DOCSLIB.ORG

An Updated Review of the Pythons Including Resolution of Issues of Taxonomy and Nomenclature

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Updated Review of the Pythons Including Resolution of Issues of Taxonomy and Nomenclature 2 Australasian Journal of Herpetology Australasian Journal of herpetology 10: 2-32. ISSN 1836-5698 (Print) Published 8 April 2012. ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) AN UPDATED REVIEW OF THE PYTHONS INCLUDING RESOLUTION OF ISSUES OF TAXONOMY AND NOMENCLATURE. RAYMOND T. HOSER 488 Park Road, Park Orchards, Victoria, 3134, Australia. Phone: +61 3 9812 3322 Fax: 9812 3355 E-mail: [email protected] Received 27 March 2012, Accepted 5 April 2012, Published 8 April 2012. ABSTRACT This paper reviews the python group of snakes. It resolves issues of taxonomy and nomenclature, including by means of publication (this paper), effectively settling any disputes about potential validity of names for use according to the ICZN rules for various well-defined taxa. In accordance with the ICZN code, this paper formally names one new genus (Jackypython gen. nov.), one new subgenus (Rawlingspython subgen. nov), two new species, (Morelia wellsi sp. nov. and Australiasis funki sp. nov.) and one new subspecies, (Chondropython viridis adelynhoserae subsp. nov.). A neotype is desig- nated for A. amethistina. Furthermore, four subspecies within the genus Aspidites and one subspecies within Leiopython are formally named. Assessed are matters relating to the genus Leiopython and a 2008 paper by Wulf Schleip. This paper redefines the family composition at tribe level. As a result, one new tribe is erected, namely Broghammerini tribe nov.. For the pre-existing tribe Moreliini there are four newly identified subtribes, namely Moreliina subtribe nov., Aspiditesina subtribe nov., Katrinina subtribe nov. and Antaresiina subtribe nov.. Refer also to relevant notes within this paper. Keywords: snake; reptile; Jackypython; Rawlingspython; adelynhoserae; Leiopython; hoserae; Schleip; Wüster; Williams; smuggling, animal cruelty; albertisi; taxonomy; fraud; wikipedia; biakensis; barkerorum; bennettorum; huonensis; fredparkeri; wellsi; antaresia; Morelia; funki; Chondropython; Australiasis; Katrinus; Shireenhoserus; Lenhoserus; Aspidites; neildavieii; rickjonesi; adelynensis; panoptes; python; Broghammerini; Aspiditesina; Katrinina; Antaresiina; Moreliina; Moreliini; Pythonini. INTRODUCTION Due to a number of factors including the commercial significance The “true” pythons of Africa, Asia and Australasia had for most of of these snakes, their generally large size and popularity among the last century been placed in the sub-family Pythoninae, although hobbyist keepers and more recently government-backed attempts in recent years, there has been a move by taxonomists to elevate to remove these snakes from private keepers in several countries, this status to full family (as in Pythonidae), which is agreed by this there have been numerous studies into the taxonomy of these author. snakes. The classification of the pythonidae as defined by Romer (1956) p. Furthermore, there has also been a vast amount of previously 572, (he referred to them as pythoninae) has been the subject of unreported or relatively little-known information about the intense debate. pythonidae published in other scientific and popular literature, The pythonidae are separated from the boidae by the presence of including in such publications as: Banks (1974, 1980), Barker and a supraorbital bone, egg-laying versus live bearing, scalation Barker (1994a, 1994b, 1995, 1999), Barnett (1979, 1987, 1993, differences and other characters (McDowall 1975). 1999), Broghammer (2001), Bullian (1994), Chiras (1982), Comber (1999), Covacevich and Limpus (1973), Cox (1991), David and There have also been numerous published studies detailing the Vogel (1996), Dunn (1979), Ehmann (1992), Fearn (1996), morphology and biochemistry of the pythonidae and related FitzSimmons (1970), Gharpurey (1962), Gow (1977, 1981, 1989), snakes. Greer (1997), Heijden (1988), Hoser (1981a, 1981b, 1981c, 1982, Hoser Australasian 2012 Journal - of Herpetology 10:1-52. Available online at www.herp.net Copyright- Kotabi Publishing - All rights reserved Australasian Journal of Herpetology 3 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991a, 1991b, 1992, 1993a, 1993b, 1995, 1996, adequately separates the best known component species as cited 1999a, 1999b, 1999c, 1999d), Kend (1992, 