one of nuance than novelty.
Recommended publications
  • From Prometheus to Pistorius: a Genaelogy of Physical Ability

    From Prometheus to Pistorius: a Genaelogy of Physical Ability

    FROM PROMETHEUS TO PISTORIUS: A GENAELOGY OF PHYSICAL ABILITY by Stephanie J. Cork A thesis submitted to the Department of Sociology In conformity with the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada (September, 2011) Copyright ©Stephanie J. Cork, 2011 Abstract (Fragile Frames + Monstrosities)ModernWar + (Flagged Bodies + Cyborgs)PostmodernWar = dis-AbilityCyborged ii Acknowledgements A huge thank you goes out to: my friends, colleagues, office neighbours, mentors, family, defence committee, readers, editors and Steve. Thank you, also, to the Canadian and American troops as well as Paralympic athletes, Oscar Pistorius and Aimee Mullins for their inspiration, sorry, I have borrowed your stories to perpetuate my own academic success. Thanks also to Louise Bark for her endless patience and kindness, as well as a pint (or three!) at Ben’s Pub. Anne and Wendy and especially Michelle: you are lifesavers! Finally, my eternal gratitude to the: “greatest man alive,” Dr. Rob Beamish (Scott Mason 2011). iii Table of Contents Abstract............................................................................................................................................. i Acknowledgements......................................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents............................................................................................................................ iv Chapter 1: Introduction.....................................................................................................................1
  • The Burial of the Urban Poor in Italy in the Late Republic and Early Empire

    The Burial of the Urban Poor in Italy in the Late Republic and Early Empire

    Death, disposal and the destitute: The burial of the urban poor in Italy in the late Republic and early Empire Emma-Jayne Graham Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Archaeology University of Sheffield December 2004 IMAGING SERVICES NORTH Boston Spa, Wetherby West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ www.bl.uk The following have been excluded from this digital copy at the request of the university: Fig 12 on page 24 Fig 16 on page 61 Fig 24 on page 162 Fig 25 on page 163 Fig 26 on page 164 Fig 28 on page 168 Fig 30on page 170 Fig 31 on page 173 Abstract Recent studies of Roman funerary practices have demonstrated that these activities were a vital component of urban social and religious processes. These investigations have, however, largely privileged the importance of these activities to the upper levels of society. Attempts to examine the responses of the lower classes to death, and its consequent demands for disposal and commemoration, have focused on the activities of freedmen and slaves anxious to establish or maintain their social position. The free poor, living on the edge of subsistence, are often disregarded and believed to have been unceremoniously discarded within anonymous mass graves (puticuli) such as those discovered at Rome by Lanciani in the late nineteenth century. This thesis re-examines the archaeological and historical evidence for the funerary practices of the urban poor in Italy within their appropriate social, legal and religious context. The thesis attempts to demonstrate that the desire for commemoration and the need to provide legitimate burial were strong at all social levels and linked to several factors common to all social strata.
  • Hic Tacitus Lapis: Voice, Audience, and Space in Early Roman Verse-Epitaphs

    Hic Tacitus Lapis: Voice, Audience, and Space in Early Roman Verse-Epitaphs

    HIC TACITUS LAPIS: VOICE, AUDIENCE, AND SPACE IN EARLY ROMAN VERSE-EPITAPHS A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Allison Catherine Boex August 2014 © 2014 Allison Catherine Boex HIC TACITUS LAPIS: VOICE, AUDIENCE AND, SPACE IN EARLY ROMAN VERSE-EPITAPHS Allison Catherine Boex, Ph. D. Cornell University 2014 This dissertation sets out to investigate the content, role, and effects of ancient Roman grave-inscriptions; I argue that Roman gravestones and their inscriptions were intended to serve as metonymic markers, stand-ins for their deceased subjects in the land of the living, allowing the dead to engage with the living and the living with the dead. As many previous studies of Roman grave-inscriptions have been undermined by the fact that their authors attempt to address the entire body of Roman epitaphs (a corpus too large and diverse to allow productive study of its entirety), this dissertation focuses on a smaller corpus, the forty-nine extant verse-inscriptions generally assigned to the Roman Republic. In investigating these epitaphs, I focus on the effects of the reading-act and the related issues of voice, audience, and space; my approach is informed by the works of Svenbro (1993) and Vallette-Cagnac (1997) on the reading- act in ancient Greece and Rome respectively, Sourvinou-Inwood’s (1995) study of voice in ancient Greek epitaphs, and Lowrie’s (2006) work on deixis and its effects on the reader’s perception of presence and absence. I argue that the reading-act of the passer-by activates a depiction of the deceased’s life, tied to the stone as the metonymic marker of the deceased; it is through this depiction that the figure of the deceased can engage, implicitly and explicitly, with the living upon each reading of the inscription.
  • A New Perspective on the Early Roman Dictatorship, 501-300 B.C

