DOCSLIB.ORG

Lepidoptera: Microlepidoptera)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Folia faunistica Slovaca, 2010, 15 (9): 61–93 ISSN 1335-7522 A checklist of MicrolepidopterA occured in slovAkiA (lepidopterA: MicrolepidopterA) Gabriel Pastorális Košická 22/39, 945 01 Komárno, Slovakia [[email protected]] pastorális G, 2010: A checklist of Microlepidoptera occured in slovakia (lepidoptera: Microlepidoptera). Folia faunistica Slovaca, 15 (9): 61–93. Abstract: The latest checklist of Microlepidoptera of Slovakia (Pastorális & Reiprich 1995) is revised and supplemened with new records and updated in- formation. Numerous new distributional data are provided and taxonomical changes based on literary sources of the years past are taken into account. All newkey words:references regarding to changes of the Slovak fauna are added. checklist, Microlepidoptera, Slovakia. introduction table 1. family List of familiesspp. and numberf ofamily species. spp. This checklist is an updated and revised version of Acrolepiidae 8 Incurvariidae 8 the latest checklist of Microlepidoptera of Slova- Adelidae 30 Lecithoceridae 3 kia (Pastorális & Reiprich 1995). It was publis- Agonoxenidae 12 Limacodidae 2 hed only in a modest printing and thus was little Alucitidae 5 Lyonetiidae 15 available. Necessity of the new uptaded and more Amphisbatidae 14 Micropterigidae 9 accessible checklist arised during the past years. The presented checklist is supplemented with spe- Autostichidae 10 Momphidae 16 cies of Microlepidoptera new to the Slovak fauna. Batrachedridae 2 Nepticulidae 134 The classification and nomenclature follow mainly Bedelliidae 1 Oecophoridae 44 The Lepidoptera of Europe, the 2nd version of the Blastobasidae 6 Opostegidae 4 distributional checklist (Karsholt & Nieukerken Brachodidae 2 Plutellidae 6 2009). Bucculatricidae 20 Prodoxidae 13 Carposinidae 2 Psychidae 41 Numbers of first references from Slovakia are gi- Chimabachidae 3 Pterolonchidae 1 ven after each species names beginning with the Choreutidae 9 Pterophoridae 60 basic faunistic work, Prodromus Lepidopterorum Coleophoridae 200 Pyralidae 115 Slovaciae (Hrubý 1964). Hrubý’s reference compri- Cosmopterigidae 22 Roesslerstammii- ses all older literary sources concerning the fauna 2 Cossidae 6 dae up to 1960. If some of records from Slovakia was Crambidae 164 Schreckensteini- published firstly abroad a reference regarding to it 1 Depressariidae 70 idae is numbered, too. In a separate section several se- Douglasiidae 5 Scythrididae 29 lected genus and species are annotated. In particu- Elachistidae 80 Sesiidae 47 lar, list of species yet published from the territory Thyrididae 1 of Slovakia but now excluded from various reasons Epermeniidae 15 is also done. Eriocraniidae 6 Tineidae 63 Ethmiidae 8 Tischeriidae 8 In the near future the checklist shall appear in e- Gelechiidae 247 Tortricidae 509 formA CHECKLIST with regular OF f supplementations.AMILIES, GENERA AND SPECIES Glyphipterigidae 8 Urodidae 1 Gracillariidae 121 Yponomeutidae 59 Heliodinidae 1 Ypsolophidae 21 species total 2324 Heliozelidae 4 Zygaenidae 25 Comments: Numbers of first references from Slo- Hepialidae 6 vakia© Faunima, are Bratislava, after the 2010 names of species; references in