1997), Kend and Kend at the rear of this paper. This paper does not significantly amend (1992), Kortlang (1989), Krauss (1995), Maguire (1995), Martin the taxonomy used in the paper Hoser (2000b), save for the (1973), Maryan (1984), Maryan and George (1998), Mattison addition of more recently described species and/or subspecies. (1980), Mavromichalis and Bloem (1994), McDowell (1984), The taxonomy used in Hoser (2000b) has been widely adopted in McLain (1980), Mirtschin and Davis (1992), Murdoch (1999), the twelve years since publication. Examples include: Clark 2002, O’Shea (1996), Reitinger (1978), Romer (1956), Rooyendijk Kuroski 2001 and 2002 (all for Morelia harrisoni), and Schleip 2001 (1999), Ross (1973, 1978), Ross and Marzec (1990), Schwaner (for the various subspecies of L. albertisi) as named formally by and Dessauer (1981), Sheargold (1979), Shine (1991), Shine, Hoser (2000b). Ambariyanto, Harlow, Mumpuni, (1998), Smith (1981a, 1981b, In this paper is a list of all currently (as of this paper) recognised 1985), Sonneman (1999), Storr, Smith and Johnstone (1986), Stull tribes, genera, subgenera, species and subspecies of python, (1932, 1935), Thomson (1935), Webber (1978), Weigel (1988), including those formally named for the first time herein. It should Wells and Wellington (1983, 1985), Williams (1992), Wilson and be noted that in the period 2000 to present (March 2012) claims Knowles (1988), Worrell (1951, 1970) and the many further have been made that certain taxa named by this author in sources of information referred to directly in these publications. publications prior to this date (2012) were not validly published Even this list of publications is far from the complete available according to the ICZN’s code (in force from 2000)(cited herein record about pythons. twice, as “Ride et. al. 1999” and also “ICZN 1999”). While I would Among the better known taxonomic studies in recent times dealing dispute these claims, the problem is more easily dealt with by way specifically with the Pythonidae are Harvey, Barker, Ammerman of description herein “as new” to settle the nomenclature and give and Chippendale. (2000), Keogh, Barker and Shine (2001), Kluge stability of names for other workers. (1993), McDowall (1975) and Rawlings et. al. (2008), Underwood These formal descriptions are incorporated within the text of this and Stimson (1990) and others. paper. This forms an enormous database of information on these snakes. RELEVANT KEY FACTS AND COMMENTS Notwithstanding this vast body of available evidence, the taxo- The following is directly relevant to the formal descriptions that nomic arrangements used in the past by most authors have been follow, the general taxonomy used and forms a part of the generally inconsistent across the group. However Hoser 2004a, descriptions and this paper. presented a classification that made sense of the data and was The list published with this paper of all python taxa, arranged via later corroborated in full by the data presented by Rawlings et. al. their tribe arrangements in itself shows the taxonomic conclusions 2008, (see in particular Fig A at top of page 614), although the made by this author. authors stopped short of going the logical next step and adopting in However a few other comments in this regard are warranted. full the nomenclature of Hoser 2004a. Two genera of snakes, namely Loxocemus and Calabaria are not They did however adopt usage of the genus name Broghammerus closely related to other python genera and were removed from the Hoser 2004 for the species reticulatus, adding to the genus, the “Pythoninae” in 1976 by Underwood. They are now placed in species timoriensis, transferring it from the Hoser 2004 position of different subfamilies or in a different family altogether. Australiasis. That move is currently supported herein, but solely on the basis of acceptance of the data of rawlings, et. al. 2008. More recent evidence (including Heise, et. al. (1995) p. 261, Fig. 1.) confirms this move by Underwood and those two genera have As the rest of the data of Rawlings et. al. 2008 and later authors been effectively ignored for the purposes of this paper. (e.g. Schleip 2008), supports the Hoser 2004a taxonomy, it stands to reason that over time, the nomenclature of Hoser 2004a, will Calabaria are readily separated from all true pythons (excluding move into general usage, unless earlier overlooked synonyms for Aspidites from Australia) by their more-or-less cylindrical body names