DOCSLIB.ORG

Lepidoptera Checklist Cr1a

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lepidoptera Checklist Cr1a Seznam motýlů České republiky Checklist of Lepidoptera of the Czech Republic (Insecta: Lepidoptera) Zdeněk Laštůvka* & Jan Liška** *Ústav zoologie, rybářství, hydrobiologie a včelařství AF MZLU v Brně Department of Zoology, Fisheries, Hydrobiology and Apiculture, Mendel University of Agriculture and Forestry in Brno **Výzkumný ústav lesního hospodářství a myslivosti Jíloviště-Strnady Forestry and Game Management Research Institute Jíloviště-Strnady 1 Úvodm Předložený seznam přináší aktuální přehled druhů motýlůČeské republiky. Zahrnuje druhy v současnosti nebo minulosti dlouhodobě přítomné, migranty, druhy s nestálým nebo nepravidelným výskytem i druhy synantropní. Ze seznamu jsou naopak vyloučeny druhy uváděné na základě chybného určení, druhy, jejichž výskyt není spolehlivě doložen a ojedinělé nálezy zavlečených jedinců cizích druhů bez následného vzniku trvalých populací. UUUSeznam vychází z katalogů motýlů Moravy a české části Slezka (Laštůvka, 1993) a Čech (Novák & Liška, 1997), resp. celé České republiky (Laštůvka, 1998), přičemž jsou zohledněny systematické a nomenklatorické změny, ke kterým od vydání těchto publikací došlo. V zájmu přesnějšího vymezení dosud známého rozšíření v České republice jsou označeny druhy, jejichž známý výskyt je omezen jen na území termofytika nebo oreofytika. UUUPoznámky k výskytu některých druhů doplnili a tím k co neúplnější podobě tohoto seznamu přispěli pánové V. Bělín, J. Bezděk, T. Dobrovský, M. Dvořák, G. Elsner, V. Elsner, A. Gottwald, F. Gregor, V. Hula, M. Janovský, J. Jaroš, T. Jirgl F. Kopeček, J. Korynta, T. Kuras, A. Laštůvka, J. Marek, L. Maršík, J. Němý, I. Novák, M. Petrů, P. Potocký, † D. Povolný, J. Procházka, J. Sitek, J. Skyva, V. Štolc, J. Šumpich, J. Uřičář, J. Vávra, V. Vrabec, M. Žemlička a další entomologové. K některým taxonomickým a nomenklatorickým problémům se laskavě vyjádřili J. Buszko (Toruń), M. Fibiger (SorØ)aO. Karsholt (Kodaň). Introduction This checklist is a contemporary review of moths and butterflies of the Czech Republic. It comprises species occurring at present or at least in the past, migrants as well as species showing irregular occurrence, and synanthropic species. The species whose identifications were incorrect or doubtful as well as species the occurrence of which is not satisfactorily documented, similarly as occasional finds of introduced species developing no subsequent local populations are excluded from the list. UUUThe list is based on former lepidopteran catalogues of Moravia and the Czech part of Silesia (Laštůvka, 1993), Bohemia (Novák & Liška, 1997) and the whole Czech Republic (Laštůvka, 1998). The later taxonomic and nomenclatural changes are considered. For a more understandable delimitation of the known distribution in the Czech Republic, species known only on the territory of the thermophyticum and oreophyticum are denoted. UUUVarious supplements to the species list were offered by several other lepidopterists, especially by V. Bělín, J. Bezděk, T. Dobrovský, M. Dvořák, G. Elsner, V. Elsner, A. Gottwald, F. Gregor, V. Hula, M. Janovský, J. Jaroš, T. Jirgl, F. Kopeček, J. Korynta, T. Kuras, A. Laštůvka, J. Marek, L. Maršík, J. Němý, I. Novák, M. Petrů, P. Potocký, † D. Povolný, J. Procházka, J. Sitek, J. Skyva, V. Štolc, J. Šumpich, J. Uřičář, J. Vávra, V. Vrabec