    A New Perspective on the Early Roman Dictatorship, 501-300 B.C

    A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON THE EARLY ROMAN DICTATORSHIP, 501-300 B.C. BY Jeffrey A. Easton Submitted to the graduate degree program in Classics and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master’s of Arts. Anthony Corbeill Chairperson Committee Members Tara Welch Carolyn Nelson Date defended: April 26, 2010 The Thesis Committee for Jeffrey A. Easton certifies that this is the approved Version of the following thesis: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON THE EARLY ROMAN DICTATORSHIP, 501-300 B.C. Committee: Anthony Corbeill Chairperson Tara Welch Carolyn Nelson Date approved: April 27, 2010 ii Page left intentionally blank. iii ABSTRACT According to sources writing during the late Republic, Roman dictators exercised supreme authority over all other magistrates in the Roman polity for the duration of their term. Modern scholars have followed this traditional paradigm. A close reading of narratives describing early dictatorships and an analysis of ancient epigraphic evidence, however, reveal inconsistencies in the traditional model. The purpose of this thesis is to introduce a new model of the early Roman dictatorship that is based upon a reexamination of the evidence for the nature of dictatorial imperium and the relationship between consuls and dictators in the period 501-300 BC. Originally, dictators functioned as ad hoc magistrates, were equipped with standard consular imperium, and, above all, were intended to supplement consuls. Furthermore, I demonstrate that Sulla’s dictatorship, a new and genuinely absolute form of the office introduced in the 80s BC, inspired subsequent late Republican perceptions of an autocratic dictatorship.
  • Extracting Two Thousand Years of Latin from a Million Book Library

    Extracting Two Thousand Years of Latin from a Million Book Library

    Extracting Two Thousand Years of Latin from a Million Book Library David Bamman The Perseus Project, Tufts University and David Smith Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts-Amherst With the rise of large open digitization projects such as the Internet Archive and Google Books, we are witnessing an explosive growth in the number of source texts becoming available to re- searchers in historical languages. The Internet Archive alone contains over 27,014 texts catalogued as Latin, including classical prose and poetry written under the Roman Empire, ecclesiastical trea- tises from the Middle Ages, and dissertations from 19th-century Germany written { in Latin { on the philosophy of Hegel. At one billion words, this collection eclipses the extant corpus of Classical Latin by several orders of magnitude. In addition, the much larger collection of books in English, German, French, and other languages already scanned contains unknown numbers of translations for many Latin books, or parts of books. The sheer scale of this collection offers a broad vista of new research questions, and we focus here on both the opportunities and challenges of computing over such a large space of heterogeneous texts. The works in this massive collection do not constitute a finely curated (or much less balanced) corpus of Latin; it is, instead, simply all the Latin that can be extracted, and in its reach of twenty-one centuries (from ca. 200 BCE to 1922 CE) arguably spans the greatest historical distance of any major textual collection today. While we might hope that the size and historical reach of this collection can eventually offer insight into grand questions such as the evolution of a language over both time and space, we must contend as well with the noise inherent in a corpus that has been assembled with minimal human intervention.
  • Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C

    Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 Men at Work: Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C. Seth G. Bernard University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Bernard, Seth G., "Men at Work: Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C." (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 492. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/492 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/492 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Men at Work: Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C. Abstract MEN AT WORK: PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION, LABOR, AND SOCIETY AT MID-REPUBLICAN ROME, 390-168 B.C. Seth G. Bernard C. Brian Rose, Supervisor of Dissertation This dissertation investigates how Rome organized and paid for the considerable amount of labor that went into the physical transformation of the Middle Republican city. In particular, it considers the role played by the cost of public construction in the socioeconomic history of the period, here defined as 390 to 168 B.C. During the Middle Republic period, Rome expanded its dominion first over Italy and then over the Mediterranean. As it developed into the political and economic capital of its world, the city itself went through transformative change, recognizable in a great deal of new public infrastructure.
  • Exemplarity in Roman Culture: the Cases of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia Author(S): Matthew B

    Exemplarity in Roman Culture: the Cases of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia Author(S): Matthew B

    Exemplarity in Roman Culture: The Cases of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia Author(s): Matthew B. Roller Source: Classical Philology, Vol. 99, No. 1 (January 2004), pp. 1-56 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/423674 . Accessed: 08/04/2011 17:40 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at . http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=ucpress. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Classical Philology. http://www.jstor.org EXEMPLARITY IN ROMAN CULTURE: THE CASES OF HORATIUS COCLES AND CLOELIA matthew b.
  • Burial Customs and the Pollution of Death in Ancient Rome BURIAL CUSTOMS and the POLLUTION of DEATH in ANCIENT ROME: PROCEDURES and PARADOXES

    Burial Customs and the Pollution of Death in Ancient Rome BURIAL CUSTOMS and the POLLUTION of DEATH in ANCIENT ROME: PROCEDURES and PARADOXES

    Burial customs and the pollution of death in ancient Rome BURIAL CUSTOMS AND THE POLLUTION OF DEATH IN ANCIENT ROME: PROCEDURES AND PARADOXES ABSTRACT The Roman attitude towards the dead in the period spanning the end of the Republic and the high point of the Empire was determined mainly by religious views on the (im)mortality of the soul and the concept of the “pollution of death”. Contamina- tion through contact with the dead was thought to affect interpersonal relationships, interfere with official duties and prevent contact with the gods. However, considera- tions of hygiene relating to possible physical contamination also played a role. In this study the traditions relating to the correct preparation of the body and the sub- sequent funerary procedures leading up to inhumation or incineration are reviewed and the influence of social status is considered. Obvious paradoxes in the Roman at- titude towards the dead are discussed, e.g. the contrast between the respect for the recently departed on the one hand, and the condoning of brutal executions and public blood sports on the other. These paradoxes can largely be explained as reflecting the very practical policies of legislators and priests for whom considerations of hygiene were a higher priority than cultural/religious views. 1. INTRODUCTION The Roman approach to disposing of the dead in the Republican era and the early Empire (the period from approximately 250 BC to AD 250) was determined in part by diverse cultural/religious beliefs in respect of the continued existence of the soul after death and the con- cept of the “pollution of death”.
  • The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC – AD 476)

    The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC – AD 476)

    Impact of Empire 6 IMEM-6-deBlois_CS2.indd i 5-4-2007 8:35:52 Impact of Empire Editorial Board of the series Impact of Empire (= Management Team of the Network Impact of Empire) Lukas de Blois, Angelos Chaniotis Ségolène Demougin, Olivier Hekster, Gerda de Kleijn Luuk de Ligt, Elio Lo Cascio, Michael Peachin John Rich, and Christian Witschel Executive Secretariat of the Series and the Network Lukas de Blois, Olivier Hekster Gerda de Kleijn and John Rich Radboud University of Nijmegen, Erasmusplein 1, P.O. Box 9103, 6500 HD Nijmegen, The Netherlands E-mail addresses: [email protected] and [email protected] Academic Board of the International Network Impact of Empire geza alföldy – stéphane benoist – anthony birley christer bruun – john drinkwater – werner eck – peter funke andrea giardina – johannes hahn – fik meijer – onno van nijf marie-thérèse raepsaet-charlier – john richardson bert van der spek – richard talbert – willem zwalve VOLUME 6 IMEM-6-deBlois_CS2.indd ii 5-4-2007 8:35:52 The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC – AD 476) Economic, Social, Political, Religious and Cultural Aspects Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire (Roman Empire, 200 B.C. – A.D. 476) Capri, March 29 – April 2, 2005 Edited by Lukas de Blois & Elio Lo Cascio With the Aid of Olivier Hekster & Gerda de Kleijn LEIDEN • BOSTON 2007 This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
  • The Female Body in Latin Love Poetry