used emerges. shape and the fact that their head is not distinct from the neck as in true pythons (again excluding Aspidites). This paper does not seek to rehash the detail of Hoser 2004a, which in effect is adopted herein in toto, save for additions or Aspidites can be readily separated by their yellowish brown body changes indicated here. However it does seek to revist the colour and dorsal pattern with a tendency towards distinct or taxonomy and nomenclature with a view to filling gaps, in particular indistinct transverse banding. By contrast for Calabaria the dorsal the division of the Pythonidae at the level between family and colour in Calabaria is a more dark and reddish brown and the genus. To do this, all genera are assigned to appropriate tribes pattern is not tending towards transverse banding in any way. which are formally described according to the ICZN
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Level 1 Fauna Survey of the Gruyere Gold Project Borefields (Harewood 2016)
    GOLD ROAD RESOURCES LIMITED GRUYERE PROJECT EPA REFERRAL SUPPORTING DOCUMENT APPENDIX 5: LEVEL 1 FAUNA SURVEY OF THE GRUYERE GOLD PROJECT BOREFIELDS (HAREWOOD 2016) Gruyere EPA Ref Support Doc Final Rev 1.docx Fauna Assessment (Level 1) Gruyere Borefield Project Gold Road Resources Limited January 2016 Version 3 On behalf of: Gold Road Resources Limited C/- Botanica Consulting PO Box 2027 BOULDER WA 6432 T: 08 9093 0024 F: 08 9093 1381 Prepared by: Greg Harewood Zoologist PO Box 755 BUNBURY WA 6231 M: 0402 141 197 T/F: (08) 9725 0982 E: [email protected] GRUYERE BOREFIELD PROJECT –– GOLD ROAD RESOURCES LTD – FAUNA ASSESSMENT (L1) – JAN 2016 – V3 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................1 2. SCOPE OF WORKS ...............................................................................................1 3. RELEVANT LEGISTALATION ................................................................................2 4. METHODS...............................................................................................................3 4.1 POTENTIAL VETEBRATE FAUNA INVENTORY - DESKTOP SURVEY ............. 3 4.1.1 Database Searches.......................................................................................3 4.1.2 Previous Fauna Surveys in the Area ............................................................3 4.1.3 Existing Publications .....................................................................................5 4.1.4 Fauna
    [Show full text]
  • Husbandry Manual for the Shingleback Lizard Tiliqua Rugosa
    Husbandry Manual for The Shingleback Lizard Tiliqua rugosa GRAY, 1825 Reptilia:Scincidae Compiler: Andrew Titmuss Date of Preparation: 2007 University of Western Sydney, Hawkesbury © Andrew Titmuss 2007 1 A Husbandry Manual template has been developed to standardise information on captive management needs in a concise, accessible and usable form. Currently there is no Husbandry Manual for the Shingleback Lizard. As these lizards are commonly kept in zoological and private collections in Australia and internationally, a Husbandry Manual could be widely used. This Husbandry Manual is set out as per the husbandry manual template designed by Stephen Jackson and Graeme Phipps. The template is a document that was created to maintain husbandry manual uniformity and thus its effectiveness and ease of use. It is intended as a working document. It is designed to be used by any institution, as well as private collections, holding this species. Although these lizards are easy to keep in captivity they do have some special requirements. The aim of the Husbandry Manual is to summarise and consolidate information regarding OHS, natural history, captive management and ethical husbandry techniques and conservation from a variety of sources. It should provide information on appropriate husbandry with scope for improved health and welfare and captive breeding if required. The University of Western Sydney, Hawkesbury Campus, is planning on keeping Shingleback Lizards amongst other species in their reptile unit. This manual can be used by the University of
    [Show full text]
  • Prevent Problems with Large Boas & Pythons