and M. Žemlička. Some taxonomic or nomenclatural problems were kindly expressed or elucidated by J. Buszko (Toruń), M. Fibiger (SorØ) and O. Karsholt (Kobenhavn). Zkratky / Abbreviations B - Bohemia M - Moravia a část Slezska patřící České republice / Moravia and the Czech part of Silesia T - termofytikum / thermophyticum O - oreofytikum / oreophyticum I - indrodukovaný / indroduced S - synantropní nebo převážně synantropní výskyt / synanthropic or mostly synanthropic occurrence M - migrant D - nezvěstný / disappeared X - vymřelý / extinct b, m - jednotlivý neopakovaný nález (nálezy) / single unrepeated record (records) (125/123/120) - počty zjištěných druhů v CZ/B/M / number of species recorded in CZ/B/M 2 Z E U G L O P T E R A anomalella (Goeze, 1783) BM incognitella (Her.-Sch., 1855) BM M i c r o p t e r i g o i d e a = aeneella (Heinemann, 1862) = pomella (Vaughan, 1858) Micropterigidae (8/7/8) = fletcheri (Tutt, 1899) = mali (Hering, 1932) Micropterix Hübner, 1825 centifoliella (Zeller, 1848) BM perpygmaeella (Doubleday, 1859) BM allionella (Fabricius, 1794) BM ulmivora (Fologne, 1860) BM = pygmaeella (Haworth, 1828) calthella (Linnaeus, 1761) BM = ulmifoliae (Hering, 1931) hemargyrella (Kollar, 1832) BM aruncella (Scopoli, 1763) BM = ulmicola (Hering, 1932) = basalella (Herrich-Schäffer, 1855) myrtetella Zeller, 1850 MT26 ulmiphaga (Preissecker, 1942) BT MT lonicerarum (Frey, 1857) BM aureatella (Scopoli, 1763) BM = gracilivora (Skala, 1942) basiguttella (Heinemann, 1862) BM = ammanella (Hübner, 1810) viscerella (Stainton, 1853) BT MT zangherii (Klimesch, 1951) MT osthelderi Heath, 1975 BM sanguisorbae (Wocke, 1865) B28M dorsiguttella (Johansson, 1971) BT MT schaefferi Heath, 1975 B M53 thuringiaca (Petry, 1904) BM ruficapitella (Haworth, 1828) BM = ammanella auct., nec Hübner, 1810 rolandi van Nieukerken, 1990 MT atricapitella (Haworth, 1828) BT MT tunbergella (Fabricius, 1787) BM = spinosissimae sensu Klimesch, 1951, samiatella (Zeller, 1839) BM nec Waters, 1928 roborella (Johansson, 1971) BM G L O S S A T A paradoxa (Frey, 1858) BM eberhardi (Johansson, 1971) BT MT D A C N O N Y P H A = nitidella (Heinemann, 1862) Acalyptris Meyrick, 1921 E r i o c r a n i o i d e a regiella (Herrich-Schäffer, 1855) BM loranthella (Klimesch, 1937) MT Eriocraniidae (8/8/7) = corvimontana (Hering, 1935) Trifurcula Zeller, 1848 Dyseriocrania Spuler, 1910 crataegella (Klimesch, 1936) BM melanoptera van Nieukerken & BT MT subpurpurella (Haworth, 1828) BM hahniella (Wörz, 1937) B4 MT Puplesis, 1991 = fastuosella (Zeller, 1839) magdalenae (Klimesch, 1950) BM headleyella (Stainton, 1854) BM Eriocrania Zeller, 1851 nylandriella (Tengström, 1848) BM thymi (Szöcs, 1965) BT MT28 chrysolepidella Zeller, 1851 B = aucupariae (Frey, 1857) cryptella (Stainton, 1856) BT MT unimaculella (Zetterstedt, 1839) BM oxyacanthella (Stainton, 1854) BM eurema (Tutt, 1899) BM sparrmannella (Bosc, 1791) BM = aeneella auct., nec Hein., 1862 austriaca van Nieukerken, 1990 MT salopiella (Stainton, 1854) B M60 = cotoneastri (Sorhagen, 1922) subnitidella (Duponchel, 1843) BT MT cicatricella (Zetterstedt, 1839) BM pyri (Glitz, 1865) BM josefklimeschi van Nieukerken, 1990 MT = purpurella (Haworth, 1828), minusculella (Her.