http://zoology.fns.uniba.sk/ffs 61 [no] luteella * glutinosae square brackets are misidentifications;n spe- alnetella (Stainton, 1857) – 3 cies marked with ( ) are commented in notes; yet microtheriella (Stainton, 1858) – 1 MunpublishedICROPTERI recordsGoideA or data are marked ( ). prunetorum (Stainton, 1856) – 1 aceris (Stainton, 1854) – 1 Micropterix hübner, 1825 malella (Stainton, 1855) – 1 MICROPTERIGIDAEallionella nigrobrunella (Frey, 1857) – 1 aruncella rhamnella (Stainton, 1854) – 1 Groschke, 1939 aureatella (Fabricius, 1794) – 3 catharticella – 3 ammanella (Scopoli, 1763) – 1 anomalella (Herrich-Schäffer, 1860) – 3 aureoviridella (Scopoli, 1763) – 1 aeneella (Stainton, 1853) – 3 Hübner, 1810 – 1 centifoliella (Goeze, 1783) – 1 calthella Heinemann, 1862 mansuetella Höfner, 1898 – 1 ulmivora – 1 myrtetella (Linnaeus, 1761) – 1 ulmifoliae (Zeller, 1848) – 1 Zeller, 1844 – 14 ulmicola (Fologne, 1860) – 1 osthelderi Hering, 1931 tunbergella Zeller, 1850 – 1 ulmiphaga – 1 Hering, 1932 – 1 thunbergella Heath, 1975 – 10 viscerella (Fabricius, 1787) sanguisorbae (Preissecker, 1942) – 3 eriocrAnioideA auct. – 1 thuringiaca (Stainton, 1853) – 1 rolandi (Wocke, 1865) – 6, 37 Dyseriocrania spuler, 1910 spinosissimae (Petry, 1904) – 3 ERIOCRANIIDAEsubpurpurella paradoxa van Nieukerken, 1990 – 65 sensu Klimesch, 1951 fastuosella nitidella – 3 Heringocrania k uznetzov,(Haworth, 19411828) – 1 inopinata (Frey, 1858) – 1 Zeller, 1839 Heinemann, 1862 unimaculella – 3 regiella – 1 Eriocrania Zeller, 1851 corvimontana A. & Z. Laštůvka, 1991 – 8 sparrmannella (Zetterstedt, 1839) – 1 crataegella (Herrich-Schäffer, 1855) – 1 E.Hering, 1935 sangii hahniella – 1 cicatricella (Bosc, 1791) – 1 magdalenae (Klimesch, 1936) – 3 purpurella (Wood, 1891) – 14 nylandriella (Wörtz, 1890) – 1 semipurpurella (Zetterstedt,1839) aucupariae (Klimesch, 1950) – 3 Haworth, 1828 nec Thunberg, 1788 – 1 oxyacanthella (Tengström, 1848) – 1 Frey, 1957 hepiALOIDEA (Stephens, 1835) – 1 pyri – 1 minusculella (Stainton, 1854) – 1 Triodia hübner, 1820 stettinensis (Glitz, 1865) – 1 HEPIALIDAEsylvina desperatella (Herrich-Schäffer, 1856) – 1 Pharmacis hübner, 1820 pyricola (Heinemann, 1871) – 40 lupulina (Linnaeus, 1761) – 1 hybnerella (Frey, 1856) – 1 Wocke, 1877 fusconebulosa gratiosella – 1 carna (Linnaeus, 1758) – 1 ignobilella (Hübner, 1796) – 1 Duponchel, 1843 Phymatopus Wallengren, (de Geer, 1778)1869 – 1 mespilicola – 1 Stainton, 1849 hecta (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775) – 1 ariella – 1 Hepialus fabricius, 1775 cotoneastri (Frey, 1856) – 1 Herrich-Schäffer, 1860 humuli (Linnaeus, 1758) – 1 floslactella – 1 sensu Klimesch, 1948 carpinella – 3 NEPTICULOIDE (Linnaeus,A 1758) – 1 tityrella (Haworth, 1828) – 1 hemargyrella (Heinemann, 1862) – 1 Simplimorpha scoble, 1983 salicis (Stainton, 1854) – 1 NEPTICULIDAE sensu Zeller, 1848 promissa auritella – 1 Enteucha Meyrick, 1915 vimineticola (Stainton, 1854) – 1 Skala, 1939 acetosae (Staudinger, 1871) – 1 myrtillella – 3 Stigmella schrank, 1802 benanderella (Frey, 1856) – 11 naturnella (Stainton, 1854) – 6, 37 obliquella (Stainton,1857) – 1 lapponica pallidiciliella (Wolf, 1955) – 8 confusella (Klimesch, 1936) – 8, 37 trimaculella (Heinemann, 1862) – 6, 37 freyella (Wocke, 1862) – 3 assimilella