    Client Education—Snake Safety Tips Prevent Problems with Large Boas & Pythons ! According to the Humane Society of the United States,17 deaths and many more injuries have been related to large constrictors since 1978. Given the tens of thousands of large constrictors sold, the incidence of fatalities and injuries is relatively low, however every incident—including the death of four babies in their cribs and three additional children— is particularly tragic since such cases are completely preventable. So called “giant snakes” regularly exceed 8 feet (2.4 m) in length, potentially making them difficult or even unsafe to handle. Large constrictor species include the green anaconda (Eunectes murinus), Indian python (Python molurus), African rock python (Python sebae), amethystine python (Morelia amethistina), reticulated python (Python reticulatus), and Burmese python (Python molurus bivittatus). Only the latter two species, reticulated and Burmese pythons, are regularly found in the pet trade, however these species can exceed 20 feet (6.1 m) and are not recommended for casual hobbyists. One real life tragedy: In 2011, a Florida mother and her boyfriend were found guilty of the murder of her 2-year old daughter, strangled by her 8-foot 6- “The baby’s dead. inch pet Burmese python. The child was found in her crib, with the Our stupid snake snake coiled tightly around her neck and numerous bite marks on got out in the middle her face. of the night and strangled the Evaluation of the albino python named “Gypsy” found her to be baby”.—Florida man underweight, and the snake's enclosure had only a quilt for a lid.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Rule to List Reticulated Python And
    Vol. 80 Tuesday, No. 46 March 10, 2015 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife 50 CFR Part 16 Injurious Wildlife Species; Listing Three Anaconda Species and One Python Species as Injurious Reptiles; Final Rule VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:14 Mar 09, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\10MRR2.SGM 10MRR2 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2 12702 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 46 / Tuesday, March 10, 2015 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Services Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 3330) to list Burmese (and Indian) Service, 1339 20th Street, Vero Beach, pythons, Northern African pythons, Fish and Wildlife Service FL 32960–3559; telephone 772–562– Southern African pythons, and yellow 3909 ext. 256; facsimile 772–562–4288. anacondas as injurious wildlife under 50 CFR Part 16 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob the Lacey Act. The remaining five RIN 1018–AV68 Progulske, Everglades Program species (reticulated python, boa Supervisor, South Florida Ecological constrictor, green anaconda, [Docket No. FWS–R9–FHC–2008–0015; Services Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife DeSchauensee’s anaconda, and Beni FXFR13360900000–145–FF09F14000] Service, 1339 20th Street, Vero Beach, anaconda) were not listed at that time and remained under consideration for Injurious Wildlife Species; Listing FL 32960–3559; telephone 772–469– 4299. If you use a telecommunications listing. With this final rule, we are Three Anaconda Species and One listing four of those species (reticulated Python Species as Injurious Reptiles device for the deaf (TDD), please call the Federal Information Relay Service python, green anaconda, AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, (FIRS) at 800–877–8339.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigations Into the Presence of Nidoviruses in Pythons Silvia Blahak1, Maria Jenckel2,3, Dirk Höper2, Martin Beer2, Bernd Hoffmann2 and Kore Schlottau2*
    Blahak et al. Virology Journal (2020) 17:6 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-020-1279-5 RESEARCH Open Access Investigations into the presence of nidoviruses in pythons Silvia Blahak1, Maria Jenckel2,3, Dirk Höper2, Martin Beer2, Bernd Hoffmann2 and Kore Schlottau2* Abstract Background: Pneumonia and stomatitis represent severe and often fatal diseases in different captive snakes. Apart from bacterial infections, paramyxo-, adeno-, reo- and arenaviruses cause these diseases. In 2014, new viruses emerged as the cause of pneumonia in pythons. In a few publications, nidoviruses have been reported in association with pneumonia in ball pythons and a tiger python. The viruses were found using new sequencing methods from the organ tissue of dead animals. Methods: Severe pneumonia and stomatitis resulted in a high mortality rate in a captive breeding collection of green tree pythons. Unbiased deep sequencing lead to the detection of nidoviral sequences. A developed RT-qPCR was used