-Sch., 1855) BM silviae van Nieukerken, 1990 MT26 nec Thunberg, 1788 stettinensis (Heinemann, 1871) B60M19 pallidella (Duponchel, 1843) BT MT = haworthi Bradley, 1966 desperatella (Frey, 1856) BM immundella (Zeller, 1839) BM sangii (Wood, 1891) B M55 = pyricola (Wocke, 1877) corothamni Z.& A. Laštůvka, 1994 MT22 semipurpurella (Stephens, 1835) BM hybnerella (Hübner, 1796) BM moravica Z.& A. Laštůvka, 1994 B M22 = gratiosella (Duponchel, 1843) chamaecytisi Z.& A. Laštůvka, 1994 BT27MT22 E X O P O R I A = ignobilella (Stainton, 1849) serotinella Herrich-Schäffer, 1855 BT58M H e p i a l o i d e a mespilicola (Frey, 1856) BM beirnei Puplesis, 1984 M Hepialidae (5/5/5) = ariella (Herrich-Schäffer, 1860) Parafomoria van Nieukerken, 1983 Hepialus Fabricius, 1775 floslactella (Haworth, 1828) BM helianthemella (Her.-Sch., 1860) BM sylvinus (Linnaeus, 1761) BM carpinella (Heinemann, 1862) BM Bohemannia Stainton, 1859 lupulinus (Linnaeus, 1758) BM tityrella (Stainton, 1854) BM pulverosella (Stainton, 1849) BM fusconebulosus (De Geer, 1778) BM = turicella (Herrich-Schäffer, 1855) auriciliella (Joannis, 1908) MT27 hecta (Linnaeus, 1758) BM salicis (Stainton, 1854) BM Ectoedemia Busck, 1907 humuli (Linnaeus, 1758) BM = auritella (Skala, 1939) sericopeza (Zeller, 1839) BM vimineticola (Frey, 1856) B M23 louisella (Sircom, 1849) BM H E T E R O N E U R A myrtillella (Stainton, 1857) BM decentella (Herrich-Schäffer, 1855) BM MONOTRYSIA zelleriella (Snellen, 1875) b weaveri (Stainton, 1855) BM N e p t i c u l o i d e a obliquella (Heinemann, 1862) BM septembrella (Stainton, 1849) BM Nepticulidae (130/111/127) pallidiciliella Klimesch, 1946 B M23 viridissimella (Caradja, 1920) MT57 Enteucha Meyrick, 1915 trimaculella (Haworth, 1828) BM atrifrontella (Stainton, 1851) BM acetosae (Stainton, 1854) BM = populella (Herrich-Schäffer, 1855) liebwerdella Zimmermann, 1940 BM Stigmella Schrank, 1802 assimilella (Zeller, 1848) BM longicaudella Klimesch, 1953 BM naturnella (Klimesch, 1936)B28M sorbi (Stainton, 1861) BM amani Svensson, 1966 BM lapponica (Wocke, 1862) BM = cotoneastrella (Weber, 1936) intimella (Zeller, 1848) BM confusella (Wood & Wals., 1894) BM plagicolella (Stainton, 1854) BM hannoverella (Glitz, 1872) BM freyella (Heyden, 1858) BM lemniscella (Zeller, 1839) BM turbidella (Zeller, 1848) BT MT tiliae (Frey, 1856) BM = marginicolella (Stainton, 1853) klimeschi (Skala, 1933) BT MT betulicola (Stainton, 1856) BM = fulvomacula (Skala, 1936) argyropeza (Zeller,1839) BM nivenburgensis (Preissecker, 1942) MT continuella (Stainton, 1856) BM preisseckeri (Klimesch, 1941) MT sakhalinella Puplesis, 1984 BM aurella (Fabricius, 1775) BM caradjai (Groschke, 1944) BT26MT = distinguenda auct., = fragariella (Heinemann, 1860) gilvipennella (Klimesch, 1946) MT nec Heinemann, 1862 = gei (Wocke, 1871) rufifrontella (Caradja, 1920) MT luteella (Stainton, 1857) BM splendidissimella (Her.-Sch., 1855) BM = nigrosparsella (Klimesch, 1940) glutinosae (Stainton, 1858) BM pretiosa (Heinemann, 1862) B42 albifasciella (Heinemann, 1871)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tercera Parte (1972- 1997)