Klimesch, 1946 – 11 tiliae (Wood & Walsingham, 1894) – 6, 37 sorbi (Haworth, 1828) – 1 betulicola (Heyden, 1858) – 1 cotoneastrella (Zeller, 1848) – 1 nivenburgensis (Frey, 1856) – 1 plagicolella (Stainton, 1861) – 3 Weber, 1936 sakhalinella (Stainton, 1856) – 1 lemniscella – 3 (Preissecker, 1942) – 8 (Stainton, 1854) – 1 Folia faunistica Slovaca, Puplesis,2010, 15 (9): 198461–93 – 8 (Zeller, 1839) 62 marginicolella septembrella fulvomacula atrifrontella Stainton, 1853 aurella – 1 liebwerdella (Stainton, 1849) – 1 Skala, 1936 fragariella – 1 longicaudella (Stainton, 1851) – 1 gei (Fabricius, 1775) – 3 amani Zimmermann, 1940 – 1 Heinemann, 1860 splendidissimella – 1 Klimesch, 1953 – 8 Wocke, 1871 reichli pretiosa – 1 intimella Svensson, 1966 – 8 bollii (Herrich-Schäffer,1855) – 1 hannoverella A. & Z. Laštůvka, 1998 – 14 aeneofasciella (Heinemann, 1862) – 9 (Zeller, 1848) – 6, 37 Frey, 1873 turbidella tormentillella – 3 klimeschi (Glitz, 1872) – 1 dryadella (Herrich-Schäffer, 1855) – 1 argyropeza (Zeller, 1848) – 1 poterii (Herrich-Schäffer, 1860) – 3 preisseckeri (Skala, 1933) – 1 filipendulae (Hofmann, 1868) – 4 caradjai (Zeller, 1839) – 1 ulmariae (Stainton, 1857) – 6, 37 gilvipennella (Klimesch, 1941) – 8, 37 lediella (Wocke, 1871) – 6, 37 rufifrontella (Groschke, 1944) – 6, 37 (Wocke, 1879) – 6, 37 incognitella nigrosparsella (Klimesch, 1946) – 8 (Schleich, 1867) – 6, 37 pomella albifasciella (Caradja, 1920) – 65 (Herrich-Schäffer, 1855) Klimesch, 1940 perpygmaeella cerris – 1 Vaughan, 1858 – 1 pygmaeella contorta (Heinemann, 1871) – 1 (Doubleday, 1859) – 3 hemargyrella subbimaculella (Zimmermann, 1944) – 2 Haworth, 1828 – 1 speciosa bistrimaculella van Nieukerken, 1985 – 8 (Kollar, 1832) – 1 lonicerarum heringi (Haworth, 1828) – 1 (Frey, 1857) – 2 Heyden, 1861 basiguttella liechtensteini – 3 (Frey, 1856) – 3 svenssoni spiraeae (Toll, 1934) – 3 (Heinemann, 1862) – 1 szoecsiella agrimoniae (Zimmermann, 1944) – 3 (Johansson, 1971) – 10 zangherii angulifasciella Gregor & Povolný, 1983 – 32 dorsiguttella (Borkowski, 1972) – 14 schleichiella (Frey, 1858) – 1 ruficapitella (Klimesch, 1951) – 3 atricollis (Stainton, 1849) – 1 atricapitella (Johansson, 1971) – 8 Frey, 1870 staphyleae – 3 samiatella (Haworth, 1828) – 1 arcuatella (Stainton, 1857) – 1 roborella (Haworth, 1828) – 1 Zimmermann, 1944 rubivora – 1 eberhardi (Zeller, 1839) – 1 spinosella (Herrich-Schäffer, 1855) – 3 Acalyptris Meyrick, (Johansson, 1921 1971) – 8 mahalebella (Wocke, 1860) – 1 loranthella (Johansson, 1971) – 6, 37 occultella (Joannis, 1908) – 1 Trifurcula Zeller, 1848 argentipedella (Klimesch, 1936) – 6 melanoptera (Klimesch, 1937) – 6, 37 minimella (Linnaeus, 1767) – 3 headleyella Zeller, 1839 – 1 van Nieukerken & Puplesis, 1991 – 8 magna (Zetterstedt, 1839) – 10 (Stainton, 1854) – 8 thymi Opostega Zeller, 1839 A. & Z. Laštůvka, 1997 – 12, 37 bleonella OPOSTEGIDAEsalaciella (Szőcs, 1965) – 8 cryptella spatulella (Chrétien, 1904) – 8 eurema Pseudopostega (Treitschke, kozlov, 1985 1833) – 1 (Stainton, 1856) – 8 ortneri auritella Herrich-Schäffer, 1855 – 1 (Tutt, 1899) – 6 austriaca crepusculella subnitidella (Klimesch, 1951) – 11 (Hübner, 1813) – 6 josefklimeschi
Recommended publications
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects

    ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects

    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
  • Lepidoptera Checklist Cr1a

    Lepidoptera Checklist Cr1a

    Seznam motýlů České republiky Checklist of Lepidoptera of the Czech Republic (Insecta: Lepidoptera) Zdeněk Laštůvka* & Jan Liška** *Ústav zoologie, rybářství, hydrobiologie a včelařství AF MZLU v Brně Department of Zoology, Fisheries, Hydrobiology and Apiculture, Mendel University of Agriculture and Forestry in Brno **Výzkumný ústav lesního hospodářství a myslivosti Jíloviště-Strnady Forestry and Game Management Research Institute Jíloviště-Strnady 1 Úvodm Předložený seznam přináší aktuální přehled druhů motýlůČeské republiky. Zahrnuje druhy v současnosti nebo minulosti dlouhodobě přítomné, migranty, druhy s nestálým nebo nepravidelným výskytem i druhy synantropní. Ze seznamu jsou naopak vyloučeny druhy uváděné na základě chybného určení, druhy, jejichž výskyt není spolehlivě doložen a ojedinělé nálezy zavlečených jedinců cizích druhů bez následného vzniku trvalých populací. UUUSeznam vychází z katalogů motýlů Moravy a české části Slezka (Laštůvka, 1993) a Čech (Novák & Liška, 1997), resp. celé České republiky (Laštůvka, 1998), přičemž jsou zohledněny systematické a nomenklatorické změny, ke kterým od vydání těchto publikací došlo. V zájmu přesnějšího vymezení dosud známého rozšíření v České republice jsou označeny druhy, jejichž známý výskyt je omezen jen na území termofytika nebo oreofytika. UUUPoznámky k výskytu některých druhů doplnili a tím k co neúplnější podobě tohoto seznamu přispěli pánové V. Bělín, J. Bezděk, T. Dobrovský, M. Dvořák, G. Elsner, V. Elsner, A. Gottwald, F. Gregor, V. Hula, M. Janovský, J. Jaroš, T. Jirgl F. Kopeček, J. Korynta, T. Kuras, A. Laštůvka, J. Marek, L. Maršík, J. Němý, I. Novák, M. Petrů, P. Potocký, † D. Povolný, J. Procházka, J. Sitek, J. Skyva, V. Štolc, J. Šumpich, J. Uřičář, J. Vávra, V. Vrabec, M. Žemlička a další entomologové. K některým taxonomickým a nomenklatorickým problémům se laskavě vyjádřili J.
  • Izatha (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea: Oecophoridae)

    Izatha (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea: Oecophoridae)

    Hoare, R. J. B. 2010: Izatha (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea: Oecophoridae). Fauna of New Zealand 65, 201 pp. The Copyright notice printed on page 4 applies to the use of this PDF. This PDF is not to be posted on websites. Links should be made to: FNZ.LandcareResearch.co.nz EDITORIAL BOARD Dr R. M. Emberson, c/- Department of Ecology, P.O. Box 84, Lincoln University, New Zealand Dr M. J. Fletcher, Director of the Collections, NSW Agricultural Scientific Collections Unit, Forest Road, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia Dr R. J. B. Hoare, Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Dr M.-C. Larivière, Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Mr R. L. Palma, Natural Environment Department, Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, P.O. Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand SERIES EDITOR Dr T. K. Crosby, Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Fauna of New Zealand Ko te Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa Number / Nama 65 Izatha (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea: Oecophoridae) Robert J. B. Hoare Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland 1142, New Zealand [email protected] with colour plates by B.E. Rhode Manaak i W h e n u a P R E S S Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand 2010 4 Hoare (2010): Izatha (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea: Oecophoridae) Copyright © Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd 2010 No part of this work covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping information retrieval systems, or otherwise) without the written permission of the publisher.
  • History of Taxonomy