to confirm the metagenome results and to determine the importance of this virus. A total of 1554 different boid snakes, including animals suffering from respiratory diseases as well as healthy controls, were screened for nidoviruses. Furthermore, in addition to two full-length sequences, partial sequences were generated from different snake species. Results: The assembled full-length snake nidovirus genomes share only an overall genome sequence identity of less than 66.9% to other published snake nidoviruses and new partial sequences vary between 99.89 and 79.4%. Highest viral loads were detected in lung samples. The snake nidovirus was not only present in diseased animals, but also in snakes showing no typical clinical signs.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Reptiles You Don™T Have Yet Pets of Th
    The North American Veterinary Conference — 2006 ______________________________________________________________________________________________ AUSTRALIAN REPTILES YOU DON’T HAVE Pythons, Amethystine Python, and Diamond YET: PETS OF THE FUTURE? Pythons), Liasis (Children’s, Spotted, Water, Olive, and Stimson’s Pythons), and Chondropython (Green Python). All are kept in captivity in Australia, Bob Doneley, BVSc, FACVSc (Avian Health) and their popularity as pets is rising. All are West Toowoomba Vet Surgery carnivorous; some are terrestrial and others are Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia semi-arboreal. Although Dutch explorers had visited the Australian • Colubridae (Colubrid Snakes). These are the continent in the1600 and 1700s, it was not until Joseph solid-toothed and rear-fanged snakes. Other than Banks, the noted British botanist, accompanied Captain Australia, they are the dominant snakes throughout James Cook RN on his voyage of discovery along the the world. They include the Tree Snakes, east coast of Australia in 1770 that Australia’s unique Freshwater Snake, Mangrove Snakes, and Water flora and fauna was revealed to the outside world. Snakes. Although the Brown Tree Snake is An insatiable demand for the unusual saw the shooting, aggressive and venomous, it is not regarded as collection, trapping, and exportation of Australian wildlife dangerous to humans. These snakes are oviparous. to collectors in Europe and America. It was not until 1960 that the Australian Government finally realized the • Elapidae (Elapid Snakes). These front-fanged necessity of banning this trade. Since then, despite venomous snakes include some of the deadliest pressure from both home and abroad, Australia has snakes in the world— of the eleven most dangerous steadfastly refused to allow the exportation of its wildlife; snakes in the world, eight are Australian elapids.
    [Show full text]
  • MAHS Care Sheet Master List *By Eric Roscoe Care Sheets Are Often An
    MAHS Care Sheet Master List *By Eric Roscoe Care sheets are often an excellent starting point for learning more about the biology and husbandry of a given species, including their housing/enclosure requirements, temperament and handling, diet , and other aspects of care. MAHS itself has created many such care sheets for a wide range of reptiles, amphibians, and invertebrates we believe to have straightforward care requirements, and thus make suitable family and beginner’s to intermediate level pets. Some species with much more complex, difficult to meet, or impracticable care requirements than what can be adequately explained in a one page care sheet may be multiple pages. We can also provide additional links, resources, and information on these species we feel are reliable and trustworthy if requested. If you would like to request a copy of a care sheet for any of the species listed below, or have a suggestion for an animal you don’t see on our list, contact us to let us know! Unfortunately, for liability reasons, MAHS is unable to create or publish care sheets for medically significant venomous species. This includes species in the families Crotilidae, Viperidae, and Elapidae, as well as the Helodermatidae (the Gila Monsters and Mexican Beaded Lizards) and some medically significant rear fanged Colubridae. Those that are serious about wishing to learn more about venomous reptile husbandry that cannot be adequately covered in one to three page care sheets should take the time to utilize all available resources by reading books and literature, consulting with, and working with an experienced and knowledgeable mentor in order to learn the ropes hands on.