    TERCERA PARTE (1972- 1997) Los muchachos de familias acomodadas se hacen ingenieros o médicos. Los vascos se retiran del mar. Pío Baroja [Las inquietudes de Shanti Andía] 97 Evolución y cambios 1. EVOLUCION DE LA S.C. ARANZADI Después de 25 años de trabajos, JESUS ELOSEGUI pide el relevo como Secretario General de la S.C. Aranzadi, en enero de 1972, dejando atrás una labor silenciosa, eficaz y duradera. Durante este cuarto de siglo la Sociedad se ha convertido en una hermosa realidad, con las Secciones de trabajo a pleno rendi- miento, una cifra de socios que supera el millar y medio, sus inquietudes y sus investigaciones, algu- nas de ellas de proyección internacional. Este nuevo talante de la Sociedad va a quedar definitivamente consolidado en el periodo que presentamos y exami- namos a continuación. En la Asamblea General de 1972 se vuelve a Foto 37. Visita de los Dres. ARHENIUS y WEINBERG a raíz de la cam- plantear el viejo tema de la necesidad de una Univer- pana contra la implantación de centrales nucleares en el País sidad para Guipúzcoa y sus relaciones con la Socie- Vasco. De izquierda a derecha: F. LEIZAOLA, DR. A. WEINBERG y dad. Señora. Dr. E. ARHENIUS y J.M. LARRAÑAGA (Foto F. LEIZAOLA, 1978). En otro orden de cosas, en el horizonte del País Vasco comenzaba a tomar cuerpo un proyecto in- quietante, al que la Sociedad no podía sentirse ajena. En 1974 presenta una impugnación con respecto a la proyectada Central Nuclear de Deba y elabora un in- forme científico sobre las repercusiones ecológicas que las centrales nucleares podían acarrear.
    [Show full text]
  • Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve Moth Survey 2009
    Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve Moth Survey 2009 Fauna Conservation Department Kadoorie Farm & Botanic Garden 29 June 2010 Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden Publication Series: No 6 Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve moth survey 2009 Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve Moth Survey 2009 Executive Summary The objective of this survey was to generate a moth species list for the Butterfly Reserve and Site of Special Scientific Interest [SSSI] at Fung Yuen, Tai Po, Hong Kong. The survey came about following a request from Tai Po Environmental Association. Recording, using ultraviolet light sources and live traps in four sub-sites, took place on the evenings of 24 April and 16 October 2009. In total, 825 moths representing 352 species were recorded. Of the species recorded, 3 meet IUCN Red List criteria for threatened species in one of the three main categories “Critically Endangered” (one species), “Endangered” (one species) and “Vulnerable” (one species” and a further 13 species meet “Near Threatened” criteria. Twelve of the species recorded are currently only known from Hong Kong, all are within one of the four IUCN threatened or near threatened categories listed. Seven species are recorded from Hong Kong for the first time. The moth assemblages recorded are typical of human disturbed forest, feng shui woods and orchards, with a relatively low Geometridae component, and includes a small number of species normally associated with agriculture and open habitats that were found in the SSSI site. Comparisons showed that each sub-site had a substantially different assemblage of species, thus the site as a whole should retain the mosaic of micro-habitats in order to maintain the high moth species richness observed.
