DOCSLIB.ORG

Evolution of a Global Military and Civilian Telemedicine Network for the 21St Century: Near Future on Demand, Space Based Delivery of Multimedia Services

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evolution of a Global Military and Civilian Telemedicine Network for the 21St Century: Near Future on Demand, Space Based Delivery of Multimedia Services 48-l Evolution of a Global Military and Civilian Telemedicine Network for the 21st Century: Near Future on Demand, Space Based Delivery of Multimedia Services John A. Evans, Special Advisor MILSATCOM Command and Control Systems Electronic SystemsCenter 50 Grifiss Street Hanscom AFB, MA 01731-1620, USA Frank Davidson, JD, DHL (Hon.), Co-Founder, Channel Tunnel Study Group Advisor, MIT Macro-Engineering ResearchGroup; Vice-Chancellor, The American Society for Macro-Engineering; and Member of the Board of Directors, The International Association of Macro-Engineering Societies Jay Sanders, MD, President American Telemedicine Association; and former Eminent Scholar of Telemedicine at the Medical College of Georgia; and founder and President of The Global Telemedicine Group Lieutenant General Thomas G. Mclnerney, USAF (Retired), President and CEO Business Executives for National Security; former Assistant Vice Chief of Staff of the US Air Force; and former Director of the NationaYDefense Performance Review William T. Brandon The MITRE Corporation Bedford, Massachusetts Abstract Lockard M. Row Advisor in Telemedicine The Medical Defense Performance Review Mont Vernon, New Hampshire (MDPR) was establishedin 1993 to help “reinvent” how health care is provided to the US military ser- vicemen and their dependents. One of the MDPR initiatives has been to rapidly insert video confer- encing, telemanagement and telemedicine tech- nologies to improve the quality and reduce the costs Paper presented at the AGARD AMP Symposium on “Aeromedical Support Issues in Contingency Operations”, held in Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 29 September - I October 1997, and published in CP-599. 48-2 of delivering that care from major and minor medi- adapt these kinds of networks to bring about cal treatment facilities, to wherever the need ex- healthier military and civilian communities. ists, e.g., to patient homes and to remote military communities. The technologies and the processes 19 Introduction now being reinvented have the potential to pro- vide excellent access to quality health care any- We are pleased to be here today at the Aerospace time, anywhere. Medical Panel Symposium. This paper updates our earlier work investigating the application of A major over arching issue is the need to facilitate video conferencing, telemanagementand telemedi- the evolution of high quality, financially self-sus- tine technologies to improve accessto health care, taining telemedical services. An earlier paper’ to improve the quality of care, and to reduce the provided an overview of the medical initiative of cost of health care in the military. We believe these the National Performance Review which stressed technologies have direct application to the prob- the initial testbed and initial interregional telem- lems that will be faced in the future to provide anagement deployment efforts. quality health care at reasonable, i.e., sustainable, cost. Secondly, this paper retrospectively synthe- This paper stressesthe more recent intraregional sizes critical success factors and projects future telemanagementand telemedicine efforts and syn- directions with the assistanceof the coauthors. thesizes key successfactors essential for evolving self-sustaining global telemanagement and tele- The opinions expressed are those of the authors medicine networks for the twenty-first century. and do not reflect the policy of the United States Finally, future directions are proposed which could Air Force. 