    [Show full text]
  • Very Venomous, But...- Snakes of the Wet Tropics
    No.80 January 2004 Notes from Very venomous but ... the Australia is home to some of the most venomous snakes in the world. Why? Editor It is possible that strong venom may little chance to fight back. There are six main snake families have evolved chiefly as a self-defence in Australia – elapids (venomous strategy. It is interesting to look at the While coastal and inland taipans eat snakes, the largest group), habits of different venomous snakes. only mammals, other venomous colubrids (‘harmless’ snakes) Some, such as the coastal taipan snakes feed largely on reptiles and pythons, blindsnakes, filesnakes (Oxyuranus scutellatus), bite their frogs. Venom acts slowly on these and seasnakes. prey quickly, delivering a large amount ‘cold-blooded’ creatures with slow of venom, and then let go. The strong metabolic rates, so perhaps it needs to Australia is the only continent venom means that the prey doesn’t be especially strong. In addition, as where venomous snakes (70 get far before succumbing so the many prey species develop a degree of percent) outnumber non- snake is able to follow at a safe immunity to snake venom, a form of venomous ones. Despite this, as distance. Taipans eat only mammals – evolutionary arms race may have been the graph on page one illustrates, which are able to bite back, viciously. taking place. very few deaths result from snake This strategy therefore allows the bites. It is estimated that between snake to avoid injury. … not necessarily deadly 50 000 and 60 000 people die of On the other hand, the most Some Australian snakes may be snake bite each year around the particularly venomous, but they are world.
    [Show full text]
  • AC27 Inf. 17 (Rev.1) (English Only / Únicamente En Inglés / Seulement En Anglais)
    AC27 Inf. 17 (Rev.1) (English only / únicamente en inglés / seulement en anglais) CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________ Twenty-seventh meeting of the Animals Committee Veracruz (Mexico), 28 April – 3 May 2014 INSPECTION MANUAL FOR USE IN COMMERCIAL REPTILE BREEDING FACILITIES IN SOUTHEAST ASIA 1. The attached information document has been submitted by the Secretariat and has been prepared by TRAFFIC* in relation to agenda item 9. * The geographical designations employed in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the CITES Secretariat or the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for the contents of the document rests exclusively with its author. AC27 Doc. 17 (Rev.1) – p. 1 Inspection Manual for use in Commercial Reptile Breeding Facilities in Southeast Asia EU- CITES Capacity - building project N o . S - 408 2013 CITES Secretariat About the EU-CITES Capacity-building project The project Strengthening CITES implementation capacity of developing countries to ensure sustainable wildlife management and non-detrimental trade was approved for funding by the European Union in 2009. A major challenge for many countries is the difficulty in meeting the requirements for trade in CITES-listed species, ranging from legal sourcing and sustainability requirements, to the effective control of legal trade and deterrence of illegal trade. Mechanisms exist in CITES and in both exporting and importing countries that promote and facilitate compliance – although Parties are often hampered by a lack of capacity or a lack of current biological or trade information with respect to certain species.