    History of Taxonomy

    History of Taxonomy The history of taxonomy dates back to the origin of human language. Western scientific taxonomy started in Greek some hundred years BC and are here divided into prelinnaean and postlinnaean. The most important works are cited and the progress of taxonomy (with the focus on botanical taxonomy) are described up to the era of the Swedish botanist Carl Linnaeus, who founded modern taxonomy. The development after Linnaeus is characterized by a taxonomy that increasingly have come to reflect the paradigm of evolution. The used characters have extended from morphological to molecular. Nomenclatural rules have developed strongly during the 19th and 20th century, and during the last decade traditional nomenclature has been challenged by advocates of the Phylocode. Mariette Manktelow Dept of Systematic Biology Evolutionary Biology Centre Uppsala University Norbyv. 18D SE-752 36 Uppsala E-mail: [email protected] 1. Pre-Linnaean taxonomy 1.1. Earliest taxonomy Taxonomy is as old as the language skill of mankind. It has always been essential to know the names of edible as well as poisonous plants in order to communicate acquired experiences to other members of the family and the tribe. Since my profession is that of a systematic botanist, I will focus my lecture on botanical taxonomy. A taxonomist should be aware of that apart from scientific taxonomy there is and has always been folk taxonomy, which is of great importance in, for example, ethnobiological studies. When we speak about ancient taxonomy we usually mean the history in the Western world, starting with Romans and Greek. However, the earliest traces are not from the West, but from the East.
  • Pqiau .M U « U U I U .W M

    Pqiau .M U « U U I U .W M

    LE. :2: . 1: . 3': .H;3:T.!:u "1133‘ c’ HM! in l 33;: : AH." :1. azlt. 1.4:. 31.)»)..(35. 0...”: .§:\ 5‘31}... Sic... J z... ‘ 1.. t pQIau .m u «u u uI .w m .1. if. ‘flvéu. , a. THESlS /) ,1 (i (.7 This is to certify that the dissertation entitled HIGHER CLASSIFICATION, HOST PLANT SELECTION AND FEEDING STRATEGY IN MOMPHINAE (LEPIDOPTERA: GELECHIOIDEA: COLEOPHORIDAE) presented by John H. Wilterding III has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Ph . D . degree in Entomology ~ Major professor Date July 24, 2000 MSU is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution 0-12771 LIBRARY M'Chlgan State University PLACE IN RETURN Box to remove this checkout from your record. To AVOID FINES return on or before date due. MAY BE RECALLED with earlier due date if requested. DATE DUE DATE DUE DATE DUE 6/01 cJCIFiC/DateDuepSS—pts HIGHER CLASSIFICATION, HOST PLANT SELECTION AND FEEDING STRATEGY IN THE MOMPHINAE (LEPIDOPTERA: GELECHIOIDEA: COLEOPHORIDAE) By John H. Wilterding IH A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Entomology 2000 ABSTRACT HIGHER CLASSIFICATION, HOST PLANT SELECTION AND FEEDING STRATEGY IN THE MOMPHINAE (LEPIDOPTERA: GELECHIOIDEA: COLEOPHORIDAE) By John H. Wilterding III The higher classification and evolutionary biology for Nearctic and Palearctic Momphinae is completely revised by cladistic analysis of morphological characters of the adults. A total of 69 ingroup taxa were used along with four outgroup taxa. Approximately 61 morphological characters were coded as unordered binary or multistate characters. A total of 24 equally parsimonious trees of 181 steps (CI=0.6348) were found.
  • Nuevos Táxones Animales Descritos En La Península Manuela Guerrero, Soledad Moreno, Adelaida Orbiso Y Ibérica Y Macaronesia Entre 1994 Y 1997 Mª Olga Sánchez

    Nuevos Táxones Animales Descritos En La Península Manuela Guerrero, Soledad Moreno, Adelaida Orbiso Y Ibérica Y Macaronesia Entre 1994 Y 1997 Mª Olga Sánchez