    [Show full text]
  • SYSTEMATICS of the MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of T
    SYSTEMATICS OF THE MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Sibyl Rae Bucheli, M.S. ***** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr. John W. Wenzel, Advisor Dr. Daniel Herms Dr. Hans Klompen _________________________________ Dr. Steven C. Passoa Advisor Graduate Program in Entomology ABSTRACT The phylogenetics, systematics, taxonomy, and biology of Gelechioidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera) are investigated. This superfamily is probably the second largest in all of Lepidoptera, and it remains one of the least well known. Taxonomy of Gelechioidea has been unstable historically, and definitions vary at the family and subfamily levels. In Chapters Two and Three, I review the taxonomy of Gelechioidea and characters that have been important, with attention to what characters or terms were used by different authors. I revise the coding of characters that are already in the literature, and provide new data as well. Chapter Four provides the first phylogenetic analysis of Gelechioidea to include molecular data. I combine novel DNA sequence data from Cytochrome oxidase I and II with morphological matrices for exemplar species. The results challenge current concepts of Gelechioidea, suggesting that traditional morphological characters that have united taxa may not be homologous structures and are in need of further investigation. Resolution of this problem will require more detailed analysis and more thorough characterization of certain lineages. To begin this task, I conduct in Chapter Five an in- depth study of morphological evolution, host-plant selection, and geographical distribution of a medium-sized genus Depressaria Haworth (Depressariinae), larvae of ii which generally feed on plants in the families Asteraceae and Apiaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Any Reader Who Knew the British Butterflies in The
    VOLUME 50, NUMBER 2 ]53 Any reade r who knew the British butterflies in the 1950s and before will have memories of rich localities, of pastures, woods and downland from which once common species have long vanished, even if the land seems superficially to have survved. This book misses no opportunity for optimism, however: a few expanding ranges, of the Essex Skipper (Thymelicl1s lineola), the Speckled Wood (Pararge aegeria), and perhaps the White Admiral (Ladoga camilla), are recorded, together with current conservation efforts to keep now highly restricted and threatened species on the British l.'st. To read this book in conjunction with South or Frohawk reveals the general and rapid decline of a fauna, for long relatively stable, for which the blame lies almost entirely with habitat change and degradation, in their richly varied aspects. The illustrations, by Richard Lewington, have neve r, ill my vi.cw, been surpassed. Each butterfly is shown by an upperside (of both sexes where appreciably dimorphic) in "set" position, and by an underside in "perching" pose. British lepidopterists have for long paid much attention to aberrations, and many very remarkable examples of these variants are shown. Other figures, illustrating the butterflies at rest or nectaring are particularly striking through Lewington's use of black and white pencil for the plart or other perching site, against which the beauty of the painted butterflies is seen to best advantage. The effect achieved, for example, by a mating pair of Black Hairstreaks (Strymonidia pruni) on a penciled blackthorn twig, of a male Purple Hairstreak (Ql1ercl1sia quercus) basking on a an oak twig, or the once widespread but now endange red High Brown Fritillary (Argyrmis adippe) perching on a bramble, selected for the title page, is brilliant.