48-3 20 Proiect Backpround Collaboration of the MDPR with the joint military and civilian community has been paramount U.S. Vice PresidentAl Gore establisheda National throughout the four years of the project. The Performance Review, the purpose of which is “to MDPR has been working with the Army Medical reinvent government*’both to improve government Advanced Technology Management Office , the services and to reduce the cost of providing these Naval Medical Information Center and the Office services2 Under the sponsorship of the National / of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health DefensePerformance Review, the Medical Defense Affairs to improve access to health care, to im- Performance Review was established under Lieu- prove the quality of health care, and to reduce the tenant General Thomas McInerney who brought cost of health care -goals that must be met in an in Brigadier General PeterHoffman to direct a two- environment of reduced resources in the military pronged effort. and civilian health care communities. Much of the current work being done by these and support- One prong of the effort was focused on develop- ing organizationswas presentedat the first National ing a medical provider workstation. This proto- Forum on Military Telemedicine in March of 199S4 type is being developed at Scott AFB, and is docu- and at the Telemedicine 2000 conference held in mented separately.3 June 1995.s An overview was presentedto a meet- ing of NATO Partnersfor Peacein September1995. The other prong of the effort was conceived as a And, more recently an overview was presented at joint civilian and military initiative with the Of- this summer’s Global Telemedicine and Federal fice of the Air Force Surgeon General as the ex- Technologies symposium at Williamsburg, VAn6 ecutive agent. This focused on a user-evaluated and user-guided, phased deployment of computer Because the ability to outsource military medical communication networks emphasizing group and services on a global basis has always been envi- desktop voice, data, image and video conferenc- sioned,718we have concurrentIy sought opportu- ing to support telemanagement and telemedicine. nities to work with best-of-breed military and ci- Concurrently, emphasis was given to inserting vilian leaders and facilities, ultimately contribut- high-value-added reengineered management and ing to healthier military and civilian communi- clinical processes based on collaborative experi- ties.9*10 For instance, from the beginning we ences with best-of-breed leaders of civilian tele- sought the guidance of and collaborated with best- medicine and newly-empowered military users of of-breed leaders in teIemedicine, such as Dr. Jay telemedicine. Sandersat the Medical School of Georgia, currently President of the American Telemedicine Associa- Thesebroad-based MDPR efforts recently received tion and coauthor of this paper. We collaborated the Vice President Gore Hammer Award for excel- with Jay at the First Congress of the Atlantic Rim lence in reengineering. This paper focuses on the in Boston, 1994.11.12,13This telemedicine pre- emergence of the network and its reengineered sentation and demonstration reported on the pio- managementand clinical processeswhich are cur- neering efforts of the US Army (Dr. Ed Gomez, rently being inserted and evolved worldwide. (See Walter Reed) and demonstrated a US Navy-devel- Figure 1, “MDPR Worldwide Operating Loca- oped, Joint Chiefs of Staff award-winning Multi- tions”) lingual Translator (Commander Lee Morin, Naval Medical Research Institute). 48-4 This collaborative activity has matured to the point between two or more locations. Most early suc- where joint presentations have been delivered at cessful systems were installed in government and Monaco, November 1995,t4315at the 100th Bos- large corporation conference facilities. The wid- ton Marathon, July 199616and at the Global Tele- ening acceptanceof this VTC technology has low- medicine and Federal Technologies Symposium at ered the cost of working and collaborating together Williamsburg, VA, July 1996.l7 Another milestone on common projects and issues from remote sites. was reached when a Collaborative Research and Development Agreement was struck between The fundamental components of video conferenc- Lahey Hitchcock Clinic and the Electronic Sys- ing systems are the basic video and audio capa- tems Center in July 1996.18 This agreement will bilities. Other audio-video capabilities are typi- enable the military medical regions within the US cally integrated into corporate VTC-equipped con- and Europe to import and leverage medical exper- ference rooms. These include graphic display sys- tise and reengineered clinical processes in ex- tems such as overheadviewgraphs and 35 mm slide change for providing Lahey with expertise in the projectors. Auxiliary video sources such as video deployment of global computer communication cassetterecorders and players as well as facsimile infrastructure. capabilities for the exchange of printed material are often also included. Thus, the MDPR initiative we focused on was in- tended: 