    The Female Body in Latin Love Poetry

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Carolina Digital Repository The Female Body in Latin Love Poetry Erika Zimmermann Damer A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Classics. Chapel Hill 2010 Approved by: Sharon James, advisor. James O’Hara, reader. Alison Keith, reader. Paul Allen Miller, reader. Eric Downing, reader. i © 2010 Erika Zimmermann Damer ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT ERIKA ZIMMERMANN DAMER: The Female Body in Latin Love Poetry (Under the direction of Sharon James) This dissertation seeks to rethink the female body in Latin love elegy in its aesthetic and political significance, and argues that the sexualized body creates poetic subjectivity. It juxtaposes close readings of the elegies of Tibullus, Propertius, and Ovid alongside contemporary theorizations of the female body found in Irigaray, Kristeva, and Grosz. By expanding critical focus to encompass all the women of elegy, this dissertation demonstrates a surprising ambivalence towards the female body in a genre that claims to celebrate female beauty, and offers a new view of elegy’s role within Roman conceptions of gender, sexuality, bodies, and empire. Chapter one offers a brief introduction to contemporary feminist theories of the body as well as an overview of critical literature on the elegiac body. Chapter two examines Lucretius’ diatribe against love, Horace Epodes 8 and 12, and the Augustan marital legislation as major background for elegy’s female body.
  • Augustus' Memory Program

    Augustus' Memory Program

    Augustus’ memory program: Augustus as director of history Freek Mommers, F.A.J. S4228421 Summary: Chapter 1: Introduction 2 Chapter 2: Augustus’ troubling past 7 Chapter 3: Commemoration through ceremonies and festivals 11 Chapter 4: Commemoration through literature and inscriptions 20 Chapter 5: Commemoration through monuments 29 Chapter 6: Conclusion 35 Bibliography 36 1 Introduction Augustus is one of the most studied Roman emperors in modern literature but a lot of the period is still unknown or debated.1 The image of Augustus is usually dominated by his most successful years as princeps of Rome.2 Augustus represented himself as an example and as a protector of order, morals and peace.3 The civil war between Augustus and Anthony however was a period filled with chaos and terror. In times of war it was close to impossible to proceed in a moral and peaceful way. Augustus’ claims as an example of order and good morals would obviously be damaged by his troubling past. Therefore the memory of the civil war against Anthony culminating in the battle of Actium in 31 B.C. needed some conscious adaptations for Augustus’ later representation. The now well known history and literature of the civil war are mostly written in an Augustan perspective, a history of the winner. This thesis will try to answer the following question: How did Augustus adapt the memory of his troubling past of his civil war against Anthony in his commemoration practices? The civil war and the decisive battle of Actium play important but controversial roles in Augustan commemoration. Details of the civil war often were deliberately camouflaged or concealed in Augustan sources.
  • The Roman Army's Emergence from Its Italian Origins

    The Roman Army's Emergence from Its Italian Origins

    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Carolina Digital Repository THE ROMAN ARMY’S EMERGENCE FROM ITS ITALIAN ORIGINS Patrick Alan Kent A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2012 Approved by: Richard Talbert Nathan Rosenstein Daniel Gargola Fred Naiden Wayne Lee ABSTRACT PATRICK ALAN KENT: The Roman Army’s Emergence from its Italian Origins (Under the direction of Prof. Richard Talbert) Roman armies in the 4 th century and earlier resembled other Italian armies of the day. By using what limited sources are available concerning early Italian warfare, it is possible to reinterpret the history of the Republic through the changing relationship of the Romans and their Italian allies. An important aspect of early Italian warfare was military cooperation, facilitated by overlapping bonds of formal and informal relationships between communities and individuals. However, there was little in the way of organized allied contingents. Over the 3 rd century and culminating in the Second Punic War, the Romans organized their Italian allies into large conglomerate units that were placed under Roman officers. At the same time, the Romans generally took more direct control of the military resources of their allies as idea of military obligation developed. The integration and subordination of the Italians under increasing Roman domination fundamentally altered their relationships. In the 2 nd century the result was a growing feeling of discontent among the Italians with their position.