    [Show full text]
  • Bionomics of Bagworms (Lepidoptera: Psychidae)
    ANRV363-EN54-11 ARI 27 August 2008 20:44 V I E E W R S I E N C N A D V A Bionomics of Bagworms ∗ (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) Marc Rhainds,1 Donald R. Davis,2 and Peter W. Price3 1Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 47901; email: [email protected] 2Department of Entomology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C., 20013-7012; email: [email protected] 3Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, 86011-5640; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2009. 54:209–26 Key Words The Annual Review of Entomology is online at bottom-up effects, flightlessness, mating failure, parthenogeny, ento.annualreviews.org phylogenetic constraint hypothesis, protogyny This article’s doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.54.110807.090448 Abstract Copyright c 2009 by Annual Reviews. The bagworm family (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) includes approximately All rights reserved 1000 species, all of which complete larval development within a self- 0066-4170/09/0107-0209$20.00 enclosing bag. The family is remarkable in that female aptery occurs in ∗The U.S. Government has the right to retain a over half of the known species and within 9 of the 10 currently recog- nonexclusive, royalty-free license in and to any nized subfamilies. In the more derived subfamilies, several life-history copyright covering this paper. traits are associated with eruptive population dynamics, e.g., neoteny of females, high fecundity, dispersal on silken threads, and high level of polyphagy. Other salient features shared by many species include a short embryonic period, developmental synchrony, sexual segrega- tion of pupation sites, short longevity of adults, male-biased sex ratio, sexual dimorphism, protogyny, parthenogenesis, and oviposition in the pupal case.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment File.Pdf
    Proc. Proc. Ar thropod. Embryo l. Soc. Jpn. 41 ， 1-9 (2006) l (jJ (jJ 2006 Ar thropodan Embryological Society of Japan ISSN ISSN 1341-1527 [REVIEW] Character Phylogeny in Lepidopteran Embryogenesis: It s Revaluation and Issues to Be Resolved * Yukimasa KOBAYASHI Departme 四t 01 Biological Science ， Graduate School 01 Sciences and Engineerin g， Tokyo Metropolitan University ， Minami-ohsawa Minami-ohsawa 1-1 ，Hachioji ， Tokyo 192-039 7， J4 μn E-mail: E-mail: [email protected] 1. 1. Introduction The order Lepidoptera is the insect group whose embryogenesis has been well investigated. Until about 30 years ago ，however ， the materials had concentrated on the highest group of this order ， or the former suborder Ditrysia ， and nothing nothing had been known of the embryogenesis of primitive ，non-ditrysian Lepidoptera. In several ditrysian species ， for example ， Orgyia antiqua ， Chilo suppressalis ，Pieris rapae ， and Epiphyas pωtvittana ，it had been known that their embryonic embryonic membranes (serosa and amnion) are formed independentl y， not by the fusion of amnioserosal folds to be described described later ，and their germ bands or embryos grow in the submerged condition under the yolk until just before hatching hatching irrespective of the shape and size of eggs (Christensen ， 1943; Okada ， 1960; Tanaka ， 1968; Anderson and Wood ，1968). Since such developmental processes are not common to other insects ，it had been speculated that these processes processes are characteristic not only of the Ditrysia but also of the whole Lepidoptera until the time when Ando and Tanaka Tanaka (1976 ， 1980) found out a di 妊erent mode of ea r1 y embryogen 巴sis in the hepialid moths ，Endoclita ， belonging to the the non-ditrysian Lepidoptera.
    [Show full text]
  • Y Epinotia Subocellana (Donovan, [1806]), Dos Nueva Sespecies Para La Península Ibérica (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) SHILAP Revista De Lepidopterología, Vol
    SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología ISSN: 0300-5267 [email protected] Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología España Ylla, J.; Groenen, F.; Maciá, R. Gravitarmata margarotana (Heinemann, 1863) y Epinotia subocellana (Donovan, [1806]), dos nueva sespecies para la Península Ibérica (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología, vol. 35, núm. 138, junio, 2007, pp. 261-264 Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología Madrid, España Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45513810 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto 261-264 Gravitarmata margarota 23/6/07 18:13 Página 261 SHILAP Revta. lepid., 35 (138), 2007: 261-264 SRLPEF ISSN:0300-5267 Gravitarmata margarotana (Heinemann, 1863) y Epinotia subocellana (Donovan, [1806]), dos nuevas especies para la Península Ibérica (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) J. Ylla, F. Groenen & R Macià Resumen Los autores citan a los tortrícidos Gravitarmata margarotana (Heinemann, 1863) y Epinotia subocellana (Do- novan, [1806]) por primera vez para la Península Ibérica. PALABRAS CLAVE: Lepidoptera, Tortricidae, Gravitarmata margarotana, Epinotia subocellana, nuevas citas, Pe- nínsula Ibérica. Gravitarmata margarotana (Heinemann, 1863) and Epinotia subocellana (Donovan, [1806]), two new species for the Iberian Peninsula. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Abstract The tortricids moths Gravitarmata margarotana (Heinemann, 1863), and Epinotia subocellana (Donovan, [1806]), are reported for the first time from the Iberian Peninsula. KEY WORDS: Lepidoptera, Tortricidae, Gravitarmata margarotana, Epinotia subocellana, new records, Iberian Peninsula. Introducción En el año 2005, el segundo de los autores fue requerido para examinar una caja que contenía va- rios ejemplares de tortrícidos procedentes de España.