1) to improve the medical management, Video conferencing technology is now being ex- acquisition, operational and support processes tended to the desktop in personal computer sys- within the Air Force medical community; 2) to tems. This has made the full range of capabilities promote collaboration among the other military found on personal computer systems (office auto- services, NATO, the United Nations, other coali- mation, engineering, computing, file transfer and tion partners, and the civilian health care commu- networking) inherent componentsof desktop video nities. This top-down and outreach approach has conferencing systems. Important among theseca- successfully extended the enabling technology pabilities is the ability to share computer applica- across regional medical organizations to evolve tions, allowing conference participants to work on incrementaIly to a true telemedicine system serv- a shared electronic copy of documents such as
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ttu Minbdm 000301.Pdf
    TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY Texas Tech is a state-supported, multipurpose university of over 23,000 students enrolled in six colleges-Agricultural Sciences, Arts and Sciences, Business Administration, Education, Engineering, and Home Economics- and two schools-the Graduate School and the School of Law. The_Texas Tech Health Sciences Center-a separate institution- and the Museum share the Lubbock campus with the University. As is necessary for an educational institution of its scope and purposes, Texas Tech operates in several locations. Beyond its 1,839-acre Lubbock campus- all in one tract-the University operates a 13,822-acre agricultural and biological laboratory through the Texas Tech University Center at Amarillo. Under development are other agricultural research and teaching facilities in Lubbock County and in Terry County. As a part of its medical role, the Health Sciences Center has in various stages of development three Regional academic Health Centers: in Amarillo, in El Paso, and in Odessa-Midland. The Texas Tech University Center at Junction, in the Texas hill country, is a 411-acre unit consisting of classroom and lodging facilities. Paul Whitfield Horn, the first president of Texas Tech, drew from the broad open plains of West Texas his vision for the institution. "Let us make the work of our college fit into the scope of our country," he said. "Let our thoughts be big thoughts and broad thoughts. Let our thinking be in world-wide-terms." Horn's challenge to Texas Tech, now embarked on its second fifty years, continues as a viable force. His insight is most evident as we-faculty and students, administrators and alumni, supporters and friends- strive to shape the University's programs and activities to meet the highest standards of excellence in teaching, research, and public service.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Law News 0206.Indd
    June 2002 IRS Offers Tax Amnesty Program for 527 Organizations IRS Provides Guidance Until July 15 for 990, 1120-POL The IRS has recently issued Questions and Answers The IRS has created an amnesty program for political regarding annual tax returns required to be fi led by organizations exempt under Section 527 of the Internal Revenue political organizations. These Q&As help answer some Code that have failed to fi le disclosure reports and tax returns questions regarding the reporting of contributions, under the reporting requirements created by Public Law No. the reporting of expenses, and other requirements 106-230. The amnesty program runs until July 15, 2002 and of the Forms. Form 990 is due on August 15 for includes political organizations that have failed to fi le Forms those previously requesting an extension, and Form 8871, 8872, 1120-POL, 990 and 990-EZ. After July 15, the 1120-POL is due on September 15 for those previously IRS will assert all applicable taxes, penalties, and interest against requesting an extension. For those not requesting non-filers and late filers. Note, the amnesty program does extensions and who have yet to fi le either form or NOT apply to political organizations who failed to fi le returns have incorrectly fi led either form, the IRS is offering a required by laws previous to the one enacted in July of 2000 voluntary compliance program until July 15 (see related (e.g., political organizations with more than $100 in taxable article “IRS Offers Tax Amnesty”). income who failed to fi le Form 1120-POL).