    Graellsia, 51: 163-215 (1996) NOTICIA DE NUEVOS TÁXONES PARA LA CIENCIA EN EL ÁMBITO ÍBERO-BALEAR Y MACARONÉSICO Nuevos táxones animales descritos en la Península Manuela Guerrero, Soledad Moreno, Adelaida Orbiso y Ibérica y Macaronesia entre 1994 y 1997 Mª Olga Sánchez. Importante, sin ninguna duda, ha sido asimismo la contribución de la Sociedad Española de José FERNÁNDEZ Malacología, cuya biblioteca siempre ha estado a nuestro Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, C.S.I.C. José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2. 28006. Madrid. alcance gracias a la amabilidad de su bibliotecario, Rafael Araujo. Debemos mencionar, especialmente, la ayuda de José Templado, quién “buceó” en la biblioteca del Esta contribución es, por un lado, continuación de Instituto Español de Oceanografía en busca de referen- una similar aparecida en el volumen anterior, y, por otro, cias, principalmente de organismos marinos. No sería un intento de ampliación a todos los grupos animales, ya honesto olvidar a todos aquellos investigadores, naciona- que aparentemente el llamamiento efectuado desde las les y extranjeros, que han tenido a bien enviarnos copias páginas del volumen antes citado no ha parecido tener de contribuciones propias y ajenas, o nos han ofrecido su una buena acogida. A pesar de todo, reiteramos dicho lla- colaboración en cualquier forma (se relacionan por orden mamiento y proponemos, como solución alternativa, que alfabético): Miguel Ángel Alonso Zarazaga, Miguel los autores de nuevos táxones envíen a la secretaría de Carles-Tolrá, Miguel Escuer, Ana Isabel Fernández Graellsia una separata (o fotocopia) de sus trabajos; así, Perdices, Mario García París, Damià Jaume, J.H. Martin, además de poder elaborar estas notas con mayor facili- Carolina Martín Albaladejo, Juan Manuel Nieto Nafría, dad, podremos ir formando una pequeña biblioteca.
  • The Sphinx Moths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) of Nebraska

    The Sphinx Moths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) of Nebraska

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies Nebraska Academy of Sciences 1997 The Sphinx Moths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) of Nebraska Charlie Messenger University of Nebraska State Museum, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tnas Part of the Life Sciences Commons Messenger, Charlie, "The Sphinx Moths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) of Nebraska" (1997). Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies. 72. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tnas/72 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Nebraska Academy of Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societiesy b an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 1997. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences, 24: 89-141 THE SPHINX MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA: SPHINGIDAE) OF NEBRASKA Charlie Messenger University of Nebraska State Museum Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0514 elM @ UNLlNFO.UNl.EDU ABSTRACT Most night-blooming flowers have muted colors, such as white or yellow, and have heavy fragrances that A faunal study of the sphinx moths (Lepidoptera: attract moths. Most adult sphinx moths have a long, Sphingidae) of Nebraska is presented. An overview of the hollow proboscis that is used for feeding. It varies in family and its two subfamilies is given as well as descriptions length from about three times the body length to re­ of the adults and, when known, the larvae. Each of the 20 duced and non-functional (Hodges 1971).
  • On the New and Rare Lepidoptera in Serbian Fauna

    On the New and Rare Lepidoptera in Serbian Fauna

    Зборник Матице српске за природне науке / Matica Srpska J. Nat. Sci. Novi Sad, № 129, 73—83, 2015 UDC 595.78(497.11) DOI: 10.2298/ZMSPN1529073J Predrag N. JAKŠIĆ* University of Niš, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology and Ecology, Višegradska 33, 18000 Niš, Serbia ON THE NEW AND RARE LEPIDOPTERA IN SERBIAN FAUNA ABSTRACT: New distributional records are given for eight Lepidoptera species in Serbia. Ethmia lugubris (Staudinger, 1879) (fam. Ethmiidae) is reported in Serbia for the first time. Larval mines of Stigmella centifoliella (Zeller, 1848) (fam. Nepticulidae), photos of Hypercalia citrinalis (Scopoli, 1763) (fam. Amphisbatidae) and Cryphia amasina (Draudt, 1931) (fam. Noctuidae), as well as male genitalia of Leptidea reali Reissinger (1988) – Leptidea juvernica Williams, 1946 complex (fam. Pieridae) and Cryphia amasina are presented. UTM 10 x 10 km distribution map for three species is provided. KEYWORDS: Lepidoptera, Republic of Serbia, fauna INTRODUCTION The latest comprehensive checklist of Serbian Lepidoptera [Zečević 1996] revealed, among other things, that many families, genera and species had not been sufficiently investigated in the past, as well as that many species had not been found again for even few decades. The knowledge of the species is still insufficient: 1,355 species [Zečević 1996] compared to 4,104 species in Roma- nia [Rákosy et al., 2003], or 3,598 species in Slovakia [Pastorális et al., 2013], etc. As a result of a recent field research carried out predominantly in eastern Serbia, some interesting data for eight Lepidoptera species have been found. These faunistic data are presented in this paper. Among the recorded species, one Microlepidoptera species has not been known in Serbian fauna so far.
  • Bibliografía Lepidopterológica Andaluza (1836-2002) (Insecta:Lepidoptera)