    [Show full text]
  • Snakes of the Wet Tropics
    Snakes of the Wet Tropics Snakes are protected by law Snakes are shy creatures. When confronted by humans, they will usually retreat if given the opportunity to do so. As most bites occur when people try to catch and kill snakes, they should always be left well alone. Snakes in the Wet Tropics The Wet Tropics region is home to 43 species of snakes, representing an impressive 30% of Australia’s snake fauna. These images represent a selection of the more common species, most of which have ranges extending beyond the Wet Tropics. Of the species pictured, only the northern crowned snake is unique to this region. The snakes of the region range from small, worm-like blind snakes to six metre pythons. Only a handful fall into the dangerously venomous category, but these few play an important role in balancing the natural environment, as they are significant predators of rats and mice. Snakes in the backyard If you live near bushland or creeks you are more likely to encounter snakes in your garden, especially if there is habitat disturbance such as burning or clearing of vegetation in the local area. To discourage snakes from taking up residence around your home remove likely hiding places such as logs, building materials, long grass, loose rocks, discarded flower pots and corrugated iron. Snakes in the house Snakes will sometimes enter a house in search of food and shelter - particularly during periods of extended rain. The risk of this happening can be reduced by having well-sealed doors and screens over external windows.
    [Show full text]
  • G Iant Snakes
    Copyrighted Material Some pages are omitted from this book preview. Giant Snakes Giant Giant Snakes A Natural History John C. Murphy & Tom Crutchfield Snakes, particularly venomous snakes and exceptionally large constricting snakes, have haunted the human brain for a millennium. They appear to be responsible for our excellent vision, as well as the John C. Murphy & Tom Crutchfield & Tom C. Murphy John anxiety we feel. Despite the dangers we faced in prehistory, snakes now hold clues to solving some of humankind’s most debilitating diseases. Pythons and boas are capable of eating prey that is equal to more than their body weight, and their adaptations for this are providing insight into diabetes. Fascination with snakes has also drawn many to keep them as pets, including the largest species. Their popularity in the pet trade has led to these large constrictors inhabiting southern Florida. This book explores what we know about the largest snakes, how they are kept in captivity, and how they have managed to traverse ocean barriers with our help. Copyrighted Material Some pages are omitted from this book preview. Copyrighted Material Some pages are omitted from this book preview. Giant Snakes A Natural History John C. Murphy & Tom Crutchfield Copyrighted Material Some pages are omitted from this book preview. Giant Snakes Copyright © 2019 by John C. Murphy & Tom Cructhfield All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means including information storage and retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in the United States of America First Printing March 2019 ISBN 978-1-64516-232-2 Paperback ISBN 978-1-64516-233-9 Hardcover Published by: Book Services www.BookServices.us ii Copyrighted Material Some pages are omitted from this book preview.
    [Show full text]
  • A LIST of the VERTEBRATES of SOUTH AUSTRALIA
    A LIST of the VERTEBRATES of SOUTH AUSTRALIA updates. for Edition 4th Editors See A.C. Robinson K.D. Casperson Biological Survey and Research Heritage and Biodiversity Division Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia M.N. Hutchinson South Australian Museum Department of Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts, South Australia 2000 i EDITORS A.C. Robinson & K.D. Casperson, Biological Survey and Research, Biological Survey and Research, Heritage and Biodiversity Division, Department for Environment and Heritage. G.P.O. Box 1047, Adelaide, SA, 5001 M.N. Hutchinson, Curator of Reptiles and Amphibians South Australian Museum, Department of Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts. GPO Box 234, Adelaide, SA 5001updates. for CARTOGRAPHY AND DESIGN Biological Survey & Research, Heritage and Biodiversity Division, Department for Environment and Heritage Edition Department for Environment and Heritage 2000 4thISBN 0 7308 5890 1 First Edition (edited by H.J. Aslin) published 1985 Second Edition (edited by C.H.S. Watts) published 1990 Third Edition (edited bySee A.C. Robinson, M.N. Hutchinson, and K.D. Casperson) published 2000 Cover Photograph: Clockwise:- Western Pygmy Possum, Cercartetus concinnus (Photo A. Robinson), Smooth Knob-tailed Gecko, Nephrurus levis (Photo A. Robinson), Painted Frog, Neobatrachus pictus (Photo A. Robinson), Desert Goby, Chlamydogobius eremius (Photo N. Armstrong),Osprey, Pandion haliaetus (Photo A. Robinson) ii _______________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS
    [Show full text]