    [Show full text]
  • National Security Experts Warn of the Dangers of an Iranian EMP Attack
    National security experts warn of the dangers of an Iranian EMP attack Christopher Collins November 20, 2013 Amidst the Obama administration’s ongoing efforts on Tuesday to negotiate only a partial reduction in Iran’s uranium enrichment in exchange for the easing of sanctions, a panel of noted national security experts is warning of the dangers of an Iranian electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attack. In statements sent to the Paulding County Republican Examiner, the panel gathered on Tuesday and discussed the danger of that country’s escalating nuclear program and the risk that such capabilities could result in an electromagnetic pulse attack on the United States, Israel, or other allied nations. The panel of national security experts was sponsored by EMPACTAmerica and moderated by Frank J. Gaffney, Jr., President and CEO of the Center for Security Policy and former Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy. Gaffney, in his own remarks, discussed the nature of a nuclear-detonated EMP attack, the effect of which would be to take down the electrical grid indefinitely and the potential for an Iranian EMP attack in light of that regime’s determination to develop nuclear weapons and frequently stated intent to bring about “a world without America”. Ambassador John Bolton, former United States Representative to the United Nations, and Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney, USAF (Ret.), former Assistant Vice Chief of Staff, United States Air Force, discussed the dangers, from both a foreign policy and defense perspective of lifting sanctions or of otherwise negotiating with Tehran on its nuclear weapons program. Furthermore, Bolton noted that President Obama’s troubling decision effectively to “chase down” Iranian president Rouhani in order to negotiate a deal would have ramifications for American credibility in the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2009
    ANNUAL REPORT 2009 Our Mission The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History is a nonprofit organization supporting the study and love of American history through a wide range of programs and resources for students, teachers, scholars, and history enthusiasts throughout the nation. The Institute creates and works closely with history-focused schools; organizes summer seminars and development programs for teachers; produces print and digital publications and traveling exhibitions; hosts lectures by eminent historians; administers a History Teacher of the Year Award in every state and US territory; and offers national book prizes and fellowships for scholars to work in the Gilder Lehrman Collection as well as other renowned archives. Gilder Lehrman maintains two websites that serve as gateways to American history online with rich resources for educa - tors: www.gilderlehrman.org and the quarterly online journal www.historynow.org , designed specifically for K-12 teachers and students. The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History Advisory Board Co-Chairmen President Executive Director Richard Gilder James G. Basker Lesley S. Herrmann Lewis E. Lehrman Joyce O. Appleby, Professor of History Emerita, Ellen V. Futter, President, American Museum University of California, Los Angeles of Natural History Edward L. Ayers, President, University of Richmond Henry Louis Gates, Jr., Alphonse Fletcher University William F. Baker, President Emeritus, Educational Professor and Director, W.E.B. Du Bois Institute for Broadcasting Corporation African and African American Research, Thomas H. Bender, University Professor of Harvard University the Humanities, New York University S. Parker Gilbert, Chairman Emeritus, Morgan Stanley Group Carol Berkin, Presidential Professor of History, Allen C. Guelzo, Henry R.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy for Defeating Radical Islam Lt. General Thomas Mcinerney
    Strategy for Defeating Radical Islam Lt. General Thomas McInerney, USAF (Ret.) I would like to thank Professor Dick Thornton and the ISSP for hosting this important symposium and these important subjects that are being discussed today. Now I have challenged myself to lay out a strategy for defeating radical Islam in a very short time frame, but at least it is a start from an administration that has only enabled radical Islam to spread and destabilize the Middle East like no other time in history to include the Crusades. If we look at the Mideast in 2009 when Obama came into office, we had neutralized AQ in Iraq; Syria was quite stable under Bashir Al Assad; Egypt under President Mubarak was a firm ally of 40 years; Libya under Col. Ghadafi had switched to our side and turned in all his nuclear materials, plus he was killing radical Islamists in Benghazi; and Yemen was just festering with AQAP. Our relationship with Saudi and the Gulf States was excellent. Then the Obama Administration came in, and his famous speech in June 2009 at Cairo University that welcomed the Muslim Brotherhood and ignored President Mubarak laid the conditions for the Arab Spring, which has become an Arab Winter. He opened the way for the creation of ISIS when he pulled out U.S. forces in Iraq in December 2011, which made Iraq an Iranian proxy. Not only was Iraq destabilized, but Syria was as well, and Egypt was turned over to the Muslim Brotherhood. In fact, President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton covertly switched sides to radical Islam by supporting Morsi’s election until overthrown by Gen.