    [Show full text]
  • British Lepidoptera (/)
    British Lepidoptera (/) Home (/) Anatomy (/anatomy.html) FAMILIES 1 (/families-1.html) GELECHIOIDEA (/gelechioidea.html) FAMILIES 3 (/families-3.html) FAMILIES 4 (/families-4.html) NOCTUOIDEA (/noctuoidea.html) BLOG (/blog.html) Glossary (/glossary.html) Family: SPHINGIDAE (3SF 13G 18S) Suborder:Glossata Infraorder:Heteroneura Superfamily:Bombycoidea Refs: Waring & Townsend, Wikipedia, MBGBI9 Proboscis short to very long, unscaled. Antenna ~ 1/2 length of forewing; fasciculate or pectinate in male, simple in female; apex pointed. Labial palps long, 3-segmented. Eye large. Ocelli absent. Forewing long, slender. Hindwing ±triangular. Frenulum and retinaculum usually present but may be reduced. Tegulae large, prominent. Leg spurs variable but always present on midtibia. 1st tarsal segment of mid and hindleg about as long as tibia. Subfamily: Smerinthinae (3G 3S) Tribe: Smerinthini Probably characterised by a short proboscis and reduced or absent frenulum Mimas Smerinthus Laothoe 001 Mimas tiliae (Lime Hawkmoth) 002 Smerinthus ocellata (Eyed Hawkmoth) 003 Laothoe populi (Poplar Hawkmoth) (/002- (/001-mimas-tiliae-lime-hawkmoth.html) smerinthus-ocellata-eyed-hawkmoth.html) (/003-laothoe-populi-poplar-hawkmoth.html) Subfamily: Sphinginae (3G 4S) Rest with wings in tectiform position Tribe: Acherontiini Agrius Acherontia 004 Agrius convolvuli 005 Acherontia atropos (Convolvulus Hawkmoth) (Death's-head Hawkmoth) (/005- (/004-agrius-convolvuli-convolvulus- hawkmoth.html) acherontia-atropos-deaths-head-hawkmoth.html) Tribe: Sphingini Sphinx (2S)
    [Show full text]
  • Descripción De Nuevas Especies Animales De La Península Ibérica E Islas Baleares (1978-1994): Tendencias Taxonómicas Y Listado Sistemático
    Graellsia, 53: 111-175 (1997) DESCRIPCIÓN DE NUEVAS ESPECIES ANIMALES DE LA PENÍNSULA IBÉRICA E ISLAS BALEARES (1978-1994): TENDENCIAS TAXONÓMICAS Y LISTADO SISTEMÁTICO M. Esteban (*) y B. Sanchiz (*) RESUMEN Durante el periodo 1978-1994 se han descrito cerca de 2.000 especies animales nue- vas para la ciencia en territorio ibérico-balear. Se presenta como apéndice un listado completo de las especies (1978-1993), ordenadas taxonómicamente, así como de sus referencias bibliográficas. Como tendencias generales en este proceso de inventario de la biodiversidad se aprecia un incremento moderado y sostenido en el número de taxones descritos, junto a una cada vez mayor contribución de los autores españoles. Es cada vez mayor el número de especies publicadas en revistas que aparecen en el Science Citation Index, así como el uso del idioma inglés. La mayoría de los phyla, clases u órdenes mues- tran gran variación en la cantidad de especies descritas cada año, dado el pequeño núme- ro absoluto de publicaciones. Los insectos son claramente el colectivo más estudiado, pero se aprecia una disminución en su importancia relativa, asociada al incremento de estudios en grupos poco conocidos como los nematodos. Palabras clave: Biodiversidad; Taxonomía; Península Ibérica; España; Portugal; Baleares. ABSTRACT Description of new animal species from the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands (1978-1994): Taxonomic trends and systematic list During the period 1978-1994 about 2.000 new animal species have been described in the Iberian Peninsula and the Balearic Islands. A complete list of these new species for 1978-1993, taxonomically arranged, and their bibliographic references is given in an appendix.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Evolution of Lepidoptera