    Bibliografía Lepidopterológica Andaluza (1836-2002) (Insecta:Lepidoptera)

    Boletín de la SAE nº 6 (2003): 5-77 ISSN: 1578-1666 Bibliografía Lepidopterológica Andaluza (1836-2002) (Insecta:Lepidoptera) Manuel HUERTAS DIONISIO 1 1 Apartado de Correos nº 47 21080 Huelva RESUMEN: Se hace un listado bibliográfico con los trabajos, artículos, notas y libros, españoles y extranjeros, que tratan de la fauna de lepidópteros de Andalucía. PALABRAS CLAVE: Bibliografía, Lepidópteros, Andalucía, España. SUMMARY: It is made a bibliographic list with the spanish and foreign works, articles, notes and books that deal with the faune of lepidoptera from Andalusia. KEY WORDS: Bibliography, Lepidoptera, Andalusia, Spain. INTRODUCCIÓN El motivo que nos ha movido a publicar estas reseñas bibliográficas de mariposas andaluzas, es por el desconocimiento de las citas de las especies de este orden en las publicaciones españolas y extranjeras. En los suplementos publicados por SOCECO y ahora por SAE -“Lepidópteros de Andalucía”- , hemos encontrado esta falta de información por las pocas citas de las especies tratadas. De todas formas las referencias de los lepidópteros de Andalucía, han estado y están muy desperdigadas en publicaciones extranjeras, por eso era necesário una recopilación de todas ellas, junto con las españolas. Este desconocimiento puede dar lugar a que citemos alguna especie como nueva para España o Andalucía, sin saber si ha estado citada antes, - 5 - M. HUERTAS DIONISIO igual que un extranjero que capture alguna especie andaluza y la cite como nueva, sin consultar los boletines de las Sociedades entomológicas o cualquier otro medio que trate de estos insectos, y comprobar que estaba citada antes. Por eso AGENJO (Insuffisance de l´information au sujet de la litterature lépidoptèrologique de l´Espagne.
  • LCSH Section O

    LCSH Section O

    O, Inspector (Fictitious character) O-erh-kʾun Ho (Mongolia) O-wee-kay-no Indians USE Inspector O (Fictitious character) USE Orhon River (Mongolia) USE Oowekeeno Indians O,O-dimethyl S-phthalimidomethyl phosphorodithioate O-erh-kʾun River (Mongolia) O-wen-kʻo (Tribe) USE Phosmet USE Orhon River (Mongolia) USE Evenki (Asian people) O., Ophelia (Fictitious character) O-erh-to-ssu Basin (China) O-wen-kʻo language USE Ophelia O. (Fictitious character) USE Ordos Desert (China) USE Evenki language O/100 (Bomber) O-erh-to-ssu Desert (China) Ō-yama (Kanagawa-ken, Japan) USE Handley Page Type O (Bomber) USE Ordos Desert (China) USE Ōyama (Kanagawa-ken, Japan) O/400 (Bomber) O family (Not Subd Geog) O2 Arena (London, England) USE Handley Page Type O (Bomber) Ó Flannabhra family UF North Greenwich Arena (London, England) O and M instructors USE Flannery family BT Arenas—England USE Orientation and mobility instructors O.H. Ivie Reservoir (Tex.) O2 Ranch (Tex.) Ó Briain family UF Ivie Reservoir (Tex.) BT Ranches—Texas USE O'Brien family Stacy Reservoir (Tex.) OA (Disease) Ó Broin family BT Reservoirs—Texas USE Osteoarthritis USE Burns family O Hine Hukatere (N.Z.) OA-14 (Amphibian plane) O.C. Fisher Dam (Tex.) USE Franz Josef Glacier/Kā Roimata o Hine USE Grumman Widgeon (Amphibian plane) BT Dams—Texas Hukatere (N.Z.) Oa language O.C. Fisher Lake (Tex.) O-kee-pa (Religious ceremony) USE Pamoa language UF Culbertson Deal Reservoir (Tex.) BT Mandan dance Oab Luang National Park (Thailand) San Angelo Lake (Tex.) Mandan Indians—Rites and ceremonies USE ʻUtthayān hǣng Chāt ʻŌ̜p Lūang (Thailand) San Angelo Reservoir (Tex.) O.L.
  • List of Hostplants of Moths