    [Show full text]
  • IPC: US Policy Options for Iran
    10 February 2005 U.S. Policy Options for Iran Prepared by: Iran Policy Committee (IPC) Co-Chairs: Ambassador James Akins, (ret.) Lt. Col. Bill Cowan, USMC (ret.), CEO, wvc3, inc. Paul Leventhal, Founder and President Emeritus, Nuclear Control Institute Dr. Neil Livingstone, CEO, Global Options, Inc. Bruce McColm, President, Institute for Democratic Strategies and Former President, International Republican Institute Lt. General (ret.) Thomas McInerney Former Assistant Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force Captain Chuck Nash (ret.) President, Emerging Technologies International Lt. General Edward Rowny (ret.) Former Ambassador Strategic Arms Reduction Talks Professor Raymond Tanter Former Staff Member, National Security Council Major General (ret.) Paul Vallely, Military Committee Chairman, Center for Security Policy Executive Director: Clare Lopez Strategic Policy and Intelligence Analyst Iran Policy Committee 3700 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Suite 507, Washington DC 20016 202-333-7346 (o) 202-333-4126 (fax) Copyright © IPC, All Rights Reserved U.S. Policy Options for Iran: Executive Summary Iran poses six threats to American interests and ideals: • Drive to acquire nuclear weapons • Continuing support for and involvement with terrorist networks • Aid to groups working against the Arab-Israel peace process • Disruptive role in Iraq • Expansionist radical ideology • Denial of basic human rights to its own population With respect to these threats from Iran, Washington circles largely divide between two alternatives—those who favor engagement with and those who support military strikes against the regime. Few favor regime change as an end in itself. While the Bush administration does not yet explicitly call for changing the regime, it advocates working with the Iranian people as opposed to the unelected theocracy in Tehran, which is an implicit policy of regime change.
    [Show full text]
  • Conversation Contents
    Conversation Contents Fwd: Shell Alaska - today NTSB will release its report on Kulluk incident "Colander, Brandi" <[email protected]> From: "Colander, Brandi" <[email protected]> Sent: Wed Aug 19 2015 16:16:49 GMT-0600 (MDT) To: Richard Cardinale <[email protected]> Fwd: Shell Alaska - today NTSB will release its report on Subject: Kulluk incident ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <[email protected]> Date: Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:17 AM Subject: Shell Alaska - today NTSB will release its report on Kulluk incident To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Folks - Perhaps you are aware, but just in case you aren’t. Today the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is expected to release its report on the Kulluk tow incident. Sara Sara Glenn Director, Federal Government Relations & Senior Counsel ∙ Shell Oil Company ∙ 1050 K Street NW Suite 700 ∙ Washington DC 20001-4449 ∙ ph 202 466 1400 ∙ cell 202 299 6472 -- Brandi A. Colander Deputy Assistant Secretary Land & Minerals Management U.S. Department of the Interior Conversation Contents Fwd: Shell Alaska - Seattle /1. Fwd: Shell Alaska - Seattle/1.1 IMG_1958.jpg /1. Fwd: Shell Alaska - Seattle/1.2 image1.jpg "Colander, Brandi" <[email protected]> From: "Colander, Brandi" <[email protected]> Sent: Wed Aug 19 2015 16:17:43 GMT-0600 (MDT) To: Richard Cardinale <[email protected]> Subject: Fwd: Shell Alaska - Seattle Attachments: IMG_1958.jpg image1.jpg ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <[email protected]> Date: Thu, May 14, 2015 at 6:12 PM Subject: Shell Alaska - Seattle To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Brandi, Mike, Celina - Brief update on Seattle.