    EN62CH15-Mitter ARI 5 November 2016 12:1 I Review in Advance first posted online V E W E on November 16, 2016. (Changes may R S still occur before final publication online and in print.) I E N C N A D V A Phylogeny and Evolution of Lepidoptera Charles Mitter,1,∗ Donald R. Davis,2 and Michael P. Cummings3 1Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742; email: [email protected] 2Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560 3Laboratory of Molecular Evolution, Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742 Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2017. 62:265–83 Keywords Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2017.62. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org The Annual Review of Entomology is online at Hexapoda, insect, systematics, classification, butterfly, moth, molecular ento.annualreviews.org systematics This article’s doi: Access provided by University of Maryland - College Park on 11/20/16. For personal use only. 10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-035125 Abstract Copyright c 2017 by Annual Reviews. Until recently, deep-level phylogeny in Lepidoptera, the largest single ra- All rights reserved diation of plant-feeding insects, was very poorly understood. Over the past ∗ Corresponding author two decades, building on a preceding era of morphological cladistic stud- ies, molecular data have yielded robust initial estimates of relationships both within and among the ∼43 superfamilies, with unsolved problems now yield- ing to much larger data sets from high-throughput sequencing. Here we summarize progress on lepidopteran phylogeny since 1975, emphasizing the superfamily level, and discuss some resulting advances in our understanding of lepidopteran evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Revista Mundo Artrópodo, Y Están Amparados Por La Normativa Reguladora De La Propiedad Intelectual E Industrial, Quedando Por Tanto Prohibida Su Atentamente
    FOTO DE PORTADA: Pedro Pulido Índice número 4 Pág. 5. Noticias Pág. 7. Introducción al conocimiento de los Quilópodos Pág. 1 9. Argiopes y el arte de sus decoraciones Pág. 25. Historias de Carabus Pág. 35. Aracnofobia. Terror en las sombras Pág. 40. Conversando con Carlos Gómez de Aizpúrua Pág. 49. Insectos acuáticos y contaminación Pág. 56. Normativa y permisos para el estudio de especies silvestres en el medio natural español Pág. 60. Artrópodos en la historia: el mito griego de Aracné Pág. 66. Cabinet de curiosites Pág. 75. Galería del lector Pág. 78. La biblioteca del entomólogo FOTO: Pablo J. Martín 2 FOTO: Blas Ramos EDITORIAL Revista nº 4, julio de 201 8 Hay pocas cosas que a un estudiante satisfagan más que el final de curso. No solamente por dejar atrás nervios, largas sesiones de estudio y exámenes, sino también por las nuevas posibilidades que el tiempo libre nos va a brindar, y que nos va a permitir dedicar más tiempo a nuestras aficiones. Cuando te incorporas al mercado laboral, añoras ese fin de ciclo que cada año tenía lugar al acabar el curso, aunque después, o al menos así me ocurre a mi, lo disfrutamos de nuevo a través de nuestros hijos, viendo como esa felicidad y esas ganas de afrontar el verano les embriaga y nos contagia a todos. Pues es precisamente con ese final de curso, y con esas ganas de aprovechar el verano y de dar rienda suelta a toda esa afición que por los bichos llevamos dentro, que os presentamos este cuarto número de la revista.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]