    List of Hostplants of Moths

    LIST OF HOSTPLANTS OF MOTHS Sr.No Name of species Host Plant Family Attevidae 1 Atteva fabriciella Swederus, 1787 Acacia sp., Ailanthus sp. Family Brahmeaedidae 2 Brahmaea wallichii Gray, 1831 Ligustrum sp. Family Callidulidae 3 Pterodecta anchora Pagenstecher, 1877 Ferns Family Cossidae 4 Azygophleps scalaris Fabricius, 1775 Sesbania bispinosa Callicarpa sp., Clerodendrum sp., Gmelina sp., Tectona sp. , Erythrina sp., Sesbania sp., Spathodea 5 Duomitus ceramicus (Walker 1865) sp., and Duabanga sp. Coffee, Tea, Casuarina, Erythroxylum, Acalypha, Phyllanthus, Hydnocarpus, Annona, Cinnamomum, Persea, Phoebe, Amherstia, Cassia, Pericopsis, Xylia, Gossypium, Hibiscus, Cedrela, Chukrasia, Melia, Swietenia, Psidium, Grevillea, Crataegus, Eriobotrya, Citrus, Santalum, Filicium, Nephelium, 6 Polyphagozerra coffeae (Nietner, 1861) Schleichera, Clerodendrum, Tectona, Vitex. Cassia fistula, C. javanica, C. renigera, Senna 7 Xyleutes persona (le Guillou, 1841) siamea, Premna sp. 8 Xyleutes strix Linnaeus, 1758 Sesbania grandiflora 9 Zeurrora indica (Herrich-Schäffer, 1854) Phoebe sp., Litsea monopetala 10 Zeuzera multistrigata Moore, 1881 Cherry Family Crambidae 11 Aetholix flavibasalis Guenée, 1854 Duabanga grandiflora, Mangifera indica Erythrina vespertilio, E. Variegata, E. suberosa, E. 12 Agathodes ostentalis Geyer, 1837 subumbrans Syzygium nervosum, Lagerstroemia microcarpa, L. 13 Agrotera basinotata Hampson, 1891 parviflora, L. speciosa, Pavetta indica 14 Ancylolomia sp. Grasses 15 Antigastra catalaunalis (Duponchel, 1833) Sesame(Sesamum indicum).
  • Worldwide Host Plants of the Highly Polyphagous, Invasive Epiphyas Postvittana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Author(S) :E

    Worldwide Host Plants of the Highly Polyphagous, Invasive Epiphyas Postvittana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Author(S) :E

    Worldwide Host Plants of the Highly Polyphagous, Invasive Epiphyas postvittana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Author(s) :E. G. Brockerhoff, D. M. Suckling, C. E. Ecroyd, S. J. Wagstaff, M. C. Raabe, R. V. Dowell, and C. H. Wearing Source: Journal of Economic Entomology, 104(5):1514-1524. 2011. Published By: Entomological Society of America DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/EC11160 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1603/EC11160 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. ECOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR Worldwide Host Plants of the Highly Polyphagous, Invasive Epiphyas postvittana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) E. G. BROCKERHOFF,1,2 D. M. SUCKLING,3 C. E. ECROYD,4 S. J. WAGSTAFF,5 M. C. RAABE,6 7 8 R. V. DOWELL, AND C. H. WEARING J. Econ. Entomol. 104(5): 1514Ð1524 (2011); DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/EC11160 ABSTRACT The light brown apple moth, Epiphyas postvittana (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Tortri- cidae), is a highly successful biological invader.