    [Show full text]
  • So Long… America for an Amount of "Up to and Including Their Life"! TCC See Page 6
    JUNE 2013 Volume 23, Number 06 Member Florida Press Association Sniping Out The Snoops Remember Them All A U.S. Special Forces team member pulls security during a meeting with an Afghan local police checkpoint commander in the Zharay district of Kandahar province, Afghanistan, May 21, 2013. U.S. Army photo by Staff Sgt. Kaily Brown U.S. Marines Plan Ahead A soldier from the 3rd U.S. Infantry Regiment, known as "The Old Guard," leads a riderless horse during the Memorial Day parade in Washington, D.C., May 27, 2013. The riderless horse carries a soldier's boots reversed in the stirrups. U.S. Army photo by Staff Sgt. Teddy Wade Paying Respects U.S. Marines move into position as they conduct a mission rehearsal on Camp Bastion in Helmand province, Afghanistan, May 27, 2013. The Marines and sailors, assigned to Fox Company, 2nd Battalion, 8th Marines, Regimental Combat Team 7, conducted the rehearsal in preparation for a partnered operation with Afghan soldiers. U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Kowshon Ye U.S. Army Keep 5 Meters Apart U.S. Army SSgt Thomas Banner leads his squad on a dismounted presence patrol near Forward Operating Base Spin Boldak in Kandahar province, Afghanistan, June 2, 2013. Banner, a squad leader, is assigned to Company B, 2nd Battalion, 23rd Infantry Regiment. The soldiers were on patrol to meet area farmers and project force posture. U.S. Army photo by Staff Sgt. Shane Hamann Air Force Master Sgt. Robert Lilly pays his respects to a fallen veteran at the Southern Nevada Veterans Memorial Cemetery in Boulder City, Nev., May 25, 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Kemper Inside Front
    AIR WAR COLLEGE AIR UNIVERSITY Aviation Urban Operations Are We Training Like We Fight? TODD G. KEMPER Lieutenant Colonel, USMC Air War College Maxwell Paper No. 33 Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama September 2004 Air University John F. Regni, Lt Gen, Commander Air War College Robert J. Elder Jr., Maj Gen, Commandant Stefan Eisen, Col, Dean Lawrence E. Grinter, PhD, Series Editor Stephen L. Wolborsky, Col, Essay Advisor Air University Press Shirley B. Laseter, DPA, Director Marvin Bassett, PhD, Content Editor Carolyn McCormack, Copy Editor Vivian D. O’Neal, Prepress Production Daniel Armstrong, Cover Design Please send inquiries or comments to Editor The Maxwell Papers Air War College 325 Chennault Circle, Bldg. 1401 Maxwell AFB AL 36112-6427 Tel: (334) 953-7074 Fax: (334) 953-1988 http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/awc-mxwl.htm This Maxwell Paper and others in the series are avail- able electronically at the Air University Research Web site http://research.maxwell.af.mil and the AU Press Web site http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil. Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air Uni- versity, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. ii Foreword Doctrine for joint urban operations, which include aviation urban operations, combined with revised tactics, techniques, and procedures for joint close air support, offers the com- bined/joint force air component commander a set of best practices for conducting counterland operations on urban terrain.
    [Show full text]
  • Customary Justice: Perspectives on Legal Empowerment
    LEGAL AND GOVERNANCE REFORM: LESSONS LEARNED . No. 3 /2011 Customary Justice: Perspectives on Legal Empowerment Janine Ubink, Editor Thomas McInerney, Series Editor Customary Justice: Perspectives on Legal Empowerment Janine Ubink, Editor Thomas McInerney, Series Editor Customary Justice: Perspectives on Legal Empowerment Copyright © International Development Law Organization 2011 International Development Law Organization (IDLO) IDLO is an intergovernmental organization that promotes legal, regulatory and institutional reform to advance economic and social development in transitional and developing countries. Founded in 1983 and one of the leaders in rule of law assistance, IDLO’s comprehensive approach achieves enduring results by mobilizing stakeholders at all levels of society to drive institutional change. Because IDLO wields no political agenda and has deep expertise in different legal systems and emerging global issues, people and interest groups of diverse backgrounds trust IDLO. It has direct access to government leaders, institutions and multilateral organizations in developing countries, including lawyers, jurists, policymakers, advocates, academics and civil society representatives. Among its activities, IDLO conducts timely, focused and comprehensive research in areas related to sustainable development in the legal, regulatory, and justice sectors. Through such research, IDLO seeks to contribute to existing Practice and scholarship on priority legal issues, and to serve as a conduit for the global exchange of ideas, best practices and lessons learned. IDLO produces a variety of professional legal tools covering interdisciplinary thematic and regional issues; these include book series, country studies, research reports, policy papers, training handbooks, glossaries and benchbooks. Research for these publications is conducted independently with the support of its country offices and in cooperation with international and national partner organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • SENATOR MITCH Mcconnell, Et Al., Plaintiffs, V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, Et Al., Defendants. NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION, Et
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SENATOR MITCH McCONNELL, et al., Plaintiffs, Civ. No. 02-582 v. (CKK, KLH, RJL) FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION, et al., Plaintiffs, Civ. No. 02-581 v. (CKK, KLH, RJL) FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. EMILY ECHOLS, et al., Plaintiffs, Civ. No. 02-633 v. (CKK, KLH, RJL) FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES, et al., Plaintiffs, Civ. No. 02-751 v. (CKK, KLH, RJL) FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS, Plaintiff, Civ. No. 02-753 v. (CKK, KLH, RJL) FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. AFL-CIO, et al., Plaintiffs, Civ. No. 02-754 (CKK, KLH, RJL) v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. 2 CONGRESSMAN RON PAUL, et al., Plaintiffs, Civ. No. 02-781 v. (CKK, KLH, RJL) FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, et al., Plaintiffs, Civ. No. 02-874 (CKK, KLH, RJL) v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, Defendant. CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, et al., Plaintiffs, Civ. No. 02-875 (CKK, KLH, RJL) v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. 3 VICTORIA JACKSON GRAY ADAMS, et al., Plaintiffs, Civ. No. 02-877 (CKK, KLH, RJL) v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, Defendant. BENNIE G. THOMPSON, et al., Plaintiffs, Civ. No. 02-881 v. (CKK, KLH, RJL) FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. 4 “To an imagination of any scope the most far-reaching form of power is not money, it is the command of ideas.” —Oliver Wendell Holmes, The Path of the Law, 10 HARV.
    [Show full text]
  • Filer Code List Sorted by Filer Name
    Entry Filer Code List by Filer Name 19 CFR 142.3a(c) U.S. Customs and Border Protection FILER-CODE FILER-NAME 8NJ 1 CLICK CUSTOMS INCORPORATED QE6 123 DISTRIBUTORS TZ1 138 INTERNATIONAL, INC. 92K 24/7 CUSTOMS INC. BGM 2ND EDISON INC. 8GV 361 USA INC BT1 3D INDUSTRIES INC. MMM 3M COMPANY 83Q 3P CUSTOMS CONSULTANTS, L.L.C. EFM 3V INC. KQ3 3V, INC. 8HY 4M WORLD BROKERS, INC. EUB 5.11, INC. EVM 5K LOGISTICS, INC. 97E 721 LOGISTICS LLC 8E6 88 SPIRITS CORPORATION 8FM A & A CUSTOMS BROKERAGE INC WFE A & A INTERNATIONAL SERVICES, INC. 038 A & A, LTD. MD1 A & B IMPORT EXPORT INC EFD A & B WIPER SUPPLY, INC. EH2 A & C IMPORT EXPORT SERVICES, INC. STS A & C INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS, LLC MW6 A & D BROKERAGE INC. F31 A & F INTL 8YW A & L CUSTOMS BROKERAGE LLC 722 A & M CUSTOMS BROKERS CO ADJ A & S ENTERPRISES LLC 498 A ALEXANDER LUCIOS 9HT A AUDIO 9X6 A BROKERAGE FIRM MH9 A CUSTOMS BROKERAGE, INC. 844 A J ELLIOT CO 504 A J MURRAY & CO INC J02 A K MEADOWS 416 A L FASE & CO BW0 A MICHAEL GRAY 551 A N DERINGER, INC. R52 A O SMITH CORP T37 A SCOTT BROADHURST PA7 A T & T INC B9T A&A ACTION CUSTOMS BROKERAGE, LLC SQ4 A&A CONTRACT CUSTOMS BROKERS USA 146 A&J CUSTOMS BROKERS, INC. 817 A. VILLARREAL M32 A. ZERTUCHE, JR., CHB 993 A.A. CUSTOMS BROKER INC WHA A.B.I. FILER-CODE FILER-NAME AXB A.B.S.
    [Show full text]